Adapting the Twists and Turns of ‘Conclave’

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Book Review – "Adapting the Twists and Turns of ‘Conclave’"

Podcast Information:

• Title: The Book Review
• Host/Author: Gilbert Cruz, Editor at The New York Times Book Review
• Episode Title: Adapting the Twists and Turns of ‘Conclave’
• Release Date: February 14, 2025
• Description: Host Gilbert Cruz engages with top authors and critics to discuss the week’s top books and their adaptations into films and television. In this episode, Cruz converses with Peter Straughan, an acclaimed screenwriter known for adapting complex literary works into compelling screenplays.

---

Introduction to the Episode

Gilbert Cruz opens the episode by highlighting his long-standing interest in the adaptation process, emphasizing how books and movies synergize to create some of the best cinematic experiences. He introduces Peter Straughan, a seasoned screenwriter with notable adaptations such as Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy (2011) and Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall trilogy, leading up to his latest project, Conclave.

Notable Quote:

“Books and movies have always worked hand in hand and some of the best films of all time have been based on best sellers or works of high literature.” – Gilbert Cruz [00:38]

---

Background on Conclave

Peter Straughan discusses his latest adaptation, Conclave, a political thriller set within the secluded environment of the Vatican during a papal election. Based on Robert Harris's novel, the story delves into the intense machinations and power struggles among cardinals vying to elect a new pope. The film has garnered significant acclaim, receiving eight Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Notable Quote:

“It's a political thriller. It's from a book by Robert Harris, who's excellent at exploring the world of politics, but it's set in the world of a papal election, the sort of secret, closed world of a conclave.” – Peter Straughan [02:47]

---

Approach to Adaptation

Cruz inquires about Straughan's methodology in adapting a substantial and intricate novel like Conclave. Straughan humorously describes his initial approach as instinctive, using a pen to make scribbles and assemble narrative pieces organically. He emphasizes the mosaic-like process of deconstructing and rebuilding the story to fit the cinematic format, often preserving entire scenes when dialogue is strong, even if some trimming is necessary.

Notable Quote:

“It's almost like mosaic work. You know, you have all of these pieces. Sometimes they're going to be laid out in a very similar order to the book, sometimes in a completely different order.” – Peter Straughan [03:26]

---

Unlocking the Conclave’s Core

The conversation shifts to a pivotal moment in Conclave: a heartfelt speech by the protagonist, Cardinal Lawrence (played by Ralph Fiennes). Straughan explains how this speech was instrumental in shaping the screenplay. Originally, Cardinal Lawrence delivers a carefully prepared homily but abandons it mid-delivery to speak from the heart, introducing themes of doubt and the dangers of absolute certainty. This moment resonated deeply with Straughan, leading him to further explore these themes within the narrative.

Notable Quotes:

“Certainty is the great enemy of unity. Certainty is the deadly enemy of tolerance.” – Cardinal Lawrence [05:47]

“Perhaps our faith is a living thing precisely because it walks hand in hand with doubt.” – Cardinal Lawrence [06:03]

---

Relevance to Contemporary Issues

Straughan reflects on how Conclave mirrors current societal tensions around polarization and the lack of middle ground. He articulates how the film operates on multiple levels: a timeless political tale, a spiritual exploration of faith and doubt, and a commentary on modern societal divisions. This layered storytelling ensures the adaptation remains relevant and resonant with contemporary audiences.

Notable Quote:

“It feels very like what was happening in the contemporary situation to do with the polarization, increased polarization, the lack of middle ground.” – Peter Straughan [07:26]

---

Personal Connection and Character Development

Drawing from his Catholic upbringing, Straughan delves into the construction of Cardinal Lawrence’s character. He articulates how his personal background provided him with an authentic understanding of the religious and emotional nuances required to portray Lawrence’s inner struggles and search for meaning. This personal connection enabled Straughan to infuse the screenplay with genuine empathy and depth.

Notable Quote:

“Lawrence as someone straining to make contact again with God, that didn't feel like an alien figure. And I had a degree of sympathy for that search.” – Peter Straughan [08:20]

---

Translating Inner Thoughts to Screen

Cruz addresses the challenge of externalizing a character’s inner monologue in a screenplay. Straughan explains his strategy of "bulletproofing" early drafts, where he includes detailed descriptions that can later be pared down or visually represented by the actor’s performance. This approach allows room for actors like Ralph Fiennes to bring their interpretations to life without being constrained by excessive script direction.

