Loading summary
A
This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50 page restoration block. Or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it, ready to make anything online make sense. There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required compatibility and availability various 18 your next chapter in healthcare starts at Carrington College's School of Nursing in Portland. Join us for our open house on Tuesday, January 13th from 4 to 7pm you'll tour our campus, see live demos, meet instructors, and learn about our Associate Degree in Nursing program that prepares you to become a registered nurse. Take the first step toward your nursing career. Save your spot now at Carrington Edu Events. For information on program outcomes, visit Carrington. Edu Sci. I started Ornod in 2013 and we make bike apparel. The best part of Shopify for me is our ability to run the business as essentially non technical people. We're able to admin everything on the back end, front end, and sell things online easily. If Shopify were a bike accessory, I think it would actually be the bicycle. It's the thing that you do the thing on. We run the business on Shopify, so start your free trial on shopify.com the left increasingly hates the American flag. Why? That's an obvious question. The American flag stands for freedom and prosperity and victory. No matter how many problems you have with America, you ought to be grateful God gave you the opportunity, as he did, for me, to live in the greatest country in the history of humanity. So why do so many people hate the flag? The answer well, that's just how much the left hates President Trump. And now they hate Trump so much they even hate, wait for it. Aoc. Really? I'll explain in just a moment. We'll also get to why Texas wants to teach school kids the Bible, why a radically anti Israel, militantly gay San Francisco congressional candidate is under fire from the left. And the latest in Iran, where President Trump launched some bombs over the weekend. This is the Ben Shapiro Show. So it's been true forever. President Trump's magic power is that whatever he touches, his opposition disowns. So if he takes an 80% position, his opposition will take the 20% position. Just because they hate him so much. If he decides that he likes rock music and MMA and fighter jets, the left will say all of those things are awful. If he decides that, you know, it'd be awesome. A really cool fair on the Washington Mall. The left will decide that the fair is really, really bad just because they hate him that much. He if he decides that we need a better lining for the reflecting pool, the left will go nuts and say it's better if the place is essentially a swamp. So if President Trump hugs an American flag, the left will just by necessity, want to burn it. Now, the left should stop doing this because it's really, really bad and really, really stupid. If we are going to share anything in this country, we should love the American flag. And again, if you go back, historically, the people who most had reason not to like the American flag still found a way to love the American flag. Because it turns out that if you root for the principles of America, eventually the American flag ends up flying for those principles. To take the most famous example, Frederick Douglass, the escaped slave back in the 1850s, gave a speech on July 4th asking what July 4th was to the slave. The whole thing was a critique, this speech, of the idea that the Declaration of Independence did not properly apply to black people. And his complaint was not that the Declaration of Independence was wrong or bad or the American flag was wrong or bad, but why were black people not included in that promise? And then, of course, a civil war was fought. And over the course of 100 years, Jim Crow was extirpated specifically to fulfill Frederick Douglass's vision of a July 4th that stood for all Americans. That's the best way to approach the American flag, because that same American flag that was flying over in America, that tolerated slavery flew with the troops wearing blue as they fought the Confederates in favor of abolishing slavery. Okay, but today, the left has decided, apparently in large scale, that the American flag is just too uncomfortable. There's a large piece at NBC News today titled many Americans say Stars and Stripes is now a red flag Quote. To fly or not to fly an American flag. That was never a question for Bruce Watson, who has put his national pride on display for years and and nudges neighbors in his small New England town to do the same. But as the polarized Nation marks its 250th birthday, Watson, 72, worries his stars and Stripes may now need an asterisk. If we do fly the flag, we will also put out signs to make it clear that we are not maga, he said. So first of all, it's unbelievable, truly amazing that the left has allowed the right to basically treat the flag as a right wing symbol. The American flag is not a right wing symbol. It is A symbol of all of the values of America. And if the left wishes to surrender that to the right, I suppose they can. But it's a bold move, Cotton. Not sure why they would do it. So apparently a bunch of people on the left are going to fly the flag, but upside down to protest President Trump, apparently. One person interviewed by NBC News is replacing the US flag with the state flag of Pennsylvania. Aaron Beltol, 22, who lives outside Philadelphia with her parents, said her father will be flying the American flag. But she says if it were up to me and my mom, we'd be flying the Pride flag or the Philadelphia Eagles flag instead. I love our country, but I'm not feeling very proud of our country right now, which, again, is an insane proposition. That's insane. Like a. You feel more loyalty and love for the Philadelphia Eagles than you do for the country. The Philadelphia. Do you play for the Philadelphia Eagles? And by the way, even if you do play for the Philadelphia Eagles, you should still love the American flag more than you love the symbol of the Philadelphia Eagles, the Pride flag, as a replacement for the American flag. We'll get to that in a moment, because that is, in fact, the default replacement flag for the American flag, according to NBC News. Some readers said they were motivated by peer pressure more than patriotism. I just play my flag outside my home, mainly because everyone else around my neighborhood does it, even though I'm not 100% proud to be an American, said a New Town, Pennsylvania woman who also asked to remain anonymous. I feel if I don't have a flag displayed somewhere, people will think I'm against our country or something. Well, I mean, kind of like, why would it be bad to fly the American flag? A Rhode island teacher said she too is flying alternate flags, the Rainbow Pride flag and the banner of her beloved New England Patriots. The teacher said she had not flown the flag since 2024, when Trump was elected for a second term. I have a gay son and a trans son and felt that the flag was now a symbol flown by people who don't want my children to exist. So herein lies the problem again. The American flag is a symbol. Symbols have underlying meanings. Those symbols stand for things. Right? The swastika stands for something different than the American flag, stands for something different than the Pride Progress flag. So what does the American flag stand for historically? Well, most obviously the promise of the Declaration of Independence, whose 250th anniversary are celebrating this year the greatness of the American Constitution, the greatest system of government ever devised by man. And yes, a set of values rooted in the Bible. Because it turns out that the Declaration and the Constitution were not born out of arid soil. They didn't spring full blown from the heads of the men who wrote them. They are the apex of a system of values that was rooted thousands of years beforehand. So if you don't like those things, then you probably are doing Americanism wrong. You're failing to understand what it is that makes America great and makes America awesome, regardless of your politics. And this is why it is bizarre that there's a gigantic controversy that is now broken out in the state of Texas over whether or not kids should learn about the Bible. Not that kids should be preached to, that they must believe in Christ, or that they must believe that Moses brought laws down from Mount Sinai or something. But there are people who are very upset that people are being taught the Bible in public schools. But coming up, we'll get to why the left hates America oh, so much and what they want to replace the American flag with. First, last week I sat down with Medal of Honor recipient Clint Romesha. One