FAA in Technology Crisis, Drug Price Shakedown & Can One Judge take the Power of POTUS

Summary

The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

Episode: FAA in Technology Crisis, Drug Price Shakedown & Can One Judge Take the Power of POTUS
Release Date: May 17, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of The 47 Morning Update, host Ben Ferguson delves into three pressing issues shaping America today: the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) technological shortcomings, the administration's groundbreaking measures to reduce prescription drug prices, and a critical examination of judicial overreach threatening presidential authority. Through insightful discussions and expert interviews, Ferguson provides listeners with a comprehensive overview of these significant topics.

---

1. FAA's Technological Crisis

Overview:
Ben Ferguson opens the discussion with a startling revelation about the FAA's reliance on outdated technology. The agency's inefficiencies have reached a point where replacement parts are being sourced from unconventional platforms like eBay, highlighting the urgent need for modernization.

Key Points:

• Outdated Systems:
  The FAA's current infrastructure is so obsolete that essential parts are no longer manufactured, forcing the agency to purchase replacements from non-traditional sources.

• Administration's Response:
  Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has publicly acknowledged the crisis and outlined a plan for a comprehensive overhaul of the FAA's systems. This initiative aims to enhance safety and reliability but is expected to span several years.

• Implications for Air Traffic Control:
  The technological deficiencies have directly impacted air traffic control operations, leading to increased stress among air traffic controllers and contributing to operational delays and cancellations.

Notable Quotes:

• Sean Duffy [05:22]:
  “Our main mission is safety. And so if there's any concern with safety, we slow down traffic and there might be delays, there might be cancellations...”

• Ben Ferguson [07:13]:
  “Thank goodness the Trump administration is willing to take on a problem that every other administration just wanted to kick the can down the road.”

Discussion:
Ferguson and guest Bob Pittman critically assess the FAA's predicament, emphasizing the administration's commitment to rectifying long-standing issues that have been neglected by previous administrations. The conversation underscores the importance of investing in modern technology to ensure the safety and efficiency of America's aviation infrastructure.

---

2. Prescription Drug Price Shakedown

Overview:
The episode transitions to a significant policy shift aimed at making prescription drugs more affordable for Americans. President Donald Trump's administration has introduced measures to implement "most favored nation" pricing, ensuring that the U.S. pays prices comparable to those in other wealthy nations.

Key Points:

• Most Favored Nation Pricing:
  The administration will negotiate with pharmaceutical companies to match the lowest drug prices available globally, significantly reducing the cost burden on American consumers.

• Direct Purchasing Mechanism:
  A new system will allow American patients to buy drugs directly from manufacturers at these negotiated prices, eliminating middlemen and further driving down costs.

• Impact on Healthcare:
  The policy promises substantial savings for patients, with examples highlighting drastic reductions in prices for critical medications.

Notable Quotes:

• President Trump via Bob Pittman [08:29]:
  “We are going to pay the lowest price that there is in the world. So we're no longer paying 10 times more than another country.”

• Señor Duffy [12:02]:
  “…we're going to be able to get the pharmaceutical industry whole. Those jobs will still be here, will still be productive.”

Impactful Examples:

• A breast cancer drug costing over $16,000 per bottle in the U.S. is available for one-sixth that price in Australia and one-tenth in Sweden.
• An asthma medication priced at nearly $500 in America is available for less than $40 in the United Kingdom.

Analysis:
Ferguson highlights the disproportionate contribution of the U.S. to global pharmaceutical profits relative to its population size. He criticizes previous administrations for allowing pharmaceutical companies to exploit this imbalance, resulting in exorbitant drug prices for American consumers. The new policies are portrayed as a monumental step towards economic fairness and healthcare accessibility.

---

3. Judicial Overreach and the Power of POTUS

Overview:
In the final segment, Ferguson is joined by J.B. McCuskey, the Attorney General of West Virginia and a former roommate, to discuss concerns about judicial overreach. The conversation centers on the increasing tendency of district court judges to issue nationwide injunctions that could undermine presidential authority.

Key Points:

• Nationwide Injunctions:
  McCuskey explains how a single district court judge's decisions are being extended to affect the entire country, bypassing the established judicial processes.

• Constitutional Implications:
  The use of nationwide injunctions by district courts is argued to be unconstitutional, as it allows unelected judges to make sweeping decisions without proper legislative or judicial oversight.

• Amicus Brief Submission:
  West Virginia, along with the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), has submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, advocating for the preservation of the separation of powers and the correct jurisdictional authority of courts.

