Loading summary
A
Ever wondered why the Romans were defeated in the Teutoburg Forest? What secrets lie buried in prehistoric Ireland? Or what made Alexander truly great? With a subscription to History Hit, you can explore our ancient past alongside the world's leading historians and archaeologists. You'll also unlock hundreds of hours of original documentaries with a brand new release every single week covering everything from the ancient world to World War II. Just visit historyhit.com subscribe.
B
Acast Powers the World's Best Podcasts Here's a show that we recommend.
A
Do you like being educated on things that entertain but don't matter?
B
Well, then you need to be listening
A
to the Podcast with Knox and Jamie Every Wednesday we put together an episode dedicated to delightful idiocy to give your brain a break from all the serious and important stuff. Whether we're deep diving a classic movie,
B
dissecting the true meanings behind the newest slang, or dunking on our own listeners
A
for their bad takes or cringy stories,
B
we always approach our topics with humor and just a little bit of side eye. And we end every episode with recommendations on all the best new movies, books, TV shows or music.
A
To find out more, just search up the Podcast with Knox and Jamie wherever
B
you listen to podcasts and prepare to make Wednesday your new favorite day of the week. Acast helps creators launch, grow and monetize
A
their podcast everywhere acast.com Most people don't realize how much of their personal information is being bought and sold every day. Data brokers are making billions, pulling details about you from public records and the Internet, then packaging and selling it, usually without your consent. That's how your information lands in the hands of scammers, spammers, even stalkers. It's why you get endless robocalls and why ads seem to follow you everywhere. That's where Aura comes in. Aura actively removes your data from broker sites and keeps it off. They also instantly alert you if your information shows up in a breach or on the dark web. But Aura goes beyond data protection. With one app you get a vpn, antivirus, password manager, spam, call protection, Dark web monitoring, and even up to $5 million in identity theft insurance, all backed by 24. 7 US based fraud support. Other companies might sell just credit monitoring or just a vpn. Aura gives you all of it together at the same price competitors charge for just one service. Start your free trial today at aura.com safety. Protect yourself now at aura.com safety. Did you know that in 1485 the Tudor dynasty began right in the heart of Leicester? If you love the drama of the wars of the Roses. Join me, Matt Lewis, for a new walking audio tour. From history hit, we'll trace the final days of the Plantagenet era following Richard III from his last restless night in the city to the very spot where the Tudor age began.
B
All you need is your smartphone and
A
the voice map app. It uses your location to trigger the story automatically, so you can keep your phone in your pocket and your eyes on the history. Download VoiceMap from your app store or go to VoiceMap me historyhit. That's VoiceMap me historyhit. For a long time, Iron Age Britain has been misunderstood in the past. This centuries long period of British prehistory, just before the Roman conquest, has been portrayed as a shadowy world dominated by warriors in blue paint. A land of so called barbarians living rudimentary lives on the edge of the known world. But we now know that that's not quite right. Across Britain, objects have been pulled from rivers and earth that tell a different story. Objects so intricate and so deliberate, crafted by highly sophisticated pre Roman societies, each with their own traditions, their own beliefs. It is archaeology that has started to shine an incredible light on who these Iron Age Britons actually were and how they lived. New discoveries are being unearthed and revealed to the world. For the first time in more than 2,000 years, we are in a golden age for Iron Age archaeology. It is archaeology that is revealing a world of striking elites, both men and women, of complex settlements, beautiful metalwork, long distance trade, and of profound beliefs that shaped entire landscapes. It's this archaeology that we're going to delve into today. Welcome to the Ancients. I'm Tristan Hughes, your host and this is an introduction to the exciting, yet still very mysterious world of Iron Age Britain. Our guest is Durham University's Professor Tom Moore, one of the leading experts on Iron Age Britain. Tom, it is such a pleasure to have you on the podcast.
B
Lovely to see you again, Tristan.
A
It's been too long since we last chatted. We chatted all things. That amazing discovery, the Mels and bee hoard, which I gather is going on display very, very soon.
B
Yep. There's going to be the first exhibition in Yorkshire Museum on the 15th of May. So excited to kind of see that, the public's reaction to it and so
A
people understand the Mels and be hoard. We did a whole film on it with you and other key people involved in the project. But this is one of the largest, the most significant Iron Age discoveries in the north of England in recent years.
B
Yeah, I mean one of the largest discoveries for the Iron Age in the whole of Britain. I would say probably the largest horde of Iron Age metalwork ever encountered in a huge number of artifacts. Particularly really exciting bits of vehicles, chariots, but also possibly wagons, which we haven't seen before, which sounds a bit nerdy, but it's really interesting for Iron Age specialists because we've never seen four wheeled wagons in Britain before. So very exciting.
A
Well, nerdy is what we want, the ancient. So don't you worry, we're going to be doing much more of that nitty gritty detail on Iron Age Britain. But of course, Iron Age Britain, it's a large topic, so we're going to hop from topic to topic within Iron Age Britain during our chat and seeing how much we can get through. But first off, with the background, when someone says Iron Age Britain today, how large a period of time are we talking about?
B
So the Iron Age starts around about 800 BC, you know, depends when you define the Iron Age all the way through to the Roman conquest, really. So AD43 in the southeast of England, obviously, slightly later in northern England, and then parts of Scotland are never conquered by Rome. That's a little bit of an artificial cutoff for the end of it because, of course, you know, that's just the conquest. But actually much of Iron Age life in many parts of Britain carries on for a long period into the Roman period. But that's what we define as the Iron Age.
A
It's a huge period, isn't it? It's like from today all the way back to the time of the Crusade. When talking about Iron Age Britain, I guess we're going to need to get our head around straight away that there's a lot of development, a lot of evolution that you can see in these societies over that period.
B
Definitely. And in the past, sometimes we've kind of tended to kind of think of Iron Age life and society and settlement as all being one thing. But like you say, there's a huge change between the end of the Bronze Age, the late Bronze Age, all the way through to the Roman period. And also, it's worth remembering, there's a huge diversity just in Britain in terms of the way people lived, the societies they lived in, the settlements lived in. So sometimes it's quite hard to kind of just generalize and say this is what the Iron Age was like.
A
There used to be a tendency to think with the coming of Rome, that was the coming of civilization as it was, and what was in Britain before it was mysterious, but it was the land of backward barbarians almost.
B
Yeah, definitely. That was the kind of the. The old way of looking at it. I mean, much of what was happening in the late Iron Age was a precursor to what happened in the Roman Empire. I mean, if we think about how farming was in the late Iron Age, most of those developments had already happened under Iron Age societies. It wasn't. Rome brought innovations of urbanism, for instance, but much of the rest of society was already highly developed and complex before Rome ever turned up.
A
And this is where archaeology really shines a light on Iron Age Britain unlike anything else.
B
Yes, because, of course, you've got to remember that Iron Age societies didn't leave any written records. Interestingly, some of them in the very late Iron Age could probably read and write Latin, but there's very few people and the only written evidence we have is a few sources from Greek and Roman writers, which suffer from their own problems of propaganda and so on. So it's only archaeology that can really tell us about Iron Age societies.
