Loading summary
A
Foreign.
B
This is the athletic hockey show.
C
Hey, everybody, I'm Max Boltman alongside Jesse Granger and Mark Lazarus for another episode of the Athletic Hockey Show. And Laz, I sure am glad that podcast hosts have more job security than NHL head coaches, because with four games left, just after we had talked about how wild it was that John Tortorella replaced Bruce Cassidy in Vegas with, I believe that was eight games left, the Islanders said, hold my beer. And they have fired Patrick Wa. They are replacing him with just four games left in the season with Pete DeBoer. This is a. If the Vegas one was a surprise, this is a shocker.
B
I mean, it's. It's sheer desperation, right? You lose a few games in a row, you start falling out of the playoffs, and you panic. I don't know what's a bigger panic move, doing this with four games left in the season or when you see a coach get fired four games into a season, which we've seen many times. The NHL, where there's a guy waiting in the wings and the team clearly is looking for an excuse to move a guy out and hire the new guy. That's kind of where this is. It's like the Islanders saw, like, all right, a, weird. We need help here. We need something to get some life into this team. This is getting bad, and we're going to miss the playoffs in a year that we could have it in a, wide open east. And B, we don't want to get stuck with our, you know, our pants around our ankles. We want to get Pete the board now before everyone else has a chance at him. So the Islanders make this desperation move, and I can't honestly tell you it's not the right one. I feel like they had to do something. This is drastic, but it feels like it might be the smart thing to do, doesn't it?
A
I view this one very, very different from the Vegas coaching move, because I think the second thing you said is what's actually happening here is that Pete DeBoer was going to get a job and the Islanders thought Pete DeBoer is an upgrade over Patrick Waugh, and you can argue with that. To me, that's pretty clear. I think Patrick was a good coach. I think Pete DeBoer is a great hockey coach, and all he does is win. They were going to miss out on Pete DeBoer unless they did it right now, and now they're.
C
They.
A
They. You couldn't fire Wall on a win streak as he's leading you to the playoffs. So what is it? A four Game losing streak that they fall on. It gives you a reason. And, and I, I don't see his panic move. Whereas the Vegas move I see as John Tortorell is a good coach, Bruce Cassidy is a great hockey coach. I think the Golden Knights downgraded at coach in order to try to spark their team for a run this year. It's. To me the situations are very, very different despite being last minute coaching changes for teams fighting for the playoffs.
B
Well, yeah, you look at it like Pete DeBoer has been in the conference final six of the last eight years. This is a guy who's had a job as a head coach in the NHL for 19 consecutive seasons despite being fired five times. That's how well regarded he is. That's the kind of impact he has. Tortorella hasn't done squats since winning the Stanley Cup 22 years ago. This is Tortorella's last 10 seasons. I was just looking this up before we went on the air. Missed playoff, missed playoff, lost in round one. Lost in round one, lost around two. Lost in round one. Missed playoffs, missed playoffs, missed playoffs, fired. That is not an upgrade. You're right. Pete DeBoer wins. Pete DeBoer has not won the Stanley cup, but he gets teams into the playoffs. He structures them well. He fixes problems and he gets them to make runs. He wins playoff series. And that's something the Islanders are looking for right now.
C
Just to kind of flesh out both of your points about jumping the line, right. As of right now, every team in the NHL has a head coach two weeks from today or less than two weeks from today. That will not be the case. There will be openings. Pete DeBoer would have. His would presumably be at the very top of the list for a lot of the teams out there. So if you are a team that hopes to make the playoffs and hopes to be busy and have a head coach less than two weeks from today, your options basically were risk that he would sign with one of those teams or become the only vacancy in the NHL and be able to offer an immediate playoff race, which is pretty attractive, I feel like, to a head coach. And maybe you give yourself the option at that new coach bump too. I felt like that was part of it for Vegas. As we see this, we see a spark when you make a coaching change. I think that's part of. The Islanders have slid too. This is, it's not totally different from the, the arc of Vegas. It's just different in terms of the candidate and they did not give John Torella A long term deal, which is, I think telling.
B
I think you are under underestimating a little bit the urgency of now. Like, yes, I do think jumping the line matters, but the Islanders, the way they have played in front of Ilya Sorokin. Look, we've been talking all year about how Ilya Sorokin deserves MVP consideration. His goal saved above expected is so high. Well, how do you get a lot of goals saved above expected? You face a lot of scoring chances. And the Islanders have been doing that all year. And especially lately during this kind of nose dive they've been taking, they've been so disorganized defensively, they've been terrible. And Sorokin's flailing back there. He's finally coming back to earth because nobody can stop all these shots. What does Pete DeBoer do? He structures a defense. He makes you play better systematic hockey. And the Islanders, the timing makes sense. They have like four or five days off here where they can have this little mini training camp before their last four games of the season. See if they could put something together. It's not like anyone in the east is running away with this other than Pittsburgh right now. All these teams that couldn't lose in March can't win in April. So if they win three out of these last four games, they can still very well make the playoffs. And I think they really believe that DeBoer has a better chance of doing that than Patrick Watt does.
A
I think DeBoer will help structure them. He's a shot suppression wizard. Like, look at every team Pete DeBoer has ever coached in his entire career. They never give up any shots. And then the other part of it is if you look at the Islanders and the core of this team is Matthew Schaefer. And to me, when I think about Pete DeBoer, that's the, like the number one thing that sticks out to me about his systems and his, the way he coaches is he maximizes offensive defense. He did it with Brent Burns in San Jose. Like that was for years and years and years. And Brent Burns was his best player fueling those teams, the transition on those teams. He came to Vegas. Shea Theodore. I thought the best Shea Theodore's ever looked was under Pete DeBoer, letting him be that driver of the offense. He goes to Dallas where he's got Heiskin in. Thomas Harley kind of emerged under DeBoer. I think there, I don't know if there's a better coach in the league to get the most out of Matthew schaefer than Pete DeBoer.
C
The guy I first thought of was Sorokin. Because as good as Pete DeBoer has been for his teams, for his young defenseman, for his offensive defenseman, is not always ended on, and actually has seldom ended on very good terms with his star goalie. And that was the first. Why, what happened with this Jesse?
A
So I. Okay, I've spent the first five minutes of this podcast praising Pete DeBoer. So that setting up so that everyone knows I'm not just a Pete DeBoer hater. Pete DeBoer. And like, I don't know how else to put. How more plainly to put this. Pete DeBoer does not know what he's doing with his goaltenders. He doesn't. And he's been to a million places and he cannot figure it out. He couldn't figure it out in San Jose. He couldn't figure it out in New Jersey. Before that, he ran Marty Bordeaux out of town. That's. That's a, that's an exaggeration. But he was part of it. He goes to San Jose. It didn't work out with the goalies in San Jose. He came to Vegas, it was an absolute disaster. His plan with Robin Leonard versus Mark, Andre Fleury, then he goes to Dallas. And I said to myself, okay, if there's a situation that Pete DeBoer can't mess the goalies up, it's one with a star franchise, young Jake Ottinger and real. And Casey De Smith as a backup, who is a solid backup but is no challenge or no, there should not be a consideration to go to him at any point. Well, Pete DeBoer proved me wrong. He did mess up the goalies there. So while I want to say it's Ilya Sorokin, how like it doesn't matter who the coach is, like, you can't mess it up with Ilya Sorokin. Pete DeBoer might find a way.
