Fireworks in Judiciary Over Radical Judges Issuing Nationwide Injunctions, plus Colorado Terrorist Affiliated w Muslim Brotherhood

Summary

The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson Episode: Fireworks in Judiciary Over Radical Judges Issuing Nationwide Injunctions, plus Colorado Terrorist Affiliated w Muslim Brotherhood Release Date: June 4, 2025

In this riveting episode of The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson, host Ben Ferguson tackles two major national issues: the surge of nationwide injunctions issued by radical judges against the Trump administration and a chilling terrorist attack in Colorado connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. Joined by Senators Ted Cruz and Cory Booker, the episode offers a deep dive into the intersections of judiciary overreach, legislative responses, and national security threats.

---

1. Judiciary Overreach: Nationwide Injunctions Against the Trump Administration

Jack Armstrong initiates the discussion by addressing a concerning trend in the judiciary:

[00:50] Jack Armstrong: "Yesterday I chaired a hearing that was examining the abuse of power from individual district court judges who are issuing nationwide injunctions against President Trump and the Trump administration. This is the latest iteration of Lawfare."

Armstrong highlights the unprecedented nature of these injunctions:

[02:05] Jack Armstrong: "In the first 150 years of our nation's history, there was not a single nationwide injunction that was issued. Now, in the first five months of this past year, over 40 have been enacted against the Trump administration."

He criticizes the strategy employed by Democrats, labeling it as "lawfare" aimed at stalling policy implementation through legal challenges. Armstrong emphasizes the selective targeting of judges:

[03:00] Jack Armstrong: "These left-wing judges, appointed in very blue districts, are issuing orders saying, 'Stop deporting criminals.' It's a blatant attempt to undermine the will of the American voters."

---

2. Heated Exchange Between Senators Ted Cruz and Cory Booker

The episode features a contentious exchange between Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Cory Booker, shedding light on partisan divisions within the Senate.

Senator Ted Cruz asserts the gravity of the judiciary's actions and the Democrats' role:

[10:25] Senator Ted Cruz: "Should the Biden Justice Department have enforced the criminal law against protesting at a justice’s home? Yes or no?"

He contends that Democrats have been silent on enforcing federal laws that protect judicial officials:

[14:01] Senator Ted Cruz: "Their outrage is selective... not a single Democrat senator on this committee was willing to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland to account for flagrantly disregarding the federal criminal law."

Senator Cory Booker counters by highlighting bipartisan efforts to protect judges and refuting allegations of silence:

[10:55] Senator Cory Booker: "We joined together in a bipartisan way to protect those judges... We took action by passing a bipartisan bill to extend round-the-clock security protection."

The exchange becomes increasingly intense as Cruz accuses Booker and fellow Democrats of hypocrisy:

[14:42] Senator Ted Cruz: "You are very, very deep into the waters of hypocrisy in your criticisms of Chuck Schumer."

Booker defends the Democrats' actions, emphasizing their commitment to judicial safety and condemning Cruz's portrayal of their inaction.

[32:10] Senator Cory Booker: "The Democratic Party knew open borders would have disastrous consequences from a national security standpoint... They continued their open border policy because it was part of their bigger plan."

---

3. Colorado Terrorist Attack Linked to Muslim Brotherhood

Shifting focus to national security, Ben Ferguson discusses a recent terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, perpetrated by Mohammed Salman, an illegal immigrant affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Jack Armstrong provides a detailed account of the incident and its implications:

[26:00] Jack Armstrong: "Federal court filings obtained by Fox News reveal that Mohammed Salman admitted he wanted to kill all Zionist people and had been planning the attack for a year."

He connects the attack to the Biden administration's border policies:

[27:51] Jack Armstrong: "Four years of open borders allowed over 12 million people to enter the country illegally, with roughly 2 million getting away undetected. These 'gotaways' are significantly more likely to be criminals, murderers, rapists, child molesters, and terrorists."

Armstrong criticizes the administration's handling of border security:

[30:21] Jack Armstrong: "The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization... We saw the horrific and potentially deadly consequences this week in Boulder, Colorado because the Democrats were willing to let these radicals into the country."

