RECAP-Ten Verdict Predictions that ALL Came TRUE! (Part 1:1-5)

Summary

Summary of "RECAP-Ten Verdict Predictions that ALL Came TRUE! (Part 1:1-5)"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson
• Host/Author: Premiere Networks
• Episode: RECAP-Ten Verdict Predictions that ALL Came TRUE! (Part 1:1-5)
• Release Date: January 3, 2025
• Description: Hosted by renowned political commentator Ben Ferguson, The 47 Morning Update delves into the latest news and political developments, with a keen focus on the President's administration and policies. This episode revisits key predictions made by the Verdict podcast that have come to fruition, showcasing the accuracy and foresight of its hosts.

---

Introduction

In the January 3, 2025 episode of The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson, host Ben Ferguson, alongside Senator Ted Cruz, revisits the Verdict podcast's top ten predictions made over the past year. This episode serves as a testament to the show's predictive prowess, highlighting five significant forecasts that have materialized, thereby reinforcing their credibility and challenging mainstream media narratives.

---

Prediction 1: Origin of COVID-19

Overview: The Verdict podcast had predicted that COVID-19 was not a naturally occurring virus but instead originated from a laboratory, specifically the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Discussion:

• Ted Cruz (00:01): Introduces the premise, emphasizing the aim to validate past predictions against current events.
• Ben Ferguson (02:06): Highlights the accuracy of their past predictions, noting the shift in mainstream narratives over time.
• Supporting Evidence:
  • Michael Knowles (04:13): Initially suggested a natural origin ("bat soup") but later acknowledged the proximity of the Wuhan lab as a suspicious factor.
  • Unnamed Medical Expert (04:29): Discusses the improbability of an organic origin and points out the coincidence of the outbreak's timing and location near the virology lab.

Notable Quotes:

• Ted Cruz (02:46): "We were right. And that was something that the media and social media said made you a conspiracy theorist."
• Ben Ferguson (03:30): "Facebook, Twitter and Google were actively suppressing the narrative that COVID was a man-made virus."

Outcome: By February 2023, significant reports, including those from the FBI and the New York Post, confirmed that COVID-19 likely originated from a lab incident at the Wuhan Institute. This vindicated the initial Verdict predictions, shifting public and governmental perspectives on the virus's origins.

---

Prediction 2: US Funding of Wuhan Lab

Overview: Verdict anticipated that the U.S. government had funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology, facilitating risky gain-of-function research that could have led to the pandemic.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (06:14): Explains the dual predictions regarding the virus's origin and the specific funding sources.
• Unnamed Medical Expert (08:27): Confirms that the U.S. had indeed funded the Wuhan lab, detailing the amounts and the scope of research conducted.

Notable Quotes:

• Unnamed Medical Expert (09:33): "In fiscal year 2019, the funding for the Wuhan Institute for Virology was $76,301, part of a $3.7 million program across multiple Asian countries."
• Ben Ferguson (10:46): "We were proved exactly right."

Outcome: The New York Post in June 2023 and Reuters in July 2023 reported the extent of U.S. funding to the Wuhan lab and subsequent suspension due to noncompliance, aligning with Verdict's early warnings about governmental oversight and funding practices.

---

Prediction 3: Joe Biden Not 2024 Democratic Nominee

Overview: The Verdict podcast forecasted that Joe Biden would not secure the Democratic nomination for the 2024 presidential election, anticipating his removal from the ballot.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (14:11): Outlines two interconnected predictions: Biden's absence from the nomination and his replacement by either Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama.
• Ben Ferguson (18:22): Reflects on the accuracy of the prediction, noting Biden's poor performance in debates and subsequent removal from the ticket on July 21, 2024.

Notable Quotes:

• Ben Ferguson (14:11): "Joe Biden would not be the 2024 Democratic nominee. He would not be on the ballot."
• Ted Cruz (20:36): "This is a prediction that you made on this show back in September of 2023 that the Democratic kingmakers could bring in Michelle Obama."

Outcome: In a dramatic turn during the Democratic primary debates, Biden was indeed removed from the nomination process, as predicted. While the initial expectation was replacement by Michelle Obama, the actual replacement was Kamala Harris, partially fulfilling the second part of the prediction.

