Podcast
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Hosted by Real Story Media · EN
🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
500episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Jesse Ridgway's Twenty-Year Pattern Mirrors What Researchers Call Attention Addiction
Jun 1400:37:24Tap to summarizeOver a four-year period, Jesse Ridgway produced staged family violence content on YouTube under the Psycho Series brand that generated more than a thousand 911 calls from viewers who believed the depicted events were real. Upon disclosure that the content was fabricated, Ridgway stated he "never lied" and did not acknowledge the emergency responses his content provoked. That pattern — the production of increasingly extreme content designed to generate maximum audience reaction without accountability for the consequences — has continued and escalated over the subsequent decade.The documented trajectory includes StoryFire, a creator platform that acquired approximately one million users before being converted to an NFT product. A pregnancy announcement whose veracity remains unconfirmed. And an episode in which his wife underwent a medical procedure she publicly described as the worst experience of her life — within approximately 48 hours, Ridgway appeared on national television while she recovered at home. He had been filming on four separate cameras within five days of the procedure.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, with more than thirty years of clinical experience in forensic mental health, examines the behavioral pattern through the lens of current research on narcissism and social media engagement. The dopamine feedback loop associated with audience validation operates on the same neural pathways documented in substance addiction studies — producing measurable tolerance effects requiring escalating stimuli, withdrawal symptoms during periods of reduced engagement, and impaired capacity to disengage voluntarily even when the behavior produces demonstrable harm to proximate relationships.Scott addresses whether the primary reinforcer is financial or attentional — and whether that distinction retains clinical meaning after two decades of simultaneous reinforcement. She examines the role of media outlets in sustaining the cycle by treating staged events as legitimate news content. She assesses whether any individual within Ridgway's personal environment can provide sufficient competing reinforcement against what 4.3 million subscribers deliver. And she evaluates the central clinical question: whether behavioral patterns reinforced continuously over twenty years can be reversed — or whether the performed identity has functionally replaced the original.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JesseRidgway #McJuggerNuggets #PsychoSeries #ShavaunScott #AttentionAddiction #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #InfluencerExposed #Narcissism #StoryFire
Transcribe →
Aaron Spencer's Judge Documented Eleven Detective Failures And Called Every One Intentional
Jun 1400:38:25Tap to summarizeJudge Ralph Wilson Jr.'s nineteen-page order dismissing the murder charge against Aaron Spencer catalogued eleven specific failures by the lead detective and applied the most consequential legal characterization available: intentional conduct, bad faith, and a due process violation under both the federal and Arkansas state constitutions. The court specifically rejected the state's characterization of the evidence handling as negligent.The evidentiary chain at issue involves a dashcam and SD card recovered from Michael Fosler's truck — the sole potential objective record of the final encounter between Spencer and Fosler. Detective Robbie McCain removed the camera from the windshield without photographic documentation. He extracted the SD card and viewed it on his personal computer, in violation of departmental protocol — confirmed by his commanding officer — requiring that electronic evidence be submitted to the Attorney General's forensics unit without alteration. He stored the camera in an unsealed envelope in his office rather than the evidence room. The camera was not entered into evidence for over a year. No documentation accompanied any step of the process.The SD card was not present when the AG's special agent opened the submitted package. Twelve additional SD cards were recovered from Fosler's residence and vehicle during separate searches. None was identified as the dashcam card. No duplicate or record of the card's contents was ever created. The court found a "reasonable possibility" that the detective did not observe what he testified to having observed.The court identified the dashcam footage as the only potential neutral evidentiary record — given Spencer's Fifth Amendment protections and the potential impact of trauma on his daughter's testimonial capacity. Wilson also flagged a one-month discrepancy between the sheriff's office's claimed shipping date and the AG's confirmed receipt date. The state characterized this as administrative error. The court did not accept that characterization.Spencer killed Fosler after finding him with his thirteen-year-old daughter. Fosler faced 43 felony charges involving the child and was released on bond with a no-contact order in effect. The day following the dismissal, Sheriff John Staley — the thirteen-year incumbent whom Spencer defeated in the Republican primary — terminated Detective McCain, citing policy violations. The prosecuting attorney who pursued the case is retiring.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AaronSpencer #LonokeCounty #JudgeWilson #BadFaith #DashcamEvidence #Coverup #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Arkansas #JusticeForSpencer