A
What I have here, I wanted to bring this because it was discovered deep in an attic quite recently, but it's a history book from, I think it's the 1850s or 1840s, so it's quite an artifact in itself. But it has, like, the first page kind of gives you an insight into how they viewed the Iron Age back then and how different we can. And we can, like, dissect it all and going through the archeology today. But it's interesting how it. Like this book, no. 4 Kids, more than 150 years ago. It starts basically with the Romans and a quick explanation of what was there before, what they thought. And so it starts. It talks about Caesar's arrival in Britain and talks about the people of Britain. Its inhabitants, who were then thinly scattered over the island, were not civilized at all. They resembled barbarians, barbarous tribes. In old tombs or fields of battle, specimens of their arms and tools are still dug up. These consist of spear and arrowheads, hatchets and knives ingeniously made of flint. They were not acquainted with the use of lime in building, but lived mostly in subterranean dwellings covered with large slabs of stone with the same rude material. They erected many remarkable monuments which astonish and confuse the modern architects. Such are the Druidic circles of Stonehenge and other places, consisting of huge upright masses of rock surmounted by transverse blocks of immense size. And it kind of goes on and on. It's like the soil was poorly cultivated and many districts, which are now fruitful cornfields, were then barren wastes or impassable morasses. It would seem at the present day, but a poor boast for a powerful and uncivilized empire like Rome to gain victories over such tribes. Immediate thoughts on that, Tom?
B
Yes, well, obviously archaeology has changed. I mean, when you look at something like that, obviously it's written in a time before archaeology was really a full discipline and really understood that. So you could see from that little quote you read there that there's a sort of conflation of flints and Neolithic and with the Iron Age. So they're not really. They haven't got that understanding of deep time that we now understand in the Iron Age. And of course, when we think about the sources they were using, like Julius Caesar's account of the conquest or his invasions of Britain, you know, that's what they're using to understand periods like the Iron Age archaeology now in the, you know, since throughout the 20th century. And now it allows us to have a much better understanding of those societies,
A
better understanding, better dating, more insights into how they lived still, presumably, many mysteries still abound, but we are learning through new discoveries in the north and south of Britain more about how they lived and. Yeah, how sophisticated they were, how they communicated, exchanged with each other and so much more.
B
Yeah, I mean, it's a really exciting time for Iron Age studies, as you say. I mean, you know, they're exciting discoveries, not least Malsonby, but also huge advances in scientific analysis. So ancient DNA studies telling us about relationships between people, perhaps where they came from, isotope studies also telling us about diet and also perhaps the origins of individuals. And I have to say, and it sort of perhaps doesn't grab the headlines so much, but also what we would call developer led archaeology. So, you know, most people perhaps don't realize that over 90% of archeology in Britain happens before development, before road schemes and building, and that's constantly providing new Iron Age settlements so that we can chart the kind of houses they live in, the settlements they live in, and even perhaps the increase in numbers of settlements over time. So it's a really exciting time to be able to bring all that together to try and sort of understand Iron Age societies as a whole.
A
So we'll get to these settlements very quickly. Keywords like roundhouses, hill forts and so on. But first of all, the arrival of the Iron Age in Britain, what should we be thinking?
B
So in terms of people think of the Iron Age and we think of iron obviously as being defining that in many ways, iron doesn't necessarily define the Iron Age. The late Bronze Age ends with the kind of people might know that in the Bronze Age, and particularly the late Bronze Age, there's large hoarding of bronze objects and then depositing them in wet places or in hoards on land. And that ceases around 800-700-BC, which is kind of the end of the Bronze Age. But iron technology doesn't come in straight away. In fact, iron technology is actually. There's some evidence that it's been around for a few hundred years before the end of the Bronze Age, confusingly.
A
So there is iron technology in the Bronze Age?
B
Okay, yes, oddly, but yes, or at least hints at it. So there's a site in Berkshire which has smithing. So that's when you're smithing objects, so you're not actually smelting the ore that dates from about 900 BC. So very early, when we're firmly in the Bronze Age, iron technology, then smelting, so that's actually taking the ore, doesn't happen until about maybe 800, 700 BC. But actually the iron technology, when we get it, for example, traded ingots, for instance, doesn't really happen till about 400 BC. So iron technology kind of is there in the background and emerges through the early part of the Iron Age, if you see what I mean. So it's a little bit now, in the past, people used to think that there was these people called the Celts who brought iron technology, also perhaps brought Celtic art. We know from particularly things like DNA studies. That's certainly not true. The influx of peoples is more perhaps in the Bronze Age than it is in the Iron Age.
A
Is that the so called the Beaker people?
B
Yeah. So that's when we have, we can see more evidence of an influx of people coming from the continent. So in terms of how the Iron Age adopts, it's more of an insular development and perhaps a relationship between changes in the economy, society and ritual in the end of the Bronze Age and new technology coming in. So the idea that there is a new group of people coming in is not the case. It's more in a change in society. So to add to the complexity there, it's also worth remembering that there is almost certainly a change in the climate between about 800 and 400 BC, so it gets a bit colder and wetter. So all of these things are happening concurrent with each other and societies are changing. So that's why when you say when does the Iron Age start? It sounds like a really easy question, but actually it's not quite so easy.
A
Well, at a time when Britain gets a bit more miserable, then it sounds like it does the climate as well.
B
As an archaeologist, I would never say it gets miserable. It just changes.
A
But it's interesting, that gradual process which I'm hearing again and again now with so many ancient episodes, that when new technology comes in, how long it takes people over generations realizing or being able to get their hands on, you know, these new tools, this new metal that they now realize in their new settlements is more valuable, is more useful than, let's say, bronze and so on.
B
Yes. I mean, one of the things you've got to think about with iron technology compared to bronze, it's very different kind of technology. So with bronze objects, you're casting them, iron has to be smelted and then smithed. You know, there's a different process there. They're not the same technological process. Also, it's. It's worth thinking that people don't necessarily see the advantages of iron or perhaps even need the advantage of iron. If you've built an entire economy on bronze, working and obtaining bronze or the materials like tin and copper to make bronze, and you build your whole society on that, iron technology is not necessarily something you want or need to adopt straight away. So we can be a little bit kind of assuming that as soon as people find iron technology, it's better that it's actually when you first make iron, it's not necessarily better than bronze for the things you need it to do. So there is a long period where people are playing with that technology, they're imitating it. So there's a wonderful site in Wales where you've got an import of a sword which is made from iron from the continent, and then there are objects made in iron, but copying bronze types. So people are clearly kind of playing around with this technology, but perhaps not seeing the advantages of it or needing the advantages straight away.
A
Well, let's have a look at the backbone almost of Iron Age society and how these people lived. Is it fair that this time, I mean, agriculture that's at the forefront for people living in Iron Age Britain, an everyday figure, they're living in an agricultural type of settlement.
B
Yes. I mean, throughout the Iron Age, almost everybody is a farmer, even right up into the late Iron Age, you know, that we don't have really specialists, perhaps until the very end of the Iron Age. Most people are farming most of the time, and they are mostly subsistence farmers, in other words, you know, growing enough to feed them and their families, you know, perhaps a little bit of surplus. But they're not creating for, you know, a broader economy.
A
And what's the everyday settlement of one of these Iron Age farmers. I know it's a huge period, it's several centuries, but there is one type of settlement that you, you tend associate with an Iron Age farmer.
B
There are, you know, a lot of people lived in small farmsteads. I mean, I would hesitate to say, as we say, the Iron Age is a long period and incredibly diverse. I mean, one of the things we are very aware of now is the diversity of the kind of settlements you lived in. I mean, you can contrast it from the big stone brocks of northern and western Scotland down to the courtyard house settlements of Cornwall to the unenclosed settlements. So these are scatters of roundhouses that you find in the East Midlands. The cranberries varied, yes, occasionally. You know, they're less common in the British Iron Age, certainly, but crags, yes. So there's a huge diversity. Perhaps most people will think Iron Age hill forts, and we kind of think hill forts are the typical Iron Age settlement. But even then, hill forts are incredibly varied.