thing that always stands out after conversations like that is this. The people who have served this country, they don't talk about themselves as heroes. They talk about duty and about the people beside them, about doing the job that needed to be done. As America approaches its 250th birthday, it's worth remembering. Our country's story isn't just about documents and speeches. It's about. It's about the generations of Americans who answered that call when freedom depended on them. When those men and women come home, our responsibility as fellow Americans does not end. Which is why I'm proud that PureTalk is partnering with America's Warrior Partnership to raise $250,000 for veterans. America's Warrior Partnership is on the front lines of preventing veteran suicide by helping veterans access housing, transportation, counseling, VA benefits and other essential services. They provide practical support that helps veterans build stable, successful lives. After service. When you switch your cell phone service to Pure Talk this month, you'll have the opportunity to round up your bill in support of America's Warrior partnership. PureTalk will match donations until they reach $250,000. You'll also get unlimited talk, unlimited text, and unlimited high speed data for just $34.99 a month. That's a fraction of what the major carriers charge. Head ON over to PureTalk.com Shapiro make the switch to PureTalk. Again, that's PureTalk.com Shapiro make the Switch. My wireless company, America's Wireless Company, Pure Pure Talk Patriotism isn't just something you feel on the Fourth of July. It's how you choose to support the people who have served this country when they come home. So President Trump, on Friday, he was in the Oval Office and he was talking about religious liberty, because the Religious Liberty Commission for President Trump issued a draft report saying that the separation of church and state is a legal error and that Americans should view religion as an essential support and remember the Creator who made us and bestows our rights. And that, by the way, is correct. Because again, the Constitution does not mean that you are supposed to separate religion completely out of daily life. That government can have no admixture at all with anything baseline religious. That is not what the First Amendment says. Here is the President talking about this. America was founded by people of faith, and it was settled as a haven for religious freedom. So important as we prepare to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our founding next week, it is only appropriate that we work to strengthen this fundamental right and to most essentially have liberty for generations to come. We want religious liberty. Okay, so what does religious liberty mean? Well, obviously, the verbiage of the First Amendment says the Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or abridging the free exercise thereof. Historically speaking, a lot of people have read this wrong. There's a letter of Thomas Jefferson's in which he talks about a wall of separation between church and state. But Thomas Jefferson himself saw biblical thinking as undergirding Western values. He wrote the 1786 Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. And Jefferson, who was himself a deist, but who also wrote a version of the New Testament in which he stripped out all the miracles, he said, quote, almighty God hath created the mind free, that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishment or burdens or by civil incapacitations tend only to be at habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who, being lord of both body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was his almighty power to do so. Again, that is in the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. So, basically, because Christian values suggest that you are supposed to allow for the free exercise of mind, that is why there should be free exercise of religion. But understand the basic supposition of a First Amendment that allows for freedom of religion is a religious assessment of the world that God created individuals with freedom of mind and inherent value, and it would be an abridgment of that. Mind and freedom of choice for the government to cram down religion on you. It should also be worth noting that actually, many of the original states did have an established religion. But again, what are those clauses meant to do? Well, those clauses are supposed to be read in tandem. Okay. The idea is that Congress should not make a law respecting an establishment of religion. So Congress should not, for example, force you to go and receive communion. Congress should not force you to go pray three times a day. But that's to be read in. In the context of abridging the free exercise thereof. Why? Because the idea was that if Congress establishes one form of religion, it was would bar all the other forms of religion, and this would inhibit your free exercise. And notice the words free exercise. That does not mean free thought, because thought is different from exercise. Religion does not just exist in the private sphere. It's not just something that you do in your church and in your home. It's something you do your whole life. And this is something that the founders understood, being largely religious and growing up in a religious society. The sociologist Emil Durkheim wrote, quote, a religious society does not exist without a collective credo, and it is more or less strong and united according to whether this credo is widely held. And all the founders understood this, by the way, including the most secular leaning of the founders, President John Adams, My favorite founder, wrote in a letter to the Massachusetts militia, famously, quote, we have no government armed with power, capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest chords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our constitution was made only for immoral and religious people. George Washington said the same, quote, the foundation of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality. There exists in the economy and course of nature an indissoluble union between virtue and happiness. Even James Madison, who authored provisions in the state of Virginia banning the establishment of religion, said he did so in order to strengthen religion because he believed that religious discrimination would lead people to. To abandon religion. Jefferson himself recognized, quote, the moral branch of religion instructs us how to live well and worthily in society. Also, by the way, you are just not a literate western citizen. If you don't know the Bible, you are not literate. That is not opinion. That is fact. Virtually all of the western canon, everything from Dickens to Shakespeare, everything from the works of the founding fathers to the words of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, cannot be understood without some reference point in the Bible. This is particularly true for the founding era. By the way, there's a political scientist named Donald Lutz, and he actually went through 15,000 sources of political writing from the founding era. He cataloged all of them. What is the single most cited source in the founding literature? Not Locke like you heard in school, or Montesquieu. It's the Bible, of course, like a third of all citations. And the single most cited book was the book of Deuteronomy, which makes perfect sense because the book of Deuteronomy is how do you govern and a nation? What is the moral law that you use to govern a nation? So why is this relevant? Well, because a lot of people today are pretending that we're about to live in a theocracy. Because the Texas State Board of Education has voted to require students to study the Bible stories, which, by the way, again, you should. If you wish to have any basic literacy in your civilization, you need to know the Bible. You may notice I am not a Christian. I am a Jew. I know the New Testament because in order for you to understand the literature that you are reading, you must understand the New Testament. It is not possible to read anything from Victor Hugo to Dostoevsky without understanding the New Testament. Not a possibility. You cannot do it. Educated, literate, literate citizens have to know this stuff. And they have to know it not because we are saying that the state must force you to go to church. You have to know it because otherwise you literally don't understand the roots of your own civilization. You just don't. So what exactly is the tech State Board of Education doing? So you've heard from all your left wing friends that they are now forcing everybody to kneel, essentially. That is not right. That is not right. They have approved