Transcribe →
Samuel Bateman's Rescued Girls Filled Journals The FBI Seized — But Couldn't Tell Interviewers A Word
Jun 1400:54:15Tap to summarizeFollowing their removal from Samuel Bateman's FLDS offshoot, the rescued minors were interviewed by trained forensic specialists. They disclosed nothing verbally about the conduct documented in the case. Their journals — recovered during the FBI's execution of search warrants — contained detailed accounts: dates, descriptions, and names, recorded in their own handwriting. The dissociation between written and verbal disclosure represents a specific clinical phenomenon in cases involving prolonged coercive control during childhood development.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, with more than thirty years of experience in forensic mental health, domestic violence, and coercive control, examines the psychological mechanisms at work. Bateman's "atonement ceremonies" — group acts conducted under the framework of divine commandment — functioned to normalize harm within a closed belief system. The behavioral presentations visible in documentary footage that viewers have interpreted as voluntary participation reflect clinical indicators of conditioned compliance, not choice. Eight minors went willingly with Bateman's wives when they were removed from foster care — a fact that demonstrates the depth of the psychological infrastructure Bateman had constructed.The co-defendants' cases present an unresolved moral and legal question. The women convicted of facilitating harm to children were themselves raised within the FLDS system, married off as teenagers, and conditioned from birth within the same coercive framework they subsequently perpetuated. Scott and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine whether the legal system's binary framework can adequately address individuals who are simultaneously perpetrators and products of the same system.The investigative timeline preceding the FBI's intervention compounds the case's complexity. Christine Marie provided footage to local law enforcement repeatedly. The responding sergeant reportedly found the material credible but declined to act. The Short Creek community had normalized practices that constituted criminal conduct for decades. The recording that precipitated federal action came in late 2021: Bateman's own voice describing the transfer of wives to his male followers, including a minor. Christine subsequently facilitated the cooperation of Julia Johnson, a mother whose four daughters had been placed with Bateman, and assisted in physically removing the girls to enable the federal operation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SamuelBateman #FLDS #ChristineMarie #TrustMeNetflix #ShortCreek #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #CultTrauma #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
Samuel Bateman Ran His Cult From A Federal Detention Cell
Jun 1400:41:52Tap to summarizeFrom inside a federal detention facility, Samuel Bateman maintained sufficient control over his followers that three women risked life sentences to execute his directives — communicated through a shared electronic tablet. That detail anchors the behavioral analysis of a case where the mechanisms of coercive control operated across physical separation, institutional confinement, and the threat of decades-long sentences for the people carrying out his instructions.Robin Dreeke, retired chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examine the operational playbook Bateman employed to construct his FLDS offshoot in the Short Creek community on the Utah-Arizona border. Bateman — homeless and without resources — entered a community still destabilized by Warren Jeffs' imprisonment. He appropriated Jeffs' prophetic authority by claiming Jeffs communicated through him. His requirement of public confessions functioned as a compliance mechanism: each confession created psychological investment that made departure increasingly costly. His insistence on being filmed reflected identity construction — the need for an external audience to validate the role he'd assigned himself. Law enforcement questioned him on two separate occasions and did not pursue charges.Christine Marie was inside Bateman's world with a camera for an extended period. She and her husband had relocated to Short Creek to document the community's recovery from the Jeffs era. Bateman identified their presence as an opportunity and granted access. Christine had previously experienced coercive control under another self-styled religious leader and recognized Bateman's behavioral patterns from firsthand experience. She understood what performance of trust was required to maintain access and preserve the evidentiary record she was building.In her first extended interview, Christine addresses the operational and psychological cost of sustained embedded access — the process of earning trust within a paranoid community, the daily discipline of entering an environment where documented harm was occurring, and the internal transition from documentary filmmaker to active participant in building the evidentiary foundation that contributed to Bateman's fifty-year federal sentence.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#SamuelBateman #FLDS #ChristineMarie #TrustMeNetflix #ShortCreek #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #CoerciveControl #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