---

Prediction 4: Replacement of Joe Biden by Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama

Overview: Verdict anticipated that upon Biden's removal from the Democratic ticket, he would be replaced by either Vice President Kamala Harris or former First Lady Michelle Obama.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (17:07): Discusses the strategic advantage of choosing Michelle Obama to unify the party without causing internal rivalries.
• Ben Ferguson (22:04): Acknowledges that while Michelle Obama did not take the nomination, Kamala Harris was selected instead, aligning with part of the prediction.

Notable Quotes:

• Ben Ferguson (17:08): "Michelle Obama, because she was first lady, has the ability to parachute in above all four and say, hey, we're not picking among any of you."
• Ted Cruz (22:04): "It was absolutely correct."

Outcome: Kamala Harris was chosen as Biden's replacement, partially validating the prediction. Ferguson had speculated the likelihood of Michelle Obama taking over, but the actual outcome leaned towards Harris, still within the predicted possibilities.

---

Prediction 5: Joe Biden to Pardon Death Row Inmates

Overview: Verdict predicted that President Biden would commute the sentences of all federal death row inmates, including high-profile terrorists responsible for heinous crimes.

Discussion:

• Ben Ferguson (23:53): Emphasizes the moral and legal implications of commuting sentences of notorious criminals.
• Ted Cruz (26:13): Criticizes the decision to spare life even of the mastermind behind 9/11, highlighting a perceived disregard for justice.

Notable Quotes:

• Ben Ferguson (24:33): "Joe Biden intends to spare every one of them. Many of them are racist, bigoted, homicidal lunatics."
• Ted Cruz (26:13): "You won't take out the mastermind of 911 and you won't give him the death penalty."

Outcome: By August 2023, Biden had commuted the sentences of 37 out of 40 federal death row inmates, sparing those identified as particularly egregious criminals. While not entirely matching the prediction, the outcome largely aligned with the forecast, demonstrating a significant reduction in federal death sentences. The three inmates not pardoned were among the most notorious, which Ferguson initially predicted would be spared due to media manipulation.

---

Conclusion

In this episode of The 47 Morning Update, Ben Ferguson and Senator Ted Cruz reflect on the accuracy of Verdict's past predictions, underscoring their alignment with significant political and social developments from 2020 to 2024. From the origins of COVID-19 to critical shifts in the Democratic Party's presidential nominations and controversial decisions regarding federal death row inmates, the podcast highlights a track record of foresight that challenges prevailing mainstream narratives. These discussions not only validate the predictions but also emphasize the importance of alternative media voices in shaping and forecasting political landscapes.

---

Notable Takeaways:

• Accuracy of Predictions: Verdict's early stance on COVID-19's origins and subsequent revelations have bolstered its credibility.
• Political Shifts: The removal of Joe Biden from the Democratic ticket and his replacement by Kamala Harris were pivotal moments accurately anticipated by Ferguson and Cruz.
• Judicial Decisions: The commuting of death sentences, while not entirely absolute, reflects a significant policy shift in line with the podcast's forecasts.

Recommendation: For listeners seeking an alternative perspective on political developments and insightful forecasts, revisiting the earlier Verdict podcasts as referenced in this episode can provide valuable context and understanding of the unfolding political dynamics.

Transcript

[Ted Cruz]

Welcome. It is Verdict with Senator Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with you as always. And with this week being New Year's, we had had an original plan which was to give you the top 10 predictions that we made on Verdict in the last year that came true. They were big predictions and it was to set the record straight for so many on the left and the media that listened to the show of just how right we were and how ahead of things we were. And if you listen to the show, you know that we compiled this list, a list to help arm you so that you can fight back against the liberals and the narrative that they push out on so many things that they're oh so wrong on. Now with this terrible terrorist attack in New Orleans and the other terrorist attack out in Las Vegas in front of the Trump Hotel, we clearly changed things and did a special podcast that came out on Thursday with the latest news we had there. If you missed that show, go back and listen to it because there's a lot that the, that the Senator talked about, especially when it comes to the FBI and what should be happening come January 20th at the inauguration of Donald Trump and what changes we need to have immediately. Make sure you go back and listen to that special pod we did on Thursday. Now it's Friday and this was supposed to be part two of our list. What we've decided to do instead to kind of reset all this because of the terrorist attack in that special episode is we are going to give you the first part of that list again right now for you in case you missed it. And then on Monday we will have for you the second part of that list of these predictions that we made months in advance, some of them over a year in advance that became came true in 2024, heading into 2025. So with that being said, here is part one of that list of the predictions that became reality that we called here on Verdict weeks, months and even over a year ago.

