← Clock It with Symone & Eugene
Clock It with Symone & Eugene
The Aftermath
00:42:22
What happened and what’s next, after an unprecedented election catapulted Donald Trump to another stint in the White House.
Loading summary
Transcript74 lines
- [00:00]
USAA
The last thing you want to hear when you need your auto insurance most is a robot with countless irrelevant menu options. Which is why with USAA Auto insurance, you'll get great service that is easy and reliable, all at the touch of a button. Get a quote today. Restrictions apply.
- [00:14]
Michael Steele
Usaa.
- [00:16]
MSNBC Promo
Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts. New episodes of all your favorite MSNBC shows now ad free plus ad free listening to all of Rachel Maddow's original series, Ultra Bagman and Deja News. And all MSNBC original podcasts are available ad free and with bonus content including why is this Happening? Velshi Band Book Club and more. Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.
- [00:56]
Claire McCaskill
Hello and welcome to how to win 2024. We're recording this episode on Thursday, November 7th at about 10:30am Eastern Time. I'm Claire McCaskill and well, folks, we did not win in 2024. We got our ass kicked. It's not who we wanted, but it is the outcome that we have to live with. And obviously it's an outcome that we have to work hard towards changing in the future. Before we get into results and what it all means, I want to let you know that we're going to be winding down this podcast after this episode. A year ago, we set out to cover an unprecedented election and we've done that and then some. What a roller coaster it has been. So now it's time to hang it up. We might come back with updates here and there as news warrants, but for now, we're taking a beat to figure out what this moment calls for and the very best way to serve you, the most important people in this enterprise, our podcast listeners. And if there are any updates in the future, you will be the first to know. But now let's get to it. Today I'm here with three amazing special guests, superstars in their own right, MSNBC's own co hosts of the weekend, Simone Sanders Towson, Michael Steele and Alicia Menendez. Hey, everybody. Welcome.
- [02:05]
Alicia Menendez
Greetings, Claire.
- [02:06]
Michael Steele
Hi, Claire.
- [02:07]
Claire McCaskill
How tired are we?
- [02:08]
Alicia Menendez
We're tired.
- [02:09]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah, we're tired.
- [02:10]
Simone Sanders Townsend
I've just kept the IV of Tito's and other cocktails going, so I'm good.
- [02:16]
Claire McCaskill
You know, I gotta tell you the truth. I came home last night after work and I made my first drink and it was a very healthy dirty martini. Okay. That was about 7:30. I drank it and I went straight to bed.
- [02:31]
Simone Sanders Townsend
There you go.
- [02:31]
Alicia Menendez
I love that for you. Okay. No, I love that for you.
- [02:35]
Claire McCaskill
All right, we need to start with a caveat. That what we're talking about is as of this morning. But frankly, I think we know kind of what's going to happen here. I've looked at the data. It's pretty clear we're going to lose the House. Also, we don't know yet what the margin will be in the Senate. And that matters. It matters whether they have 52 because we've got a couple of senators that are independent minded. We still have Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, who I have watched personally stand up to their caucus time and time again. So if we win the rest of them, that's great. If they get to 55, then it gets really dicey in terms of our ability. And we don't know what they're going to do about the filibuster, which could be a whole podcast. If they blow up the filibuster, then all bets are off. So let's talk through the results, the warning signs, the surprises. Let's start with you, Michael. What surprised you?
- [03:22]
Simone Sanders Townsend
I think what surprised me, to be just brutally frank about it, was just a significant majority of the American people, having given no prior indication, very much aligned themselves with Trump and Trumpism. Not that they are doing a full embrace of it, but at least from the standpoint of addressing their grievances and their concerns, they felt that what Trump offered was a better vehicle than what Kamala Harris was offering. The hope and aspirational messaging fell flat with a significant majority of Americans to the point where for the first time since 2004, 20 years, you have a presidential nominee winning both the popular vote and the Electoral college vote. And likely we'll have a pretty nice margin. Now, Trump Underperformed from his 2020 numbers, but still beat Kamala Harris by what will roughly be somewhere between 2 and 5 million once we see how that settles out. So that surprised me because I did not think on the heels of everything else, and I'm not even getting into the polling and all of that, Claire. I'm just thinking just straight up how the American people viscerally responded to both of these campaigns, both of their messages and where they thought they needed the country to go. They clearly decided they wanted the country to move right and they wanted it to move right on immigration, they wanted it to move right on the economy. And so now that we're in this new space, it's going to be interesting to see how they react when Donald Trump starts implementing all that stuff that comes with having the country move to the far right.
- [05:06]
Claire McCaskill
So, Alicia, what did he tap into and were There warning signs we missed.
