Podcast
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Hosted by Real Story Media · EN
🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
438episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
What Does The Developmental Profile Behind D4VD Tell Us About The Celeste Rivas Hernandez Case?
2d ago00:42:21Tap to summarizePsychotherapist Shavaun Scott, with more than thirty years of forensic mental health experience, provides a developmental analysis of David Anthony Burke's trajectory from a restrictive Houston household to a globally touring recording artist signed to Darkroom and Interscope Records — and the systemic failures she identifies at every stage.Burke was homeschooled. His mother served as his teacher and primary social contact. Gospel was reportedly the only music permitted in the home until approximately age thirteen. The transition from a controlled environment to unrestricted digital access occurred without any documented intermediary — no gradual exposure, no external socialization structure, no institutional safeguard. By seventeen, Burke was signed to a major label, touring internationally, and generating significant revenue. The adults in his professional orbit were apparently structured around product management rather than developmental oversight. His mother reportedly managed his business finances.Scott examines the forensic psychology literature on this specific developmental sequence: extended isolation during formative peer-socialization years, abrupt transition to unrestricted access, sudden acquisition of wealth and status without corresponding emotional infrastructure, and the absence of accountability mechanisms within the professional ecosystem. She identifies the specific vulnerabilities this trajectory allegedly creates in a developing adolescent mind and explains why the pattern has been documented in prior forensic case studies.Prosecutors allege Burke is responsible for the death of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez and that the killing was motivated by career protection. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges and maintains his innocence. This analysis does not address the criminal charges directly. It examines the developmental conditions that allegedly preceded the conduct prosecutors describe — and the failures of family, industry, and institutional oversight that Scott argues are identifiable at each stage of the trajectory.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ForensicPsychology #MusicIndustry #Interscope #JusticeForCeleste
Transcribe →Does Richard Allen's Delphi Conviction Survive The Confession And Warrant Challenges?
2d ago00:42:13Tap to summarizeThe appellate challenge to Richard Allen's conviction in the Delphi murders rests on two primary grounds: the reliability of over sixty custodial confessions made during a period of diagnosed psychosis, and the validity of the probable cause affidavit that authorized the search warrant initiating the entire prosecution.On the confession issue, the defense filings document the following timeline. Allen was placed in solitary confinement at Westville Correctional Facility upon his arrest. IDOC policy limited such confinement for inmates with his mental health classification to thirty days. Allen remained in the most restrictive cell for approximately thirteen months. During that period, prison medical staff diagnosed him as gravely disabled and psychotic. He was forcibly administered antipsychotic medications. His weight dropped to approximately 135 pounds. He reportedly confused nightmares with reality and believed he had initiated a global conflict.Prior to solitary, during the arrest interrogation, Allen — after being subjected to what the defense characterizes as over an hour of deceptive interview techniques by Detective Holeman — stated: "I am not going to say something I did not do." The subsequent confessions, numbering over sixty, contained factual errors inconsistent with the known evidence. He confessed to shooting victims who died from blade wounds. He described acts for which no corroborating evidence exists. His initial statement to his wife was qualified: "I think I did it." Dr. Westcott's 127-page forensic evaluation ruled out malingering and attributed the psychosis to the conditions of confinement. The jury heard the confessions but was not presented with the audio of Allen's psychotic episodes or the expert testimony characterizing them as false.The warrant challenge is equally foundational. Detective Liggett's probable cause affidavit allegedly included material misrepresentations of witness testimony. Witness Betsy Blair described Bridge Guy as a young man in his twenties with distinctive brown hair — a description that does not match Allen's appearance at 44 with a crew cut. The defense alleges selective inclusion of corroborating details and omission of contradicting ones. A Franks hearing was denied. Without the warrant, no subsequent evidence in the case exists. An appellate court will determine whether these challenges constitute reversible error.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Delphi #RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #FalseConfessions #SearchWarrant #FranksHearing #SolitaryConfinement #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby
Transcribe →
What Is A Wrench Attack And Could It Explain The Nancy Guthrie Disappearance?
