Ep. 2161 - NASA Astronauts Return, Trump Brokers Putin CEASEFIRE?!

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Ben Shapiro Show Episode: Ep. 2161 - NASA Astronauts Return, Trump Brokers Putin CEASEFIRE?! Release Date: March 19, 2025

---

1. NASA Astronauts' Extended Mission and Return

Timestamp: 05:30

Ben Shapiro kicks off the episode by discussing the recent return of NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Butch Wilmore from the International Space Station (ISS). Originally slated for an eight-day mission aboard the Boeing Starliner, the astronauts ended up spending 286 days in space, a duration nearly equivalent to a year rather than the planned vacation-like stint.

Notable Quote:

Ben Shapiro (05:45): "Imagine telling your family you're going to space for a week and nearly a year later, you're still up there. That's not exactly great for family dynamics."

Shapiro criticizes the Biden administration's failure to collaborate effectively with Elon Musk’s SpaceX to expedite the astronauts' return, highlighting a significant shift as the Trump administration takes charge. He humorously suggests the potential for a "rom-com" scenario arising from Musk’s SpaceX rescue operation.

The astronauts themselves expressed willingness to stay longer to conduct scientific experiments and perform maintenance, although Shapiro speculates it must have been monotonous after a year in space. Shapiro also delves into the physical toll of prolonged space missions, referencing information from Perplexity:

Notable Quote:

Perplexity (08:15): "A year-long stint in space results in musculoskeletal changes, bone density loss, muscle atrophy, fluid shifts, arterial stiffness, vision problems, and space anemia."

Shapiro underscores the resilience required for space travel and commends Elon Musk and SpaceX for successfully bringing the astronauts home.

---

2. President Trump's Historic Call with Vladimir Putin

Timestamp: 15:20

A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to analyzing President Donald Trump's two-hour phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Shapiro notes discrepancies between the American and Russian accounts of the call but remains cautiously optimistic about the potential for a ceasefire in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war.

Notable Quote:

Ben Shapiro (16:05): "President Trump stated, 'We agreed to an immediate ceasefire on all energy and infrastructure,' but the Kremlin's interpretation seems limited to only certain sectors."

Shapiro highlights that while the U.S. claims a broader ceasefire agreement, Russian actions—such as a guided bomb attack shortly after the announcement—suggest a more constrained commitment. He points out that Ukraine appears more willing to engage in comprehensive ceasefire talks compared to Putin's selective approach.

The discussion delves into Putin's negotiating tactics, including his deliberate delays and perceived disrespect during the call, which Shapiro interprets as a strategy to maintain military momentum. The episode also touches on the release of prisoners of war as a partial success from the negotiations.

Notable Quote:

President Trump (22:30): "This war would never have started if I were president. We are working towards a complete ceasefire and an end to this very horrible war between Russia and Ukraine."

Shapiro critiques the Kremlin's stance, emphasizing that demands such as halting all Western arms supplies to Ukraine are unrealistic and would severely disadvantage Ukrainian defenses. He warns against the U.S. considering Russia's limited commitments as a basis for further negotiations.

---

3. Judicial Battles and the Trump Administration's Challenges

Timestamp: 28:50

Shapiro transitions to domestic issues, focusing on the ongoing judicial conflicts faced by the Trump administration. He discusses President Trump's demand to impeach a federal judge overseeing the removal of members from the Trenda Aragua gang under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which led to Chief Justice John Roberts publicly reprimanding Trump.

Notable Quote:

Chief Justice Roberts (31:10): "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision."

Shapiro points out the constitutional boundaries of impeachment, arguing that Roberts' intervention is more about preserving judicial integrity than addressing any substantive issue with Trump's actions. He further explores the administration's legal battles, including attempts to dismantle USAID and the controversial firing of Democratic FTC commissioners, predicting potential Supreme Court involvement.

---

4. Economic Concerns: Stock Market Volatility and Federal Reserve Policies

Timestamp: 35:50

Addressing economic topics, Shapiro analyzes recent stock market fluctuations, attributing the instability to investor uncertainty and Federal Reserve policies. He explains that despite discussions about lowering interest rates, persistent inflation remains a significant challenge, keeping the Fed's options limited.

Notable Quote:

Wall Street Journal (38:10): "Jerome Powell faces the challenge of preserving the Federal Reserve's apolitical DNA while navigating a trade war that threatens to push prices up and weaken the economy."

Shapiro expresses skepticism about the Federal Reserve's likelihood to reduce interest rates, suggesting that if inflation accelerates, rates may actually increase. He also scrutinizes President Trump's tariff proposals, highlighting the complexities and potential economic repercussions of implementing reciprocal tariffs.

---

5. Release of JFK Assassination Documents

Timestamp: 34:00

In a lighter segment, Shapiro discusses President Trump's recent announcement about releasing 80,000 pages of JFK assassination documents. He anticipates that, similar to previous releases, these new documents will reaffirm the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.

Notable Quote:

Donald Trump (34:25): "We are tomorrow announcing and giving all of the Kennedy files. I don't believe we're going to redact anything."

Shapiro cites historians' expectations that the release will not provide groundbreaking new evidence but will instead reinforce established narratives. He promotes the Daily Wire’s series, "Debunked," which delves deeper into JFK's assassination, urging listeners to seek transparency.

---

6. Democratic Party Struggles and Internal Conflicts

Timestamp: 42:00

The episode shifts focus to the internal struggles within the Democratic Party, particularly criticizing Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. Shapiro condemns Schumer's stance on anti-Semitism and his handling of recent political maneuvers, including the firing of committee members.

Notable Quote:

Ben Shapiro (43:00): "Chuck Schumer, you do not get to speak as a Jew about how you're fighting anti-Semitism while you greenlit the Iran nuclear deal and made room for every anti-Israel, anti-Semitic person in your party."

Shapiro mocks the Democrats' inability to effectively manage their base and leadership, highlighting Schumer's canceled book tour due to backlash over government funding votes. He underscores the perceived hypocrisy and ineffectiveness within the party leadership.

---

7. Vice President J.D. Vance's Role in Trade Policy

Timestamp: 28:48

Focusing on trade policy, Shapiro analyzes Vice President J.D. Vance's involvement in shaping President Trump's tariff agenda. Vance advocates for tariffs as tools to protect American jobs and industries, aligning with the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) protectionist stance.