- [05:10]
Michael Steele
Yeah, I mean one of the things that surprised me most was the inroads that Republicans made in New Jersey. I'm a New Jerseyan in New York in places where you ordinarily have not seen Republicans be very competitive in the way that they were in this election. But to your point, I think the warning signs were there. I was at the Jersey Shore this summer and there were Trump flags everywhere. My kids mixed income school, largely Latino in Hudson County, New Jersey had a school wide election and the kids voted for Trump. So perhaps I should not have been so surprised. I think one I would just warn it is still very early and we are running up against as media folks the reality that there is the highest interest in this story at the time when there is the least information. So I say that only to say that I want the opportunity to revise and extend as we learn more. But to me, one of the things, one of the warning signs that was there and something he tapped into was just anti incumbency. And that's not something that is unique to the United States. We're seeing that globally. We saw it with Sunak who lost votes in the uk we saw it with Macron who lost votes in France. We saw it with Modi who lost votes in India. There were losses in Japan, Belgium, Bulgaria, Lithuania for the governing party. So that's undergirding all of this. There was absolute fury with the economy, which again, like I've been in the field over the last four years and you would stand in parking lots outside of grocery stores. And one of the things that I noticed as a working mom is that folks weren't coming out with a full, what my mom would call a shop for the week. They were coming out with one rotisserie chicken, they were coming out with one pack of eggs. That people simply were not able to afford their groceries for the week in one shop at the grocery store. And that was the tell. And that doesn't mean that the economy so when you look at the macro picture wasn't incredible. It just means that people were saying I can't afford the basic things that I want and need from a family. I think housing, which doesn't often come up, but I think is one of the fundamentals of the economy was huge because it is a question about safety and security. If I as a parent cannot keep a roof over my children's head, do I feel that I can keep them safe and secure? And then I think he tapped into immigration, which I see this question slightly different. We can we can talk a little bit about immigration, but people want to see an orderly border. They do. And so I think he extrapolated that out to become xenophobic and anti immigrant in ways that I don't think serve us as a country. But I think you put it all together, the anti incumbency, the economic fury, what he was selling folks around immigration and it becomes a pretty potent force.
- [07:54]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Claire, can I just ask a quick question and get your thoughts on this too? Not to flip the script here, but at least you raised a couple of things that I think for me also they kind of eat at me because to the extent that the price of eggs and the price of gas matter, to the extent that people want an orderly border, what struck me is how did the country look past the xenophobia, the racism, the misogyny to say that those things mattered more? Character of the messenger and the message seemingly had no sway. I could get up and call the former speaker of the House the B word or effectively want to do that. I can simulate craziness with a microphone, I can behave in the most disgusting manner and yet I'm going to bring your egg prices down. And that. That's enough.
- [08:44]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah. Here's the thing. I think there is some truth to the fact that people always want change in election and there's certainly the economic reality that folks can't afford to retire, they can't afford to send their kids to college, they can't afford to take a vacation has been a problem in America for a while now. We lost the Democratic Party, lost those voters, the working class voters, because we kept promising change and nothing was getting better for them. So they began Barack Obama. One of the reasons he was so popular, first he was amazing, but second was because there was a sense he would be a disruptor. He was something very different. We had never done anything like Barack Obama in this country before. And so I think there was a sense he was going to be different. And when it turned out not to be that different, I think we lost some of our luster. And here's the thing. What we saw as disqualifying, what we saw as, you can't elect this guy, he has no integrity, wouldn't know the truth if it slapped him up the face with a two by four, doesn't have the morals of an alley cat, doesn't respect the rule of law, calls people names, he's the kind of person we don't want our children to be like to us. That was a disqualifier to most of America. It meant he was a real disruptor. It meant he was going to give the middle finger to the system in a way, nobody has given the middle finger to the system. And the only reason he didn't get it all done last time was because he surrounded himself with swamp people. And secondly, because of the pandemic. So in their minds, they rationalized, now he's going to have the right people around him and he's going to really F up all these elites. And the bottom line, Michael, is the Democratic Party has to come to grips with this. We are now the party of the elites. And it's really hard for me to say that. I almost choke on it, because I was brought up with the belief that what my party was all about was looking out for other people, looking out for the underdog, looking out for the little guy, looking out for the guy who took a shower after work, not before work. But we've lost those people and we are now the college educated elites. And we've got to figure out how we show him to be the fraud he is in the next few years. And that's a tall order.
- [10:51]
Simone Sanders Townsend
That is actually a particularly important, I think, powerful message and image to come to grips with because on the Republican side now, we've become the party of the working man and woman. Even though our back pocket is lined with billionaires and future oligarchs waiting at the trough of Donald Trump and his administration to create the first trillionaire. And even though most people think that they actually got as much as the billionaires got in the last round of tax cuts, they still hold on to this idea that the Republican Party, Donald Trump, maga, more specifically, it's going to be better for them financially than the Democrats. So that, that really goes to the heart of your point, I think.