2d ago00:45:22Tap to summarizeIn FBI and digital forensic terminology, a wrench attack is an organized crypto-extortion operation in which networks recruit disposable operatives to physically coerce targets into surrendering cryptocurrency holdings. These operations employ encrypted handler communications, layered payment channels designed to resist tracing, and deliberate separation between the operatives who execute the physical intrusion and the architects who direct it. Cases have been documented across multiple jurisdictions.CertiK, a leading blockchain security firm, included Nancy Guthrie's name on its official 2026 wrench attack case list. The theory gained further attention due to temporal and geographic proximity to a confirmed wrench attack in Scottsdale, Arizona — where two California teenagers, directed by anonymous handlers via Signal, drove 600 miles dressed as FedEx drivers and forced entry into a residence demanding $66 million in cryptocurrency. That incident occurred on January 31st — the same date Nancy Guthrie allegedly vanished from her Tucson-area home approximately ninety minutes to the south.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer evaluates the theory against the publicly available evidence. She identifies elements proponents cite as consistent with the wrench attack model and examines each against the documented operational patterns of confirmed cases.The evidentiary gaps she identifies are specific. No cryptocurrency trail has been publicly established connecting the Guthrie residence to digital asset holdings that would attract this type of operation. The individual captured on doorbell footage appeared to discover the camera in real time — inconsistent with the pre-operation intelligence gathering typical of organized wrench attacks. The equipment visible in the footage does not match standard operative provisioning in documented cases. CertiK's classification may rest substantially on ransom demands that law enforcement has reportedly already dissociated from the underlying criminal act.Coffindaffer also distinguishes the operational characteristics of the Scottsdale incident from what the evidence shows in the Guthrie case. Nancy Guthrie was 84. She remains missing. Her family continues to offer a $1 million reward.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #WrenchAttack #CryptoCrime #CertiK #Scottsdale #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonArizona
Transcribe →
How Did The Kouri Richins Case Go From Stalled To Conviction?
3d ago00:42:48Tap to summarizeThe criminal investigation into Eric Richins' death had effectively stalled by fall 2022. Deputy Jayme Woody acknowledged the investigative lapse under oath at trial. The break came not from law enforcement but from a private investigator retained by the victim's family on a civil matter.Todd Gabler, a 34-year veteran investigator who had worked exclusively for the defense throughout his career, identified the individual prosecutors would later allege sourced the fentanyl, documented her criminal history and drug court failures, and began providing evidentiary material to the Summit County Sheriff's Office that the agency had not independently obtained. Gabler conducted a multi-day search of the Richins residence after law enforcement released the scene, utilizing body cameras to document findings the initial search had not captured. He conducted approximately 50 interviews and tracked multiple vehicles connected to the case.The financial motive presented at trial was comprehensive. Kouri Richins carried approximately $7.5 million in debt. Her forensic accountant characterized the financial situation as an implosion — 236 insufficient-funds transactions, fifteen failed renovation projects, and a residential construction business in freefall. Eric Richins had been consulting divorce attorneys and estate planners, had removed the defendant from his will and life insurance designations, and had established a trust for their three minor children without her knowledge.The defendant's prenuptial agreement created a financial landscape in which the victim's death was the only scenario producing net financial benefit. She secretly purchased $1.9 million in life insurance policies on Eric's life without his knowledge. Trial evidence included communications referencing "the Michael Jackson stuff" directed to her housekeeper and text messages documenting a concurrent relationship with Robert Josh Grossmann. The prosecution presented an alleged escalation pattern — a poisoning attempt in Greece, a fentanyl-laced sandwich on Valentine's Day from which Eric survived by using his son's EpiPen, and a final lethal dose administered in a cocktail approximately two weeks later at five times the fatal threshold. The jury returned guilty verdicts on all counts following deliberations of less than three hours.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #ToddGabler #FentanylPoisoning #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #SummitCounty #InsuranceFraud #JusticeForEric
Transcribe →
How Does The Defense Fight The Anna Kepner Cruise Ship Murder When Identity Isn't The Issue?
