Loading summary
A
At blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments. It's about you. Your style, your space, your way. Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right. From free expert design help to our 100% satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows. Because@blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you. Black Friday deals are going on all month long. Save up to 45% off site wide plus an additional 10% off every order. Right now at blinds.com rules and restrictions apply. Daily Wire plus annual memberships are 50% off during our Black Friday sale.
B
That includes inside, annual and all access memberships. There's more to enjoy than ever before.
C
That means more new daily shows from the most trusted voices in conservative media, uncensored, ad free and available an hour before you can see or hear them anywhere else.
A
More new series that capture conviction, courage and the human story. More documentaries that challenge the culture and expose what's really happening.
B
And when we say premium, we're proving it with the long awaited seven part epic series, the Pendragon Cycle. Rise of the Merlin the Legend begins.
A
Streaming January 22, 2026, exclusively on Daily Wire. All Access members get early access to episodes one and two at Christmas Day.
C
50% off. Black Friday is our biggest sale of the year.
B
It only happens once a year. When it's gone, it's gone.
A
Go to dailywire.com subscribe and join now.
B
Okay folks, so I did it. I saw Wicked Part 2 for good and here is my full review. This review is sponsored by our friends at ExpressVP. Alrighty. So as you know, I'm a musical theater junkie and when it comes to Wicked, I wanna talk about the problems with the musical before I get to the actual movie because I don't think it's quite fair to evaluate Wicked the movie without understanding the musical upon which it is based. Cause obviously it's an adaptation. So Wicked the Musical has a problem. The first act to Wicked the Musical is excellent. Like Very Very Good has a bunch of hit songs ranging from Popular to Defying Gravity. Now go look at my first review for all of that. The problem with Wicked the Musical is that the second act is really weak. Now this is not unique to Wicked the Musical. And again, this is not a rip on Stephen Schwartz or on the librettist for the play. It is a rip on the musical in the sense that a lot of act twos in famous musicals are just not as good as Act 1. And there's a reason for that. Typically when you are writing a screenplay or if you're writing just a spoken play, there are three acts. There's act one, act two, act three. And usually the action is somewhat evenly divided between Act 1, Act 2 and Act 3. Musicals are written in two acts. Typically there's an intermission between Act 1 and Act 2. Very often what tends to happen for librettists, the people who are writing the so called book, the script for the thing. Typically what tends to happen is that the librettist will stack what would in a normal play be Act 1 and Act 2. They'll stack all that in Act 1. So a lot of the action happens in Act 1. And then Act 2 would be equivalent to the Act 3 in the play. And so one third of the action takes place in like half of the musical. And so what you end up with is a bunch of filler. So even musicals that I absolutely adore are very often have a bunch of filler in them that is necessary to sort of take up time. So if you take sort of the original Broadway classic musical, Oklahoma, the first half of the musical works beautifully. The second half of the musical, they need some filler. And so they end up having a dream sequence with the ballet. And this was kind of the old school way of solving for the fact that a second act is not fully plotted. That happens in Wicked. So a lot of the action, a lot of the best songs are in Act 1, which would have been the first movie. Act 2, which is the second movie, really is thin on plot. And there are a lot of plot holes in Wicked. The second act, the end of the first movie, is that Galinda and Elphaba realize that the wizard is bad and that he's doing bad things. And Elphaba takes off, right? She's gonna defy gravity. She's gonna lead a revolution. She asks Glinda to come. Galinda says, no, I don't have the strength of character to just join you in the revolution. I'm going to stay here and you take off. Fine. So now what you expect to happen in Act 2 is that Elphaba does in fact lead a revolution. Instead, Elphaba kind of flies around and does sporadic things that are annoying to the regime without actually leading a revolution. And Galinda sticks around knowing how evil the wizard is. Presumably because she's getting the benefit of the bargain. Because Fiyero, who ends up being the Scarecrow, presumably cause she thinks she's in love with Fierro. She's getting the benefit of the bargain. Fierro ends up leaving her, going to Elphaba. And then she kind of turns on Elphaba briefly. This ends unintentionally with the death of Elphaba's sister. Boom. Who is the Wicked Witch of the East? The Wicked Witch of the east, bro. Act two starts, and