Mackenzie Shirilla's Data Recorder Captured Full Throttle And Zero Braking Into A Building
Jun 1300:50:01Tap to summarizeThe vehicle's event data recorder documented the accelerator at full capacity, zero brake application, and a direct trajectory into a commercial building in Strongsville, Ohio at approximately one hundred miles per hour. Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan were pronounced dead at the scene. Mackenzie Shirilla survived. The defendant never provided a statement to law enforcement and did not testify at trial. The case was built entirely on physical and digital evidence.The evidentiary foundation included the data recorder findings, prior threats documented in text messages — Shirilla told Russo weeks before the crash she would "crash this car right now" — and evidence that Shirilla had driven to the same dead-end road days before the fatal night. Monitored jail calls between the defendant and her mother Natalie Shirilla, conducted in a private coded language, were intercepted and decoded by investigators. According to prosecutors, the decoded communications revealed the defendant asking whether they could inform police she had experienced a seizure prior to the crash. The seizure theory — attributed to a blood pressure condition called POTS — became the defense's primary argument. The court rejected it, finding the defendant's actions "controlled, methodical, deliberate, intentional and purposeful."Post-conviction institutional records document thirty-six conduct violations in under three years at the Ohio Reformatory for Women, with guilty findings on thirty-two. Citations include unauthorized medication, altered prison clothing, contraband, refusing work assignments, and more than one hundred video visits with an unapproved former inmate conducted under another individual's name. On recorded calls, the defendant characterizes herself as the third person harmed and continues to describe the incident as a car accident. She has declined participation in institutional rehabilitation programs.The family's conduct compounds the post-conviction record. Natalie Shirilla stated on a monitored call that prison programs are intended for "people convicted of crimes like actual criminals." She characterized the Russo family as "evil." Steve Shirilla publicly challenged the evidence on a podcast while the court's written findings remain in the public record. His contract at Mary Queen of Peace School was not renewed by the Diocese of Cleveland following his appearance in Netflix's The Crash.Coffindaffer and Dreeke examine the complete behavioral arc — from the pre-crash threats and rehearsal drive through the decoded calls and institutional conduct — and assess whether anyone in the defendant's environment has provided genuine accountability at any stage.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #DataRecorder #Strongsville #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
Anna Kepner's Cruise Ship Trial Hinges On A DNA Gap The FBI Admitted
Jun 1300:33:52Tap to summarizeThe presiding judge in the Anna Kepner case stated from the bench that he would not characterize the government's case as strong, using the phrase "a much closer call" with "various defenses." That assessment — from a federal judge in a first-degree murder case carrying a potential life sentence — establishes the evidentiary landscape heading into the September trial.The statistical DNA evidence is substantial: the probability of a random match to Timothy Hudson is reported at 120 sextillion to one. However, an FBI agent testified on the record that he is unaware of any DNA directly connecting Hudson to the mechanism that caused Anna Kepner's death. The distinction between identification-level DNA — establishing Hudson's presence — and cause-of-death DNA — establishing his connection to the act of killing — is the evidentiary gap defense attorney Eric Faddis identifies as the central battleground for trial.The unsealed detention hearing transcript, spanning approximately one hundred forty-five pages, disclosed the prosecution's complete theory. The timeline is built on CCTV footage, phone records, and Snapchat activity showing Anna posting at 8:14 p.m. Prosecutors allege she and Hudson were alone in their shared cabin for approximately three hours before he was observed leaving. The transcript also confirmed that a second juvenile male had contact with Anna aboard the vessel — the FBI tested his DNA and excluded him. The defense has indicated it will present this at trial.The reported pre-incident behavioral history introduces additional complexity. Public reporting documents that Anna's ex-boyfriend stated Hudson attempted to climb on top of her during a FaceTime call, was allegedly fixated on her, and reportedly carried a large knife. Anna's aunt stated publicly that Anna did not want to go on the cruise and was afraid of Hudson. Despite these reported warnings, Anna was placed in a shared stateroom with no parental presence.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer addresses the prosecution's "without any warning" characterization against the reported behavioral pattern and examines the forensic significance of deliberate concealment paired with claimed memory loss. Faddis assesses whether the unsealed transcript provided the defense with the prosecution's complete strategy months before trial.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CarnivalHorizon #CruiseShipCase #DNAEvidence #FederalTrial #EricFaddis #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
What Do Eric Richins' Two Valentine's Day Phone Calls Reveal About The Kouri Richins Case?
