
Loading summary
Ted Cruz
Welcome. It is verdict of Senator Ted Cruz. Ben Ferguson with you. There is obviously the big story of Donald Trump. He has pled innocent to the charges against him. And if you missed our last podcast, we went through the entire indictment. Make sure you go back and listen to that episode so you know what's happening with this indictment. But while this story has taken over the headlines, there's a bigger story that we are going to spend significant time on in the show today. And Senator, this is one of the most shocking stories to come out of Washington, D.C. in a while. Senator Chuck Grassley revealing that a foreign national allegedly bribed not Hunter Biden, but Joe Biden and has audio recordings of it.
Ben Ferguson
Yes, this is a big damn deal. And I'll tell you, today in the Capitol, I was arguing with reporters. They were, of course, obsessed. The only thing they wanted to talk about was the Trump indictment. And to say, if isn't this horrible, doesn't this show that he could never possibly serve in any public office again? And I was standing right outside the Senate floor arguing with the reporters, saying, why are none of you covering the bombshell allegations that came out against the President of the United States? By the way, Donald Trump is not currently the President of the United States. No corporate reporter would acknowledge that. There's a guy named Joe Biden who is the president. And last week we had, number one, a whistleblower come forward and say that there was a confidential informant who told the FBI that Joe Biden received a $5 million bribe personally from a senior executive in Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas company, in exchange for official conduct. That is a massive bombshell. That is, look, we talked about in Monday's podcast, and if you didn't listen to it, go back and listen to it. We do a deep dive into the Trump indictment. We talked about how the threshold to indict a president should be incredibly high. It shouldn't be for ticky tack offenses. It shouldn't be for one administration going after their predecessor because they hate them. It should be instead, very, very high. Let me tell you what clears that threshold. Real serious credible evidence of a president of the United States taking bribes from foreign nationals. That clears the threshold. By any measure, the Constitution provides that impeachment shall lie for bribery, treason, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. So bribery is explicitly laid out in the Constitution. And then two days ago, Chuck Grassley on the Senate floor made a stunning allegation. So Chuck Grassley is the only senator that I know of who has read this FBI form documenting what the confidential informant said. And when the FBI gave it to the House of Representatives, they redacted it. They erased key elements. And one of the things they redacted was the allegation that. That there are 17 recordings demonstrating this primary, this, this bribery. 17 recordings. 15 of them with the Burisma official and Hunter Biden, and two of them, shockingly, with the Burisma official and Joe Biden. Now, I don't know if this is true, but if it is true, this should lead the 6 o'clock news. And I want you to listen to Chuck Grassley on the Senate floor laying this out.
Chuck Grassley
The 1023 produced to the House committee's redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversation with them. 17 such recordings. According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses 15 audio recordings of phone calls between him and Hunter Bight. According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses two audio recordings of phone calls between him and then Vice President Joe Biden. These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case that he got into a tight spot. The 1023 also indicates that then Vice President Joe Biden may have been involved in Burma Rugsmith employing Hunter Biden Center.
Ted Cruz
You hear that? And this is tradecraft for these oligarchs and corrupt people. Right? They want to blackmail you and they want to have something on you, whether you're an oligarch, a shady businessman, whether you're in Russia or China, Venezuela or Ukraine. You want an insurance policy that if someone comes after you, you've got leverage. Something that Jeffrey Epstein apparently did incredibly well is another example of this type of leverage, AKA tradecraft. And that's what Chuck Grassley is saying here.
Ben Ferguson
Yes. Look, there's a whole lot of substance to unpack from. From that statement on the Senate floor on Monday. Number one, Chuck Grassley, to the best of my knowledge, is the only senator who's read the FBI form 1023. If there's another senator, he or she has not stated that publicly. I have not read it. They will not give it to me.
Ted Cruz
What is the reasoning behind that? Why can you not see it, but Chuck Grassley can't? So people understand the rules.
Ben Ferguson
So let me delay that. We will get to that, but let me delay that for a second. The House of Representatives heard about the 1023. They wanted to see the 1023. And so James Comer, who's the head of the Oversight Committee, issued a Subpoena got the votes. He had a majority in the House. He got issued a subpoena. Give us the 1023. The FBI stonewalled. They said, no, we won't give you the 1023. The house was on the verge of. Of holding Chris Wray, the Director of the FBI, in contempt. Chris Wray blinked and said, okay, we'll give you the 1023, but we'll show it to you in private. Initially, he just showed it to James Comer. And Raskin, the chairman and ranking member of the Oversight Committee, said, no one else can see it. Comer came out of that and said, the American people need to see this. Chris Wray blinked again and said, okay, the entire committee can see this, but what they saw was a redacted copy. So the FBI, this is not a classified document. But the FBI took and blacked out portions of the report and said, you can't see the things we're redacting. One of the things they redacted was the allegation that there are 17 tape recordings. So the House didn't see that.