A
So that's interesting. I would have actually thought straight away, get to the hill forts in a bit. But the roundhouse, like, surely the small farming settlement and the roundhouse, I mean, you mentioned brocks and all these things. I mean, the kidding. They're always round.
B
Well, the roundhouse is the kind of standard structure that people live in throughout the Iron Age, although they are also incredibly diverse from, you know, quite monumental structures, I mean, that we see in the late Bronze Age and early Iron Age, really big timber built roundhouses, to smaller structures such as stonewalled roundhouses in northern England in the later period. So, but yes, the roundhouse is the kind of the standard structure. I mean, that is in itself interesting as why there's that kind of tendency to build roundhouses, which tells us something about how those households worked, for instance, perhaps even about the way they understood their space in a kind of more symbolic way.
A
So what do we know about the function of roundhouses? Almost like the house of an everyday person in the Iron Age.
B
So, I mean, it was the main habitation for probably a household as communal living. There's very little evidence that they were divided into sort of different rooms or any spaces like that. So. And it's where most of the activities would have taken place within perhaps the doorways, through the lights. So that's where everything is going on. One of the interesting things that's always been fascinating, if somewhat controversial, is this orientation of the doors of houses because they faced east or southeast. A lot of the Time. So there's big discussion about whether that's to avoid wind direction coming from the southwest so it keeps your house less windy and cold. But also the light is coming from the east. But also there's a kind of that tendency towards the southeast. Might be having something to do with symbolic orientation towards the sunrise for instance.
A
And can we imagine these smaller settlements? I've been to Butser Ancient Farm before, I always think of that. But we'll get to the hillforts and the larger settlements in a bit. But with these kind of farmsteads, these roundhouses, generally speaking, do we think from archaeology that you would probably see maybe like three, four or five roundhouses in one of these settlements in like kind of a very small, tight knit community?
B
Yes, again it's a little bit difficult to generalize but certainly, I mean there is actually quite a change over much of particularly southern Britain from the early Iron Age. That's a period from about 800 B.C. through to about 400 B.C. where we have more unenclosed settlements, just a scatter of roundhouses, so perhaps just a few households. So you're talking very small populations. And then as we move into the period after about 400 B.C. people live in what we would call small enclosed farmsteads. So they're digging ditches round their settlements. And again those are perhaps just one or two round houses, so small households. So most of those communities are pretty small. They're the extended household rather than. There are very few sort of villages if you like. Large numbers of households together and livestock, crops.
A
And the building of the roundhouse itself. Is this where we get the word wattle and daub? Quite a lot.
B
Certainly most of those would have been wattle and daub constructed. Yes. There are a few stone footings for roundhouses, particularly in sort of northern England, for instance in Northumberland. But yes, most of them are kind of timber built structures. It's worth remembering, I mean particularly if you, I mean if you've been to Butser, you can think of some of particularly actually the late Bronze Age or early Iron Age roundhouses. These are pretty impressive structures, you know, big use of timber. They're not, you know, the idea that these are kind of mud huts is as you're kind of earlier, you know, reference was talking about.
A
Exactly. We're kind of already displacing that structure.
B
These are these, these are complex structures, big structures. And of course when we're talking about brocks and big monumental structures in Scotland, these are incredibly highly architectural buildings.
A
Don't get me started on the brock, that's another episode, but hopefully we'll have some pictures, some shots of Butter Ancient farm we filmed there in the past. And you. And with Wassel and Daub, it's kind of the. The binding together of lots of. Lots of sticks and then the painting over with the kind of.
B
Yeah, so you're weaving.
A
You're weaving.
B
Yeah, together and then covering it in clay.
A
It's clay.
B
Yeah.
A
And then you can.
B
Animal dung and stuff.
A
Yes, I had insulation.
B
Yes. Yeah.
A
Okay. So that's kind of the everyday farming settlement of the Iron Age that we think of. You mentioned the word hillfort. So, Tom, when we're talking about the British Iron Age, when should we be thinking with hill forts and what should we be thinking?
B
So again, hill forts is one of those terms we use all the time. But actually hill forts are very varied. You know, we can think of really large hill forts. You know, people perhaps be aware of Maiden Castle down in Dorset to quite small hill forts like those in Northumberland. The Cheviot Hill hills is covered in hill forts, but those are probably only including a couple of households, incredibly well constructed monuments with quite substantial ramparts, but they're not big. And again, another thing with hill forts is we think of it as the Iron Age, but we now know that hillforts start in the late Bronze Age. So they're one of these things that continues and develops and changes and they change over time in terms of their roles as well. So some of the early Iron Age hillforts. So again, thinking about sort of 800 to 600 BC somewhere like Uffington in Berkshire, it's probably most people are not living in that hill fort. It's probably a central focus for a wider community. It's probably a storage place for food resources, perhaps for some surplus, but they're probably not actually living there. But then we think of Danebury in the middle Iron Age. So when. I mean that, I mean about sort of 400 to 250 BC, there's quite a lot of people living in there
A
and Maiden Castle as well.
B
Maiden Castle? Yeah, you know, there's a few hundred people living in. In those hill forts. So hill forts are very varied.
A
And I guess also you also think about the big ramparts. If you visit one of these places today, one of the stunning things is getting through those ramparts and then being in that open plain in the middle. For instance, if you're in Maiden Castle and seeing the sheep and all of that. But it is the ramparts and how deep they are even today that you can't help but think about when you visit one of those sites. Yes.
B
And I mean, if you think of the, the size and the entrances as well, the complex entrances, if anybody's been to Maiden Castle or Danebury of kind of getting into these things, there's a huge amount of labour expended on those sites. I mean, one of the big questions for archaeologists is who's constructing them? So is it that there is sort of vassal peoples who are constructing them or is it the inhabitants? I think most archaeologists now for the Iron Age would assume that there is kind of. It's largely done by the inhabitants or as part of the community. This is not sort of hillforts are not necessarily at the top of a settlement hierarchy where they're all. Lots of other people who are kind of dependent on these sites.
A
Because when these hill forts are being built in like the mid Lion Age, this is still centuries before the Romans arrive, is there very much a feeling, there's not written literature down about these people that we can't label them with the tribal names that we have later from the Romans, it's just too far back?
B
No, very much so. I mean, I think trying to kind of identify them to the tribal names, we can talk more about those in the late Iron Age is quite problematic. These are much smaller sized communities than those larger entities. So no, I think that's, you know, these are not, they don't work in the same way. I mean, if you look at Danebury, for instance, in Hampshire, the hill fort there is not the sort of residence of an elite. It's more like a large village, if you like, a large group of roundhouses and communities together. But it doesn't seem to be of any higher status really than many of the other settlements around it.
A
And you said elites there because we, I guess we can't know whether it was a king or warlord or as you mentioned, if there even was one for those.
