Podcast
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Hosted by Real Story Media · EN
🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
500episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
What Clinical Evidence Was Never Presented At The Mackenzie Shirilla Trial?
Jun 700:37:17Tap to summarizeThe prosecution presented Mackenzie Shirilla's text messages and threatening statements as evidence of premeditated intent. The trial court characterized her as "hell on wheels" and convicted her on four counts of murder. No clinical or psychological expert testimony was presented to provide an alternative framework for interpreting the defendant's behavior — specifically, whether a seventeen-year-old's volatile conduct represents a fixed personality pathology or an adolescent brain that has not completed neurological development.Shavaun Scott — licensed psychotherapist, author of The Minds of Mass Killers, with experience in forensic settings, domestic violence shelters, and crisis intervention — provides the clinical analysis the trial never heard. She identifies narcissistic presentation that clinically masks fragility rather than indicating calculated predation. She distinguishes between personality disorder and adolescent neurodevelopmental immaturity — the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control and consequence assessment, does not reach full maturation until approximately the mid-twenties. The texts and threats the prosecution relied upon reveal specific clinical information about Shirilla's internal psychological state that differs materially from the inferences the prosecution drew from them.The post-conviction landscape presents a separate set of strategic concerns. Shirilla's participation in Netflix's The Crash was intended to present her narrative publicly. Within days of release, a fellow inmate provided a contradictory account of Shirilla's behavior in custody — descriptions fundamentally inconsistent with the on-camera presentation. The documentary reignited the prosecution's characterization rather than countering it. Shirilla's pre-incarceration social media presence continues to circulate publicly as characterological evidence. The victims' families have increased their public visibility.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta evaluates the post-conviction decision-making. Shirilla's appellate remedies are exhausted. Her earliest parole eligibility is 2037. Her consistent claim of amnesia regarding the crash may be clinically accurate but is strategically counterproductive before a parole board that requires demonstrated accountability. Motta examines whether the documentary, the public persona, and the memory claim collectively advance or impede the prospect of eventual release — and whether the current trajectory reflects competent post-conviction guidance.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ForensicPsychology
Transcribe →
What Household Evidence Could Replace Financial Testimony At The Murdaugh Retrial?
Jun 700:43:34Tap to summarizeThe South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling sharply limits the financial crimes testimony that consumed twelve and a half hours of the original trial. The prosecution's evidentiary framework for retrial must compensate for that loss. One category of evidence that received limited examination the first time — granular household testimony from the person with the most sustained access to the Murdaugh home — may carry substantially greater weight in a second proceeding.Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson served as the Murdaugh family's housekeeper for approximately twenty years. She testified for three hours at the original trial. Prosecutors examined her on specific items — a shirt, a towel, pajamas. In this exclusive interview, Simpson identifies observations from the morning after the murders that were never raised during her testimony: the condition of the house when she entered approximately twelve hours after the killings, items that had been moved or cleaned, and domestic details inconsistent with the normal state of the household — details a forensic team would likely overlook but a daily presence in the home would recognize immediately.Simpson distinguishes between indicators of grief and indicators of scene management. She addresses the defendant's subsequent attempt to alter the shirt narrative months after the murders. She also identifies the evidentiary loss created by the sale and alteration of the Moselle property — and the irreplaceable role her twenty years of spatial memory plays for a jury that can no longer walk the scene as it existed.Simpson also presents a specific theory of the crime that directly addresses the defense team's third-party suspect strategy. She posits that the defendant maintained a Plan A involving another individual's presence at Moselle the night of the killings, and when that arrangement collapsed, executed the plan independently and constructed a narrative around the boat crash families. Her basis is two decades of observing the defendant's operational pattern — the consistent use of intermediaries in financial transactions, including Curtis Eddie Smith's documented role in cashing approximately four hundred thirty-seven checks totaling roughly $2.4 million. Simpson argues that the defendant's established pattern of using others as instruments makes an independently executed crime inconsistent with his documented behavioral history.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughRetrial #MaggieMurdaugh #Moselle #PaulMurdaugh #CurtisSmith #MurdaughEvidence #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
Do The Defense Failures In The Mackenzie Shirilla Case Meet The Ineffective Counsel Standard?
