Chris Peters (1:17)

IPhone 17 Pro 256 gigs 1099.99 and new line minimum 100 plus a month.

Max Boltman (1:21)

Plan with auto pay plus taxes and fees required. Best mobile network in the US based.

Chris Peters (1:23)

On analysis by Oaklove Speed Test Intelligence.

Max Boltman (1:25)

Data 1H 2025 Visit T mobile.com PURA brings smart fragrance and function together. Premium scents, smart app control and sleek design. And here's the best part. Your first set of fragrances is free. Hurry to pura.com now and upgrade your home today.

Chris Peters (1:54)

This is the Athletic Hockey Show Prospect Series. Hey everybody.

Max Boltman (2:09)

Max Boltman here alongside the Athletic Scott Wheeler and Corey Promman and Flow Hockey's Chris Peters for another episode of the Athletic Hockey Show Prospect Series. And guys, there will be some young player prospects discussed today, but I would say this really falls more in the category of more like the Scouting series because what we're talking about today is the Olympic rosters for USA and Canada. We're going to do kind of a mock preliminary roster meeting. These rosters are going to be due at the very end of the calendar year, December 31st. And all that these GMs have to do is whittle down pools of the very best players on earth into neat, tidy teams of 23 should be very simple for them.

Chris Peters (2:47)

Now, we do have a nice starting.

Max Boltman (2:48)

Place because we saw the Four nations rosters, but Corey and Scott did us the huge favor of going through an advanced and tiering out some of the players that we're going to be discussing. So as we start with Team Canada here, I want to go ahead and have you read the locks for Team Canada?

Scott Wheeler (3:04)

The locks for Team Canada up front I think are pretty straightforward. It breaks down into just six names. I think we saw the middle of the roster get a little bit muddied with different performances at the Four nations, but the core six is Connor McDavid, Nathan McKinnon, Braden Point, Sam Rinehart, Mitch Marner and Sidney Crosby. I think up front it would be pretty surpr for any of those players not to be a part of this group. And then on defense, it's a much smaller group. Defense is where everything seems to be wide open. I think in net, Jordan Binnington is considered a lock, but on D, it might just be two, if not one names. And I'd be interested to hear feedback on the second name. We all know that Kale Makar is on the team. Kayl Makar is going to be the number one defenseman for the team. He's going to run the top power play for the team. He's probably even going to penalty kill for this team. And then the second name that I sort of felt was a lock when I was flipping through them was Josh Morrissey, who's been kind of at the fringes of Norris ballots over the last few seasons here and has really established himself as one of the better defensemen in the Western Conference and the number one defenseman on one of the top teams in the league in Winnipeg. So I don't think any of those are up for debate except maybe Morrissey, who there's probably an argument to be made that guys like Shea Theodore and Devin Toews are equals to Josh Morrissey, but they played Morrissey a lot at the Four nations, and I think he's, I think he's a pretty safe bet.

Max Boltman (4:27)

I assume nobody has any quibbles with that group. I mean, does anyone feel like Morrissey doesn't belong in the locks group here?

Chris Peters (4:33)

I, I, I think he does. I mean, you know, I think that really, for, for Canada, it is interesting because I think you're talking about how do you balance this group? What kind of style do you need? And those are questions that are going to be answered down the lineup a little bit, I think, in terms of consistent Performers, it's hard to find better than Morrissey in terms of a guy where you know exactly what you're getting out of them on a, on a night to night basis. And then you've also got, you know, the, the, the Four nations as the example. And you know, I think it's hard to argue with some of the guys that were there, but obviously they're gonna have to make a couple of changes here. So really it's actually pretty fascinating because we're gonna talk about the US later where I think that the decisions are maybe fewer in terms of how many there will actually have to be made. But yeah, I mean, I think to Scott's point, the fact that we're only talking really about two locks on D kind of suggests that there's a lot of questions that need to be answered about how Canada wants to play at the Olympics with, with the group that they have available to them.

Max Boltman (5:33)

All right, so the meat of this discussion is probably going to be on the bubble guys. But before we get to the bubble, Scott, there's also a tier of players who you think are going to be on this team. It's just not quite in the Nathan McKinnon, Connor McDavid lock level. And those players that you have singled out here are Brandon Hagel, Anthony Sorelli, Sam Bennett, Seth Jarvis, Mark Stone, Brad Marchand at forward and on D, Thomas Harley Shea Theater, Devon Toews in goal, Aiden Hill, Sam Monte. As I went through that forward list of the front runners and I got to Mark Stone and Brad Marchand, I started to feel a little bit less sure that those are true front runners. And I don't know, like, those might be more bubble guys for me. Is that. What do you think about this, Corey?

Corey Pronman (6:15)

I, I tend to agree, particularly Martian. Even though he looked better in the playoffs there for Florida, he really struggled at the Four Nations. And you, you wonder with, with, you know, same argument can be made for Stone in some ways, which is just the age of those players. And we're going to maybe get that with like a Drew Doughty too. We get to him is you get those, you know, those, those 35 plus guys a year older and you kind of wonder whether they're not that they can't make the team, but whether definitely Marchand is like, if he's a front runner or not. I think he's going to need to have a really good first half just to be considered a top 12 forward on this team.

Max Boltman (6:52)

So Scott, why did you consider them? I mean, obviously they're on the Four nations team that is a feather in their cap. But what made you feel like they belonged in this category?

Scott Wheeler (6:59)

I think part of it for, for Brad is experience with the coaching staff, Experience in general, his identity as a player, heart and soul guy. I think they likely view him as a player who play up and down the lineup, who can play with any mix of linemates, who could play on their fourth line, who could slide up a little bit higher. I think him and Bennett are in a unique position now that Alexander Barkov is out in Florida, where they're going to have to be counted on early on this season. And I think that will be of benefit to them. They're probably going to play more. They're going to be more involved in the power play, their points. I think despite how valuable Barkov is as a line mate for some of the players there, this might go for Carter Verhagi there too. There's just more of an opportunity now for these guys, especially Ben, to really step up. But I think, I think Brad sort of fits into that group as well. And push comes to shove, it just feels like if it's between him and a Robert Thomas or a Nick Suzuki or a younger player who also struggled at last year's tournament like Travis Koneckney, I think push comes to shove, they will just go with the guy that Hockey Canada knows. And that's. That's Marchand Stone's an interesting one. I, I don't really view Stone as a bubble guy. Like, I think Stone would have to play poorly in the front half of the season not to be on this team. They're going to trust him. I think they would view him as a penalty killer, defensive zone guy. Like, I think they, they just trust Mark Stone. Marshan's the one where I could see the argument that you guys are making more so than Stone, I think. And I didn't even love Stone at last year's tournament.

Corey Pronman (8:30)

No, I didn't either. Shaya Theodore is one I wonder about too. Not that I don't think he. He won't make the team, but I think a lot of the conversation we're going to have about Canada and the US Bubble players is in regards to how they play at the four nations. And he didn't four nations last year due to injury. So he's a guy who. I just wonder if he's. I think when you start getting to seventh a like he's somewhere in that conversation for Canada. But we're talking about like, you know, by putting him here, basically insinuating He's a top four D for them and I'm not, not quite sure that's a, that's a guarantee right now.

Max Boltman (9:04)

I think with Stone, Chris, the thing that I come back to is like his career has been amazing. It's Mark Stone three years ago, I think is not even just a front, probably a lock for this team. The injuries have started to catch up, you know, and I don't think that this is going to be like a super physical tournament, at least not in the way the four nations was. But I do think we can have a Nick Suzuki who's also an elite NHL two way forward and it's a younger player who I think you just feel a little better about where the body's going to be at and you're going to be bringing him along for the future. That's where I would start to go. Why not Suzuki over a Gaston?