Cory Booker acknowledges the national security risks posed by the Democratic open border strategy:

[28:48] Cory Booker: "The Democratic Party knew open borders would have disastrous consequences from a national security standpoint and continued with their policies despite the risks."

He underscores the necessity of legislative action to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization:

[32:10] Cory Booker: "We need to protect American citizens from such extremist threats by designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization."

---

4. Legislative Efforts to Combat Terrorism

Jack Armstrong elaborates on his legislative initiatives aimed at addressing the terrorist threat posed by the Muslim Brotherhood:

[30:27] Jack Armstrong: "The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization in countries throughout the Middle East. In the United States, we have yet to designate them as such, unlike Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Syria."

He expresses optimism about passing the designation under the current administration:

[33:12] Jack Armstrong: "I believe President Trump will finally take action to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, which is essential for national security."

---

5. Concluding Remarks and Call to Action

The episode wraps up with Ben Ferguson reiterating the importance of addressing these critical issues and encouraging listeners to stay informed and engaged.

[33:47] Ben Ferguson: "We do this show Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Make sure you hit that subscribe or auto-download button so that you do not miss an episode. Please write us a five-star review."

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Jack Armstrong on Nationwide Injunctions:

  [02:10] "The number would be zero. So the first 150 years of our nation's history, there was not a single nationwide injunction that was issued."

• Senator Ted Cruz on Enforcement:

  [10:25] "Should the Biden Justice Department have enforced the criminal law against protesting at a justice’s home? Yes or no?"

• Jack Armstrong on Border Policies:

  [27:51] "The Democrats were willing to bring in Muslim Brotherhood terrorists who are murdering people."

• Senator Cory Booker on Border Strategy:

  [28:48] "The Democratic Party knew open borders would have disastrous consequences from a national security standpoint."

• Jack Armstrong on Muslim Brotherhood Designation:

  [30:27] "The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization and should be designated as such in the United States."

---

Key Takeaways

1. Judiciary Overreach: There is a significant increase in nationwide injunctions against the Trump administration, which Jack Armstrong and Senator Cruz attribute to a strategic effort by Democrats to obstruct presidential policies through legal means.

2. Partisan Divides: The exchange between Senators Cruz and Booker highlights deep-seated partisan tensions regarding the role of the judiciary and the enforcement of federal laws protecting judicial officials.

3. National Security Threats: The Colorado terrorist attack underscores the perceived failures of the Biden administration's open border policies, with critiques focusing on the administration's alleged prioritization of political gains over national security.

4. Legislative Action: There is a strong push, particularly from Senator Cruz, to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization in the United States, aligning with actions taken by several Middle Eastern countries.

5. Bipartisan Efforts Questioned: While Senator Booker claims bipartisan efforts to protect judges, Senator Cruz argues that Democrats have been selectively silent on enforcing laws that would protect judicial officials, suggesting a double standard.

---

This comprehensive summary captures the essence of the episode, providing listeners with a clear understanding of the key discussions, debates, and insights shared by Ben Ferguson and his esteemed guests. The inclusion of direct quotes with timestamps enhances the depth and authenticity of the summary, making it a valuable resource for those seeking to grasp the critical issues addressed in the podcast.

Transcript

[iHeart Podcast]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Joe Getty]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on Demand?

[Jack Armstrong]

We're not boring.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

A lot of news is boring and tedious and depressing. It makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong.

[Joe Getty]

He's Joe Getty.

[Jack Armstrong]

We're Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

We try to bring you the truth.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

And help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Ben Ferguson]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Joe Getty]

We have a winner.

[iHeart Podcast]

Yes.

[Joe Getty]

Listen to Armstrong and Getty on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

Wherever you get your podcasts.

[Cory Booker]

Welcome. It is Verdict with Senator Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with you. It's really nice to have you with us on this Wednesday morning. And Senator, we've got two big topics to discuss today, including something in the Senate that got a little spicy between you and Cory Booker.