3d ago00:37:34Tap to summarizeTimothy Hudson is reportedly captured on surveillance footage as the only individual entering and exiting the stateroom aboard the Carnival Horizon where Anna Kepner's body was found concealed on November 7, 2025. The body was positioned under a bed, wrapped in a blanket, and covered with life preservers. The medical examiner determined the cause of death to be mechanical asphyxiation and ruled it a homicide. A federal grand jury indicted Hudson as an adult on first-degree murder and aggravated harm charges. He has pleaded not guilty. Trial is scheduled for September 8th.With identity effectively established by the surveillance evidence, the defense's viable avenues narrow to charge severity, degree of intent, and mitigating circumstances — including the decisions made by the adults responsible for both the victim and the defendant.The publicly reported pre-incident history is substantial. Anna Kepner's ex-boyfriend reportedly told investigators Hudson attempted to climb on top of her during a FaceTime call. He was allegedly fixated on her and reportedly wanted to pursue a romantic relationship despite their step-sibling status. He allegedly habitually carried a large knife. Anna's aunt has stated publicly that Anna did not want to go on the cruise and was afraid of Hudson. Despite these reported warnings, Anna was placed in a shared stateroom with Hudson with no parental presence.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines the strategic calculus of a defense built around adult failure — the risks of jury backlash against perceived deflection, the tension between mitigation and accountability, and the procedural mechanisms for introducing family culpability into a federal trial.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer addresses the prosecution's "without any warning" characterization in light of the reported behavioral pattern and examines the forensic significance of deliberate concealment paired with a claimed memory loss.Timothy's biological mother and her husband have reportedly indicated they will not attend the trial. His father alleges she chose her marriage over her son. The absence of parental support at a federal murder trial carries evidentiary and psychological weight before a jury.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CarnivalHorizon #FederalTrial #JusticeForAnna
Transcribe →
Does Richard Allen's Conviction Survive The Appellate Challenge On The Search Warrant?
3d ago00:39:12Tap to summarizeThe search warrant that initiated the prosecution of Richard Allen in the Delphi murders rested on a probable cause affidavit authored by Detective Tony Liggett. According to the appellant's brief, that affidavit allegedly contained material misrepresentations of witness testimony and strategic omissions of details that would have undermined the connection between Allen and Bridge Guy.The defense identifies specific alleged discrepancies. Witness Betsy Blair described the man on the bridge as young, in his twenties, with poofy brown hair — a description that does not match Allen, who was 44 with a crew cut. The defense alleges Liggett included Blair's jacket description while omitting her physical description of the person. Blair's sketch of the vehicle at the scene allegedly did not match Allen's Ford Focus — omitted from the affidavit. Sarah Carbaugh reportedly described a tan jacket; the affidavit allegedly characterized it as blue and added "bloody." Blair reportedly told investigators these were two different men. Allen reportedly told investigators he didn't know what he was wearing; the affidavit allegedly stated he admitted to a blue Carhartt jacket and head covering. The defense requested a Franks hearing to challenge the warrant's validity. The trial court denied the motion.The defense's position is that without this warrant, no subsequent evidence exists — no search, no firearm recovery, no bullet comparison, no arrest, no custodial confessions.The appellate filings also present the investigation's treatment of alternate suspects excluded from the jury's consideration. One suspect allegedly created artwork in 2018 depicting the exact positioning of a victim. He admitted to pagan rituals four days post-murder. He possessed a .40 caliber firearm matching the caliber found at the scene. His recorded interview was allegedly erased. The firearm was never collected. His employer's offer of alibi surveillance footage was allegedly declined. An ISP Trooper's request for further investigation was reportedly denied by superiors. Neither this suspect nor his associate has been charged. The appellate court will determine whether these exclusions and omissions constitute reversible error.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#Delphi #RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #SearchWarrant #FranksHearing #DetectiveLiggett #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #AbbyAndLibby #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby
Transcribe →
How Did The Kouri Richins Case Go From Stalled To Conviction?