Chris Peters (9:37)

Yeah, you know, I think that that's probably the player that I would look at as well. I mean, and even you could say, you know, we're going to probably talk about him as well. You know, what about a, you know, a celebrity on the wing? You know, as well as a guy that has kind of this more. He plays the game hard, he's got good two way capabilities, he's got the speed factor. I think when you look up and down the Canada lineup and you have, you know, the guys that, you know, you know, I think that you want to have a team that has that physicality which is, you know, physicality, but also plays with a lot of PA. Pace. And I think that the Olympics are going to be played at a pace even faster than what we saw at the, at the, at the four Nations. And so that's where that's, that's one of those spaces where I do start to worry a little bit about Mark Stone in terms of the overall capability, you know, in terms of the just keeping up with it and where guys like Suzuki and potentially Celebrini or others that are a little bit younger and like you said, kind of have a little bit more of that reliability factor to them in terms of their health. That's, that's also important. So, you know, I, I don't really, I don't have a too many quibbles. Like I think Stone is absolutely in the mix here. I think he's going to be a guy that they have to take a really long look at considering, you know, so many of the different things that he brings to the table. Not the least of which is, you know, this, the fact that he's got experience in these, these high level situations. But yeah, I mean, I, I just think that these are going to be these, these, those types of decisions though, are the ones that I think are really critical for this Canada team because I don't think you can use the Four nations as a one to one blueprint for what you're going to do here. I think you got to take some of the learnings and like we said, didn't have an amazing four nations. You know, how can you afford that at the Olympics where the, the stakes just feel higher. There's so much more attention and obviously there's, there's a lot of pressure. But I think in the veteran presence department, that's something that I could see this coaching staff much more comfortable with a Mark Stone relative to the two guys that we just talked about.

Scott Wheeler (11:33)

I think it's interesting that none of us mentioned Seth Jarvis in the conversation of front runner guys that we would be uncertain about with Seth being the youngest player from that group.

Chris Peters (11:44)

Yeah, you know, I think a lot of it has to do with, you know, some of the things that we just said, like this is a team that's going to want to play with pace. This is a team that's going to want to be up and down the ice quickly. And I think that he brings that. I think we've seen that from him now a little bit more frequently. And, and I just think with that year, that extra experience that he has now and also getting through, you know, the Stanley cup playoffs a little bit more, kind of doing some of these other things. Jarvis is a guy that, you know, while he doesn't necessarily have the size, he does just about everything you need for a player to, to win hockey games where when it comes to playing with the ability to get up and down the ice and then also playing hard, you know, he's, he's a bit of a pest and kind of gets under guy's skin, but does it in a way that's not going to hurt you in the penalty box. It's not going to hurt you in a lot of other ways. So I really think that, you know, with this, you know, we have to keep in mind that the, the Four nations was not played with IIHF rules. It was played with NHL rules, essentially, which does create a different kind of game. Yeah, I think players like Seth Jarvis fit really well into that.

Max Boltman (12:46)

It's a versatility.

Corey Pronman (12:48)

Yeah. Bring it back to Marshawn for a second. I think you can kind of have a debate about One of those guys versus the other. And I think obviously Marsh has been a fantastic NHL player through his career and you can argue has more pure skill than Jarvis. But I think if you're looking for a fourth line winger with energy, I think Jarvis probably has a better case to be that player in February.

Scott Wheeler (13:10)

Do we have any qualms with me slotting Thomas Harley ahead of Travis Sandheim, Colton Perako, Drew Doughty, 3D who were also on that team last year?

Max Boltman (13:21)

I don't because I think Harley became one of the breakout stories of that tournament. Right. You know, right. At the same level as like. I mean, maybe even more than like. Yeah. And the league throughout, you know, as Miro Hayeskin and was hurt and he took on more and more attention. I think Thomas Harley goes into this. I think it's. He's got a spot to lose almost.

Scott Wheeler (13:39)

Yeah, I agree.

Chris Peters (13:40)

Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's. Isn't that crazy how that that happens, though? He's. He just ends up on the team and then it's like, oh, hey, this guy is actually probably better at this point, you know, so, yeah, I had no. No qualms with that.

Corey Pronman (13:52)

That's gonna be the same conversation with Jake Sanderson, who wasn't on the team, and then by the end, he was one of their best players.

Chris Peters (13:58)

Yep, exactly.

Max Boltman (13:59)

That's a better comp.

Scott Wheeler (14:00)

I wonder even in Dallas if there's a bit of a push and pull this year between Harley and Heiskin and in terms of some of the. Some of the offensive zone opportunities and that kind of a thing. Power play, and it'll be interesting.

Max Boltman (14:12)

All right, so those are our Canadian locks and front runners. We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and we're talking about the bubble and the dark horses. Don't raise your voice to prove you're right.

Chris Peters (14:26)

Focus your mind with every word of.

Max Boltman (14:29)

Irrefutable fact you can find, because conviction.

Chris Peters (14:33)

Is the calm that comes when you know that you really do know. People who read the Financial Times know that they can shape their own perspectives with confidence because their viewpoints are informed by genuinely unbiased journalism, clarity and conviction. Source FT subscribe to the financial times@ft.comSourceFT.

Capital One Bank Guy (14:54)

Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One bank guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast, too. Ah, really? Thanks. Capital One bank guy. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capitalone.com bank capital1na member FDIC.

Chris Peters (15:22)

Old school security kicks in after the break in. Too late. SimpliSafe rewinds the story.

Max Boltman (15:28)

Stopping crime before it starts. Active guard Outdoor protection.

Chris Peters (15:31)

Uses AI powered cameras to detect intruders, alert live monitoring agents and can deter intruders before they reach your door. Its proactive protection plus a 60 day.

Max Boltman (15:40)

Money back guarantee and no contracts.

Chris Peters (15:42)

To get 50% off your new system, go to SimpliSafe.com podcast. That's SimpliSafe.com podcast. There's no safe like SimpliSafe.

Max Boltman (15:54)

All right, we're back and we're going to go now to I think the meat of this discussion which is the bubble. So Scott, from what you've outlined you had 12. I think we're kind of talked Marchand into the bubble conversation. So we're going to say we've got 11 forwards, five D and three goalies for this Canadian roster. That leaves three forwards and three D to battle this out that are going to make for some really interesting decisions between now and December 31st. What I want going into that is for each of you to give me. Let's start with the forwards. Which three forwards, Corey, would you take from this bubble group to complement Canada's forward group?

Corey Pronman (16:30)

Oh man, this, this is really tough and it's going to be hard not to make some people very mad depending which way we go. The one name that stood out to me right away is Robert Thomas. Like I think he's Nick Suzuki with the, with the skill, the hockey sense, the two way ability. But there's a little bit more pace in his game. I know you guys mentioned Suzuki earlier. I would lean towards Thomas kind of like that, that all around centerman that I'd like to bring. So I think he's the obvious one to me. And then after that it's, it gets really murky. I would have a hard time bringing Kinectne after how he looked at the four nations. I think he probably played his way out of the mix for me. Barring a really good first half. Tavares is how we have listen him as a bubble guy here. I think his skating would be too problematic for me to get him in there. The one name I'm really drawn to and it's not a sexy name and it's not maybe the highest scoring name of this group like, like Shively would be or Suzuki would be Carter Verheagy. You know this is a Guy who's just won two Stanley Cups. I think there's a lot of elements in his game that are really attractive. He's a good skater. He works hard. He's got plenty of offense. You can deploy him in a, in a variety of situations. You know, I think you look at that Florida team and we might talk about Marshand earlier. I think there were plenty of times you watch them and you think for Hagee was just as impactful, if not more so. And I think, I think that'd be the second name for me. The third name is really dicey. I, I think the best player is Suzuki. I don't know if I can bring Thomas and Suzuki. I think you need a little bit more variety there. I, I'm guessing it would be either, you know, Zach Hyman or Scheifele from, from my third forward and I might lean towards Scheifele just in case one of my skill guys go down and I need some money there to give me some offense. That's the way I'd have it. I could. It's kind of funny when you think about this is I can see one or all of you guys having three completely different names. And like, I, I'd be really curious to see how much we actually overlap because, like, we didn't, I didn't even mention like Celebrini, who I'd love. I love the idea of ringing celebrity. I love Macklin Celebrini, but it might be too early and we know we meant, I don't know. We'll, we'll see how, what everybody says here.

Max Boltman (18:55)

But is there such thing as. Because I think Celebrini would be in my three here. I think, I like the fact that he's young and I think it's a good thing for the Canadian program to bring a guy like that who I think absolutely is ready to play at the level. But more importantly, even if he is your 14th forward and isn't playing, he's soaking that up. He's seeing what it feels like. Maybe he gets into one or two games in group play. You know, I'm not saying Canada has to build their 2026 Olympic roster with 2030 and 2034 in mind, but it's not a bad thing to keep in the back of your head like we see at the World Juniors. Chris.

