The AIAC Podcast: "Corruption Kills?" – Detailed Episode Summary
Episode: Corruption kills?
Podcast: The AIAC Podcast (Africa Is a Country)
Host: Will Shoki
Guests: Sa’eed Husseini, Oag, Emeka
Date: June 5, 2024
Overview
This episode delves into the complexities of corruption and anti-corruption movements in Nigeria, a country widely associated with the issue. While acknowledging Nigeria's persistent corruption problems, the discussion focuses on the often-overlooked history and dynamics of its anti-corruption efforts—questioning what these have achieved, their limitations, and whether anti-corruption can serve as a genuine progressive force for the left both in Nigeria and other contexts.
The conversation, rich with personal insights and critical analysis, interrogates the relationship between corruption, class power, external demands (especially from international financial institutions), and the real prospects for meaningful change.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Corruption and Its Counterpart: Anti-Corruption in Nigeria
-
[01:55] Framing the Conversation
- The panel reflects on why corruption is a recurring theme and notes that anti-corruption—the other side of the coin—has been neglected.
- There’s an ongoing debate globally and on the African left about whether anti-corruption can be a progressive mobilizing force.
-
[04:31] Motivation & Scope
- Emeka sees anti-corruption discussion as a way to assess what concrete measures (e.g., EFCC, ICPC) have been implemented, beyond just “lip service” or anti-corruption as a mere extension of anti-politics.
-
[07:38] Critical Materialist View
- Oag underscores the need to approach anti-corruption as materialists: “...not just looking at the lip service but examining how, in a class society, elites pay lip service to anti-corruption but rarely challenge their own interests.” [07:38]
2. A Brief History of Anti-Corruption Before the Fourth Republic
- [10:19] Pre-1999: Military Dictatorships & Whimsical Crackdowns
-
Emeka explains that before democratic reform, anti-corruption was the tool of military regimes, resulting in arbitrary arrests and sackings, but rarely institutional, thorough investigations with real due process.
- Memorable example: “It was basically now who intoxicated, corrupt, nine incorrupt people randomly ... done outside of the democratic norm.” [10:19]
-
Oag adds that some military leaders, like Muritala Mohammed, aggressively pursued anti-corruption campaigns, often resulting in mass retirements or sackings. Yet, these were mainly top-down, not institutional changes. [13:19]
-
Will emphasizes a recurring cycle: public anger grows post-boom (like after the oil boom), fueling desires for “cleansing” but seldom resulting in systematic reform or institution-building. [13:34]
-
3. Birth of Contemporary Institutions: EFCC & ICPC
-
[17:21] Return to Democracy & External Influences
- Return to civilian rule in 1999 (the Fourth Republic) saw the establishment of key anti-corruption bodies: EFCC (Economic and Financial Crimes Commission) and ICPC (Independent Corrupt Practices Commission).
- Emeka traces this institutionalization to pressure from international institutions (IMF, World Bank) demanding these frameworks as preconditions for debt relief and financial engagement:
- “...the act was just passed, but ... not a lot of money that was pumped into it.” [22:49]
- “This prescription by the same international bodies became that part of the reason why this hasn’t worked was because the African elite... were irredeemably corrupt.” [18:30]
-
[24:35] Worldview of Corruption
- Will and Oag discuss how global financial institutions reframed the development crisis as a corruption problem rather than a structural or class problem, deflecting blame onto African governments while perpetuating capital-friendly reforms.
4. Assessing Present-Day Anti-Corruption Agencies
-
[30:14] Effectiveness and Political Manipulation
- Emeka gives a nuanced view: EFCC and ICPC may have had technical improvements (better intelligence, increased case record, tools like BVN for bank tracking), but still face chronic underfunding and political interference.
- Most high-level cases stall or end in plea bargains with minimal restitution, while the agencies more rapidly pursue “small fry”—the infamous “Yahoo boys” internet scammers.
- “So if you’re going to assess them ... they’re getting these raids in. They are confiscating funds ... a large chunk of which they are now being accused of pocketing.” [35:33]
- Oag is sharper: These institutions are little more than “tools for the elites to resolve their internal dealings and just pay lip service to fighting corruption.” [36:45]
- “You steal as much as you can so when the EFCC gets you, you can do the play-bargain thing and keep like 80% of what you stole and ... air-conditioned house arrest bullshit...” [39:22]
-
[40:16] Cycles of Populism and Technocracy
- Will traces how cycles of technocratic anti-corruption (Obasanjo era) and populist anti-corruption (Buhari—ex-military, now civilian president) have both failed due to structural limitations, entrenched inequality, executive interference, and lack of redistribution.
-
[44:54] Incremental Changes & Systemic Limits
- Emeka concedes technical improvements, such as the BVN and Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), give the EFCC more capacity. But these are easily sidelined by executive interference (“one phone call can shut it all down”), highlighting the futility without systemic reform.
- “If president can make a phone call and be like drop this case ... then why does it matter if these people suddenly learned how to use this new fancy software?” [53:23]
- Emeka concedes technical improvements, such as the BVN and Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU), give the EFCC more capacity. But these are easily sidelined by executive interference (“one phone call can shut it all down”), highlighting the futility without systemic reform.
5. Corruption, Development, and Moralism: Can Corruption Be Productive?
-
[56:12] Is Corruption Always an Obstacle?