B
Yeah, I mean, that's been a big discussion in Iron Age studies for, well, for 40, 50 years, really. The idea of whether there is elite, we always assume. And this comes back to sort of things like classical sources, you know, Roman writers. Because Caesar describes Iron Age society in Gaul as being elite and having kings and druids, we kind of think that that must be how the Iron Age in Britain was for all of the Iron Age. But actually archaeologically there's very little evidence for an elite. You know, the things that you might think of as an elite, burial practices and grave goods, that there would be a larger House or more rich material goods at somewhere like Danebury that doesn't exist in the archaeological record. If you look at Danebury, for instance, the kind of things that happened at Danebury, the kind of goods they were using, these kinds of objects they were using, are very similar to the smaller farmsteads we were talking about earlier. So it's very hard to distinguish any obvious elite. That doesn't mean. That doesn't mean there wasn't difference in status between people. And status can be measured in things like number of cattle you have, the number of sheep you have. But I think to think of it as sort of a hierarchy with a king or a chief, I think most Iron Age specialists would suggest that's probably a little bit simplistic.
A
Is it fair to say they probably had a defensive function, or at least some of them would have had a defensive function?
B
Again, you know, sort of saying, you know, you're getting into controversial topics here. I think that's what I do, in a sense. No, that's right, too. In terms of those ramparts. Yes. The key distinction there is thinking, were hill forts attacked all the time? Were they meant to be defended from
A
or to deter or to impress people? I guess, yeah.
B
I think both those things. I mean, we know that some hill forts had violence take place at them. Walbury, for instance, in Somerset. Breeden Hill in south Worcestershire. There's evidence of what we might call massacres. You know, people were killed at hill forts, and they probably were attacked from time to time. I think we kind of get away from that. But those ramparts also, as you just intimated, have a function, just showing the amount of labor that you can consume. It is a demonstration of your power, but it's also a demonstration of how important your community is, perhaps. So I think, you know, the idea that they're always fighting from hill forts is perhaps not quite right.
A
Fair enough. I always think back to Maiden Castle and hearing from Dr. Miles Russell how back then, actually, with the chalk beneath the grass, you don't realize it, but back then, gleaming white would have been visible for miles around. And, you know, that is a statement in itself. So just remembering that and also what mentioned earlier, with the roundhouses and the color that would have been visible, you know. Yes, okay. Chalk is white, but it's not just black and white. Almost in the Iron Age, back then, you know, full of Technicolor, full of wanting to impress and stand out, whether it's with the monumental hill forts or with probably an everyday roundhouse.
B
Yes, definitely. I mean, I think you know, I mean, if you want to talk about color in the Iron Age, you perhaps want to talk about some of the objects that you're using in the, in the middle and late Iron Age, which are of course, you know, some of them bronze, shining bronze, and then adorned with glass and coral and so on, you know, as we were mentioning with Melsonby and so on. So, I mean, color is definitely used to intimate various different identities and attitudes. So, yeah, I think it's good to kind of remind people that the Iron Age is not a blackened world or a green and brown world completely.
A
Well, let's move on then to this other key type assessment and one that I know you've done a lot of work around that seems so tied to the later story of Britain's Iron Age. So what are these things called? Oppida.
B
Right. So oppida are these range of monuments that emerge at the very end of the Iron Age, really. So towards the end of the first century B.C. we call them oppida because that's a term that was used on the continent, particularly by Julius Caesar to refer to sites he encountered in Gaul. And the things that we see in Britain emerge around the same types of these sites in Gaul. So we've kind of transferred the term and it means from Latin, you can translate it as enclosed settlement or town. The confusing thing for the British sites is they are not towns. Not towns as we would understand it. So the classic opperdur in Britain, places like Camelodin and modern Colchester, Colchester to
A
Colchester,
B
underneath Colchester, underneath the medieval and Roman town, is an Iron Age center. Also underneath modern St. Albans site near Melsonby, Stannock. These are the sort of classic oppida. They're characterized by these huge enormous ramparts. I mean, one of the things, you know, we talked about hill forts, but these things have huge earthworks for many of them, like Colchester. Confusingly, these earthworks don't define a nice enclosed area like our hill forts like Dambury. They often define huge areas of landscape. I worked at Badgerton, for instance, encompasses about 200 hectares. Wow. You can quite. Yeah. To get people's heads around that, you can quite easily plonk a Roman town within that quite happily and still have space. But they don't define a nice sort of enclosed area. So one of the things that we've been working on and I've been interested in is what are they doing? How do they use that space? So it's more about defining landscapes for activities, and that's probably telling us about the change in society so by this time, hill forts in many parts of Britain had sort of fallen out of use, probably some time before Oppada really kind of emerged, actually. So society is changing. In the late first century bc, this is the first time that we can start to identify individuals who are calling themselves kings. For instance, they're minting coinage. There are new types of burial rites are emerging. So there are graves with grave goods, something we haven't really seen across the British Iron Age. So society is changing and the opera are the places where those kind of things are manifest.
A
And this is the time when you're starting to get interactions with Rome. So accounts like Julius Caesar, mentions of tribal names and tribal kings and so on. You mentioned the arrival of coinage as well. This is when that becomes another interesting source which you can then use alongside the archaeology to learn more.
B
Definitely. And that is. I mean, it is at the opera that we see much of the interaction with the Roman world. You know, we see imports from the Roman world at sites like Colchester, even at Stannick in the north of England. One of the interesting things there is what that relationship is like. And one of the things I'm really interested in is because we used to, some time ago, think it was about sort of economics, if you like. The Roman Empire expands, and this is a place that you sort of inh societies are trading with, and certainly that work happening to some extent. But a lot of the items we have in some of the burials at places like Lexton at Colchester are probably more like diplomatic goods. There's more of a kind of political relationship, you know, as. As the empire expands and has these. These kingdoms on its peripheries, which it's kind of managing as a political relationship. Howdy, howdy ho, and welcome to Fantasy Fan Fellas. I'm Hayden, producer of the Fantasy Fangirls podcast and your resident lover of all things Sanderson.
A
And I'm Stephen, your bookish Internet goofball, but you can call me the Smash Daddy. And we are currently deep diving Brandon
B
Sanderson's fantasy epic Mistborn. But here's the catch. Steven here has not read Mistborn before.
A
That's right.
B
Hey.
A
Hey. So each week, you'll get my unfiltered raw reactions to every single chapter.
B
And along the way, we'll do character deep dives, magic explainers, and Steven will even try to guess what's next. Spoiler alert. He'll be wrong.
A
News flash, I'm never wrong. Episodes come out every Wednesday, and you can find Fantasy Fan Fellows wherever you get your podcasts.
B
Most People don't realize how much of
A
their personal information is being bought and sold every day.
B
Data brokers are making billions, pulling details about you from public records and the
A
Internet, then packaging and selling it, usually without your consent.
B
That's how your information lands in the hands of scammers, spammers, even stalkers. It's why you get endless robocalls and why ads seem to follow you everywhere. That's where Aura comes in. Aura actively removes your data from broker
A
sites and keeps it off.
B
They also instantly alert you if your information shows up in a breach or on the dark web. But Aura goes beyond data protection.
A
With one app, you get a vpn,
B
antivirus, password manager, spam call protection, dark web monitoring, and even up to $5
A
million in identity theft insurance. All backed by 24, 7 US based fraud support.
B
Other companies might sell just credit monitoring or even just a vpn.
A
Aura gives you all of it together at the same price.
B
Competitors charge for just one service.
A
Start your free trial today@aura.com safety.
B
Protect yourself now@aura.com safety. What started the Civil War? What ended the conflict in Vietnam?
A
Who was Paul Revere and did the Vikings ever reach America?