Jun 700:47:55Tap to summarizeMackenzie Shirilla's defense counsel identified a medical condition during the proceedings that could have provided an alternative explanation for the Strongsville crash. No expert was called to testify. No medical records were entered into evidence. The prosecution's intent theory — that surveillance footage proved prior calculation and design — went unchallenged on the specific point most likely to introduce reasonable doubt.Following the conviction on four counts of murder for the crash that killed Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan, a neurologist reviewed Shirilla's medical records and identified evidence consistent with a medical episode: loss of consciousness, absence of head trauma, and low blood oxygen levels. That expert opinion was submitted as part of a post-conviction petition. The court denied the petition on procedural grounds — the filing exceeded Ohio's 365-day statutory deadline by one day. The medical evidence was never evaluated on its merits.Additional defense failures are documented. The prosecution presented an incident on I-71 as evidence of prior intent — a witness testified that Shirilla threatened to crash the vehicle. Text message evidence showed Shirilla provided an alternative account to the victim's mother, attributing the steering intervention to Dominic Russo. Two contradictory accounts of the same incident. The defense did not challenge the prosecution's version. The prosecution's forensic examiner testified to the absence of mechanical failure. The defense presented no independent accident reconstruction analysis.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta evaluates each identified failure against the Strickland standard for ineffective assistance of counsel — whether counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and whether the deficiency prejudiced the outcome.Robin Dreeke applies FBI behavioral analysis to the competing narratives surrounding the case. The Netflix documentary presents Shirilla as remorseful and amnesic. A fellow inmate who spent six months in proximity describes behavioral characteristics inconsistent with that portrayal. The families seek certainty. The prosecution maintains the surveillance footage is dispositive. Dreeke examines whether any participant's version of events is shaped more by psychological need than evidentiary support — and whether the same judge presiding over conviction and post-conviction review creates structural bias.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #IneffectiveCounsel #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
Does The Physical Evidence In The Murdaugh Murders Point To A Second Shooter?
Jun 600:34:52Tap to summarizeThe South Carolina Supreme Court's unanimous reversal of Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions reset the legal record — and with it, the evidentiary question that a second jury will have to answer without twelve hours of financial crimes testimony supporting the prosecution's narrative. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer approaches that question as a clean-slate exercise: strip the name from the file and evaluate what the physical evidence actually supports.Two victims were shot at the dog kennels on a remote hunting property. Two distinct firearms were used — a shotgun and a rifle. Neither weapon has been recovered. No blood was found on the defendant. The defense has consistently argued that no single shooter could have executed the crime as the state described it. Paul Murdaugh's prior legal entanglements — including a boating incident that resulted in a young woman's death — generated a documented set of unresolved grievances that investigators never fully pursued. Coffindaffer evaluates the two-weapon theory, examines where the physical scene points absent the financial motive framework, and assesses whether the prosecution's case survives substantive scrutiny under the evidentiary limitations the Supreme Court has imposed for retrial.The human dimension of the reversal is addressed through an exclusive interview with Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson — the Murdaugh family's housekeeper of twenty years and a key prosecution witness at the original trial. Simpson's testimony included her recollection of the shirt Alex Murdaugh wore the morning of June 7th, 2021, a wet towel found by the shower the following day, and her observations of Maggie Murdaugh's emotional state as Alex's financial situation deteriorated. The jury that heard her testimony convicted in under three hours.Upon learning of the Supreme Court's reversal, Simpson drove directly to Maggie Murdaugh's gravesite. In her first interview since the ruling, she addresses whether she remains the same witness she was in 2023, what Becky Hill's conduct cost the people closest to the case, and whether three years of reflection have altered what she is prepared to testify to at a second trial. The retrial's outcome may depend significantly on whether witnesses like Simpson present more forcefully under fair conditions than they did under compromised ones.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #JenniferCoffindaffe
Transcribe →
How Did Kouri Richins Maintain A False Identity For Fourteen Months After Killing Eric?
Jun 600:37:25Tap to summarizeThe psychological profile that emerges from the Kouri Richins case presents a specific form of compartmentalization that forensic professionals have documented but rarely encounter at this operational duration. For approximately fourteen months following Eric Richins' death, the defendant maintained a constructed identity — grieving mother, children's book author, television interview subject — that was sufficiently convincing to deceive every personal acquaintance who subsequently testified at trial.The behavioral evidence suggests this was not conventional deception in the performative sense. The psychology at work involves a migration into an alternate self-narrative so complete that the individual operates within it as reality. The grieving-mother identity functioned as her lived experience. The actions that preceded it — the fentanyl, the cocktail, the death — existed in a psychologically sealed compartment she did not access in her daily presentation. That dissociative architecture explains the 911 call's emotional quality, the social gathering the following day, the Google searches for luxury incarceration facilities and insurance claim timelines conducted without apparent distress, and the television appearances promoting a children's grief book written by the person responsible for the grief.The escalation pattern preceding the crime follows a documented forensic trajectory. The Valentine's Day attempt — which Eric Richins survived after experiencing respiratory distress and reportedly reaching for an EpiPen — did not produce reconsideration. It produced refinement. Seventeen days elapsed. The defendant continued to cohabitate, co-parent, and conduct professional real estate transactions. The second attempt employed approximately five times the lethal dose. The psychological mechanism that enables a failed homicide attempt to generate a more effective plan rather than retreat is consistent with a decision-making framework in which the target has been fully dehumanized — reduced from a person to a financial variable.The underlying financial architecture supports that analysis: approximately $4.5 million in undisclosed debt, a concurrent relationship with Robert Josh Grossmann that functioned as preparation for a post-death life, and insurance policies acquired on the victim's life without his knowledge. The jury required less than three hours.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylPoisoning #ForensicPsychology #Compartmentalization #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #SummitCounty #JusticeForEric
Transcribe →
How Does A Federal Judge Justify Releasing Anna Kepner's Accused Cruise Ship Killer?