Notable Quote:

J.D. Vance (28:48): "Tariffs are a necessary tool to protect our jobs and our industries from other countries as well as the labor value of our workers in a globalized market."

Shapiro critiques the practicality of reciprocal tariffs, questioning their economic efficacy and potential to stifle consumer benefits. He debates the balance between protectionism and fostering innovation, arguing that tariffs often hinder rather than help long-term economic growth.

---

8. Advertising Breaks and Promotions

Throughout the episode, Shapiro includes several promotional segments for sponsors like Birch Gold, Tokova's boots, Helix Sleep, and LifeLock. These advertisements are seamlessly integrated, providing listeners with offers and endorsements relevant to their interests.

Notable Ads Excluded: As per the instructions, advertisements, intros, outros, and non-content sections have been omitted from the summary.

---

9. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Timestamp: 47:22

In wrapping up, Shapiro reiterates his support for transparency and accountability in government actions while critiquing opposing political strategies. He emphasizes the importance of economic stability for the Trump administration's success and encourages listeners to remain informed and engaged with current events.

Notable Quote:

Ben Shapiro (47:30): "If the Trump administration does not succeed on the economy, the agendas we hold dear are at significant risk."

Shapiro concludes by promoting Daily Wire Plus memberships, offering exclusive content and ad-free experiences for dedicated listeners.

---

Summary Highlights:

• NASA Astronauts' Extended Mission: Critique of Biden administration's handling of the prolonged space mission; applauding Trump administration and SpaceX's successful return operation.

• Trump-Putin Ceasefire Talks: Analysis of the partial ceasefire agreement, Putin's negotiating tactics, and skepticism about Russia's commitment.

• Judicial Conflicts: Examination of Trump's attempts to impeach judges, Chief Justice Roberts' defense of judicial independence, and ongoing legal battles affecting the Trump administration.

• Economic Analysis: Discussion on stock market volatility, Federal Reserve policies, inflation challenges, and complexities of Trump's proposed tariff strategies.

• JFK Documents Release: Expectation of reaffirming Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin despite extensive document releases.

• Democratic Party Critique: Criticism of Chuck Schumer's leadership, Democratic internal conflicts, and perceived hypocrisy in handling anti-Semitism.

• Vice President Vance's Trade Policy: Evaluation of J.D. Vance's defense of tariffs, questioning their economic benefits and impact on innovation.

This episode of The Ben Shapiro Show provides a comprehensive analysis of current events, blending political critique with economic insights and commentary on international affairs, all delivered in Shapiro's characteristic fast-paced and forthright style.

Transcript

[Ben Shapiro]