[Ben Ferguson]

We're going to go through 10 predictions that on this podcast we have made that have proven correct. And the principle going forward, if you want to know what's gonna happen next, what's gonna happen in 2025, what's gonna happen in 2026? What's gonna happen going forward? Well, listen to Verdict cause we're gonna keep making predictions. And so far our batting record is pretty damn good, including some predictions that at the time we made them were widely, widely ridiculed and deemed crazy. Tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theories. And now they are indisputably correct.

[Ted Cruz]

And let's Go back and let's start with one that's way back. And now we have a lot more confirmation to say yet again, we were right. I want to go back to March 10th of 2020. March 10th, 2020. Get that in your head. We're in 2025 now, January 1st, and you said that in fact COVID 19, you believed was coming from a lab, that this wasn't some man made, this wasn't some organic thing, this was clearly man made. And if you said that, by the way, on social media, you were shut down, you were put into what we refer to as social media jail. Your reach was limited, you couldn't run ads.

[Ben Ferguson]

It changed in 2020. In 2020, Facebook and Twitter and Google, they were all actively suppressing, saying that Covid was a man made virus, that it was not something that had just naturally leapt from an animal to the human population, but rather that it escaped from a lab. It was suppressed. We now know that Facebook, that Dr. Fauci was communicating with Mark Zuckerberg, asking him to suppress it. And yet somehow, starting back in March of 2020, this show was laying out the facts. And for our loyal listeners and viewers, they were hearing the facts about COVID right at the very beginning. Give a listen. March 10, 2020.

[Michael Knowles]

This was just a bad case of bat soup that people ate something they shouldn't have eaten, and that's how it spread. Others have pointed to this strange coincidence that there is a virus testing laboratory in Wuhan. Do we have any sense of the true origins of the virus?

[Unnamed Medical Expert]

Well, we don't know for sure. I've asked medical experts and they've said based on the sequencing of the genomes, it does not appear to be artificially created, that it appears to be a virus that has occurred in nature. You're right that a lot of people have focused on the Wuhan Virology Institute that is located right there. And indeed they've got researchers there that are studying coronavirus and studying bats. I mean, that, that, that raises some obvious questions. At the same time, it's, it's very interesting. Do you remember back last fall when, when the Houston Rockets, when Darrell Morey, the general manager, tweeted out about Hong Kong, he said, stand with Hong Kong. Stand for liberty.

[Michael Knowles]

Right.

[Unnamed Medical Expert]

And, and the NBA went crazy and China went crazy and, and the NBA apologized profusely. I, I have to admit, it's kind of the same thing that anyone suggests. Well, well, gosh, you know, there are thousands, hundreds of thousands of cities all across the world. It just so happens this Outbreak is there right where this virology lab is. And the collective media acts with this outrage of. Okay, take your, take your tin hat off. How dare you even ask that question? You know, it, it, it's obviously a question that people are going to inquire. Look, the first step needs to be stopping this, this virus, stopping the disease and protecting human life right now. But, but there are certainly going to be questions following up if there is any connection or not. And that seems at least a reasonable question to ask.

[Ted Cruz]

You listen to that. And again, we're going back now till 2020 for that. You were spot on. And that was something that the media and social media said made you a conspiracy theorist.

[Ben Ferguson]

Yeah. And listen, there are two predictions that came out that we were laying out. Number one, that Covid did not occur just naturally, did not occur in a wet market from someone eating bat soup, but rather that it escaped from a lab. And number two, that in particular it came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. And look, early on, you're dealing with limited information. And I was trying to do my best to walk through that limited information. By the way, I got to say in that clip, Ben, you sound kind of funny there. You know, you don't have much of a sudden twang. You sound, you sound kind of like a yali. It's a little weird.

[Ted Cruz]

I've always, you know, wanted to know what I'd sound like if I went to the Ivy Leagues. And now I know. Compliments of Michael Knowles for making that happen. Right.