Notable Quotes:

• J.B. McCuskey [14:52]:
  “District court judges are supposed to hear cases that are in front of them and make decisions for the plaintiffs that are in front of them here.”

• Ben Ferguson [20:50]:
  “The confidence that the public has in the independence of our judiciary will go down very quickly.”

Discussion:
The dialogue between Ferguson and McCuskey scrutinizes the manipulation of the judiciary by certain interest groups to enact broad policy changes without due process. They emphasize the importance of maintaining the constitutional balance of power, ensuring that decisions affecting the entire nation undergo appropriate scrutiny and collective judicial consensus.

Additional Insights:

• Rule 23 Class Actions:
  McCuskey advocates for the use of Rule 23 to create class actions, thereby allowing courts to handle disputes involving large groups of plaintiffs in a structured and transparent manner.

• Public Confidence in the Judiciary:
  The potential erosion of trust in the judicial system is a significant concern, as it undermines the foundational principles of impartiality and independence that are crucial for a fair legal system.

---

Conclusion

Ben Ferguson's episode of The 47 Morning Update offers a thorough examination of critical issues affecting American infrastructure, healthcare affordability, and the integrity of the judicial system. Through detailed reporting and expert interviews, Ferguson underscores the administration's efforts to address systemic problems and safeguard constitutional principles. This episode serves as an essential resource for listeners seeking to understand the complexities and implications of these pivotal developments.

---

Subscribe to The 47 Morning Update on the iHeartRadio app or your preferred podcast platform to stay informed on the latest news and insightful commentary.

Transcript

[Ryan Seacrest]

You're listening to an iHeart podcast.

[Ben Ferguson]

The international Fellowship of Christians and Jews has supported and will continue to support the people of Israel with life saving security essentials. And your gift today will help save lives by providing bomb shelters, armored security vehicles, ambulances, firefighting equipment, flag jackets and bulletproof vests, and so much more. Give a gift to bless Israel and her people by by visiting right now. IFCJ.org that's IFCJ.org it is Ryan Seacrest here.

[Ryan Seacrest]

There was a recent social media trend which consisted of flying on a plane with no music, no movies, no entertainment. But a better trend would be going to chumbacasino.com it's like having a mini social casino in your pocket. Chumba casino has over 100 online casino style games, all absolutely free. It's the most fun you can have online and on a plane. So grab your free welcome bonus [e-mail] sponsored by Chumba Casino.

[J.B. McCuskey]

No purchase necessary. VGW Group void where prohibited by law. 21 plus terms and conditions apply. Wasn't that delicious?

[Ben Ferguson]

So good.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Your bill, ladies.

[Ben Ferguson]

I got it.

[J.B. McCuskey]

No, I got it.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Seriously, I insist. I insisted first. Don't be silly. You don't be silly.

[J.B. McCuskey]

You don't be silly.

[Ben Ferguson]

People with the Wells Fargo Active Cash credit card prefer to pay because they earn unlimited 2% cash back on purchases.

[J.B. McCuskey]

Okay.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Rock, paper, scissors for it. Rock, paper, scissors. Shoot.

[Ben Ferguson]

No.

[Ryan Seacrest]

The Wells Fargo Active Cash credit card. Visit Wells Fargo.com ActiveCash terms apply. This podcast is supported by Talkspace. When my husband came home from his military deployment, readjusting was hard for all of us. Thankfully, I found Talkspace. Talkspace provides professional support from licensed therapists and psychiatric providers online. Military members, veterans and their dependents ages 13 and older can get fast access to providers, all from the privacy of their computers or smartphones. I just answered a few questions online and Talkspace matched me with a therapist. We meet when it's convenient for me and I can message her anytime. It was so easy to set up and they accept Tricare. Therapy was going so well, my husband and I started seeing a couples therapist through Talkspace too. Talkspace works with most major insurers, including Tricare. Match with a licensed therapist [e-mail] military go to talkspace.com military to get started today. That's talkspace.com military hi, I'm Bob Pittman, chairman and CEO of iHeartMedia. On this week's episode of Math and Magic, I'm sitting down with the one and only Bobby Bones. We're exploring the power of audio.

[Ben Ferguson]

Yeah, I don't fit into one specific hole. I think that is what endeared me to listeners. That's why I'm here now, because I talk to people that grew up like me, have sensibilities like me and have loyalties like me.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Listen to math and magic stories from the frontiers of Marketing on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast or wherever you get your podcast.