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, it did. So yesterday I chaired a hearing that was examining the abuse of power from individual district court judges who are issuing nationwide injunctions against President Trump and the Trump administration. And this is the latest iteration of Lawfare. This is in the last four years. We saw Democrat prosecutors indict Donald Trump four separate times. That was they were doing everything they could to stop the voters from re electing President Trump. That failed. Now, during the Trump presidency, we are seeing lawfare unfold. We are seeing Democrat attorneys general filing lawsuits every single day. We are seeing left wing activist groups filing lawsuits every day. And they are seeking out radical left wing judges who've been appointed in very blue districts. And what we have seen is we have seen over 40 nationwide injunctions against the Trump administration. Now, to give you a sense of just how egregious this is in the first 150 years of our nation's history. Ben, do you know how many nationwide injunctions were issued?

[Cory Booker]

I have no idea, but I'm guessing comparing it to 40, it's not going to be a lot.

[Jack Armstrong]

The number would be zero. So the first 150 years of our nation's history, there was not a single nationwide injunction that was issued. Now, how about the 20th century? The 20th century? The entire hundred years from 1900 to 1999. There have been more nationwide injunctions issued against the Trump administration in the first five months than there were in the entire 20th century. There have also been more nationwide injunctions issued against Trump than there have been during the George W. Bush presidency, plus the Barack Obama presidency, plus the Joe Biden presidency. All combined. This is an assault. You have left wing judges, individual radical district judges who are issuing Injunctions, trying to set aside the policies of the president and trying to set aside the will of the American voters. And it is an assault on democracy. And I gotta say, Democrats not only are okay with it, I, they're enthusiastically cheering it on.

[Cory Booker]

It really is shocking. And the level of, I think attack is obviously, as you mentioned, very clear. It is these judges are saying we're going to take away the power of the presidency. The dangerous aspect of that precedent is also something that I would hope that many people that maybe consider themselves to be moderate or liberal would be concerned about, because that's not how this country is supposed to work.

[Jack Armstrong]

No, it should not be an individual district judge having the ability to set aside the policies of the United States government, the President of the United States, and the policies that the voters voted on. Look, I think the single biggest issue in this last election was the voters were sick and tired of the open borders. We saw for four years the invasion of 12 million illegal immigrants. And they wanted a president to secure the border and to deport murderers, rapists, child molesters, violent Venezuelan gang members. That's what Donald Trump is doing. And we are seeing the Democrats who are suing over and over again, and they're getting radical left wing judges to issue orders saying, stop deporting criminals. And it's lawless, by the way, federal immigration law gives enormous power to the president to deport illegal immigrants. And these radical judges, they don't care. And I will tell you, as we were discussing this in this hearing, so the Democrats all showed up for this hearing and they were loaded for bear, and they were all attacking President Trump. That was no surprise. And they were saying, the president is horribly saying mean, mean things about judges. And mind you, these are judges who are dramatically abusing their power. And yet the Democrats were all pretending to be horrified that the president would criticize judges. Now, I want to play for you an exchange I had. I was talking about the hypocrisy of Democrats who are claiming to be defending judges. And yet when Joe Biden was president and you had violent mobs protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, the Democrats said not a word. They were not bothered at all that the Biden Justice Department refused to enforce the criminal law that makes it a crime to protest outside the home of a justice and to threaten the justice's families, as they were. And there was an exchange. So Cory Booker, he's a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, Cory wants to run for president. He wants to run as the great liberal hope. And Cory decided to engage with me and attack me on this issue. And he and I went back and forth and I want to play this entire exchange, it's a little bit extended. But this exchange was striking because he jumped in and he's like, no, no, no, I'm going to fight you on this point. And I've got to say, I don't want to be, be a spoiler here, but I don't think it went well for Corey. Give a listen.

[Cory Booker]

It did not. Here it is.

[Unknown Speaker]

Indulge me for a moment.

[Joe Getty]

We indulge you every moment.