Elphaba is off kind of raising hell. And Galinda. This is the beginning of the movie. Galinda is singing to everybody about how things are wonderful, and she's now the face of the regime. Well, fairly early on in Act 2, there's another scene where she gets together with Elphaba and brings her to the Wizard. And they have another scene where it looks like they might get back together and everything's gonna be okay. That's super weird. Nothing's changed. Why precisely is it that Elphaba would think that she could get away with working with the Wizard? She knows he's bad already. Also, Elphaba is by far the most powerful person in the entire universe of Oz here. So if she wants to take out the wizard in any way, she wants to put him on a hot air balloon and float him away, he doesn't have any power. She can do whatever she wants to get rid of. She doesn't do any of that. Instead, the conflict just kind of simmers and broils. And the only real plot changes that happen in Act 2 are the death of the Wicked Witch of the East. Sort of unintentionally at Galinda's hands, but really at the hands of the wizard and of his henchwoman, Madame Morrible. And then Fiyero going to Elphaba, and then you get to the end. So there's not a lot of plot in Act 2, and the plot is kind of relentlessly dark and the motivations are somewhat confusing. That's all a problem with the original musical that really has nothing to do with the movie, per se. And so I don't want to judge the movie as an independent vehicle because it's not. It's working off the source material. This means that the biggest criticism of Wicked for Good is that Wicked for Good and Wicked, the original, should have been one movie. You could have solved all of these problems and, in fact, fixed a lot of the plot holes by making this all one movie. The first movie is about 40 minutes too long, and the second movie is about an hour too long, maybe 40 minutes too long. There's a bunch of filler in the second movie. In Wicked For Good, there's a flashback scene of Galinda when she's a kid that you totally don't need. For example, there are two additional songs. Knowing that the second act is weak. Stephen Schwartz wrote two more additional songs just for the movie. One of them is a song that Elphaba sings to the animals called there's no Place Like Home, which of course, is a riff on the original wizard of Oz. And then the second song is a solo number by Glinda. I believe it's titled the Girl in the Bubble, because she, of course, is in the bubble. Neither of these songs is particularly memorable, and this is the biggest problem with Wicked For Good is that basically there is one good number in Wicked For Good, and it's the last number for Good, which is a great number. That's a legitimately great musical theater number. But there are a bunch of other numbers that just don't really go anywhere. And again, that's a critique of the original musical and speaks to the fact that some of the best movie adaptations of musicals are condensations of the material. So west side Story is a good example of a show that had a weak second act and that had a ballet in the middle of it. They just removed the ballet. It doesn't exist in the actual movie musical. And they shifted Officer Krupke from what used to be later in the musical to much earlier in the musical. You can make changes when you make a movie adaptation that don't have to be on the stage. And that's the single problem I would say, with the Wicked movies is that they should have done this. They should have made the entire musical two and a half hours, two hours, 45. They should have cut out a lot of the fat. They should have restructured the second act somewhat to make more kind of plot sense. And that would have been. So it's really a missed opportunity in that way, as opposed to a problem with the movies per se. It's not a critique of the movies as they are. More it's a critique of what they could have been if they had not tried to turn it into two separate, longer movies. Alrighty, folks, we'll get to more on my review of Wicked For Good in a moment. First, you know that creepy feeling you get sometimes, like you're being watched while browsing online? Well, here's the thing. You actually are. Every time you hop on the Internet, your service provider can see literally all the things you're doing. And get this. In the United States, they can legally sell your entire browsing history. Yep, even that incognito browsing isn't so private after all. Who would have thunk? That's why I started using ExpressVPN. It's a brilliant app that encrypts everything I do online and routes it through secure servers. Since I started using it, my Internet provider can't see any of my browsing history. And that means they've got nothing to sell because they don't really have anything on me. I use ExpressVPN all the time when I'm traveling, when I'm at home. Just my data is my business and I want to protect it. Here's what I really love about ExpressVPN. It also hides my IP address so those annoying data brokers can't build a profile about me to send to advertisers. Plus, it's incredibly user friendly. You