Podcast
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Hosted by Real Story Media · EN
🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates.
🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why.
If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.
500episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Can The Nancy Guthrie Investigation Be Taken From The Sheriff Entirely?
May 3000:32:46Tap to summarizeThe Pima County Sheriff has confirmed he is no longer in direct communication with Nancy Guthrie's family. The FBI has assumed the role of sole point of contact. In a case where an 84-year-old woman has been missing for over three months — allegedly taken against her will from her Tucson-area home — the transfer of family communication away from the lead local agency raises significant procedural and jurisdictional questions.The known evidence is substantial. Blood confirmed as Nancy Guthrie's was found on her porch. Doorbell camera footage captured a masked, armed figure — footage the FBI reportedly recovered from backend data because the family lacked a recording subscription. Her pacemaker disconnected from its monitoring application in the early morning hours. Her phone, wallet, and daily medication were left behind. No arrest has been made. No suspect has been publicly identified.The inter-agency conflict is now public record. The FBI Director stated his agency was denied access to the investigation for four days. The Pima County Sheriff maintains federal agents were present from the outset. The crime scene was allegedly released prematurely. A sergeant reportedly without homicide investigation experience was assigned as lead.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the operational significance of the communication shift — what it reveals about investigative control, trust dynamics between agencies, and the practical implications for case progress. She assesses the sheriff's public claim that the investigation is "getting closer."Former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis addresses the family's potential legal remedies. The Guthrie family — cleared by law enforcement and offering a $1 million reward — has been targeted by content creators who allegedly built audiences through fabricated accusations. Media outlets amplified unverified ransom communications that may have compromised the active investigation. Faddis examines potential defamation claims, county liability, and whether Arizona law provides a mechanism to transfer investigative authority away from the sheriff's department. He also addresses what Arizona's victim rights statutes reportedly guarantee families in active investigations.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBI #ChrisNanos #PimaCountySheriff #JenniferCoffindaffer #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonArizona
Transcribe →
How Did A Private Investigator Break The Kouri Richins Case Wide Open?
May 3000:45:31Tap to summarizeTodd Gabler spent 34 years as a private investigator working exclusively for the defense. He had never taken a prosecution-side case. Eric Richins' family retained him on a civil matter — and the phone records he obtained in the initial weeks altered the trajectory of the entire criminal investigation.The billing records documented sustained contact between Kouri Richins and a housekeeper with an active criminal record who was failing court-ordered drug testing — during the months preceding and following Eric Richins' death. Law enforcement had not yet obtained those records. Gabler identified the pattern, subsequently conducted approximately 50 interviews, tracked multiple vehicles, and assembled evidentiary material that contributed to breaking open a stalled criminal investigation. This marks the first public interview with the investigator who was inside the case prior to any charges being filed.The post-conviction conduct documented in the record raises distinct concerns about ongoing threat. Prior to sentencing, a message attributed to the defendant was included in the prosecution's filing: she stated her intention to "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." She wrote, "They picked the wrong one." She allegedly authored correspondence from jail directing a family member to provide false testimony. She faces accusations of witness intimidation. Her thirteen-year-old son testified to the court that he fears she would come for him upon any future release.Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis addresses the legal mechanisms available to a convicted individual serving life without parole — mail, telephone access, proxy actors, and individuals outside the facility who accept claims of innocence. He examines the protective instruments available: no-contact orders, protective orders, and corrections-level communication restrictions. Each addresses a distinct vector of potential harm. Faddis identifies the procedural gaps that persist even with all instruments simultaneously in effect.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#KouriRichins #EricRichins #ToddGabler #LifeWithoutParole #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #PrivateInvestigator #JusticeForEric
Transcribe →
Why Won’t South Carolina Unseal the Files That Could Prove Murdaugh’s Jury Was Rigged?
