What if the way we grade students is not actually measuring what they know?

In this episode, we take a deep look at traditional grading practices and ask hard but necessary questions about equity, accuracy, and student learning.

From the 0–100 grading scale and how a single zero can distort achievement, to late penalties, extra credit, and assignments that don’t always reflect mastery, we explore how grades can sometimes measure compliance more than understanding.

I also share a personal experience as a parent that challenged my perspective on grading and learning, along with reflections on how we support students who are struggling, and those who may be passing without being fully prepared for what comes next.

We also talk about:

Why behavior and academic achievement should be separated
The problem with averaging scores over time
Why re-teaching and reassessing matters for true mastery
And how instructional decisions should be driven by data, not just grades in a gradebook

This is a conversation for educators, parents, and anyone who cares about student success beyond the report card.

Are our grading practices telling the truth about learning or are they gatekeeping opportunity?

Let’s talk about it.

Connect With Me

To submit a question or join my mailing list, use the information below.

Facebook Group: TheAdvocate
Instagram: @TheAdvocateDr.Love
Email: Dr.Love.TheAdvocate@gmail.com