Government Busted Paying Media Millions while Dems Move to Impeach Trump as he De-funds Sanctuary Cities

Summary

The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson: Detailed Summary

Episode Title: Government Busted Paying Media Millions while Dems Move to Impeach Trump as he De-funds Sanctuary Cities
Release Date: February 6, 2025

In this compelling episode of The 47 Morning Update, host Ben Ferguson delves into three major headlines shaping the political landscape of America. The episode uncovers alarming revelations about government funding of major media outlets, the Democratic Party's intensified efforts to impeach President Donald Trump for the third time, and Attorney General Pam Bondi's decisive actions to defund sanctuary cities. Below is a comprehensive breakdown of the key discussions, insights, and conclusions drawn during the episode.

---

1. Government Funding of Media Outlets Exposed

Overview:
The episode kicks off with a groundbreaking exposé on how the U.S. government has been funneling millions of taxpayer dollars to major media organizations like Politico, The New York Times, and the Associated Press. These payments, initially masked as "subscriptions," appear to have been strategically used to influence media coverage against President Trump and conservative movements.

Key Points:

• Elon Musk's Revelation: The scandal was brought to light by Elon Musk, who uncovered that federal agencies allocated substantial funds to media outlets under the guise of legitimate subscriptions.

• Government's Motive: The primary question raised is what the government was receiving in return. The implication is that these payments were not for unbiased reporting but rather for orchestrating media attacks against political opponents.

• Specifics of the Funding:

  • Politico: Between 2024 and 2025, over $9.5 million was allocated to Politico for subscriptions, which Ferguson suggests were essentially funds for anti-Trump propaganda. Departments such as Health and Human Services, Interior, Energy, Agriculture, and Commerce were major contributors.
  • The New York Times: Receiving more than $350,000 annually since 2022, with total contributions amounting to millions, likely tied to coverage on COVID-19 and other politically sensitive topics.
  • Associated Press: Secured tens of millions since 2008, indicating a long-term strategy to influence news reporting.

Notable Quotes:

• Caroline Levitt, White House Press Secretary:
  "[...] the more than $8 million taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico on the American taxpayers' dime will no longer be happening." [02:31]

Implications:

• Transparency and Accountability: The revelation demands a thorough investigation into federal funding practices and media independence.
• Political Manipulation: The usage of taxpayer money to influence media narratives undermines democratic principles and erodes public trust in both government and press institutions.
• Government Response: Caroline Levitt announced plans to cancel these payments, emphasizing a shift towards more transparent and accountable use of federal funds.

---

2. Democrats' Renewed Push to Impeach President Trump

Overview:
With the exposure of government funding influencing media coverage, the Democratic Party's resolve to impeach President Trump intensifies. Representative Al Green led the charge, signaling the initiation of impeachment procedures for the third time against the President.

Key Points:

• Representative Al Green's Announcement: Al Green declared the start of the impeachment movement, framing it as a grassroots initiative driven by public demand for justice.

• Motivation Behind Impeachment:

  • Loss of Control Mechanism: The Democrats previously leveraged kickbacks and funding to maintain political dominance, but the recent scandal has stripped them of this leverage, prompting a direct assault on Trump's presidency.
  • Moral Imperative: Green emphasized the necessity of impeachment as a moral duty, stating, "On this issue, I stand alone, but I stand for justice." [07:42]

• Support within the Democratic Party: While initially there was resistance, current sentiments indicate a consensus among Democrats that impeachment is inevitable.

Notable Quotes:

• Representative Al Green:
  "I rise to announce that the movement to impeach the president has begun. I rise to announce that I will bring articles of impeachment against the president for dastardly deeds proposed and dastardly deeds done. [...] I stand for justice." [07:42]

Implications:

• Political Turmoil: A third impeachment attempt signifies deepening divisions within the government and could lead to unprecedented political instability.
• Public Perception: The grassroots framing of the impeachment may galvanize public support or opposition, depending on individual political leanings.
• Legal and Constitutional Challenges: This move will likely face legal scrutiny and raise questions about the grounds and process for impeachment, especially after two previous attempts.

---

3. Attorney General Pam Bondi's Directive to Defund Sanctuary Cities

Overview:
Attorney General Pam Bondi has taken swift and decisive action to align the Department of Justice with President Trump's strict immigration policies. Her directive to halt federal funding for sanctuary cities marks a significant shift in federal immigration enforcement strategy.