3d ago00:56:58Tap to summarizeThe criminal investigation into Eric Richins' death had effectively stalled by fall 2022. Deputy Jayme Woody acknowledged the investigative lapse under oath at trial. The break came not from law enforcement but from a private investigator retained by the victim's family on a civil matter.Todd Gabler, a 34-year veteran investigator who had worked exclusively for the defense throughout his career, identified the individual prosecutors would later allege sourced the fentanyl, documented her criminal history and drug court failures, and began providing evidentiary material to the Summit County Sheriff's Office that the agency had not independently obtained. Gabler conducted a multi-day search of the Richins residence after law enforcement released the scene, utilizing body cameras to document findings the initial search had not captured. He conducted approximately 50 interviews and tracked multiple vehicles connected to the case.The financial motive presented at trial was comprehensive. Kouri Richins carried approximately $7.5 million in debt. Her forensic accountant characterized the financial situation as an implosion — 236 insufficient-funds transactions, fifteen failed renovation projects, and a residential construction business in freefall. Eric Richins had been consulting divorce attorneys and estate planners, had removed the defendant from his will and life insurance designations, and had established a trust for their three minor children without her knowledge.The defendant's prenuptial agreement created a financial landscape in which the victim's death was the only scenario producing net financial benefit. She secretly purchased $1.9 million in life insurance policies on Eric's life without his knowledge. Trial evidence included communications referencing "the Michael Jackson stuff" directed to her housekeeper and text messages documenting a concurrent relationship with Robert Josh Grossmann. The prosecution presented an alleged escalation pattern — a poisoning attempt in Greece, a fentanyl-laced sandwich on Valentine's Day from which Eric survived by using his son's EpiPen, and a final lethal dose administered in a cocktail approximately two weeks later at five times the fatal threshold. The jury returned guilty verdicts on all counts following deliberations of less than three hours.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #ToddGabler #FentanylPoisoning #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #SummitCounty #InsuranceFraud #JusticeForEric
Transcribe →
Can A Prosecution Survive The Investigative Failures In The Nancy Guthrie Case?
3d ago00:39:30Tap to summarizeThe Nancy Guthrie investigation has accumulated a documented record of procedural and operational failures that raise a forward-looking legal question: if a suspect is identified and charged, can the prosecution withstand defense challenges rooted in the investigation's own conduct?The crime scene was allegedly released prematurely. A thermal imaging aircraft was reportedly grounded due to a personnel reassignment driven by personal conflict rather than operational judgment. The initial lead sergeant reportedly lacked homicide investigation experience. Experienced investigators had reportedly been sidelined. The sheriff's department declared doorbell camera footage from the night of Nancy's disappearance unrecoverable — the FBI subsequently produced it approximately ten days later. Sheriff Nanos publicly stated Nancy had been abducted, then retracted the characterization the following day.The evidentiary foundation that exists is substantial. Unknown DNA from an unidentified contributor was recovered from inside the residence. The sample has been routed through multiple federal and state laboratories rather than directly to the FBI's Quantico facility — a routing decision retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines for its impact on processing timelines. Forensic genealogy remains a viable secondary pathway if the contributor is not in CODIS.The digital evidence pool is extensive — thousands of hours of surveillance footage from intersection cameras, doorbell systems, and residential security feeds across the Tucson area. Vehicle identification — specifically a white truck and red sedan reported near the property — cellphone tower data, and movement timeline reconstruction represent the parallel investigative track. Coffindaffer assesses the realistic processing timeline for this volume and identifies which evidence pathway is more likely to produce an identification first.She also addresses the inter-agency friction — the FBI Director's public statement that his agency was denied access for four days, the sheriff's contradicting account — and whether the investigative failures documented to date would provide a defense attorney with viable suppression arguments or reasonable-doubt ammunition at trial.Nancy Guthrie was 84 when she allegedly disappeared from her home. Blood, doorbell footage, pacemaker disconnection, and personal belongings left behind. No arrest. No named suspect. The family remains cleared and continues to offer a $1 million reward.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBI #ChrisNanos #DNAEvidence #CODIS #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonArizona
Transcribe →
Can The Nancy Guthrie Investigation Be Taken From The Sheriff Entirely?
