Why venting doesn’t help you deal with anger | Jennifer Parlamis

Summary

Podcast Summary: TED Talks Daily

Episode: Why venting doesn’t help you deal with anger | Jennifer Parlamis
Date: August 16, 2025
Speaker: Jennifer Parlamis (Social & Organizational Psychology Expert)
Host: Elise Hu

---

Overview of the Episode

In this insightful TED Talk, Jennifer Parlamis challenges the popular belief that venting helps alleviate anger, explaining through personal stories and research why venting often backfires. She delves into the science of anger—how we construct it, why venting tends to reinforce rather than release it, and practical strategies to regulate anger healthily. The talk is personal, relatable, and grounded in psychological research, ending with actionable advice for listeners.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. Personal Story: Where Anger Begins

• Parlamis opens with a relatable story: She used to get frustrated with her husband for pushing their daughter’s stroller in a “too cool, one-handed way,” causing her to make all sorts of negative assumptions about his motives ([02:56]).
• She realizes her anger grows as she imagines possible internal causes ("he doesn’t care about safety," "he thinks only women should push strollers"), and vents her feelings to friends and family.
• A turning point comes when she sees her own father pushing the stroller the same way, and learns he does this to avoid hurting his shins—a purely practical reason ([04:44]).

Quote:
"I was learning all about this cognitive bias, but I made the fundamental attribution error." – Jennifer Parlamis ([05:27])

2. The Myth of Venting and Its Origins

• Venting is widely believed to be helpful as a form of “catharsis,” a concept popularized by Freud’s hydraulic model (anger as steam that must be vented lest it explode) ([09:00]).
• Research overwhelmingly shows venting doesn’t reduce anger; it often worsens it.
• Anger is constructed through the attributions we make—when we interpret others’ actions as intentional or malicious, our anger increases ([06:25]).

Quote:
"Anger and attributions have this recursive process... the more I hold someone responsible for some action, the angrier I am, and the angrier I get, the more I hold that person responsible." – Jennifer Parlamis ([07:40])

3. Research: Why Doesn't Venting Work? Why Do We Keep Doing It?

• Parlamis’ research investigates two questions:
  1. Why doesn’t venting work?
  2. Why do we keep doing it anyway?
• Study findings:
  • Venting to a third party (e.g., friend) leads people to reinforce internal attributions about the offender, thereby escalating their anger ([10:34]).
  • Venting to the offender results in fewer internal attributions and participants report less anger.
  • Key insight: Venting is not about changing perspectives; it usually reinforces angry interpretations ([11:12]).

Quote:
"...when people vented to a friend, to a third party, they vented with more internal controllable attributions... When they vented to the offender, interestingly, they used fewer internal controllable attributions and they actually felt less angry." – Jennifer Parlamis ([11:13])

4. The Social Function of Venting

• Despite not reducing anger, venting persists because it serves a social function: it makes us feel heard, supported, and less alone, improving our overall emotional tone ([13:44]).
• The “feel better” effect isn’t about anger reduction, but about social connection.

5. Physiological Arousal vs. Anger Reduction

• Activities like running, yelling, or “venting into a pillow” feel cathartic but do not reduce anger physiologically ([14:53]).
• A meta-analysis of 40 years of research confirms: physiologically arousing activities do not decrease anger; what works are activities that lower arousal—such as meditation, deep breathing, or yoga ([15:28]).

Quote:
"Physiologically arousing activities do not decrease anger. Verbal venting, being one of those physiologically arousing activities... What does reduce anger... is actually activities that reduce your physiological arousal." – Jennifer Parlamis ([15:36])

6. Constructive Approaches to Anger

• Anger is not inherently negative; it can motivate necessary change, e.g., leaving toxic relationships or fighting injustice ([16:01]).
• The key is regulation: Use anger to drive meaningful action, not to damage relationships.

Parlamis’ Four Strategies for Regulating Anger:

1. Engage in Low-Arousal Activities (e.g., meditation, yoga, deep breathing)
2. Check Your Attributions: Monitor and question interpretations—consider possible external causes ([16:42]).
3. Gather New Information: Ask, “What don’t I know here?”
4. Be Deliberate About Your Actions: Act consciously, not reactively.