B
I'm Don Wildman and on American History
A
Hit My expert guests and I are journeying across the nation and through the years to uncover the stories that have made America. We'll visit the battlefields and debate the
B
floors where the nation was formed, meet
A
the characters who have altered it with
B
their touch and count the votes that have changed the direction of our laws and leadership.
A
Find American History Hit twice a week,
B
every week wherever you get your podcasts. American History Hit a podcast from History Hit.
A
So is it fair to say that it's almost. I know you mentioned that there seems to be a little bit of a break between them, but almost the mid Iron Age, the bigger centers in Iron age Britain at least are defined by the great hill forts and activity there. And then the later Iron Age that's replaced with the emergence of these oppida instead. But maybe they have similarish functions.
B
I would probably say no, they have quite different functions in many ways. Many of those hill forts, I mean again it depends where you are in the southwest and Maiden castles is kind of slightly different organization there. But many of the hill forts in Hampshire for instance and up the Welsh marches are, are different kinds of settlements. They're more like small villages, communities. The Opuda mark a very different kind of social organization. They're probably central places for a much larger the emergence of much larger groups of people. So Stannick for instance, that's probably the central place for a whole confederacy of people across much of what is now northern England. The people that referred to by classical writers as the Brigantes. That's very different from the roles of Hillfort's have on a much larger scale. So. So this is the emergence probably of larger social entities that we only see really towards the end of the Iron Age. Things that we can think of as
A
much larger polities and people going still from their roundhouse farmsteads and maybe communal gathering places inside these earthworks at these operative sites.
B
Yeah, well, that's one of the things that really interests me about the Opada, because one of the things that we're seeing in that period is the movement from very, very quite localized societies based on perhaps networks of a few farmsteads exchanging material between themselves, but not perhaps large social entities. The late Iron Age with the opera is the formation of those larger entities. But you've got to have places where you negotiate that. How do you negotiate those relationships? And the opera in those big empty spaces is perhaps the place you do it for assembly. I mean, one of the things that, if we can believe some of the things that people like Caesar say is that Late Iron Age societies is about negotiated power. The elites have to kind of forge assemblies. He talks about this happening in Gaul where they have to decide as a group, a collective, you know, are we going to go to war? Are we having an alliance with these people? It's the opposite of where those spaces happen. And you can imagine the empty areas that we have in these sites, because much of the interior of them is not full of settlements. It's open. That's where they're gathering those people together. One of the things that fascinates me is that there's also the impact from the expanding Roman Empire. But you've got to also remember that there's been a large increase in the number of settlements over the Laterion Age. So from about 300 BC, you just see an increase pretty much everywhere of settlements across Britain. There's more people in the landscape, there's more people who've got to negotiate access to land. So there has to be places where that takes place. And I think to some extent, maybe Oppada are the kind of culmination of that. How do we negotiate who owns what land? How do we negotiate between those?
A
I'm trying to think as if it's almost the Iron Age equivalent to an extent of something like Glastonbury, you know, but if you know what I mean, lots of people in an area together, probably very smelly as well after several days there. But for an important event, of course, we can use ceremonial, but of course, big decisions for the larger polity that they're part of. Maybe they'll see the figure at the top, you know, a king or a queen and so on there too.
B
Yeah, I think. I mean, you know, I like your analogy with Glastonbury, but, you know, assembly places. So, you know, anybody who's sort of looked at early medieval world, you can think of assembly places there being somewhere where even if you have a king, that king has to negotiate their power. They have to come and they have to have the other members of those communities come together and negotiate their authority, you know, make that decision as a collective. And again, this is a rural community, so people are most of the time in their farmstead still. They're perhaps sending one member to come up, to come to those assemblies, represent them, make those decisions as a collective. So this is a really exciting time because it's that idea that we have kings, but these are not kings, as you might think from the high medieval period. This is more about a negotiated power structure. So oppodora are perhaps. And why I find them exciting is that those societies are trying to work out, out how do you do that, you know, how do you negotiate power in a different way that hasn't really existed before.
A
Do you think this is a good place? I think we can bring in chariots here and go back to the mels and be hoard, because processions, we can be thinking about maybe happening there, a display of power, a display of wealth, you know, happening at places like Oppida. And of course, one of the big vehicles we associate with Iron Age Britain is the chariots. Or is wagons elaborate vehicles?
B
Certainly chariots are something that shows sort of characteristic of the British Iron Age. I mean, we only know them from burials, really, from East Yorkshire in the middle Iron Age. But in the late Iron Age, we know they existed from the parts we find. And even Caesar mentions how important chariots are in warfare for the Britons. Yeah, I mean, one of the exciting things about Melsonby is the idea that we have some other vehicles as well, these four wheeled wagons, which, if we compare them to what's happening on the continent, where they're thought of as being sort of ceremonial vehicles, as you say, either for the funerary event or for display. Yes. You can imagine people kind of processing round in these vehicles, you know, perhaps being taken to the funerary rite on these vehicles. Yeah, I mean, one of the other exciting things from Melsonby, and we kind of get a bit obsessed by the vehicles and the chariots, which are exciting, don't get me wrong, but is the kind of. Is the cauldron is the wine mixing vessel that we have there from the earlier hoard that was discovered there, a large bucket for drinking beer. So there's communal feasting going on. And you can again imagine that if your authority is about trying to negotiate with other people, you throw feasting, you know, show to get support from those individuals. You know, that's. That's the way power is manifest and
A
in time as well. It may be even place like Yorkshire in Stanwyck, do we think that, you know, they bring in things like amphora, they're bringing in Roman goods as well.
B
They're.
A
They're very much adopting those, those ideas, those object, those luxuries from beyond the borders of Britain.
B
Certainly in the opera by the late Iron Age, some of the. The elite, if you like, that are emerging, are adopting items from the Roman world, drinking vessels, beakers or from Gaul as well as that's now part of the, you know, Roman Empire, and drinking wine. So, yes, they are. And I mean, that's another interesting thing because there's clearly an imitation of Roman, but also Gaelic Gallic elites, they're imitating as well at the time of conquest to imitate their partner elites on the continent, if you like, in a different way. I mean, one of the things that's really fascinating, in a sense, that's also changing identity. One of the things that you see from much of the earlier middle Iron Age, it's quite hard to see the individual. For most of the Iron Age, we don't have burials or grave goods. There are exceptions like East Yorkshire, but for most of the time, that's the case in Britain. It's hard to see and people are not. Well, not many people are using things like brooches and stuff. It's quite hard to see the individual in the archaeological record. Once we get to the end of the Iron Age, with the burials and so on, associated with opera, you can start to see individuals, but also through the way they're eating. We have beakers and platters. This is about individual drinking. It's your cup, it's your plate that doesn't exist before. So clearly the individual is becoming more important. So there's a change in some people's identity to express the individual identity, which is perhaps again related to how power changes. You know, it's more about, you than the collective.
A
And what is a, let's say a high ranking individual of the late Iron Age? What do you think? What are they supposed to be in the eyes of the community? What skills are they supposed to have? What can we gather from that, you know, with the surviving archaeology? What insights can we get into late Iron Age community from those burials and, and things like that?
B
That's a really good question. One, one possibility is that they are to sort of negotiate that community, perhaps negotiate with external groups to offer also power, I mean, in terms of support in warfare, to lead that group when warfare is being consulted, to consult the interaction with the Roman Empire. So I think that's one of the roles that they have is that kind of, they are the sort of, I mean, often you can think of them as leaders. They're negotiating with, with the outside world, if you like.