[Unknown Speaker]

I appreciate that act of generosity. It's just something you said that I think is actually dangerous and should be, should be addressed. And you're welcome. But when Judge Anderol was killed in New Jersey, the Republican colleagues in the Senate, their outpouring of support, their outpouring of concern, they're willing to work together on a bipartisan bill was extraordinary. It shows the truth of this institution that despite some of the fiery rhetoric that you were selling, we're really a bipartisan working bipartisanship. Cornyn and Coons, after the incidents you're talking about, got together and actually passed a bill to better protect our Supreme Court justices, many of whom are friends of ours. You know, Gorsuch and I disagree on a lot of stuff. I knew his wife before he did. We studied together at Oxford. This implication that there was silence when there were threats on their people's houses is absolutely absurd. I remember the rhetoric and the comments, the concern from Coons. I actually distinctly remember you, Chairman, on more than once condemning those attacks on Republican appointed jurists. To say things like that feeds just the partisanship in this institution and feeds the fiery rhetoric. And it's just plain not true. It's just plain not true. And I think you know that. But we can pull from the record, from my colleagues in real time, literally days afterwards condemning it. There's a lot of substantive things to say here. But to think that the lack of humanity when people's homes are being threatened was not in existence, I think that's unfair and really concerns me that you would say that in the way that you did.

[Joe Getty]

Well, I thank my colleague from New Jersey. I will note, as John Adams observed, that facts are stubborn things and it is existing federal law, 18 USC Section 1507, that makes it a crime to protest at a judge's home. And the law provides whoever with the intent of interfering with, obstructing or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent or of influencing any judge, juror, witness or Court officer or in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness or court officer, or with such intent, uses any sound truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year or both. That is federal criminal law. Night after night after night, angry mobs were outside the Supreme Court Justices homes. And in the entire course of it, the Biden Justice Department prosecuted nobody. We had the Attorney General sitting at that table and multiple Republican senators asked him, why are you not enforcing the law when what they are doing is a crime? And my friend from New Jersey said it is a lie to say we the Democrats, condone this. I would challenge my friend find a single Democrat senator on this committee holding the Attorney General to account for not enforcing this law. I was here at those hearings and I do not recall a single Democrat senator saying to the Attorney General, you should arrest these people who are violating the law. You should protect the judges. I agree that there was general language against violence, but not a single Democrat senator that I ever saw in this committee was willing to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland to account for flagrantly disregarding the federal criminal law because the Biden administration agreed with the protesters and I think wanted those justices harassed at their home.

[Unknown Speaker]

I. I really appreciate that you now shifted the accusation you made earlier. Your accusation was that we were silent in the face of protests at Supreme Court Justices Homes. Again, we joined together in a bipartisan way not only to condemn that, but to pass legislation to extend round the clock security protection. Literally days was introduced May 5, passed the Senate in a bipartisan fashion on May 9. So if you're saying that we didn't.

[Joe Getty]

Criticize DOJ arrest a single person under.

[Unknown Speaker]

This law, you are now changing the.

[Joe Getty]

No. That is what I said. That is what I said.

[Unknown Speaker]

Again, I'll pull the record.

[Joe Getty]

Did the Biden DOJ arrest even one? Again, the answer is no.

[Unknown Speaker]

My point to you is the accusation that the Democrats on this committee do not care about the safety. All right, so let me ask federal judges. I did not interrupt you, sir. I would appreciate if you let me finish. I am sick and tired of hearing the kind of heated partisan rhetoric which is one of the reasons why we have such divisions in this country. The attacks we see from the President of the United States of America, trolling and dragging judges through is what we should be talking about that puts people in danger. I'm simply taking issue with the claim that you made at the top that people on the Democratic side of the aisle do not care about the safety and the security of judges and said nothing. You said we were silent after people's houses were protested. That is a patent lie, sir. We were not silent. We took action. We've joined in a bipartisan way to protect those judges, as was done in a bipartisan way to protect a New Jersey judge after their horrific attack at their home. So I see you now trying to shift the debate to whether we talk to an attorney general. I'm simply taking issue with this accusation that somehow we Democrats are so bad because we don't call out threats to our. To our judicial colleagues. And that is wrong. You could change the argument now that you want, but what you said was patently not true and was, in fact, a patent lie.