don't have to be a tech wizard to use it. They made it so simple even your kids could figure it out. All you have to do is tap one button to get protected. They've got apps for all your devices. It's rated number one by cnet, the Verge, and major tech reviewers. Find out how you can get four months free by scanning that QR code on screen, clicking the link in the description box below, or by heading on over to expressvpn.com benyt okay, now as to the actual content of the movie. Putting aside the plot problems again, musically the numbers are not nearly as good as the numbers in the first part of Wicked. This is not to denigrate the talents of the people who are working here. The guy who plays Fiero, Jonathan Bailey, is talented. He's good on screen. He just doesn't have a whole hell of a lot to do. He has one number with Cynthia Erivo that is an okay number. It's not like a great ballad. It's kind of all right. Otherwise he doesn't have much to do. Cynthia Erivo, who is the most talented member of the cast. As I discussed in the first wicket, I thought she was terrific. She really doesn't have a lot to do in the second act of Wicked. One of the things that happens in the show is that the focus really shifts fairly heavily from Elphaba and her kind of travails in the first act to Galinda and her travails in the second act. So Ariana Grande does turn in a very good performance here. So I wasn't a huge fan of her in the first part of Wicked. I think she's really good actually in Wicked for good I think that her actual dramatic performance is the strongest part of what she does. She's never gonna have Cynthia Erivo's voice. She's not. Cynthia Erivo has pipes. Ariana Grande can hit notes, but she doesn't have the power behind the note that Cynthia Erivo has. She just. Her voice isn't as full. And so when they sing for good at the end, Cynthia Erivo can belt in a way that Aria Grande just cannot. Again, it's not a rip on her voice. It is what it is. As an actress, she does a very good job with this part. As an actress, she has a lot to do, a lot more to do than Cynthia Erivo does. And so Cynthia Erivo is kind of playing Bitter the entire second act. From that perspective, I think that Ariana Grande owns the movie. And she's probably gonna receive a supporting actor nomination, probably because they'll try to nominate both, I would imagine, as supporting actresses, even though both are actually the lead actresses. Or they'll try to say that Cynthia Erivo is the lead and Ariana Grande is supporting, and she probably deserves a supporting actress nomination if that's the category that she falls into. It's a very good performance by Ariana Grande. The supporting roles, I think, are lackluster. Aside from Jonathan Bailey, who, again, does a good job with minimal material, I'd say Jeff Goldblum is meh. Michelle Yeoh. She's just miscast. She was miscast in the first movie. She's miscast here. She can't really sing particularly well. The special effects are kind of overwhelming in this movie in a way they weren't in the first movie. In the first movie, there's a lot more, I would say, interesting choreography, again, because the numbers are themselves more interesting. One thing visually that the director does that I like a lot is the take on Bach. So Bach, for those who have not seen the musical or the movie yet. And again, spoiler alert. I'm just speaking frankly about everything that's in here. Bach becomes the Tin man, right? He is one of the munchkins, Nessa, who becomes a Wicked Witch of the east and is increasingly sort of perverted by her love for Bok, who doesn't love her back. She basically tries to keep him there, and then she ends up trying to steal his heart. And stealing his heart. That forces Elphaba to turn him into the Tin man so he can survive. The graphic depiction of the Tin man is really effective, and you can see why Bok becomes almost a villainous character going after the Wicked Witch of the west because he feels that she's the one who turned him into the Tin Man. And that is visually quite effective. Actually, the special effects around the scarecrow are not nearly as effective. The visual effects of Elphaba flying, there are a couple of moments where it sort of takes you out of the story very early on. There's a point where she's almost surfing on her broom and it's totally unnecessary. She'll just jump on the broom and be done with it. Overall, again, I think performances are fine. I think that the Ariana Grande performance is very good. I think the Elphaba Cynthia Erivo performance is good. It's not nearly as showy as sort of her first performance in the first part of Wicked. I do have a quibble with the final number. Again, I think Forgood is a tremendous number. It's a really, really good musical theater number at the very end. And this is sort of my problem with John Chu as a director. He feels the necessity to hammer his points home with a brick. The very last number, Elphaba is singing with Galinda and they're singing about how they made each other better because of their friendship. And then there is the sort of Back into the. Back into the