May 2300:18:58Tap to summarizeThree years of sealed records. Denied FOIA requests. A state investigation that found nothing — followed by a Supreme Court ruling that found everything. Something doesn’t add up in the Murdaugh jury tampering case, and the files that could explain it are locked behind a protective order that may have just lost its justification.In this episode, I trace the full arc from Becky Hill’s pre-trial book deal planning to the fabricated Facebook post that allegedly got the one undecided juror removed on the morning of deliberations — swinging the verdict from a likely hung jury to a unanimous conviction in three hours. I follow the anonymous email that started the chain of events to its alleged source, and I look at who had financial incentives aligned with a guilty verdict beyond just one clerk who wanted a lake house.The defense now has subpoena power through a federal civil rights lawsuit against Hill. The egg juror’s attorney filed a new motion the same afternoon demanding the sealed investigative records be released. And Murdaugh’s attorneys are publicly asking the question that prosecutors apparently never pursued: was Hill acting alone, or was she the part of this that was too obvious to keep hidden? The sealed files may hold the answer — and that might be exactly why they’re still sealed.Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #EggJuror #MyraCrosby #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #SouthCarolina #MurdaughRetrial
Transcribe →
Richins Appeal And Murdaugh Federal Lawsuit: Two Cases Testing The Limits Of Post-Conviction Law
May 2200:57:57Tap to summarizeTwo post-conviction legal battles are testing different pressure points in the American criminal justice system.In Utah, Kouri Richins — sentenced to life without parole for the aggravated murder of her husband Eric Richins — has secured a twenty-eight-day extension to file a motion for a new trial and faces twenty-six additional pending felony charges in a separate financial crimes prosecution. Her pre-sentencing communications stating she intended to "expose" everyone involved in her conviction raise substantive questions about post-conviction conduct and the adequacy of existing protective mechanisms.In South Carolina, Alex Murdaugh's defense team filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against former Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill in federal court — five days after the state Supreme Court unanimously overturned his murder convictions based on Hill's "shocking jury interference." The complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages totaling six hundred thousand dollars, but the defense has publicly stated the primary objective is civil discovery authority.Eric Faddis evaluates the appellate posture of the Richins case, the legal protections available to those identified in her communications, the mechanics and strategic purpose of the Murdaugh federal lawsuit, and the parallel-track implications of civil discovery running alongside a criminal retrial in which the Attorney General has publicly stated the death penalty is under consideration.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#KouriRichins #AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #EricRichins #TrueCrime #LifeWithoutParole #MurdaughRetrial #JuryTampering #FentanylMurder #HiddenKillers
Transcribe →
The Cruise Industry Lobby Spent $70 Million To Protect Predatory Crew Members From Exposure
May 2200:23:38Tap to summarizeHow does an industry avoid accountability for decades while carrying tens of millions of passengers a year? It spends $70 million lobbying Congress. It hires former FBI and Coast Guard officials. It registers ships abroad to dodge U.S. taxes and jurisdiction. It fights reform legislation and wins. It settles lawsuits behind NDAs. And it issues identical zero-tolerance statements every time a crew member is caught. This final episode of Cruising with Predators names the machine. The money trail, the revolving door, the CVSSA’s limitations, and the foreign-flag shield are all laid bare. Then the reforms: device screening, an international registry, prosecution before deportation, independent investigations, ending NDAs in cases involving minors, and licensing standards for youth programs. Each tied to a case from this series. The industry built this system. Families can demand it be rebuilt. A Hidden Killers investigation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CruiseLobby #CLIA #CruiseReform #NDA #CruisingWithPredators #CruiseSafety #ChildProtection #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MandatoryScreening
Transcribe →Murdaugh v. Hill: How Does A Section 1983 Lawsuit Change The Retrial Landscape?
May 2200:15:43Tap to summarizeFive days after the South Carolina Supreme Court's unanimous ruling overturning Alex Murdaugh's double murder convictions, his defense team filed a seventeen-page Section 1983 civil rights complaint against former Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in Charleston.The complaint alleges Hill, acting under color of state law in her capacity as elected clerk, deprived Murdaugh of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights through deliberate jury interference — conduct the Supreme Court characterized as "shocking" and described as Hill placing "her fingers on the scales of justice."Eric Faddis examines the legal architecture of the federal civil action, including the evidentiary standard Murdaugh must meet, the scope of civil discovery available under federal rules, and the strategic implications of Jim Griffin's public statement that none of the six hundred thousand dollars in requested damages would go to Murdaugh personally.He addresses the prosecutorial gap — Hill's guilty pleas to misconduct, obstruction, and perjury alongside the absence of a jury tampering charge from state prosecutors, followed by the Supreme Court's effective finding of exactly that conduct. He evaluates Attorney General Alan Wilson's public consideration of the death penalty for the retrial and the potential legal friction created by vindictive prosecution doctrine.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughTrial #SouthCarolina #JuryTampering #Section1983 #TrueCrime #DeathPenalty #MurdaughRetrial #HiddenKillers
Transcribe →
Why ‘He’s Already in Prison’ Is Not an Answer for the Murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh
May 2200:14:27Tap to summarizePeople are saying it across social media and comment sections: Murdaugh is already locked up, why bother retrying? True Crime Today takes on that argument directly — and explains why the answer is as simple as it is non-negotiable.Maggie Murdaugh was 52. Paul Murdaugh was 22. They were shot to death at close range on their family’s property. The Supreme Court erased the murder convictions and life sentences. The legal record says the question of who killed them is open. That’s not because the evidence was insufficient. It’s because an elected clerk tampered with the jury. The state’s obligation to answer that question didn’t disappear when the verdict was vacated. It was reset.Murdaugh is serving 40 years for financial crimes. That’s punishment for stealing. It is not accountability for two deaths. Calling a financial sentence close enough to a murder conviction tells the families that how Maggie and Paul died doesn’t deserve its own answer. It tells the public that the system has a price ceiling on justice.The constitutional argument is clear. The state brought murder charges. The Supreme Court said the trial was unfair, not that the evidence was inadequate. You don’t charge double murder, get a conviction, lose it to corruption, and then decide the defendant’s other sentence is sufficient. That’s not how the system works and it’s not a precedent any state wants to set.Financial crime victims who were personally harmed by Murdaugh have said publicly they’ll go through the process again. If the people Murdaugh stole from can commit to a retrial, the state of South Carolina can do the same. Maggie and Paul deserve a verdict that holds. A verdict no one can challenge. That’s the only acceptable outcome, and the retrial is the only way to get there.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JusticeForMaggieAndPaul #TrueCrime #SCSupremeCourt #MurderTrial #SouthCarolina #HiddenKillers
Transcribe →
Why Were the Only Convictions Against Word of Faith Members for Unemployment Fraud?