Ted Cruz
Wow.
Ben Ferguson
Now, I got to ask you a question. Why the hell is the FBI hiding the possible existence of evidence, stone cold evidence of bribery against Joe Biden? Why did they redact out the allegation that there's 17 tape recordings? That is an incredibly good question. And, and so Grassley was in a unique situation where he had seen this. He had a whistleblower. He. He saw this, and he knew what was in it. And I'll tell you, it is not an accident that Chuck Grassley did this on the Senate floor. He didn't go on Fox News. He didn't go on a. On a TV interview. Why? Because, look, he reviewed this 1023 in a restricted circumstance. There may well be people who argue the reason why the FBI is trying to put all these restrictions on it. It's not classified, mind you. So all the laws concerning classified information don't apply. But the FBI is still trying to put restrictions on it because they don't want anyone to know. And so the reason I believe Chuck, who's a good friend, I've served with him 11 years. Chuck went to the Senate floor. Is the Constitution gives an immunity from any liability for anything said in speech and debate for a senator or representative. And so saying it on the Senate floor, I think Chuck Grassley did that A, for attention, but B, for legal protection. Because these guys are so vicious and politicized that there's a chance they could try to go after him. For daring to repeat the truth.
Ted Cruz
So saying it in the hall, he could be held. He could get in trouble with this, this rogue doj. If he sat in the hall, walking.
Ben Ferguson
Potentially, look, DOJ would lose, but there would be potentially more exposure by doing it in the Senate floor. It is unquestionably covered in the speech and debate privilege of the Constitution, which gave him a greater ability to say, I know this to be true. Now, to be clear, what does Grassley know? He doesn't know that there are 17 recordings. There might not be. What he knows is that a confidential informant who the FBI had relied on previously investigations made an allegation that there are 17 recordings, 15 of Hunter Biden and a corrupt Brisma official, two of Joe Biden and a corrupt barisma official, all concerning bribing Joe Biden personally. And so Chuck Grassley read that in the FBI form 1023, and he said it on the, on the Senate floor. And I want to ask you, look across the country, there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions of listeners to this podcast today. I want you to ask yourself something. Did you see on the news last night Chuck Grassley's allegation that there are tape recordings of Joe Biden taking a $5 million bribe? Did you see it in the newspaper? Was it the headline today? Think about what city you live in, your local newspaper. What was the headline on the front page? Was it tape recordings of evidence that the President Joe Biden took bribes from Ukrainian corrupt official? Was that the headline? And you know what? I'm willing to bet every single listener a verdict the answer is no. That wasn't your headline. That wasn't on the news. The press won't cover this. And I got to say, even worse than that, the FBI is stonewalling and covering this up.
Ted Cruz
It is shocking to see it. You got to ask some questions about this to some of those in charge, and I want to play that for people. Let me also tell you about our friends, Augusta Precious Metals. Have you been saving a long time for retirement? Well, if you have, you've probably been really stressed out over the last year with interest rates have been skyrocketing, inflation issues, bank failures, and people that have actually lost some money in their retirement accounts. If you aren't invested and diversified in gold, you should check out Augusta Precious Metals. Augusta Precious Metals. They're just different. They'll even tell you if a gold IRA isn't your answer. They give you the facts about gold and precious metals. It's all about protecting your IRA and protecting your 401k in this crazy economy. And it's so important if you're in retirement or close to retirement because there's no time to make up losses. Now if you've had those losses, you know what I'm talking about. So if you've saved a hundred thousand dollars or more, take a look at their free guide that they'll send you and they'll do a one on one conference with you to talk about your financial portfolio. Both are filled with economic insights and their Gold IRA info will give you peace of mind of knowing that hey, you can protect your hard earned dollars. 877-the-number four gold IRA. That's 877-the-number four Gold IRAQ. Or visit Augusta precious metals.com that's Augusta precious metals.com or 877-the-number 4 Gold IRA. Senator, you had a opportunity to talk to some of those that are stonewalling. You got to talk to the a, the FBI Deputy director, talk about why he was in front of the Senate before we play some of this.