Future, right? Because the whole musical's a flashback back into the future where Galinda's explaining everything to the Munchkins. She doesn't tell them the full truth, but she's singing and she's talking about how they were friends. And there's a bit of a reprise of For Good. And at the very end, there's a split screen with Galinda and Elphaba and they're in two different places, but they're thinking about each other, and that's all very nice. And then Galinda basically has Elphaba's powers transferred to her so she can actually be magic, which is the thing that she's wanted all along. That's all very nice. And then at the very, very, very end, like the last image of the film, the John Chu decided to put a cutaway, like just a kind of insert shot of Elphaba and Glinda in better days, when they were just kind of like, out for a picnic. It's totally just banging you over the head. It's unnecessary. You don't need that at all. And it took me out of the picture at the very end, which was kind of annoying. But overall, I think the movie is fine. Like, on a scale of 1 to 10, if I thought that the first movie was like an 8 out of 10 or a 9 out of 10. I think the second movie is more like a 7 out of 10. Some of that is just due to the underlying material, which is weaker than Wicked Part one, the original Wicked for good. It's just act two is weaker. The biggest critique is all should have been one movie. And then there's the sort of politics of the underlying material again, which. The politics of the underlying material is that people need to be lied to by their leaders, which is a very weird takeaway. Right. The wizard lies to the people about who he is and about who Elphaba is. And by the end, Galinda is now lying to the people kind of about who she is, who the wizard is, who Elphaba was. And yeah, it's kind of a dark message about the nature of democracy and what you're supposed to be telling people. It's almost a platonic lie that you're supposed to be telling people. And it's kind of interesting. The musical skirts that and treats the people as though they're utterly incapable of hearing basic truths about the universe. It's something that I disagree with on a fundamental level. I think it's actually the job of leaders to tell the people the things that they don't want to hear, but that happen to be true. Also, I'd be remiss if I didn't at least comment briefly on the sort of bizarre PR campaign that's been running from Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo.
A
Not the Time Helicopter.
B
It's gone quite viral in sort of LGBTQ divided by sign circles, the sort of interpersonal relationship between the two, the sort of fanfic that's happening that all undermines the message of the musical. Obviously none of the musical works. If there is some sort of sexual attraction between Galinda and Elphaba, that's just not the nature of the musical. There are plenty, plenty of LGBTQ minus divided by sign oriented musicals. This happens not to be one of them in the main. The attempt to kind of fit it into that box is strange and undermines the friendship basis that is the underlying theme of both the film and the musical in general. And so just as a PR matter, I think it's kind of a strange approach to the PR overall. Was I disappointed by it? I wasn't disappointed by it. Did I think it was the greatest thing ever put on film? I didn't think that either. And so I'm sorry not to be able to give it like a rave, rave, rave review. The only way I think I would have been able to give it a rave review is if the fundamental sin had been corrected at the beginning, there should have been one film. The film should have been 2 hours and 40 minutes. They should have cut out a lot of the fat. They should have restructured the second act. And when you have a second bite at the apple like you do with Wicked, with this big gigantic budget and a huge fan base, making it more coherent. If you're gonna add songs, make them bangers, make them like really great songs. That would have been the thing. So I'm more sort of mildly annoyed with the fact that it wasn't what it could have been, but I'm certainly not disappointed with what it ended up being. I am going to. That was totally wicked.
A
Limu Emu and Doug Here we have the Limu emu in its natural habitat, helping people customize their car insurance and save hundreds with Liberty Mutual. Fascinating. It's accompanied by his natural ally, Doug.
B
Limu is that guy with the binoculars watching us.
A
Cut the camera. They see us. Only pay for what you need@libertymutual.com Liberty Liberty Liberty Liberty Savings vary underwritten by.
B
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and affiliates excludes.
C
Massachusetts Ordinary checking a $300 head start on checking Ordinary savings High yield savings that grow your money Ordinary mortgage A mortgage with a rate that drops when the market does. Why settle for With Oregon State Credit Union you get all sorts of welcome to human to human banking Oregon State Credit Union insured by NCOA equal housing lender $25 minimum balance required subject to change terms and conditions.