a proposal that establishes a list of required reading. According to cnn, it includes Bible verses alongside classic titles. For ITS K through 12 English and literature curriculum, Texas is prescribing a literary canon for every public school student. Many Texas students are already familiar with at least some Christian teachings. The state last year became the largest state to require classrooms to display the Ten Commandments. First of all, I find it funny that CNN is so illiterate that they say that those are Christian teachings. I mean, to be fair, the Ten Commandments is part of the Old Testament. Okay, so you want to talk about truly Judeo Christian Ten Commandments would fall squarely in the Judeo Christian category since, you know, it arrived on the scene some thousand years before Christ. In any case, the new list of required titles will include a Picture book adaptation of the David and Goliath story for elementary students, which of course, again, how are you even literate? How are you literate if you don't know the David and Goliath story? It is referenced in an enormous percentage of Western literature. All the founders knew it. Okay, biblical passages about Adam and Eve for older students. Well, yes, duh, because you have to know that stuff. You can't read Shakespeare without understanding these biblical references. The actual proposals include a bunch of other texts from the Bible, including verses from the book of Luke about the necessity of humility for fifth graders, the burning bush and the parting of the Red Sea. Again, Benjamin Franklin, not exactly a deeply religious person, wanted the parting of the Red Sea to be put on the official seal of the United States. You cannot understand the anti slavery movement without understanding the book of Exodus. It is not possible to do so. All, all of the anti slavery advocates were quoting the book of Exodus. All of them. Martin Luther King Jr. Quoted the book of Exodus all the time. Sections from the books of Matthew and Psalms and Ecclesiastes. And again, all this stuff is stuff that you should just know. A section from Matthew about anxiousness or the Shepherd's Psalm from Psalms. I mean, come on, you know, it's in every movie. What did you, what did you think they were saying in the movie at every single grave site scene? What do you think that they're quoting right there? The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. What do you think they're quoting? They just like made it up. What? Or Ecclesiastes to everything there is a season. I mean, the Beatles were writing songs to some of this stuff. And then the Book of Job for high school standardized testing expectations. I mean, like what, what is remotely controversial about all of this? What is remotely controversial? The answer is nothing, by the way. Also, the curriculum includes the book of Lamentations from the Torah. Right. Which is the book. It's Jeremiah. He's writing that. And then high school world history includes beliefs of the Quran and the actual history of slavery globally. And Washington's letter to a Hebrew congregation in Newport, which basically talks about religious freedom in the United States. And Elie Wiesel and Anne Frank like the idea that there's some gigantic establishment of a Christian theocracy because you're literate is insane. But again, the reason that the left is fighting this is because if you are unfamiliar with the roots of the American flag, then you get to replace it with anything. If you stand for nothing, then you will stand for anything. And that is where we are going next. If the American flag stands for the Declaration and the Constitution and a set of biblical values that undergird all of that and you reject all of that, well, where do you end up? Well, we have an opposite flag and that opposite flag is the representation of the radical left these days. This flag is pretty much everything already. Coming up, we'll get to the radicals replacement for the American flag. It's really quite hideous. First, America was built by people who worked hard and also had to get some sleep. You know, if you're not sleeping well, you're not operating at full capacity. This country needs you at full capacity. We have a 250th birthday coming up. You need to be ready. And this is where Helix comes in the fourth of July. It's coming. And how exactly are you going to party it up unless you've had some sleep? Helix exists to make sure that that happens for you. They offer over 20 mattress models. Take a quick quiz, get matched to the right one for how you actually sleep. Your position, your temperature, your firmness preference, all of it. Free shipping, a 120 night sleep trial. They're happy with Helix guarantee. They make it completely risk free. It's the most awarded mattress brand out there, tested and reviewed by Forbes and Wired. The fourth is just days away. Invest in your sleep, invest in yourself. Go to helixleep.com Ben get 20% off site wide, 25% off Lux mattresses, 30% off Elite mattresses. That's helix sleep.com Men for 20% off site wide, 25 percent off Luxe mattresses, 30% off those Elite mattresses. Again. My wife and I have a Helix sleep mattress. We do. Took that sleep quiz. A mattress made just for us is particularized for us. Just one of the many reasons America is awesome. Go check out helixsleep.com Ben this is from the Seattle Pride march. A hybrid Palestine trans flag. Yes. Radical Islam and radical transgenderism all in one flag. Now of course it would be weird for that to sit in one flag. In fact, if you tried to fly this in Gaza, you would immediately be shoved off the top of a building or dragged behind a motorcycle. That's how things would end for you in in the Gaza Strip or for that matter in Ramallah. But the idea is that this is the set of values. The set of values is opposed to all the things. It's opposed to all the things it turns out. That's not enough to fly a Philadelphia Eagles flag or New England Patriots flag instead of the American flag. If you actively do not like the American flag and the things it stands for. Sooner or later, later you will end up at the hybrid Palestine Trans flag. That's where you'll end up. And in terms of governing, this is where we are going. This is where we are going. So Zoran Mamdani is the Palestine Trans flag in a human. In a human, that is Zoran Mandani. He despises America and the principles that it stands for, despises them, believes that all of the founding principles of America are wrong. And so he unifies in his very personage, radical Islam and trans Pride, progress. That is who Mamdani is. That is the future of the left. So over the weekend, Mamdani played tribute to Ashura. He put out a tweet saying, ashura is a time. It shows him at mosque. Again. You should know that when. When he does this routine where he's a religious Muslim and then immediately goes to a pride, progress, protest. If you are a deeply religious Muslim, that is not a thing you do. That is not a thing. It's all taqiyah. It's a lie. Imamdani says Ashura is a time of remembrance, sacrifice and reflection. Today, on the 10th day of Muharram, we are reminded of Imam Hussein's unwavering commitment to truth and dignity. His timeless legacy reminds us of the enduring values of faith, service to one another, and the belief that justice is always worth fighting for. Our city's strength comes from the many faith traditions that shape it and our shared struggle against injustice and oppression. Again, that's the coalition Free Palestine Trans. That's the coalition, Mary. Carry these values forward as we continue building a more just city for every New Yorker. Again, I'm going to need to see the work. Honestly, I want to see. I want to show the work. How did Ashura shape America? Also, by the way, we should point out that Ashura is a sectarian holiday. It is not even a general Islamic holiday like Ramadan or something. It is sectarian. Shia Muslims mourning Ashura because it commemorates what they call the martyrdom of Hussein IBN Ali, who is Muhammad's grandson, at the Battle of Karbala in 680 CE. Sunni Islam observes it as a day of gratitude and fasting to celebrate the day that Allah saved the Prophet Moses from Pharaoh. So again, two different and sectarian views of even that holiday. So we're bringing, like, Islamic sectarianism to New York and then pretending that it's in unison with pride, progress. So here was Zoran Mandani, who again praises every Radical Islamic group he can find being cheered at the pride march. The Pride Progress flag, the Free Palestine flag, they're the same. Why? Because what do they share? What do they share? In the end, the thing they hate is the American flag. Darieliza Chevalier, when she said that she wanted to