- [11:37]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah. We were trying to have Simone Sanders Townsend join us, but we've got some technical difficulties. We may have her in the podcast for an answer or two, but we had really difficulty getting hooked up with her. So, Alicia, you want to tackle for us what's going on in the Latino community. I hate to pigeonhole you in any way. I know that's not nice for me to do.
- [11:57]
Michael Steele
No, no, no, no, no. I'm, I'm, I'm very happy to talk about this, and I would love to talk about it, because I do think that to my point about us having to wait a little bit, I think going off of exit polling data is not the gold standard. And so I do want us to wait. But there was a shift there's no denying that there was a shift, and that shift was particularly pronounced among Latino men. But I also want to remind us, a majority of Latinos did vote for Kamala Harris. A large majority of Latinas, women like me, voted for Kamala Harris. But you know, my husband, this is what he does. He's been doing focus groups and polling for months. And the thing that they kept finding was that the economic issues were largely crowding out other concerns among this demographic. And that when you would ask folks about some of the ugly things that he had said about our communities, the demeaning things that he had said, what he was saying about immigration, that folks largely fell into one of three buckets. Either they had not heard it because they are not consuming the same media that three of us are consuming. They had heard it and simply did not believe it. Their argument was, he is a businessman, he knows the fundamentals of the economy. We can debate that later. And he would not deport 11 million people because he understands that that's not economically viable. Or they simply are voting on other concerns. You know, there are a lot of Latinos like myself, who are multi generational, who are us born, who immigration simply wasn't one of their top concerns. And so I think this is part of the bigger conversation that the Democratic Party is going to have to have in terms of a reckoning around non college educated working class and men. Those are all of their weak spots. And Latinos fall distinctly into that group.
- [13:38]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah. And I think part of the problem of the Democratic Party is we've looked at our coalition. Each part of our coalition is monolithic. And it is not. It is not. I don't care what anybody said on the Harris campaign. The trans ads hurt. They hurt.
- [13:53]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Oh, the trans ads were killer.
- [13:56]
Claire McCaskill
They hurt. Now, does that make me sad? Yes. Does that change how I feel about what our government should and shouldn't be doing in people's personal lives, about how they identify and who they love, it doesn't change my opinion about that. But to act like it is not a political issue that we've got to deal with is not very smart. And I saw it. I remember the gay marriage debate. And Michael, I mean, you know, I remember how I had to really work hard in the black community because there was a huge amount of really calcified opposition, especially among pastors, about gay marriage and whether or not it was something that they could ever acknowledge in terms of the way they saw their biblical commands. And it was. It was really tough. So I. I think we've got to quit looking at the Latino community. Oh, they're ours. The black community. Oh, it's ours. Oh, women, they are ours. I mean, we lost white women again. I'm pretty sure 52%. So I think we've got to really quit looking at it that way and maybe look at these issues as the driving force rather than, okay, do we have the black vote, do we have the Latino vote, do we have the women vote, do we have the union vote, do we have the gay vote? Instead, look at these issues top down, like economics and like securing the border. And quit trying to differentiate our message based on which part of the coalition we're talking to.
- [15:23]
Simone Sanders Townsend
I think it's also going to be interesting in terms of looking at the coalition. One of the aspects of this that I think the Democrats woefully missed or misunderstood was what was happening on the streets, the creation of the bro culture within the Republican ecosystem where they knew, okay, we have a problem with women because of where we are on abortion, where we are on a host of other issues. But we know that as Democrats have leaned into women, they have largely alienated men. And so that opened up a pathway. And one of the interesting ways in which that group got was through digital media. They wound up being on their cell phones and in their digital space 24,7 to the point where over the last year or so, the campaign and the RNC hired over 2,000 influencers, digital influencers, to go out and preach this new gospel. That's how that culture was created so quickly and cemented so, so firmly was it was something that happened over time that was not paid a lot of attention to. And so in this new space where this new cathedral has been built, this bro culture, the Democrats have got to figure out how they disrupt that.
- [16:48]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah.
- [16:49]
Simone Sanders Townsend
And how they kind of get into that space in a new way.
- [16:51]
Claire McCaskill
Yep, you're right. Let's pause here. When we're back, more from Michael and Leisha and their colleague and cohort Simone Sanders Townsend will also join us. We're going to talk about why we're here, what Trump 2.0 looks like in practice. Back in a moment.