[Bob Pittman]

If you take a look at the pharmaceutical and drug cuts, they're so massive that I think a lot of Democrats have to vote for the bill, number one. Number two, even if I didn't do this today, even if there was no such thing as these, you know, 50 to 90% cuts, I mean, think of it where we're buying, selling drugs in other countries for five times more than it costs in the United States. How horrible that is. Anyway, but that's going to be a thing of the past.

[Ryan Seacrest]

You're listening to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson.

[Ben Ferguson]

Good Saturday morning to you. Ben Ferguson with you. And these are some of the stories that you may have missed that we talked about this week on the 47 Morning Update. First up, in a shocking report, we're finding out just how bad things are at the faa, including the fact that the equipment is so antiqu that they're having to buy replacement parts on ebay. Donald Trump pledging he's going to fix and overhaul the entire system. Up next, a massive deal on prescription drug prices. And finally, I will be joined by a good friend of mine, a former roommate who's now the West Virginia attorney general, who is standing up to make sure that these activist judges in these district courts are not actually making rulings that would take away the power of the presidency. It's the 47 Morning Update and it starts right now.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Story number one.

[Ben Ferguson]

In a shocking revelation, we now have found out that the faa, the Federal Aviation Administration, is relying on such outdated technology that the transportation secretary, Sean Duffy, has disclosed that the agency is forced to purchase replacement parts on platforms like ebay due to how obsolete their current systems are. The administration is now promising that there will be a massive overhaul of the system, but it could take years to accomplish. Sean Duffy doing a sit down interview with CBS THIS MORNING explaining just how bad the system is and why. Donald Trump has told him it's time to overhaul it as fast as we can.

[Sean Duffy]

Our main mission is safety. And so if there's any concern with safety, we slow down traffic and there might be delays, there might be cancellations, and we take Those precautions to make sure that you get from your departure city to your, to your arrival city. But it's going to take a little bit of time. Now, the main line that feeds information into Newark, that went down, the secondary line didn't stand up. And so both lines are now working. We have a little bit of issues with our air traffic controllers. Some of them have stepped out of the tower. They were, they were stressed. So we're training new individuals in the Philly tracon, which services Newark, and we're building a whole new fiber driven system down in Philly that does serve that Newark TRACON or the Newark airport. So listen, we're in a situation where, you know, it's going to take us a little bit of time. I hope by the summer we're going to be fully functioning.

[Bob Pittman]

Yeah, I was going to say, Mr.

[Ben Ferguson]

Duffy, what does that mean when you.

[Bob Pittman]

Say a little bit of time? You say by the summer?

[Ben Ferguson]

Because I'm thinking the problem with Newark.

[Bob Pittman]

Is when you hear the screens went down and no one seemed to be.

[Ben Ferguson]

Able to explain that, you don't think.

[Bob Pittman]

We have to worry about that happening again? You think they've corrected that problem?

[Sean Duffy]

Well, in Newark, both lines are working. And so, you know, listen. Yes, and if both lines do go down, there are emergency procedures, backup procedures that we take to talk to airplanes to make sure they stay separated. But Gail, I'm concerned. I mean, this, this system that we use, many, much of the equipment you have to buy on ebay, no one makes it anymore. That's how old the system is that we fly on today. Which is why yesterday I called for a brand new infrastructure plant to rebuild everything across the spectrum for air traffic control. It is well overdue in America. And I think what you've seen in Newark is you're having failings. And when you have the failings, you take a look at the whole system and could other parts, you know, have issues? Of course it could have issues, but that's why it's a call to action to do this for America so you always feel safe when you're flying.

[Ben Ferguson]

Gail, thank goodness the Trump administration is willing to take on a problem that every other administration just wanted to kick the can down the road and we'll finally be able to know that we have a system that's reliable and safe and parts are no longer being bought on ebay. Next story number two, major victory number one for the American people is going to have a massive impact on so many Americans that deal with high costs of prescription drugs. Here is what you need to know about what the president has done to lower the price of prescription drugs for all Americans. The announcement and the action put forth saying American patients will be first instead of the pharmaceutical companies by Donald Trump will have an impact for every American. Now, this should not be a conservative or liberal or Republican or Democratic issue, yet Democrats are angry about it. So let me tell you exactly how this is going to have an impact on you. First up, the president said that we are now going to have most favored nation prescription drug pricing, saying we are going to pay the lowest price that there is in the world. Here's the president in his own words.