Key Points:

• Immediate Actions: Upon her swearing-in, Bondi issued orders to:

  • Combat the weaponization of the legal system.
  • Encourage prosecutors to seek the death penalty where appropriate.
  • Collaborate with Homeland Security to dismantle cartels and transnational criminal organizations.

• Defunding Sanctuary Cities:

  • Directive Details: A 60-day pause on federal funding to jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
  • Targeted Areas: Major sanctuary jurisdictions like New York, California, and Connecticut may face substantial budgetary shortfalls.
  • Future Contracts: The DOJ will no longer engage with NGOs that support or provide services to illegal immigrants.

• Legal and Financial Implications:

  • Potential Lawsuits: Similar to previous efforts, this move is expected to provoke legal challenges from affected cities and states.
  • Budgetary Strain: Sanctuary cities reliant on federal funds may encounter significant financial hardships, impacting public services and infrastructure.

Notable Quotes:

• Pam Bondi's Directive (Paraphrased):
  "Aggressively enforce criminal laws passed by Congress, but also vigorously defend presidential policies and actions on behalf of the United States against legal challenges." [13:01]

Implications:

• Policy Enforcement: This directive signifies a robust enforcement of federal immigration laws, aiming to compel states and cities to comply with national standards.
• Political Backlash: Sanctuary cities and their supporters are likely to challenge the directive legally, leading to prolonged court battles.
• Social Impact: Reduced federal funding could exacerbate challenges in sanctuary cities, affecting services for both residents and immigrants.

---

Conclusion

In this episode of The 47 Morning Update, Ben Ferguson skillfully unpacks a series of interconnected political maneuvers that highlight the ongoing power struggles within the U.S. government. From the illicit funding of media outlets to the intensified impeachment efforts against President Trump and the aggressive defunding of sanctuary cities, the episode paints a comprehensive picture of a nation grappling with deep-seated political conflicts and ethical dilemmas.

Key Takeaways:

• Media Independence Under Threat: The misuse of federal funds to influence media narratives poses a significant threat to unbiased journalism and democratic integrity.
• Impeachment as a Political Tool: The renewed push to impeach President Trump underscores the lengths to which the Democratic Party may go to maintain political control.
• Immigration Policy Enforcement: Attorney General Pam Bondi's actions reflect a stringent approach to immigration enforcement, signaling potential upheaval for sanctuary jurisdictions.

For listeners seeking an in-depth analysis of these critical issues, this episode serves as an essential resource, providing clarity and insight into the rapidly evolving political dynamics of the United States.

---

Subscribe to The 47 Morning Update on the iHeartRadio app or your preferred podcast platform to stay informed with Ben Ferguson’s latest insights and exclusive commentary on the issues shaping America today.

Transcript

[Donald Trump]

He just left Panama. We're trying to take back the Panama Canal, little things like that. My administration will not stand by and watch men beat and batter female athletes. Going to end. And it's ending right now. And nobody's going to be able to do a damn thing about it because when I speak, we speak with authority.

[Ben Ferguson]

You're listening to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson.

[News Anchor]

Happy Thursday morning. It is February 5th, 2025. And here are the big stories we're covering Today on the 47 Morning Update. First up, the state sponsored media, those covering for the Democrats and shocking news have actually been paid for years millions of dollars of your tax money, including the Associated Press and Politico. It's all been uncovered by Elon Musk. So what will happen next? I'll explain it to you. Also, the Democrats are furious at what's happening in our government, the downsizing and the corruption being exposed. So what did they decide to do? They're now moving to impeach Donald Trump for a third time. I'll explain who's behind it in just a moment. And finally, on the very first day on the job, the attorney general, Pam Bondi orders the Department of Justice to pause all federal funding for sanctuary cities. It is the 47 Morning Update and it starts right now. Story number one, this may become the biggest scandal in news media history. The United States government handing over millions and millions of dollars to independent news companies. The question now is what was the government getting in return? And the second question that everyone should be asking is why did the money skyrocket? To the New York Times, the Associated Press, Politico and many others after they started criticizing Donald Trump. Well, the answer may be very simple. The United States government under the Biden and Harris regime were bribing the media to attack their political opponents and giving them millions of dollars in the process. Now, the White House press secretary, Caroline Levitt confirmed reports that millions in federal funding went to Politico and other media organizations declaring that taxpayer dollars would no longer essentially subsidize subscriptions. That's how they titled the payments to news outlets to prop them up and in reality, paying for coverage that they wanted to attack opponents, which was Donald Trump and the conservative movement.