Chris Peters (19:26)

Yeah, exactly right. I mean, and, and, and celebrating would be in my three as well, you know, And I, I, I think that the, it's not just about preparing for the future. I think that he does a Lot of the things that Suzuki does, but faster. I think he also has some of these, you know, he just, the way he plays just fits really well. And that's the thing is like Suzuki to me, like if you're, if you're asking me among the bubble players who I would have on there, Suzuki would be one of my three, you know, and, and I think that he, it's, it does come down like him and Robert Thomas, I think Scheifele would also be in that group for me. And then on top of that I would also have Carter Verhe. So you'd have. If, if we're just selecting the guys off the bubble. But I think you want some of that two way element. I think Robert Thomas, you could really interchange him. Suzuki Celebrini in that mix. That's a guy I could see. Like the thing is, is that if you bring a Macklin Celebrini for your fourth line, I don't think that's a problem. Like, you know, I think he's actually going to help you. He's going to be a matchups guy. He's going to make things more difficult on the opposing team. I don't think it's too soon for him. Same thing. Suzuki is going to do that same thing for you. Robert Thomas is going to do that same thing for you. I think any of those guys have the versatility to fit into a role. I just think that for me celebrity brings the most of anybody even without that experience. But then Shifely, I think, you know, for him, you know that you've got so many different factors that go for him in terms of where you can put him in the lineup. I think he's a Swiss army knife. In terms of your top nine where you know he can he play with anybody? I do think he could. And then on top of that, you know, as Corey mentioned, the Carter Verheagy factor, the, the, the championship success, the, the, the style of play, everything that he kind of brings to the table, I think you could utilize. And he's another one of those guys where you can kind of put him in a bunch of different situations.

Corey Pronman (21:20)

Am I the only one lost there? On who the three, Chris?

Max Boltman (21:22)

Actually I think it's Verhegi, Scheifele, Celebrini.

Chris Peters (21:25)

Yes, exactly. But I'm saying like the, the, that's the nice thing about where you're at with Team Canada in terms of the depth that you have to select from because basically I just gave you three guys pick. Make it a Pick them. I picked Celebrini. And then you've got your other guys that kind of fit into any variety of role that you kind of need. For me, Scheifele would probably, you know, he wouldn't be on my fourth line. He'd be somewhere in probably on the third line. And then you've got Verhege, who can kind of go wherever you need him to.

Max Boltman (21:55)

All right, Scott, your three.

Scott Wheeler (21:57)

The most interesting part of this debate for me is that I actually think typically when you're picking these last three spots, you. You are laser focused on role and on rounding out your roster. I think in Canada's case, because we've swatted players like Sam Bennett, like Anthony Sorelli, like Brandon Hagel, like Seth Jarvis, potentially like Mark Stone and Brad March, Canada already actually has a lot of players who can do different things, who can play different roles, who can play in your bottom six. And I actually think what's needed here is a little bit more skill. And so for my three, I would probably gravitate towards Suzuki and Thomas. I just think they give you a little more playmaking, a little more feel on the puck than a player like a Zach Hyman does, for example, or that a Cardiver Hagy does, for example. So I think Suzuki and Thomas would be two for me that feel like they should be on the team, like they're less bubble guys and more guys that I would want in this mix with the. With the rest of the collection of players that Team Canada already has penciled in. And then I think I. I go back to where everybody seems to be going back, which is, I think Macklin Celebrini has a legit case to be brought over. A Koneckney or a Hyman or a Scheifely or Verhegi. I just think there's value for now and for the future to getting Macklin Celebrini into this mix. And even if he's your 12th, 13th, 14th forward, I think you feel good about potentially slotting him onto your power play at some point if somebody gets injured or potentially playing him a little higher in your lineup. And you can feel that way about Mark Scheifele or John Tavares or whoever else as well. But Celebrini, I think, just gives you a little bit more juice. And I think it's important that he be there for the future. So I think I'd probably go Suzuki.

Max Boltman (23:34)

Thomas, Celebrini, and I'd be Celebrini, Suzuki, and Zach Hyman, because I think Zach Hyman can score you those dirty goals where it's a big game. You don't know how this puck's going in. He's going to have his stick right around the blue paint. He's played with Connor McDavid. You can play him down your lineup. He can do whatever you need him to do. And I think Suzuki just. It's honestly, Canada has. So to Scott's point, you do not have to pick and choose roles here. You don't have to hunt penalty killers. You don't have to look centers. But I don't think it's ever going to hurt you to have a guy like Nick Suzuki who is that well rounded and can do everything. So to me, those would be my three. Chris's were Verhegi, Scheifele and Celebrini. Scott's were Suzuki, Thomas and Celebrini. Corey, remind me yours again.

Corey Pronman (24:16)

Thomas, Scheifele and Verhegi.

Max Boltman (24:19)

All right, so we do have some good, you know, variability there. Thomas makes it onto multiple. Suzuki makes it onto multiple. Celebrity makes it onto three of the four. So that's the forwards. Now we're doing the same thing with the D, same number of spots, three to decide. We'll do it in the reverse order. Scott, your final three defensemen on Team Canada here.

Scott Wheeler (24:39)

So I'll start with the D that we'd kind of slotted. And we used Canada's orientation camp as the basis for this. But we've been through the top 5D in theory, so we've been through Makar, Morrissey, Harley, Theodore Toews, and then there's sort of this next group vying for the final three spots. We've slotted three players who were on last year's team. Travis Sandheim, Colton Pareco and Drew Doughty. And we've swatted one player who wasn't on last year's team as in that same bubble group, and that's Evan Bouchard. I think there are other players who are in the mix, and I'll be interested to see whether someone, anybody raises them. The other 4D invited to Canada's orientation camp that we haven't discussed were Mackenzie Weiger, Aaron Ekblad, Brandon Montour and Noah Dobson. I don't feel like Ekblad, Montour and Dobson are really in this mix. I think Uyghur is an interesting one because he's very comfortable playing both sides. And the idea of bringing a 7 or 8D who can play the left and right side I think is really compelling. And I think they like Mackenzie Weiger. I would probably go, I think Evan Bouchard belongs on the team. I've made this case on Twitter and on social media and that kind of a thing. But I think Evan Bouchard, even with his warts, belongs on this team. I think he's going to make more plays, go in the other direction and down ice. And offensively, even if he's on your PP2 or even if you want Josh Morrissey on your PP2 and Bouchard's in a third pairing role and just a puck mover, I think the headaches that come with Evan Bouchard and I understand why a coaching staff would get squeamish with him. I think the headaches that come with Evan Bouchard have proven in back to back runs to the Stanley Cup Final to be more than offset by everything else. He adds, I think he's been excellent in back to back playoffs, especially two years ago. Two years ago I thought Evan Bouchard was world class in that playoff run. Last year I just thought he was really good. But Evan Bouchard would be one of them. I just think there's a quality gap between Evan Bouchard and Travis Sandheim, Colton Perako, Drew Doughty at this stage in his career. And I'm going to go with Drew Doughty and Mackenzie Weiger as my last two. I didn't love Sanheim. I'm not convinced that Pareco is sort of up to the task. So Pareco and Sandheim would probably be my cuts and I'd go with Bouchard, the veteran in Doughty and Mackenzie Weger, who I like because he can play both sides.

Max Boltman (26:56)

All right, Chris, I think that goes to you next.

Chris Peters (26:59)

Yeah. You know, as you kind of look through, I think that the, the case to, to have Evan Bouchard on the roster is, is pretty strong. I think you want that power play weapon on your roster. I think that that's a guy that you, you can have now. They have players that, you know, can, can fit into those roles and maybe he's not as established as some of these others. And I think creating the power play units for this team is one of the great problems a coaching staff can have because you have so many great options available to you. But I think Bouchard, to me, is one of those players that, yes, he makes, he does fit what you need. I think that this is a game where the finesse, the puck moving, the ability to get a big shot off and get some traffic in front is all going to help you in this. So I think Bouchard is a guy there. I do think it gets trickier, you know, as you go forward in, in terms of what you would have next. To me, I, you know, I think that Sanheim is an option. I think that he's, you know, he'll, he'll be fine. It's not, you know, I don't think you love it. So I actually am thinking more along the way of, you know, Doughty is kind of the known commodity. So like, for me, I think having a Drew Doughty who has been through the Olympics, who has done this, who has obviously played in the big moments, I do think that he is, is, is, is a better, you know, a better option at that point. And then I'm also on the, the Mackenzie Weger train here just for the reasons that Scott mentioned. Having a guy that can play both sides, not getting so tied up with handedness in terms of different things, like just trying to make sure that you have good options. I think he gives you some good two way capabilities that, you know, certainly a guy that, that does, you know, a little bit of, of everything you need. But again, we talk about this balance and I think like, you know, you look at, when we, when we talk about Team usa, we're going to see a lot of different styles of defensemen. What I think is interesting and you could say, like, you know, Cale McCarr is going to play a ton of minutes, he's going to get, you know, all those opportunities. But you know, how do you insulate him? How do you, how do you make sure that those other shifts are, are valuable? And I think by one, one Bouchard gives you kind of some of that more offensive capability that you, you're going to need, I think at this tournament because when you look at some of the other rosters, they're gonna have a lot of those guys that are quicker, puck moving defensemen and having a bunch of trees doesn't necessarily give you, you know, the best, the best foot forward. But I think for Canada's blue line, I don't think it's a problem. I don't think it's a, I don't think it's a significant weakness. But you know, when you look at that compared to the forwards, it does look quite a bit different. So, yeah, so for me it ends up being, you know, Bouchard, Doughty Weger as well. You know, I, again, I think like Uyghur is one of those guys, he's kind of interchangeable with some of these others. But I think, you know, with Dowdy's experience, Bouchard's offensive capabilities and Uyghurs versatility, that to me is.