May 2200:17:45Tap to summarizeFor over four decades, former members of the Word of Faith Fellowship have tried to hold the church accountable through every available channel — journalists, law enforcement, social services, federal prosecutors, the courts. According to those who lived it, the system failed at every turn. Jane Whaley’s 2004 assault conviction was overturned after five years of appeals. More than forty former members gave testimony to the SBI in the 1990s. No charges resulted. Inside Edition investigated in 1995. The church survived. DSS opened child abuse investigations. The church sued the department and won. Former members told the AP that the church orchestrated a cover-up strategy in which congregants were pressured into lying to investigators and recanting prior statements. Church leaders and followers reportedly gave at least eighty-five thousand dollars to state politicians, according to WRAL’s analysis. Members volunteered at campaign events for Donald Trump, according to the New York Times. The local Republican Party in Rutherford County was allegedly taken over by people connected to the fellowship. Matthew Fenner’s criminal case stalled for over eight years following a 2017 mistrial. A special prosecutor took over the case in 2026. The only convictions secured: unemployment fraud. Tony Brueski closes a five-part investigation with the systems that were supposed to protect victims — and reportedly failed them for more than forty years.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#WordOfFaith #JaneWhaley #SystemFailed #Cult #TrueCrime #Spindale #PoliticalInfluence #HiddenKillers #MatthewFenner #ReligiousAbuse
Transcribe →
Kouri Richins: What Legal Protections Exist Against A Convicted Murderer's Reach?
May 2200:27:32Tap to summarizeThe prosecution's sentencing memorandum in the Kouri Richins case included pre-sentencing communications in which the defendant stated she intended to "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." The language — "they picked the wrong one" and "they haven't seen anything yet" — preceded a life-without-parole sentence and raises substantive questions about post-conviction conduct from within the Utah correctional system.Eric Faddis examines the legal instruments available to those identified in the defendant's communications: protective orders, no-contact orders, Department of Corrections communication restrictions, and the procedural differences between guardian-directed contact cessation and court-ordered prohibitions.He addresses the legal complexities of third-party proxy contact — a scenario where individuals acting on behalf of a convicted person may not technically be subject to the same restrictions.The defendant faces twenty-six additional pending felony charges in a separate financial crimes prosecution, including mortgage fraud, money laundering, forgery, and communications fraud. Faddis evaluates whether that pending caseload provides any additional legal leverage for those seeking protection. The three minor children are currently in the custody of the victim's sister, with all contact terminated since April 2024.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #TrueCrime #LifeWithoutParole #UtahMurderTrial #ParkCity #WitnessIntimidation #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeToday
Transcribe →Kouri Richins Appeal: Which Legal Issues Survive Appellate Review?
May 2200:15:21Tap to summarizeFollowing her life-without-parole sentence for the aggravated murder of Eric Richins, Kouri Richins' defense team has secured a twenty-eight-day extension to file a motion for a new trial and indicated they intend to retain additional expert consultation.The appellate posture presents several potential issues for review: alleged prosecutorial access to attorney-client privileged communications via monitored jail calls, the timeliness of the Crozier recantation disclosure, the denied change-of-venue motion seeking Salt Lake County jurors, and the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence in a case where the precise mechanism of fentanyl administration was never established by the prosecution.Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor and current defense attorney, evaluates each lane on its appellate merits. He examines the implications of a defense that presented no witnesses and a defendant who did not testify — strategic choices that may limit the scope of appellate arguments available.The jury returned guilty verdicts on all counts, including aggravated murder, attempted aggravated murder, insurance fraud, and forgery, following less than three hours of deliberation. Judge Richard Mrazik characterized the defendant as "simply too dangerous to ever be free." Faddis provides a candid assessment of the realistic probability of appellate relief.Footer Links:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags:#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #TrueCrime #LifeWithoutParole #UtahMurderTrial #ParkCity #AppealDenied #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeToday
Transcribe →