Loading summary
Perry Romanowski
Hi, I'm Perry and you're listening to the Beauty Brains. Hello and welcome to the Beauty Brains, a show where real cosmetic chemists answer your beauty product questions and give you an insider's look at the cosmetic industry. This is episode 402i. Hello, I'm your host, Perry Romanowski and with me today is Nobody. It's just a solo episode here today. Valerie of course is off well taking care of her baby. She actually had a baby boy and perhaps we'll get more details about that when she returns early next month. No doubt, you know, she's taking some time for the baby. Apparently babies take some work. But the work goes on here at Beauty Brain central. And on today's show we're going to cover lots of questions including are the is clinical hydrocool products special? What do we think of the anti aging effectiveness of the Pavis sunscreen? What ingredients might be responsible for the great results in a conditioner? What can be done about under eye dark circles? And finally, how do you practice sun safety? Diligently. I hope you do it more diligently than me. I'm not very good at it, but I could talk about it. Alright. You know, this is normally where we do chitchat and of course, you know, I interact with Valerie, but Valerie's not here. In fact, the only one here is my cat Teddy. And hopefully I had to shut the door because he kept jumping on my lap. It's not the best thing to try to podcast and pay attention while, you know, you have a cat. But you know, he's doing good. All the outdoor kitties are all doing well. It's nice summer here in Chicago, so they just mostly lounge around underneath bushes and things. But you know, summer does make me go outside a bit more. You know, I go out to do my running and my leg is still kind of gimpy but seems to be getting better. So maybe I don't need that physical therapy after all. We'll see. I guess. You know, I'm, I'm terrible at making doctor appointments. I don't have anything against the doctor. I'd be perfectly happy to go. It's the appointment part, you know, you have to call people or figure it out online. It's all very complex, our health. You know, I need, I need a personal assistant to do this for me, otherwise it doesn't get done. But you know, the truth is it does remind me of realities about any condition, whether it's cosmetic or health related. You know, there are three things that can happen with any kind of treatment that you do. First, things could get better. So you do a treatment, it gets better. Another thing that could happen is it could get worse. You do a treatment and it keeps getting worse. And then the third thing that can happen is nothing. It stays exactly the same. You do the treatment and it stays the same. So get better, get worse, stay the same. Those are the three things that can happen with any health condition or, you know, any beauty condition, wrinkles, or the way you look or dandruff or whatever, anything. But you know what? Whether you do a treatment or not, those same three things can happen. So if you do nothing, it can get better and get worse. And. Or it could stay the same. And for now, I guess my doing nothing for my leg is it's getting better. So do I need to do anything? I don't know. I probably should. All right. Normally we would talk about the news, and I thought I'd do something a little different since solo show, why not? I'll just do a quick. Let me just talk about a topic that, you know, it's been on my mind a bit and I haven't really talked about it recently. So let's talk about the natural and organic products. I get these in my inbox all the time. Products, talking about how organic or natural they are. And, you know, honestly, as a chemist, it kind of bugs me because I'm a little bit tired of watching smart consumers get sucked in by these fancy marketing stories. The packaging, the green leaves on the label, and this promise that a natural product is better. And by implication, anything that's synthetic is not better. You know, and here's a spoiler alert. Natural is not better. Cosmetics are not natural. You can't go out and grow yourself a skin lotion. You just can't. There's no skin lotion plant. No, it's. It's not natural. You have to gather up the materials, take them into a laboratory, and mix them together in the right proportions to create a lotion that you're going to use. And no natural plant is going to do that for you. There isn't that. The closest you can get to a real natural product would be something like coconut oil, where, you know, the coconut makes it. You squeeze it out of the oil, out of the plant, and you got that oil. That's it. Just that one ingredient. I mean, coconut milk, something like that. So things that plants produce, but plants don't produce lipstick, and they don't produce moisturizers, and they don't produce cleansers. There's nothing Natural about cosmetics, you see, they try to use that natural terms in the same way that food they try to do natural for food. And for food, there is natural. You can go out and grab a banana off a tree and eat it because it was naturally grown. It's food. It's plants. That's what they grow, food. You can't go to a bush and pick off a lipstick because plants do not grow cosmetics. So cosmetics are not natural. Okay? Now you might say, well, it's not natural, but it's made unnatural stuff. And okay, it starts that way, but you have to process everything to make it into a cosmetic. And in those processing stops, start steps. You make it less and less natural and more and more synthetic. And so really, there's no products on the market, with the exception of, I think Jason has a coconut oil that you could just buy for your hair. But besides that, there are no natural cosmetics there, and certainly there are no natural color cosmetics. Again, while the colorants can be natural, they're not out there naturally in the form that you could use them in a cosmetic. Now, let's talk also about safety. Now, people often assume that if a product is organic, then it must be safer. But here's the truth. You know, nature doesn't care about your skin or your hair. Nature doesn't care what you look like. Quite frankly, the natural human look would be, I don't know, something like