Ben Shapiro (38:47)
Now, I think the markets would react a very different way than President Trump suggests if the Supreme Court were to strike down the tariffs. Yeah, there would be another round of uncertainty, but at least the President wouldn't be able to sort of just blanket tariff the entire world. So my guess is the economy would actually rebound in the face of such a decision by the Supreme Court. Alrighty, time for some fast facts. We begin with more on the Supreme Court. So the Supreme Court has now rejected a call to overturn Obergefell. Obergefell, of course, is the Supreme Court case that established essentially a national right to same sex marriage. That case is wrongly decided. It is an egregious violation of, of the constitutional text. But the Supreme Court did not want to take it up. That is not a surprise. Even in the Dobbs case, which overthrew Roe versus Wade, there was a footnote from Justice Kavanaugh in which he explicitly said, basically, we're not going to take up Obergefell. The reason those two cases were supposedly linked is because the right to abortion that theoretically existed under Roe vs. Wade was predicated on a broader right to privacy. And that same right to privacy, which was again based in a notion known as substantive due process, which again, is a nonsensical notion. That entire concept is also the basis for the idea that there is a right to same sex marriage implicit in the Constitution of the United States, which is totally insane. There is no such right implicit in the Constitution of The United States. Now, that does not mean that on a public policy level that there should be laws against gay people living together or people doing what they want in the privacy of their own homes. That is a pragmatic and moral consideration that each state should go through at its own behest. But the idea there's a federal right, a federal right for a man to marry a man is of course ridiculous and violates the Constitution. The Supreme Court, however, does not want to touch it. That is not a particular shock since same sex marriage has been embedded into the fabric of the society for 10 years and probably 20 if you go back to Massachusetts starting to perform these sorts of marriages. Her lawyers, the lawyers for Kim Davis are the ones who sued. She, of course, was the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples after that 2015 ruling in Obergeville. She'd been trying to get the court to overturn a lower court order for her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney's fees. So a couple denied a marriage license. Her lawyers repeatedly invoked the words of Justice Clarence Thomas, who has called for erasing the same sex marriage ruling on the basis of, you know, the thing called the Constitution. So again, there's probably some support on the court for overthrowing Obergefell, but certainly not enough. For example, Justice Amy Coney Barrett has said that same sex marriage might not be in the same sort of category with regard to right to privacy as abortion because people have relied on the decision when they married and then had kids. The bottom line here is that again, the, the chance of the Supreme Court was going to touch this were always extremely, extremely low. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is poised to hear a major challenge to mail in ballot laws. According to the New York Times, they will hear a challenge to Mississippi's counting of mail in ballots received after election day. So first of all, if you mail in your ballot and it is received after election day, tough luck. This is ridiculous. The, the, this notion, first of all, that we should be doing vast mail in balloting in the United States weeks in advance of an election is totally crazy. It used to be called election day. It is now election season. And if you waited until election day to mail your ballot because you were too lazy to go to a polling place, and then it's received three days later, tough luck. There are lots of reasons we invalidate ballots in this country. You mark them improperly, you wrote your name down wrong. Like, there are lots of reasons why your ballot might not count if you don't abide by the rules, then that is what it is. If you don't abide by the rules, I'm not sure why the rules have to change to accommodate you. That's silly, because otherwise you are opening the door to widespread voter intimidation and voter fraud. The case is a potential blockbuster, according to the New York Times, that asks the justices to determine the meaning of election day. The challenge to the Mississippi law reflects political fights over the increased use of mail in ballots, which exploded during the COVID pandemic in 2024. The RNC, along with the Mississippi Republican Party and individual voters, challenged Mississippi's mail in ballot rules. The challengers argued Congress had intended voting take place on a single election day, and allowing ballots to arrive days later and still be counted undermined election integrity and the public's trust in the vote. I mean, obviously that's true. Obviously that's true. Now, again, they're, they're claiming that as long as the ballot was postmarked by election day, you should be okay. That is the counterclaim. The problem is, do you want your elections to. To carry on for days on end? Is that a thing that we want to incentivize? And the answer is pretty clearly no. And meanwhile, on the foreign policy