A
And it's not just men we should be thinking about in these positions of power in Iron Age Britain, is it, Tom?
B
No. So, I mean, we've known from Roman historians like Tacitus that there were powerful women in Iron Age Britain, Boudicca, but also Queen Cartamandua, who's in North Yorkshire. What's exciting is that the archaeological evidence is really kind of emphasizing that in the past, you know, historians have sort of struggled. Is this. The Romans making a point of this? Because it's exceptional.
A
Two queens in that sit.
B
Yeah. And this is. And they make a big thing of it because perhaps it's unusual, but actually it's probably not unusual. So there's fantastic evidence from ancient DNA evidence now which is showing, particularly in Southwest, but also in East Yorkshire of the sort of the relatedness of females, so that the power seems to be going through the female line. So there might be that women sort of. So women stay in the same place, they have maybe more power over land and that men come into those communities and perhaps they do other things in society. But there is, there's also been, you know, we've known for some time, if we go back to East Yorkshire burials and you mentioned chariots, with chariots and wonderful grave goods from Wet Wang Slack in Yorkshire, for instance, where you have this fantastic iron mirror. It's very enigmatic being so the, you know, high status grave goods which indicate that women are getting the same kind of treatment as some men.
A
So, so women. So some of those graves in East Yorkshire with chariots in them also belong to women?
B
Yes, oh, yes, yes. And they have, you know, wonderful graveyards. You know, I mean, Iron mirror, this is a wonderful one which has this kind of what's called a bean counter which does underplays it, but this is very enigmatic copper alloy object, you know, which we don't really know what it's for. So that's always hinted to us that women have, you know, can have status and have status. I think the DNA evidence is really exciting because it's kind of, it's emphasizing that, that that's, you know, there's clear evidence for that, you know, and the relatedness and, and also that it's not just Dorset, that it's probably happening in other parts of Britain. So, so when we have the individuals that Tacitus mentions, like Queen Cartamandia, we, we shouldn't be so surprised and that perhaps we only know about them because Roman historic, they came into contact with the Roman world. But there were others.
A
Those are the high status women, you know, that they're interacting with, but that, you know, that evidence from graves in East Yorkshire but also in Dorset. Kind of the two main areas where we find a lot of human remains.
B
Yes, and that's one of the, you know, the, one of the kind of interesting issues. The burial record from the Iron Age is, is incredibly varied. But it's only really in Dorset and East Yorkshire that you have what we call an inhumation. Right. So, right. The body going into the ground and in both areas, sometimes with grave goods, so things buried with people, of course that's really useful because then you've got the bodies you can associate with the grave goods. You can do things like DNA analysis, isotope analysis and so on. For much of Britain, throughout much of the Iron Age, that's not what happens to the dead. It's incredibly buried. What happens to the dead? You do have inhumation burials in hill faults, in farmsteads for instance, but often just, it's obviously clearly just a small proportion of the population who lived there. What happened to the rest of the population is quite a complicated story. We don't know. But I mean if you dig any Iron Age site really across Britain you will often find fragments of human remains in ditches, in roundhouse post holes and so on. Bits of leg bones, bits of skull.
A
So your dead relative buried under the floorboards?
B
Well, I mean that's, yeah, maybe not quite that, but I mean there is a, there is an interesting question there because we are still sort of trying to establish what happened to the dead. For a long time we suspected there was excarnation. So in other words placed in, on platforms or in trees and sort of, you know, left out to sort of. Of rot and to be picked up by animals and birds and so on. And then the remains went into archaeological features. It's somewhat more complicated than that because there's been some wonderful studies that show that sometimes bodies went in the ground and then were dug up again and moved around. And sometimes bodies were probably mummified. They were probably kept above ground.
A
Wow.
B
And then deposited. So what's interesting, there are, I mean, some wonderful examples of. It's a skull which have holes drilled in them, and so people are, you know, hanging bits of bodies up. So, I mean, it's really interesting because I think, you know, the attitudes towards the dead are probably much more varied, fluid. And I think, you know, you can sometimes think, oh, isn't that disrespectful? But perhaps not, you know, it's more about actually the dead being part of the community.
A
Well, once again. And like, we've done Ice Age examples of cannibalism when actually it's actually a part of the ritual. I'm not saying that for Iron Age stuff at all, but once again, getting our mind around different ways that they honor the dead.
B
Yeah.
A
That, you know, of their family and so on. And there's some bug body examples, aren't there? Quite a few from.
B
I mean, the famous one is Lindau Man. Obviously, again, the bug bodies perhaps are part of that sort of continuum, if you like. You know, the bulk bodies are there and certainly treated in special ways. Wet places almost certainly have significance in the Iron Age. But in a sense, the bog bodies are perhaps part of the continuum that we see in other forms, which are now skeletons, if you like, not preserved, but actually part of this way of treating the dead in different ways. And one of the things that interests me is that that might also relate to what you did in life. Did you die in battle? Therefore, you get one treatment. Perhaps you're interred, you're inhumation, perhaps somewhere on the settlement site. If you died in a different way, you get treated in different ways.
A
We're going to explore a bit one particularly grim other way of dying. In a bit, we're going to explore human sacrifice. But before we get there, you mentioned fighting in battle. Is this a clear part of Iron Age British society? Because in the past, we always. You look at the great hill fort, you look at the ramparts, the chariots and so on, and you think warrior society. How far can we say that, you know, the people like the men of Iron Age Britain, that they were warrior societies, that they were expected to fight.
B
Certainly violence is Part of Iron Age society, You know, we have individuals who have sword cuts to the head. We were talking about Stannic earlier. You go, stannic. There's a wonderful example with a skull with a sword cut. It is obviously a sword cut to the head, buried in the ditch. Yeah.
A
And it just cuts into the skull.
B
So I mean. And then we have many examples of that. I guess one of the interesting things is when we then take that to say about, is it a warrior society? So when we talked about hill forts, it's very hard to see a warrior elite living at Hillforts. In many ways, it's hard to see a warrior elite. So we have some burials of what you might call warriors. There's a wonderful one at Mill Hill in Kent where you have an individual buried with shield sword. And so you can say this individual is a warrior. But most people are not treated like that to the Iron Age. So they're actually relatively unusual. So if it was a warrior society, wouldn't we find more of those? You know, if we think of East Yorkshire, there are individuals who are buried with weapons, but not all of those people and not most of those people. And when we look at the evidence of trauma, so violence on bodies, you know, it's only about 8% of the remains from somewhere like Danebury have trauma on it. Now it's a question of what proportion you'd expect. But what I mean by that is that violence is a part of those societies. But there's a big difference from being a warrior elite. You know, I always love. There's a great quote by an Iron Age specialist who said it's, you know, farmers who fight. You know, they are farmers most of the time who do fight. As I said before, you know, if you think of there are massacres, there's wbury, there's Breedon Hill, where you have violence. People who were clearly killed, probably massacred at the site. So there is interpersonal violence. But I think it's from the evidence we have from the human remains that I think it's unlikely that this is happening all the time. Everybody. And. And for some people, you may get status through warfare, through violence, but I think this is probably not always the case and perhaps not often the case,
A
because you might want to think of somewhere like an opera like Stannick or somewhere similar, Colchester, Cam Ludnum, where you mentioned how the gathering of people all together, I guess, could there be a theory that maybe once in a while, if they'd had a disagreement with a nearby people, the elite, they gather there in their charities. The farmers are expected to gather with their spears and slings, and that's the kind of the classic. And then off they go for a quick fight.