wipe her hands on the American flag, she was not lying. She was not lying. Here's some footage from New York over the weekend. There he is walking. They're all so excited. They're so excited. Oh, what happens to gay people in Uganda? Nothing. Nothing pleasant where he is from. Meanwhile, the New York City pride chanted bottoms, tops. We all hate cops. Which is really the important thing. It's man hating the system that the cops are literally standing there protecting this. You know, people, people running around chanting about whether they wish to pitch or catch. Great stuff happening in New York. With the Trans Pride Progress flag. Just wonderful, wonderful stuff here. Buzurg. Mom, Donnie says, hey, you know what? The Democratic Party is a big tent. It's a big tent. As it turns out, it's not that big. We'll get to the smallness of the tent in a second. But this is what a takeover looks like. But they're saying that if you're a socialist, you're not a Democrat. I mean, is there room in the party for both of these views? Yes, here I am. Here are so many more. And I think what makes our party a beautiful party is the fact that it's a big tent that we have. But you've also said it has to be a party with a spine, with a backbone. Yes, Even a tent has to stay up. What's the tent pole? God, the smugness. The smugness of this anti American jacket. It's unbelievable. Then he denies that he wants to run for president. Well, I mean, first of all, he can't. There's a constitutional bar to people who are born abroad running for president. But you know, Democrats would love to get rid of that for sure. For Zoran Mandani. For Zoran Mandani specifically. Not for somebody who actually, you know, likes America. I noticed that you're turning 35 soon, right? In a few months. Yes. So you, you now hit one of the constitutional requirements to run for president. But there's another one that says you have to be a natural born citizen. You were not born here. Yes, but do you think that's something that should be changed in the Constitution? It would take an amendment. But do you think that we should change that? No, I think the Constitution looks good the way it is. Just the way it is. Just the way it is. I'm very excited to focus on New York City, but thank you for reminding me of my upcoming 35 years old. He's lying, by the way. I'm just gonna put it out there. That is not true. He would absolutely love for them to change the constitution in this direction. Meanwhile, Zoramdani, it's amazing while he is tweeting about Ashura and by the way, while he is literally going to the Pakistan Day parade in Brooklyn, ok, Pakistan Islamic. It's an Islamist hellhole. Pakistan is a Sharia law country. I'm going to flashback to August 2025, Zormandani marching at the Pakistan Day parade in Brooklyn. Okay? Pakistan Day, again. Pakistan is. Is an Islamist country that punishes homosexuality by law. This is how you know he's a liar. He's a liar. Here he was celebrating Pakistan Independence Day. Look, he's so happy. Happy. He's so much happier than he is. That pride parade. He is overjoyed walking the Pakistan Day parade. Now, Mamdani famously did not show up at the Israel Day Parade, which you would assume since he hates Jews. But here he was explaining to John Carl that the reason that he actually doesn't like the Jewish state is because he just doesn't like any state that has religion attached to it. Because he's lying. He is a liar. And the idea of a Jewish state, Israel, is a Jewish state, that's in the charter. That's the way it is now. Do you support that? I've said time and again that I support the state of Israel as a state with equal rights. I believe that any state that president does a Jewish state is the question. I think any state that privileges one religion over the other is one that I can't tell you I support, whether it be Israel or Saudi Arabia or anywhere else. And a lot of that comes back to a fundamental belief that we should all be considered equal no matter what our faith is. He's lying. He's absolutely lying. But if you believe him, then you're a stupid person. A truly stupid person. You must have been dropped as a baby multiple times. But apparently God filled the world with people who have been dropped as babies. There's no other way to explain it. The Democratic Party, again, this is their flag. Their flag is the Pride, Progress, Free Palestine flag. One of their other candidates, Abdul El Sayed, he is likely to be the nominee in Michigan for Senate. And. And here he is ripping simultaneously on Chuck Schumer, the Senate Minority Leader, as well as of course, apac, which again apac, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is just a PAC in that. That Jews and Christians give to in favor of the existence of the State of Israel. And of course a health care. He says he's. He's dangerous to healthcare CEOs understand. It's so crazy saying this kind of stuff. A health care CEO was just shot last year to death. Don't worry, he's dangerous to health care CEOs though. That's the important thing. I'm not dangerous. If you need government to work for you, I sure am dangerous. You're one of those folks who's a corporation or a special interest or a politician who does their bidding. Who's stopping government from working for you. Yeah. If you're Chuck Schumer, I'm dangerous. If you're aipac, I'm dangerous. If you're a co pack, I'm dangerous. If you're Blue Cross Blue Shield CEO, I'm pretty damn dangerous. If you're 18, I for sure am dangerous. But if you're somebody who needs government to work for you, if you. I aim to be the best friend you ever had. If. If you're an American who loves America. These people are dangerous. Dangerous. The Democratic socialists of America, of course stand behind Mamdani. They stand behind Abdul El Sayed and all the rest of this nonsense. National Steering Committee member David Jenkins explains what their goal is. The answer is communism. By the way, he is a mime. He is a mime. The theater kids have taken over these dorks. You're going to give these dorks power. This is. This is your choice, America. According to the New York Post, Flatbush theater kid David Jenkins was elected last year to the DSA's National Political Committee. He's a self avowed anti capitalist, which you could imagine. I understand why you'd be anti capitalist if you're a mime. Because ain't nobody paying you to be a mime. So you got to find some other economic system where someone will pay you. Be a professional useless person who can't get out of even imaginary box. He apparently is a proud founder of the Broken Box Mime Theater where he performs pantomime to a heart thumping soundtrack in full mime makeup like something out of Tangled. Here he is explaining what America should do. I mean, our goal is liberation. Our goal is communism. My name is David Jenkins. I'm a lifelong New Yorker. And today I am again calling on the city council to disband the NYPD Brutal Unnecessary Strategic Response Group and directly Dive divert its funding to any, any of the public services fellow New Yorkers have called for. Today. I'm planning to run for the NPC at convention under the banner of the Libertarian Socialist Caucus. We're a diverse body of libertarian socialists, libertarian Marxists, anarchists less communists and other schools of thought within the sort of left wing socialist movement. This is what they are, this is what they are and this is what they are going to be. And it's coming to a city near you over in Colorado. There is a congressional candidate, Milat Keyrose, who's supported of course by Hassan piker and the DSA. This person is running against a 15 term member of the House Progressive Caucus named Diana Dejet. That lady is so wildly to the left of JET that her platform includes abolishing ice, expanding affordable housing and childcare, Medicare for all, authoring of defending all energy and climate regulation, and endorsed by Planned Parenthood. And it doesn't matter because Malat Kirosh is outflanking her. Okay. Because again, what it comes down to for the radical left is hatred of the country. Understand that is the feature, not the bug. I know normally Americans, we look at this and we're like, what the hell? How is it that somebody like Zormadani could win despite being radically anti American, radically pro Islamic terrorism, radically pro trans radicalism? How? How could he win? Is he won because of those things? Understand, whatever is most opposed to the fundamental bases of America and Western civilization, whatever is most opposed to those things, that is the reason that they are winning. Because for generations we have ceded a deep hatred of the country. A deep hatred of the country. Here is Milat Kirosh running through her