Jun 1300:40:53Tap to summarizeFollowing the Valentine's Day 2022 incident at the Richins residence, Eric Richins contacted two friends on the same afternoon. To one, he presented the event as a humorous allergic reaction — the conversation included laughter. To the other, he communicated genuine fear and stated directly that he believed Kouri Richins was attempting to poison him. Same event. Same individual. Same timeframe. Two fundamentally different characterizations.That bifurcation is psychologically significant. It indicates not denial but dual-track processing — the simultaneous maintenance of two contradictory narratives about the same lived reality. One narrative preserved functional normalcy. The other acknowledged existential threat. The capacity to toggle between them was the mechanism by which Eric continued to operate within the household.The evidence establishes that Eric recognized the threat well before Valentine's Day. He contacted his sister Katie from overseas years prior and stated Kouri had attempted to harm him. He retained divorce counsel. He revised his will and restructured his estate to protect his three minor children outside Kouri's access. He informed family members that if anything happened to him, Kouri was responsible. Katie Richins testified at sentencing that Eric's decision to remain was driven by a specific calculation: he believed that if Kouri received equal custody in a divorce, his sons would lose the only protective barrier between themselves and the danger he'd identified. Father as human shield.The children's sentencing statements provide the interior view of the household Eric was attempting to shield them within — locked rooms, a sibling assuming caretaker functions, animals dying from neglect, and children who addressed the defendant as "Kouri" rather than as a parent.The defendant's forty-five-minute allocution addressed those same children directly. She characterized the verdict as an "absolute lie," acknowledged the affair while describing the marriage as a love that "never failed," and delivered a closing instruction: "Never apologize for something you didn't do." The psychological analysis identifies this not as a farewell but as a directive — language designed to operate within those children's developing belief systems for years, delivered by a mind that cannot concede and aimed at the only audience the defendant believes remains persuadable.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylPoisoning #ForensicPsychology #ValentinesDay #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #SummitCounty #JusticeForEric
Transcribe →
How Many Parents Are Raising the Next Mackenzie Shirilla?
Jun 1300:24:13Tap to summarizeMackenzie Shirilla isn’t a one-off. She’s a product. And the machine that built her is running in households everywhere.Shirilla is serving fifteen years to life at the Ohio Reformatory for Women for killing her boyfriend Dominic Russo and their friend Davion Flanagan after driving a hundred miles an hour into a brick wall in Strongsville, Ohio. A judge found it deliberate. The Ohio Supreme Court declined her appeal. The conviction is settled. The question this episode takes on is different: how does a seventeen-year-old get built into someone capable of this?The prison calls answer it. Mackenzie tells her mother Natalie she doesn’t need to be rehabilitated. Natalie agrees — rehabilitation is for “actual criminals,” she says. On another call, Natalie refers to the family of the young man her daughter was convicted of killing as “evil.” Her father Steve went on the Netflix documentary The Crash, endorsed Mackenzie’s marijuana use on camera, lost his teaching position at a Catholic school, and blamed the school for how it handled the situation. Nobody in this family has said the words: this happened, it was wrong, and we have to face it.Every parent listening knows a version of this kid. Not a killer — that’s the extreme end. But the kid whose consequences were always intercepted before they could teach anything. The kid who never sat with discomfort long enough to grow from it. Layer social media on top — curated identities, zero real-world experience, mythologies built from follower counts — and you get a generation of people who have never been stress-tested against anything real. A fellow inmate compared Mackenzie to Regina George: daily makeup, social positioning, running prison like a school hallway. The persona survives even when reality stops bending. This episode pulls the machine apart and asks the question no parent wants to sit with: how short is the distance between supporting your kid and building someone who can’t survive the real world?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TrueCrimeToday #Netflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #TrueCrime #ParentalEnabling #StrongsvilleOhio #TheCrashDocumentary