[Ben Ferguson]

And for longtime verdict listeners, Michael Knowles, my dear friend, Ben's dear friend, was, was my co host for the first couple of years. And so that was Michael and me back then, before Ben came on board. That was in March, March 10th of 2020. Let's go forward a month later to April. To April. We had a little more information. I want to listen. I want you to listen to Verdict laying out the evidence that this virus not just escaped from a lab, but escaped from the Wuhan Institute for Virology in Wuhan, China. Give a listen.

[Michael Knowles]

I want to turn for a moment from the economy into the virus itself. And I want to take just a slight victory lap because I remember on this very show, Senator, I, on March 10th, over a month ago, you suggested that there was very likely a link between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and this virus that just so coincidentally happened to occur within a couple miles of that institute during that time. The mainstream media said this was crazy, this was a conspiracy theory. There was no evidence of it. Now we are getting multiple reports all saying that the virus came to from the lab. My question here is not. My point is not just to take a victory lap. My question is, did the US Government know that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was conducting this sort of dangerous research? And if we did know, why didn't we stop it?

[Ben Ferguson]

Absolutely.

[Unnamed Medical Expert]

Yes, the U.S. government do. And, and in fact, when, when, when you and I brought this up on March 10th over a month ago, you're right. It was treated as tin. Tin foil hat, conspiracy theory, nut jobbery. Well, it turns out there was wasn't just one. There were two labs within miles of where this outbreak break occurred that were studying coronaviruses from bats. And, and that there were internal State Department wires before this pandemic, raising concerns about the security in those labs and that an accidental virus could escape and cause a global pandemic. But I'll tell you it's worse than that. And let me give you some, some breaking news right now, which is the US Government was funding the Chinese research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Your taxpayer dollars and my taxpayer dollars. And let me give you specifics that we just got today. Today, an inquiry of the National Institutes of Health. Did any of your money go to the Wuhan Institute of Virology?

[Ben Ferguson]

The answer is yes.

[Unnamed Medical Expert]

And, and, and here's what, here's what they told us in writing today. They said in fiscal year 2019, the funding for the Wuhan Institute for Virology was $76,000. And this and the $301. $76,301.

[Ben Ferguson]

Now what did it go to?

[Unnamed Medical Expert]

And I'm, I'm repeating what NIH has told me in writing. It went to, it was part of an overall $3.7 million funding program that went to six years in sites in China, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Laos, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and Myanmar. And here's what they were studying. These are NIH's words. The project included studying viral diversity in animal parentheses bats, reservoirs, surveying people that live in high risk communities for evidence of bat coronavirus infection and conducting laboratory experiments to analyze and predict which newly discovered viruses pose the greatest threats to human health Center.

[Ted Cruz]

It's pretty clear. And that's part two of this prediction. You were right as well.

[Ben Ferguson]

Yeah. Look. And we now know this like what we were predicting then. That was crazy. Fringe theory has now all been confirmed. Let's Fast forward to February 2023. February 2023 the Washington Post reported FBI director said COVID 19 quote most likely originated from lab incident. That's the FBI's position now. June of 2023 the New York report reported. New York Post reported, quote, U.S. taxpayers supported research in three Chinese labs that included risky gain of function experiments with coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the National Institute of Health, nih and the U.S. agency for International Development. USAID provided $2,168,345 in grant funding to the Chinese research institutions between 2014 and 2021, according to the Government Accountability Office. The report shows $1,413,720 in sub grants allocated by the Manhattan based Eco Health alliance went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology where hazardous research was conducted on bat coronaviruses. July of 2023 Reuters reported. Quote, US suspends federal funding to Wuhan lab over noncompliance December 2024 Fox News Covid most likely leaked from Wuhan Lab Social distancing not based on Science Select Committee finds And then finally December 26th of 2024, just a few days ago the Wall Street Journal wrote the bombshell story that we did an entire podcast on entitled Behind Closed Doors. The Spy World scientist who argued Covid was a lab leak. Well, there were scientists arguing that behind closed doors, but there was also the verdict podcast making the argument, laying out the facts right at the very beginning. And I got to say on Covid we were proved exactly right.