- [17:11]
MSNBC Promo
MSNBC presents Main Justice. Each week on their podcast, veteran lawyers Andrew Weissman and Mary McCord break down the latest developments inside the Trump administration's Department of Justice.
- [17:23]
Michael Steele
The administration doesn't necessarily want to be questioned on any of its policy. I think what we are seeing is.
- [17:30]
MSNBC Promo
Project 2025 in action. This is it coming to fruition. Main Justice. Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts for ad free listening and bonus content.
- [17:42]
USAA
This week on Meet the press. As President Trump focuses on his global agenda and questions grow about Elon Musk's role in reshaping the federal government. Kristen Welker sits down with National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and Senator Andy Kim only on Meet THE Press. Listen to the full episode now, wherever you get your podcast.
- [18:02]
MSNBC Promo
The first 100 days, bills are passed, executive orders are signed and presidencies are defined. And for Donald Trump's first 100 days, Rachel Maddow is on MSNBC five nights a week.
- [18:15]
Claire McCaskill
Now is the time. So we're gonna do it, providing her.
- [18:17]
MSNBC Promo
Unique insight and analysis during this critical time.
- [18:20]
Claire McCaskill
How do we strategically align ourselves to this moment of information, this moment of transition in our country?
- [18:26]
MSNBC Promo
The Rachel Matt Maddo show, weeknights at 9:00pm Eastern on MSNBC.
- [18:36]
Claire McCaskill
Welcome back. Alicia Menendez, Michael Steele and Simone Sanders Townsend, co hosts of MSNBC's the Weekend, are all still with me for this postmortem election episode. And it's not a funeral, folks. We're going to try to smile, we're going to try to get perspective here. We've talked about what has happened. Now we're going to look at what it means going forward. What will the new Trump administration mean to the things we care about, especially over the next two years before there is another midterm election. So, Simone, let's start with you. What's keeping you up at night? What are you most worried about?
- [19:09]
Alicia Menendez
Well, I mean, I'm worried about a lot of things. I'm definitely worried about the deportations because I do think that that is something that Stephen Miller and his ilk have been very, very focused on, you know, while in their last couple of months when they were in the White House and then obviously throughout this entire time. But immediately, I'm actually most concerned about the transition process because the Trump campaign has not signed their and the Trump transition team up until, as we have this conversation, they haven't signed their transition. Like mous, if you will, with the federal government. And the Trump folks. And people who are on his transition effort had noted that they are considering using an outside entity, a private entity, to vet people for clearances. And to me, that's concerning because the way that it usually works under transition is the federal government has a particular office with the help of these lawyers that work for transition, that sign up and they do the vetting, they run the background checks, they do the interviews depending on and this is for people who are, you know, being potential cabinet secretaries, but also people who work in the executive office of the president on the staff for the president, all the staff for the vice president. Right. They have to be vetted. And he, you know, they vet the people because there are some things that make you vulnerable to manipulation by, you know, foreign government. And they look at all these things, and I think now he's going to get all. Let all these people get clearances that should not have one.
- [20:41]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah. So I think he's going to not sign an MOU with the government. I think he's going to give the middle finger to the traditional process. I think he's going to do it exactly how he wants to do it. I don't think he's going to require FBI clearance checks. I think he's going to do all that. And you know what? His voters are going to love it. They are going to absolutely eat it up on a stick because they're going to say, this is exactly what we need to do. That's the deep state trying to put their finger on him. And he doesn't need the deep state. All he needs is the team around him, and he's going to save us. So I think he's definitely going to do that. I don't think there's any question. And yes. Is it scary? Absolutely, it's scary, but it's going to be politically gold for him. So what about you, Alicia? What, what are you keeping watch on? What are you most worried about?
- [21:26]
Michael Steele
I'm going to pick up on what Simone said about deportations, because I think there's been some confusion about whether or not this is actually popular among the American people. I think it's a question of how you ask it specifically. I think there's a lot of frustration about what is happening at the US Mexico border. I think there is a sense, largely based around misinformation, that not only are people coming in who don't have legitimate asylum claims, but that they are being given resources that previous migrants and immigrants were not given. I hear a lot about these thousand dollars checks that don't actually exist, but people are convinced that people are being given. And I think even the people who support deportations, they imagine that it is recent arrivals. That's not just what Donald Trump and Stephen Miller are talking about. They are talking about deporting people who have lived here, sometimes the majority of their lives, people who have small businesses here, people who are deeply ingrained in, in the fabric of this country. And I am concerned for those people, and I'm not just concerned by the implementation of that Policy by the likes of Stephen Miller. I'm also, I gotta tell you, Claire, I am nervous about the response I am even seeing from those on the left about sort of this anger around Latinos who broke for Trump and some sense that Latinos generally now deserve whatever they get. And I mean, my X mentions right now are filled with people being like, well, I hope when they deport your ass that then you all understand what it is you voted for. And I just want to caution people who are angry and frustrated and have every reason to be angry and frustrated that that ain't it. We need each other more than we have ever needed each other before. We need community, we need to be caring for our neighbor. And those who are most vulnerable among us are going to be among the first impacted.
