Summary of "RECAP-Ten Verdict Predictions that ALL Came TRUE! (Part 1:1-5)"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson
• Host/Author: Premiere Networks
• Episode: RECAP-Ten Verdict Predictions that ALL Came TRUE! (Part 1:1-5)
• Release Date: January 3, 2025
• Description: Hosted by renowned political commentator Ben Ferguson, The 47 Morning Update delves into the latest news and political developments, with a keen focus on the President's administration and policies. This episode revisits key predictions made by the Verdict podcast that have come to fruition, showcasing the accuracy and foresight of its hosts.

Introduction

In the January 3, 2025 episode of The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson, host Ben Ferguson, alongside Senator Ted Cruz, revisits the Verdict podcast's top ten predictions made over the past year. This episode serves as a testament to the show's predictive prowess, highlighting five significant forecasts that have materialized, thereby reinforcing their credibility and challenging mainstream media narratives.

Prediction 1: Origin of COVID-19

Overview: The Verdict podcast had predicted that COVID-19 was not a naturally occurring virus but instead originated from a laboratory, specifically the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Discussion:

• Ted Cruz (00:01): Introduces the premise, emphasizing the aim to validate past predictions against current events.
• Ben Ferguson (02:06): Highlights the accuracy of their past predictions, noting the shift in mainstream narratives over time.
• Supporting Evidence:
  • Michael Knowles (04:13): Initially suggested a natural origin ("bat soup") but later acknowledged the proximity of the Wuhan lab as a suspicious factor.
  • Unnamed Medical Expert (04:29): Discusses the improbability of an organic origin and points out the coincidence of the outbreak's timing and location near the virology lab.

Notable Quotes:

• Ted Cruz (02:46): "We were right. And that was something that the media and social media said made you a conspiracy theorist."
• Ben Ferguson (03:30): "Facebook, Twitter and Google were actively suppressing the narrative that COVID was a man-made virus."

Outcome: By February 2023, significant reports, including those from the FBI and the New York Post, confirmed that COVID-19 likely originated from a lab incident at the Wuhan Institute. This vindicated the initial Verdict predictions, shifting public and governmental perspectives on the virus's origins.

Prediction 2: US Funding of Wuhan Lab

Overview: Verdict anticipated that the U.S. government had funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology, facilitating risky gain-of-function research that could have led to the pandemic.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (06:14): Explains the dual predictions regarding the virus's origin and the specific funding sources.
• Unnamed Medical Expert (08:27): Confirms that the U.S. had indeed funded the Wuhan lab, detailing the amounts and the scope of research conducted.

Notable Quotes:

• Unnamed Medical Expert (09:33): "In fiscal year 2019, the funding for the Wuhan Institute for Virology was $76,301, part of a $3.7 million program across multiple Asian countries."
• Ben Ferguson (10:46): "We were proved exactly right."

Outcome: The New York Post in June 2023 and Reuters in July 2023 reported the extent of U.S. funding to the Wuhan lab and subsequent suspension due to noncompliance, aligning with Verdict's early warnings about governmental oversight and funding practices.

Prediction 3: Joe Biden Not 2024 Democratic Nominee

Overview: The Verdict podcast forecasted that Joe Biden would not secure the Democratic nomination for the 2024 presidential election, anticipating his removal from the ballot.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (14:11): Outlines two interconnected predictions: Biden's absence from the nomination and his replacement by either Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama.
• Ben Ferguson (18:22): Reflects on the accuracy of the prediction, noting Biden's poor performance in debates and subsequent removal from the ticket on July 21, 2024.

Notable Quotes:

• Ben Ferguson (14:11): "Joe Biden would not be the 2024 Democratic nominee. He would not be on the ballot."
• Ted Cruz (20:36): "This is a prediction that you made on this show back in September of 2023 that the Democratic kingmakers could bring in Michelle Obama."

Outcome: In a dramatic turn during the Democratic primary debates, Biden was indeed removed from the nomination process, as predicted. While the initial expectation was replacement by Michelle Obama, the actual replacement was Kamala Harris, partially fulfilling the second part of the prediction.

Prediction 4: Replacement of Joe Biden by Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama

Overview: Verdict anticipated that upon Biden's removal from the Democratic ticket, he would be replaced by either Vice President Kamala Harris or former First Lady Michelle Obama.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (17:07): Discusses the strategic advantage of choosing Michelle Obama to unify the party without causing internal rivalries.
• Ben Ferguson (22:04): Acknowledges that while Michelle Obama did not take the nomination, Kamala Harris was selected instead, aligning with part of the prediction.

Notable Quotes:

• Ben Ferguson (17:08): "Michelle Obama, because she was first lady, has the ability to parachute in above all four and say, hey, we're not picking among any of you."
• Ted Cruz (22:04): "It was absolutely correct."

Outcome: Kamala Harris was chosen as Biden's replacement, partially validating the prediction. Ferguson had speculated the likelihood of Michelle Obama taking over, but the actual outcome leaned towards Harris, still within the predicted possibilities.

Prediction 5: Joe Biden to Pardon Death Row Inmates

Overview: Verdict predicted that President Biden would commute the sentences of all federal death row inmates, including high-profile terrorists responsible for heinous crimes.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (23:53): Emphasizes the moral and legal implications of commuting sentences of notorious criminals.
• Ted Cruz (26:13): Criticizes the decision to spare life even of the mastermind behind 9/11, highlighting a perceived disregard for justice.

Notable Quotes:

• Ben Ferguson (24:33): "Joe Biden intends to spare every one of them. Many of them are racist, bigoted, homicidal lunatics."
• Ted Cruz (26:13): "You won't take out the mastermind of 911 and you won't give him the death penalty."

Outcome: By August 2023, Biden had commuted the sentences of 37 out of 40 federal death row inmates, sparing those identified as particularly egregious criminals. While not entirely matching the prediction, the outcome largely aligned with the forecast, demonstrating a significant reduction in federal death sentences. The three inmates not pardoned were among the most notorious, which Ferguson initially predicted would be spared due to media manipulation.

Conclusion

In this episode of The 47 Morning Update, Ben Ferguson and Senator Ted Cruz reflect on the accuracy of Verdict's past predictions, underscoring their alignment with significant political and social developments from 2020 to 2024. From the origins of COVID-19 to critical shifts in the Democratic Party's presidential nominations and controversial decisions regarding federal death row inmates, the podcast highlights a track record of foresight that challenges prevailing mainstream narratives. These discussions not only validate the predictions but also emphasize the importance of alternative media voices in shaping and forecasting political landscapes.

Notable Takeaways:

• Accuracy of Predictions: Verdict's early stance on COVID-19's origins and subsequent revelations have bolstered its credibility.
• Political Shifts: The removal of Joe Biden from the Democratic ticket and his replacement by Kamala Harris were pivotal moments accurately anticipated by Ferguson and Cruz.
• Judicial Decisions: The commuting of death sentences, while not entirely absolute, reflects a significant policy shift in line with the podcast's forecasts.

Recommendation: For listeners seeking an alternative perspective on political developments and insightful forecasts, revisiting the earlier Verdict podcasts as referenced in this episode can provide valuable context and understanding of the unfolding political dynamics.