-
The hosts explore whether corruption itself is always an impediment to development. Emeka and Will point out historical examples (e.g., the US, China) where corruption was part of state-building or economic growth.
- “There are ways to institutionalize corruption, and ... cash in on its redistributive power ... In Nigeria, you can’t go after government contracts and not be willing to kick back 10%.” [57:45]
- But such models depend on redistribution and delivery; in Nigeria, the lack of this has entrenched stagnation.
-
Oag strongly disagrees with institutionalizing any level of corruption, arguing even "tolerable" amounts inevitably expand and undermine state capacity:
- “A zero tolerance level should be adopted ... if you say you should entertain some level, what is to stop person ... from 15, waiting stop from 20? Capital go always they increase ego.” [65:06]
-
-
[68:38] Homegrown Dynamics
- Emeka describes how anti-corruption drives forced illicit money (that previously went offshore) into the domestic real estate sector, leading to new bubbles and distortions, rather than real redistribution or productive investment.
6. Anti-Corruption and Left Politics: What Should the Left Do?
- [72:04] Can the Left Claim Anti-Corruption?
-
Facing public apathy and cynicism (“anti-corruption as itself a corrupt practice”), the group wrestles with whether the left should embrace, repurpose, or move past anti-corruption rhetoric.
-
Oag advocates for principle: the left must educate, build from what exists, but “add new meaning” and maintain a clear political project to regain trust:
- “We are supposed to now come and add new meaning to that and new, new material meaning and … cultural meaning ... fidelity to what we’ve said we’re going to do when we get there.” [75:52]
-
Emeka is more pragmatic and even pessimistic:
- “A large number of Nigerians aren’t averse to corruption ... Whenever there’s a corruption allegation, conversation usually delves into ‘he’s a thief, but he’s my own thief’ ... The society that I have engaged with tells me that.” [77:59]
- He sees anti-corruption as ineffective for mass mobilization and believes the left must “wiggle round” corruption for power—make compromises as necessary, and only then attempt deeper reforms.
-
Will sums up the tension: Liberal and conservative anti-corruption is “zero tolerance in theory and partial tolerance in practice.” The left must offer something different—though there is no easy formula.
-
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments (with Timestamps)
-
On Military Anti-Corruption:
- “It was basically now who intoxicated, corrupt, nine incorrupt people randomly ... done outside the democratic norm.” — Emeka [10:19]
-
On International Pressure:
- “...part of the reason why this hasn’t worked was because the African elite ... were irredeemably corrupt. And there was a need to check that.” — Emeka [18:30]
-
On Anti-Corruption’s Dual Purpose:
- “These institutions are little more than tools for the elites to resolve their internal dealings and just pay lip service to fighting corruption.” — Oag [36:45]
-
On Plea Bargains for Elites:
- “You steal as much as you can so when the EFCC gets you, you can do the play-bargain thing and keep like 80% of what you stole and ... air-conditioned house arrest bullshit...” — Oag [39:22]
-
On Systemic Inertia:
- “If president can make a phone call and be like drop this case ... then why does it matter if these people suddenly learned how to use this new fancy software?” — Will [53:23]
-
On Everyday Corruption:
- “There are ways to institutionalize corruption, and ... cash in on its redistributive power ... In Nigeria, you can’t go after government contracts and not be willing to kick back 10%.” — Emeka [57:45]
-
On the Dangers of Moralism:
- “I’m not a big fan of this anti-corruption in the moralistic sense ... we need to understand what is systemic corruption and what’s corruption ... that has some redistributive tendencies.” — Emeka [61:16]
-
On Public Cynicism:
- “People see anti-corruption as itself a corrupt practice, especially when some of these institutions cannot account for the funds that they seized.” — Will [73:33]
-
On Left Strategy:
- “We are supposed to now come and add new meaning to that and new material meaning ... fidelity to what we’ve said we’re going to do when we get there ...” — Oag [75:52]
- “Your job as a politician is to shape society ... But you’re not going to shape society outside of power. You need power to shape society.” — Emeka [84:26]
Timestamps for Major Segments
- 00:17–01:51 — Introduction, framing, and host/guest intros
- 01:55–10:19 — Why Anti-Corruption?; historic role in Nigeria
- 10:19–17:21 — Anti-corruption pre-Fourth Republic (military era)
- 17:21–24:35 — Fourth Republic, creation of EFCC & ICPC, international role
- 24:35–30:14 — IMF/World Bank agenda & changing rhetoric
- 30:14–44:54 — Effectiveness & limits of present-day agencies
- 44:54–56:12 — Technical progress vs. systemic limits, role of political will
- 56:12–72:04 — Corruption, moralism, pragmatism, and types of corruption
- 72:04–88:51 — Anti-corruption as left agenda; strategy, realism, cynicism
- 88:51–end — Closing remarks and lighter banter
Conclusion
This episode offers a layered exploration of the paradoxes of fighting corruption in Nigeria: the way anti-corruption is weaponized politically, the impact of global economic pressures, the systemic roots of corruption in class and inequality, and the challenges—moral, practical, and rhetorical—facing genuine progressive change. The panel ultimately leaves open the question of whether anti-corruption can be a rallying cry for the left or if a different approach is necessary, revealing both the urgency and complexity of the issue for Nigeria and beyond.