front, we have now been treated to the bizarre spectacle of a terrorist who put on a suit. And now we're supposed to pretend that he's no longer a terrorist in any way. I understand that relations with Syria are complex after the fall of Bashar Assad, which again I said at the time was going to open a huge number of problems, as well as the possibility of future opportunities. Well, both those things have been true. The person who ended up taking over was a former Al Qaeda and ISIS terrorist. That person whose name is Ahmed Al Shara, he decided to visit the White House yesterday. Syria. The United States is trying to broker some sort of deal between Syria and. And Israel. The Turks basically run Syria at this point. It's a great unmentioned elephant in the room in the Middle east right now is not Iran, it's not Israel, it's not Saudi, it's Turkey. Turkey has been spreading its wings, attempting to extend the range of its neo Ottoman Empire through Syria. There's no question that's what Turkey has been doing. Erdogan is in fact a radical Islamist who supports terrorism throughout the region. The fact that Turkey is a member of NATO is insane, totally insane. And so the matter in Syria has become complicated because militias, largely backed by the Syrian government, or at least with the Syrian government looking the other way, those militias have been going in and slaughtering Druze in the south of Syria. The State of Israel, which of course has a large Druze population, has been attempting to defend the Druze because the Druze, again, being quite tribal, are willing to literally walk over the border to Syria and just start fighting on behalf of their brothers. And so things are pretty complicated over in Syria. With that said, there are possible, possible openings in Syria if the United States is willing to tell the Turks to back down. According to the Wall Street Journal, Syria has now joined the US Led mission to defeat isis. The move marks a significant turnaround in the US Relationship with Syria. The decision is a sign of Syria's transition from a driver of Middle east instability as a result of former President Bashar Al Assad's violent crackdown on his own people, which allowed ISIS to flourish into an ally, aiding an American led military operation to keep ISIS at bay. There's talk about opening embassies in the capital of Damascus or Syria reopening its Embassy in Washington, D.C. and the President met with this person who again was a terrorist and has terrorist sympathies. Can he be turned around? We're going to find out in very, very short order. Trump's special envoy for Syria, Tom Barrack, has traveled to Damascus twice in the past six weeks. Andrew Tabler, an expert on Syria at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said Trump went all in with Shara. They see it as an opportunity to reorient Syria away from US Adversaries like Iran and toward Washington, the Arab Gulf and Turkey. This is big stuff. Well, I mean, again, that is treating Turkey, I think, with a little more respect than Turkey deserves at this point, given its support for, again, Hamas in the Gaza Strip and its openly Islamist attempts to turn its regime from a secularist regime into a Sharia regime under Erdogan. This is complicated stuff. I do not envy the president attempting to work things out in Syria. We'll have to see again whether Syria turns into yet another failed terror state or whether they are held to account by the West. Meanwhile, in a piece of salutary news, the IOC has now decided to ban transgender women, meaning men, from all female Olympic events. That would be the International Olympic Committee. This has become, of course, a very hot issue given the fact that last time at the Olympics, men were fighting women in boxing. According to the New York Post, the International Olympic Committee is reportedly set to ban trans women from competing in all female categories. The change is set to be officially announced early next year. The decision to overhaul the current policy was made after the sporting committee carried out a science based review of a biologically born male's physical advantages. The report claimed there were clear advantages with the athletes who had disorders of sexual development, which is essentially people who have intersex conditions, for example. So now the idea is that women will be competing with women, which of course is a good thing. It is unbelievable that it took an entire cultural revolution in the United States in order to say what is perfectly obvious. Again, that's sort of the way that things work here in the United States these days is that saying the perfectly obvious has now become a matter of serious controversy. Meanwhile, Michelle Obama is out there and she is complaining about life. It is amazing. Again, the number of people in this country who complain about the United States, like quiet United States, who lives the most privileged lives imaginable, is really an amazing, amazing thing. Whether it is Zahra Mohamdani who has lived a life of tremendous privilege here in the United States, or whether it is Michelle Obama, the capacity of the left to be utterly ungrateful about the virtues of America is pretty incredible. So Michelle Obama, she has been complaining about a couple of things. One, she's complaining about the tearing down of the east wing, which again, like the fact that Democrats keep trying to make this an issue, is beyond me.