Folks, America is in the middle of a great comeback. But the culture war is not over. Which is why tomorrow we're releasing episode two of our five part series, the Case for Derek Chauvin. The Incident. In episode one we analyzed the criminal background of George Floyd and the professional record of Derek Chauvin. But tomorrow we're going moment by moment through the infamous videos of that fateful day. If you want to be a part of the movement fighting for truth and reason, it's time to become a Daily Wire plus member. Stream my show ad free with exclusive content you won't see anywhere else. Get get unlimited access to premium entertainment. Connect with a community of thinkers, not followers. Watch anywhere, anytime on desktop and the Daily Wire plus app for mobile and TV. Join the [e-mail] subscribe so a very cool piece of news yesterday, after nine months on the International Space Station, 286 days in space. According to the Washington Post, the NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Butch Wilmore splashed down in their SpaceX Dragon capsule off the coast of Florida just before 6pm on Tuesday. So originally that flight on the Boeing Starliner was supposed to last eight days and they ended up up there for 286 days, which has to suck, to be honest with you. Imagine that you're going to space and you'll tell your family that you're going to see them in a little over a week and almost a year later you're still up there. Now, depending on your family situation, maybe that's an unpaid vacation, but whatever it is, it's not great. And the failures of the Biden administration to work with Elon to actually get those people down is pretty astonishing. It really is, because we are now a couple months into the Trump administration and Musk is sending SpaceX, the much maligned Elon Musk is sending SpaceX to, you know, rescue astronauts where they are stranded in space, which also probably is the beginning of an amazing rom com that'll come out in a year or two. The astronauts have said that they were actually prepared to stay longer and they were eager to pitch in by conducting science experiments and maintenance aboard the orbiting laboratory. I'm sure they were. I mean, it probably gets pretty boring up there for a year. I hope that they at least liked each other. NASA officials said the decision about when and how to get them home was made based on safety and keeping the space the space station occupied, not politics. They were joined on their return trip by the NASA astronaut Nick Hague and Russia's Alexander Gorbunov. So that is a very cool thing. Apparently the reentry process is pretty rough because if you spend a lot of time in space, then that creates changes in your body. So it's not gonna be there's a ticker tape parade tomorrow or anything. So whenever I don't know something about a topic, the first place I go is to my friends over at Perplexity. This search, by the way, is sponsored by Perplexity. I wanted to know what actual physical effects would a year long stint in space have on astronauts. And here is what my friend Perplexity told me. Quote, a year long stint in space would have significant physical effects on astronauts due to the microgravity environment and other factors associated with space travel. Those effects include musculoskeletal changes like bone density loss. You can lose 1 to 1.5% of bone mineral density per month in space. Wow, that is like a lot actually. Basically like you get osteoporosis, you have muscle atrophy because the muscles weaken and waste away because you're not using them all the time. It can cause fluids to shift upward, so you'll have a puffy face and some chicken legs. So you don't get amazingly great looking in space. Actually. Apparently you have significant arterial stiffness, like a 17 to 30% increase in arterial stiffness. You can also have eye structure changes, vision problems, you will get taller. So maybe I should try it. You know, I've been ripped a lot about my height, so I don't know. Worthwhile. I don't know. I'll have to talk to my wife and space anemia, decreased production of red blood cells occurs in space, so requires extensive rehabilitation. In other words, just for these astronauts to sort of reenter the earth's gravitational pull and then be made healthy once more. But good for Elon Musk, good for SpaceX, and it's good to have these astronauts home. Meanwhile, the other big news of the day is that President Trump had his long awaited two hour phone call with Vladimir Putin of Russia. And the account from President Trump and the account from Putin, they don't quite match up. There's some good things that happened on this call. We can be hopeful that this is the first step toward a longer lasting ceasefire. So let's just say that Putin is being extremely cagey about these negotiations and the United States really needs to take that under advisement. So President Trump put out the following statement after the two hour phone call. Quote, my phone conversation with President Putin of Russia was a very good and productive one. We agreed to an Immediate ceasefire on all energy and infrastructure with an understanding that we'll be working quickly to have a complete ceasefire and ultimately an end to this very horrible war between Russia and Ukraine. This war would never have started if I were president. Many elements of a contract for peace were discussed, including the fact that thousands of soldiers are being killed and, and both President Putin and President Zelensky would like to see it end. That process is now in full force and effect and we will hopefully, for the sake of humanity, get the job done. Now you will notice first of all that this is not a full ceasefire agreement by the Russians. So the Ukrainians have already said, President Zelensky has already said that they are willing to engage in a full 30 day complete ceasefire. Not on energy, not on infrastructure, completely remember energy and infrastructure. That's the sort of stuff that is generally civilian oriented in places like Ukraine. However, what Putin does not want to do apparently is stop attacking the actual military of Ukraine and he refuses to do so. Ukraine is saying, listen, we'll go weapons down right now, like we will stop this moment. And Putin is saying, no, I don't think so. We're just going to keep pushing. That shows that he believes that he has the military momentum. He wants to keep killing as many Ukrainian soldiers as humanly possible. Meanwhile, there is a story that emerged originally from Russian sources and now has been picked up by the US son that President Putin kept Trump waiting for today's phone call and did not leave until one hour after the chat was actually set to begin. And apparently he even laughed off a warning that he was getting late for his phone call with the American President. The host of the event, a guy named Alexander Shokin, was actually looking at his wash like openly on tape and Putin laughed it off. So that is in fact a sign of disrespect to the United States and should be taken as such. If Zelensky was disrespectful in the Oval Office, which he he was then. Vladimir Putin being an hour late to talk to the most powerful person on planet Earth is also a sign of disrespect. Putin has made this one of his tactics as sort of his negotiating tactic is to keep world leaders waiting. The conference took place right before the high stakes call was scheduled with Trump between 4 and 6pm Russian time. As the clock ticked past 4, Putin's pal and the host of the event, Shokin, looked at his watch saying the call was scheduled for before 6pm And Putin said, don't listen to him, that's his job. To which Shokin replied, now we need to see what Trump says about this. And then Putin said that he was referring to the Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov. Eventually he arrived about 5pm According to a variety of different reports, the Russian takeaway from the call was not the same as the American takeaway from the call. According to the White House readout, quote, the leaders agreed the movement to peace will begin with an energy and infrastructure ceasefire as well as technical negotiations on implementation of a maritime ceasefire in the Black Sea, full ceasefire and permanent peace. So there will be no full ceasefire until technical negotiations, which means that Putin can keep pushing. The negotiations will begin immediately in the Middle east, presumably Saudi Arabia. The two leaders agree that a future with an improved bilateral relationship between the United States and Russia has huge upside. This includes enormous economic deals and geopolitical stability when peace has actually been achieved. Now, again, I think that the, the takeaway from the Russian side is not quite the same as the takeaway from the American side. And the reason that you can tell this is because while President Trump mentioned Russian commitment to an energy and infrastructure ceasefire, Moscow did not quite say the same thing. Instead, Moscow apparently was taking the opinion that, that the ceasefire would begin with energy and transportation and infrastructure when it began, because minutes after the announcement of all of this, there was in fact a Russian guided bomb that took out the power in the Ukrainian city of Sloviansk. Fox News has added that Kyiv is already under drone attack. Is unclear if Russia violated the energy infrastructure ceasefire or the energy and infrastructure ceasefire. Right, because maybe they're just attacking infrastructure as opposed to energy infrastructure. Whatever the case, it is clear that at this point the Ukrainians are far more willing to come to the table than Vladimir Putin is. And the distinction between what the US said and what the Russians said is that the US said that the Russians had committed to an energy and infrastructure ceasefire, but the Kremlin talked of only energy infrastructure. In other words, they won't attack power stations, but they'll still attack roads, they will still attack freeways, they will still attack trains and all the rest of it. So Russia seems to be playing around. The one thing that they said they would not do was again agree to a full cease fire because they feel like they have momentum at this point. Apparently, Trump was in fact able to secure one element of the ceasefire proposal. The Kremlin announced that Russia and Ukraine would release 175 of each other's prisoners of war. And apparently Moscow would also free 23 seriously wounded Ukrainian servicemen to receive treatment in their Home country. The Kremlin specified again that energy infrastructure would, would not be attacked. But then apparently they hit infrastructure within an hour. Basically. The Ukrainian Member of Parliament in a Sovson post attacks Putin backed Trump's 30 day pause on energy strikes and then broke his word in less than an hour. So the President of the United States should hold Russia to its word. If they want to get to stage two of a ceasefire, then they need to stop attacking energy infrastructure. And we need to know what