[Bob Pittman]

But it's called most favored nation. We are going to pay the lowest price there is in the world. We will get whoever is paying the lowest price. That's the price that we're going to get. So remember that. So we're no longer paying 10 times more than another country. Whoever is paying the lowest price, we will look at that price and we will say that's the price we're going to pay. Most favored nations. That's what it is. One breast cancer drug costs Americans over $16,000 per bottle. But the same drug from the same factory, manufactured by the same company, is one sixth that price in Australia and one tenth that price in Sweden. 1/10 for the identical product. A common asthma drug costs almost $500 here in America, but costs less than $40 in the United Kingdom. So $40 in the United Kingdom, which is where this gentleman told me he paid a small amount for his his shot. But think of that. So $40 versus $500 here, 40 compared.

[Ben Ferguson]

To $500, the difference between the UK and the US now, let me explain more about this order. The order directs the U.S. trade Representative and the Secretary of Commerce to take action to ensure foreign countries are not engaged in practices that purposefully and unfairly undercut market prices and drive price hikes in the United States. All what I'm giving you right now is coming directly from the White House. I want very clear. Number two, the order instructs the administration to communicate price targets to pharmaceutical manufacturers to establish that America, the largest purchaser and funder of prescription drugs in the world, gets the best price. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is going to establish a mechanism through which American patients can buy their drugs directly from manufacturers who sell to Americans at a, quote, most favored nation price, bypassing the middlemen. And finally, from the White House, if drug manufacturers fail to offer most favored nation pricing, the order directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to one, propose rules and impose most favored nation pricing and two, take other aggressive measures to significantly reduce the cost of prescription drugs, the American consumer and most importantly, end anti competitive practices. Why? Because the White House says it's about getting a better deal for Americans. And President Trump once again taking action to keep pharmaceutical manufacturers from charging Americans high drug prices while giving steep discounts to other wealthy nations. That is something that Dr. Oz talked about the White House, with the President by his side, and here is what he said. That means that we are paying in.

[Bob Pittman]

America four times more than that drug costs in other countries. Again, 100% is the baseline.

[Ben Ferguson]

It's 289% above that baseline.

[Bob Pittman]

It goes all the way down to where we're paying 50% more than any other country.

[Ben Ferguson]

That's the range.

[Bob Pittman]

As was pointed out by President Trump, half the time we're paying three times more than is paid in other countries. It doesn't make any sense for the system. That stated President Trump has over and over again indicated, and Secretary Kennedy reflected as well, we want innovation, we want.

[Ben Ferguson]

Our technology partners doing the best they.

[Bob Pittman]

Can to make the best solutions for drugs to cure as many people in America and around the world as possible. By getting our allies to pay a.

[Ben Ferguson]

Bit more, as they should be and.

[Bob Pittman]

They should have for many years been doing, we'll course correct a problem that's gotten out of hand. And by doing that in a thoughtful.

[Sean Duffy]

Effective way, we're going to be able to get the pharmaceutical industry whole. Those jobs will still be here, will still be productive.

[Bob Pittman]

We'll still be curing cancer and a slew of other ailments that plague humanity. America will still be the leader in this space.

[Ben Ferguson]

But we're paying the appropriate amount, the.

[Bob Pittman]

Right sized amount for those tasks.

[Ben Ferguson]

Now, you may ask yourself this question. Why is the President doing this? Well, it's all in the numbers. The United States has less than 5% of the world's population, yet funds roughly 75% of global pharmaceutical profits. Here's the other thing you may not know. Drug manufacturers discount their products to gain access to foreign markets and then subsidize those discounts through high prices charged in America. In essence, you are subsidizing drug manufacturer profits. And foreign health systems are getting the big deal, despite drug manufacturers benefiting from generous research subsidies and enormous healthcare spending by the US Government. Now, in his first term, you may not know this, but President Trump took historic action to keep Medicare and seniors from paying more for drugs than economically comparable countries, which the Biden administration rescinded before it could even take effect. Why? Because they're owned by big pharma. Instead of fixing this problem, the Biden administration's greatest achievement was to negotiate prices that were on average 78% higher than an 11 comparable countries as part of Biden's efforts to, quote, beat Medicare in translation, the Democratic party sold you out. The Americans who are suffering and desperately need pharmaceutical drugs and they sold you out to the highest bidder, the lobbyists and the companies that came in and said this is what we need. The president making it clear this is never going to happen again in the U. S. And as long as he is president, he is going to fight for innovation, fight for technology, and make sure that you are paying less than any other major nation in the world.