Quote:
"Freud talked about venting the steam. It’s not about that. It’s what’s going through the pipe. Think about those attributions you’re making." – Jennifer Parlamis ([16:45])

7. Personal Closure and Final Thought

• Parlamis follows up with how her own family has evolved: her husband now practices yoga for genuine reasons, reminding her not to jump to negative conclusions ([17:20]).
• Final advice: “If you feel yourself, that little spark of anger, don’t vent. Check those attributions and do a little yoga.” ([17:50])

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• On the self-reinforcing cycle of anger:
  "Anger and attributions have this recursive process... the more I hold someone responsible for some action, the angrier I am, and the angrier I get, the more I hold that person responsible." ([07:40])
• On the limitations of venting:
  "We realized, we concluded the answer to why verbal venting doesn’t work is because you’re not changing those attributes, you’re just rehearsing those attributions that led to your anger in the first place." ([11:20])
• On what actually works:
  "What does reduce anger across these 40 years of studies is actually activities that reduce your physiological arousal. Things like meditation, deep breathing, yoga." ([15:40])
• On building bridges:
  "When I vented about my husband with the weird stroller pushing that he did, I wasn’t building a bridge between us. I was actually making more distance between us. But what does and could build bridges are things that come out of this research..." ([16:23])

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• [02:56] – Parlamis’ personal stroller story: How anger and attributions build
• [05:27] – Discovery of the attribution error
• [09:00] – The "hydraulic model" of anger (Freud) explained and debunked
• [10:34] – Study findings: Venting to friends vs. offenders
• [11:13] – Why venting to friends often makes you angrier
• [13:44] – The social/relational benefit of venting
• [14:53] – Why running/workouts/yelling aren’t effective for anger reduction
• [15:28] – Meta-analysis: What actually decreases anger?
• [16:42] – Parlamis’ four strategies for regulating anger
• [17:20] – Updated family story: The positive evolution of husband and daughter

---

Conclusion

This episode offers an accessible, research-backed look at why venting doesn’t work to resolve anger, what actually escalates our feelings, and how to turn anger into a force for connection and productive action. Parlamis’ advice: next time you feel heated, pause to check your assumptions and try some yoga instead of venting.

Transcript

[Jennifer Parlamus]

Ready to order? Yes.

[Elise Hu]

We're earning unlimited 3% cash back on dining and entertainment with a Capital One Saver card. So let's just get one of everything.

[Jennifer Parlamus]

Everything.

[Capital One Saver Card Announcer]

Fire everything. The Capital One Saver card is at table 27 and they're earning unlimited 3% cash back.

[Jennifer Parlamus]

Yes, Chef. This is so nice.

[Capital One Saver Card Announcer]

Had a feeling you'd want 3% cash back on dessert.

[Elise Hu]

Ooh, tiramisu.

[Capital One Saver Card Announcer]

Earn unlimited 3% cash back on dining and entertainment with the Capital One Saver Card. Capital One what's in your wallet?

[Jennifer Parlamus]

Terms apply. See capitalone.com for details.

[Land Rover Defender 110 Announcer]

Meet the Defender 110 a vehicle built for the modern explorer. With on road presence and off road prowess, it's naturally capable and expedition ready. A raised hood, sculpted grille and durable exterior make it look tough because it is inside. 5. Seat comfort comes standard with an option for 7. Navigate any terrain confidently with 3D surround cameras and the intuitive Pivi Pro infotainment system. There's a Defender for every journey 90, 110 or 160 30, which boasts room for up to 8. Design your Defender 110@Land RoverUSA.com that's Land RoverUSA.com.