- [23:10]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah, I've seen that too. And it worries me. I've seen it with black women lashing out against white women on social media and obviously I get it, you know, 90, I think what 92% of black women voted for Kamala Harris. But it's gonna be really damaging if the folks who voted for Kamala Harris start fighting with each other based on what part of the coalition they might represent.
- [23:33]
Michael Steele
Can I just say before I ping it over, as a fellow white woman who identifies as both Latina and white, I hold space for the fact that I am not the most impacted here and I can't imagine how angry black Americans are in this moment. And I'm a US citizen and I'm straigh and I'm over my baby making years. So like, there's a lot of things that are gonna happen that are not gonna impact you and me directly, Claire. So I wanna do both things right. I wanna hold space for that anger and frustration and just say to especially among those of us who have the privilege of feeling semi safe in this country, that work falls to us.
- [24:07]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah, I agree.
- [24:08]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Yeah, the permission structure has been given for all of that at this point. So everything that's been said is going to happen. And the recriminations are real and expected and will be fueled and encouraged. I've seen both of what has been mentioned in terms of an enormous backlash against the Hispanic community and the black community especially. One person actually texted me and said, you know, effectively, when they start hauling their asses down to Texas to deport, please no one call my number because there's no help for them. And so that is actually what Trump's America will look like where we are less and less concerned about each other. It is more and more an entrenchment of my camp against your camp, my tribe against your tribe. And what I'm looking at and what I'm really scared for is that back end, the setup, the, you know, transition, all those pieces are going to be important. But then the implementation of public policy and the fueling of further discord around the country as those policies are implemented, because they will be implemented with a narrative, with an accompanying narrative that says, this side is right, your side is wrong. This is the way to do it. That's not the way we're going to do it. And I think we're going to be looking at a more fractured America, which again, makes it more difficult not just for the Democratic Party, which is going to have a whole, you know, room full of issues to address that have nothing to do with public policy. They got to figure out how they are going to form themselves going forward, but also more broadly, those of us in the democracy space, what is the conversation we're now going to have in the country? What's going to happen with the Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney's and the Joe Walshes and folks like that who are on an absolute island. Absolute island with, I mean, literally, folks, I'm talking about the island that is probably about 10 miles across and that's it in any direction. You got no room to move. And all those folks. So it's going to be narrowing, Claire. Everything is going to get narrowed and funneled through this new vision, this new lens of America. And to your point, I think a lot of our fellow citizens are going to lap it up. They're going to love it and they're going to love it up to the point that it impacts them.
- [26:38]
Claire McCaskill
So let's talk about Elon Musk and let's speak to what he says he's going to do. You know, I came into the Senate as a former auditor, so I spent a lot of time looking at payrolls without a purpose and where there was waste and, you know, proud of some of the work I did over at the Pentagon on government contracting, saved billions and billions of dollars by reforming contracting over there. I know how hard it is to get at doing what Elon Musk has cavalierly said, that he's going to cut two thirds of the government immediately. How did they make good on that promise? And what I can't figure out is how the leadership. Remember the first time Trump was president, he didn't build a wall, Right? And he had the House and the Senate for two years. He had the House and the Senate, the People who blocked the wall were Republicans. You know, you've got gonna have different leaders now. You don't have Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell. You've got Mike Johnson, who's a big Trumper, and you've got who knows who at this point in the Senate. How's this all going to play out? Them thinking they're going to take a hatchet to the federal government? And is that the moment where people figure out that a lot of the things like how about all the money the farmers get, how are they going to feel about not getting half their income from the federal government anymore? So, Michael, how does this work? Elon Musk cutting two thirds of the government like he cut the employees at Twitter. How you think that's going to work out for him in the reality of the appropriations process, government funding and government programs that many Americans don't realize are part of the steep state.