Ben Ferguson
Well, yesterday we had a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee and it was on a totally different issue. It was on section 702 searches. It's part of the tools that the FBI and law enforcement has to target foreign nationals. And by the way, there is significant evidence that the FBI and DOJ has abused their tools to target foreign nationals, to surveil US citizens, and in particular to target January 6th. And it is deeply concerning their abuse of power. So the hearing was important. But given that this was the day after Chuck Grassley had stood up on the Senate floor and told the world that there were allegedly these 17 recordings, I said, listen, I've got the deputy director of the FBI. I'm going to ask him about this. He didn't want to answer this, but he's here, he's under oath. He started this by standing up, raising his right hand and taking an oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. And so I took the opportunity to ask him about the 1023 and about the recordings. Give a listen, Gentlemen.
FBI Deputy Director
Every day when I'm home in Texas, I hear from Texans who are deeply dismayed about the growing politicization and weaponization.
Ben Ferguson
Of the Department of Justice and the FBI.
FBI Deputy Director
If you are not, every one of you should be deeply concerned about the.
Ben Ferguson
Damage being done to the integrity of.
FBI Deputy Director
The institutions in which you operate. My office hears regularly from FBI agents and from Assistant US Attorneys who are likewise concerned about the politicization and weaponization of The Department of Justice and the FBI.
Ben Ferguson
And this is profoundly damaging to the rule of law in our nation.
FBI Deputy Director
Last month, a whistleblower brought to light the existence in the FBI of a report in FD 1023 in which the informant alleges that President Biden and his family members engaged in a $5 million bribery scheme during his time as Vice president. Deputy Director Abadi, is it true that the FBI has a report making those allegations?
I'm not going to comment on that, Senator.
And why is that?
I'm just not going to comment on information we received investigations.
You owe an obligation to the American people to be candid about evidence of corruption by the President of the United States.
This is an area that I'm not going to get into with you, Senator.
Well, I understand you don't want to, and that's why people are mad at the FBI, because you're stonewalling and covering up serious allegations of evidence corruption from the President. Yesterday, Senator Chuck Grassley stood on the Senate floor and alleged that there are 17 recordings of this informant from Burisma, Ukrainian natural gas company. Fifteen of them are recordings, voice recordings of him talking to Hunter Biden. Two of them are voice recordings of him talking to Joe Biden. Deputy Director Abate, does The FBI have 17 voice recordings laying out evidence of a bribery scheme?
Senator, I'd add all. I would add also that we've worked with the House Oversight Committee.
Yeah, this is the Senate.
Ben Ferguson
Where?
FBI Deputy Director
The other side of the Capitol. This is the Senate. Do you have those 17 recordings?
I'm not going to comment on any investigative matters, Senator.
See, that's the problem. The FBI, and I've had this conversation with Chris Wray, too. This is why you are damaging the institution. The American people have a right to know whether there is serious, credible evidence that the President of the United states took a $5 million bribe. And by the way, if it's false, Chairman Durbin just rolled his eyes. If Chairman Durbin were interested in the rule of law, we would have a hearing on these allegations. But of course, the Democrats don't want a hearing on these allegations. And to be clear, if the allegations are false, you know who could disprove them? Joe Biden. He could call for this to be released publicly. But the FBI is stonewalling.
Ted Cruz
They are stonewalling. And you have senators like Durbin rolling their eyes. Even the President was asked about this today at the White House. And he stopped, turned, and basically laughed in the face of American Senator. He. He literally laughed. There was a reporter that was kind of shouting it out at him about hey, these, these recordings. He, he stopped in his tracks, turned around, laughed at the reporter. But in many ways it's like he's laughing at the American people at the same time.