[Elise Hu]

This episode of TED Talks Daily is brought to you by upwork. Scaling a business means solving for today and preparing for what's next. And to do that well, you need the right talent at the right moment. That's where upwork comes in. Whether you're looking for support in design, development, marketing or AI, upwork connects you with highly skilled freelancers who are ready to hit the ground running. For over 20 years, Upwork has been creating a better way to work, helping companies of all sizes tap into a global marketplace of trusted experts. You can post a job for free, browse profiles, even get help crafting your job post or book a consultation. From start to finish, upwork makes hiring more flexible, more affordable, and more efficient. So if you need an extra pair of hands or 10, visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That's Upwork.com to post your job for free and connect with top talent ready to help your business grow up. W o r k.com upwork.com you're listening to Ted Talks Daily where we bring you new ideas to spark your curiosity every day. I'm your host, Elise Hu. Venting we all do it. Something frustrates us and we vent to a partner or a friend, hoping it'll make us feel better. But does it actually work? In this talk, social and organizational psychology expert Jennifer Parlamus Unpacks the science of anger and the myths behind venting and reveals why it actually can reinforce anger rather than alleviate it. She shares what you might want to consider doing instead.

[Jennifer Parlamus]

So I'd like to begin with a story. When my daughter was a baby, we lived in New York City. And I was there studying to get a PhD in social and organizational psychology. And I was researching conflict resolution and negotiation. And like most New Yorkers, we would walk everywhere and I would push her in a stroller with two hands, like a responsible parent, all over the city. But I noticed that my husband, he pushed the stroller quite differently, with one hand kind of off to the side and kind of looking a little bit too cool, like he had better places to be. And this really bothered me. I started to get angry and I started to make all these causal attributions, what psychologists call these explanations for his behavior. One I thought maybe, oh, he's a hotshot Wall street lawyer now. He thinks he's too good to push a stroller. Or I thought maybe, maybe he thinks women are the only ones who should push strollers. Or maybe he didn't care about safety and that was why he was doing it that way. So as I was thinking about all these explanations for his behavior, I started to get angry and that anger started to build up. And I vented. I expressed my anger forcefully to anybody who would listen. Called my friends, called my sister. But that venting didn't help release my anger. I actually felt even angrier. Until one day I saw my dad pushing the stroller the exact same way he came into the city and he was taking my daughter to the park, and he's walking like that. And I know my dad doesn't care about looking cool. Sorry, dad. And I said, I know I must be missing something here. What don't I know about the situation? So I asked him a simple question. I said, dad, why are you pushing the stroller like this? And he said, oh, well, because when I use two hands, my stride is too long and I kick the bottom of the stroller and it hurts. It actually cuts into my shins. He's like, so I much prefer it, but that's why I do it. And so what I realized at the time, I was learning all about this cognitive bias, but I made the fundamental attribution error. This is when you over attribute the causes for someone's behavior to something internal to them, something internal and controllable, rather than to some external cause. So you under emphasize the external or situational causes that might be really the explanations for someone's behavior. So at that moment I started to get really curious about venting because I thought that was helping me in some way. But so as a researcher and getting my PhD, I started to look into venting a little bit more. And I found out that actually, actually venting doesn't release anger. And many years of research showed that. And I thought, well, this is really important because we have anger all around us all the time. If you think about road rage or trolls on the Internet, or divisive politics or wars, anger is everywhere. And maybe we're not really knowing how we should manage that. So my research early in my career asked some really critical questions. I thought one is if venting doesn't work, why not? And if venting doesn't work, why do we keep doing it? Okay, so hold on to those questions for a minute because I want to back up and talk a little bit about anger first. So cognitive appraisal theorists talk about anger as not something that happens to us, but rather something that we construct in our brain when we assign explanations to some event. So when I was pushing the stroller and I saw my husband pushing it in this kind of odd way, I started to build these explanations, as I said, these internal controllable causes for his behavior. And those causal attributions led to my anger. Okay? And they also say that anger and attributions have this recursive process. It's a self reinforcing process where the more I hold someone responsible for some action, the angrier I am and the angrier I get, the more I hold that person responsible. So it becomes self reinforcing cycle. Now there's something else that happens with anger too. Anger has action tendencies. So it pushes us to act, to do something. It readies us for some action. And that's important because what I did was I vented as the action I took my anger and I vented, but it didn't decrease my anger. So let me make this a little bit more personal for just a moment. And I want you to think about your own experience with anger. If you can take a moment right now and recall a time where you felt angry at someone, it could be maybe someone at work, maybe in traffic, maybe politics. Think about what you're angry about. And now think about those causal attributions, those explanations that you have for why this is happening. Why did this anger provoking event occur? So just take one pause and think about that. Did you make internal controllable attributions? So maybe you Got cut off in traffic. Did you say, oh, that person's so inconsiderate, Something about them that they had control over? Or maybe someone did something else and you said, oh, they're so selfish? Or if you're thinking about maybe some particular politicians, oh, they're such a narcissist, or they're incompetent. Maybe you thought that maybe, however, you made some external attributions. So maybe you said something like, well, they were late because of the snowstorm, something that they're not in control over, or they had a family emergency. If you make external attributions, you tend not to get angry or less so you may actually feel some empathy or sadness. And if you blame yourself for a negative behavior or a negative event, you might feel shame. So every attribution kind of relates to particular emotions. Now, how many of you, after this