- [28:08]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Yeah. So let's just be very clear. Elon Musk knows jack about the federal government. He knows jack about running the federal government. You cannot run the federal government like a business. Donald Trump has already proved that in his first term. This idea that you're just going to come in and slash a third or two thirds of any program or any department, that you're going to just outright eliminate the Department of Education or the Department of Health or the Department of whatever, fill in the blank, it's just, it is more deep state stupid speak that is not based on the reality. Look, I'm a small government conservative. I really believe in the limited role of the federal government in our daily lives. But I also have to recognize, because it's true and real, that the federal government provides a essential services to a lot of Americans who are right now applauding, cutting off their own damn check. I mean, you've got to realize that when you have people sitting there talking about they're going to cut them, fire all these people and downsize these agencies and stop this and stop that, that there's a ripple effect that you cannot unripple. And so Elon Musk so cavalierly as a billionaire, right, who makes, you know, $100 million in a day from his government contracts and interests, you know, sitting there talking about downsizing this and cutting that and we're going to go and take a, take a knife to these programs, is an idiot and he's dangerous.
- [29:39]
Claire McCaskill
I just think, let's take one practical example. You cut the Department of Education out, it's over. Okay? So right now, that department pays for school lunches and school buses. And programming for kids that are learning disabled. So all that money goes away. And who's going to feel that? Local school boards, local school districts. And who are they going to scream to? They're going to scream to their congressman and their senator. And what's that congressman and senator are going to do? Well, you know, it's the deep state. You know, you guys are on your own. Find the money for the school buses, find the money for school lunches. That's where the disconnect is here. And Trump is not going to want to do this, because Trump wants to give everybody everything.
- [30:17]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Right.
- [30:17]
Claire McCaskill
He didn't care about debt. He didn't care about deficit. He doesn't care. He wants to give out.
- [30:22]
Simone Sanders Townsend
He wants his name on the check.
- [30:24]
Claire McCaskill
He wants his name on the check. He wants to make sure nobody's getting taxed on anything. So you're going to have these two people collide. And I think Elon Musk cutting the government is going to be a little bit like building the wall in Mexico is going to pay for it.
- [30:37]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Yeah. It's just not going to happen. And to your point about education, even if, as Republicans argue, they want to do block grants to the states. Yeah. Can we talk about how block grants oftentimes works? Because when the state gets that, oh, let's say $700 million or a billion dollars, depending on the size of the state, they're going to be very interested in putting some of those dollars into other things other than, oh, yeah, I'm going to send this down to a local county government or local county school board. That's not how this is going to work. And so the impact on education, on health, on transportation, on agriculture, on all of these agencies and departments, that, yes, they're not an entrenched part of our bureaucracy, some of that fat can be peeled away. Claire, you know all too well as a U.S. senator where that fat is and how that can be cleaved. But you also know where the bone is. And when you get down to the bone, that's when people really start to feel it. And that's your point. And I think Elon doesn't have an understanding of that because he's never had to worry about the bone of other people.
- [31:46]
Claire McCaskill
Alicia, you want to take a spin around foreign policy and what this is going to mean and how this is going to impact the military and our allies around the world.
- [31:55]
Michael Steele
Yeah. But before I take that spin that you're offering me, let me also say that my other concern as it relates to everything that Michael just said and where it ties into Elon Musk is that I do think part of what we've realized is that our news and information ecosystem simply is not working and reaching enough people. So when Michael talks about all of those repercussions of not really understanding how the federal government works or understanding, but having irreverence for it, I am afraid that the message of why that is happening, why your kid is not getting their school lunch, why the cost of goods is going up, is going to be misrepresented to a lot of Americans. And that Donald Trump, as he has done before, will point the finger at Democrats and say, well, they're not letting me do everything that I want to do. That's why it was happening. So I do think that as it relates to everything that we have witnessed, we need to reimagine news and information in a way that actually reaches folks where they are as it relates to foreign policy. I think part of what has been interesting just in the past few days is watching world leaders know just who Donald Trump is and whether that is Viktor Orban, who Donald Trump has at various points lauded and pointed to as a model for what he would like to do in the United States, or whether that is Zelensky, who understands the critical role that Donald Trump and a Republican Congress is going to play in deciding how much longer he has the resources to continue his fight against autocracy in Ukraine. And so I think a lot of world leaders woke up understanding that the consequences of this election are deep. My 7 year old said to me, does everyone know that Donald Trump won? And I said, yes, Mama, I think everybody knows. And she said, well, you know, just like people in the United States know, but people globally don't know. And I said, no, no, baby, like the United States is the big sister. She's a big sister. So they're the big sister of the world. And so what they do, everybody else looks to and they study and it makes them think about how they act themselves. And so they watched with great curiosity because it's going to mean tremendous things for them. And whether you're talking about Russia or China or NATO, it's, it's all right there.
- [34:03]
Claire McCaskill
Okay. After the break, Michael and Lisha are going to stick around to sort out some other things we see on the horizon with Donald Trump in the Oval Office. Stay with us.
- [34:18]
MSNBC Promo
MSNBC presents Main Justice. Each week on their podcast, veteran lawyers Andrew Weissman and Mary McCord break down the latest developments inside the Trump administration's Department of Justice.