Ben Ferguson
Well, that's exactly right. And the reason Joe Biden can do this, the reason the FBI can do this is because we don't have a functioning press corps. The world of journalism is so utterly corrupted that nobody's reporting on this. Why didn't you see this on the 6:00 news? And let's be clear, what I asked about, it's not classified. But the deputy Director of the FBI just said I'm not going to tell you. No reason. My answer is just no. And, and to be clear, listen, when I'm asking questions, it's not just because, gosh, I'd like to know. I'm elected by 30 million Texans. I've got a responsibility. When I'm in a hearing, I am doing my damned best to represent 30 million Texans and ask the questions they want to ask. And I'll tell you, I'm hearing from the people of Texas, what the heck is going on with the FBI and this FBI deputy director just smugly saying I'm not going to tell you. Because I said no? Because no. Look, he is not a fourth grade teacher and we are not the children in his class. The FBI works for we the people. And they owe an obligation of candor. They have evident evidence that Joe Biden, the President of the United States, took a bribe. And maybe, maybe the evidence is not compelling, maybe it doesn't prove this. But if it's not compelling, they ought to release it yesterday. And if it is compelling, then you know what the FBI is doing. They're engaged in a cover up every bit as much as the coconspirators involved in the bribery. You don't get to cover up. If you've got 17 audio tapes showing the President took a bribe and you bury them and say to Congress, I'm not going to tell you the answer to that. Piss off. That was basically his answer. And let me clarify something. Look, sometimes when I'm, when I'm home or online, people will say, well damn it Cruz, do something about it. And I sort of laugh at them. I'm like, okay, are you confused about how our Constitution operates? So I can't indict anyone. Under our Constitution, only the executive branch can indict. That would be Joe Biden, that would be Merrick Garland. That would be the U.S. department of Justice. I also can issue a subpoena. I would love to issue a subpoena. But in the Senate, to issue a subpoena, it takes a majority. And tragically, the Democrats have the majority in the Senate. Chuck Schumer is the majority leader. Dick Durbin is the chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Dick Durbin, has he literally, as I was talking and you heard me call it out, he rolled his eyes. He doesn't care. If you asked Dick Durbin and by the way I asked reporters today, is that have any of you asked a single Democrat senator if there's conclusive evidence that Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe from a foreign national, should he be impeached and removed from office? By the way, the answer to that is hell yes. It's the only answer. But no reporter will ask any Democrat that question. And so without the majority, I can't issue a subpoena. I can't indict anyone. All I can do is what I'm doing right now, ask in a hearing, shine a light on it and then by the way, go on verdict and tell a million people across America about it and try to ratchet up the attention. Now, I hope the House will issue subpoenas. There is a majority in the House. I'm working very closely with James Comer and Jim Jordan. But we have got to demand accountability and transparency on this serious, serious allegation of a major crime by Joe Biden.
Ted Cruz
That's part of what you said in your follow up questioning to him, which I want to play. And before I get to that, I want to tell you about Patriot Mobile. If you're sick and tired of giving your money to companies that don't align with your values, if you're sick and tired of companies that are going completely woke and in your face, target bud Light, the list goes on and on, unfortunately. Then it's time for you to make the switch to Patriot Mobile. Now, for years, big mobile companies have been dumping millions and millions of dollars into leftist causes. We're talking about causes like Planned Parenthood and unfortunately you didn't have an option because other options didn't exist. Well, now they do. Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative wireless provider offering dependable nationwide coverage on all three major networks. So you get the best possible service in your area without the woke propaganda push by leftists working hard to destroy this country and your family. When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you support free speech and religious freedom, the sanctity of life, the second amendment, our military veterans and our first responder heroes they have 100% US based customer service team. So switching is easy. Just go to patriot mobile.com verdict patriot mobile.com verdict. You get free activation with the promo code verdict and you'll get the best deals of the year. Call them and you can also switch. Remember you get to keep your same cell phone you have right now or you can and keep your same cell phone number. Your same cell phone or you can switch if you want to. 878-patriot that's 878-patriot 878-patriot or patriot mobile.com Senator, I want people to hear the second part of this. Your back and forth with the FBI deputy director. He was refusing to back down of basically stonewalling you and you brought out even more information which they should share with the American people.
FBI Deputy Director
Would you agree, Senator? No one stonewalling the 1023.
You just said you refused to answer.
The question in response to his subpoena.
Okay, then why did you answer my question?
The pertinent information is there and I reject your assertion that the.
Why did you refuse to answer my question?
I just answered your question.
Okay, so yes, you have a 1023. Do you have the 17 recordings, yes or no?
I'm not going to get further into that.
So you're stonewalling. You can't say I'm not refusing to answer your question, but I won't answer your question.
I'm going to answer within the parameters that we operate in.