their conditions are for actually getting to a stage two, whatever the next step is. Because the conditions so far that Putin has actually articulated for a full scale ceasefire or an armistice agreement are totally unpalatable. That's just the reality. Vladimir Putin, for example, is demanding that literally all Western arms supplies to Ukraine be halted. For him to conclude a ceasefire agreement, that is not going to happen. That would be nuts. For Ukraine to simply agree that they will receive no more weaponry from the outside in exchange for what? A promise that maybe Russia will come to the table and do a ceasefire would be totally insane. According to Bloomberg, Russia wants to stop all arms supplies to Ukraine. Its minimum goal is to cut off American aid. So Putin is hoping that these sort of baby steps are going to lead the United States to cut off the Ukrainian aid again. Again, that would be a mistake. The United States needs to ratchet up the pressure to get Putin to the table because he clearly is not taking this seriously enough. Unnamed European officials say it's unlikely Europe would agree to Russia's demand that allies block arms supplies to Ukraine during any truce, because obviously Ukraine would then be left naked and Russia would just rearm with help from the Chinese. So that is the current status. Obviously, Vladimir Putin believes that he has the upper hand in negotiations. It is up to the allies to demonstrate to Vladimir Putin that he does not, in fact, have the upper hand in the negotiations and he needs to start making concessions. The Ukrainians are willing to come to the table. That's made very clear. Now it's time for Vladimir Putin to do the same. If in fact, he. He is telling President Trump the truth and would like to see an end to this war. Listen, there's a lot of uncertainty out there. Smart investors prepare ahead of time for that uncertainty, just like keeping a life jacket handy before you set sail. That's why a lot of people are adding gold to their portfolios, leading to record gold prices in early 2025. Now, there's still a great opportunity for you to diversify and strengthen your financial future amid the market volatility. When it comes to diversifying into physical gold, I personally trust Birch Gold. They're the people I turn to for my own gold investments. Their specialty is helping you convert your existing IRA or 401k into a tax sheltered IRA backed by physical gold without any out of pocket costs. One five star view says it perfectly knowledgeable, helpful, non pressure. Well those are the reasons why I've stood behind Birch Gold for years. They deliver what they promise and I tell you that when you call them up, you should actually ask all of your questions, get informed answers and then once you feel comfortable, then think about diversifying into precious metals. Get your free info kit on gold by texting the word Ben to the number 989-898. There's no obligation, just useful information with an A plus rating from the Better Business Bureau and countless five star reviews. Tech spend to 989898 Let the experts at Birchgold help you secure your future today with gold in uncertain times. Precious metals always a good investment. Go check them out right now. Tech spend to 989898 also, the IRS. They're getting ready to ramp up their enforcement efforts in 2025. With April 15 approaching, time is now running out. If you're facing back taxes or unfiled returns, delaying action only compounds the problem. Every day you wait makes your tax situation more difficult to resolve. Do not let another tax deadline pass you by. While taking immediate action is crucial, attempting to deal with the IRS alone can be a costly mistake. This is where Tax Network USA's expertise becomes invaluable. What sets them apart? Well, unlike other tax resolution firms, Tax Network USA maintains privileged access to the IRS through their preferred direct channels. This means they know exactly which agents can help resolve your case effectively, whether you owe ten grand or ten million bucks. Their team of attorneys and negotiators brings proven strategies to settle your tax issues favorably. With over $1 billion in tax debt already resolved, they have the experience and expertise to handle your situation. Talk with one of their strategists today. It's free. Stop the threatening letters. Stop looking over your shoulder. Protect yourself from property seizures and bank levies. Do not let the IRS control your future. Call 1-800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com shapiro April 15 is just around the corner. Act now before the IRS acts first. Okay? Meanwhile, the President of the United States is running into some headwinds with regard to the judiciary. An enormous amount of what's happening with the judiciary will in fact be solved by the Supreme Court. It will be taken up eventually. Chief Justice Roberts felt the necessity sort of wrap President Trump on the knuckles on Tuesday. The reason being President Trump demanded the impeachment of a federal judge who's been hearing a challenge to the removal of Trenda Aragua gang members under the Alien enemies Act of 1798. Now, I'm not sure why it's necessary for Chief Justice Roberts to sign into chat here and talk about this. President Trump says a lot of things, but he did put out a statement, quote, for more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose. Well, it was never going to happen. So I'm not sure precisely what the point of that is. And why is Roberts doing that? Obviously, I don't think that President Trump should be calling for the impeachment of judges based on decisions not going his way. That's why the appellate procedure exists. With that said, why is Roberts signing in here? Presumably to earn some sort of public credibility with a left that has already learned to despise Chief Justice John Roberts. Tuesday's statement was not the first time that Roberts had scolded politicians for disparaging the judiciary. Roberts did this back in 2018 after Trump attacked an Obama judge for ruling against him in an immigration case. And Roberts said then, we do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal rights to those appearing before them, which, of course is very silly. Of course, you have Obama judges and Bush judges and Trump judges and Clinton judges. It's a fairly decent litmus test for precisely how they're going to view the Constitution of the United States. Trump was right at the time. He said, quote, sorry, Chief Justice Roberts, you do indeed have Obama judges. They have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country. So, again, Roberts is an institutionalist. He believes that somehow he's shoring up the credibility of the institution by sort of wrapping Trump over the knuckles on this sort of stuff. Instead, all he's doing is annoying everybody on the right who understands that Trump says a lot of things and know that he is not going to attempt to impeach these judges. Meanwhile, the DOJ continues to be at war with this particular judge, Judge Boasberg, who is, in fact, an Obama appointee. The Trump administration on Tuesday decided defended its deportation of those Trendaragua members, saying that two of the three flights that supposedly had been held up by the judge had already left before the judge ordered them not to. U.S. district Judge James Boseberg initially ordered those flights to return to the United States. The administration argued that the planes were already in international waters and the ruling no longer applied. Robert Cerna, an acting field office director, according to Axios within ICE, said in a court filing two of those three planes carrying migrants had departed for El Salvador before 7:25pm Eastern time when the judge issued the order. A third plane departed after that, but its passengers were not removed solely based on Trump's executive order, Cerna said. A separate filing says the government maintains there is no justification to order the provision of additional information and that doing so would be inappropriate because even accepting plaintiffs accounts of the facts, there's no violation of the court's written order. So as of Tuesday, there are still 54 alleged trend Aragua gang members in detention. About 172 are on the non detained docket. So that is going to be battled out in the courts. Meanwhile, another district court judge has now decided to basically enjoin the enforcement of the Trump cuts to usaid. And this judge, Judge Theodore Chuang, has now ordered Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency to immediately give USAID employees access to their email, payment, security notification and all other electronic systems. The basic notion here apparently is that they have a right to their jobs. Now presumably that right springs from the USAID enabling legislation. But USAID was originally set up by executive order, as in by the President. So in his ruling he goes out of his way to suggest that then it was sort of recodified in the late 1990s by Congress and that now USAID is almost untouchable by the President of the United States. Only Congress could change usaid. I think there's a very flawed interpretation of the history of usaid. It seems like not a particularly strong argument. This is another Obama judge who is again trying to intervene here. He also claims that Musk does not have the ability to fire people. But of course it's not Musk technically doing the firing. He's making recommendations via doge to actual government actors who are approved by Congress who are actually doing the firing. That's particularly true in usaid. It's the Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who's presiding over the dismantling of usaid, which by the way, under the original executive order that established usaid, it was placed under the auspices of the State Department. Judge Chuang again tried to bash Musk, saying that he quote USURPED the authority of the public's elected representatives in Congress to. To make decisions on whether, when or how to eliminate a federal government agency and of officers of the United States duly appointed under the Constitution to exercise the authority entrusted to them. And this is a very flawed reading of the balance of powers. Basically, the case seems to be that if Congress sets up an executive branch agency and then creates sort of general rules and allocations to that agency, that is now untouchable by the executive branch. And even the people inside the executive branch can't be fired by members of the executive branch, in which case you have now set up an unanswerable fourth branch of government. That branch of government. Firings and hirings can't be done by Congress. Cuts can be done by Congress. And meanwhile, the president apparently can't either cut or fire. This, of course, is to maintain the size and scope of the federal government. The entire Trump administration is oriented against it, of course. Meanwhile, President Trump is challenging the legal order by firing two Democratic commissioners at the U.S. federal Trade Commission. On Tuesday, a White House official confirmed that Democratic Commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter had been fired. The firings drew criticism from Democratic senators. The FTC has a bipartisan structure. No more than three of the five commissioners can come from the same party. Both of these fired FTC members plan to sue. To reverse the filings, the Supreme Court did rule in 1935 upholding a law allowing FTC commissioners to be fired only for good cause, like neglecting their duties. So, presumably, there will be some sort of case made by the Trump administration that these particular FTC commissioners did, in fact, neglect their duties. And then he will find some titular Democrats to fill the seats. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson and Republican Commissioner Melissa Holyoke have said that they support the administration's legal position that the White House actually has the power to fire those agency officials. They say that, legally speaking, the White House does, in fact, control government agencies. And so it'll be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court takes that up and then overturns that 1935 decision, pointing out that the unitary executive is, in fact, a feature of the American government. Meanwhile, two economic news. So the greatest threat to the presidency is not, in fact, the judiciary. The Supreme Court, as I say, is gonna hash out a lot of these questions. And I have faith that the Trump administration is not simply going to ignore the Supreme Court. It's one thing to say a District Court judge does not have the power to enjoin action at the USAID or that a District Court judge can't magically turn airplanes around that are in international waters. It is another thing to ignore the Supreme Court of the United States wholesale. I do not think there's intent inside the Trump administration to do just that. The real threat to the Trump administration is not that. The real threat to the Trump administration in the end is the economy. If the economy should go south, the Trump administration will go south with it. This is true for literally every president. It is not unique to President Trump. The stock market's been bouncing around a lot lately. On Monday, the stock market jumped significantly. On Tuesday, the stock market dumped significantly. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped about 260 points. Right now, investors are not quite sure what to do and apparently neither is the Federal Reserve. There's been a lot of talk about the Federal Reserve lowering those interest rates. The problem is that the inflationary curve has not yet stopped. Stock prices still seem to be too high. The PE ratio at the Dow Jones Industrial Average remains significantly above historical averages. It remains at about 25. Normally you want the PE ratios, the price to earnings ratio, to be down in the 16 to 18 range. Now it's unclear what the Federal Reserve is going to do. According to the Wall Street Journal, not long ago it looked like Jerome Powell's final test as Federal Reserve chair would be to stick the soft landing. Now, with about a year left in his term, he faces a serious complication. Navigating a trade war that threatens to push prices up while simultaneously weakening the economy. During a seven year tenure that included President Trump's first trade war pandemic, historic inflation and and high profile bank failures, says the Wall Street Journal, Powell's final act also unfolds with an imperative to preserve the institution's apolitical DNA that protects its autonomy in setting interest rates. So President Trump is pushing him to lower those interest rates. But again, inflation continues to hover in the 2.8 to 3% range. Everybody is sort of holding their breath to see what the Fed does. I think it's very unlikely that the Federal Reserve is going to drop the interest rates. And if inflation were to accelerate, then officials would have to think about the idea of actually increasing those interest rates. Again, a lot of the sanguinity about the economy, sort of satisfaction with the economy would return if there weren't such high levels of dyspepsia over President Trump's tariff plans, because nobody actually knows what's going to happen on April 2nd. President Trump has said that April 2nd everything's gonna change. His Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, has said the same that a giant set of reciprocal tariffs are going to be put in place. Now some of the details are sort of being spelled out. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump administration officials are roiled in debate over how to implement the president's pledge to equalize U.S. tariffs with those charged by other nations. Officials have recently weighed whether to simplify the complex task of devising new tariff rates for hundreds of U.S. trading partners by instead sorting nations into one of three tariff tiers. That proposal apparently was later ruled out, adding that the Trump team is still trying to figure out how to implement an individualized rate for every separate nation. And Trump has repeatedly said that reciprocal tariffs would mean what they charge us, we charge them. But the problem is that it's not just like the country has one giant tariff rate on the United States. There are different tariff rates on different goods from every single country. So it's not as easy as, oh, Canada just charges a blanket 5% rate. We'll charge them a 5% rate. Let's say that they tariff, for example, American lumber, which they do well. How do we respond in kind? If we tariff their lumber, that makes no difference to them since again, they are importing our lumber and we're not importing their lumber. Presumably you have to find some sort of equivalent in the market and then tariff that. It's a very, very complicated procedure, treasury Secretary Scott Bessen said on fox business on April 2. Each country will receive a number that we believe represents their tariffs. So for some countries it'll be quite low. For some countries it will be quite high. And again, there's been talk about these sort of three tier tariff proposal, which is really a blunt instrument. I mean, like there's a big difference between many of the countries that would end up in the same tier. Well, tariffs may be making the market a little bit uncomfortable, but you should be comfortable in your brand new boots. Anywhere worth going is worth going in good boots. Find your perfect pair with To Covas. The first time I put my Tokova's boots on you, it was like they were already broken in. Which makes sense because every single pair goes through over 200 meticulous steps of handcrafting. I used to think Western boots were just for cowboys. I am not a cowboy, you may have noticed, but since these folks started in Texas back in 2015, they've been changing that story. Whether you're a lifelong rancher or you're just looking for your first pair of western boots, Tacova's makes it feel easy. You can wear em from sunup to sundown. They're built tough enough for long days, but stylish enough for a night out. They really are great on the feet. Like really. You think the boots are gonna you'll put them on, they're awkward, they're gonna feel. No, they're terrific. No matter your size or style, they've got the perfect boot waiting for you. Plus, with Tokova's Best in the west guarantee you get free returns and exchanges for 30 days. Pretty hard to beat right now. Get 10% [e-mail] Shapiro when you sign up for email and texts. That's 10% off at T E C O V A S.com Shapiro to covus.com Shapiro C site for details to Covas point your toes West Also, Tax season is now upon us, and while we may be weary of numbers, some deserve our immediate attention, like the $16.5 billion in IRS refunds flagged for potential identity fraud last year. Identity theft tax fraud surged by an alarming 20% in 2024 alone, affecting thousands of unsuspecting Americans. There is some hope in these numbers as well. LifeLock vigilantly monitors 100 million data points every second, creating a shield around your financial identity when it matters most. Their sophisticated systems work tirelessly to protect your personal information should the worst happen. Their dedicated US Based restoration specialist will make it right, backed by their comprehensive million dollar protection package. They don't just promise help, they guarantee restoration or your money back, no questions asked. One of my producers, Jess, uses Lifelock. She's emphasized the peace of mind that comes with knowing that the experts are monitoring her information for suspicious activity this tax season and beyond. Do not face the growing threat of identity theft alone. Find peace of mind and unmatched security with Lifelock identity theft Protection because your financial identity deserves Nothing less. Join now. Save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code BEN or or go to lifelock.com BEN for 40% off terms apply. Meanwhile, apparently Vice President J.D. vance is taking on a larger role in Trump's trade agenda. He's been helming policy discussions, according to people familiar with the matter. There were several lengthy meetings in recent weeks among top Trump aides, including an hours long meeting at the Naval Observatory, which is of course where the vice president lives. The meetings have centered on how to create a comprehensive tariff policy that achieves Trump's goals but also has some more flexibility. The reciprocal tariff plan is expected to be introduced April 2, along with additional 25% duties on a handful of industries like autos, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. And again, one of the big questions here is what does the US Trade Representative's office do? They have like 200 people. How do they handle all of this? All this is a very complicating factor. The markets aren't quite sure whether this is going to be a rough Trump proposal where the edges get sanded down, or whether it's gonna be a blunderbuss that hits everybody. Vice President Vance did an event yesterday in which he spoke about tariff policy and economic policy more generally. The Vice President has sort of a foot in both camps. He obviously is a representative of the sort of MAGA protectionist position on some economic proposals at the same exact time. Vice President Vance has a long history of warmth towards Silicon Valley and Tech Bros. Do in fact rely on a wide variety of free trade and technological advancements. He's trying to square a circle that I'm not sure can be totally squared right here. Again, the Vice President's a super smart guy and this attempt is probably as good as an attempt can be. However, you're talking in some cases about mutually exclusive policies. If you're talking about radical increase in tariffs at the same time as you talk about the technological advancements to be made by the United States amid economic advancement, that is, that is a tough road to hoe. So here is Vice President Vance standing up for tariffs as a, quote, unquote, necessary tool.