[Caroline Levitt]

And I can confirm that the more than 8 million taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico on the American taxpayers dime will no longer be happening. The Doge team is working on canceling those payments.

[News Anchor]

Now.

[Caroline Levitt]

Again, this is a whole of government effort to ensure that we are Going line by line when it comes to the federal government's books. And this president and his team are making decisions across the board on do these receipts serve the interests of the American people? Is this a good use of the American taxpayers money? If it is not, that funding will no longer be sent abroad and American taxpayers will see significant savings because of that effort.

[News Anchor]

So let's talk about this scheme and how it worked. Well, between the years 2024 and 2025 alone, federal agencies allocated more than $9.5 million to POLITICO for what they described as subscriptions. The reality, Politico was writing articles that Donald Trump and other conservatives. You could say this was a pay to play scheme. Departments such as the Health and Human Services, the Interior, Energy department, Agriculture and Commerce were among the, quote, primary subscribers. The question American taxpayers should ask is how many subscriptions did you need, $9.5 million worth to do your jobs at those departments? Or were you buying attack ads, in essence, to attack the people that may be asking questions about what you're doing in those different departments of. We also found out Politico wasn't the only one on the take, apparently the New York Times, they could be purchased as well. And the Associated Press. Since 2022, the New York Times has received more than $350,000 annually from federal agencies, with total contributions amounting to millions and millions. Since 2008, the Associated Press has also secured tens of million dollars for its news wire services. And then there was another problem, and that is the fact that when these companies started writing really nasty articles about Donald Trump, just like politico did when they said that the Hunter Biden laptop story was fake news and not real. The money started to flow in at record pace. Now, it wasn't just political attacks that seemed to jump as the money flowed from the democratic government under Biden and Harris, but also when they needed cover on other issues like Covid. How do we know this? Well, here's a great example. The bulk of the funds, for example, that went to the New York Times, the tens of millions of dollars over just the past five years. Well, the bulk of it came from the u. S. Department of health and human services at 26.9 million, followed by the national science foundation at 19.15 million. Why would the New York Times be receiving that much money? Well, I'm sure we won't get a straight answer, but you could guess it had something to do with the coverage of COVID 19. And you may be asking about the other government departments that were paying out massive amounts of money to these private media companies. Well, there were some other big stories they need some help on as well. Maybe promoting pro Ukraine war funding or writing stories that were anti Trump in the run up to the election or even now, maybe the anti Elon Musk propaganda. The moral of the story is it all makes a lot more sense now when you follow the money.

[Ben Ferguson]

Now, story number two, the conspiracy in.

[News Anchor]

Government for control and power is now being exposed at a level that none of us, I think, even could have imagined before Doge got a hold of the government's receipts. And I never would have thought I could say this in my lifetime, but in government right now, Donald Trump may not be the most hated man by the Democratic Party or the liberal media. It may actually be a guy by the name of Elon Musk. But the person who's giving him his power is still Donald Trump, the president. Now, there's some new US Aid spinning that has also been uncovered. I'll give you a few of the highlights real quick before I explain exactly why they're now calling for Donald Trump to be in peach for the third time. $2 million for Moroccan pottery classes has been exposed. Another 2 million of your tax dollars promoting tourism to Lebanon. 20 million for a Sesame street show in Iraq. Sending Ukrainians to Paris for Fashion Week you paid for as well. 1.5 million of your tax dollars for DEI in Serbia, 70,000 for a DEI musical in Ireland, 47,000 of your tax dollars for a transgender opera in Colombia, 2 million for sex change operations in Guatemala, and 6 million for you to pay for tourism to be exciting in Egypt and 1 million to help disabled people in Tazakhstan become, quote, climate leaders. This on top of the 15 million for contraceptives and condoms that were going to the Taliban controlled Afghanistan. Now these are just some of the things that we know about. Much more is coming out and what this means is, is the kickbacks that the Democrats were able to use to control people. Well, that gravy train is now stopped. So what have they decided to do? Impeach Donald Trump for a third time. Representative Al Green went to the floor of the House to explain exactly why Democrats are moving to impeach Donald Trump.