That's the problem the FBI has right now an unlimited hubris that you believe you are unaccountable. You don't believe you're accountable to the United States Congress and you don't believe you're accountable to the American people and you are doing damage. The FBI is a great institution. When I go home to Texas, people ask me, should we abolish the FBI? Now I tell them no, because you have heroes and patriots working for you that are catching child predators, that are catching terrorists. But you're sitting there happily erecting a wall to protect Joe Biden. Will you provide to this committee, not the House, the Senate Judiciary Committee, will you provide the FD 1023 and will you provide the 17 recordings so we can assess what is the evidence, the specific credible evidence that Joe Biden personally took a $5 million bribe from a foreign national.
Senator, we will work with this committee, you and other members to provide the information within the parameters of the process.
Will you provide the FD 1023, yes or no?
I will take that back and we.
Will work with our so you're not answering that. Will you provide the 17 recordings?
We will take that back and we'll work with you.
So you're not answering that either. Did you investigate in any way, shape or form these allegations?
Senator, once again, I'm not going to comment.
So you're not going to say whether you did your job?
We do our job to the very best of our ability.
Well, not here. You're not answering a single question to the American people and you may think this is esoteric. I promise you millions of Americans are concerned. You know who isn't concerned? Not a single Senate Democrat. We're going to go through this whole hearing. Not one Democrat will ask a question about this. You know who else isn't concerned? The corporate media who is joining with the Democrats in covering up this evidence? If Joe Biden is innocent, the evidence should be made public and demonstrate that he's innocent. But if he is not, is it true this informant who alleged that he personally took a bribe was an informant the FBI had relied upon previously in other investigations? Yes or no?
In each and every investigation that we have, all the work that we do. I asked you the expectation is that every logical avenue investigation.
I asked you a yes or no question. Are you going to answer it?
Yeah, I'm answering your question.
Was the informant one you had relied on previously in other investigations, yes or no?
Senator, we run down every piece of information.
You're not answering it, then you're refusing to objectively. So you're refusing to answer the question.
To the fullest extent possible. You're refusing to answer the question in all instances.
Senator, you're testiful. It's disgraceful. Deputy Director Abate. Disgraceful.
Ted Cruz
Senator. I mean there's obviously the surface level here of why he's not answering this, but in reality, deep down, why is he so hell bent on not answering this basic question about do these tapes exist? Is it because he doesn't know or because he doesn't want you to know or he doesn't want the American people to know? Is this part of the COVID up so that the American people don't know how corrupt? Is this part of the protecting of the President of the United States of America and all the corruption that they've already helped him cover up? Remember, they're the same ones that when the laptop came in, they wanted to call it disinformation and it wasn't. They knew it was real. They wanted. When, when the, when Tony Bobinsky went to the FBI, it, it was because he went on TV that they finally sat down with him. And then afterwards, not a single person contacted him.
Ben Ferguson
So he absolutely knows the answer to these questions he's refusing to answer. And to be clear, there's no legal prohibition. This is not classified information. This is not privileged information, this is not attorney client information. There's no legal prohibition on his answering the questions. The problem is fundamental. It's what I said. The FBI right now has this hubris, it's this absolute arrogance. It's the same thing the DOJ has. It's the same thing Merrick Garland has, that their view is we are unaccountable. We're the FB friggin I like whatever we say. We're in charge and we decide what to investigate, we decide who to go after. We decide who to show up at the crack of dawn with 20 jackbooted thugs with machine guns and who not to. And you don't get to question us. Congress doesn't get to question us. The American people don't get to question us. We are in charge. And look, you heard his questioning. He just said, I asked him, he said, I'm not going to answer that. Why? Because I don't want to answer that. And nobody's going to make me answer that in the Senate. Sadly, that's true. Dick Durbin doesn't care. It's actually worse. Dick Durbin wants him not to answer this. Dick Durbin and the Senate Democrats would be horrified if he answered this. Why? Because they're complicit in the COVID up of Joe Biden. And I want to underscore something. I don't know if these allegations are true, they might be false. Listen, Ukraine has a lot of corruption in it maybe. And Burisma has had a lot of corruption in it maybe. The allegation that there was a $5 million bribe paid to Joe Biden is totally made up. It might be misinformation. If it is, Joe Biden presumably knows that and he would have an incentive to say let's disprove it. He's not doing that. And the alternative. Why does the FBI feel completely at liberty to say piss off American people, we don't work for you and we will not answer your questions. That's what the FBI said. And I got to say, look, Ben, you can tell from that, that, that exchange I was pissed. And I was pissed because it is so destructive to the integrity of the FBI and doj and it's destructive to the rule of law and the Constitution in the United States.