Scott Wheeler (29:50)

Is.

Chris Peters (29:50)

Is the best group.

Max Boltman (29:52)

So for me, the way I look at this, and I agree about that, you don't need, you know, you're not going to have this physical blue, you know, type of game that we saw at the four nations.

Scott Wheeler (30:02)

Right.

Max Boltman (30:02)

But I do think Colton Pareco has the size and specifically the length of that this team lacks. I mean, they have some tall guys, but I don't think they combine it with muscle in that way. I think that is the. The play here is to take Colton Preco. I agree you can take Bouchard partly because of the guys that you have higher in the lineup. None of them need the second power play like you. They can all do it, but I don't think any of them need it in the same way. Shea Theodore can do it. Josh Morrissey can do it. Thomas Harley can do it, but I don't think they're going to do it at quite the level. Bouchard would. So I would take Pareco, I would take Evan Bouchard, and then I think I would. I didn't come into this expecting to take Drew Doughty, but I think I kind of have to. I don't think there's anyone who makes an obviously more compelling case than to take this kind of veteran presence who's been there, done that. So I think that's where I land.

Corey Pronman (30:48)

The question with the Bouchard conversation becomes like, I get the power play aspect there for him and the. The skill and the hockey sense and the shot he has. But if you're bringing him, I think one question is, is, is he actually going to be on a power play? Is he actually going to play or is he kind of like your seventh, eighth, which is fine. But then I think you actually. To what Max said earlier, you got to think about who is actually running the second power play. Is it Morrissey? Is it. Is it Theodore or. Or some. Someone else? I think Dowdy stands out as the first one that I bring. I thought even though he's going to be up there in age, and that is a concern for me. And, you know, he wasn't really healthy last year also, but I think he was good enough at the four Nations. He's a very well rounded player and he'd be a guy. I'd be happy to be the six because we've already locked in five. So he's the sixth and then the seventh to Max's points. Earlier, I'd lean Pareco. The size skating, physicality combo is pretty, you know, unique for him, especially among this group. He could be a penalty killer, tough minutes guy, D zone draw guy, limited minutes type of player. And then you get to the eighth, and this gets really tricky here. I, I have some reservations on Sanheim. Kind of what Scott alluded to. They weren't invited, but I look at Jacob Chickpea and I look at Thomas Shabbat, and I almost kind of wonder, like, what can't they do what he does, what. What Uyghur does, and maybe even do it better? I think, you know, I think Shabbat and Chicken are both better skaters than both of those guys. You know, Uyghur. To me, I don't think the skating is good enough to be a team can. Olympic guy. That'd be. I'd have some reservations there. Bouchard skating definitely isn't good enough, but that's the options run thin here. Like, I can't in good conscience bring Aaron Ekblad over Evan Bouchard. So I think I bring Bouchard as the eighth and like, gritting my teeth while I do it, but that'd probably be the way I'd have it there. And. Yeah. And then obviously there's injuries or whatnot. You put him in there, you make him the second power play guy and limit his even. His even strength minutes.

Max Boltman (32:49)

What a horrible punishment, Corey, to have to bring a defenseman who's put up like a point per game for like, three years running to the Olympics. What a horrible grit your teeth kind of situation.

Corey Pronman (32:59)

Like I said, I. I mean, I. Okay, that raises the question. We're all bringing him. Who here has him in the starting six?

Scott Wheeler (33:06)

He'd be in my six.

Max Boltman (33:07)

I think he's running power play, too. Yeah, I think. I think that does fit.

Corey Pronman (33:11)

So then. So you're. So you're benching both Pareco and Dowdy for him.

Max Boltman (33:16)

That's a good point. Do you, do you dress seven, though, in the.

Corey Pronman (33:22)

In, you do dress seven, but you're not. You're not going to roll seven. Be realistic.

Chris Peters (33:28)

Yeah, but that's the thing. When you. Because you roll seven. Because you roll seven. He's. If nothing else, seven. And I do think he is on a power play. I think he's got too good a weapon to not have.

Corey Pronman (33:38)

Well, you can't. You can't dress him enough. Put him on the power play. What's the point of that?

Chris Peters (33:41)

Yeah, well, yeah, exactly. But that's it when you have. When you have the seven slot.

Max Boltman (33:46)

So could you play him, like, eight minutes a night or, you know, eight to 10 minutes in a game?

Corey Pronman (33:50)

You see that, like, World Juniors and stuff like that. Guys do it all the time.

Chris Peters (33:54)

Keel McCarth played like, three minutes at his World Juniors, like, three minutes a game. It was all power play. And he led the team, led defenseman in scoring in the tournament. So, I mean, it happened.

Max Boltman (34:04)

So there's your path.

Corey Pronman (34:05)

So.

Max Boltman (34:05)

So Bouchard and Doughty, both unanimous, by the way, four for four on that. And then it was two for Uyghur and two for Pareco, which I do.

Chris Peters (34:11)

Think is a bit of an indictment of the. Of the depth of the Canadian blue line here, because I do think, like, Doughty being one of your best options, as good as he has been over the course of his career, is not that player. He's not that same player. You're taking him because you want the insurance. And that's the thing where I find it like, it was not a hard decision to have Doughty on this roster for me because of what Corey said. It's like, are you bringing Ekblad over him? Are you bringing Chickren over him? But guys like that. No, you're not. So, yeah. So it's going to be interesting.

Scott Wheeler (34:38)

I think that's also why it's not a hard decision to have Evan Bouchard in that six. Like, I would. I would have Doughty as the seven and. And scratch weaker with the three that I brought. And then Doughty is your guy, where if somebody's struggling, he's someone you can trust to go in and. And sort of slot into whoever's pairing and play a regular shift and whatnot. But I don't think. I don't think there's an easy case to be made that even without the power play that Drew Doughty or Aaron Ekblatt or Mackenzie Weger are having a greater impact on the game than Evan Bouchard.

Max Boltman (35:09)

All right, let's hit the goalies really quick here, Scott, because I think, you know, we don't have another spot to give a goalie, but I think Canada is the country with, I would say, the biggest. Like, Bennington is the starter. I think we've seen that very clearly. But I think you feel the least confident of any of the major nations in Canada's goaltending situation. And we've had, like, no debate about it here.

Scott Wheeler (35:29)

Yeah. And despite the fact that we feel the least confident, Canada clearly doesn't because it's the only position where they just invited, in theory, the three goalies that they have already either put on the roster or that they've put in, if not permanent marker, have put in pen or pencil. Right. They did not bring anybody else. And that orientation camp was not small. And so they chose to take their three, including Sam Montambau, who still has, by all measures, a lesser track record than a Darcy Kemper or a Logan Thompson, some of the other goalies that are available to them. So I thought that was telling. Like, they seem committed to Jordan Binnington, Aiden Hill, and Sam Montambo, and that surprised me. And maybe that's because they got the job done and they know that Binnington's the guy and they were happy with the role that Aiden Hill and Sam Montumbault played as basically practice goalies for them at the Four Nations. But if Logan Thompson or Darcy Kemper or Mackenzie Blackwood in Colorado, if they're playing well, I don't see. And Sam Montambau and the Montreal Canadiens struggle and regress maybe a little bit this season, which I think is a very real possibility for the Montreal Canadiens. And for Montambo, I don't see why they wouldn't have brought more goalies to the orientation camp. Just in case something does go wrong with this shallow pool of goalies and one of them does really struggle, it feels like they've handicapped themselves a little bit. Now, the orientation camp does not mean that those players aren't on their list, but they also have a list that they have to submit on October 15th here, which I believe is 42 players. And I don't know the cap on goalies for that list, but if they lock those three in and Thompson, Kemper and Blackwood aren't on that list on October 15, which won't have included much regular season hockey, then they have no choice but to run with those guys, barring injury. So I did think that was interesting. Like, I view Thompson, Kemper and Blackwood as comparable goalies to Aiden Hill and Sam Montambo.