B
Well, you're not, you're not hiring Pete DeBoer to be John Cooper or Jared Bednar. You are not hiring Pete Deborah to be your long term coach. He doesn't last. He's. His shelf life is three or four years. Kind of like Peter Laviolette. A lot of these guys that kind of like burn bright but burn out real quick. I think he had five years in San Jose's longest stint. Yeah, and he usually burned some bridges on the way. I mean, I was in that press conference last year when he basically threw Jake Ottinger under the bus and blamed him for the Stars Loss, which was just one of the most jaw dropping things I've ever seen at a press conference. Just how casually he did it, like it didn't even feel calculated. He's like, oh yeah, Jake Ottinger just completely. He's got to make more saves. He blew it for us, basically. This is what he does. But that's. The Islanders aren't thinking about 2032 here. They're thinking about right now. They're thinking about next year. They got this window here. It's not as important as it used to be, but when you have a star on an entry level contract, you need to maximize that window as much as possible. And they have one of the very best defensemen in the world for $975,000 a year or whatever it is for the next two years, they need to maximize that window. That's the window Pete DeBoer is here for, to win right now. For an Islanders team that didn't think they were going to have this opportunity when the season started.
C
So they got passed in the standings yesterday. They are now on the outside of the bubble looking in. It's still very possible that they get in as a wild card. It's still very possible that they get in as a divisional seat in the Metropolitan Division. It's that close in the East. It's especially that close in the Metro. What is the ceiling, though, Laz, of this Islanders team at this point? Because it still feels to me like they're going to be underdogs in any first round series.
B
Well, they were supposed to be retooling, right? Like Matthew Schaefer being as brilliant as he was really changed the calculus on Long Island. Like this was not a team that was expected to make the playoffs this year, even contend for the playoffs. But then something like Matthew Schaefer happens and you feel an urgency that you didn't feel before. I do not think this is going to be a Stanley cup contender anytime soon. I don't know what they can do this offseason. I don't know what Matthew Darsh can really pull out of his hat to greatly improve this team. But you do have Matt Barzell playing at a high level. You have Bo Horvat playing at a high level. You have arguably the best goaltender in the world and you have the most exciting young defense in the league. You should be able to put together a playoff contending team around that. And the Islanders are one of those teams. We're getting a round or two of the playoffs. You know, that's pretty good. That's kind of the goal right now. That gets some, you know, you get some revenue out of that. You, you get some excitement in your fan base out of that. You sell tickets off of that. Not every team is playing for the Stanley cup every year. And I think the Islanders right now are in this. All right. We're not as bad as we thought we were going to be. We're not as far off as we thought we were going to be. Let's try to maintain this, build around it and see if we can do what Boston or Pittsburgh is doing and kind of get to the top of the pack without really changing things that much. I think that's where they are and Pete DeBoer is the kind of coach that accomplishes that.
A
I think New York's ceiling is very low. I think the deadline was not good for them. Braden Shen, Andre Palat, they got older and slower. Palat has done almost nothing since coming in. Shen has been better than that, but still not maybe the impact that they probably initially hoped. I just don't think I agree this team's an underdog in the first round. I think the Islanders ceiling is how far, how many series can Ilya Sorokin steal them single handedly because they're not better than anyone. They're going to play in the playoffs.
C
All right, the question I want to answer before we go to break here and we're going to talk about the comp for this which is the story that's playing out in your market right now, Jesse in Vegas. But first I want to ask about Patrick Waugh because he's had now two stints as a head coach, the first in Colorado. I'm pretty willing to write off as a iconic player. Learning just how hard it is to be a head coach, I felt like as this Islanders tenure was fairly successful. But ultimately the Islanders still felt the need to pull the chute here. Will we see a third act for Patrick WA head coach?
A
Jesse, that's a great question. Like you said, they're probably going to be, I don't know, seven, eight teams needing a head coach. Like we see this every year. Maybe maybe a little less than that. I would imagine Patrick was going to be one of the candidates for those jobs. So it wouldn't surprise me at all to see him get another job. I agree with you. I thought that this stint was, was good in New York. I think you like you listen to him talk. He's not just a great goalie who the name Patrick Wall like you listen to him talk, he understands Coaching. I think he's a good coach. The NHL loves hiring previously fired head coaches instead of giving new young assistants jobs. So, yes, I'll guess Patrick Watt does get a. Get a job in the NHL next season.
C
And by the way, it's not all just on, like, the strength of his playing career that he's gotten these. He was a remarkably successful QMJHL head coach before coming into the Islanders here.
B
And don't forget when he, when he came to Colorado the first time, you took a bad team and took them to division championship very quickly, like, he has succeeded in the NHL. And I know we always complain about retreads. I complain about the retreads as much as anybody, but, I mean, Paul Maurice has been in the Stanley cup final the last three seasons. Pete DeBoer has been to all these conference finals. Rick Bonus, we were just talking about him a couple of weeks ago as coach of the year. Who's more of a retread than Rick Bonus? Peter Laviolette was in the conference final a couple of years ago. There's a reason that these GMs get. You know, they rehire these guys. And yeah, part of it is a lack of imagination. But it is a lot safer to hire a Pete Tabor or even a John Tortorell. Now, you're not John Tortorella, but it is. It is a lot safer to hire some of these retreads than it is to try to find the next Dan Muse, because you might get stuck with the next Jeremy Collaton. There's a lot of guys who flame out real quick when you're trying to be the smartest guy in the room and pick someone new. It's really difficult to do that. We appreciate it when we see. When you see a Dan Muse, you're like, yes, good job. You found the next great coach, and look at what a good job he's doing. But it's just a lot safer to hire a guy who has succeeded in multiple places. And, and frankly, Patrick wa. Has he succeeded for a little bit in Colorado?
A
He's.
B
He exceeded expectations on Long Island. He's going to get another job because this is the NHL.
C
All right, let's take a quick break right there. We'll be right back. We'll talk about Tortorella and Vegas. All right, we are back. And we are one week Jesse, into the John Tortorella experience in Vegas. So we'll stick with the theme of new coaches hired late in the season. Trying to work some magic here. I've always kind of imagined when John Tortorella walks into a new coaching situation. The first thing is he does is he walks into the locker room, flips a table, and you go from there. Am I wrong?
A
We're seeing a new page turned, I think, for John Tortorella.
C
He.