[Ryan Seacrest]

And finally, story number three, Former roommate.

[Ben Ferguson]

You don't get to say this every day, is also the attorney general from West Virginia. We were together actually on Capitol Hill. I'm staring at the supreme Court right now. And he was in the supreme Court today for this important, this major case on judges power. And I want to go to you, JB on this so that you can explain how all this started. In essence, you had judges that were making decisions that were covering the entire country. And the argument is maybe that's not how it's supposed to be on these local levels or these, these smaller court battles. And this is what this is all about.

[J.B. McCuskey]

Yeah, I think you, what you just said there makes a lot of sense. This is a national issue that was dissolved, that was decided or attempted to be decided by a district court judge. And so what happens, and this has been happening a lot, especially very recently within the last 30 years, and it's a bipartisan problem, Ben, is that district court judges are enjoining presidential decrees. Right. And saying what the president has done is not just illegal in my courtroom, but it's illegal in the entire country. And our process is set up differently than that. Our district court judges are supposed to hear cases that are in front of them and make decisions for the plaintiffs that are in front of them here. Several interest groups in several states sued in a, I'm going to just say a friendly jurisdiction, which is how this works, is you find a judge that is ideologically aligned with you and you get them to enjoin an entire action that happened in this case in New Jersey. And so a New Jersey judge then decided for all other of the 600 district court judges and all of the circuit judges and ostensibly for the supreme Court, whether or not a presidential order was constitutional. While we did not get into the underlying facts of this case today. Ben, what the Supreme Court was hearing and what our brief described was the reasons why this is both unconstitutional and a bad idea. So for one, both the history of our courts, as you look back into the courts of Chancery in England, as well as Article 3, which was written to delineate the powers of our courts, indicate that circuit judges do not have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions. Further, our brief gets into the idea that there is a remedy here. And the remedy is that if you are looking to have a district court make a decision for a large number of people, you have to go through what's called a Rule 23 and create a class action. So then the court knows who the plaintiffs are that they're trying to address a problem for. And fourth, and maybe most importantly is that district courts and our federal court systems, they are life tenured for a reason. And that is to eliminate the stench of politics from, from the benches around the country. And when you do forum shopping and you start to use these universal injunctions in these sort of weaponized ways, what you then will find, I believe, and our brief delineates that the confidence that the public has in the independence of our judiciary will go down very quickly. And that is the single most important branch for the public to have confidence in, because it is their orders and it is their writings that tell every American how the Constitution is being interpreted as it relates to the laws that apply to them. So this is a really big case. We feel really, really good about our briefing. The people of West Virginia joined with a group called the American center for Law and justice in this briefing. And we're very hopeful that the court will use our amicus to guide them into what I believe is a proper decision. And that is the district courts lack the ability to adjoin the entire country as it relates to presidential executive orders.

[Ben Ferguson]

So let's talk about the amicus brief and break that down. The goal of an amicus brief and people that are listening. My guest with me is the Attorney General from West Virginia, J.B. mcCuskey. I want a dear friend of mine, former roommate, and we are, as I stare literally at the Supreme Court right now. You just left the Supreme Court where you guys filed this amicus brief with the aclj. What, what is the goal of an amicus brief for people that maybe don't understand that terminology, maybe they've never heard it before. And specifically, what did you guys put in that amicus brief that you're hoping that the Justices will get from it and read from it on this case.

[J.B. McCuskey]

Yeah. So an amicus brief is, in layman's term, it's called a friend of the court brief. And so what. What its purpose is is to help the justices as they're making their decision with parties who have an interest in the outcome of. And in West Virginia, the interest in this outcome comes from this widespread weaponized use of nationwide injunctions. We just saw within the last week, a nationwide injunction out of the state of Washington that will stop President Trump's executive orders on the use of coal and lowering electricity rates for Americans and putting West Virginia coal miners back to work today in order to meet our nation's energy needs. And so for us, these nationwide injunctions, when you're a small rural state, you're never going to be the forum that gets shopped into. Right. They're never going to ask real patriotic Americans like they are in West Virginia to answer these questions. They're going to go to places where it's a little different. And so we have a huge interest in ensuring that the process plays out in nationwide injunctions to make sure that these, the president's executive orders, as they relate to the economy and the people of West Virginia are upheld, and if they are found to be unconstitutional, that they go through the proper channels. And that is what our brief says. Our brief says that it isn't that the plaintiffs don't have any options. Our brief says the options that they chose are not available to the court that made them. So they needed to have gone through what's called a Rule 23, as I just said, and explained to the court why they have a class of plaintiffs that have a similar need for this same kind of relief. And then the court can order that those people get that relief. And then if another district court or another circuit court comes to a contrary conclusion, then the Supreme Court can use. The Supreme Court's power generally comes from when they are. They are deciding between circuits that have a different interpretation of the law. And in this instance, they circumvented that entire process by getting one single district court judge to speak for the entire country. And that is not allowed under Article 3. And it's a really bad idea in terms of public confidence in the independence of our judicial branch.