[Ted Cruz]

Final question on this prediction. Looking forward, do you think we're going to learn a lot more about Foushee, the COVID up and Covid when Donald Trump is inaugurated after January 20th?

[Ben Ferguson]

So I do. And I am urging the incoming Trump administration to engage in full transparency. That's a discussion I have had with Pam Bondi at the Department of Justice. That's a discussion I've had with with Kash Patel who will be going to the FBI. It's a discussion I will have next week with RFK Jr. Who will be coming in as HHS secretary. Every one of them I am urging use full transparency, make it public, let the public know. And I'm going to keep pressing them to do that and I think they're going to follow through. We're going to know a lot more. That is a very good thing.

[Ted Cruz]

Let's move on to another prediction. This may be one of the my favorite predictions that we've ever made here on this show because when we said it we got a lot of pushback and there were a lot of people that said what you were saying was just absurd. We had our tin foil hats on again. I mean, there were people that were angry over this. And that was the big prediction that you made, that Joe Biden would not be the 2024 Democratic nominee.

[Ben Ferguson]

Well, that's right. And I made two related predictions. Number one, early on I said, I believe Joe Biden would not be the Democrat nominee. He would not be on the ballot in 2024. I also predicted, I said the only people that were. When people were later talking about replacing him with Gavin Newsom or Gretchen Whitmer or some other people, I said, no, that will never happen. The Democrat Party is a bean counting party. Next in line is Kamala Harris. And the Democrat party cannot, cannot, cannot push her aside, cannot push an African American woman aside for a white guy like Gavin Newsom. Their party would spontaneously combust if they tried to do that. So I said, the only people who could replace Joe Biden, our Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama. And I did lay out that I thought Michelle Obama. If I were a Democrat, I would much prefer Michelle Obama to Kamala Harris because Kamala Harris, as the whole world has seen, is a lousy candidate. So if you're a Democrat who wants to win and you're stuck with Kamala Harris, there's only one human being who can push Kamala, Kamala Harris aside. That is Michelle Obama. Now, what I think happened, I think they tried with Michelle. I think Michelle said no. And so prediction number one, that Joe Biden would not be the nominee that came 100% correct. Prediction number two, that he would be replaced either by Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama. That came came true as well. Although I did think Michelle Obama had a very real possibility. So let's listen this, this first Excerpt is from September 18, 2023. So more than a year, a year and three months ago, where I laid out, laid out this possibility and give a listen. So here's the scenario that I think is perhaps most likely and most dangerous. In August of 2024, the Democrat kingmakers jettison Joe Biden and parachute in Michelle Obama. And I want you to pause and reflect on that.

[Ted Cruz]

So I'm pausing and I'm reflecting, as we said. And so is everybody else listening right now?

[Ben Ferguson]

I view this as a very serious danger.

[Ted Cruz]

I'm smiling right now because it terrifies me. And I also could totally see this happening.

[Ben Ferguson]

So Michelle Obama, number one, you don't infuriate African American women, which is a critical part of the constituency that Democrats are relying on to win. But number two, you avoid the problem if you pick from Any of the four. The other three are pissed because they're all, to some extent, peers, they're rivals. They're all jabbing knives at each other. Michelle Obama, because she was first lady, has the ability to kind of parachute in above all four and say, hey, we're not picking among any of you. You guys can all fight it out next time. You're all going to be on the same level.

[Unnamed Medical Expert]

We're coming.

[Ben Ferguson]

This is the Obama saving the day. And I think in terms of a solution that unifies Democrats, there ain't nothing like that. I also think Michelle is not all that eager to run for president, but.

[Unnamed Medical Expert]

To parachute in In August of 24.

[Ben Ferguson]

A couple of months before the presidency, and suddenly wake up and be president.

[Ted Cruz]

Not a bad gig. Not a bad gig.

[Ben Ferguson]

It's not a bad gig at all. Now, would she do it? I don't know. I've met Michelle, but I don't know her personally in any meaningful way. I don't know if she would do it. I do think Barack Obama is already running the Biden administration. I think he is already the puppet master behind this Biden White House. I don't think Joe Biden is the decision maker. And so when I see the media turning on Joe Biden right now, I think the odds of Michelle Obama parachuting in, in August of 2024 have risen dramatically. And that ought to scare the hell out of anyone who is unhappy about the direction this country is going and doesn't want us to go even crazier. In an even worse direction.