Transcribe →
Nick Reiner Took His Own Trustees To Court From A Jail Cell
Jun 1200:48:07Tap to summarizeThe newest Nick Reiner trial development is a 136-page probate petition filed from custody — naming both his outgoing and incoming trustees and demanding the release of more than $1.5 million held in the trust his parents established at his birth. In this extended episode, defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis conducts a complete legal examination of the dispute, from the filing's strongest claims to the family's most viable countermeasures.On the merits: the petition characterizes the trust's distributions as "mandatory and unconditional" — half payable at age thirty, a threshold Nick Reiner crossed more than two years before Rob and Michele Reiner were killed, with no payment made per the filing. Faddis evaluates that language under California trust law, the petition's invocation of the presumption of innocence — Nick has pleaded not guilty to both first-degree murder counts — the counsel-of-choice argument anchored to attorney Alan Jackson's declared readiness to resume the defense, and the reported procedural pathway by which an unopposed petition could be granted without hearing.On the opposition: trustee Paul Kanin's resignation following stated concerns about Nick's decision-making capacity, the appointment of successor Jodi Montgomery — formerly Britney Spears' conservator — and her requested custodial meeting, the operation of the slayer statute prior to any verdict, the reported freeze of the larger Reiner family trusts, the formal opposition available to Jake and Romy Reiner, and the recoverability of funds spent on defense should a conviction follow.The episode concludes with the Alex Murdaugh retrial's new presiding judge, Debra McCaslin: her reported professional history with lead defense counsel Dick Harpootlian, the disqualification standards that history implicates, and her authority over the financial-crimes evidentiary limits ordered by the South Carolina Supreme Court.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NickReiner #RobReiner #TrueCrimeToday #ReinerCase #EricFaddis #ProbateCourt #TrueCrime #AlexMurdaugh #DebraMcCaslin #TrustLitigation
Transcribe →
Why Was Alex Murdaugh's Retrial Handed to a Judge Who Says She Ignores the Internet?
Jun 1200:24:13Tap to summarizeThe first Alex Murdaugh trial wasn't just decided in a courtroom — it was swallowed by everything around it. A clerk of court writing a book about the case while she was supposed to be guarding the jury. Cameras in every corner of Walterboro. Podcasters, streamers, and true crime creators turning a small South Carolina town into a content farm. And when the dust settled, the state Supreme Court threw the whole verdict out, in part because of what happened to that jury outside the evidence.Now meet the woman in charge of making sure it never happens again. Judge Debra McCaslin wrote on her own judicial questionnaire that she is not a fan of social media and very rarely looks at it. The state of South Carolina just handed the most internet-obsessed criminal case in America to a judge who, by her own account, doesn't engage with any of it. In this Alex Murdaugh retrial breakdown, we ask whether that makes her exactly the wrong person for this moment — or the only kind of judge who can survive it. A jurist who can't be rattled by the noise might be the cure for a case that was poisoned by noise. Or she might be walking into a storm she's never bothered to look at.We also get into who McCaslin is beneath the questionnaire: the self-made path that took her from a senator's office to her own law practice to the bench, her overlooked history with one of the lawyers now defending Murdaugh, and the rulings she'll make on venue, evidence, and a possible death penalty fight that will define trial number two before it starts.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughRetrial #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #MurdaughTrialUpdate #SouthCarolina #MediaCircus #CourtTV #TrueCrimeNews #JusticeForMaggieAndPaul
Transcribe →