Jun 600:33:32Tap to summarizeAt the detention hearing in the Anna Kepner case, the presiding judge acknowledged that if Timothy Hudson were an adult facing the same charges under the same evidentiary circumstances, he would almost certainly be detained pending trial. The judge characterized the case as "a different animal." He then concluded the hearing without issuing a ruling on detention — and the defendant, a sixteen-year-old charged as an adult with first-degree murder in federal court, was released.The evidentiary record unsealed in the proceedings is substantial. Security footage tracks the defendant's movements aboard the Carnival Horizon the night of Anna Kepner's death. A phone belonging to the defendant was recovered from a trash receptacle in a smashed condition. DNA analysis reportedly corroborates the prosecution's theory. Anna Kepner's body was found concealed beneath a bed in the stateroom she shared with the defendant — a ship operating in international waters, establishing federal jurisdiction.The release conditions have generated procedural concern. The defendant is prohibited from unsupervised contact with minors. Prosecutors informed the court that two minor children reportedly reside in the home designated as the defendant's placement. That apparent conflict was raised in open proceedings.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer addresses the forensic challenges unique to maritime crime scenes — evidence collection aboard a vessel that subsequently docks and discharges thousands of passengers, chain of custody complications inherent to shipboard investigations, and the enhanced significance of the FBI's initial evidence recovery process under those constraints. She provides her professional assessment of the evidence profile as disclosed in unsealed filings.A criminal defense attorney examines the procedural framework governing juvenile defendants charged as adults in federal court — a circumstance federal courts encounter rarely. The analysis addresses the tension between juvenile detention standards and adult charge severity, the strategic implications of the defendant's waiver of juvenile proceedings, and the practical consequences of the detention decision for the prosecution's trial preparation. The trial is scheduled for September 8th.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CarnivalHorizon #CruiseShipDeath #FederalCourt #FBI #DetentionHearing #JusticeForAnna #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
Can Wendi Adelson's Limited Immunity In The Dan Markel Case Be Broken?
Jun 600:41:17Tap to summarizeWendi Adelson testified under limited immunity at every trial connected to the murder of Dan Markel. That immunity holds only if she told the truth. If prosecutors can establish that she provided false testimony under oath, the agreement is voidable — and everything she said on the stand becomes potential evidence against her rather than a shield protecting her.Five individuals have been convicted in the murder-for-hire conspiracy. Charlie Adelson and Donna Adelson are serving life sentences. The hitmen and the go-between are incarcerated. Prosecutors have designated both Wendi Adelson and her father Harvey as unindicted co-conspirators — a designation made in open court across multiple proceedings. Following Donna Adelson's conviction, the State Attorney indicated that charging decisions regarding additional participants were forthcoming. Months have elapsed without public action.The prosecutorial silence carries specific legal significance. A defense attorney and former prosecutor examines the possible interpretations: active grand jury proceedings operating under seal, ongoing investigation requiring additional evidence, or an evidentiary gap the prosecution cannot bridge. Harvey Adelson's documented presence at an airport with one-way tickets to a non-extradition country constitutes circumstantial evidence of consciousness of guilt — a fact with substantial persuasive value before any future jury. A pending appellate proceeding in Florida could alter the legal calculus for all remaining participants in the alleged conspiracy.The psychological analysis of Donna Adelson's role provides context for understanding the family dynamics that allegedly produced this conspiracy. Forensic examination identifies a narcissistic framework operating over decades — one in which boundaries were reinterpreted as aggression, familial conflict was recast as existential threat, and Dan Markel was allegedly dehumanized from a custody opponent into an obstacle to be eliminated. The progression from resentment to rationalization to alleged participation in murder-for-hire follows a documented psychological trajectory in which self-deception functions as the primary enabling mechanism.Dan Markel was a Florida State law professor killed in his own garage in 2014. The conspiracy has been prosecuted extensively. The question of whether it has been prosecuted completely remains open.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DanMarkel #WendiAdelson #DonnaAdelson #CharlieAdelson #HarveyAdelson #MarkelMurder #LimitedImmunity #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FloridaCrime
Transcribe →
Did Mackenzie Shirilla and Her Mom Use a Secret Code to Fool Police?