[Ted Cruz]

In an even worse direction.

[Ben Ferguson]

Well, and there you heard in September of 2023, making the prediction that Joe Biden would be jettisoned. And by the way, at the time that happened, very few people were making that prediction. When we put that podcast out, it drove a lot of news. There were headlines, there were people that were shocked when I laid out that Biden was not capable, that his mental capacity had diminished, that he was not going to be the nominee, that the Democrats realized it, that they were going to jettison him. The media ridiculed it. You go forward to February of 2024, I went on Maria Bartiromo, I said, I think Obama's driving the train, which is also what I said. Back in September 2023, John Harwood, who, you know, was the former journalist for the Wall Street Journal and for NBC and who's a hard leftist, a vicious leftist, he retweeted my comments on Maria Bartiromo and his entire commentary was, quote, impossibly stupid conversation. So that was his learned journalistic view, is that it was impossibly stupid to say that. Um, I will tell you, just, just in November of this year, I retweeted Harwood shot, shot at me and I just said, want to know why? Nobody trusts the media. Just nine months ago, a fake, quote, journalist claimed it was, quote, impossibly stupid to observe that Joe Biden was not mentally competent to be president. Now everybody admits it. What say you, John J. Harwood? Of course, Harwood didn't respond at all. He ignored it. All right, let's go forward though. Um, not only did we lay it out in September of 2023, but then fast forward to the debate, the debate between Joe Biden and, and Donald, Donald Trump. That was on June 28, 2024. You and I recorded a verdict podcast immediately after the debate. We, we, we went live recorded it that night and give a listen to what the verdict podcast said the night of the debate.

[Ted Cruz]

Senator Cruz, I didn't think it could actually be this bad. It was worse than even I think either of us could have imagined. And now the Democratic Party is screaming, replace the president.

[Ben Ferguson]

Well, you and I are sitting here. It is 10:17pm Texas time. It is 11:17pm East coast time. The night of the debate. The debate just ended. And I have to say we have just witnessed what I believe is the most consequential presidential debate in U.S. history. Sometimes debate change. Debates change things, sometimes they don't, I believe to bite tonight's debate change things fundamentally. And I believe the odds have now skyrocketed. I believe the odds are north of 80% that the Democrat Party will remove Joe Biden from the ticket and replace him. And I believe they are likely to replace Joe Biden with Michelle Obama because Biden did so disastrously badly tonight that Democrats across the country are in utter freefall and complete panic. We're going to break all that down tonight.

[Ted Cruz]

Yeah. And by the way, this was a prediction that you made on this show back in September of 2023 that the Democratic kingmakers could bring in Michelle Obama will break all that down center. Yet another prediction there. Again, you go back and look at the night you made it right at that debate and you said there's no way he's going to be on the ticket. And it was absolutely correct.

[Ben Ferguson]

Well, to be fair, what I said was the odds were north of 80% that he would be pulled off the ticket. That prediction that Joe Biden would be removed from the ticket, which by the way, is unprecedented and was almost universally ridiculed in the media, that prediction came 100% true. I also articulated there were only two people who could replace him, Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama. I believe Michelle Obama was more likely. The Michelle Obama thing did not come to pass, but the Kamala Harris thing did. And in fact, I predicted that the Democrat kingmakers would jettison Biden in August of 2024. They in fact did so on July 21st of 2024. So I was 10 days off in terms of predicting it. And by the way, to be clear, I predicted that way back in September of 2023. So. So over a year earlier, I predicted within 10 days when they would throw Biden off the ballot. And, and I'm going to make actually a brand new prediction here. I'm going to predict that in the next year or two we are going to get confirmation that there was serious outreach to Michelle Obama to see if she was willing to replace Joe Biden on the ballot and that Michelle Obama said no. I don't know that, but my instinct, my judgment tells me that happened. And we'll see in the next year or two. If that gets confirmed, we'll have a subsequent podcast. If that gets confirmed publicly, we'll go back and revisit it. Regardless, prediction number three, Joe Biden will not be the nominee. Check true. Prediction number four, Joe Biden will be replaced by either Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama. Check true. So that's four predictions. Let's move on to prediction number five.