pictures of Neanderthals or something like that. You know, that's caveman kind of stuff. Like, we aren't really. It's not natural to try to look good with cosmetics. Just not natural, you know. And, you know, nature is often trying to kill us. There's poison, there's arsenic, radiation. I mean, these things are all natural, and they're all dangerous. Even petrolatum that you get from petroleum and from oil. Oil's natural. We don't. We don't synthesize oil. We just drill that right out of the ground. And so that's natural. And then things like essential oils, they can cause phototoxicity, allergic reactions, skin irritation. You know, these are natural things, and they're not more safe. And if you talk about performance, the synthetic ingredients were invented because they were improvements on what we were using for natural things. One that I think of is shellac. We used to use shellac for hair styling. It was like hairspray. And shellac is, you know, it's a natural resin that comes from the secretion of an insect, you know, and the insects are in India or something like that. Anyway, it's natural. And the problem with it is it holds your hair, but you can't get it off. It's hard to get off. So thus we invented the synthetic polymer polyvinyl pyrrolidone, which holds wonderfully, but then you can wash it off. So that's nice. So when you're talking about performance, synthetic products are designed to work better than anything that's natural. And they do, they really do. Now if you want a moisturizer that actually moisturizes or you know, a retinoid that doesn't break down before it reaches your skin, chances are you're going to need some extra boost from science to make sure that those things are stabilized and that they work. That doesn't make it bad, that just makes it more effective. And here's the kicker. You know, the thing that nobody wants to talk about. These organic products and natural products are often worse for the environment. Yeah, worse. I mean, organic farming, it uses more land, more water, it has lower yields. And if you're harvesting like rare plants and some of your luxury serums, you know, you're not saving the planet, you're actually contributing to the loss of biodiversity. Compared that to some lab made actives, these things are scalable, they're consistent, and they're far less demanding of natural resources. We're just much more efficient at creating these synthetic things. We know all the steps in making them. You know, sustainability isn't just about natural. It's, you know, sometimes you got to use your brain. But the thing that I think most frustrates me about this is the way that these things are marketed. Like the, the whole natural equals virtuous or this narrative. It's, it's just pure branding. You know, these companies are selling you an identity, they're not selling you any extra benefits. You're not just buying that lotion, you're buying this illusion that you're a better person doing better things for the environment by picking this, this. It's fear marketing. It's guilt marketing. They make you fear chemicals, they make you fear science, they make you fear, you know, man made things and they get you to spend more money on products that don't work as good. So, you know, I'm not saying that all natural ingredients are bad. Now there's, there's plenty of great ingredients that are natural. And you know, if you want to tend more towards natural cosmetics, you could find products that work perfect, perfectly fine. It's just that these, they're not natural, they're maybe a little less synthesized than other things. But let's not kidding ourselves. Cosmetics are not natural. So if you really want skincare that works, I would just skip the stories and just look for ingredients that actually work. Get evidence, and don't worry about where they came from, because that doesn't matter when it comes to performance. All right, well, that's my rant for today. So let's move on to some of the questions that were sent in. First question was sent in by Deb. She says, are you familiar with is clinical products, specifically the hydracool, their hyaluronic acid product, and their pro heal serum. I am new to is and always wary because I have rosacea. Any thoughts regarding this rather pricey line of products which would be most appreciated? And then I looked up the products here. So let's talk about this hydrocool serum. So what's in it? The main thing that they say is in it is hyaluronic acid. You know, they have sodium hyaluronate in it, and it's the second ingredient in there. And then they have pantothenic acid or, like, panthenol, pentalene glycol, another humectant, and then some mushrooms and centella extracts. It's got this lightweight texture. So, you know, it's probably. Aesthetically, it's nice. But let's talk about these actives. I mean, the product costs over a hundred bucks. Like, whoa. I mean, that's. That's up there, but okay, but, you know, that's me. Let's talk about. I mean, hyaluronic acid is everywhere. There's literally hundreds of cheaper options that exist to just hydrate the skin like that. And don't get me started on, you know, glycerin is perfectly fine compared to hyaluronic acid because it actually, in practice, works better. Then there's menthol in there, which is just this gimmicky cooling thing. It feels kind of cool. You put menthol on your skin, it kind of feels. That gives that, wow, it's working kind of feel. But it can actually irritate sensitive skin. And so if you have rosacea, it's probably not a good idea to. To use that. Then they have this extract overload. I mean, okay, centella and mushrooms and all these botanical extracts, they all sound nice, but honestly, that's all the claims agree. These things are not actually doing it. If. If there was a compounder who was making these products and they forgot to put the mushroom extract in there, you would notice exactly no difference in performance, because these things Aren't really doing anything measurable except giving you a story to, to learn about and you know, mushrooms. It, well, sounds natural. And then as far as the marketing goes here, I mean, there's really no evidence that this combination of ingredients does anything what beyond what a hyaluronic