- [34:30]
Michael Steele
The administration doesn't necessarily want to be questioned on any of its policy. I think what we are seeing is.
- [34:37]
MSNBC Promo
Project 2025 in action. This is it coming to fruition. Main justice subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts for ad, free listening and bonus content. Get the all new CNBC Sport newsletter. Alex Sherman brings you exclusive interviews Ambassador the biggest news impacting the world of sports, business and media all straight to your inbox. Sign up for free@cnbc.com sportnewsletter this week.
- [35:04]
USAA
On Meet the Press, as President Trump focuses on his global agenda and questions grow about Elon Musk's role in reshaping the federal government. Kristen Welker sits down with national Security Adviser Mike Waltz and Senator Andy Kim only on Meet the Press. Listen to the full episode now. Wherever you get your podcasts.
- [35:28]
Claire McCaskill
Welcome back. Alicia Menendez and Michael Steele, co hosts of MSNBC's the Weeknd, are still with me for this final episode of how to win 2024. So as we close out the episode and frankly, this era, let's look at what's next. Michael, go.
- [35:43]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Yeah, look, I think this dynamic and you know, at one point, you know, Claire and I have been hanging out over the last week here at MSNBC and at various times talking and we've been paired up quite a bit. And I just looked at you, I didn't say anything to you, Claire. I just looked at we were at the table one night and I just looked at you and I said, this woman needs to be in the U.S. senate. But then I wouldn't want to wish that on you in this environment because it won't be fun. And the reason I say this, because the country's going to need voices like yours. You and I will spar over policy all day long, but at the end of the day, I know your heart is in the right place and I know your efforts will be on behalf of the people that you represent. And I know you know that about me in my public role. What we have now emerging in the Senate is a MAGA Senate which takeover will be complete, and a MAGA House aligned with a MAGA president. And so where that places Democrats is in a very difficult governing position. Yes, they may be in the minority in both chambers, not clear just yet whether the House is secured by Republicans, but let's say it is. It will be very difficult for the Democrats to work with a group of political politicians who are not interested in anything other than what Donald Trump wants and so objectively trying to negotiate, which will have to happen on the nation's debt and finances, when legislation is going to be leveled up to strip out Obamacare and health care, when the national ban on abortion comes forward, there will be no one willing to listen to the arguments that will be made by Democrats. And that is going to be a very cruel reality for the country. It's going to be a very cruel reality I think, for Democrats because as we've noted privately and I think we can state publicly, the Republicans who would have been in the House to serve in that role are no longer there, for example. So it's going to be very, very difficult space. I think at least in the first year things will turn a little bit as you get closer to the congressional cycle of 26. But right now it is going to be full steam ahead MAGA agenda, get as much done as they can in the first hundred days, set the table for the back end financial discussions as you get to the end of the budget year. But I think it's going to be very, very hard for the Democratic Party legislatively and from a governing position to effectively help steer the country because there won't be any room on the wheel to do that.
- [38:26]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah, you know, I, I kind of hope that in some ways, you know, part of me thinks it'll be better if they take the House as long as we stay disciplined and messaging and make sure they understand that they have the power now to do everything they said they were going to do. And if they don't do it, I don't think he was ever held accountable for all the things he promised the first time and didn't deliver the first two years when he had the House and the Senate. So Alicia, what do you think in terms of the post mortem is the message here? Don't stray from the base. I'm hearing a little bit from the left that Harris tried too hard to reach the middle and lost Palestinian supporters and lost by campaigning with the Cheney's. She lost some of the left. Then there's others saying, you know, the biggest issue was she wasn't willing to put more distance between her and Biden and that was the big problem. What do you think the biggest problem was?
- [39:19]
Michael Steele
I think the fundamentals were really hard here and I'm going to leave it to the politicos to do the analysis or perhaps to Michael Steele who's already done that type of postmortem and then had a party that chose not to follow any of the advice that he laid out. But Claire, I'm going to, I'm going to offer you something different. Because I think that your, your listeners are. If they are like me, then they're wondering what they can do. And so what I would say is, this is one. Get off your phone. The answer is not on your phone. And fighting with folks on social media is not the just crusade that it feels like in this heated and intense moment, care for each other. You're gonna have to find a way to get really curious about your neighbor and about people in your family and why it is that they feel the way they do about Donald Trump and by extension by about the Democratic Party. You know, we had Ian Bassin on deadline with Nicole and it was right after Jeff Bezos had decided not to endorse either candidate from his post at the Washington Post. And you had so many people who were so angry and they were pulling their subscriptions from the Washington Post. And I said, ian, I understand that anger, but like, is that the way. And he said, absolutely not. Like, if you, what you want to do is create an information rich society and a press that is able to hold power to account, then you need to be upping your subscription. You have the basic subscription. You go in there and you tell them you want puzzles and recipes too. Because journalists and truth tellers and storytellers have needed our support and our resources like never before. And so this is the moment where we all think, how do I support a thriving democracy, understanding the ways in which it currently under attack. And it's an important conversation. I don't mean to undermine it. I will let the partisans figure out the partisan piece. I will let the politicos figure out the politico piece. What can I as a citizen do in my little corner of the world to make sure we survive?