A
It's. It's interesting because this is a coach known for his, like, aggression, I guess, and. And yelling at the players at times, and his emotion. And the players have mentioned the emotion he's shown on the bench already, but he's almost trying to do the opposite here in Vegas, where he came in and he said the Golden Knights hadn't been scoring many goals, and that was the biggest problem for this team when. When they made the coaching change and John Tortorella came in and he's like, I just want them to play without thinking. I want to try to relax them. I want to try to make it okay to make mistakes. And I thought the great example, and it was kind of a good, like, anecdote for what he's trying to get the players to do after his first game. Trying to. Torelle comes into the media room, and we're all like, all right, first torts post game. I wonder how this is going to go. And he's just cracking jokes about himself the entire time. He told us that he was calling Nick Dowd the wrong name for half the game, and he was calling him Wardo. I don't know if that's like, Joel Ward is an assistant coach for the Golden Knights. I don't know how he got Wardo for Nick Dowd, but he was calling him Wardo and he said the players on the bench just let him do it. They thought it was hilarious. They were just like, don't tell him that he's calling the wrong name. Just keep letting him call he Nick the wrong name the entire time. So he came in and he, like, he cracked a joke about that. He cracked a joke about how when the power play ended, he didn't have a line ready to go out. So they were just like, scrambling to get three players on the ice. And then he. And basically he's admitting all these mistakes, and he's like. And that's what I want the players to do. Like, just, if you're going to make a mistake, make it out of aggression. I don't want you to be on your heels worried about mistakes. And I think that maybe that's what they thought was the problem under Bruce Cassidy. Bruce Cassidy is a very X's and O's strategic coach. And maybe the thought was the players are afraid to make mistakes under Cassidy because it's such a rigid system and they brought Tortorella in and he basically hasn't changed anything systematically. He's just telling them to play simpler and play more aggressive and if you're going to make mistakes, do it out of aggression. And so far it's worked.
B
It's so strange because it felt like, you know, when the, when the move happened, it was like, all right, you think it's hard to play for Bruce Cassidy? Here comes John Tortorella, guys. You better, you better shape up. And then he comes in as this cuddly, soft version of John Tortorella and you wonder how long that's going to last, right? Is, is he coaching just for the rest of this year? Is he going to be back next year? Is he just kind of like, like play acting here? You mentioned, I wanted to ask you like, if any, because to see what happens in Long island. We're like a week in the future here. When you look at John Tortorella and we're talking about compete tabor make these structural changes that'll save the, the, the Islanders defense, you're saying he's not doing that in Vegas. It's just a vibe shift.
A
He came in, I think the first sentence out of his mouth when he was introduced as head coach the morning skate that of their, of his first game, he said, I'm not going to make any changes. And everyone just kind of looked around like, wait, wait, what? Like fired the coach? The Stanley cup winning coach with eight games left so that John Torella can not make any changes. He was, he was kind of like it, it's not all like exactly black and white that way, but he, I don't plan on making any major strategic alterations to the way this team is playing. He didn't feel like there's enough time to install a new system and make it effective. It's more a emphasis thing. Like he's emphasizing different things on the forecheck. The forecheck itself hasn't changed, but he's just emphasizing different things on it. Different things on the breakouts. He keeps saying play faster. I'm a little concerned that the Golden Knights weren't playing slow because Bruce Cassidy had them playing slow. I think they're playing slow because they're slow. That, that isn't going to change under John Terrell. And he has. That's probably the word he's used most is play faster, play north. That's you're going to hear that most coaches talk about that, but that has been his biggest emphasis. I just, they've, they've gotten the bump. They've won three games in a row. Two of them, I barely count, because Vancouver, I think it didn't matter who the coach was. They were going to beat the Vancouver Canucks, Calgary, it was a tough game. They ended up getting the win. The win up in Edmonton was very good. Yes, they were missing Dry Seidel and Hyman, so you could even poke holes in that one. But I thought that was one of the better games the Golden Knights have played, played in a, in a while, in months. So they are trending better. We haven't seen them play against a really good team yet. And part of me wonders if this, this, this like initial bump that they're getting from Tortorella and the excitement of having a new coach that they all seem to really like will wear off by the time they play against a playoff team, which I've said multiple times on this podcast, this team cannot beat good teams. They haven't beat them all year.
C
Well, they may not see a playoff team, at least one at full strength until the playoffs because their, their next five games, their final five games at Vancouver, at Seattle, at Colorado, who should have clinched by then, may well be resting guys and then home versus Winnipeg in Seattle. So this may be one big surprise as the postseason begins of like, what do the Tortorella Golden Knights actually look like in a playoff series? But what you said there, Jesse, I think resonated with me. It was very similar to what I experienced when Todd McClellan came in in Detroit a year ago. And it was, the words were like, you know, robotic, stiff, like they felt too rigid as well. And McClellan had the viral practice quote, you know, play F in hockey, you've done it your whole lives. And that really worked, that resonated with players. He did not change really any systems in season. Similar deal. You don't have a training camp to do a full install. You just kind of have to inject some spirit into the group. And I was struck by how powerful that was. But it definitely has a shelf life because coaches, they're wired to, to ultimately come down hard on you too. Like you can free guys up, but inevitably then you're going to play too loose. And it's, it's the push pull, it's the seesaw, it's whatever. It always comes back the other way. And what I think is interesting, we mentioned it in segment one. Tortorella is not on like a long term contract here. This may really just Be. We don't. We don't even need the second half of that. Just free him up. See what they really have in them for this run. They're built to win. Right now. Mark Stone's not getting any younger. It can really just be. Let's inject as much life as possible.
B
And, and I know we all have fun with the Tortorella caricature, and a lot of it is true, but I, I've talked to a ton of players over the years that played for Tortorella, and players like playing for Johnrella. They like him a lot. Like his. His public Persona is different than his Persona in the room. And they like playing hard and they want to be held accountable. And they do kind of find Tordrella fun to play for. Even though we watch, it's like, oh, God, he's here. He is playing for another overtime point, you know, and it's like the fact that he's the safest death guy is hilarious because his teams are like death to watch. But players, not everybody. There are ones that. There are players that clash with him. And when you clash with Tortorella, it's more severe than when you clash with a normal coach. But players like playing for John Tortorella. And the dead cat bounce you get when you hire a new coach. It usually lasts a week, week and a half maybe.
C
No, it's like a month. It's like a month now. I mean, look at some of the recent examples. Columbus with Rick Bonus, that was more than a month. Detroit had two seven game win streaks in their first five, six weeks under McClellan. Like it is. It's longer than I thought.
B
Well, we'll see because they need that. If you get a month out of this and you're winning a playoff round or two and in that Pacific Division, that's not that big of an ask. And I think that's why Vegas was so. You know, Vegas is such a ruthless organization to begin with, but they're willing to do this because they still think there is a very clear path to the Western Conference final for any of these Pacific Division teams in this pillow fight. You know, you win three games and you're looking pretty. So like they're. They're one point out of. Out of first place right now. Anaheim is got like a negative 15 goal differential either tied for the division. Like, this is not a scary lineup and Vegas knows it has the talent and they're just hoping that John Tortorella can get it out of them.
C
They could win the division at this point. I Mean, they're, they're a back Edmonton, they just beat head up. I mean, we'll see how the Oilers finish. Oilers have been hot, but the Ducks, like you said, struggling Vegas can win this division and go in and face a wild card team in round one.