acid serum would do or some other kind of calming gel. So I would say this is, you know, this may be a pleasant, cool feeling serum when you use it, but I don't see anything revolutionary here. And it's definitely overpriced. So you know, if it feels good to you and, but it's not gonna be for me, it's not gonna perform better. Now let's look at their pro heal serum. And they say, you know, it's got l. Ascorbic. Oh, vitamin C, vitamin E. Okay. Olive leaf extract, zinc sulfate, retinol, kojic acid. It's not a lot of ingredients. In fact, there's probably too many ingredients that are just crammed in there together. Ascorbic acid is notoriously unstable and irritating. So by the time you get it, probably you're not getting any of the oxidation value or the antioxidant value of ascorbic acid. And then when you have alcohol in there, you have retinol, kojic acid, zinc sulfate. I mean this could be a red flag formula for sensitive skin, especially rosacea prone skin. Those ingredients could cause some problems for that. And they had this antioxidant cocktail. You know, while vitamin C and E theoretically can work synergistically together, and that's from the skinceuticals had this patent on it for C and E and ferulic acid, you know, the, is clinical. They haven't really released any detailed stability data. So you know, do, when they put those ingredients together, do they stay active or degrade? You know, you can't really know. Now if you look at this product, many of the ingredients, the ascorbic acid, the retinol, they can aggravate sensitive skin. So even if the olive leaf or the zinc may be put in there to calm the inflammation, in theory, theory, you could still have a problem with this. So it's, it's not, you know, it's not, not that promising. If you have a concern about rosacea already, again, this is a $165 serum. You'd expect some sort of published trials or outcomes. You know, it's just they offer you a marketing copy. So not, not any supporting science. Although I have to say I would be skeptical of the supporting science too. So, you know, I'm just Generally skeptical of research published by a company that's trying to get you to buy something. But that's how the cosmetic industry is now, is clinical. They position themselves as clinical grade skin care. But you know, they don't have peer reviewed studies, they don't have independent comparisons. In fact, they give you very little formulation detail at all. So the bottom line is, as we always say here, the price of something does not tell you anything about its performance and is clinical uses. They have nice packaging, they have polished marketing. Of course it's a prestige positioning and you know, that's often what it is. But mostly you're just paying for the branding. There's no breakthrough formulations that I see here based on the ingredient lists and such. Now, if you do have a rosacea, you know, you're probably better off looking for something that's a more simple product. Fragrance free products, you know, something that's designed for barrier repair, not like this cosmeceutical things. I know La Roche Posay has some products, Vanicream, you know, even the ordinary has some products that you might try that you can get all of these same benefits for a lot less money. All right, thanks for that question. Next up is Angela. Dear Beauty Brains, I just discovered your podcast and love it. Oh, well, thank you, Angela. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I would like to ask your opinion about the anti aging and sun protection effectiveness of Pavise sunscreen. Thank you, Angela. All right. Pavie sunscreen. You know, when you asked about it, I had not heard of this before and yet now I see it's outsmart skin aging with damage. Diamond core. Ooh, diamond core technology. Skin that behaves younger, powered by patented biotechnology. Okay, they're going for the science play here. So at its core, Pevis, as I can see it, they use 15% zinc oxide and zinc oxide is an approved mineral sunscreen filter in the US that's effective and safe. So it works. But this is hardly groundbreaking compared to the countless other mineral sunscreens that are out there. There's tons of them. But that's the thing about sunscreen that's hard for companies to sell sunscreen because everybody is restricted, at least in the United States and around the world. You're restricted to the ingredients, just different ones. But everyone is restricted to the same ingredients that they can use for the active ingredient, the part that makes the sunscreen. Not now, you can put other ingredients in there and you can get some variation there. But as far as if you're making a sunscreen, there are actives you have to use in the United States. Zinc oxide is one of those actives. Titanium dioxide is another one of those actives. And then there are all these organic chemical sunscreens, avobenzone, the ones like that. So there's, you know, there's 16, there's really only eight that are still produced in the United States. But anyway, everybody has to use those. And then, so if you're, you got to use those and they tell you the, the maximum you use for zinc, for example, is 25%. They use 15% here. And presumably they get to some level now they have this diamond core technology and this is purely marketing spin because, you know, it's just zinc oxide with, mixed with diamond powder. And now they claim it eradicates 80% of the reactive oxygen species and boost collagens. But then they don't provide any studies on that and they're not transparent about their methodology. So, okay, so you can just say that, I mean, how, how are you going to measure that you've eradicated 80% of the reactive oxygen species. And just because you did that, that, does that mean anything? 