Max Boltman (37:22)

No, I think so, yeah. I mean, I just. I think you don't feel that amazing about any of it.

Scott Wheeler (37:27)

Right?

Max Boltman (37:27)

It's just kind of all one big group. And to your point, they may have tipped their hand. Let's wrap there for Team Canada. We're gonna take another quick break. We're gonna come back and get to Team usa, which I have a feeling is going to be a battle.

Capital One Bank Guy (37:43)

Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One Bank Guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too. Ah, really? Thanks Capital One Bank Guy. What's in your wallet? Terms apply See capitalone.com bank Capital One.

Chris Peters (38:07)

NA member FDIC Pura brings smart fragrance and function together.

Max Boltman (38:13)

Premium scents, smart app control and sleek design. And here's the best part. Your first set of fragrances is free. Hurry to pura.com now and upgrade your home today.

Chris Peters (38:24)

Hey, it's Maya and Sim from the Girls that Invest podcast.

Max Boltman (38:27)

If you are an IT or security.

Chris Peters (38:29)

Pro, you know managing devices, identities and applications can feel overwhelming and honestly risky. That's where Trelica by1Password comes in. It helps conquer SaaS sprawl and shadow it by discovering every app your team uses, managed or not.

Max Boltman (38:46)

With pre built app profiles, you can.

Chris Peters (38:48)

Assess risk, manage access, and even optimize your software spend. Plus it simplifies onboarding, offboarding and compliance, all while cutting costs by eliminating unused licenses. Take the first step to better security for your team. Learn more at 1Password.com special offer.

Scott Wheeler (39:14)

All.

Max Boltman (39:14)

Right, we're back and let's bring it home today with Team usa. This might honestly be the better debates of the entire episode here, so we're going to do it all at once here in this segment. Corey, you put this one together. Why don't you read us your locks for Team usa.

Corey Pronman (39:28)

Say the forwards, who I think are, you know, nearly guarantees to make the team, presuming they're healthy, would be the Kachuk brothers, Brady and Matthew Tkachuk, Austin Matthews, Jack Eichel, Jack Hughes. And even though I don't think his offense is as dynamic as those guys, I think Dylan Larkin's for sure to make this team. If he's healthy just because of all the qualities he brings to a hockey team. Then the blue line. It was hard to differentiate the blue line between the locks and the quote unquote front runners. With the categories that we use, I think there's a lot of guys who are really good and seem almost assured to make this team. But the four guys who I put as 100 to make this team would have been Quinn Hughes, Zacharyski, Charlie McAvoy and Jacob Slevin. And then the goalie would be, you know, the reigning Vesna winner, Conor Hellebuk, Dylan Larkin.

Max Boltman (40:16)

And a lock I think is a little interesting. I. I don't know that I fundamentally disagree, but I think you could have also. I mean, I think I expected him in front runners more so than Locke, but I don't necessarily disagree.

Corey Pronman (40:28)

I just think the, the speed, size, compete, offense combination he brings. Like I said, he's not going to be in the top six, but he's on the team. That's kind of how I view this.

Max Boltman (40:38)

And he was excellent against Canada in both games at the Four Nations. I think that's going to count for a lot. You know, it's not just that he was on the team. He was one of their most impactful players in those most important games of the Four Nations. So anyone have any qualms with the loss before we go to the front runners here?

Scott Wheeler (40:52)

When Corey was putting this together and I opened up the document after he said that he was done with it, I was not expecting to see Dylan Larkin there. And then as soon as I did, I sort of thought, yeah, you know what? I think that checks out. He was so good at the Four nations, and I think him just being a captain in the league, the way that he skates, his ability to play different roles, I think Larkin is the only debate there, really. I mean, I know Jack Hughes has been a bit of a mixed bag in playoffs and, and with. With USA Hockey at the men's level, but I think Jack's there as well. So I, I have, I have no issues.

Max Boltman (41:29)

All right. The players Corey has identified as the front runners for this roster are. And this is the guys that we think have like an 80, 90% chance of being on this team. Matt Boldy, Jake Gensel, J.T. miller at forward on D. Brock Faber, Jake Sanderson, Seth Jones, goalie Jake Ottinger. I know the name that we're going to spend the most time on in this segment here, But I think J.T. miller stands out as well as a guy who I think is bubble for me, but I do think probably ultimately gets the nod onto the team.

Scott Wheeler (42:01)

Yeah, I'd probably have J.T. miller and Seth Jones more bubble than, than front runners for me. I know Seth had a really nice rejuvenation in Florida, but I still think he's got to prove at least that he's still among the elite of the elite in the league. Especially on a blue line that says loaded as the. The American group is.

Max Boltman (42:19)

Well, that's the one we're going to spend the most time on. So why don't you just take us right into it, Scott? Seth Jones.

Scott Wheeler (42:24)

Yeah, it had been like, let's all, let's all not forget it was. And it was a bad team in Chicago, but he was not at his best there and didn't play well there for a couple of seasons. And now we've seen him play well for a very short stint with a very strong team in Florida. And I think in both cases the the team is probably not telling the true story. The Blackhawks were probably not telling the true story of how far he'd fallen. And I think in Florida the same is true where he benefited from playing with very good players all of a sudden and he looked more like himself. And I think that's positive and I think he's absolutely belongs in the mix. But when I think of seth Jones of October 6, 2025, I just don't place him in the same category as a Jake Sanderson or a Brock Faber or an Adam Fox. And I'm sure we'll get to the Fox. Deb. I would sooner have Adam Fox all day long on my team over Seth Jones. Based off what we've seen over the last two or three years now, if Seth plays lights out in the fall, I think he's in the mix. He's obviously someone that USA Hockey is very familiar with. All of those things matter. I think he is among the 10 or 11 players who are vying for the 8D that they're going to take. But he feels more at the fringes for me than firmly in the mix.

Max Boltman (43:43)

Corey, why don't you give the positive case here for Seth Jones being in this category?

Corey Pronman (43:47)

I'll be curious to hear what Chris says because I know both him and I have been major Seth Jones fans for a long time. And I get listen, he wasn't even in the mix for the, for the February team. So some might wonder like, well, did it was there really enough new information here to get him to the front runner status for the team the following February? And I think he did for two big reasons. One, the second, this is still a player with a ton of traits like this is he didn't just come out of nowhere and have have a great spring. This has always been an extremely gifted player. Great skater, great length, great hockey sense, does a lot of things really well. And so, you know, there's already a, you know, a really good foundation there, even if he wasn't executing at a high level in Chicago. And then we get to the, to the when he gets to Florida and talk about the playoff run, I don't think it was he was ratted by a good team. I think he was a reason they were a good team for me he was one of the two, three, four best players for them every single time I watched that team in the playoffs. He was a really impactful defenseman and I don't see how you can't watch what he did, not just over a couple of games, but over a period of months there in Florida and not conclude that he's one of the better defensemen in the NHL, that he should be in the mix to be on this team. I think he absolutely has the traits to, you know, we talk about where he's in fitness, a lot of he's not going to be a top four guy. You're talking about like a third pair, pimp killing type of guy for this team. This USA Blue line so loaded that I think he will, he would excel in like that 5, 6, 7 type of role for this team.

Max Boltman (45:17)

Chris, what do you think?