B
Like you said, they've got a Seattle twice. They're in free fall. They got Vancouver again. I mean, this is not a demanding schedule they're facing down the road. They are. John Tortorella is being set up to succeed here.
A
Right? And I think when you mentioned like the players like playing for him, to me, I think John Tortorella is a, is a good fit for this group of players because he's such a hockey guy. Like, he's, he's just like one of the players, like when, when. Well, it feels like you've got a player coaching the team because John Torturell is just a hockey guy. And like I talk to players that have moved on from the Golden Knights, that have gone to other teams and they, they mentioned that there is a tenseness to the building in Vegas. And when you operate as ruthlessly as the Golden Knights have, where every player, like, if you have a bad month and we have a chance to upgrade from you, we will without hesitation. I don't care if you have six years left on your contract. We like it. Like, I remember Riley Smith had the great quote a few years back. Someone asked him, like, are you nervous or are you thinking about your contract playing on a contract year? And he's like, this is the Vegas Golden Knights. Every year is a contract year. Like, there's no such thing as. We, we are always at that. Like that, that possibility is always there. And I do think that it, it affects the players. I, I don't think it always does, but I think when they go through a bad stretch and they can't score, I think there is a tenseness to the building because of the expectations that this organization has set and that at any moment this team will upgrade and it could be you who's getting upgraded. I think a coach like John Trotter, like Bruce Cassidy, I've said this a million times. I think it's a downgrade. I think Bruce Cassidy is a better coach, period. If it was me, I wouldn't have done it. However, Bruce Cassidy is also a type of coach who can make players tense because he's so intense with the strategy and he's so intense with the system. With the systems. Whereas John Tortorella is just kind of a hockey guy and I think he has loosened this group up. Can he do it in the playoffs? I think it's much, much harder to do it in the playoffs when now you're facing Anaheim or Edmonton. And if you lose, what do you think this team's going to do this summer? They're going to replace half of you. So it's like the tenseness can come back when the playoffs get here. But I think Tortorella is built to help them with that.
B
And Tortorella has mellowed in his older age. I think that's pretty clear. This is not the same coach who was in Tampa in 2004 for, you know, years in the media, years of kind of becoming like a little cartoon character himself. He's kind of embraced the kind of the caricature again of him. And I do think this is a mellower. Like that intensity, that fire is still there. But this is not the same guy from 20 years ago.
C
He's also won a gold medal with a handful of guys on that Vegas bench. And I think that matters here, too. The familiarity with Eichel, even though it was a short stretch, like they've been to a battle, a major high profile battle together and won it. Noah Hannifin, same deal. So that could end up playing in their favor. The question I have just to kind of tie these first two segments together. Do we think that the Islanders make the move they made yesterday if they don't see Vegas win those first three games, you know, under Tortorella, and if both of these two teams go into the playoffs and win around, we know how copycat a league this is. Is this going to start being something we have to be thinking about at mid March every single year? How many teams are going to fire their coach looking for that one final bump and win a playoff round off of it?
B
I don't know. It didn't really happen after the Devils did it in the early 2000s. That was like the most extreme example and the most extreme success and it didn't happen then. But I think this is just always like if you're a gm, if you're ownership, this is really the only card you ever have to play in the season is firing the coach. And yeah, it's a little drastic. It reeks of desperation to do it this late in the season. But, you know, we, like you said, new coaches bring new energy. And if you think your team has a path and nobody in the east is really all that scary, nobody in the Pacific is really all that scary. All the scary teams are in the Central Division right now if you see a path and like man, we could win two playoff rounds here if we just make sure we get in. I understand the impetus. I do think it is they are acts of desperation and they don't necessarily make your team better but, but they might make your team more successful. And I understand the impetus.
C
No team in the Pacific is all that scary. There is one player in the Pacific. Well, there's multiple players in the Pacific that are all that scary. One of them of course is Connor McDavid. But one of them is also Macklin Celebre and Elaz. And at this point, I mean we, we, we're talking awards all the time on this show at this point. It's, it's that time. I know we're all thinking about them in the back of our minds as we try to pre organize a ballot. Celebrating is an interesting one because a lot of voters do kind of have a block around the heart trophy of if you don't make, if your team doesn't make the playoffs, you cannot be on their ballot. You certainly cannot be on top of their ballot. Tends to kind of be a rule of thumb. Man, if Celebrini doesn't feel like a worthy potential exception to that rule though,
B
Laz, man, it's interesting. We've been kind of like over the last few months saying, you know, well don't, don't you know Macklin Celebrini deserves some heart trove, some heart votes, right? He deserves some heart love. And now it's like if they make the playoffs at these San Jose Sharks and if you've watched the San Jose Sharks, you know this is not a good hockey team. It's an exciting team. It's a fun team. I'm in San Jose right now. Can't wait to watch Blackhawks Sharks night. That's going to be fun. But this is not a good hockey team. If this team is dragged into the playoffs by this 19 year old phenom, I think he becomes the favorite and it feels like the narrative is heading that way. Over the last few weeks we're seeing more and more talk about that. We love, you know, the writers vote on this and we get debate all day long about the what valuable really means. Right? And the most outstanding player versus the most valuable player debate we have every year ad nauseum. But this, this is the Taylor hall year, right? This is a player who's so much better than every one of his teammates, who has so many more points than any of his teammates. And dragging a team that nobody expected to make the playoffs into the playoffs. If these Sharks make the playoffs, I think Macklin Celebrini wins the hard trophy this year.
A
Yeah, I mean, to, To Mark's point, it's. I think it's 106 points for Celebrini and 54 for Will Smith, who's second on the Sharks. How is that even real life? It doesn't even. Like I'm in my head, I'm like, if these players are on the ice with him and he's getting all these points, like, doesn't somebody else have to get points eventually? It's. It's pretty wild for, For.
B
Well, it's funny because his 50% point gap celebrating his percentage of his teams, of being in on his team's goals is like the same as Connor McDavid's. Even though that gap is that huge, it's really kind of incredible.
C
And to me, like, I try to not make it. I definitely adhere to the valuable definition, but I still try to not make it. Like, guy who has the worst supporting cast award. Yeah, but I, I look at it and the fact that he's within 20 points of Connor McDavid, and you look at who Connor McDavid is surrounded by and how overall good that team is even in a bad year. Like, we know how good the Edmonton Oilers are. The fact that Macklin Celebrini is in that neighborhood and just watching him, you see what a driver he is. We saw it at the Olympics. One of the sneaky battles of this award season is trying to keep any opinions formed in Olympic hockey out of your balloting. But I don't know how to unsee what I saw with Macklin celebrating at those Olympics where he, to me, seemed like the second best player on team Canada at 19 years old and not phased at all by that moment. Like, there's sometimes an award or an argument with. In awards voting with players on bad teams, it's like, yeah, they have all that and they're that much better than their next best teammate because they. There's no one else. They get every opportunity, they get every goal, whatever. There's a pretty easy reputation there if you're willing to just kind of glance over at the Olympic action and see, nope. He does it when he's surrounded by superstars, too.