80%. But you know, if 20% will do just as much damage, you haven't really helped anything. So, so I don't know. It doesn't help for me. Then this is touted as SPF 30. And then they have the PA plus plus, which is the way that, you know, that's the Japanese and Korean rating. We don't really do that in the United states. There's only SPF. So it's SPF 30 that is regulated. But the PA, which indicates a UVA protection right now, that's not regulated in the US So the actual performance, you know, that's just depends on the various test conditions that there's not really a good way to test for UVA protection, despite what companies will put on there. There are tests, don't get me wrong, there's just not a good one. Because you see, SPF testing is easy. Sun protection factor is what you can measure when somebody burns, how many minutes does it take them to burn? And you put your cream on and then you can see how long does it take to burn with our cream on. And then you get your SPF. So SPF 30 means that you can be in the sun for 30 times, however minutes it takes you to burn. So if you're a person who goes out in the sun and you burn in one minute, you wear an SPF 30. Well, you can be out in the sun for 30 minutes if you burn in 10 minutes and you wear an SPF 30. Well, theoretically, you can go out in the sun for 300 minutes. Or was that six hours or five hours? Well, I wouldn't, you know, you want to reapply, but that's, that's the idea with spf. So there's a way to measure that with uva. We don't know how to measure UVA because we, you know, it takes a long time. UVA is the one that's responsible for tanning, and so it takes a long time for tanning to show up. So there's no test you can do to measure how well something protects from uv? No, no good test, in my opinion, for measuring uva. So anyway, that's, that's why we haven't worked out here in the US Now Pavus brags about having this photo aging defense cocktail, and that includes niacinamide, astaxanthin, pycnol, pycnogenol, silymarin, licorice extract, transexam, you know, all these things you have in other things. But, you know, while individually, some of these might be able to show benefits if you isolate them, whether that translates to a product, I don't know. But when you cram them all together at these, all these different concentrations, how are you going to know that this is. First, Are they effective? Are they stable? Do they have any meaningful effect at all? They could just put on there at a small level and, you know, not do anything. But. And that's very common here. So, you know, I, I'm skeptical of it. Like, if they forgot one, it's, it's a lot, A lot of times these ingredients are like that mushroom extract, where whether it's in there or not, you're not really gonna notice. Now whether these are in there at high enough levels to do anything with all the other stuff going on, I'm, I'm a little skeptical of that. Now, this brand features stats like 87% of people noticed reduced photo damage. But, you know, how did they get that? That looks like it's a survey. Users. And, you know, honestly, I've been involved in enough consumer surveys where you can pretty much get any kind of data you want for something like that. You know, how is a consumer going to notice reduced photo damage? Well, if you go out in the sun and you don't get sunburned, you say, oh, I didn't get photo damage. Well, of course you didn't, because, you know, you have sunscreen on. So, you know, I don't Put a lot of faith in the survey users or consumer reported results. Of course you're going to have good results. I would say, why Was it only 87%? Why didn't everybody notice? But you know, so this isn't controlled clinical data. These, I'm way skeptical of surveys. There's plenty of room for placebo and biases here. Now looking at some of the reviews of this, people say that it's smooth and it's a non white cast mineral spf. So it might be great for some people. But you know, like any kind of zinc oxide sunscreen, you're probably gonna have a slight cast to it. So if you have darker skin, it's, you know, it's probably, it's probably gonna show up a little bit there. So you know, that's just the nature of zinc oxide. It's just how it is. Unless you go to like nano, which you know, people kind of want to stay away from nano. But then I looked at this. The retail price is 148 for 30ml. That's hugely steep for a sunscreen. I mean sunscreen is expensive as it is. But this, this is ridiculous. This is probably one of the most expensive mineral sunscreens I've ever seen on the market. So. Wow. So, okay, so is pampas effective? I'm going to say yes, it's of course it's effective. It's zinc oxide based sunscreen. So definitely it's going to provide you your UV protection. And I have no doubt that they've done the as well. I have no reason to doubt that they've done the SPF testing. So if they says 30, it's an SPF 30. Is this a revolutionary product? There's nothing about it that seems revolutionary to me. You know, mostly it's the anti aging claims. They rely sort of just on marketing fluff and ingredients that you've seen everywhere else. There's no robust bust, independent evidence and $148 for 30amp mils. Wow. That for me is very hard to sell. You're paying super premium for branding, luxury packaging and then this proprietary zinc oxide blends which is just zinc. I mean there's plenty of better lower cost alternatives in my opinion that offer SPF 30 to 50. And the, you know, the formulas are good and you know, if antioxidants still intrigue you that much, I would suggest you just do a separate niacinamide serum or something to your routine. So Pavis is this luxury mineral sunscreen with this fancy story. But you know, the Core ingredients, the zinc oxide, that's. That's old news. And this, this diamond and glitter stuff, you know, that's. That's all just kind of marketing here. You're essentially paying for branding and exclusivity. There's not a lot of breakthrough science here. Okay, enough of just hearing my voice. We've got a real person who sent in an audio question.
Allie
Hi, beauty brains. I'm Allie. I live in a place with relatively hard water, and I notice a difference when I use certain clarifying products in my hair. I really like the Bumble and Bumble Sunday shampoo. I recently tried a sample of the Kerastase Premier hair mask and it was amazing. My hair felt so soft and nice and stayed feeling nice for days after, even after showering again with other products. Unfortunately, the mask is $100 for 200ml, which is a bit out of my grad student budget. I was wondering which ingredients might be the reason for my great results. So I could look for some alternatives that are more affordable.
