A (15:07)
Awesome. Okay, so written in the 90s by two historians and demographers. Think like DC nerds who love history. They're just doing history research and writing books about history, American history. And they found a pattern which they later called the generational theory or generational cycle theory, popularized as the fourth turning. So to be clear, they didn't come up with a theory. They discovered it and then they, you know, found more details to support it. And same year as the sovereign individual came out. And I think stepping back now, it's. It's a theory of the world, It's a way to view the world. It's not, it doesn't map one to one. And it's an emergent bottom up thesis that says, huh, it seems like humans in civilization operate in this pattern. And if that's true, how can we use that to see the world? It pairs very nicely with a top down approach. Think a long term debt cycle popularized by Dalio. If you kind of mishmash those two together, I think you have a pretty good picture of the world. And the theory is, is based on the fact that generational cohorts are predictable and they follow a pattern. So we're millennials. We're born in a certain period of time. We were all forged by the environment on which we grew up. So things that would shape us is what's our childhood like? Primarily in the 90s. Okay. We're over parented. Were all snowflakes. 13th place ribbon dare program. Then we have 2001. Okay. We didn't really get to experience that as an adult. We have 911 stock market collapse, the worst in the Middle East. Then we have the global financial crisis, coming of age, entering the workforce, period. And then we have Covid. Right. So you add all that up. That's kind of how our group was forged. That's how we grew up. And when we leave the house and we, you know, leave our parents and we go out in the world, we start to bond together and that cements our identity as a cohort, as a generation. And then we become young adults and we progress through life and we have predictable responses to our environment because we are all, all forged the same way. And the generation after us has a different context in which they're born and they're raised differently. And so we can predict how they will impact the world as they get older. And the author found four different stages of life. So childhood, young adult, mid adult, elderhood. Each one has very defined roles in society which are obvious. It also follows a spring, summer, winter, fall pattern. And so that's what they discovered. And then they also found out that roughly 80 to 90 years is the full cycle. So there's four generational archetypes that repeat and repeat and Repeat. So think 80 to 90 years, which is roughly one human lifetime. That's important. And at the end of this cycle, we have this catastrophe, this crisis. And over the last like four or 500 years, it's always been a war. And every fourth turning has had a war. Every, every war has been in a fourth turning. Every total war. So they're highly correlated. Doesn't mean there has to be a war every, every 80, 90 years. But it means that we need conditions sufficient enough to mobilize the people in order to make dramatic changes. We. You probably know this in your personal life. It's hard to make a change. We wait till the last minute, you got to touch the stove before you realize, right? And as a society, we're the same way. So until the pain is upon us, we don't act. And so right now we're in the middle of a fourth turning period. We should expect more volatility. If you see the world through this lens, the cancel culture makes sense. The political division makes sense. The war drum beating makes sense. COVID lockdowns make sense. All this stuff makes sense. And so that's the end of the cycle is a wartime period. We reimagine the institutions you think politics, education, the geopolitical alignment, monetary systems, all that stuff changes. And it's almost as if over the last 80, 90 years, entropy has just decayed our systems. We created them in the 40s. Ish. And it suited the world at the time society changed. We corrupted those institutions. They're not what they once were. We look around and we say, oh, our institutions don't serve us. Collectively, we have this feeling of okay, it's time to fix our institutions. And it's so bad that we as a species are willing to make massive sacrifice in order to make a change. That's an important part. We're willing to do crazy stuff because the stakes are so high. Okay, Midway through the cycle is a religious movement. Also over the last 400 years, every 80 years, right at the midpoint of the cycle, we have have one of these. This would be the civil rights area era. This would be the, the Protestant Reformation. This would be the, the Quakers. And I think there's one more. I don't know my history that well back then. And so, yeah, that's interesting. That's our inner world. Okay. That's also a response to the kids that grew up prior. So let me give you the. The full cycle in as short as possible to give you an idea of how this looks. The previous fourth turning 1929 to 1945, starts with a stock market collapse. Then we have the Great Depression, FDR takes power, eventually World War II, and then we remake the entire world during the 30s. FDR's era, we were responding to this, this event, 1929, stock market collapse. And what did we do? We created all this crazy stuff that would have never been possible prior. FDIC worried about your bank. Don't worry, the Fed's got you lose your job. Don't worry, unemployment