Chris Peters (45:18)

Yeah, you know, I'd say like, I think that the first half of the season is going to loom very largely for Seth Jones because now he needs to put it together after, you know, having the full off season and, and now you got to ramp it back up, up for this, for this Panthers team. And that will be ultimately if he makes it or doesn't make it more so than what we saw. But to Corey's point, what we saw over the course of the playoffs was the Seth Jones that I think a lot of us believed. Well, not, maybe not a lot of us, but those of us that have been following his career since he was a prospect, there are dozens there, there, there are literally, literally dozens that saw that type of defenseman in him. A guy that could be relied upon in all situations, a guy that could be playing significant minutes in tough matchups. That is ultimately what we thought he could be. He had in sit. Whether, you know, you can say it was his fault or not, the situations he was in over the years never really allowed us to see that full component. So now you put him in a team full of elite players and now you've got what we saw. So I do think that there's, there's in the mix. The interesting thing is it's not because I don't think it's the Adam Fox discussion that is, is, is as tied to Seth Jones as it is just simply to Adam Fox. And I think even Mike Sullivan has said now publicly that there needs to be some fight figuring things out for Adam Fox to be in the mix for the Olympics. He's not just giving him a spot. And that's going to be a really interesting debate about how they build this team because as we talked about the, the, you know, making sure that you have a team that can play, you know, that faster paced style. Adam Fox thinks the game very quickly. He doesn't necessarily play it very quickly. And I do think that guys with. And if you're going to be that size and, and, and like that's going to be a, a part of it. He didn't look good at the four Nations. Like it wasn't, it wasn't just that like he looked outside of himself at the four nations. I felt like, and this is a player that I really like too, but that's going to be an absolute discussion. I think to me, Brock Faber is already a lock for that team. I think Jake Sanderson should be a lock for that team as well. My locks would be probably more aggressive in terms of who's there. I have no problem with these guys being front runners. But the Seth Jones discussion is a real one and I think it's one that USA Hockey is having. And you know, as much as we talk about like the USA Hockey Hockey Canada of it all, Bill Guerin is very much driving the bus on these decisions and he's doing it in tandem with Mike Sullivan. Mike Sullivan is going to have as much of a say in what this roster looks like as anybody else. And so that does make it interesting in the whole kind of discussion about what's this ultimately going to mean for Adam Fox. He's going to have, you know, it might actually be not beneficiary for Adam Fox to be under. Mike Sullivan's watching every single shift of his game because he will be nitpicked in a way that no other player is. But if you look at, if Seth Jones just sends Mike Sullivan that highlight tape from the Stanley cup playoffs this year, he's going to see a guy like, if he, if you can deliver that on the Olympic stage, that makes our D core better.

Corey Pronman (48:36)

Well, I think it's a little different between the Fox debate with USA and Evan Bouchard with Canada is, I think if you said, well, we need Bouchard to run our second powerful unit, he's like, yeah, like I could see that. Like, we love Morrissey, we love Shea Theodore, but we love Thomas Harley. But Bouchard will do it at a different level with Team usa. You have Quinn, Hughes and Zachary, and I'm not convinced Adam Fox runs the power play better than either of them. So then you really ask, well, what is he really providing to our starting six, starting seven at this point? And Keep in mind that Hughes was injured at the Four Nations.

Max Boltman (49:08)

We got to decide is, is Seth Jones in this group that we're taking here? So Chris, break the tie. Seth Jones, like are we putting him on or is he in this bubble group that we're going to debate between?

Chris Peters (49:18)

I, I, I, I, as much as I love him, I will put him in the bubble group for, for now because I do think that this is the, the question is yet to be answered about Seth Jones because the first half will loom large for players like him.

Max Boltman (49:30)

Okay then, Scott, take us right in and you can go ahead and give us your first bubble answer. We'll start with the D this time.

Corey Pronman (49:35)

Time.

Scott Wheeler (49:36)

Yeah, I'm going to start with Adam Fox. I think the conversation around Adam Fox over the last, whatever it is, six months since the Four nations has kind of divorced itself from the reality of what Adam Fox has accomplished to date. So I've actually got, got some notes and I'm going to read off some notes. I don't do this very often, but I'm going to read off some notes. He has in four playoff runs never been outscored in a playoff series. At five on five, the goals four and goals against are 36 to 24 across. Huge minutes. We're talking 20 minutes a night. 36 to 24. That's 60%. Six seasons in the league, he's been a top five finalist for the Norris Trophy in four of his six seasons in the league. Last year in his so called down year finished 12th in Norris voting coming off a serious knee injury last year he was playing with Ryan Lindgren Last year. This is all, all well known since these, these are the more important ones. Forget the production. He's fifth among all defensemen in the league. Since he entered the league in points, he's played at a 70 point pace across 82 games for his career. He's also, and this is the most important part when we talk about 5 on 5 and what he's adding to a team. He is fifth in total goal differential in the NHL among defensemen at 5 on 5 since entering the league. He is plus 117. The names ahead of him are Cale Makar, who's obviously a singular player. The next three names, the only three names other than Kale Makar that are ahead of him are the agreed upon better defenders on the planet. Gustav Forsling, Jacob Slavin, Devin Toews. So we've got lap five on five. He is in elite company in the NHL in terms of play driving. I just Think that because of the missed handoff on the McDavid goal, because of the goal against that he got burned on in the previous game at Four nations and because of the way that his role shrunk in that tournament and because he's not the biggest guy.

Corey Pronman (51:29)

And slow, sort of.

Scott Wheeler (51:30)

We've sort of forgot. It doesn't. Whether he's slow or not does not matter to the impact that is, that can be measured and that he has performed at level over the course of his NHL career. It matters in terms of the way that he's talked about and the ways that he can be better and the ways that he needs to be better. And it sounds like he's been in the gym this year and this summer and he's super dedicated to improving in that area. But I imagine a lot of players.

Corey Pronman (51:59)

Were in the gym this summer.

Scott Wheeler (52:00)

Yes, but the impact has been just flat out better than the other players who are considered quote unquote, bubble guys for this team. Like he is just better at hockey. These things to a certain degree are measurable. He has performed at a world class level for six. He's only been in the league for six years and he has been for all six of those years one of the very best players in the world, including last year with Ryan Lindgren coming off of knee surgery, et cetera. I think the definite, the Adam Fox that we're going to see in the first half of this season is going to put this to bed and he's going to be on Mike Sullivan's team.

Corey Pronman (52:36)

In what role?

Scott Wheeler (52:38)

In whatever role you want to pair him, whoever you want to play him with. Whether it's third pair, PP2. I would have him running PP2 over Zach Horinski. As great as Zach was last year. I think Adam Fox is just a more cerebral, more intelligent player at the top of the umbrella with the puck on his stick and thinks the game at a higher level. I think Adam Fox thinks the game at a higher level than just about anybo. I think you can run your second power play and I think he can play a regular shift at 5 on 5. Whether that says your 5, 6, 7, whatever defenseman, I think he's. I think he belongs on that team.

Max Boltman (53:14)

Here's a question. So we talked on the Hockey Show Monday about the jets and I was saying the jets and the Rangers to me are more similar than anyone really wants to admit in their roster construction. And as I was breaking it down, I'm going, you know, Shusturkin and Haliba and some of the way their forwards are grouped and Morrissey and Fox I think are. Are probably in a tier. I think I'd prefer Morrissey as a player, but they'd probably be at least in a tier.

Chris Peters (53:37)

Right.

Max Boltman (53:38)

Morrissey's a lock for Team Canada and we're talking about Fox as a bubble guy for Team usa. And yet I do think that's a legit. I don't even know that I would take Fox on my bubble because the difference between them in this context and Scott's stats are all really good, really helpful information. But they are against NHL players and NHL teams in a spread out talent pool versus at this. It's super concentrated of the best players in the world and. And you're kind of within the confines of your team. Whereas Morrissey I don't think needs one of your two power plays to really be impacting the game. I do think Fox does need that at least to maximize him.

Corey Pronman (54:12)

Right.

Max Boltman (54:12)

Like, it's not that I'm saying Adam Fox will ruin the Olympics for you if he's on your team.

Corey Pronman (54:16)

I don't think you could put Rowinski and Fox on the second power play together though.

Max Boltman (54:20)

You could.

Scott Wheeler (54:21)

They're also in the context. And sure, it's not the Olympics. They're in the context of the Stanley cup playoffs. Adam Fox has played deeper into the Stanley cup playoffs than Jake Sanderson, than Brock Faber. Now those guys are playing different roles and Faber, I agree with Chris belongs on this team. I thought him and Slavin made a great pair and should make a great matchup pair again. But. But we only talk about these things with Adam Fox. We talk about the, this whatever it is spread out across. We're not talking about. We're not discounting Jake Sanderson or Brock Faber because they haven't been on a deep playoff run. And yet we're saying that Adam Fox has issues at this level because he had a couple of bad games at the Four Nations. Right. Like, I think that part of it just feels like it has taken on a bit of a life of its own to me.

Max Boltman (55:06)

If you are McDavid or McKinnon and you're coming down the ice on a two on one, two on two, let's say two on two. Would you rather one of the defensemen that you're going up against be Seth Jones or Adam Fox?