Perry Romanowski
Well, Kerastase. Now, just so you know, Kerastase is produced by one of the biggest, well, the biggest beauty product producer in the world. L' Oreal Caristas. I think started out as an independent salon brand. But of course, as anything goes, once you get very popular, the big guys look at you and they buy you. That's like the exit strategy of most of these salon brands or beauty brands. You know, you build up an audience, get bought by a big guy and cash in. So that's what Kerastase eventually did. So let's look at this product. You use the Kerastase Premier mask filler reparteer, and love the results. That's cool. So you want to know what ingredients are responsible for your great hair day. Now I'm looking at it and you know what I see here? I see a hair conditioner. The ingredients that make it actually work. We've got behene, trimonium, methyl sulfate. I mean, you know, it's. And then of course, the cetearyl alcohol. It's a blend there. But this is pretty standard in conditioners, the mid tier conditioners. And you know, they're gonna make your hair feel soft and detangle. They're good, but not unique to Kerastase. So you'll find them in, you know, Tresma uses it, ogx, Shea Moisture. Lots of brands use that. Then we have Amodimethicone and aminopropanol dimethicone. Again, these are silicones and they selectively bind to damaged areas of your hair. And you know, they're shiny, they're smooth, they leave your hair feeling great. So they work. So those are ingredients. But you know what, they're found in there almost every other product, like say, I don't know, the Aussie Three Minute Miracle or Dove, you know, everybody uses it. There's nothing special here. Now they do have a hydrolyzed vegetable protein. You know, personally I think that just kind of gets rinsed out. This is, well, it's a protein silicone hybrid hybrid. So maybe it stays in, maybe get some benefit. I just think when you mix in those proteins and on rinse out product, they just kind of run down your drain. And then of course they have the moisturizers, emollients, butylene, butylene glycol. We have caprylic triglycerides, all pretty standard. So I'm not seeing anything in this product that is significantly different than what you might find in other products. Tresemme, Ogx, something like that. Now what makes it seem to work so well? Well, you know, you said you had hard water and you know, minerals like calcium, magnesium, they might be building up on your hair. And you know, the silicones are certainly going to help sort of mask that coated cuticle. They'll help fill in the gaps and so you're not going to be as affected by the hard water product problem. That silkier, glossier feel that you talk about is the silicones and conditioning agents. And you know, it's not really any miracle molecule, but I mean it works. And so if it works for you, that's great. Now I would suggest, if that happened to me, I'd say, hey, this product works great. Go to the store and look for the ingredients. So the first ingredient, of course everyone's going to start with water, cetearyl, alcohol, you know, acetyl or sterol alcohol. That's a same stuff. Look for something that has behene, trimonium sulfate and methyl sulfate and ammo dimethicone. Those are the two main ones there. Try those out. But honestly, just having that, the right fragrance, that, that helps make it better too. I mean kerastase is effective, you know, and if it's working in hard water, it's working for you. It's, it's silky hydrating, but you know, it's not really magic. The key ingredients, silicones, cationic surfactants, proteins and mollies, I mean they're all very common there. So I, I don't know what to tell you for. I mean you're paying for the Scent, the branding, the prestige. There's no novel cosmetic chemistry here. This seems like a pretty basic formula, a good formula. Don't get me wrong. Of course l' Oreal and Kerasace are going to put out good products, but I think you could, you know, get almost the same benefits for products that are well under, say, $15 or even $10. Although with inflation, you can buy something just as good for under 20 bucks. You just have to look up the ingredients and try that out. Okay, we got a question from a patron. Mishka asks, is there an ingredient or a combination of ingredients proven to help with under eye dark circles? I have been researching eye creams. They come in small volumes, they are expensive, and from what I found, ranging from $20 to $575. This is all so confusing. If you could provide a little clarity, that would help. Thank you. Well, this is a problem that people have had, well, for a long time. Under eyed dark circles, it's common, but treating them effectively really depends on understanding what is causing the problem here. So not all the dark circles are the same. You know, they may be caused by excess pigmentation, like, you know, post inflammatory discolorations or just your genetics. You just happen to have more melanin in, in that area. There is the vascular viability or visibility that's, you know, the, the skin is thinner there and you could see the blood vessels a little more, more easily. And so that can make it appear dark. It's a genetic thing. There's structural shadowing just the way your hair is shaped. If you have deep seated eyes or you lose a lot of fat, that can kind of make your eyes look darker or under your eyes. And then there's puffiness from, you know, fluid retention or allergies. And since there's no single problem here, so there's no single ingredient or cream that is going to universally fix everybody's dark circles. There just isn't. But you know, that said, there are some ingredients that, you know, have seemed to have been effective in the past, depending on the cause. So for example, there's puffiness and vascular shadows. Caffeine is probably the most well researched option here. And the way it works is it constricts the blood vessels and that can help to reduce swelling and, and now this effect is just temporary. But you know, it's, you know, you just, that's how cosmetics are. You just, just keep, it's a battle, it's a never ending battle that you just got to keep putting stuff on. And that's why the Cosmetic industry exists but so there's not a permanent fix, a temporary fix. But look for something with caffeine. Niacinamide is another ingredient that suggests, you know, has some data behind it. It's, you know, good for brightening and calming the skin. It's widely tolerated by most people, even by people with sensitive skin. So that's there. Another one is vitamin C. If it's properly stabilized, that might be able to reduce pigmentation. And you know, if you don't have it in a high enough level where it's going to sting, it can be effective. And then retinol is another ingredient there. So you see there's a lot of them. There's new, you know, peptides are out like Matrixyl 3000. They say it's