[Ted Cruz]

Number five is another big one here. And that is the prediction that Joe Biden would pardon death row inmates. You said that it was going to happen and it did. Plus the even more I would say disgusting deal that was given out to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 911 to spare his life. The mastermind of 911 and a man that was also before even 9 11, involved in many other terrorist attack that killed women and children and the elderly, innocent bystanders that he did around the world.

[Ben Ferguson]

Well, and this is a prediction that we made on August 18, 2023. Give a listen to what we said back in August of 23. I'm going to make a prediction as well, which is that these are not the only mass murderers that I think this administration is going to refuse to follow federal law and impose the death pen. I'm going to make a prediction right now which is Joe Biden, before he leaves the White House, will commute the sentence of every federal prisoner on death row, that he will do it for every one of them. And that includes, it includes the white supremacist and Nazi who murdered nine African Americans at the Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, in a horrific hate crime. He's on federal death row. It includes the Boston bomber, who murdered innocent people by exploding a bomb at the Boston Marathon. One of the two brothers is still alive. He's on death row. And my prediction right now is Joe Biden intends to spare every one of these mass murderers, every one of them. Many of them are racist, bigoted, homicidal lunatics. And I think we're going to see him commute all of their sentences before he leaves the White House.

[Ted Cruz]

Well, if you won't take out the mastermind of 911 and you won't give him the death penalty, is there anyone that you'll give it to? I mean, it doesn't get any worse than this. It doesn't. And yet that's exactly what he's done.

[Ben Ferguson]

Well, so my prediction again in August of 23 is that he would remove the death penalty, that he would commute the death penalty for the federal death row prisoners. That has come to pass. Now, to be clear, this prediction proves slightly off. I predicted that he would commute the sentence of every single federal death row prisoner. He instead commuted the sentence of 37 out of the 40 federal death row inmates. And so there were three he did not. And interestingly enough, the three he did not are the three that I identified in October, or rather in August of 2023. So the three he did not were the murderer at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, the murderer at the Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston, South Carolina, and the Boston Marathon bomber. And those three are the only three he did not. Now, I identified those three because they're the most horribly egregious. They're the most famous and infamous. They are. Two of the three, at least, are vicious, unrepentant racists. And so I have to say, my prediction, it was not 100% right. It was 92.5% right. Because instead of commuting 40 death sentences, Biden commuted 37 out of 40, and he left the three most egregious and famous ones off the table. Why? Because they knew that the press was so utterly corrupt that without those three that they would get almost no criticism for it, that you would just go under the carpet, not really be seen. And I have to say I underestimated the incredible cynicism. And I gotta say, nonetheless, that is a profound disrespect for the rule of law among those that Biden did commute the sentences was a Nazi and an Aryan Brotherhood racist. You know, Joe Biden stepped forward and said, hey, we're the Democrat Party. We're here for Nazis and Klansmen. I mean it. But 92.5% prediction correct. And sadly another element of this prediction just became confirmed moments ago. So this episode we were talking about the plans to spare the life of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 911 and this podcast put enormous public pressure on the White House. The White House, Karine Jean Pierre was asked about it and the heat became so much that they backed off of it. Well, sadly the news just broke that they're going back to trying to spare Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. They're trying to do it literally on the way out the door. And the contempt that Joe Biden, this entire White House has for the voters, they are trying to break everything on the way out the door. They're trying to frustrate Donald Trump every way they can. They are such vicious partisans that there is no, no respect for the Constitution, for the rule of law, no respect for the voters. They don't care what the voters said in November. They are trying to literally break everything on the way out the door. And I gotta say, it is grotesque.

[Ted Cruz]

It really is. We're gonna have part two of our predictions. We will continue this on Friday morning. So may make sure you hit that like subscribe auto download button and we will keep giving you hard hitting predictions so you know what's actually going to be happening in this new year. It is going to be a very fun one especially with Trump in office, Republicans control of the House and the Senate and we're going to have a lot of predictions for you. So make sure you hit that subscriber auto download button. And on Friday we'll have part two of this. Also don't forget grab my podcast, the Ben Ferguson podcast on those in between days and I'll keep you updated on the latest breaking news as well. And we'll see you back here Friday morning.