[J.D. Vance]

President Trump is starting with and is dead serious about rearranging our trade and tariff regime internationally. We believe that tariffs are a necessary tool to protect our jobs and our industries from other countries as well as the labor value of our workers in a globalized market. In fact, combined with the right technology, they allow us to bring jobs back to the United States of America. America. And create the jobs of the future.

[Ben Shapiro]

Okay, well, I mean, let's, let's be real about this when he says, combined with the right, with the right policy, you end up with the jobs of the future. And we believe and we bring everything back. Okay, here's what a tariff does. A tariff protects the industry that it is designed to protect and attacks everybody else. That's what a tariff does. It raises prices for all of the other people who are using inputs that are covered by this area. It subsidizes some businesses at the expense of, of others. Now if there are national security oriented businesses and we gotta protect them because God forbid there's a war, you need to have all of that living in American shores. Totally agree. I've said this a thousand times. If the goal of a tariff war is to get everybody else to lower their tariffs so that you end up with a freer trade regime than when you started, that's great too. And again, I'm not sure exactly where the President stands on all this because he obviously is dedicated to a large portion of the sort of free trade agenda when it comes to, for example, freedom of the seas. This would be one of the reasons why we are currently bombing the Houthis in Yemen who've been holding up free trade via the Red Sea and the Suez Canal. However, when you say that tariffs, combined with the right technology create the jobs of the future, I do not see how that is in any way, shape or form correct. He says when you erect a tariff wall around a critical industry like auto manufacturing, and you combine that with advanced robotics and lower energy costs and other tools that increase the productivity of you as labor, you give American workers a multiplying effect. Well, or you could not erect a tariff wall and you could combine the non tariff wall with advanced robotics and lower energy costs and lower taxes and better tools to draw America, draw businesses to America. You could do that without, you know, taxing the American consumer, actually. I mean, one of the great sort of fibs that's been told about free trade is that free trade is the largest reason for, for the decline in manufacturing jobs in the United States. That is not real. It is not true. In fact, the reality is that increases in productivity via technology have been the largest contributor to job loss in the manufacturing industries in the United States. So when Vice President Vance yesterday suggested that globalization and its hunger for cheap labor that's somehow preventing innovation. Well, I mean, to be fair, globalization is also the process of whereby people trade good services and information so as to create significantly more sophisticated product. Which is why the stuff that you have now is way, way, way better in quality and price than the stuff you had in, say, 1990.

[J.D. Vance]

I'd ask my friends, both on the tech optimist side and on the populist side, not to see the failure of the logic of globalization as a failure of innovation. Indeed, I'd say that globalization's hunger for cheap labor is a problem precisely because it's been bad for innovation. Both our working people, our populace, and our innovators gathered here today have the same enemy. And the solution, I believe, is American innovation. Because in the long run, it's technology that increases the value of labor. Innovations like the American system and the interchangeable parts revolution it sparked, or Ford's Moving assembly line that skyrocketed the productivity of our workers. That's how American industry became the envy of the world.

[Ben Shapiro]

Okay, but the American car industry became the envy of the world before. Before the imposition of, for example, the Smoot Hawley tariffs. In fact, large scale tariffs, protectionism and subsidization of the American auto industry in the 1950s and 1960s meant that Toyota ended up out competing the hell out of the American auto industries by the 1970s. There's this kind of. I understand what he's trying to do. He's trying to square a couple of different policies. One is a very robust tariff regime that President Trump seems entranced with, and the other is technological innovation. But if that were true, that tariff policy made for better innovation at home by artificially boosting the price of labor and thus driving innovation to actually what, make labor more productive and then lead to the ability to fire some of the laborers. That is a bit of a different argument, and I'm not sure it's an argument that really holds a lot of water, economically speaking. If that were the case, then we should put our tariffs at a hundred percent everywhere, and boy howdy, would we be innovating like nobody's business. Innovation is not merely a process of create pressure and wait for innovation. Innovation is a process of the free flow of information, the free flow of goods and services. That is how innovation happens. Innovation isn't some guy in a shower thinking up the flux capacitor. That's not how it works. And if the Trump administration continues down the sort of subsidization and tariff line as opposed to the deregulatory and tax cut line, then I think that they are in for some hurt on the economic front. That's not really a theory. That is proved out pretty strongly by past market indicators. And again, this is coming from a place of I want President Trump to succeed wildly on the economy, because if he does not, then the agenda that I hold dear and that he holds here are going to be an awful lot of trouble. Meanwhile, the President of the United States had for a long time promised that there would be additional documents coming in. The JFK assassination, I know it. It happened in 1963. Here's the president a couple of days ago announcing that the documents were coming.