offering this firming and anti aging benefits. But you know, all that data comes from the company. So you could try it. I, you know, that's one of these things is you just got to try a bunch of different things. I'd go in that order. You know, the caffeine and niacinamide first, the vitamin Cs and get down to the peptides later. Unfortunately, many of these pricey eye creams, they just really are just fancy moisturizers and packaging in a story because this isn't a problem that we figured out how to easily fix. Ingredients like, I don't know, gold snail slime, caviar. Of course they sound exotic and luxurious, but you know, they, there's not a lot of evidence that these things are helping collagen in your topical creams. Collagen is not gonna, if you put it on top of your skin, it's not going to help in any significant way way or provide any sort of lasting benefit. And despite the huge price tags, like you said, some of these products are over $500. You know, the value comes from just a few of the ingredients, not the exotic ingredients. And you know, you do not need to spend $500 on something that's doped with caffeine or niacinamide. You just don't. So you know, there are many affordable eye products that you can get try out. Like the Inkey List has this caffeine eye cream and Ordinary has one too. I would start trying those things out to see if it works on the one that is the, the reason that you particularly have this problem of darkening under the eyes. But ultimately if your dark circles are due to some sort of structural shadowing or genetic pigmentation, even the best cream may not make a dramatic difference. And in Such cases, you know, you know, cosmetic solutions like color correcting, concealers, or in office treatments like fillers or something, they might be more effective and you might want to go that route. However, you know, if your concern is just mild pigmentation or puffiness, you know, you can try caffeine, niacinamide and maybe a gentle retinol might be worthwhile to try out. I'm not saying it's necessarily going to work, but you know, it's better than nothing. And that's what beauty products are really all about, right? Just trying something, see if it works. And if you find something that works, don't even question it, just use it. If it works, it works. Now, if you're spending hundreds of dollars on something and it works, I would then say, okay, it works. Why does that work? And let me find something that's less expensive that can work just as well because it has some specific ingredient in it. That's always a good strategy to follow if you want to save some money on your beauty products. All right, we have time for one more question. Comes to us from Chiara. Chiara says, I live in Italy and by now it's already 20 degrees Celsius 20C. Let's see, that's about 68 degrees Fahrenheit for you North American or US people anyway. All right. And the UV index is already seven to eight peak hours. So my question is how do we practice sun safety diligently in the summer months? I feel most comfortable with European and Australian SPFs. In the past I have used the Altruist SPF 50, the Bondi Sans face sunscreen Garnier for the body. I have no particulars, so I'll just go with the cheapest sunscreen that I can find. And I find it easy to be diligent with face facial use and reapplication. Also, due to vanity, I find myself slacking off with the body application. So do you have any advice? Also, what are we using on the palms of our hands? I want to use a sufficient stick to avoid the sticky feeling on my fingers. Is that enough? Do you personally use UPF clothing together with your sunscreen? Also, since you quite often mention your travels, do you happen to have Euro sunscreen recommendations to share? Love listening to the pod. Well, thank you for those questions about sunscreen. I will say that sunscreen is very important, protecting yourself from the sun. And you're already ahead of the game by wearing by being aware of the UV index and using proven sunscreens like the ones you mentioned. Now, an index of 7 to 8 is pretty high, especially in the late spring in Italy. So daily protection is crucial for your health, not just for anti aging, but also, you know, cancer prevention. So there you go. And you're right that the European and Australian sunscreens, they tend to feel more wearable because they just have more UVA filters and UVB filters than you can find in the United States. And so that allows those formulators to make things that have, you know, more elegant feelings, feel products with a more elegant feel. And you know, someday maybe the United States will get their act together, but it's not anytime soon. That's always amuses me that people said, oh, Europe is so much less regulated or more regulated than the United States. But here's one where the United States is more regulated than Europe. So there's that anyway, so don't feel guilty for skipping some of the reef safe natural hype. The evidence shows broad spectrum chemical sunscreens are safe and effective. And the whole thing about reef safety is it's unproven science. I mean, maybe there's a problem, but the reality is the thing that's killing the coral reefs is not the sunscreen of people wearing it by them. It's the warming up of the planet and warming up of the oceans. And that's doing so much more damage than there's scant evidence that it's the sunscreen. But some people disagree on that. All right, let's talk about the face and the body reapplication. Now you're not alone in being great about your face, but less consistent about your body. And here's sort of some science backed low effort strategy. You can use body sunscreens that feel invisible. So lightweight gels, sprays, milk, textures like the Eucerin, the Garnier, you can use that. You know, Banana boat has theirs, you know, everybody has them. And to reapply they're less likely to trigger that, you know, greasy skin syndrome. You can also apply these things before you leave the house. So you could do the full body application, you know, once you get out of the shower or something. And that way you avoid missing any of the spots. And then you can also, you know, keep sunscreen in your car, your bag, and then just whenever you think of it, you do the lazy reapply. If you're going to the beach or you're going to hike or outside or something. So make it available for you and so that'll make it easier to reapply. Now honestly, for me, I don't, I forget to reapply I guess I try. My, My son's strategy is to wear long sleeves, you know, wear clothes. And as far as the clothes rating, I'm a little skeptical of this. This rating thing for clothes. I mean, yeah, the testing there, it doesn't seem to me to be really relevant. So, yeah, wear clothes. And if it's thin enough to see through, it's probably thin enough for sun to get through. But you'll know that because you'll get burned or something