platform, which by the way is psychotic, of course, to see what are your five main policy proposals? Medicare for all housing. First, universal child care, abolishing ice. And more than anything, the thing that I'm the most focused on is publicly financed elections. Okay. Yeah. Wow, that's cool. All right, now we're going to do rapid fire. Okay. Do you support Medicare for all? Yes. Do you support universal child care? Yes. The elder care and elder care. Okay. You know, I'm not in favor of giving Boomers anything, but that's fine. You know, that's the difference between you and I guess the abolition of ice? Yes. The Green New Deal. Yes. National rent control? Yes. Interesting. Ending the embargo on Cuba. Yes. Ending the embargo on. Ending the war in Iran? Yes. Ending aid to Israel? Yes. Sanctioning Israel? Yes. A free Palestine? Yes. Okay. That's who she she is probably going to win in Colorado. This is a lady who says openly that the 911 attacks were inevitable. Okay, this is just Osama bin Laden. Okay, she just sounds like Osama bin Laden if you just read the quotes back to back. She and bin Laden saying the same thing, period. By the way, also said by Jeremiah Wright, Obama sat in his church for 20 years. Here we go. Do you believe that the 911 terrorist attacks on America were the inevitable consequence of American foreign policy? I believe that the quote in which that is probably being referenced by in the context in which it was happening was referencing a Pentagon official who was talking about the acts that America was taking and in parts of the Middle East. I want to clarify. I'm just asking you about your own words. Your frame of the October 7 attacks was that that was an inevitable consequence for Israel based on its actions. And I'm asking you, was 911 an inevitable consequence for America based on US foreign policy? Inevitable in the sense that we destabilized a lot of the Middle east that forced people to believe that another act of violence was the only response. And again, just like I said before, our responsibility is to getting rid of those conditions that lead to violence in the first place. Okay, this is just Osama Bin Laden crap. It's just. This is Osama Bin Laden's letter. Remember a few years ago it went viral on TikTok when a bunch of Gen zers discovered Osama Bin Laden's letter and then they said they agreed with it. That is the future if the DSA candidates continue to win. If you replace the American flag with something, it's got to be replaced by. It doesn't get replaced by the Philadelphia Eagles flag because people cannot find solidarity enough in a Philadelphia Eagles flag. They can only find solidarity across this coalition of the supposedly dispossessed in hatred for the American flag. And so the symbol of burning the American flag is that trans Palestine flag. That's what it is. I mean a lot. Kirosh is exactly this thing. And by the way, there is no gap between this point of view about America and just wrote anti Semitism, just pure open Jew hatred. For example, Mila Kirosh was asked about a Colorado attacker named Mohammed, Mohammed Sabri Soliman. You remember this case? This is a person who used a makeshift flamethrower to attack a group of people participating in a solidarity walk for hostages taken on October 7th. This person yelled enzymest free Palestine and how many children killed? And then threw a Molotov cocktail, essentially set an old woman on fire. And killed her. This, this person was an Egyptian national who claimed asylum and entered the United States. So she was asked about the Colorado attacker. Here was her answer. I don't know what was in the heart of the perpetrator. All I know is that he went and attacked innocent people because of what they might have believed. And I don't even know what the people that, that were at that protest believed too. In fact, most of them were probably just there to, you know, ask that the people who were kidnapped during October 7th be returned home to their families. That's not a political statement in and of itself. I think the fact that we're having a conversation about whether it was anti Zionism or anti Semitism is, you know, a political debate that, you know, I think everyone has the freedom to have. But to it was a loss of innocent life, regardless of what the perpetrator had in mind when he took those lives. Matters less to me than, you know, our responsibility to making sure that people understand that even in the face of these kinds of disagreements, that violence is not the answer. But you wouldn't, you would not describe it as anti Semitism. I don't, I don't know. I don't know what his intentions were. It's not anti Semitic to attack a Jewish marching on behalf of 10-7-hostages because that you might be pro Israel. So that means it's ok, because anti Zionism is ok. So the motivations were ok, as long as you don't shout kill the Jew, you just shout kill the Zionist while you kill a Jew, then it's totally ok. According to Malaki Rosh. Well, then the mask falls totally away. Ok? There are some people still trying to uphold that mask. But it is very, very satisfying on a moral level when the mask fully falls away and you finally see what lies beneath this anti Zionist mask. Okay, when you see what lies beneath the ugly veil. Again, the roots of anti Zionism, particularly on the left in America, lie in Soviet propaganda in the 1950s and 1960s that was then taken up by the global left as a, as basically an element of third world philosophy. That Zionism was somehow different from any other national liberation movement and that Zionism is racism and Zionism is apartheid. And, and basically every argument that you could actually apply against America, you just call Zionism and then you target Jews with it. In any case, that's been the mask that people hide behind for a long time on this particular issue. Because what you're talking about when you talk about anti Zionism in the modern world, which is what she's talking about there is the destruction of the state of Israel, which would have to amount to the murder of several million Jews in the Middle East. In any case, sometimes the mask just totally falls away. So I bring to you, I present to you the most satisfying case of the day. There is an awful California legislator named Scott Wiener. Scott Weiner has been in the California assembly for years and years and years and years. The California State Senate. This is the man who stood behind the decriminalization of people having sex with other people with AIDS without telling them. This person tried to essentially decriminalize, preying on minors. Scott Wiener, he is trash. He's an awful person. But. But Scott Wiener is also a Jew, okay? So he meets all of the criteria of the left. All the criteria of the left, okay? And for a little while, for a little while, he said that what happened in Gaza was not a genocide. Because of course, what happened in Gaza was not in fact, a genocide. And the way you can tell it's not a genocide is for the million and a half people who are 2 million people who are alive in Gaza right now. And we can get into the civilian to terrorist death ratio in Gaza or the targeting procedures used by the Israelis. Suffice it to say, in the category of people who have been dropped directly on their heads are the people who pretend that. That what happened in Gaza's genocide. Well, Scott Wiener was pressured by the left. And so Scott Wiener decided that he was going to give up the ghost back in January. So in January, under pressure from the left, he decided that despite the fact that he was Jewish, despite was going to pretend that what happened in Gaza was a genocide. So here he was back in January. Yeah, again, you can run away from Jewishness, but your Jewishness will not run away from you, as it turns out. Here is Scott Weiner. I want to clarify that I do believe Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. As a Jew, I am deeply aware that the word genocide was created in the wake of the Holocaust, which was the industrial extermination of 6 million Jews. For many Jews, associating the word genocide with the Jewish state of Israel is deeply painful and frankly, traumatic. But despite that pain and that trauma, we all have eyes and we see the absolute devastation and catastrophic death toll in Gaza inflicted by the Israeli government. Okay? So this pathetic and ridiculous coward, it turns out it wasn't enough. It turns out that as Winston Churchill suggested, the strategy of appeasement, whereby you feed the crocodile, hoping it eats you last, eventually it eats you too. So Scott Weiner shows up at the trans march and again, Scott Wiener is the dude. You've seen the picture of him before wearing bondage gear at the