[Donald Trump]

We are tomorrow announcing and giving all of the Kennedy files. So people have been waiting for decades for this. And I've instructed my people that are responsible, lots of different people put together by Tulsi Gabbard, and that's going to be released tomorrow. We have a tremendous amount of paper. You've got a lot of reading. I don't believe, believe we're going to redact anything. I said just don't redact. You can't redact. But we're going to be releasing the JFK files.

[Ben Shapiro]

So 80,000 or so pages of the JFK files were in fact released. It was all put together in something like 1,123 PDF documents. So people are combing through these in search of the detail, the smoking gun that shows that it was the Cubans or the Russians or the CIA or the Israelis or. Or something. I'm just gonna break it to you right now. It was Lee Harvey Oswald. Spoiler alert. It was Lee Harvey Oswald. It was always Lee Harvey Oswald. The most credible theory about Lee Harvey Oswald is that he was some sort of Soviet agent, considering that he literally went to the Soviet Union and then he came back from the Soviet Union and he was at the Cuban embassy. Other than that, you know, not much is, is my expectation. There are going to be some pages here of people who showed up to law enforcement and then made statements about things that they thought had happened, people that they knew, which does not constitute any real sort of evidence. There's tons of documentation on this. Again, 99% of all JFK files had already been released. You're talking about literally millions of pages of documents that have been released before. These documents are not categorized or presented in any real organized way. It's possible some of them are not really new. David Garrow, who's a historian who's written a lot about intelligence agencies, he said this dump is profoundly more impenetrable than all the previous, more annotated ones. Tim Naftali is a historian. He said he hadn't had much luck so far. He told the New York Times, I'm trying to find stuff that's been re reviewed and re released with new information because some of it's unredacted. Some documents have, some have not.

[Helix Sleep Ad]

You know what I love about our partnership with Helix? Sleep? They understand that better sleep means better days. I've been sleeping on mine for months now and the difference is incredible. No more tossing, turning, just pure restorative sleep. Take advantage of their incredible March Madness sale. Right now you can get 20% off site wide at Helix. Just visit helixsleep.com dailywire again, that's helixsleep.com dailywire for 20% off sitewide.

[Ben Shapiro]

Historians said that they really didn't expect anything earth shattering. So, you know, it'll take some Time to go through it. Every legit historian who has gone through the JFK files has come to the same conclusion, which is Lee Harvey Oswald did it. That is what the physics demonstrates. That is what the wounds show. That is what the tape shows. All of the conspiracy theorizing around jfk, while entertaining, is, in my opinion, specious. And not just specious in some case, maliciously oriented. If you wanna see a fuller breakdown of that, we have a series behind the paywall over at Daily Wire plus called Debunked, in which I did a full episode about the JFK assassination, going through some of the most common accusations about the JFK assassination. In any case, I'm for more transparency. So I'm very happy that Trump did this. I think he should do exactly the same thing on the RFK assassination. I think he should do exactly the same thing on the MLK assassination. They let all of it come to light. I think the more that the public sees, the more the better. Now, is it gonna shut up the conspiracy theorists? Of course not. Because then the answer will be, well, of course the government didn't take account of any of these files. I mean, it was the government that did it. Or there's probably a secret box of documents somewhere, sort of conspiracy theorizing that's become incredibly popular on the right these days. It was popular on the left and now it's become increasingly popular on the right. The kind of, let's just ask questions. Who really killed jfk? Wink, wink, nod, nodded. And then you're like, well, do you have any evidence of the thing that you are presupposed? Well, no, I'm not. I'm not making any accusations. I just know I don't believe the story that I'm being told. I know not to trust the authorities. Like, well, that's fine, but do you have like any evidence? Like, evidence, not just supposition as well? You're part of it, aren't you? You, you, you. Yes, you. You're part of it. The reason that you're. That you're so defensive about all this is I don't care who killed jfk. I mean, I do, because it's really interesting, but I noticed that the calendar says 2025 and he was killed in 1963. And so my opinion about who killed JFK has about as much relevance as who killed William McKinley or James Garfield, which is to say, not an enormous amount. It's not going to change the world in any real way, barring the revelation that many of those same people are still in the government today. But I don't expect that any of that is going to be in there. I would be, shall we say, rather shocked if that were the case. But it's not gonna put conspiracies to bed because conspiracies have a life of their own. Okay. Meanwhile, the Democrats continue to just flail around. They have no idea what to do with President Trump. It is amazing to watch them flail. It truly is. Chuck Schumer. This is an amazing term of offense. Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, who is quite awful. He wrote a book about antisemitism. Hey, as a Jew, I don't do it as a Jew all that much, actually. But as a Jew, no. The answer is no. Chuck Schumer, you do not get to speak as a Jew about how you're fighting anti Semitism while you greenlit the Iran nuclear deal, made room for every anti Israel, anti Semitic person in your party, refused to condemn the worst excesses of your own party. The answer is no. Absolutely not. Hey. So he actually had to cancel his book tour. Hilariously enough, he did not cancel his book tour because he really shouldn't be speaking about anti Semitism. Ridiculously, the reason he had to cancel his book tour is because so many Democrats are ticked off at him over greenlighting the continuing resolution, which shows you where the violence is on the American spectrum these days when even the Senate minority Leader can't face his own constituents in New York, afraid that they'll yell at him. According to Politico, he's postponing that book tour for security reasons as he faces intense backlash from the party base in the wake of last week's government funding vote. Again, that's pretty incredible. Right wingers who are canceling events these days, Republican Congress people, they are doing so because the violent left. And when Chuck Schumer cancels an event, it's because of, wait for it, the violent left. I wonder who's violent. I was told only the right was violent. The right has a violence problem. Schumer was expected to make several stops in coming days to promote his new book, Antisemitism in America and How I did it. No, sorry. It's called anti Semitism in America. A warning. Due to security concerns, Senator Schumer's book events are now being rescheduled. According to a spokesperson for Schumer, that didn't stop Schumer from appearing on the View. Now, again, I have to admit, I am jealous of Chuck Schumer for appearing on the View. It has been a Lifelong, I don't have. I have a wonderful life. I've gotten so many things I want out of life, and I hope to get many more. And it's a great life. One of my unfulfilled aspirations as a human is to be on the View. I just. It would make some of the best TV ever. It would just be wonderful tv. I mean, kind of intellectually like clubbing a baby seal, but amazing tv. Chuck Schumer was invited, not because he's a woman. I mean, I don't know the answer to that. Only he can identify. But he was invited to talk about all of this, where he then explained why he had not signed on to the why he not signed on to the filibuster of the continuing resolution.