because. So I wear like a T shirt. The sun's not going through that T shirt. It's not burning me. So there's no, you know, the SPF of clothes is like a million or so. There's. There's. Literally. It's not something that I give. Think much. Now, you mentioned about the palms. You know, the palms on the hand aren't usually prone to sunburns, and that's because they're thicker and they're more keratinized. But, you know, it's good to be thinking about some hand exposure. And so especially the, the back of your hands. You know, back of your hands are not as protected as the palms. Palms are pretty protected. So I, I wouldn't worry too much about the palm exposure. It's. It's. It's not really an area. I mean, you could try to use like a makeup sponge or a puff and tap, a facial screen to, to reapply, but I wouldn't worry too much about that. As far as the clothing goes, worth it. You know, it's good to wear a hat. It keeps the sun off of your face. But, you know, these UPF ratings and things, I don't, I don't find them to be credible. So I, I wouldn't put a lot. I mean, yes, wear clothes. Okay. And the more clothes. Yeah. The more skin you cover up, the better, you know, Then you don't have to worry if you missed a spot or reapply your sunscreen or something like that. But that's pretty much my advice on that. Yeah, it's good to worry about. Wear your sunscreens, protect yourself from the sun, especially in the higher UVF ratings there. Do that. Wear as much clothing as you can. Feel comfortable. I always cover up when I go to the beach. Drives my wife nuts. But, you know, I don't get burned that way. And don't worry about that UPF rating. Clothes work. You know, speaking of that, I think I hear the music. Thanks for listening, everybody. If you get a chance, can you go over to Apple Podcasts or Spotify and leave us a review that's going to help other people find the show and ensure that we have a full docket of beauty questions to answer. Speaking of questions, if you have have one and you want to get your voice on the show, just record it on your smartphone and email it to thebeautybrainsmail.com or you can just use the form that I have in the show notes. Just answer the form there. The Beauty Brains are also on Patreon. If you like what we do here and we don't have commercials to support it, that's because we are supported by our patrons. If you want to help support the show and cover some of the cost of making a show, go to patreon.com thebeautybrains and subscribe at any level. Also, you can follow us on our various social media accounts. On Instagram, we're hebeautybrains 2018 on X, we're @the BeautyBrains. On Blue sky, we're also @the BeautyBrains and we have a Facebook page, a TikTok page. And now, just starting now, all of our podcasts are going to be up on YouTube. Gee, now it's just a static picture and the audio, but you can play it through YouTube and apparently a lot of people listen to podcasts that way. So thanks again for listening everybody. And remember, as Valerie always says, be brainy about your beauty. Thanks everyone. Kittens.
Release Date: July 19, 2025
Host: Perry Romanowski
Description: Real scientists answer your beauty questions
Episode Title: Mushrooms, Diamond Dust, and Dark Circle Serums
In this solo episode of The Beauty Brains (#402), host Perry Romanowski addresses various beauty product inquiries while Valerie, his co-host, is away caring for her newborn. Perry outlines the episode's main topics, including the efficacy of IS Clinical Hydracool products, the anti-aging benefits of Pavis sunscreen, key ingredients in effective conditioners, solutions for under-eye dark circles, and diligent sun safety practices.
Perry delves into the ongoing debate between natural/organic and synthetic cosmetic products. He expresses frustration with the marketing tactics that equate "natural" with superior quality, emphasizing that "Natural is not better. Cosmetics are not natural." [05:30]
Key Points:
Misconceptions About Natural Products: Perry argues that most cosmetics are synthetic as they require processing and formulation not achievable by nature alone. Only single-ingredient products like coconut oil can be considered truly natural.
Safety Concerns: Contrary to popular belief, natural ingredients are not inherently safer. Perry notes, "Nature doesn't care about your skin or your hair... Even petrolatum that you get from petroleum and from oil. Oil's natural." [10:15] He highlights that many natural substances can cause allergic reactions or skin irritation.
Environmental Impact: Organic farming for cosmetic ingredients can exacerbate environmental issues by using more land and water, and harvesting rare plants threatens biodiversity. Perry points out, "Organic farming... is actually contributing to the loss of biodiversity." [15:45]
Performance and Efficacy: Synthetic ingredients often outperform natural ones. For instance, Perry contrasts natural shellac with synthetic polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), which offers better functionality in hair products.
Marketing vs. Reality: The natural cosmetic market heavily relies on branding and consumer perception rather than scientific efficacy. Perry criticizes this by stating, "It's pure branding... they're selling you an identity." [22:10]
Conclusion: Perry advocates for focusing on scientifically proven ingredients regardless of their natural or synthetic origin, urging consumers to prioritize efficacy over marketing claims.
a. IS Clinical Hydracool Products and Rosacea
Question by Deb [23:05]: Deb inquires about the suitability of IS Clinical's Hydracool Hyaluronic Acid Serum and Pro Heal Serum for her rosacea-prone skin.
Perry's Analysis:
Hydracool Serum: Contains hyaluronic acid, panthenol, pentalene glycol, mushrooms, and centella extracts. Perry critiques its high price ($100+) and notes that similar hydration can be achieved with more affordable products like glycerin-based serums. He states, "Hyaluronic acid is everywhere... glycerin is perfectly fine compared to hyaluronic acid." [24:00]
Pro Heal Serum: Combines vitamin C, vitamin E, olive leaf extract, zinc sulfate, retinol, and kojic acid. Perry raises concerns about ingredient stability and potential irritation for sensitive skin, highlighting the lack of published clinical trials to support its claims. He advises Deb to consider simpler, fragrance-free products tailored for barrier repair, such as those from La Roche-Posay or The Ordinary. "If you have a concern about rosacea... it's not really promising." [26:20]
Conclusion: Perry recommends more straightforward skincare solutions for rosacea rather than expensive, complex formulations that may not offer additional benefits.
b. Pavis Sunscreen Effectiveness
Question by Angela [28:15]: Angela seeks opinions on the anti-aging and sun protection efficacy of Pavis sunscreen, particularly its diamond core technology and high price point.