A
Yeah. I mean, to me, the story is like, celebrity is in that tier. I was just looking at the player tier story that we did at the beginning of the season. I love going through that every year. And like, you look at celebrity, I think he was in, like the third tier down. And it's like, it's wild how. And they were very bullish on him. Like, that was a pro. Celebrini to put to. To put him that high. And now you look at it and it's like he's clearly in the same tier as McDavid and Kucherov and McKinnon. Like, he is that level of player and he hasn't even turned 20 yet. It's pretty wild.
C
Our producer told us just before we started recording this that MACKLIN Celebrini is plus 2,000 for the heart. I don't think he's the favorite right now. I still think that that belongs to either McKinnon or Kucherov. It should not be plus 2,000, I'll tell you that.
B
That should be like 500 if I agree. 100. Like, that's, that's, you know, we're not allowed to gamble on, on these awards, obviously, because we're voting on them, but, man, I would recommend to my friends and family throw some money on that
A
one because just we.
B
We are we as, as the writing group, and I don't say this as me, I like to think I'm a very meticulous voter and I spend hours and hours, you know, pouring. But we as a, as a voting body seem to be very prone to quote, unquote, narrative and the narrative behind Macklin Celebrini, especially because Sidney Crosby won the Heart trophy in his second year. Connor McDavid won the hard trophy in his second year. And look at what Macklin Celebrini is doing. Look what he did. Like you said in Milan, look what he's doing now. If these Sharks make the playoffs, I'm telling you, he has a very real chance of winning this thing.
C
And it's interesting, too, because, like, the McKinnon momentum was so strong through the first half of the year.
B
And there's a for granted, don't we?
C
Yes, it's a blend of, like, he hasn't been quite that good, but he's still been awesome. But I think most of it is just that we got. But people got bored of talking about how good Nathan McKinnon was. You have to fight that. You really do have to fight that when you fill out your ballot. And, And I, like, I voted for Nathan McKinnon on top of my ballot a lot. I still. He's going to be very high on it one way or another. But I, I think especially, like, when I saw how much the Kucherov conversation picked up in the last month, and certainly it's earned. Like, Kucherov's an awesome player. He's having an unbelievable stretch of hockey, not just for, like, 20 games, but for, like, 50 games here. But I always wonder, like, how much of a late season push is just that people were like, well, I don't want to have decided my heart ballot in January, so let's, let's, you know, extra count what's happening recently here.
A
The Aves are victims of, like, the team and McKinnon. Like, they were just so good at the beginning of the year. I feel like they all took their foot off the gas pedal a little bit, and it'll be interesting to see if they can turn it back on in the playoffs. But it definitely seems like that team is not operating at the same level of urgency, at the same. They just don't care because they're so far ahead of everyone, and they have been for months.
B
Yeah, it's like the John Cooper, Jack Adams where it's like, we take it for granted. Like, of course, Nathan McKinnon is great. I don't want to vote for him again. And that's a. That's a lousy way of doing business here. That's not why. That's not how the voting is supposed to work. But I think you're right, Max. I think there is a, you know, ooh, shiny new toy sensation where it's like, I want to vote for something different. I want to change the narrative here. And I do think that Nathan McKinnon and Connor McDavid, they're victims of their own success in that way.
C
It's funny, too, because I think there's an idea that, like, the. The hockey media is a hive mind. I think in reality, we're a collection of wannabe contrarians who don't realize that we're all being contrary, trying to be contrarian in the same way, often at the same time. We all want to be first to the. The new guy, and then we all end up there, and it's like that, you know, now we're all gonna vote for Kucharov. We're all gonna vote for celebrini, and McKinnon's gonna be like, you all said you were voting for me three months ago. Anyway, let's take a quick break right there. We'll come back and we'll talk about the other end of the inner NHL standings. All right, we are back, and some big news that happened over the weekend, that it obviously got a little buried by the deluge everywhere. Else Buffalo Sabers are going to the playoffs last. The Buffalo Sabers have snapped a 14 year playoff drought. That is very good news. Obviously, in order for it to happen, it had to be very bad news for a long time too. But I, I, I think we could all probably feel the collective pressure release everywhere within the Rust Belt, certainly of, of Buffalo fans letting their shoulders drop for the first time in a decade and a half.
B
I loved how the Sabres kind of leaned into it too. Like they didn't pretend like this wasn't a big deal. All the, you know, all the memes they were doing online, like those are like, you know, you know, Andy Dufresne coming through the pipe and the rain coming down on them, they were all excited about. I love that. But how Buffalo was it that they couldn't even celebrate it? That the night that they get, they clinch they're down three nothing to the capital. Six minutes in, they've lost a couple there. They're kind of sputtering down the stretch here it's 2, 3 and 2. And even if you're a Buffalo fan and you've been waiting for this for 14 years, you're like, oh God, we might lose in the first round. It's just until they actually do something in the playoffs. I feel like Buffalo is always going to be this doom saying fan base. But I'm so happy for them. We talked a lot this year about how much I wanted to see a Buffalo Detroit first round series. These two fan bases being rewarded for their infinite patience this last decade plus. But Buffalo, nobody wants it more. Nobody's mad at the Buffalo. Like nobody hates the Buffalo Sabres, right? They're the ultimate bandwagon team. If your team isn't going to make the playoffs, who's not going to root for the Buffalo Sabres? I wonder if they become like a power, how long that lasts for. Just like the Florida Panthers. But I think everyone in the hockey world is excited to see Buffalo. Arguably, I don't think it's even arguable, the best hockey market in the United States finally making the playoffs.
A
Yeah, it's, they're everybody's second favorite team. And I said it a few weeks back, it's like I think the playoffs need the Sabers as bad as the Sabres need the playoffs. Because you look at the Eastern Conference and to me there's so much just like mid, like there's so many teams that it's like the first round series don't have the same pop that they do in the west with we're Going to get Minnesota, Dallas. Like, I want to see what Colorado is. To me, the Western series have a little more pop to them, except for Buffalo. Like, Buffalo is going to be the playoff series everyone wants to watch because everyone wants to see this team either succeed in root form or are they going to do what Buffalo does. It's like to me, Buffalo being solidified. The playoffs gives you one series in the east that you're for sure looking forward to every other night.
C
Yeah, here's how happy I am for Buffalo. They wrote me a speeding ticket when I was there a week ago, and I'm still happy for him. Normally that would be disqualifying. That would be a mental ban list
B
for me on the New York Thruway. They'll get you on the Thruway.
C
Yeah, exactly. It was. I don't. I don't know what everything's called, but it was a. I was not pleased. It happens. But I'm very happy for them. And. And on my way in, I. I drove by a sign that said welcome to Lindy Ruffalo. Which I love that for Lindy, too, that they're. They're renaming the city the city limit sign for him. You know, is it him? Is it. Is it a group of players finally realizing it's now or never? You know, it obviously happens at the time. Time that they make the GM change, which probably lights as big a fire as anything under the players. Like, you can. You can talk about the new coach Bump, if the GM who brought everybody in gets fired. Everyone has to be really scared, really can, you know, at least contemplating what. What is their future going to hold? And whatever it was, it seems to have really kicked them into a totally new gear.