insurance has got you worried about retirement. Social Security, World bank, NATO, imf, Bretton Woods. All of this stuff was created in that period of time. If you rewind 10, 20 years, none of it would have been. None of it would have happened. But again, the pain is there, the stakes are high. We're willing to reset the game board and build our institutions anew. Then we go into the post war era, okay? And the post war era is defined by stability, Boring white picket fence, Woody Guthrie, you know, relative stability, relative equality. But the young people, as they do, they look around, they go, you guys are fucking nerds. What's so boring? This is so boring. Like, where's the sex, drugs and rock and roll? So like any good kid does, they push back on their parents? Right? That pins those two archetypes against each other, okay? And what does that do? The kids grow up, they push back, and they change the interior world and they create the psychedelic 60s, civil rights era, etc. Kids born in that period, they were under parented. Now you have the Gen X kids. So the boomers they raised, they under parented their kids. They were, they. They went from hippies to yuppies. They don't want responsibility, do as I say, not as I do, that type of thing. So then you have this under parented generation, Gen X. These are the bad boys. These are the latchkey kids. This is Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. And a lot of the Silicon Valley startup energy aligns with Gen Xers, okay? And that period of time is defined as the third turning. So second turning is that religious movement. Third turning is a period of deregulation and it's about individualism, okay? And that sows the seeds for future problems because as we deregulate, as we sort of take, take off the, the training wheels of society, it maintains its pace and its momentum for a while, but eventually those things catch up to us. And by deregulating all the banks, it sets the seeds for 2008, which is also the start of the fourth turning that we're in now. So that mirrors 1929. That transitions from third to fourth. And I'll tie one thing to politics. In the third turning, the politicians, they essentially minimize all the bad stuff. They're like, hey, the getting's good, just vote for me. It's a 90s baby. Bill Clinton, we're all good. And they would hide all the bad stuff. Then you have the fourth journey. What happens? Hope and change with Obama, Make America great again. Right? These are clearly just attacking how bad it is and how we need to change. So that's harnessing the mood shift from third to fourth. And I don't think that these politicians, maybe some of them read this, but it's an intuitive thing. You get feedback and you end up there. And so, yeah, now we're in the fourth turning again. I expect a total war or some sort of massive climax in the next five, ten years. Previous Fourth Turning was World War II, the Civil War, Revolutionary War, etc. And so that those are the periods we can look to for information or some parallels. And I think now we're very close to the climax. I did think Covid could have been the climax. And then all of a sudden it just tore us apart, made it even worse. So that's out. What we'd be looking for is a unification process, a process that says, I don't care what your day to day politics are. We got a band together to get through this really hard thing. Okay, that could be Ukraine, Russia. Nope. Could be Middle Eastern war. Probably not. That feels like proxy war. That feels like us doing bidding for other countries in the region that I don't need a name for keeping us on YouTube. It could be Taiwan and China. It could be something, it could be just the fiat sovereign debt bubble for all the governments blowing up at the same time. I don't know what it will be, but those are the things I have my eye on. And then after we have the climax, we sort of rebuild, we redo the institutions, think maybe transition to a bitcoin standard, maybe realign the geopolitics that we have in the world. We already saw the parties, the Dems and Republicans in the US totally realigned. And so we're starting to see, you know, if you squint a little bit, what the next chapter could be. And I expect us to enter that maybe 2030, maybe up to 2035. The theory does not predict things, but, but it does predict the mood. It predicts how the constellation of the archetypes, the hero, nomad, prophet, artist, right? How those archetypes are and what age they are, that predicts the mood. And so one final point here, otherwise I can run forever on this in, in the third turning, okay, that period of time would be like 80s to 2008, right in that window. Then if we had a reason to go to war, we had a catalyst, we just wouldn't go to war. We would look around and say, what's the point? The Gittin's good. Why would we take this big risk? There's no point. However, you have 08, you have Covid stuff, whatever. You have more impetus to go to war as things, the stakes are higher. Actually a better example is the Germans sank the Lusitania or whatever that ship's called in the early 1900s, which was a third turning event. What did we do? Yeah, whatever, don't worry about it. Okay, fast forward a little bit. Pearl harbor happens. Then what? The people the next day are like, yep, total war. I'm in. And the whole country mobilizes. So that kind of gives you similar catalysts, different outcomes. Because the mood is different, the constellation of those archetypes changes. And that's what we can use to predict our outcomes.