[Al Green]

I rise to announce that the movement to impeach the president has begun. I rise to announce that I will bring articles of impeachment against the president for dastardly deeds proposed and dastardly deeds done. I also rise to say that the impeachment movement is going to be a grass up movement, not A top down. The people have got to move forward. The people have to demand it. And when the people demand it, it will be done. I did it before. I laid the foundation for impeachment and it was done. Nobody knows more about it than I, and I know that it's time for us to lay the foundation again. On some issues, it is better to stand alone than not stand at all. On this issue, I stand alone, but I stand for justice. I yield back the balance of my time.

[News Anchor]

Representative Al Green making it clear, quote, the movement to impeach the president has begun and I rise to announce that I will bring the articles of impeachment against President Trump. The media jumping all over this, excited about the fact that Donald Trump, who's been impeached twice, well, will more than likely, as they described it, be impeached yet again. This move marks a continuation of the Democrats previous efforts to get rid of Donald Trump during his first term, none of which were successful despite resistance from top House Democrats who are currently not prioritizing impeachment was how it was described to the media. Green stressed the moral imperative that it is time that we go ahead and start the process. Other Democrats coming to his aid, saying, we all know Donald Trump's going to get impeached again. It's just a matter of time. This time, however, it seems to be a little bit different. They are forced to do it now because they've lost the kickbacks they need to control so many around the world.

[Ben Ferguson]

And lastly, story number three.

[News Anchor]

We finally have a new Attorney General in this country, a woman by the name of Pam Bondi. And she wasted no time after being sworn in at the Oval Office with Clarence Thomas, giving her the oath to get right down to business on several major directives in her first hours leading the Justice Department. What was included was orders to combat the weaponization of the legal system, make prosecutors seek the death penalty when appropriate, and work with the Department of Homeland Security to completely eliminate cartels and and transnational criminal organizations. Now, Bondi was confirmed by the Senate on Tuesday night as the Attorney General and sworn in on Wednesday. What we now know is that memos are outlining Bondi's first aid directives, which will lay the groundwork for the Justice Department. Under her leadership, Bondi issued a directive regarding zealous advocacy, saying the DOJ attorneys responsibilities include, quote, aggressively enforcing criminal laws passed by Congress, but also vigorously defending presidential policies and actions on behalf of the United States against legal challenges. The discretion afforded Justice Department attorneys with respect to those responsibilities does not include latitude to substitute their personal political views or judgment for those that prevailed in the election, the memo states in translation. Pam Bondi says do your job and leave your politics at the door. Now this isn't all that Pam Bondi pushed. One of the biggest things was making sure that sanctuary cities were defunded by the federal government. Yes, Pam Bonnie also issued a directive to halt all federal funding to sanctuary jurisdictions, cities and states that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. This order mandates an immediate 60 day pause on fund distribution, during which the Department of Justice will review existing agreements with these jurisdictions. Now, this review aims to identify and terminate agreements that violate federal law or are deemed wasteful, fraudulent or abusive. In other words, if you're protecting illegal immigrants and not working with ice, do not expect to get federal funds. Bondi's directive also stipulates that the DOJ shall not enter into new contracts, grants or agreements with non governmental organizations known as NGOs, that support or provide services to illegal aliens. This move aligns with the Trump administration's broader strategy to enforce federal immigration laws and compel sanctuary jurisdictions to comply with federal law. Now the decision has significant implications for sanctuary jurisdictions such as New York, California, Connecticut, which may face major budgetary challenges due to the potential loss of federal funds. These areas rely on federal funding for various services and the pause could strain their resources, especially especially amid ongoing challenges related to being a sanctuary city with all of the costs and overhead for dealing with the illegal immigrants. Now the move to defund sanctuary cities is expected to face legal challenges. This is something the White House knew going into the decision. This is similar to the efforts during President Trump's first term led to lawsuits from affected jurisdictions. The outcomes of these legal battles remain uncertain and will likely influence the implications of Bondi's directives. But the bottom line is Pam Bondi is going on offense doing exactly what the American people gave Donald Trump a mandate to do, which was to crack down on illegal immigrants all over the country.

[Ben Ferguson]

Thank you for listening to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson. Please make sure you hit subscribe wherever you're listening to this podcast right now and for more in depth news, also subscribe to the Ben Ferguson Podcast and we will see you back here tomorrow.