pride marches. That's who Scott Wiener is. Well, here he is at a trans march and they basically yell at him again. He said the thing they wanted, right? He said that Israel is committing a genocide, which is a lie. He said all this stuff. But again, remember, it's not enough that the flag has trans on it. It also has Free Palestine on it. And Free Palestine means you have to hate Jews. That's what it means. And so because you're not arguing in favor of the establishment of a democratic Palestinian state rife with western freedoms and values, what you are arguing for is the establishment of a terrorist state in the middle of the Middle east that targets Jews and literally pays people to murder them. So Scott Weiner does not fulfill one half, even though he tried to. He tried his best, guys. He tried his best. He tried super duper duper hard to fulfill all the various sides of the Free Palestine Pride, progress, flag. He tried, but it didn't matter because at the end of the day, he's still a Jew. So here's what happened to him at the trans march. You've been wonderful for trans people. Terrible. And you've terrible. You've been terrible. You've been terrible on Gaza. You do not belong here anymore, Scott. And it breaks my heart. It, my heart. It breaks my heart. Someone who wrote good legislation for queers is so terrible Gaza. It breaks his heart that somebody who is so pro the queers is also so terrible on Gaza. Even though it didn't matter, he said the words, it didn't matter. It didn't matter. He went to the Mission District again, another one of these radically left wing areas of San Francisco. And here he was being harassed by Free Palestine activists. Hey, bro. Hey, you gotta get the out here, bro. It's Free Palestine here. You already know what it is. We against the genocide. You think you gonna come to my neighborhood, bro? You up? You up. It's gonna be a problem. There's innocent children being killed in Palestine. You gonna come here like it's good, but you're pushing that genocidal agenda as a Zionist, bro, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about him. This is the. That is the reason why a lot of people can't live in San Francisco no more. When there were people voting to live in San Francisco for low income housing, you voted against it. I know my. This coward, this coward, he deserves Every bit of this. He deserves every single thing that's happening to him right now. Yes, we live in a free society and that means people should not be harassed. But you earn the harassment when you decide to give in to the harassers, when you decide that you are going to cave to all of their nonsense, terrible principles and then they come after you when the revolution eats its own. I'm not going to pretend to be upset about it. You deserve. It doesn't mean he deserves violence done against him. It means that he deserves the ire of the people that he thought were his fellow travelers. He put out a statement in which he said, last night, I attended the Trans March as I've done each year for the past 22 years, since the first March in 2004. I attend each year in solidarity with our trans siblings who are facing existential threats from right wing extremists, including the President. As I walk through Dolores park to participate in a Trans Led Pride Shabbat Shabbat service. Let me just tell you something, as somebody who takes Shabbat pretty seriously. No such thing as a Trans Led Pride Shabbat Service. That is not a thing. That is not real. Ok? In connection with the Trans Marsh, a group of people began screaming at me, ran up to me, surrounded me and began harassing me, both verbally and physically, including physical contact. They made statements about my Israeli handlers, among many other inaccurate, extreme and vile statements. They were so physically and verbally aggressive, it was impossible for me to safely remain in the park. As a result, I left the park and for the first time, I did not participate in. In the Trans March. He said that one time at a bar, he was confronted by somebody shouting at him about his quote unquote tainted bloodline. Oh, well, single tier, world's smallest violin. This is what's going to happen. That revolution, it eats its own always and forever. By the way, the DSA is now so radical they started going after aoc. AOC is not enough for them because she has been saying, signaling that she wants to go mainstream or at least make common cause with Hakeem Jeffries. And that is no longer. Ok, so here is Hasan Piker attacking aoc. AOC is backing Jeffries for speaker. She's as vile as Harris. I don't agree that she's as vile as Harris. I think that's crazy. But I do think that she is far more careful than what this moment requires. That's what I think. I think AOC plays it maybe too safe. Oh, she's playing Too safe for Hassan. Piker. You got to go all the way. Otherwise, you haven't shown sufficient commitment to the cause. Chank Uyghur, who definitely needs, you know, somebody buy that man a subscription of Weight Watchers. In any case, he put out a tweet quote. AOC hasn't endorsed a challenger to an incumbent Democrat in the last two election cycles. She's enthusiastically supporting Hakeem Jeffries for Speaker. If Dems win the House when people were working so hard to get her elected. This is the exact opposite of what we were hoping for. Man, I'm going to enjoy it when they come after the AOCs of the world. It's going to be great. Meanwhile, AOC is trying to make nice with both sides. Well, don't think it's going to work particularly well here. She was. You can't tell them to get out, and then in a presidential cycle, tell them that they have an obligation to vote for you. We're either a team or we're not. And at the end of the day, we need. We all need each other. To our chagrin and to our disagreement and to. To our, you know, great inconvenience. All of us have to accept the reality that we need each other, whether we like it or not. Well, the problem is that the radicals are saying, we don't need you anymore. Or at least we won't need you for very long. So who's funding all of this? Who's funding all of this? Well, I mean, it's really funny. You keep hearing the left say, oh, that's a grassroots movement. So grassroots. Unless your last name is Soros. So apparently, according to the New York Post, George Soros and his son Alex spent $103 million in the midterm election cycle. So far, with the November election still more than four months away, Soros could shatter his own spending record of $128 million, set during the last midterms. Four years ago, when he was the single biggest political donor, virtually all of the money was funneled through the Democracy Political Action Committee. Of that money, a little over half came from George and the other half came from a nonprofit which lists Alex Soros as director in its tax filings. By contrast, Elon has spent $85 million. Andreessen Horowitz has spent $91 million. Miriam Adelson has spent $68 million. APAC has spent $30 million. The public sector unions, by the way, have spent far more than that. The four biggest public sector unions in 2023, 2024, spent $915 million in elections. This is why when you hear Democrats jabber about they want money out of elections, they only mean money they don't agree with. Otherwise they really, really like spending money on elections. Now, as you can see, AOC is trying to make nice. She's trying to make nice. And the mainstream Democratic Party is trying to make nice too. They want to wave an American flag on the one hand reluctantly, and they want to waive that Pride Progress Free Palestine flag in the other. And so Hakeem Jeffries put out a tweet congratulating a bunch of DSA candidates. Claire Valdez, Brad Lander, Michael Lasher and Darieliza Aviation Chevalier in New York. Quote, congratulations to our newest members of the NYC Congressional delegation. We must decisively address the affordability crisis and crush far right extremism. Yes, that's what we must worry about. The entire Democratic Party is now swiveling hard to the left. Gavin Newsom, who by the way is against a wealth tax in California because he recognizes everyone will leave is in favor of it nationally. Now it's time for a national billionaires tax and a new social contract. Think about this. Just 10% of people, 10% of people in this country own two thirds of the wealth. A 30 year old for the first time in American history is not doing better than his or her parents. That's a five alarm fire. American wages have stood still and the costs across the spectrum, cost of living have skyrocketed. The system is fundamentally broken. The federal government tax code, the corporate tax code and the inheritance tax code seem to be written for a different