[Ben Ferguson]

Is it fair to say that the, the mechanism that's being used by the left to go and find these friendly judges and friendly courts to do this, is this a version of lawfare where you say we don't respect the people, we don't respect their vote. We don't respect who they chose as their leader, which this time happens to be President Donald J. Trump. And so therefore, we are going to use lawfare to stop the will of the people and what they voted for and what their leaders that they voted for, who wanted a free and fair election are trying to do.

[J.B. McCuskey]

Well, I hesitate to use the word lawfare here, Ben, because we do the same thing occasionally when there's Democrats in the White House. And it's not that we have a problem with challenging federal government edicts. Right. We as Republicans are constantly finding ways that the federal government is overstepping its bounds and we use the courts in order to rein them in, like in West Virginia versus epa. Right? So it isn't that. This is, it isn't lawfare as you describe it, because we need the option to be able to do this, too. It is the kind of lawfare, right? It is, it is this, this, this novel concept that you use a single friendly district court to do what is supposed to be the job of the entire judiciary. Right. There's a reason why our system is set up the way that it is. And I personally believe as an originalist, that the factual scenarios surrounding the reason why somebody's asking for something shouldn't change the fundamental role and the rules that surround our court. And that was really, in essence, the main part of this argument is should we break the rules? Because this is important. And my personal opinion is that is not true. We should maintain the constitutionally granted powers that exist in our district courts and allow the system, as it was created by our founders, to work. Because it does.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Thank you for listening to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson. Please make sure you hit subscribe wherever you're listening to this podcast right now. And for more in depth news, also subscribe to the Ben Ferguson Podcast and we will see you back here on Monday morning.

[Ben Ferguson]

The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews has supported and will continue to support the people of Israel with life saving security essentials. And your gift today will help save lives by providing bomb shelters, armored security vehicles, ambulances, firefighting equipment, flag jackets and bulletproof vests, and so much more. Give a gift to bless Israel and her people by visiting right now ifcj.org.

[Ryan Seacrest]

That'S ifcj.org this podcast is supported by Talkspace. When my husband came home from his military deployment, readjusting was hard for all of us. Thankfully, I found Talkspace. Talkspace provides professional support from licensed therapists and psychiatric providers online, military members, veterans and their dependents ages 13 and older can get fast access to providers, all from the privacy of their computers or smartphones. I just answered a few questions online, and Talkspace matched me with a therapist. We meet when it's convenient for me, and I can message her anytime. It was so easy to set up and they accept. Tricare. Therapy was going so well, my husband and I started seeing a couple's therapist through Talkspace too. Talkspace works with most major insurers, including Tricare. Match with a licensed therapist [e-mail] military go to talkspace.com military to get started today. That's talkspace.com military hi, I'm Bob Pittman, chairman and CEO of iHeartMedia. On this week's episode of Math and Magic, I'm sitting down with the one and only Bobby Bones. We're exploring the power of audio.

[Ben Ferguson]

Yeah, I don't fit into one specific hole. I think that is what endeared me to listeners. That's why I'm here now, because I talk to people that grew up like me, have sensibilities like me, and have loyalties like me.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Listen to Math and Magic stories from the frontiers of Marketing on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on demand?

[Ben Ferguson]

We're not boring.

[Ryan Seacrest]

A lot of news is boring and tedious and depress. Makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Ben Ferguson]

He's Joe Getty.

[Ryan Seacrest]

We're Armstrong and Getty.

[Ben Ferguson]

We try to bring you the truth.

[Ryan Seacrest]

And help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Bob Pittman]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Ben Ferguson]

We have a winner.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Yes. Listen to Armstrong and Yeti on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency. It became known as the Iran Contra affair.

[Bob Pittman]

The things that happened were so bizarre and insane, I can't begin to tell you.

[Ryan Seacrest]

Please do. To hear the whole story. Listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. You're listening to an iHeart podcast.