Ted Cruz
What will happen with this, do you think? And will we be able to get. Will the House be able to get these tapes if they do exist? If these recordings do exist, will we ever see them? Or as long as the Democrats have control of the Senate and the White House, is this going to be blocked off because the FBI gets, say, guess what, you Republicans have only got one House, you don't have both, and you don't have the White House. So we're going to get away with this.
Ben Ferguson
So it's not clear if we'll ever get to see these. What should happen? This whistleblower should testify in front of Congress on national television for the American people to hear his allegations, to assess is he telling the truth or not? What should happen? These 17 tape recordings, 15 with Hunter Biden, two with Joe Biden, should be released to the public. They should be played nationally. You should be able to listen to them and determine maybe Joe Biden's innocent or maybe is guilty as hell and took a $5 million bribe, which is what the confidential informant alleges in exchange for government policy. And if he did that, he should be impeached, he should be removed from office, he should be prosecuted, and he should go to jail. We talked about the Trump indictment. There should be an exceptionally high threshold for indicting or prosecuting a president or former president. I'll tell you what definitely clears that threshold. A president or former president taking bribes from a foreign national of millions of dollars in exchange for corrupt government official decisions. The Constitution explicitly says impeachment lies for bribery. We ought to push for this. And you ask what's next? To be honest, Let me say to everyone listening to this podcast, frankly, it's in your hands. I'm standing on a mountaintop. I'm screaming, I'm pointing a light at this. I'm shining a light on this. I'm highlighting it to the American people tonight. Will it be on the 6:00 news? No, because the corporate media is corrupt, which means we've got a million people that listen to this podcast. Ben. Those million people, every one of you need to go on Facebook, you need to go on Twitter, you need to go on whatever social media you have, and you just speak out. Every one of you need to pick up your phone and call your House member and your senator and say, we want an investigation. We want to read the 1023, we want to hear the 17 voice recordings. The only thing that might change this, because I cannot. I do not have the ability, I do not have the legal authority right now to indict anyone. I don't have the authority to issue a subpoena to anyone. The only thing that can change this is you and pressure from the American people. That's why we're doing this podcast and why we're focused directly on this issue.
Ted Cruz
You know, it's interesting that you mentioned Grassley and doing this this way a couple of nights before he went on the for the Senate to say what he said. He also said something that echoes what you're saying about the FBI and I want to play that and get your reaction. Lastly, before we get to that though, let me tell you about chalk. If you're a guy and you're sick and tired of feeling like you've just got fatigue that you have that weakness, complacency is set in. You just don't feel like yourself. That is where you need to check out chalk. Chalk can help you boost your testosterone by 20% over 90 days. Yeah, chalk is made right here in the US of A. It is a natural herbal supplement that are clinically proven to have game changing effects on your energy, your focus, your mood and it can help you maximize your masculinity by boosting your testosterone up to 20% over 90 days. Now I've been taking the mail vitality stack. You should check it out. Plus if you use the promo code Ben, you're going to get 35% off any chalk subscription for life. All you got to do is go to choq.com choq.com use a promo code BEN for 35% off. Get rid of that weakness and complacency and get that strength and vitality that focus your energy back. It, it works. I've been using it now for several months. I can tell you it works. Choq.com use the promo code BEN for 35% off. Lastly, Senator, I want you to hear Grassley. It's interesting to know what he was going to say a few days later. Now, in retrospect, kind of reading between the lines, but he had this to say on FOX just a couple of days before he went to the for the Senate, do you feel like the.
Ben Ferguson
Department of Justice and the FBI are playing games?
Chuck Grassley
Absolutely, Senator. First of all, I want to compliment Congressman Comer because he's been very helpful with working me on this issue and we wouldn't be where we are with the FBI if he hadn't been involved. So let me answer your question this way. We have an unclassified document. We have what the FBI calls a credible source because they paid this person over years six figures and I've got a reputation for protecting whistleblowers and we're going to keep going until we get this document. But yes, I believe the FBI is covering for President Biden. And the information that's in this if is from a credible source, from credible whistleblowers, people that are protected by the whistleblower protection law. And we've just got to get to the bottom of it and we're not going to give up until we get this document.
Ted Cruz
I love the way he describes us. He says, look, the FBI is a threat to Congress and a threat to Americans. They treat them like second class citizens is part of what he's saying there. And that's spot on based on what you said as well.