B
I don't want to be the Debbie down here, but should we be concerned about the Buffalo Sabres the way they've been playing down the stretch here? Like they, They're. They're not in the situation that Colorado is in where they're just playing out the string they were playing for, you know, positioning here, and all of a sudden they're just giving up so many goals. Their defensive shortcomings are really kind of coming to bear. The goaltending is not there. They're not really getting bailed out the way they used to. Should we be concerned that one of these teams that's scratching and clawing and fighting to get in kind of like the Florida Panthers a few years ago, that that team is going to be able to just take it to the Buffalo Sabres, who are kind of limping into the finish line?
A
Here.
C
Yes, I think that that's a real consideration. I mean, I, I don't, I don't know how much to totally buy some of the, the Buffalo, like, oh, they play too much of a track meet hockey, like there's certainly some of that in their game. But I also do think they have heavy players. They have two way players like their, their blue line is young and definitely tends toward getting the puck north really fast. I don't think it's necessarily the prototypical playoff blue line, but it's incredibly talented. And when they can hem you in for days, and that's hard to do in the playoffs, but they can do it. The issue is if you're going to be even a little leaky in the playoffs, you got to be able to get bailed out by your goaltending and Alex Lyon was doing that and UKA Pekalukonen is capable of doing that, but they haven't been getting it lately. And that is a scary situation to be in right on the doorstep of the playoffs. You're going to need your goalie to make some rush saves if you're the Buffalo Sabres playing the way that they are.
A
Yeah, I mean there's definitely reason for concern just because the lack of pedigree in history with those two goalies, like if it were, if it were a, like Ilya Sorokin who had a bad couple weeks stretch, we would just say, ha, whatever. I'm not worried, but because Alex Lyon has a history his whole career, basically he has been a hot and cold goalie and we talked a little bit about it when we were talking about my goalie tandem power rankings. I think part of the reason he's so streaky is it's built into the way he plays. He is really aggressive in terms of the depth. He comes out of his blue paint to challenge and when you do that, if you're reading the play really well, there's never any net to shoot at because you're in the right spot and you're so far out there that these shooters, there isn't a corner to be picked. But when you're not reading the play as, as, as well as you can and you're just a half beat behind, that's a way of playing that will give up a bunch of goals. So I think there's a reason he's been streaky. You need to hope that he's hot at the right time. Obviously you have upl who's a, who's another great option. But yes, I think there is Reason for, for concern with the goalies. They've been awesome and I think that they could be awesome in the playoffs. But the fact that they're having a little bit of a cold stretch here and there's reason to see why I would be a little concerned.
B
I am still waiting to see someone get Kevin Adams on the phone and talk to him about how he feels about all this. And I really, if the GMs had a sense of humor and a sense of defiance and any kind of, you know, fortitude, they would vote Kevin Adams GM of the year. Because the GMs vote on the GM of the Year.
C
It would be smart.
B
They want to say, don't fire us, don't fire us. We do agree. Takes a while. It's a long term project. It's a five year plan. It would be the absolute funniest thing if the GMs voted Kevin Adams GM
C
of the Year self servingly. Every GM who's even a little close to that hot seat should be putting his name at the top of the ballot so they can take it to their owner and go, look, this is the situation.
B
Just to give you a little. Just give me one more year, man. Just give me one year.
C
Close to the Diamonds. We're with our pickaxes. We're this close to the Diamonds. Don't do this right now. Then the owners are going to say, yeah, and they got there as soon as they fired him.
B
All right, so let, let's, let's use that as a springboard here because I want to talk about the GM in your neck of the woods, Max. Yeah, Steve Iserman, we all know how tight he is with the organization, with the fan base, with the ownership. They are free falling in March and April again. They might miss the playoffs here, man. Is there any way that Steve Iserman is on the hot seat right now?
C
Yeah, there is. I, like, like it's interesting because I don't know if you tabulate the playoff drought the second Buffalo clinches or if it's at the end of the season, but like, as of now, Buffalo does not have a playoff drought because they're in. And that means the longest playoff drought in the league belongs to the Detroit Red Wings at nine years. They could still break it this year too, but it's not trending that way. It's gone really bad for them lately. They've lost six of their last eight in regulation. It's been seven years under Iserman. And you know, I, I still have a hard time seeing the Ilitch family ever Fire him like that. That would surprise me. But this is a collapse, and it's been a collapse for, depending on how you want to measure it, like, four years ago, was it a collapse or. I mean, they sold at the deadline, right? Maybe that made things worse, whatever. But it's the fourth straight year that in March, they've come completely undone. It's. There's clearly something with this group that. That is. It may be a different story every year, and that's what they've kind of repeated over and over when we asked them about. It is. It's like it's a different team, it's a different story, and there's different details to. To it, for sure, different kind of arcs, but it's the same result year after year. And I think for. For a general manager who's been in that job for seven years, it's. It's kind of unavoidable that those conversations start to pick up. So I don't know. You know, Elliot Friedman floated the theory on his podcast of a, you know, kind of a bump up the Ron Francis effectively. I think that that is interesting. I don't know if you do it that way. I question, like, what really changes? Like, if it's still ultimately kind of the same guy at the top, even if there's a different person in the chair, it's kind of a new voice. But, like, I think you'd be naive to say there's no chance of a front office shakeup of some kind. And it's been as. This is probably as bad of a. Of a collapse as they've had, and that tends to have some kind of consequence.
B
I saw in your story, Tom McClelland, an interesting quote where he's talking about whether it's a confidence issue or a mental fortitude issue. And I'm not sure there's a huge difference between the two, but I know what he means. I've been in rooms where guys are just frustrated and feel snake bitten and feel cursed, and I've been in rooms where players are mentally weak. What. Which one is more likely in Detroit right now?
C
I don't know. Like, they have a problem going back years where when things go wrong, they go really wrong. Like, they. They spiral on them. And it happened last night. I mean, they. They were up 1 0. They played a pretty good first period against the Wild. They give up a goal 18 seconds into the second period, and then they give up three more in the next 11 minutes. Like 12 minutes. That was snowball effect. And that's mostly what McClellan has eliminated from their game through most of this season, like that was the biggest reason that I was willing to kind of buy into this being a different situation this year. Even when some of the underlying numbers, some of the five on five scoring were low, it was like yeah, but what's really killed them is A, they didn't really have goaltending which John Gibson has mostly given them this year at least. Like steady true one, A, consistently goaltending and B, like when they went on a losing streak when they lost a game, it always became a losing streak. When they gave up, you know, a goal that they shouldn't have, it always became two or three goals. That was out of their game for 60 plus games this year. And it has come back at this time of year, which is something psychological. Seems like it has to be the answer to that.
A
I feel like Gibson deserves more credit than he's been given league wide for the season he's had.
C
He's had a tough month is the thing. Like it's like 900 since March 1st.
A
But I agree 900 is above league average.