Scott Wheeler (55:17)

I would rather not go against the defenseman that is likely to outscore me 36 to 24 in the playoffs at 5 on 5, which is Adam Fox and not Seth Jones.

Corey Pronman (55:26)

You kind of dodged that question right there.

Max Boltman (55:28)

Hey, Scott's ready for a senate run is what I just learned in that answer. That was deft. That was deft. Chris, what do you think on this one?

Scott Wheeler (55:34)

Seth Jones, forget coming down on me. Adam Fox is going to beat me back the other way as well. Like, it's, it's not just about defending.

Corey Pronman (55:42)

McDavid back the other way.

Scott Wheeler (55:45)

He's going to beat me in a game of five on five ice hockey. He has proven that he will beat me on the ice at 5 on 5 across six seasons in the NHL and across four playoff runs.

Chris Peters (55:59)

So here's the thing. Like, I know that we don't want, you know, we don't want to use small sample sizes too much here, but I think the four na, the four nations thing does loom large because he was overmatched in that in a way that I've never seen. And I will grant you, I think he's one of the most intelligent players. I think he is far better defensively than he's ever given credit for because of his anticipation ability. He actually guard, he's really good at defending. Odd man rushes. In terms of how the space that he's able to take away and angles, I think he thinks the game at an incredibly high level. But I do think that in this concentrated area in this, this, this game where a lot of these micro battles are going to be what decides the game. Like, the margins are so thin between the US And Canada in this event, that one bad shift can be the difference in a game between these two teams. And that's where I think, like getting a level of comfort with him in the pace of this, of this tournament is where it is now. I'm not saying that he's not gonna make the team because I think really, like we're saying he's on the bubble, which means he's still in the mix. It's not as strong in the mix.

Max Boltman (57:12)

Yeah, we all get two here. We all get two.

Corey Pronman (57:14)

I think he's probably on the team despite everything I'm saying right now.

Chris Peters (57:17)

Yeah, exactly. Like that's the thing. There are eight defensemen taken. You can't convince me that there are seven better, you know, or eight better than him, you know, like, I, I, there's no way. And I do think that you need to have them at worst as insurance for if the power play goes south or anything like that. If you do have Warrenski running or maybe you have both of them on, on PP2, whatever you end up doing. But he is still that player. The question I think is, you know, where do you, where do you slot him? And all those five on five numbers are super important. But again, like, like, how much is he going to play 5 on 5 for this team ultimately? Now Mike Sullivan may get a better picture of that with the Rangers with the amount of that he's going to have to play for that team. And I think that's good too. But I do think that, you know, in terms of the way that USA wants to play, and this is another important fact, the way that they want to play, he isn't as adept to playing that style as what the rest of those guys are. And that's where I think Mike Sullivan is going to have some qualms about who they're going to put there. But again, like these are the discussions that we have at the Olympics because we're talking about a Norris Trophy winning defenseman. We're talking about one of the most productive defensemen over the NHL in the last five years. This is, this is absolutely one of the best players in the league. But these, these, the, the margins is where the games will be won and lost and things like skating and things like size and other things will become part of that discussion when Bill Garon and Mike Sullivan and the, and the decision makers make those decisions. And they will probably be looking at a lot of that tape from the four nations.

Scott Wheeler (59:03)

But again, did we all not watch Seth just watch Seth Jones get walked for two years in Chicago off the rush? Like why, why are we any more convinced that, that in the margins against the best players in the world against Connor McDavid, that, that a player like Seth Jones or whoever's next on your list for Noah Hannifin or whoever's next on your list for, for the American. Like, I don't, I don't know that I'm more convinced that those players aren't going to make a mistake or also get burned playing against Connor McDavid and Mitch Marner and Nathan McKinnon. Like, I don't know that any of those guys are equipped to play serious minutes for this USA team.

Corey Pronman (59:40)

Anyways, I think we all agree that AV Fox is going to be world smarter. You know, massive difference between his puck play and whoever else we're talking about. Like there, there's no conversation there. We have the 5D that we've all. Sorry, where 5 or 6D that we've all kind of established there. So it's Hughes, McAvoy, Slavin, Orinsky, Faber, Sanderson. So first question, does anybody here Thinks Fox is in the starting season six over any of those players.

Scott Wheeler (60:10)

I do not over any of Those. Those main five.

Corey Pronman (60:15)

Six.

Max Boltman (60:17)

Faber, Sanderson, McEvoy, Warrensky, Slavon Hughes and Hughes.

Chris Peters (60:23)

Yeah. No, no, with.

Scott Wheeler (60:25)

With Hughes healthy. No.

Corey Pronman (60:27)

So we're talking about the seventh defenseman right now. Yeah.

Chris Peters (60:31)

It's an important place. It's in a margins, baby. You need that. I get it.

Corey Pronman (60:35)

I'm just.

Scott Wheeler (60:36)

I could, like, I could see a scenario where Jake Sanderson has an off night and he's not in. Not in my six kind of thing like Jake would be. Jake would be the six there for me.

Corey Pronman (60:48)

Right. Guess my question is anybody taking any of those six out to put Fox in?

Max Boltman (60:52)

I am not.

Chris Peters (60:54)

No.

Max Boltman (60:56)

Scott saying he could see a world where he.

Scott Wheeler (60:58)

Yeah, I could see a world where Sanderson isn't in that six for me. Come.

Max Boltman (61:02)

Come December, we got to get to the forwards here. So just real quick, who. Who's. Everyone's two. We got two spots here.

Scott Wheeler (61:08)

Is it.

Max Boltman (61:08)

Is it Fox Jones universally or is anyone dissenting there?

Corey Pronman (61:13)

I think it's Fox Jones for me. And then I. But I am keeping an eye on Hannifin and the other guy I'm really keeping an eye on after his world championships is Jackson Lacombe. I think he is probably more in that conversation than the average person reading hockey content would be aware of. I think they are really high on him and I think if he has a really good first half, I think he's in the starting eight.

Max Boltman (61:38)

All right, so that's the defenseman. We got a lot of forwards to get to in a very small amount of time here. So let me just read you the guys that we have highlighted that Corey put together on the bubble and the dark horse categories. And if you want to throw in a long shot, we got five names everyone's got to get to.

Corey Pronman (61:53)

And I think we're kind of including J.T. miller in there now. Right, Right. I think you got what you guys wanted to do.

Max Boltman (61:58)

All right, so. So let's bump. He's. I think he's going to end up in it just looking at this thing. So I'm fine to leave him in front runners. Just the more I look at this bubble.

Corey Pronman (62:05)

So. So we have nine forwards then we need to take.

Max Boltman (62:08)

We need five, four, then 14 and eight.

Chris Peters (62:11)

Right?

Corey Pronman (62:12)

Yeah, yeah, sorry.

Max Boltman (62:13)

Yeah.

Corey Pronman (62:13)

Five.

Chris Peters (62:14)

Five.

Max Boltman (62:14)

All right, so we got. So here's the names we're choosing from. It's Logan Cooley, Kyle Conner, Clayton Keller, Patrick Kane, Matthew Nyes, Brock Nelson, Jason Robertson, Tage Thompson, Vincent Trocheck, Cole Caufield, Shane Pinto. I think this is kind of our pool, but feel free. You know, I know Matty Benir is. Ryan Leonard, Frank Nazer, Brian Rust, Alex Tuck, all also would be in that pool. So five names. Corey, go ahead. Who's your five?

Corey Pronman (62:45)

I'm kind of envisioning a fourth line with Logan Cooley in between Brock Nelson. And I would. Would have gone in between Nice and Trocheck. I might lean towards Trocheck just. Just for the experience there. I could really go either way there. I'll lean towards Nice, but it'd be really close. Then for the 14th forward, I think Tage. Todd Thompson. Not the 14th, the 13th forward. Sorry. I think Tage Thompson is an ideal 13th forward with all the tools and traits he brings to the table, the size, the skating, the skill. I think that that'd be really appealing. And then for the 14th, I probably should have flipped these guys, but. But Kyle Connor would be in there. You know, I know he didn't have a great tournament in February, but he's still a dynamic player and. And he should be on this team.

Max Boltman (63:40)

All right, Scott, who's your five?