[Joe Getty]

So I do do enjoy the fact that my colleague from New Jersey raises his voice and says it's a patent lie and says he's doing so in defense of. Of lowering the rhetoric. There is some irony to doing those two together. I'll point out that in the entire course of those remarks, Senator Booker did not dispute the central point I made, which is the Biden Justice Department arrested zero people, prosecuted zero people for violating the criminal law. And every Democrat senator on this committee was silent about it. And this was an ongoing pattern for months. And I would note also that the senator from New Jersey clutched his pearls about language threatening judges. And yet I do not recall a single Democrat senator of this committee saying a word when Chuck Schumer went to the steps of the Supreme Court and threatened the safety of the Supreme Court justices by name, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. And he said, you have unleashed the whirlwind and you will pay the price. And not a single Democrat senator had a word to say about this. And so their outrage is selective. And I will give my colleague from New Jersey a chance to just answer a simple yes, no question. Should the Biden Justice Department have enforced the criminal law against protesting at a justice's home? Yes or no?

[Unknown Speaker]

So the rank hypocrisy of Chuck Schumer apologizing the next day and you holding that standard for him and not for your president, who you actually rightfully described when you were running against him in a primary. I would love to run those tapes of how you perfectly talked about the danger of our president and his rhetoric. But now you are failing, in fact, blind, to the very things you're accusing Chuck Schumer of. I don't think Donald Trump would know an apology if it hit him in the head. Never said apologizing. So again, you are very, very, sir, very, very deep into the waters of hypocrisy in your criticisms of Chuck Schumer.

[Joe Getty]

So let the record reflect that Spartacus did not answer the question and did not tell us whether the criminal law should be enforced because he knows the answer is yes. And he knows that the Biden Department of Justice was being wildly political and partisan. And in refusing to enforce the law because they disagreed with the Supreme Court justices rulings.

[Cory Booker]

That was one very entertaining back and forth. Senator. I wish there was actually more of this in the Senate because it's a great moment where you can see two very different viewpoints, two very different ways of looking at this. And like you said, it did not go well for Cory Booker. But I actually love that there's this type of grand debate.

[Jack Armstrong]

Absolutely. We need to have this engagement. We need to have this engagement on ideas. And it's striking the Democrats, they claim they support democracy, but yet when it comes to Donald Trump, they want a single unelected district judge striking down every policy he implements. And they don't care that the American people voted for it. They want power. And look, in the course of this hearing, there were a couple of points I made that no Democrat had a response to. Number one, these lawsuits are being filed over and over again before radical left wing judges. Of the 40 plus nationwide injunctions that have been issued against the Trump administration, 35 of them have been in five jurisdictions, five left wing jurisdictions. They're seeking out these left wing judges because they know that they'll rule for them. And the Democrat defense says, well, gosh, Trump is just violating the law. Well, you know what, if that were true, you'd be willing to file the cases anywhere. But you're not the Democrat attorneys general. The left wing interest groups are going to seek out the radicals because they know the radicals will rule for them. And we're not seeing Democrat senators defend that position. We're not seeing them, say, give any explanation as to why one radical judge should be able to set aside nationwide the policies of the President of the United States who was elected by the American people to secure the borders, to bring us back to common sense positions. And so I think this hearing was important. And I got to say, I think Cory Booker. Listen, Corey is running for President of the United States. That's not complicated. He's going to run in 2020. 8 and he's running in the left lane of the Democrat party. So he's going to take on Elizabeth Warren, he's going to take on aoc, and he's going to argue I am, I am liberal Democrat here, mirror. But at the end of the day trying to appeal to those radicals, you got a problem of you actually got to address the substance. And I think today we did. And it was not the outcome he was hoping for.

[Cory Booker]

It certainly was not. And it's one of those moments that I'll be ventured to see when this audio and video comes back to haunt him down the road when that presidential run you mentioned. Because I think he thought he was about to have a moment and it's not the moment he probably was hoping for. If you go back and look at.