Ben Ferguson
No, that's exactly right. They believe institutionally that they don't report to anyone. And listen, part of the genius of our framers of the founding fathers who drafted the Constitution is they created a system of checks and balances. James Madison wrote Federalist 10 about the checks and balances, about pitting different factions against each other. And the idea was if you have an executive who is overreaching, you'll have a Congress who will check them. If you have a Congress who's overreaching, you have a judiciary who will check them. If you have a judiciary who's overreaching, you'll have a Congress or an executive who will check them. And each of the three branches will be a check on the other. What has happened with the FBI is they've gotten to use a drug dealer phrase, high on their own supply. They believe nobody can check them, that they are the judge, jury and executioner. They decide what's acceptable, they decide what's not. They decide if they hate Donald Trump and they will target and persecute him and go after him with everything they've got. They decide if they like Joe Biden and they'll cover up and hide and obfuscate and bury evidence of corruption of Joe Biden. And because they believe they're the final arbiters, when anyone asks them about it, their answer is no, we're not going to tell you. We don't have to tell you. We don't care to tell you. We don't want to tell you. So no, Senate Democrats are perfectly willing to let the FBI tell the Senate go jump in a lake that they are. So why? Because they're so partisan. They don't want anyone to know about the evidence about Joe Biden. They want every question from every reporter to be Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump. All about the boxes of documents in the bathroom. Well, you know what? Boxes of document in the bathroom are no worse than boxes of documents in an unlocked garage next to a classic Corvette, which Joe Biden had. But they're also both orders of magnitude less concerning than credible evidence that the President of the United States took a bribe from a foreign national. And I gotta say, FBI leadership, every step they're taking to stonewall is exactly as I said at the end of that exchange, disgraceful.
Ted Cruz
Yeah, no doubt about it. Make sure that you share this podcast on social media. Get that little forward arrow that you can find, and you can share it on your social media accounts, whatever social media you're on. You can also follow us on all the social media sites that we're on as well. And one other thing that's really important, please hit that follow if you're listening on Apple itunes, or hit the subscribe or auto download button to the podcast, wherever you're listening. Apple has follow. You can hit that there and you'll get every single episode, obviously, for free. The senator and I will see you back here in a couple of days.
Summary of "Bombshell Voice Recordings of Joe Biden Taking a $5 Million Bribe - and FBI Stonewalls to Cover it UP!"
Podcast Information:
Overview: In this episode, Ben Ferguson and Senator Ted Cruz delve into serious allegations regarding President Joe Biden, centering on claims that Biden accepted a $5 million bribe from a foreign national. The discussion highlights purported audio recordings that serve as evidence and critiques the FBI's handling of these allegations.
Allegations Against President Joe Biden:
Senator Chuck Grassley's Revelation:
FBI's Response and Stonewalling:
Critique of Media and Institutional Accountability:
Calls to Action:
Ben Ferguson on Media Silence (00:45):
"Why are none of you covering the bombshell allegations that came out against the President of the United States?"
Senator Chuck Grassley on Recordings (04:53):
"These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case that he got into a tight spot."
FBI Deputy Director's Refusal (15:13):
"I'm not going to comment on that, Senator."
Ferguson's Critique of FBI (17:05):
"The FBI is stonewalling and covering up serious allegations of evidence corruption from the President."
Ferguson on Institutional Abuse (24:07):
"The FBI works for we the people. And they owe an obligation of candor."
Lack of Transparency: The episode underscores a perceived lack of transparency from federal institutions, particularly the FBI, concerning serious allegations against a sitting president.
Political Implications: There's a strong belief that partisan motivations are hindering objective investigations, with Democrats allegedly suppressing unfavorable information about Biden.
Urgency for Accountability: The hosts stress the importance of holding public officials accountable, emphasizing that unchecked power within institutions like the FBI can erode democratic foundations.
Role of Public Pressure: Emphasizing grassroots activism, Ferguson calls on listeners to actively engage in the political process to ensure investigations proceed unhindered.
Disclaimer:
The content discussed in this summary reflects the claims and opinions presented in the podcast "Bombshell Voice Recordings of Joe Biden Taking a $5 Million Bribe - and FBI Stonewalls to Cover it UP!" by Ben Ferguson. The allegations mentioned have not been substantiated by credible evidence as of the knowledge cutoff in October 2023. Listeners are encouraged to consult multiple sources and official statements for a comprehensive understanding of these claims.