set of Americans. It's time for an economic reset. A true minimum tax. A true minimum tax on billionaires that ensures the people at the very top pay at least the tax rate their own workers pay. We also should end this tax free lifestyle loan. This is the gimmick that allows the ultra wealthy to borrow against against their stock portfolios while reporting no taxable income. She's not going to date you, dude. He's going to get outflanked. He's going to get outflanked. Newsom thinks if he swivels to the left, the DSA is not going to eat his lunch. They will eat his lunch. Whoever Bernie Sanders endorses is the front runner. It's that simple. Because the Democratic Party has no systemic immunity to this Senator Chris Murphy, he is doing the same routine. He says, yeah, capitalism, it's not working. We have to try. What the rent control nonsense of New York. We have to have to try full scale socialism or what? Does the Democratic Party actually need to embrace the moniker of socialism, lean into it? No, but I think we have to understand that people do not believe that this version of capitalism has worked. And frankly, it hasn't worked. I mean, you have 40% of Americans today that are working full time and don't have enough money saved up in the bank for an emergency car repair. Meanwhile, we just saw the first trillionaire made in this economy. This version of capitalism isn't working. So again, again, capitalism is bad. According to Chris Merton, this is where the Democratic Party is going. Senator John Ossoff, who wants to play Obama in Georgia. Again, Ossoff is Jewish, so he's going nowhere, like really fast inside the Democratic Party, because that's the rule. Yeah. He says this is all just revulsion that the corrupt political class guys trying to channel the jet fuel that is the DSA is not going to work. It will explode on you, I promise. Here's what I think we're seeing across the country, and it's happening in both political parties. We are seeing a growing revulsion at the corruption of an entire entrenched political class that especially since the Citizens United decision opened the floodgates to limitless secret corporate funding of politics, has been less and less responsive to the needs of the American people and more and more responsive to powerful donors, whether they're corporate interests or the ultra rich. And I think that that is driving some of the dynamics we're seeing in both political parties right now. Okay, well, we're going to find out whether this works for him. Cory Booker doing the same thing. Oh, no, they're part of our coalition. We need a big tent coalition. Any politician, right or left, who includes in their coalition psychos, the psycho will take over the coalition. If you are trapped in a subway car with a dude with a knife and you say, listen, our subway car must include the dude with the knife. None of the rest of us are wielding knives. But that dude with the knife who is high on lsd, he must be in our subway car. It is our subway car after all, and we need more people in the subway car. At the end of the day, you're going to get held hostage by the dude with the knife. That's how it works. Here's Senator Cory Booker. A lot of people right now are trying to paint the Democratic Party and insinuate division and differences before us. I'm one of these people that believes very clearly. If everybody in your coalition agrees with you on everything, then your coalition isn't big enough. Oh, well, guess what? You are about to be forced to agree with the people who are holding the knife inside your coalition. Fifteen House Democrats have now signed a pledge to promote capitalism over socialism. Now, there are a few dissenters. Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, of course, last sane Democrat in the Senate. He says it's insane that being patriotic has now become partisan. Being patriot patriotic now has becoming, you know, partisan right now. You know, you look at the kinds of polls right now, you know, I think 18% of Democrats were intensely proud to be American or proud of the country. And that, that's truly absurd. You know, like, I mean, you don't have to agree with everyone that's in the White House or some other things. You know, I will always remain intensely proud of our nation and where we are. We are the good guy. Meanwhile, the so called moderate wing of the Democratic Party, they're getting heckled out of the room. Joe Biden got heckled at the Maryland Democratic Party gala. It's a battle that's never truly over. And we'll look, They're chanting genocide Joe again. Free Palestine, trans pride, radicals. Same flag. That's the flag. Well, I can't sugarcoat it. It's American flag versus that. These are indeed dark days. Let's remember. Why is he still speaking? It's just terrible for him, honestly, that his wife keeps trotting him out like this. He is not. He's not with us. Chuck Schumer was getting booed at the pride parade and it's going to happen all over. Get ready, Democrats. Get ready. You did this to yourselves. You did it. Hi, everybody. Oh, well, there is a Chuck Schumer looking. Hello, fellow. Hello, fellow gay kids. Chuck Schumer. Things are going poorly for him over in New York. No wonder. James Carville, he is saying it's time for Democrats to talk schism. Why? Well, because in the new Democratic Party, James Carville. James Carville will be thrown over the side of the boat just like everybody else. She has attacked interracial relationships in the American flag. Lady, I ain't in the same party as you. I'm sorry, I just not. And I actually do think it's time for Democrats to talk the s word schism. I really do. And everybody is always said, no, no, we're coalition. We're a big tent. And there's some, there's just some shit that I can't be in the same tent with. The idea that we must neglect everything else that's going on. All of these other Primaries, all the recruits. Jason has all huge, phenomenal successes we've had and declared that the party is now under the control of a democratic socialist of New York City is insane. It is insane. But you guys did it. You got. It was your decision. You did it. All right. Meanwhile, over in the Middle East. Speaking of, you shouldn't bow to the guy with the knife in the subway car. It seems as though there is a schism inside the administration. On the one hand, you have the wing of the administration led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that says, actually, if you want a Middle east that works, you need to cut Iran out of it. And then you have a part of the administration that says, if you want a Middle east that works, you need to surrender to Iran. Those are basically the two sides of the coin. So on the side that says that you have to cut Iran out, Secretary of State Rubio brokered a deal between the government of Lebanon and the government of Israel over the weekend. This happened on Friday, and it was excellent. It's a good deal because again, the government of Lebanon opposes Hezbollah, the government of Israel opposes Hezbollah. Secretary of State Rubio said, again, the goal is to expel Iranian influence in Iran because the Iranian terror group Hezbollah has been occupying the south of Lebanon for decades and trying to get itself elected to the parliament in Lebanon through whatever democratic means are still available, and then also basically arming up as a separate military force in Lebanon, aside from the actual military of Lebanon. And so the goal of this deal was to put Lebanon and Israel on the same side of the table and Hezbollah and Iran on the other side of the. Of the table. This is what Secretary of State Rubio was saying. This, of course, is intelligent. The people of Lebanon have suffered tremendously now for decades as a result of outside interference in their affairs of countries trying to use the country as a launchpad for attacks. And this is not what the people of Lebanon want, and that's not what they deserve. What they deserve to have is what they once had and of which there is recent history of. And that is a prosperous and peaceful country, a diverse country where people of different backgrounds were able to live and go coexist side by side, and in many ways was the envy of the region and of the world. Of course, Secretary of State is right about that. And then he says, listen, this is the beginning of the beginning, because again, the idea here is that Israel will gradually withdraw as the Lebanese army proves that it can stop Hezbollah. So here is Rubio. So, as I said today, as I told all the parties here today. It's the beginning of the beginning. There's a lot of work ahead, and we don't in any way underestimate the difficulty of the task ahead. But we understand the importance