- [41:18]
Claire McCaskill
Yeah, and I listen. I'm so glad you did. One of the reasons we're here is that we have got calcified bubbles of affirmation, not information. And everyone is going for affirmation. Nobody wants the real information. So the only places you get straightforward information many times is local. You know, there's other news sources that I would certainly argue are. But it's harder to convince people of that right now. So if you have a small business take out an ad in your local paper, you know, give up a little money that you're advertising on Facebook and advertise in your local paper. I think this is really, really important. When I came to Washington in 2007, there were like 12 reporters assigned to Washington from Missouri newspapers. Today there are zero. Literally zero. So nobody in Missouri knew Josh Hawley had only come home, like, you know, three times a year for the last six years. I couldn't have ever gotten away with that.
- [42:13]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Right.
- [42:13]
Claire McCaskill
I mean, they would have been on me, like, you know, no tomorrow. So that local impact is so big. And if you've got, like, we've got a thing called the Independent Missouri, that's a local journalistic effort that depends on contributions. Find those organizations and give money to them. Maybe a little bit more to them this year than you do your favorite other charity that you give to at Christmas time.
- [42:34]
Michael Steele
They'll probably both, because everybody's gonna need it all right now.
- [42:38]
Claire McCaskill
You're right, you're right, you're right. All right, guys. I wanna thank you guys so much for being with me today for this last episode. I can't imagine people I would have liked to spend it with more than you all. And you guys, don't miss their shows. They're really good. All three of them are terrific. We had some issues with Simone's technical capability of joining us today. I want to get that in there. We didn't leave her out of this conversation. We had a lot of technical issues today. But it's been my honor and pleasure to have Michael Yu and Alicia here with us today for this last episode of how to Win. And I look forward to being at your table on weekends, on the weekend, in the near future.
- [43:16]
Simone Sanders Townsend
Oh, yeah. Thank you.
- [43:16]
Michael Steele
We're going to give you one weekend to take a nap, Claire. All right.
- [43:19]
Claire McCaskill
Thank you very much. Thank you very much. I'll take it. And a big thank you today to the listeners. Even though we may not have won the White House or the Senate or probably the House, the fight goes on. So find ways to hold on to hope and claim victory. Even in small moments, whether through service to your community or volunteering in a local election. There's a lot to fight for. And just because we didn't win this time doesn't mean that we've given up on our country and continue to hold the newest administration accountable. Try not to tune out. I know it's really tempting right now just to say hell with it. I mean, I feel that way. You know, I. I just want to go to a movie theater with a flask of bourbon. I want to. You know, I want to. I want to go someplace where I don't have to talk about this anymore. And give yourself some grace on that. Give yourself a week or two. But then you've got to get back in the fight. You've got to pay attention because we've got to hold these guys accountable. Ultimately, that's how we will take back the levers of power that matter to the values that we hold dear. So thank you for your time and your ears this past year. Please continue to join us online and on air for ongoing political coverage and keep your eyes peeled for what's next from MSNBC Podcasting. And of course, remember to subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts for ad free listening. Okay, and one last time. This show is produced by Vicki Vergelina. Let me stop there and say she's amazing and I'm really, I'm gonna get emotional here. I'm really, really happy to have worked with her on this effort. Jaimeris Perez it took me about six months to figure out how to say her name, but once I did, I realized what a jewel she is and I am so proud to have worked with her as our associate producer. Katie Lau like cow. That's what they say on my read. So I don't mess it up. I don't think I messed it up one time. Katie is our audio engineer and she's terrific. Our head of audio production is Bryson Barnes. Aisha Turner is the amazing executive producer for MSNBC Audio and has done a terrific job herding us and corralling us and making sure we get this across the finish line. And Rebecca Cutler is the senior Vice president with vision for content strategy at msnbc. Thanks for listening.
- [45:35]
MSNBC Promo
Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts new episodes of all your favorite MSNBC shows now ad free plus ad free listening to all of Rachel Maddow's original series, Ultra Bagman and Deja News. And all MSNBC original podcasts are available ad free and with bonus content including why is this Happening? Velshi Band Book Club and more. Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.