[iHeart Podcast]

That tape, you know, in the book of Genesis, God makes a promise to your offspring. I promise this land. Now that promise is the foundation of Israel. A land the Jewish people have returned to after centuries of exile and bondage and even the horrors of the Holocaust. But that promise is still under threat. Especially after October 7th. Now Israel's safety today depends on the very brave men and women of the idf, the Israeli Defense Forces. Every citizen is required to serve. Your gift of $45 will help provide aid to soldiers and their families to by helping to provide food and other bare necessities for these families and emergency supplies for soldiers now, you can help secure their future. Honor those who are defending the holy land. Call now 888488 IFCJ. That's 888488 IFCJ. Just go to their website, it's IFCJ.org and you can give Today they are in desperate need of help.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

Looking for a smarter way to teach your child to ride a bike and support American jobs at the same time. Most kids bikes are cheap imports, heavy, clunky and hard for kids to control. Guardian Bikes is changing that. Assembling bikes right here in the USA with plans for full US manufacturing in the next few months. It's a commitment to higher quality and American craftsmanship you can trust. Each bike is lightweight, low to the ground and built to help kids learn to ride faster. Many in just one day. No training wheels needed. Guardian's patented SureStop braking system. One lever stops both wheels giving your child more control, faster stops and prevents those scary head over handlebar accidents. It's so easy even a 2 year old can do it. If you're ready to support American jobs and keep your kids Safe, head to guardianbikes.com today you'll save hundreds compared to the competition. Join their newsletter. You'll get a free bike lock and pump, a $50 value guardian bikes built in the USA made specifically for kids.

[Matt Gaetz]

Hey, Matt Gaetz here. Listen, after everything we've been through the last few years, saying we have trust issues is an understatement. They pushed a questionable vaccine and when we asked for alternatives like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, they shut us down. They used pressure lies and red tape to block access to medications that were once easy to get. That cannot happen again. And with All Family Pharmacy it won't. All Family Pharmacy is redefining healthcare. No waiting rooms, no delays, no insurance games. Just direct access to over 200 trusted medications including ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, menbendazole, antibiotics, emergency kits, and so much more. You can customize your order and have it shipped straight to your door. They believe in medical freedom. You decide what works for your health, not some bloated system. Over 100,000Americans already trust them and maybe it's time you do too. Go to allfamilypharmacy.com for and use code USA10 for 10% off your first order. Again, that's allfamilypharmacy.com USA with code USA10 for 10% off.

[Ben Ferguson]

Finally, pro family movies, movies that you want your kids and grandkids to see, movies you want to see are being made again by my friends at Angel Studios and the record breaking animated movie King of Kings Over Easter was just one example of that. Well now there's another great movie coming out and I want to give you two free tickets. Angel has a family driven blockbuster, the Last Rodeo starring my favorite actor Neil McDonough, in theaters May 23. The Last Rodeo celebrates the inspiring story of a veteran PBR champion who returns to bull riding in his old age to save the life of his grandson and features real life PBR stars. Now I'm going to give you tickets right now and you can become a premium member of Angel Studios, a membership that puts you in the driver's seat. To help a Angel Studios choose which movies it green lights for you and your family and then you're gonna get those two free tickets to see the Last Rodeo and every single movie released from angel as well. Go to Angel.comVerdict now and get your two free tickets to the last rodeo today. That's Angel.comVerdict and join the Angel Guild and stream other Neil McDonough hits like Homestead and the Shift and more exclusively on Angel. As a guild member, you'll be part of more than 1 million Americans who are reshaping Face of Family Entertainment. So go to angel.com verdict and sign up today. I can't wait to see this movie and help choose the rest of Angels movies this year.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

In the fall of 1986, Ronald Reagan found himself at the center of a massive scandal that looked like it might bring down his presidency.

[Jack Armstrong]

Did you make a mistake in sending.

[Joe Getty]

Arms to Tehran, sir?

[Unknown Speaker]

No.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

It became known as the Iran Cross Contra affair.

[Unknown Speaker]

And I'm not taking any more questions. In just a second, I'm going to ask.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

I'm Leon Nayfak, co creator of Slow Burn. In my podcast, Fiasco Iran Contra, you'll hear all the unbelievable details of a scandal that captivated the nation nearly 40 years ago, but which few of us still remember today.

[Joe Getty]

The things that happened were so bizarre.

[Jack Armstrong]

And insane, I can't begin to tell you.