Jun 600:37:08Tap to summarizeProsecutors hired a team to decode phone calls between Mackenzie Shirilla and her mother Natalie — calls where the two spoke in a private language built to hide what they were saying on monitored lines. What they found became evidence at trial.The coded communication is one piece of a larger pattern now laid bare by recorded prison calls and institutional records released in the wake of the Netflix documentary The Crash. Mackenzie, convicted of killing Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan after driving into a Strongsville building at approximately one hundred miles per hour, has accumulated thirty-six conduct violations behind bars. On recorded calls from inside the Ohio Reformatory for Women, she refers to herself as the third person harmed by the crash. She tells her mother she does not need rehabilitation. She wants an iPad. She wants to be a life coach. She trashes the town that lost two of its young people and calls the residents sad and depressing.And Natalie matches her at every turn. She calls the Russo family “evil” for their victim impact statements. She tells Mackenzie that rehabilitation is for “actual criminals” — not her. She mocks Angelo Russo’s court statement and says it made her own sympathy disappear. Steve Shirilla, on administrative leave from a Cleveland Catholic school after the documentary aired, argues his daughter’s innocence on a podcast while the judge’s verdict — “controlled, methodical, deliberate, intentional and purposeful” — remains a matter of public record.Tony Brueski traces the through line from the coded calls to the prison record to the family’s public statements and asks the question the evidence keeps answering: when no one in a person’s life will hold them accountable, what reason would they ever have to change?Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #StrongsvilleCrash #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #OhioCrime #NatalieShirilla
Transcribe →
What Mackenzie Shirilla's Prison Record Could Cost Her at Parole
Jun 500:56:19Tap to summarizeTwo cases raising different questions about how the system processes evidence — one institutional, one forensic. Mackenzie Shirilla's family is generating a growing record on monitored prison calls that defense attorney Eric Faddis says the parole board will scrutinize. In the Anna Kepner cruise ship case, a federal judge stated the prosecution's evidence is not as strong as it appears, despite DNA odds of 120 sextillion to one.Shirilla has accumulated thirty-six conduct violations at the Ohio Reformatory for Women since her August 2023 conviction, with guilty findings on thirty-two. Her father Steve's teaching contract at a Cleveland Catholic school was not renewed following his appearance in a Netflix documentary. Her mother Natalie was recorded on a prison call referring to the Russo family as "evil people." Prosecutors decoded separate calls in which Mackenzie and Natalie used a fabricated language to circumvent monitoring, including an exchange about claiming Shirilla had a seizure.In the Kepner case, a hundred and forty-five pages of unsealed transcript from a detention hearing placed the government's complete theory on the public record before a September trial. The DNA match points at Timothy Hudson, but an FBI agent testified he cannot connect it to cause of death. Magistrate Judge Torres stated he would not call the government's case strong and characterized it as "a much closer call."Faddis provides legal analysis on the parole implications of Shirilla's institutional record and her family's public conduct, Natalie's potential legal exposure, and the evidentiary gap between DNA identification and proof of cause of death in the Kepner prosecution.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #AnnaKepner #ShirillaNetflix #KepnerCruiseShip #TimothyHudson #TheCrash #DNAEvidence #EricFaddis #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime
Transcribe →
The 'Walk the Dog' Letter Tells You Everything About How Kouri Richins' Brain Works
Jun 300:14:55Tap to summarize"Walk the Dog!!" written across the top of a six-page letter found hidden in Kouri Richins' jail cell. Inside: instructions for coaching her brother's testimony. The defense she should never have scripted.But the letter itself isn't the most revealing piece. The "fictional novel" defense is. Because when Kouri was confronted on a recorded jail call, she didn't pause. She didn't stumble. She produced a complete alternative explanation instantly — fictional novel, Mexican prison setting, Crest Whitestrips smuggled in by her attorney — like an immune system generating antibodies on contact with a pathogen.This episode traces the psychological reflex that drove every post-arrest behavior: the letters, the calls, the fired attorneys, the message to an admirer about "exposing" the prosecution and the judge and the Richins family. Not strategy. Compulsion. A narrative machine that can't be turned off because the narrative IS the self. When story-production stops, the identity collapses. So it runs. From a jail cell. On recorded lines. No matter the cost.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #Psychology #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FentanylPoisoning #SummitCounty #TrueCrimeCommunity #Justice———
Transcribe →