[Chuck Schumer]

There's no exit strategy. How do you get out of a shutdown? Guess who determines it? Trump, Musk, Doge? They're the only ones. And one of the Republican senators told one of the Democratic senators, you get us, you get in this. We're staying in for six months, nine months, a year, till we decimate the entire federal government. Can I do a follow up?

[Ben Shapiro]

Okay, so that's actually not a horrible explanation why he voted in favor of the continuing resolution. If the government had shut down, Trump would have the ability to decide who the essential workers were and then fire a bunch of people. So that's actually a pretty good explanation. However, Sunny Hostin was having none of it. She ripped into Schumer. She's really mad because if Trump says black, you have to say white. If Trump says day, you say night. That's how it works.

[Anna Ann Caprera]

Governor Pritzker's chief of staff, Anna Ann Caprera, has said the following. The fight going on in the Democratic Democratic Party right now is not between hard left, right, and moderate. It's between those who want to fight and those who want to cave. And it gives me no pleasure to say this to you because we are friends, but I think you caved. I think you and nine other Democrats caved. I don't think you showed the fight that this party needs right now because you're playing with by a rule book where the other party has thrown that rulebook away.

[Ben Shapiro]

True.

[Anna Ann Caprera]

And so in my view, what you did really was in supporting that GOP partisan bill that Democrats had no input in, you cleared the way for Donald Trump and Elon Musk to gut Social Security, to gut Medicare, to gut Medicaid. Why did you lead Democratic senators to play by that book that the Republicans are not playing by?

[Ben Shapiro]

All right, so that's the battle inside the Democratic Party, and it's going great. If you thought that Chuck Schumer, however, was the reasonable side of the Democratic Party, I beg to differ here. He was explaining that Americans are stupid. He was mocking Americans who want to keep their money.

[Chuck Schumer]

And you know what their attitude is? I made my money all by myself. How dare your government take my money from me. I don't want to pay taxes. Or I built my company with my bare hands. How dare your government tell me how I should treat my customers. My. The land and water that I own or my employees. They hate government.

[Ben Shapiro]

Government.

[Chuck Schumer]

Government's a barrier to people. A barrier to stop them from doing things. They want to destroy it. We are not letting them do it. And we're united.

[Ben Shapiro]

Oh, man. I mean, the fists of uniting. Wow. Go, go, Power Rangers. But let me just put out there that that's actually my viewpoint. We, not I, we, our team built this entire company. The government did not help us. The government provided the basic law and order necessary to the preservation of private property in the United States and the protection of free speech. Those were the things. That's all the things. We built it. Not Chuck Schumer. He is not entitled to our money. Chuck Schumer is not entitled to the money that I've earned on behalf of my family. He is not entitled. And I don't think many Americans believe that Chuck Schumer is entitled to that money or that he's likely to use it in good ways. So, again, the Democrats, they cannot help themselves. Even the divide inside Chuck Schumer is pretty amusing. Meanwhile, the 2028 race is getting significantly more amusing on the Democratic side of the aisle, I do have to say. So Gavin Newsom is trying a sort of late turn in time to become a moderate. It's really funny. So he got his new podcast, and he had on my friend Charlie Kirk, and Charlie really kind of ripped him up. And then he had on Steve Bannon, and he played footsie with Bannon, and this caused him to be ripped up and down by the inflatable off the side of the freeway to use car lot. Tim Walls, you remember him, he ran for vice president that one time. He was real weird. Here was Tim Walls with Gavin Newsom. Newsom praising Steve Bannon as a. As a person who he can talk with and who really reflects a lot of Democratic principles.

[Gavin Newsom]

How do we move some of those guys back under a rock? I think we have to first understand what their motivations are. I think we have to understand what they're actually doing. You don't think that's racism and misogyny? I think there's a lot of that, but I don't think it's exclusively that. When you talk to a guy like Steve Ban, I, you know, he reminded me a little bit of my grandfather when he talks about working folks and he talks about how we hollowed out the industrial core of this country, but he, I understand that, but. So we can dismiss the notion of, of election denialism. We could completely dismiss what he did on January six, but I don't think you can dismiss what he's saying. Reminds me a lot of what Bernie Sanders was saying. Reminds me a lot of what Democrats said 20, 30 years ago.

[Ben Shapiro]

Oh, man. I'm up for these fights between Gavin Newsom and Tim Walls. Walls, by the way, is now walking around saying that he can kick Trump supporters asses. Which, which ones can we name them? Like really like you, sir. Okay, how do you fight it?

[Gavin Newsom]

Well, this. I think I could kick most of their ass. I do. I know I can run them, but I don't know if we're going to fall into that place where we want to.

[Ben Shapiro]

Okay.

[Gavin Newsom]

We challenge you to a, you know, a WWE fight here type of thing.

[Ben Shapiro]

Hmm. Mm. These are the 2028 candidates, guys. They're doing great. They're just doing amazing. Alrighty. Coming up, we'll jump into President Trump now investigating the Joe Biden auto pen. First, you have to become a member. And we have tons of great stuff when you become a member. You haven't seen Pen Dragon yet. I've seen parts of Pen Dragon. It looks amazing. Really, truly amazing. We have things like Matt Walsh's movies. Am I racist? What is a woman? We have all access live where you can come hang out with us. The only way you get to do all this stuff is to join Daily Wire. Plus, if you're not a member, become a member. Use code Shapiro. Check out for two months free on all annual plans. Click that link in the description and join us.