of it, how vital it is, and we are honored to have played a part in bringing this together. Okay, now he is right about that. The State Department put out a statement saying these two countries, Israel and Lebanon, are the inheritors of ancient civilizations that date back to the time of the Bible. For decades, these countries have been dragged into war by terrorist militias and proxies that have undermined Lebanon's sovereignty, launched senseless attacks on Israel, and explored casts across the entire Middle East. Okay, so this is the correct framework. Guess who opposes it? So there's a person named Sridha Parsi who runs something called the Quincy Institute. Again, Shrida Parsi is rhetorically an Iranian cutout. He just does the work of the Iranians in the United States. Saurabh Mari, who is a sort of Catholic integralist figure but has become quite pro Iran during this latest war. Same thing. Both of them very much angry at the Israel Lebanon framework, which of course cuts Iran out of Lebanon, which is a thousand miles away from Iran. Parsi says, quote, the U. S. Iran MOU and the Israeli Lebanese agreements are incompatible as I see them. If both are pursued, neither will be achieved. It appears the administration is working against itself. And Trump appears too disinterested in the details to recognize this. And Amari said, quote, the MOU and the new Lebanese deal are mutually contradictory. The two documents are doing, doing, tending. What they are doing tends in opposite directions. Amari and Parsi are both reportedly advising the vice President. That's the other wing of the administration. They're right, by the way. The Lebanese deal and the MoU are in contravention of one another because the MoU is a surrender deal to the Iranians and the Lebanese deal is, in fact a rebuke of the Iranians. Which side will President Trump take? Well, on Friday, it appeared that the Iranians were going to make up the president's mind for him because it turns out that the United States was not in control of the Strait of Hormuz, which we have not been in control of the Strait of Hormuz for a while, all yelling about it to the contrary. We may be trying to bribe the Iranians to open the Strait of Hormuz, but the Iranians decided on Thursday evening, Friday morning, they were going to strike a Singaporean flagged ship in the Strait of Hormuz, a Cargo ship CENTCOM then on Friday afternoon announced that they had delivered military strikes against some targets in Iran, against Iranian missile and drone storage locations and coastal radar sites. So why were those there in the first place? Well, it turns out that this entire ceasefire has been an amazing opportunity, an amazing opportunity for Iran to rebuild a lot of these sites. According to Fox's Jen Griffin, I asked a senior defense official why the US has had to go back and restrike these sites that have been hit multiple times since February 28th when the war began. I was told Iran has reconstituted its air defense and missile systems along the Strait of Hormuz since the US bombing campaign ended April 7th. That is why the US military is now having to restrike areas like Hesham island and. And Syric, which they'd struck in the past. There's a lot that's damaged, but they move things around. Yeah, well, I mean, that's what happens during ceasefires, which is why, typically speaking, you should not declare unilateral ceasefires with terrorist regimes. And I've told you my preference. If we don't want any part of this anymore, we should have bombed Kharga island, we should have bombed the South Paris gas field, and we should have left. And then if the Europeans and the Chinese and the Japanese want to open the strait, their problem, that's possibility number one. Two is you develop a military plan to force the strait open, which, again, I would assume there are people in the Pentagon who know how to do this, because that's literally their job. Or three, you go ever harder at the Iranian regime, and yes, you fund the Kurds, and yes, you get them gunned, and yes, you fund the Belush, the Pakistani militia that exists in the southeast of Iran, and you go after the regime. There are a bunch of possibilities on the table. It turns out the worst one of all is to simply cave to the Iranians out of fear that they're going to strike some oil targets in uae, Bahrain and Saudi, which, by the way, they tried to do over the weekend anyway. And the President put out a statement Saturday evening saying if Iran never learns, we'll be forced to complete the job. Well, spoiler alert, they're not going to do a lot of learning. The President said it's very possible they will never learn. There may come a point when we are no longer able to be reasonable and will be forced to militarily complete the job that we were very successfully started. If that happens, the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist. Well, if you're going to try to reestablish credible threat of use of force. Number one, you shouldn't make threats that you're not going to fulfill. You shouldn't bluff. And number two, you probably shouldn't walk back to the table after hitting a few camels in the ass, which appears to be the next move. According to Axios, the US And Iran agreed to stop attacking each other according to a senior US Official as the two sides plan to meet in Tuesday in Qatar's capital. All the wondrous Qataris another Iranian cutout. We decided to stop all the kinetic activity, a senior US Official told Axios. A second US Official told Axios both sides will stand out for now and vessels can move freely as technical talks are set to continue. Okay. Just telling you Iran hasn't learned anything. Iran is not going to disarm. Iran is not going to give up the Strait of Hormuz. That's just the way all of this goes. All righty. Sa.
Podcast: The Ben Shapiro Show
Episode: Ep. 2455 - The Left REJECTS The Flag, The Bible… And AOC?!
Date: June 29, 2026
Host: Ben Shapiro
This episode delves into the current state of American political culture, as Ben Shapiro critiques what he sees as the Left’s rejection of traditional American symbols and values—specifically the American flag, the Bible, and even progressive icons like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). Shapiro explores how left-wing opposition to Donald Trump has led to extreme counter-identification, discusses controversies over teaching the Bible in Texas public schools, highlights radical leftist figures’ ascendancy, and tracks the infighting now emerging within the Democratic party.
How Trump "poisons" symbols for the Left (04:00)
NBC News report: American flag as a “red flag” (07:00)
The flag as a nonpartisan symbol (09:30)
Historical centrality of Biblical values (14:30)
Texas requires Bible passages in K-12 curriculum (24:00)
Purpose and significance (29:30):
Identity, coalition, and symbolic opposition (36:30)
Radical Leftist politicians—Zoran Mamdani (39:00+)
Radicals versus mainstream progressives (50:00)
The revolution “eats its own”: Scott Wiener (58:00)
Extremism in Colorado: Congressional candidate Milat Kirosh (1:10:00)
The link between anti-Zionism and antisemitism (1:19:30)
Funding and institutionalization of the Left (1:25:00)
Big Tent, Big Risks (1:28:35)
James Carville: “Time for Democrats to talk schism” (1:33:30)
Trump foreign policy update (1:38:00)
Bombings and “ceasefire” (1:44:00)
On symbolic inversion:
“If President Trump hugs an American flag, the left will just by necessity, want to burn it.” — Ben Shapiro (05:10)
On civic literacy:
“You are just not a literate western citizen if you don’t know the Bible.” — Ben Shapiro (21:05)
On left-wing coalition values:
“If you are unfamiliar with the roots of the American flag, then you get to replace it with anything. If you stand for nothing, then you will stand for anything.” — Ben Shapiro (29:30)
On coalition politics’ self-destructive tendency:
“Any politician, right or left, who includes in their coalition psychos, the psycho will take over the coalition.” — Ben Shapiro (1:28:55)
On intra-Left conflict & the limits of appeasement:
“You can run away from Jewishness, but your Jewishness will not run away from you, as it turns out.” — Ben Shapiro (1:04:15)
This episode paints a picture of what Ben Shapiro considers a fracturing American left—one that, fighting the symbols and traditions of the country in the process of opposing Trump, is undergoing an internal struggle between its establishment and radical elements. With a combination of historical argument, cultural critique, news analysis, and biting sarcasm, Shapiro positions the defense of the American flag, the Bible, and national principles as crucial to reviving what he sees as the essence of “Americanism” amid deepening division.