Vince McGaliano (35:34)
One that, you know, he gives them a fighting chance pretty much any year. Like, he's masked a lot of their flaws in the past. This, even when they were winning a President's trophy, was not a great five on five team. They just had elite goaltending, they had elite special teams and they had some weird magic stuff that was going on that season where they had all those comeback wins. But five on five, this is a flawed team and I think deep down at least some people within the organization recognize that. And that's why you saw them start to try to shift last year. They just, as I mentioned before, gave up a lot of guys and didn't get, get a whole lot back. But I, I think that they are probably looking at it like we have Fox, we have Shusturkin. I don't think J.T. miller is going anywhere. Although that trade is, is not looking great so far. I don't know how well that deal is going to age. He's got four more years after this. He looks a step slow as far as, you know, being a guy that can put up 100 plus points. That was four seasons ago. It looks like it was eons ago. He's on pace for like 50 points this season and I know he's been playing through some injuries, but I also don't think that he's a high level play driver anymore. I don't think he's the kind of guy that's going to have his the puck on his stick a lot and make a lot of plays for you. He'll do some of the grunt work, he'll be a bulldog, he'll get to the net, he'll do all those things. And I think certainly in a healthy season you can expect more than 50 points out of him, but I think he's going to be closer to 50 than he is to 100 moving forward. So. Yeah, I agree with you. There's, there's a lot of reasons to be skeptical. I, I do wonder though, how much of this is is framing and optics, which I believe is important to ownership. And calling it a retool instead of a rebuild was a that they want to send. Even though deep down I'm not sure how convinced they are that they can turn this around super quickly. The one thing that a few people have mentioned to me is they're going to try to load up on assets right now. We know they're going to trade Panarin. I think they're listening on just about everybody. They've got guys with no movement clauses who my understanding early on, you shouldn't expect to see any hit thing happen with them, at least not at this trade deadline when we're talking about like Mika Zabanajad. I don't think Adam Fox is going anywhere certainly, or Miller or Gavrikov or Shosturkin. But I do wonder. You know, you mentioned Schneider. That's a guy that it sounds to me like teams are already starting to sniff around on. He hasn't developed the way the Rangers would hope. Like he's not a shutdown guy, but he's a big, strong physical right shot D and a lot of general managers value that. So I think they could probably still get something of value for him. And the really big chip that they have is Trocheck. I think if the Rangers open things up on Trocheck, he's got a 12 team, no trade list. But there's a lot of teams I think that are sniffing around on him right now if they open that up. Look at what the Islanders got for Brock Nelson last year and he was a rental. Trocheck has three more years on his contract at $5.6 million for a second line center. That's a bargain with the rising cap right now. So Trocheck, we saw Bill Garon just selected him for the US Olympic team. He's the type of heart and soul guy who kills penalties, win the face off, can chip in some offense that I think general managers will really value, and I think the Rangers could probably get a pretty sizable haul back for him. If you want to kick start this prospect of restocking the cupboards, so to speak, I think you have to consider trading a guy like that. And I think they're certainly listening, at the very least right now on him. So those are some of the main pieces. And then I think they feel like, okay, if we can load up on some picks, get some younger players, maybe we'll be in a position where we can start flipping some of those picks to. They want to try to bring back young guys, you know, a situation that a few people have pointed to, or a couple actually are. Washington, you look what they did. They sold for two straight trade deadlines, but then they made a lot of trades for Chickren and a lot of other guys to sort of jump start their process of getting back into contention. And Montreal is another example as well. I actually had Arpin on my podcast last week, and we went through the whole Montreal rebuild process, and they turned things around pretty quickly. But what he pointed out to me, which goes to your point, Laz, is they had Caulfield and Suzuki and some other good young players already in the system when they started their rebuild or retool or whatever we want to call it, the Rangers don't have those guys coming right now. So that. That is a very clear concern. But I think they're thinking, okay, if we can load up on assets and then flip them in trades for younger players that we find appealing. Now, who is that going to be? I don't know. I can't sit here and tell you, you know, whether a Jason Robertson or a Brady Tkachuk or anybody like that comes free in the next couple years, we'll have to wait and see. But I think their mindset is, okay, let's rebuild our prospect pool a bit, let's collect some assets, and then when opportunities arise, we'll have the pieces to strike in some of these trades. Because, like, they were in on the Quinn Hughes trade and they just didn't have the ammunition to get it done. I think they realized that they need more ammunition and they're trying to load up on that right now.