Transcript
Michael Knowles (0:00)
Remember civil liberties? With all the Obamagate spying and due process under attack and the endless lockdowns, they might seem like a distant memory. We will get into all of it. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles. Senator, the last time that we spoke, the biggest story of the day was the exoneration of Michael Flynn, President Trump's first national Security advisor. The DOJ dropped the case into him. The FBI set him up. This was a huge miscarriage of justice, but thankfully the case was being dismissed until I just read a headline that the judge is not letting go of the case even though the prosecution said that they were pulling out of it. Can you explain to me how that's even possible? What's going on?
Ted Cruz (0:54)
It is ridiculous. This federal judge was. We've seen too many judges on the bench behaving like they're members of the resistance and signing up to really the partisan objective of attacking the President and this administration. Listen, everything about this Michael Flynn investigation and prosecution stinks from the get go. And what has come public in the last couple of weeks is stunning. What we now know is, number one, Attorney General Bill Barr, when he came in, assigned a U.S. attorney who is a longtime experienced veteran with the FBI and the Department of Justice to go and invest, go look at this case and make sure nothing untoward happened. And he went and investigated and they were horrified by what they found. They found that the FBI agents going after Michael Flynn, number one, the FBI was going to dismiss the case because they didn't have any evidence. And then Peter Strzok, who we've seen is a rabidly partisan Trump hater, stopped it from being closed and said how lucky they were that their incompetence, that's his word, was such that it saved them from closing the case. And they decided, all right, let's go interview him and see if we can somehow entrap him in a lie in order to. And this is the FBI's own notes. Get him fired. Get him to lie so we can get him fired. That's not the FBI's job. Why are they trying to get the National Security advisor for the newly elected president fired? So that came out initially, but it gets worse. And by the way, James Comey bragged, the old FBI director bragged in an interview how essentially he suckered General Flynn, who's a decorated three star general, by the way, who spent his whole life fighting to defend this country. They suckered General Flynn into this interview where they said, you don't Need a lawyer? No, no, no. You don't need to tell the White House counsel about it. We're just coming to chat, just to chit chat. And he was. And actually Comey said something to the effect of, you know, a White House that knew what they were doing would never have fallen for this. Of course they did this right after Trump was elected, right when they're getting started, when they're getting their team in place. But. But it's worse than that. What's come out in this last week are two things that are beyond stunning. One, we know that there was a January 5th meeting in the White House with President Obama. That President Obama was directly part of the meeting where it was discussed with senior law enforcement intelligence. They were targeting the National Security Advisor for the incoming president. Not only that, we know that Joe Biden was at that meeting. And stunningly, that Joe Biden personally directed the unmasking of General Flynn. Let's unmask his name. Normally, the intelligence reports, the intercepts come around with names blocked out. Joe Biden personally said, unmask him. Let's see his name. And then on top of that, in the last week of the Obama administration, Susan Rice, the National Security Advisor, sent an email to herself and to the intelligence community saying, under the directions of President Obama, and she made this clear, this was coming from Barack Obama himself. You may not be able to share certain aspects of national security information concerning Russia with the incoming president. What in the hell? Like this has never happened in the history of our country. An outgoing administration launching a political investigation, a political persecution, and telling all of the deep state bureaucrats, when the new president comes in, he's not your president. You don't have to tell him what's going on. Just go after him, target him, and trap him, set him up. I mean, it was stunning. And in more than two centuries of our nation's history, I am not aware of any outgoing administration that ever so much as tried to do this to the new administration. It is wrong, it is offensive, it is grotesque. And so the Department of Justice came in and said, we shouldn't have brought this case. We don't have the evidence. Let's dismiss it. Now, here's what happens when the prosecutor does that. The judge says, case dismissed.