B
Yeah, I mean, I think it's certainly, certainly in the late Iron Age, those kind of, you know, battles between groups of Iron Age people certainly happened. And throughout the Iron Age, you know, certainly violence was part of society. There was warfare. I think where I'm sort of distinguishing, I guess, is from the kind of assumption that status is always kind of gain through violence. I mean, we were just talking about female power, and that's probably more through ownership of land. And so. And it's probably land that's most important. So is that kind of is that difference between saying, is violence part of society or is it a warrior elite? And I think that might sound like, you know, nitpicking, but actually, I think it's really important to think, how do you gain status? And violence is probably one way, but it's perhaps not common all the time. ACAST powers the world's best podcasts. Here's a show that we recommend. If you've ever dreamed of quitting your job to take your side hustle full time, listen up. This is Nikayla Matthews Akom, host of side Hustle Pro, a podcast that helps you build and grow from passion project to profitable business. Every week you'll hear from guests just like you who wanted to start a business on the side. And if you can't run a side hustle, you can't run a business. They share real tips and so I
A
started connecting with all these people on LinkedIn and I saw target supplier diversity was having office hours.
B
Real advice. Procrastination is the easiest form of resistance and the actual strategies they use to turn their side hustle into their main hustle. Getting back back in touch with your tangible cash and sitting down and learning to give your money a job like it changes something. Check outside Hustle Pro every week on your favorite podcast app and YouTube. Acast helps creators launch, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere.
A
Acast.comorial day in Los y compra los vasicos parelo gar pormenos ahoro centadolares en la parria gas de cuatro que madores charm Royal performance series Ademasa or Rantai
B
cinco porciento Electrodomes electos no estra mejor
A
selection estaki and Lowe's. Lowe's nosotros Ayudamos 2 auras.
B
Mastercano.
A
So let's talk about religion. Does Iron Age religion, or for most of the Iron Age period in Britain, is it quite invisible to see examples of ritual and religion?
B
So for much of the Iron Age, there is little in the way of temples or sanctuaries. They appear at the very end of the Iron Age, where we see belief is through things like remains buried on settlement sites, both human remains, but also animal remains, structured, sometimes so, arranged in unusual ways, which are probably some kind of ritual activity, offerings on settlement sites. Even the structure of the way the settlements are organized, mentioning about the way round houses can be orientated towards the rising sun. So the way you structure the space of your settlement is also about reflecting ritual and belief. But there's not a place probably where you go and do ritual for much of the Iron Age. It's in your everyday experience.
A
And so is. But is there an importance of the natural landscape? Can we gather that? I mean, I might also think of objects like the Battersea Shield or the. The Waterloo helmet, which you can go and see in the British Museum today. Do we get a sense that there is a real attachment to wooded areas, to rivers and so on throughout the Iron Age?
B
Certainly certain places in the landscape have of symbolic significance. So you're right. So some of the. We have less metalwork deposition in rivers than we had in the Bronze Age, but it's still happening and it's interesting. So you mentioned some of the shields, something like the Witham Shield from Lincolnshire, where there are places where people go and deposit material. There's a great place called Fiskerton, where there's a kind of platform that goes into the river and they're clearly depositing valuable objects, probably sometimes human remains, some of the dead, you know, and that's another enigma of what happens to some of the dead. Maybe they go into rivers and there are special places where that happens. Again, what's interesting about some of that is those objects, you know, like Witham Shield, you know, this is perhaps again a communal act. It's a community coming together. The fact that you put it into a wet place, you don't bury it with your warrior, is perhaps saying this is about the communal act.
A
So let's talk about druids. What do we know about druids in Iron Age Britain?
B
So we know about druids, really, from Roman writers, particularly. Julius Caesar mentions druids when he's in Gaul, and he mentions the fact that druids existed in Britain and they were important archaeologically. It's very difficult to see the existence of druids. So there are exceptional burials we have these kind of little bronze spoons which divide into quarters, which are kind of weird objects. And there's, you know, there's a burial in Scotland which has one of them. And these could be kind of ritual items. But actually, trying to identify Druids in the archaeological record is very difficult for the Iron Age. And we don't see them in burials. We don't see them. So it's hard to know how significant they were, certainly for much of the Iron Age. And perhaps if they were significant, it's only towards the late Iron Age Age.
A
Gosh, Duina. Can we say anything about them at all?
B
I mean, the thing with the Druids is, archaeologically it is hard to see them. So one of the burials associated with Colchester at Stanway, people which has medical equipment in it, people saying, oh, is this. Is this for divination? Is that. But it's really hard to make that leap archaeologically to these individuals. So. And as I say, for most of the Iron Age, for most of the time, ritual practice seems to be something that's done perhaps more by and within the community and try identify those ritual specialists is quite difficult. And as you can tell, something that's going to be quite controversial, really.
A
Fair enough. I mean, one thing I will then ask, though, is the human sacrifice question. Archaeologically, is it more clear to see evidence of human sacrifice in Iron Age remains?
B
Certainly individuals died violently, so, you know, in terms of. And perhaps some people were sacrificed, but again, you know, how and why they were killed is often quite hard to see archaeologically. And I think we have to be a bit kind of careful of. This all comes from sort of trying to take the classical sources and say, can we see that in the archaeological record? And I think that's. That's always a little bit difficult to sort of interpret it through the lens of the classical writers, rather than thinking, how did these people die? Why was that? And certainly some of those bog bodies are treated in ways which suggest they were sacrificed. But why and what that means I think is really interesting. I'm going to give you an example. There's a burial that I excavated at Badgerton, so it's a female burial buried in the ditch, and she's buried in a very unusual way. So she was placed in the ditch so that she sort of was on her knees and she fell backwards. Now, she was an elderly female, so we can't, archaeologically, you can't say how old, but she was certainly over 50. And we know from her isotopes that she'd come from long distance. Now, it looks we couldn't find any evidence that she'd sort of had a throat cut, any kind of nicks on the throat or anything. But the burial is kind of, you know, might interpret as being kind of sacrifice, or she's based in the ditch and it's very unusual. Looks like she didn't want to go in. It's not. But actually, if you think of her being an elderly female and the fact that she's come from long distance, the site, in her childhood, she's probably somebody who's really important in society. So does her treatment in death denote something that she was sacrificed, or does it denote actually something that was really. She was a really important member of society? So I think that's where the archaeology. We have to be a little bit nuanced about how we interpret it.
A
Understood you mentioned earlier Offington and that being a prime Iron Age center. Now, when someone mentions Uffington, I do think of the beautiful white horse, the chalk horse on the side of the hill there. And like Iron Age roots, do we believe to that white horse, Early Iron Age. Which leads me to the question of horses in general in the Iron Age. How symbolic, how important do we think horses became to Iron Age societies?
B
Horses are really kind of intriguing when we think about the Iron Age and certainly, certainly throughout much of the Iron Age. In the middle Iron Age, for instance, they're clearly treated differently. So when we're talking about ritual, bits of horse remains are the positive. On sightseeing, there's great examples from Dambray of the leg of a horse. So they seem to be treated in different ways than, say, cattle, sheep. When we get to the late Iron Age, lots of the late Iron Age coinage, they really focus on the horse imagery.