B
That's right. It's true.
A
We have to redefine what's good goaltending. With all these kids scoring like Macklin Celebrini every night. It's he. I haven't checked it in a couple of weeks so maybe he has fallen behind. But I mean for a while there it was like since the middle of December, which is a very, very long time. John Gibson led the NHL and save percentage since December. Like this isn't a month. It's been months and months and months of very good goaltending. And I wonder if maybe he was part of the reason that like you mentioned, like it covered up, he would stop the bleeding. Like you'd give up a goal but it wouldn't turn into a bunch of them because Gibson would bail you out. And I wonder if he's. He's up there in age. It's been a while since John Gibson has played meaningful games in this time of season. It's been a while since he's played this many games in a season. I wonder if he's. If he's running out of G and isn't able to cover up some of the mistakes that he was earlier in the year.
C
He started something like 14 consecutive games from for them including both ends of a back to back. He ends up getting pulled on the second half of that. So you can kind of question I guess some of the wisdom to that, not the back to Back this weekend that. The previous one. But yeah, it was it. I actually think that they want it, like, maybe a little too much. Like, I think it's just. It's on there, it's on their, their shoulders, it's on their faces. Like, it's like, this can't happen again. And I, I feel for him, it's. It's a brutal situation, but it's. It's happening again. And they have not found a way to, to make it stop.
B
And the way they lost to the Wild was so brutal. They. They do have that collapse and they come all the way back. Patrick Kane takes a bad penalty, they lose it late. I mean, it's, it's almost worse to, to come close and then, then that. Then when. That's when you really get in your heads. Like, even when we do things right, were still coming up empty on there and you start gripping the sticks too tight. These are human beings. I know we think of these. These are professional athletes. They have the memory of a goldfish and they can move on and flush it. They can't. These are. These. They understand the situation. They know the history in Detroit. They know how much this matters. They know their own history and they're feeling it every single time they hop over the boards. They're feeling the weight of that. No matter how veteran you are, even Patrick Kane is going out there feeling the weight of that playoff drought right now in Detroit.
C
Because I really think they thought this was different. I mean, Kane had a quote earlier this year that was like, I've been on good teams. This is a good team. You know, like, there's, there's numerous instances of the way that they've talked and be like, oh, they really believe in what they have. Steve Iserman traded an unprotected first round pick at this trade deadline. That was not wise to not protect that pick. But that tells you how much he believed in this team. And I thought, like, for the record, I thought that was a good trade. Like, I would always protect the first round pick. Even the Florida Panthers protect their first round picks. So I'm not justifying that. But that pick looked like it was going to be like 22 at the time they made that trade. I thought that was a perfectly fine trade. So I am not, you know, changing my opinion on that a month later when it's convenient. It's just that, like, I'm telling you, that's how much they thought that this was different, is they were willing to trade their first round pick without protection on it. And it's just all come collapsing down on them. So it's not too late. They're two points out. Technically it's still there. But over the last month they have not looked like a team that can easily make up a two point gap with five games to play. And it looks like that by the end of this year they may very well be the holders of the longest playoff drought in the NHL.
A
Which is insane. Like this team went whatever 20 something years making the playoff, they had the all time streak for playoff and then it wasn't like they missed it a couple of years, then made it a couple of years, then missed it a couple and then started the drought. It literally went back like they went with 20 years without missing the playoffs and 25 immediately. 25 and then immediately into the longest drought in the league. That's absolutely insane.
B
It's something for the Toronto's of the world to keep in mind. Tear down rebuilds. They're long shots, man. They're really, really difficult to pull off. They take a really, really long time. They really, really test your fans patience. You look at what Pittsburgh and Boston are doing, that's what everybody's going to want to do.
C
Now this is fascinating that you say that though, Lass. Okay. Because I feel like right now both Toronto and Detroit can kind of look at each other. Spider man meme, right? Toronto's looking at Detroit and saying, see, this is why we can't tear it down. And Detroit in a similar vein has to be looking at Toronto and saying like we can't, you know, do something drastic with our roster here because it doesn't always make things better. And now I think they need to do something with the roster and let me be clear about that. But there was scapegoating in Toronto that I'm starting to see bubble among the fan base in Detroit and they want to, you know, pick a scapegoat to blame and say we got to get this guy out and that'll fix everything. Look at the Toronto Maple Leafs. It will not. It will make things worse and you will be in a worse situation a year from now. That's not to say run it back. I'm not saying copy Toronto because that obviously wasn't working either. But that's how bad a situation you get to when you're in this spot where you have this hump that you can't seem to get over and you want to be like, okay, just change this and it'll all fix it or blow it all up or you could blow it all up and you could do this whole thing again. It's. It's a. It's the worst spot you can possibly be in the NHL.
B
I love how the Toronto Maple Leafs have become the cautionary tale. And in all situations, they. They tanked. It didn't work. They ran it back a hundred times.
C
Seemed like it seemed like it worked, and then it didn't work.
B
It didn't work. But then they kept running it back and that didn't work. And then they're like, okay, we're going to get tough now. We're not going to be a skill team. They got to. They're going to retool. And then that didn't work. Like, no matter what you're doing, you can look at the Toronto Maple Leafs and go, oh, God, we're screwed.
C
Yeah. Which era of Toronto Maple Leafs don't you want to be? Is the. Is the ultimate question. I know. It's crazy. Crazy. It's crazy. There's a lot. There's a lot there. I mean, we could do a whole podcast on the Red Wings, but I. I think we should probably wrap there for today. Thanks for doing this to both of you. And thanks to you all for listening to this episode of the Athletic Hockey Show. All the Sean's you want, none you don't. Frankie, Corrado, all with you on Wednesday. We'll talk to you soon.
The Athletic Hockey Show
Episode: Islanders fire Roy, hire DeBoer in late-season shakeup
Date: April 6, 2026
Hosts: Max Bultman, Jesse Granger, Mark Lazerus
This episode unpacks one of the wildest late-season coaching carousel weeks in recent NHL memory, focusing on the New York Islanders' shocking decision to fire Patrick Roy and hire Pete DeBoer with just four games left in the regular season. The hosts debate the reasoning and implications behind the move, compare it to the recent John Tortorella-for-Bruce Cassidy swap in Vegas, and dive into the copycat tendencies of NHL front offices. The conversation then pivots to broader playoff races, team dynamics, goaltending issues, awards chatter (especially surrounding Macklin Celebrini for Hart), and reactions to the Buffalo Sabres finally snapping their 14-year postseason drought.
Desperation & Timing: Hosts highlight the extraordinary timing—just four games left in the season—labeling it both a “shocker” and potentially necessary given the team’s collapse and the wide-open Eastern race.
"If the Vegas one was a surprise, this is a shocker." — Mark Lazerus [00:24]
Strategic Jump on DeBoer:
The major factor: the Islanders didn't want to miss out on Pete DeBoer before other clubs with pending vacancies could hire him. DeBoer's track record of playoff success (six conference finals in eight years, 19 consecutive seasons as an NHL head coach) made this a calculated risk.