4d ago00:32:46Tap to summarizeThe Pima County Sheriff has confirmed he is no longer in direct communication with Nancy Guthrie's family. The FBI has assumed the role of sole point of contact. In a case where an 84-year-old woman has been missing for over three months — allegedly taken against her will from her Tucson-area home — the transfer of family communication away from the lead local agency raises significant procedural and jurisdictional questions.The known evidence is substantial. Blood confirmed as Nancy Guthrie's was found on her porch. Doorbell camera footage captured a masked, armed figure — footage the FBI reportedly recovered from backend data because the family lacked a recording subscription. Her pacemaker disconnected from its monitoring application in the early morning hours. Her phone, wallet, and daily medication were left behind. No arrest has been made. No suspect has been publicly identified.The inter-agency conflict is now public record. The FBI Director stated his agency was denied access to the investigation for four days. The Pima County Sheriff maintains federal agents were present from the outset. The crime scene was allegedly released prematurely. A sergeant reportedly without homicide investigation experience was assigned as lead.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the operational significance of the communication shift — what it reveals about investigative control, trust dynamics between agencies, and the practical implications for case progress. She assesses the sheriff's public claim that the investigation is "getting closer."Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis addresses the family's potential legal remedies. The Guthrie family — cleared by law enforcement and offering a $1 million reward — has been targeted by content creators who allegedly built audiences through fabricated accusations. Media outlets amplified unverified ransom communications that may have compromised the active investigation. Faddis examines potential defamation claims, county liability, and whether Arizona law provides a mechanism to transfer investigative authority away from the sheriff's department. He also addresses what Arizona's victim rights statutes reportedly guarantee families in active investigations.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBI #ChrisNanos #PimaCountySheriff #JenniferCoffindaffer #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonArizona
Transcribe →
How Did A Private Investigator Break The Kouri Richins Case Wide Open?
4d ago00:45:31Tap to summarizeTodd Gabler spent 34 years as a private investigator working exclusively for the defense. He had never taken a prosecution-side case. Eric Richins' family retained him on a civil matter — and the phone records he obtained in the initial weeks altered the trajectory of the entire criminal investigation.The billing records documented sustained contact between Kouri Richins and a housekeeper with an active criminal record who was failing court-ordered drug testing — during the months preceding and following Eric Richins' death. Law enforcement had not yet obtained those records. Gabler identified the pattern, subsequently conducted approximately 50 interviews, tracked multiple vehicles, and assembled evidentiary material that contributed to breaking open a stalled criminal investigation. This marks the first public interview with the investigator who was inside the case prior to any charges being filed.The post-conviction conduct documented in the record raises distinct concerns about ongoing threat. Prior to sentencing, a message attributed to the defendant was included in the prosecution's filing: she stated her intention to "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." She wrote, "They picked the wrong one." She allegedly authored correspondence from jail directing a family member to provide false testimony. She faces accusations of witness intimidation. Her thirteen-year-old son testified to the court that he fears she would come for him upon any future release.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis addresses the legal mechanisms available to a convicted individual serving life without parole — mail, telephone access, proxy actors, and individuals outside the facility who accept claims of innocence. He examines the protective instruments available: no-contact orders, protective orders, and corrections-level communication restrictions. Each addresses a distinct vector of potential harm. Faddis identifies the procedural gaps that persist even with all instruments simultaneously in effect.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #ToddGabler #LifeWithoutParole #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #PrivateInvestigator #JusticeForEric
Transcribe →