A
And that coinage is beautiful. The surviving coins of our nature bridge British. And those horses that. They look immaculate.
B
Yeah. And they're really stylistic. And, you know, if you think about the Ufferton horse, it has some similarities to some of the depictions on much of the Iron Age coinage. I mean, what. What I always think about that is remembering the Iron Age. Coinage is originally imitating coinage that comes from the Greek world and the Roman world. But they pick the horse. You know, they make a choice to focus on the horse because perhaps of its significance in terms of wealth. And we think of horses or really they should be thought of as ponies. They're quite small, actually. You know, they're small horses, but pulling chariots. By the late Iron Age, we get some coinage which depicts people on horses. The cavalry, you know, is becoming perhaps more important in terms of violence and warfare. And I mean, one of the things that fascinates me is that they're exchanging horses over a long distance. We haven't done lots of the work yet, but with some of the initial isotopes, so, you know, telling where things come from, from the, the bones, in terms of the strontium and the oxygen from my own site, showing that the horses at Pageant have come from Wales. There are other sites. So they're exchanging horses over long distance. So horses are probably a form of status and if you can imagine them pulling your chariots, imagine riding them, you can see that that's a high status animal and something that you want to depict as. That's why it's on coinage. It's how many horses you have is probably how powerful you have.
A
Well, well, there you go, Tom. We've covered a lot of ground and admittedly it's been a big subject to try and tackle. So I appreciate you hanging on in there with my questions going from one thing to the next. Really appreciate it. The legacy of the Iron Age. Of course, we had a look at that passage earlier and how it was seen as kind of backward and uncivilized compared to Rome. But in regards to actually on the ground itself following the Roman conquest, is it fair to say that the Iron Age, I mean, Iron Age way of life, roundhouses and so on, I mean, it doesn't just disappear like that.
B
Not at all, no. I mean, many people lived in roundhouses well into the Roman period, you know, and that wasn't because they were backward, that was because that was a way of living, a choice of living. You might think of Celtic art, we often refer to it as Latin style art in archaeology, but that goes on and has a life of its own.
A
The gold talks and stuff like that.
B
Yeah, well, the stylistic art, the sort of curvilion linear art that, you know, people are familiar with, that comes from the Iron Age and is then used in different ways and adopted and adapted in the Rome in Roman Britain, you know, it becomes and takes on a life of its own. And so of course, beyond the Roman Empire. So the Iron Age doesn't just disappear, it becomes part of Roman Britain and Britain long, long after the Iron Age seems to end.
A
Yes, Tom, how do you think, how should we view Iron Age Britain today?
B
That's a very good question. I would say Iron Age Britain really sets up what we think of Britain. You know, if you think of the landscapes intensively farmed by the end of the Iron Age. You know, they are establishing the opera these large places, many of which become Roman towns. They're still towns today like Colchester. So it really sets the framework for much of what is Britain. I would say an intensively farmed and occupied landscape.
A
Tom, this has been fascinating. So much ground covered. We could do several more hours talking about Iron Age Britain, but we'll, we'll leave it there. It just goes for me to say thank you so much for taking the time to come on the show.
B
Thanks for invite.
A
Well, there you go. There was Professor Tom Moore giving you an introduction to this amazing but still very mysterious world of Iron Age Britain. Still much debate around so many topics regarding Iron Age Britain, how different places in Britain were in those centuries before the Roman invasion. We will put in the show notes links to a couple of other episodes we have recorded over the years about Iron Age Britain. One all about the Druids with the one and only Professor Ronald Hutton and another one about late Iron Age Britain. What we actually know about the very end of the Iron Age at the time that the Romans invade, which also does feature Tom for part of it. Put a link to those episodes in the show notes. Thank you once again for listening. Now, if you've been enjoying the ancients, please make sure to follow the show on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. That really helps us. You'll be doing us a big favor if you'd be kind enough to leave us a rating as well. Maybe even a comment too. Well, we'd really appreciate that. We love interacting with you. Don't forget you can also sign up to History Hit for hundreds of hours of original documentaries with a new release every week. Sign up@historyhit.com subscribe. That's all from me. I'll see you in the next episode.
B
Acast powers the world's best podcasts. Here's a show that we recommend it if you've ever dreamed of quitting your job to take your side hustle full time, listen up. This is Nikayla Matthews, aome host of Side Hustle Pro, a podcast that helps you build and grow from passion project to profitable business. Every week you'll hear from guests just like you who wanted to start a business on the side. If you can't run a side hustle, you can't run a business. They share real tips and so I
A
started connecting with all these people on
B
LinkedIn in and I thought target supplier
A
diversity was having office hours.
B
Real advice. Procrastination is the easiest form of resistance and the actual strategies they use to turn their Side Hustle into their main hustle. Getting back in touch with your tangible cash and sitting down and learning to give your money a job like it changes something. Check out Side Hustle Pro every week on your favorite podcast app and YouTube. Acast helps creators launch, grow, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere. Acast.com
A
aprobecha Los arros de Memorial Day and Los y compra Los vasicos parelo Gar Pomenos Ahoro Chemadores Chart Royal Performance Series. Maria
B
to lois master canoe.
Host: Tristan Hughes
Guest: Professor Tom Moore, Durham University
This episode of The Ancients explores the world of Iron Age Britain, challenging the long-held notion of a primitive and "barbaric" age preceding the Roman conquest. Host Tristan Hughes speaks with leading archaeologist Professor Tom Moore, delving into the latest archaeological findings that reveal a rich, complex, and diverse society. From settlements and daily life to elites, ritual, gender, and the emergence of large social centers, the episode redefines our understanding of this transformative period.
On outgrowing old stereotypes:
“We now have a much better understanding of those societies.” (Tom Moore, 10:50)
On technological change:
“As soon as people find iron technology, it’s better—but when you first make iron, it’s not necessarily better than bronze... people are playing with that technology, but perhaps not seeing the advantages.” (Tom Moore, 15:36)
On women in power:
“There’s fantastic evidence from ancient DNA... that the power seems to be going through the female line … women have more power over land.” (Tom Moore, 45:05)
On violence:
“Violence is part of Iron Age society... but I think it’s unlikely that this is happening all the time.... It’s farmers who fight.” (Tom Moore, 51:03)
On the nature of Iron Age religion:
“Belief is through things like remains buried on settlement sites, both human remains and animal remains... offerings on settlement sites.” (Tom Moore, 56:09)
On horses:
“Horses are probably a form of status... you can see that that’s a high status animal and something that you want to depict.” (Tom Moore, 64:09)
Discovery of the Melsonby Hoard:
“One of the largest hoards of Iron Age metalwork ever encountered... really exciting bits of vehicles, chariots, but also possibly wagons, which we haven’t seen before.” (06:11)
Reflection on color and spectacle:
“The Iron Age is not a black-and-white or a green-and-brown world... some of the objects... shining bronze, adorned with glass and coral...” (28:59)
Glastonbury comparison:
“I like your analogy with Glastonbury... assembly places... even if you have a king, that king has to negotiate their power... make that decision as a collective.” (39:31)
This episode reveals Iron Age Britain as a dynamic, sophisticated, and varied society, full of innovation, ritual, and change—not the “land of barbarians” of old histories. From communal roundhouses and sprawling hillforts to powerful women and impressive ritual landscapes, recent discoveries invite us to rethink the roots of British society and identity.
For more, see the episode links on Druids and Late Iron Age Britain in the show notes.