Scott Wheeler (63:42)

I'm going to include J.T. miller, but I'm not sure he would be the very next name on my list. Like, he might be more of a 13th or 14th forward for me, but I think he is on this team. And then I'm going Logan Cooley, Kyle Conner, Clayton Keller, and Tage Thompson. I know three of those names skew a little bit smaller, but between Tage, even Eichel, Larkin Matthews, the Tkachuk brothers. Like, I don't think Matt Boldy. I know he doesn't play that way. J.T. miller, like, they've got enough size. I think Cooley's going. We've talked about it on the pod a little bit already. I think Cooley goes nuclear this year. Like, I think he's one of the breakout candidates in the league for me this season. I think he's going to have a massive year, play his way onto this team. I agree with Corey, Kyle Conner and his offense, whether he's playing for you in every single game or not. Despite his struggles at Four nations last year, I think Kyle's talent. I believe he's tied with Austin or a couple of goals behind Austin over the last five years. For goals by American forwards ahead of.

Max Boltman (64:39)

Of.

Scott Wheeler (64:39)

Ahead of the Tachuks and all of these guys ahead of Eichel. I think Kyle's on the team, and I think I like the way that Clayton Keller's game has really developed here and I think he's more than just a playmaking winger now. I like his play off the puck. I think he belongs in this group. And they clearly feel like. I think coming out of men's worlds, I think it showed that they clearly like him and they feel like they can trust him. So I think I'd go Cooley, Connor, Keller, Tage and J.T. miller as those five.

Max Boltman (65:09)

Miller was in our nine, so you get one more.

Scott Wheeler (65:12)

Okay. See this is maybe Trocheck as the next guy. Like, I just don't think, I don't think Nelson's there anymore. I think we saw that last year. I don't think Brock's there anymore. I don't love Jason Robertson as a fit for this team. I just think unless he's playing in an offensive role, he doesn't add a ton of. And I don't think nice, I don't think nice is there. So I, I'd maybe go Trocheck.

Max Boltman (65:38)

All right, Chris, who you got? Who's your five?

Chris Peters (65:40)

Yeah, my. This is, this is a tough, this is a tough one too because I think that as I look at this roster and I'm starting to try to like plot out roles, I feel like in the, in the case of, of Canada, we had a lot of guys that fit certain roles or could fit a lot of different roles. In USA's case, they've got a lot of high octane offensive players. More where, you know, you've got your guys like that we already have on the roster, like a Larkin, like Miller, like Boldy, that I think are going to give you some good two way capabilities. But yeah, I mean I think that that's where it gets a little bit tougher for me. But I said, well if that's what the player pool gives you, lean into it. So I've got Kyle Conner in there. I just think the goal scoring is too, too much of a factor. Clayton Keller is absolutely in the mix there as a guy that you want to have on your team. I think that he makes, makes a lot of plays and I think that you know, him getting the captaincy, like I think of, of the players that did not make the four nations team, I think he was one of the guys that really was the most upset by it. And then comes back, goes to Worlds, where's the Sea, leads him to the gold medal. I think that that's a guy that you're bringing, Tage Thompson. I think that his, his fate was sealed in at the World Championships as well. Also the fact that you get a big, big forward, a guy that can play a little bit all over the lineup, you can find ways for him to make an impact in the game. So I've got Connor, Keller Thompson, I think that means you also got to bring, you know, I think Logan Cooley is another guy where he's probably my 14th forward. He's a guy that I think that you can have in the mix as a, as a player that can slot around your lineup and give you that speed factor, play at the pace that you want to. And I've got one more right. I'm, I've got one more so far.

Corey Pronman (67:23)

Yep.

Chris Peters (67:23)

Yeah. And this is, this is where, you know, I, I, I debated, I think Brock Nelson has been one of the great soldiers of USA Hockey over the years where he, he's, he's such a good two way player, he does so many things well. But I think I want to skew younger here and I'm actually going to go with Matthew Nyes. I think the guy, the size factor that he brings that there's some, you know, you can get a little more power out of your lineup. I can see him playing on the line with some other big players that come could potentially, you know, make things a little bit more difficult on Canada's blue line when you're playing Team Canada because as we assume that there's going to be a collision course between these two teams and that's ultimately who you're building the team for. I think that, you know, this US Team that we have collectively and what, what we have now is it's faster. And again, like, like Scott said, we're leaving out Jason Robertson, who is a guy that I think a lot of us figured would be a lock for these types of national team. The pace of the game is really the difference maker there and he is not somebody that plays at the pace that the Olympics are going to be played at. And that's why it's, you know, it's really that to me that's the biggest reason that you leave him out. Even though I think he's one of the smart players, really processes the game at a tremendous speed, just doesn't play it at the, at the pace I think USA is going to need to play at.

Corey Pronman (68:35)

I do think they are going to bring one of Nelson or Trocheck because I think that's true. Canada, because you're going to need a fourth line center. You need a guy who can play D zone draws, who can kill penalties, who can you know, out muscle guys and all those, you know, those young players or smaller players are going to have. Even though Trojax on a little. On the smaller side, he's, he's sturdy. Like there's, I can't see them not bringing one of those two guys on this team. Just for very specific situational usage.

Chris Peters (69:04)

Yeah, that's a, that's a really good call out because like, yeah, as I look, it's just like the, the, the roles of the team. It's like who, you know, how, how much, how much of the defensive matchups are you giving to Dylan Larkins parking all the time. If, if he's the only guy like that. So then you, yeah, you probably do end up bringing a Larson or a Nelson.

Scott Wheeler (69:21)

I could see Austin in a, in that kind of a role as well.

Chris Peters (69:25)

And he's gonna have to play in that way.

Scott Wheeler (69:26)

Yeah, he's gonna have to PK and. Yeah.

Max Boltman (69:30)

All right. So mine would be Tage Thompson, Kyle Connor. I agree about Nies. I'll take trocheck between those two. The one that I'm hemming and hawing over is Logan Cooley versus Patrick Kane. And I think the future minded angle that we've talked about with Celebrini would certainly lead you to Cooley. But I look at this USA team and Austin Matthews wore the seat for them at the Four Nations. But doesn't it feel like when you look at this player pool that the guy who screams out captain of this group is Patrick Kane? I mean, he is Mr. USA. He's been there, done that. All these guys grew up idolizing him. He has to have a really good first half to make this team. And I don't know if that's going to happen. But he is the one that, that if I had to guess, I bet USA Hockey is rooting for him to do that.

Chris Peters (70:10)

They might be. He's certainly the most of those guys idol, you know, in terms of that he's, he's really set. Why is this team so skilled that Patrick Kane birthed a generation of, of skill players in the US And I think for me it's, it's, it's a tough sell just because of the pace and, and he's not at the same pace that he was as, as a younger man. I, you know, I think I'd be intrigued by it. I'm sure I agree with you. They're probably rooting for it. I just think that now they're at a stage where there can't be a nostalgic like it feels too much like a nostalgia pick. And I know if like Patrick Kane is going to use that as fuel, he wants to play.

Max Boltman (70:51)

He looks really good this preseason.

Chris Peters (70:53)

Yeah. And let's see, let's see where like again, the first half is going to loom super large on those last decisions, so it's not out of the realm.

Scott Wheeler (71:01)

Of possibility on the pace note and he's not going to be on this team, but on the pace note. I thought it was awesome that they invited Frank Nazar to the orientation camp after the way that he played at men's Worlds and it's just preseason hockey, but boy, oh boy, has preseason hockey. Frank Nazar looked really good again here. So I'm, I'm just fascinated to see what he, he does in the next next few months here.

Max Boltman (71:28)

We are short for time here, so I can't ask you all for your last goalie. So congratulations, Jeremy Swayman. You get it by default. That is going to do it for us on this episode of the Athletic Hockey Show. You can catch more of Chris over at Flow Hockey on his podcast called Up. We'll talk to you soon.

Scott Wheeler (71:48)

Imagine the merging of trusted intelligence into a unified experience. Imagine collaboration among amongst teams and across continents. Imagine an empowered ecosystem designed to deliver actionable insights that inspire growth and sustainability. That's the power of the Connect Industrial Intelligence platform to help you see further, innovate faster, accomplish more.

Chris Peters (72:12)

That's the Connect effect.

Capital One Bank Guy (72:14)

Learn more@thatsteconnecteffect.com banking with capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One bank guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too. Ah, really? Thanks. Capital One Bank Guy. What's in your wallet? Term supply See capitalone.com bank Capital One.

Chris Peters (72:42)

NA member FDIC Pura brings smart fragrance and function together.

Max Boltman (72:48)

Premium sense, smart app control and sleek design. And here's the best part. Your first set of fragrances is free. Hurry to pura.com now and upgrade your home today.