[Unknown Speaker]

Please do.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

To hear the whole story. Listen to Fiasco Iran Contra on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Cory Booker]

I want to also get to this other big issue and that is out in Colorado and the terror attack there. We've got a significant update on this individual and, and also real concerns and honesty now coming from the administration about the real threat of other terrorists that may be in this country that were led into this country by the Biden and Harris administration.

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, it turns out that four years of open borders, allowing over 12 million people to come into this country illegally, that was a really bad policy. And even worse, look, there were 10 million people who were apprehended by the Biden administration. They let them go. That, that is problematic on many, many fronts. But the most disturbing number is 2 million there. Roughly 2 million got aways. Those are people that cross the border, we know cross the border, but yet they escaped detection. And those gotaways are much, much more likely to be criminals. They're much more likely to be murderers, rapists, child molesters, terrorists, gang members. And if you look at this radical who attacked and firebombed the peaceful Jewish protesters in Boulder, Colorado, this was a guy who never should have been in this country to begin with. He came in on a tourist visa. He overstayed it. And this was a radical Islamist. And I want to read to you a tweet from Bill Millusian. Now, regular listeners of this podcast know Bill Malusion is the best reporter in America. He reports for Fox News and he's been detailing what's going on at the border? Here's what Bill Malusion tweeted. Breaking new details on Colorado terror attack suspect as feds charge him with federal hate crime. According to federal court filings obtained by Fox News, Egyptian illegal alien Mohammed Salman admitted in an interview that he wanted to kill all, quote, Zionist people and he had been planning the attack for a year and that he would conduct the attack again if he could. He allegedly told investigators that he waited to carry out the attack until his daughter graduated high school and that he specifically targeted the, quote, Zionist group in Boulder after learning about them from an online search. It was premeditated, as he allegedly admitted he knew they would gather On Sunday at 1pm he arrived and waited for them. Additionally, investigators found a black container with 14 more Molotov cocktails near the spot he was arrested in. Inside his vehicle, investigators found paperwork with the words Israel, Palestine and usaid. This man was admitted into the country via a tourist visa during the Biden administration. He overstayed, filed an asylum request and was granted work authorization by the Biden administration, which expired at the end of March of this year. So understand this guy came into this country, he overstayed his visa, and yet the Biden administration said, hey, look, a radical Islamic terrorist. We want you to stay. It was not hard to figure out from his social media who this guy was. But the Biden administration, they were not focused on defending this nation. They were not focused on stopping terrorists from coming in this country. Instead, they made a political decision. I get asked all the time, Ben, why would Democrats open up the borders? It clearly hurt them in the last election. Why would they do this? And I believe it was entirely about power. They viewed 12 million illegal immigrants. They said, listen, every one of these we think are going to vote for Democrats. We want them in here. Some portion of them will vote illegally. The rest of them, they believed if they stayed in power, they grant amnesty and make them all voters. And if they have to bring in Muslim Brotherhood terrorists who are murdering people, sadly, the Democrats were willing to do that.

[Cory Booker]

Yeah. This is the part that I really think we do need to make it clear, not just now, but in the future. The Democratic Party, and you alluded to this in your comments there, their plan, they knew, was going to have disastrous consequences from a national security standpoint. They were willing to play Russian roulette with that open border and they were warned and they saw the people that were on the terrorist watch list, Senator, and they didn't care because it was their overall plan to flood the country with illegal immigrants and fundamentally change this country. They knew this plan would allow for people that are terrorists, some of them on the terrorist watch list at the time, to get into this country. And they still continued to have the open border policy because they basically said, hey, it's part of our bigger plan and there's going to be collateral damage from this. So be it.