event, this anger that I asked you just to recall a moment ago, how many of you actually vented? Maybe show of hands, some of you? Yeah, okay. So some people vent as a way to deal with their anger, like I did. You would be in very good company, because Freud, Sigmund Freud, advocated venting as a way to manage your anger. He actually talked about something called the hydraulic model. So the hydraulic model, he compared anger inside an individual to steam inside a hot pipe. And if you didn't vent the steam from the pipe, the pipe would explode. And similarly, he said, if people don't somehow release their anger through venting verbally, they would then act out. They would become aggressive. So this metaphor, it was very compelling. It stuck. People believed in it and they kept doing it. However, as I said just a little moment ago, most of the research on venting shows that it doesn't work. So let's get to my research and those two questions that I said at the beginning. One, if venting doesn't work, why not? And if venting doesn't work, why do we keep doing it? So my first research with my co authors, we looked at venting verbally, which means expressing your anger forcefully to someone else. And we looked at the different targets. So we looked at either a friend, a third party, somebody who's not involved in the conflict, or the offender, the offender, the person involved in whatever conflict or anger provoking incident. We asked participants to recall. We also had a control group where they just recalled the anger they didn't actually vent. And we wanted to see what happened and to see kind of the process. That first question, why isn't the venting working? And we found that when people vented to a friend, to a third party, they vented with more internal controllable attributions. And those internal controllable attributions led to that anger. And that's that self reinforcing cycle that I just talked about a moment ago. When they vented to the offender, interestingly, they used fewer internal controllable attributions and they actually felt less angry. So we realized, we concluded the answer to why verbal venting doesn't work is because you're not changing those attributes, you're just rehearsing those attributions that led to your anger in the first place. Okay, so answer to question one. But that didn't answer question two, which is why do we keep doing it if it's not releasing our anger? So what we did next was venting doesn't happen in a vacuum, right? There's usually somebody responding to us. So we said, let's look at responses now. And we asked the third party, that friend, to give some responses to the person venting. They either reinforced the interpretation, so those explanations with internal controllable attributions, they would say something like, yeah, you're right to be angry, they are really selfish. That would be reinforcing. Or we ask them to reinterpret. Well, have you thought about some other possible causes for this? Maybe something external. In both cases, the anger didn't change. They remained angry no matter what the response was. However, we did measure a separate emotion, something that looked at overall well being. We called it emotional tone. And we found that emotional tone did change significantly after getting a response from the other party. And this is what we thought. And we concluded that this is why people keep venting. It's because venting is not just and emotional process. Venting is also a social and relational process. So we felt better, we felt heard, we felt less alone. So we vented. Okay, and so that's the answer to the second question, why do we keep doing it? Because we might not be impacting our anger, but we are feeling better overall. That's not the whole story. One more thing. So when I asked you before, some people raised their hand about venting. Maybe some people do other things when they get angry. Maybe you go for a really long run. Some people said yes. Yeah, sometimes you go to the gym, maybe work out, maybe you scream into a pillow. Well, bad news, that doesn't help either. So research by researchers at Ohio State University did a very recent 2024 meta analysis where they looked at 40 years of venting research and they found that physiologically arousing activities do not decrease anger. Verbal venting, being one of those physiologically arousing activities. It raises your heart rate, it raises your blood pressure. That does not reduce anger. What does reduce anger across these 40 years of studies they found is actually activities that reduce your physiological arousal. Things like meditation, deep breathing, yoga. So what I'm saying here is really, I want to say one thing really important. Anger isn't bad. Anger is actually a motivator to do something right. It has that action tendency. And anger can get you out of a bad relationship. It can motivate you to leave a job when you have a toxic boss. It can allow you to stand up when you think that there's an injustice. It can have you fight for rights. So anger is a really useful emotion. However, we have to know how to regulate it. Otherwise we won't be using it, it will be using us. So we have to think about better ways to regulate our anger. Venting isn't doing it. Okay, so this TED conference today is about building bridges. And when I vented about my husband with the weird stroller pushing that he did, I wasn't building a bridge between us. I was actually making more distance between us. But what does and could build bridges are things that come out of this research that I've talked about today. Here are four things you can do if you're looking to regulate your anger and then use it to direct it in the appropriate ways. Engage in low arousal activities. Check those causal attributions. Right. So Freud talked about venting the steam. It's not about that. It's what's going through the pipe. Think about those attributions you're making. Be more conscious of that. Remember, you might want to gather some new information. What don't you know? Ask yourself that question. And then also be very deliberate about your actions. Consider what actions you're going to take. As I said, anger can be a useful emotion. You just want to be in charge of the actions you take. And finally, to wrap up, you might be wondering what my husband's up to these days. Well, he's no longer a Wall street lawyer and he actually is taking up yoga. And he does it usually right before dinner when the dishes need to be put on the table. And maybe you might want to unload the dishwasher. And if I didn't know my research, I might say he's being really selfish. He's trying to get out of responsibilities. And I might vent. I might call my sister and vent. About it, but I don't. What I do instead is I ask, what don't I know? I do a little more digging. And you know my daughter who was in the stroller so many years ago? Well, she lives in London now. She's a huge fan of yoga and he's practicing a lot because she's invited him to a yoga retreat so that they can do together when they see each other next month. So if you feel yourself, that little spark of anger, don't vent. Check those attributions and do a little yoga. Thank you.