Perry's Analysis:
Active Ingredients: Pavis uses 15% zinc oxide, a well-established mineral sunscreen agent. Perry acknowledges its effectiveness but finds no innovation compared to other zinc oxide-based sunscreens. "It's effective and safe... it's zinc oxide based sunscreen." [29:00]
Diamond Core Technology: He dismisses the claims of reducing 80% of reactive oxygen species without presenting scientific evidence, labeling it as a marketing gimmick. "That's purely marketing spin because... it's just zinc oxide mixed with diamond powder." [31:45]
Cost vs. Performance: At $148 for 30ml, Pavis is significantly more expensive than comparable sunscreens. Perry emphasizes, "There's nothing revolutionary... you're paying super premium for branding." [34:10]
SPF and PA Ratings: He discusses the differences in SPF (licensed in the US) and PA (more common in Europe and Korea), criticizing the lack of regulation and reliability in PA ratings. "The PA, which indicates a UVA protection... there's no good way to test for UVA protection." [36:30]
Conclusion: While Pavis sunscreen is effective due to its zinc oxide content, Perry finds it overpriced with no substantial benefits over more affordable alternatives.
c. Effective Conditioner Ingredients
Question by Allie [40:00]: Allie, a grad student, praises the Kerastase Premier hair mask for its excellent results but is concerned about its $100 price tag. She seeks insights into which ingredients contribute to its efficacy to find more affordable alternatives.
Perry's Analysis:
Ingredient Breakdown: The mask includes standard conditioning agents like behenyltrimonium chloride, cetearyl alcohol, amodimethicone, and hydrolyzed vegetable protein. Perry notes that these ingredients are common across various mid-tier brands and contribute to the mask's smoothing and moisturizing effects. "There's nothing special here... it's a pretty basic formula." [42:15]
Effectiveness in Hard Water: The positive results Allie experiences are likely due to silicones and conditioning agents that mitigate the effects of hard water by coating the hair cuticle. "The silicones... help fill in the gaps... you're not going to be as affected by the hard water product problem." [43:50]
Cost vs. Ingredients: Perry highlights that similar benefits can be achieved with much cheaper products by selecting those with comparable ingredient profiles. "You could get almost the same benefits for products that are well under $15 or even $10." [45:30]
Conclusion: Allie can achieve comparable hair conditioning benefits by opting for more affordable products containing similar silicones and conditioning agents found in the Kerastase mask.
d. Addressing Under-Eye Dark Circles
Question by Mishka [50:25]: Mishka seeks advice on effective ingredients or combinations to combat under-eye dark circles, noting the wide price range of eye creams.
Perry's Analysis:
Causes of Dark Circles: Perry explains that dark circles can result from excess pigmentation, vascular visibility, structural shadowing, or puffiness due to fluid retention or allergies. "There isn't a single ingredient or cream that is going to universally fix everybody's dark circles." [51:10]
Effective Ingredients:
Skepticism Towards Exotic Ingredients: Perry criticizes high-priced eye creams laden with exotic ingredients like gold or caviar, stating, "Despite the huge price tags... you just don't need to spend $500 on something that's doped with caffeine or niacinamide." [57:30]
Conclusion: Mishka should focus on affordable eye creams containing caffeine, niacinamide, and possibly vitamin C or retinol, while avoiding overpriced products with dubious exotic ingredients.
e. Sun Safety During Summer
Question by Chiara [60:00]: Chiara from Italy seeks advice on practicing diligent sun safety during high UV index days, expressing concerns about reapplying sunscreen on the body and protecting her hands without a sticky residue.
Perry's Analysis:
Sunscreen Efficacy: Acknowledges the importance of using proven sunscreens, especially with UV indexes of 7-8, for both anti-aging and cancer prevention. "Daily protection is crucial for your health." [61:15]
Reapplication Strategies: Suggests using lightweight, invisible body sunscreens and keeping sunscreen accessible (e.g., in a car or bag) to facilitate easy reapplication. "Use skins that feel invisible... so reapplication is less likely to trigger greasy skin syndrome." [63:40]
Clothing and Accessories: While skeptical about UPF ratings, Perry recommends wearing protective clothing and hats to minimize sun exposure. "Wear clothes. The more clothes you cover up, the better." [66:10]
Palm Protection: Notes that palms are less susceptible to sunburn due to their thickness but advises applying sunscreen to the backs of hands as needed. "Don't worry too much about palm exposure." [67:45]
Environmental Considerations: Dismisses the notion that sunscreen is a major threat to coral reefs, attributing more significant damage to climate change. "It's the warming up of the planet and oceans doing so much more damage." [70:30]
Conclusion: Chiara should continue using effective sunscreens, prioritize reapplication for her body, protect exposed areas with clothing, and not overly concern herself with the environmental impact of her sunscreen choices.
Throughout the episode, Perry emphasizes the importance of evidence-based approaches in selecting beauty products. He encourages listeners to critically evaluate marketing claims, prioritize ingredient efficacy over branding, and seek affordable alternatives without compromising on performance. His insights aim to empower consumers to make informed decisions, ensuring that their beauty routines are both effective and cost-efficient.
Notable Quotes:
Remember: As Perry aptly puts it, *"Be brainy about your beauty."* Ensuring that your beauty regimen is grounded in scientific evidence will lead to better outcomes and more satisfying results.