[Jack Armstrong]

And listen, when I say this, this sounds harsh. And you sort of think of a listener who's not terribly political, and they're like, wait, the Democrats couldn't really want more terrorists in this country. But at the end of the day, that was the inevitable consequence of. Of the policies they put in place when you allow 12 million people to cross the border illegally. And by the way, the Biden border control, the border patrol, they instructed their agents, be on the lookout for Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists coming across this border. Look, we have radical zealots who have declared jihad in America, who have demanded of their terrorists murder as many Americans as you can and murder as many Jews and Israelis as you can. And in the face of those very real and clear national security threats, the fact that the Biden administration, the Democrats, it wasn't just Joe Biden. It wasn't just Kamala Harris. It was every single Democrat in the Senate. It was every single Democrat in the House because they voted in favor of open borders over and over and over again. They knew that some of the people coming were just like this, radical. And listen, I've reintroduced this week legislation to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. The Muslim Brotherhood, this is something you've.

[Cory Booker]

Been sounding the alarm on for quite some time. I want to be very clear about that.

[Jack Armstrong]

So I've been fighting for this legislation for more than a decade. The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization. It is in countries throughout the Middle East. It is in Egypt, it is in Qatar. It is all across the Middle East. And the Muslim Brotherhood, openly, aggressively, they support Hamas, they support Hezbollah. They are a terrorist organization. And by the way, to be clear, in Egypt, they're an actual political party. Look, we had Mohammed Morsi, who was the leader of Egypt, who was a Muslim Brotherhood radical. Now, thankfully, Mohammed Morsi was defeated, and he was defeated by El Sisi, who is fighting against the Muslim Brotherhood. Look, if you look at the Arabs who are dealing with this, the Muslim Brotherhood and the jihadists, they believe in using violence, using murder to force people to embrace their radical Islamist view. And. And yet these are. These are the radicals that are fighting that. That are murdering Israelis and that are murdering Americans. And, and, and this is exactly the radicals that this lunatic in Boulder, Colorado was embracing and that Joe Biden and the Democrats were letting into this country.

[Cory Booker]

Final question on the designate of Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. Is this finally going to be the moment where you think there's a decent chance that this can become reality or there's still going to be Democrats at all costs that say we are going to defend this?

[Jack Armstrong]

So I hope so. So right now, today, the Muslim Brotherhood is designated as a terrorist organization in Saudi Arabia. They're designated in the United Arab Emirates. They're designated in Egypt, in Syria and Bahrain. But the United States has yet to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. When you have a group that actively encourages the waging of jihad, the murdering of innocents, they are a terrorist organization. And so I pressed, I pressed the entire first Trump term for the Muslim Brotherhood to be designated. We did not succeed. I think we will succeed this administration. I think President Trump is going to do this. And I'm going to keep pressing designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization because that is who they are. And we saw the horrific and potentially deadly consequences this week in Boulder, Colorado.

[Cory Booker]

It's incredible story and it's a sad one. It's also one that we must keep following and keep fighting to protect American citizens. We're going to keep keeping you updated on this story moving forward here on verdict. I promise you that. Don't forget, we do this show Monday, Wednesday and Friday. So make sure you hit that subscribe or auto download button so that you do not miss an episode. Please write us a five star review. It helps us reach new listeners more than you can imagine. So if you've not done that, please do that and share this wherever you are. Like I said on social media and the center now, we'll see you back here Friday morning.

[Ben Ferguson]

Wholesome family entertainment is so important, especially for my family with my three boys. And there's a new movie I want you to know about. I want to give you free tickets. The Last Rodeo, Angel Studios newest family Blockbuster starring Neil McDonough hits theaters May 23rd. And become a premium member right now and get two free tickets to see the Last Rodeo on the big screen. Plus you can stream other angel exclusives like Homestead, the Shift and more, help choose which movies get made and support film and filmmakers that share our values. So join the angel guild [e-mail] verdict that's angel.com verdict. Don't miss the Last Rodeo. Only in theaters.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

Why should you listen to Armstrong and Getty on Demand.

[Jack Armstrong]

We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

Tedious and depressing and makes you angry. You don't want to live your life like that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong. He's Joe Getty. We're Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

We try to bring you the truth.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

And help you figure out this crazy modern world.

[Ben Ferguson]

How about something about a comedic tone?

[Joe Getty]

We have a winner. Yes. Listen to Armstrong and Yeti on Demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or.

[Senator Ted Cruz]

Wherever you get your podcasts.

[iHeart Podcast]

This is an iHeart podcast.