[Elise Hu]

That was Jennifer Parlamus at TEDx GVA Grad in Geneva, Switzerland in 2025. If you're curious about TED's curation, find out [e-mail] curationguidelines and that's it for today's show. TED Talks Daily is part of the TED Audio Collective. This episode was produced and edited by our team, Martha Estefanos, Oliver Friedman, Brian Greene, Lucy Little, Alejandra Salazar and Tonsika Sarmarnivon. It was mixed by Christopher Faizy Bogan. Additional support from Emma Tobner and Daniela Ballarezzo. I'm Elise Hu. I'll be back tomorrow with a fresh idea for your feed. Thanks for listening.

[Fin AI Customer Service Announcer]

AI is transforming customer service. It's real and it works. And with fin, we've built the number one AI agent for customer service. We're seeing lots of cases where it's solving up to 90% of real queries for real businesses. This includes the real world complex stuff like issuing a refund or canceling an order. And we also see it when FIN goes up against competitors. It's top of all the performance benchmarks, top of the G2 leaderboard, and if you're not happy, we'll refund you up to a million dollars, which I think says it all. Check it out for yourself at fin.

[Capital One Bank Guy]

AI banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One bank guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too. Aw, really? Thanks. Capital One Bank Guy what's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capitalone.com Bank Capital One NA Member FDIC A real lemonade Pet Insurance Review by Madison H. You know, I thought.

[Madison H.]

It was a little ridiculous to get pet insurance, but I really didn't want to not take my little kitten to the vet because of money. In the last eight months, I've taken him in six times because of ear infections and saved literally hundreds of dollars. He may even need to get surgery, and I couldn't consider it without Lemonade's help. I recommend Lemonade to all my friends constantly, and now I'm recommending it to you.

[Jennifer Parlamus]

Check it out at lemonade. Com.

[Elise Hu]

Peter.