Episode: Ben Shapiro Reviews "Wicked: For Good"
Date: November 22, 2025
Host: Ben Shapiro (The Daily Wire)
In this episode, Ben Shapiro delivers a comprehensive, critical review of Wicked: For Good, the film sequel to the original Wicked musical adaptation. Approaching the review as both a longtime musical theater fan and a pop culture commentator, Shapiro analyzes the strengths and fundamental flaws carried over from the source material, the adaptation choices, performances by the cast, and notable cultural or political messaging. He also reflects on adaptation strategies, contemporary PR campaigns surrounding the film, and the implications for both the franchise and musical theater at large.
On Structure and Pacing:
"So what you end up with is a bunch of filler. So even musicals that I absolutely adore are very often have a bunch of filler in them that is necessary to sort of take up time." (03:24)
On Adaptation Failure:
"The biggest criticism of Wicked For Good is that Wicked for Good and Wicked, the original, should have been one movie." (07:08)
On Ariana Grande’s Performance:
"As an actress, she does a very good job with this part. As an actress, she has a lot to do, a lot more to do than Cynthia Erivo does. And so Cynthia Erivo is kind of playing bitter the entire second act. From that perspective, I think that Ariana Grande owns the movie." (10:35)
On Jon Chu’s Direction:
"He feels the necessity to hammer his points home with a brick. [...] It took me out of the picture at the very end, which was kind of annoying." (13:25, 15:07)
On the Film’s Message:
"It's almost a platonic lie that you're supposed to be telling people. And it's kind of interesting. The musical skirts that and treats the people as though they're utterly incapable of hearing basic truths about the universe. It's something that I disagree with on a fundamental level." (14:07)
Final Movie Rating:
"If I thought that the first movie was like an 8 out of 10 or a 9 out of 10. I think the second movie is more like a 7 out of 10. Some of that is just due to the underlying material, which is weaker than Wicked Part one, the original Wicked for good." (13:51)
| Segment | Timestamp | Summary / Quote | |-----------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Act 2 Structure Problem | 03:03 | "a lot of act twos in famous musicals are just not as good as Act 1." | | Elphaba’s Revolution Weakness | 05:45 | "Elphaba kind of flies around and does sporadic things that are annoying to the regime without actually leading a revolution." | | Adaptation Should Be One Film | 07:08 | "Wicked for Good and Wicked, the original, should have been one movie." | | New Songs Are Forgettable | 08:03 | "Neither of these songs is particularly memorable [...]" | | Cast Performance Highlights | 10:11-10:53 | "Ariana Grande owns the movie." "Cynthia Erivo can belt in a way that Ariana Grande just cannot." | | Special Effects & Tin Man Transformation| 12:09 | "The graphic depiction of the Tin man is really effective." | | Jon Chu’s Overwrought Ending | 13:25, 15:07 | "He feels the necessity to hammer his points home with a brick." "It took me out of the picture at the very end."| | Morality of Truth in Leadership | 13:57-14:23 | "The politics of the underlying material is that people need to be lied to by their leaders, which is a very weird takeaway." | | PR & Fan Campaign Concerns | 14:33 | "The attempt to kind of fit it into that box is strange and undermines the friendship basis that is the underlying theme."| | Overall Rating & Final Thoughts | 13:51, 15:16 | "If I thought that the first movie was like an 8[...] the second movie is more like a 7 out of 10." "I wasn't disappointed by it." |
Ben Shapiro's review of Wicked: For Good is deeply informed by his background in musical theater fandom and critical analysis. While he acknowledges solid performances (especially from Ariana Grande), and effective visual moments (notably the Tin Man transformation), he believes both the film and its source material are ultimately hamstrung by structural weaknesses, unnecessarily prolonged run times, and missed opportunities to streamline and elevate the story. Shapiro’s reflections extend beyond the screen, questioning the film’s moral messaging and contemporary cultural reinterpretations, all delivered in his typical incisive, rapid-fire tone.
Final take: “That was totally wicked”—but it could have been better.