“Pete DeBoer was going to get a job and the Islanders thought Pete DeBoer is an upgrade over Patrick Roy.” — Max Bultman [01:51]
Contrast with Vegas’ Tortorella Move:
The situation is contrasted with Vegas swapping Cassidy for Tortorella, which the hosts feel was a downgrade ("Tortorella hasn't done squat since winning the Stanley Cup 22 years ago." — Mark Lazerus [02:48]), whereas DeBoer is considered a clear upgrade given his playoff bona fides.
Immediate Needs vs. Long-Term Fit:
The Islanders hope DeBoer's structure brings rapid improvement, especially defensively, for a playoff push. The presence of a mini-break in their schedule gives them a rare “mini training camp” opportunity, further supporting the timing.
“Pete DeBoer will help structure them. He's a shot suppression wizard.” — Max Bultman [05:30]
Known for Defensive Structure & Maximizing Offensive D-men:
Every team DeBoer has coached has suppressed shots well. Hosts cite his success maximizing players like Brent Burns (San Jose), Shea Theodore (Vegas), Miro Heiskanen (Dallas), and look forward to him doing similarly with Islanders’ young star Matthew Schaefer.
Issues with Goaltenders:
DeBoer has a problematic track record with goalie management, from Martin Brodeur to Jake Oettinger and Marc-André Fleury.
"Pete DeBoer does not know what he's doing with his goaltenders. He doesn't." — Jesse Granger [06:42]
Short Coaching Shelf Life:
DeBoer is seen as a win-now coach with a 3-4 year expiration date, not a 10-year solution.
Will Roy Get Another NHL Job?
The hosts agree—despite being fired, Roy’s improvement in New York and a bias toward recycling experienced coaches make him likely to land another head coach offer soon.
"The NHL loves hiring previously fired head coaches instead of giving new young assistants jobs. So yes, I'll guess Patrick Roy does get a job next season." — Max Bultman [11:32]
Retread Debate:
Discussion on why ‘retread’ coaches continue to get jobs (safer, proven), even if fan/media calls for fresh faces are loudest.
Torts’ Surprising Soft-Touch Start in Vegas:
Instead of his notorious fiery style, Tortorella is aiming to relax the team, encourage playing without fear of mistakes, and maintaining humor and humility.
"He's just cracking jokes about himself the entire time." — Jesse Granger [14:03]
No System Overhaul:
Tortorella isn’t implementing new systems, just emphasizing different details (“play faster, play north”), believing there’s no time to overhaul structure with so few games left.
Initial Results & Skepticism:
Golden Knights have won three straight under Tortorella, but hosts question the caliber of opponents and wonder how long the “vibe bump” will last.
"They all seem to really like [Tortorella]... but I wonder if this, this like initial bump ... will wear off by the time they play against a playoff team." — Jesse Granger [16:39]
Islanders Outlook:
Even with DeBoer, Isles are first-round underdogs—their ceiling depends on Sorokin’s ability to “steal” them a series or two.
"The Islanders’ ceiling is how many series can Ilya Sorokin steal them single handedly..." — Max Bultman [10:33]
Eastern Conference Mid-Tier:
With so many “mid” teams in the East, a coaching gamble + hot goalie might be enough for a run—even if the roster has clear holes.
Copycat Behaviors:
Should frantic late-season coaching changes succeed, the trend could take hold league-wide.
Celebrini as MVP Candidate:
If the Sharks make the playoffs, there’s consensus that Macklin Celebrini’s individual impact makes him not just a candidate but possibly the Hart favorite. The sheer gap between him and his next-best teammate in points is compared to Taylor Hall’s MVP year.
"If this team is dragged into the playoffs by this 19-year-old phenom, I think he becomes the favorite." — Mark Lazerus [26:46]
Old vs. New Narratives:
Despite a common voting bias against players on non-playoff teams, hosts argue he’s a massive exception.
"He does it when he's surrounded by superstars, too." — Max Bultman [29:31]
Odds Discussion:
Celebrini at +2000 for Hart is labeled “insane” by the hosts.
Voter Psychology:
Debate around “shiny new toy” syndrome, where voters flock to newer names and storylines, leaving stalwarts (like McKinnon) under-appreciated.
"We as a voting body seem to be very prone to narrative and the narrative behind Macklin Celebrini..." — Mark Lazerus [30:29] "It's a blend of ... he hasn't been quite that good, but he's still been awesome. But I think ... people got bored talking about how good Nathan McKinnon was." — Max Bultman [31:06]
Emotional Release and Fanbase Joy:
Sabres’ clinching is met with social media catharsis and fun by both the team and fanbase.
"I loved how the Sabres kind of leaned into it... those [Shawshank Redemption] memes, they were all excited about." — Mark Lazerus [33:42]
Cautious Optimism:
Despite the celebration, there’s concern about their recent defensive woes and inconsistent goaltending heading into the playoffs.
"They're not really getting bailed out the way they used to. Should we be concerned?" — Mark Lazerus [36:42] "Yes, I think that that's a real consideration." — Max Bultman [37:15]
Goalie Streakiness:
Alex Lyon’s hot/cold style and UPL’s inexperience add unpredictability to Buffalo’s ceiling.
Detroit’s Late-Season Collapse:
Once again the Red Wings falter late, risking the league's longest playoff drought (if Buffalo’s end holds). Steve Yzerman’s job security, after seven years as GM, is discussed—possibly moving “upstairs” if not outright fired.
"It's the fourth straight year that in March, they've come completely undone... there's clearly something with this group." — Max Bultman [40:31]
Goaltending as a Factor:
John Gibson (traded midseason) had masked issues earlier in the year; recent struggles may relate to his heavy workload.
The Cautionary Tale of “Tear-downs” vs. Running it Back:
Both Toronto and Detroit serve as opposite warnings: staying the course too long vs. blowing it up can both backfire.
"It's something for the Toronto's of the world to keep in mind. Tear down rebuilds. They're long shots, man. They're really, really difficult to pull off." — Mark Lazerus [47:35]
| Topic | Approx. Timestamp | |---------------------------------------------|------------------| | Islanders fire Roy, hire DeBoer | 00:24 – 06:25 | | DeBoer's goalie management issues | 06:25 – 09:01 | | Isles’ playoff outlook | 09:01 – 11:02 | | Patrick Roy’s future | 11:02 – 13:30 | | Tortorella’s start in Vegas | 13:59 – 19:58 | | “New coach bump” discussion | 19:58 – 25:17 | | Celebrini for Hart Trophy, Awards talk | 26:08 – 32:35 | | Buffalo clinches playoffs | 33:42 – 37:14 | | Red Wings collapse, GM debate | 40:08 – 49:18 |
Friendly, informed, debate-centric with a mix of skepticism, admiration, and wry humor about the NHL’s quirks. The hosts manage deep analysis but don't lose sight of the entertainment and human drama at the heart of hockey.
For listeners who missed the episode, this recap gives you a comprehensive look at the late-season drama, coaching consequences, playoff hopes, and award races shaking the NHL as the postseason looms.