Notable Quote:

“I put up more scaffolding than you need, than you hope that you're actually going to need.” – Peter Straughan [10:04]

---

Cinematic and Visual Storytelling

The adaptation’s visual elements are a focal point of discussion. Straughan describes the Vatican’s portrayal as striking and theatrical, emphasizing rituals and pageantry inherent to the Catholic Church. He conceptualizes the film’s structure as a stage where public performances and private negotiations coexist, enhancing the narrative’s dramatic tension.

Notable Quote:

“There's the stage in which people are performing in the elections, in the homily, the mask to a certain extent, and then there's backstage or wings where the masks are off to some extent.” – Peter Straughan [14:22]

---

Pivotal Scenes and Character Dynamics

A critical scene in the convent’s cafeteria serves as a turning point, where tensions among the cardinals explode, showcasing the collapse of their controlled facades. Straughan highlights how this scene encapsulates the film’s exploration of hidden emotions and the fragility of orchestrated unity.

Notable Quote:

“There's a sense that nobody can hide anymore, that this is no longer a normal conclave. Everything's collapsing.” – Peter Straughan [16:11]

---

Incorporating Silent Characters with Impact

The episode touches on the strategic use of silent characters, such as Sister Agnes, portrayed by Isabella Rossellini. Straughan discusses how subtle moments, like a lone nun’s silent observation, can carry significant narrative weight without explicit dialogue, enhancing the film's depth and thematic resonance.

Notable Quote:

“It's so precise, the little change that crosses her face. And again, you just thank God. That's... You don't need lines. You don't need lines. It's all there to be read.” – Peter Straughan [17:59]

---

Balancing Fidelity and Creative Freedom

Straughan elaborates on the delicate balance between staying true to Robert Harris’s original work and introducing creative elements to enhance cinematic storytelling. He emphasizes the importance of gradually transitioning from the book's structure to a film-centric narrative, ensuring that the adaptation aligns with the medium's strengths without compromising the source material's essence.

Notable Quote:

“It's always just this balancing process. So there were times when we thought, okay, let's add a little bit of filler so, you know, There's a couple of scenes that we added that we just... To kind of build that kind of tension.” – Peter Straughan [18:47]

---

Adaptation Challenges: Linear vs. Complex Narratives

Comparing Conclave to his previous works like Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and Wolf Hall, Straughan discusses the varying challenges of adapting linear versus complex, character-dense narratives. While Conclave benefits from a straightforward storyline, his other projects required immense compression and character management to translate intricate plots into coherent screenplays.

Notable Quote:

“If it's something that's to do with human actions, then you can turn it into drama.” – Peter Straughan [22:51]

---

Future Aspirations and Desired Projects

Concluding the conversation, Straughan expresses his desire to adapt Hilary Mantel’s A Place of Greater Safety, a novel about the French Revolution. He conveys his deep appreciation for the book and his aspiration to bring its rich historical narrative to the screen.

Notable Quote:

“It's another book by Hilary Mantel which is called A Place of Greater Safety, about the French Revolution, which she wrote Before Will Fall. And I read long ago and loved, and I've loved it ever since and always wanted to do it.” – Peter Straughan [23:42]

---

Closing Remarks

Gilbert Cruz wraps up the episode by thanking Peter Straughan for his insights into the adaptation process, particularly regarding Conclave. Straughan reciprocates the gratitude, leaving listeners with a deep appreciation for the intricate work involved in transforming literary masterpieces into engaging films.

Notable Quote:

“Thank you so much for joining the book review podcast. Peter Straughan talking about Oscar nominated screenplay Conclave. Thank you so much for being here.” – Gilbert Cruz [24:07]

---

Conclusion: This episode of The Book Review provides a comprehensive exploration of the adaptation process through Peter Straughan’s experience with Conclave. Listeners gain valuable insights into balancing fidelity to the source material with creative cinematic storytelling, the importance of character development, and the challenges of translating complex narratives into engaging screenplays. Straughan’s reflections underscore the delicate artistry required to adapt literature effectively, making this episode a must-listen for fans of both books and films.

Transcript

[Polestar]

Polestar's first all electric SUV, Polestar 3 is now on the roads across the US and it's ready to make an impression. At first glance, the aerodynamic exterior creates a sleek technical look, but it really shines when you sit in the driver's seat. Go from 0 to 60 in as little as 4.8 seconds and get an EPA estimated range of up to 350 miles per charge. Book a test drive to discover all that Polestar 3 has to [e-mail].

[Gilbert Cruz]

Hello, I'm Gilbert Cruz, editor of the New York Times Book Review and this is the Book Review Podcast. Books and movies have always worked hand in hand and some of the best films of all time have been based on best sellers or works of high literature. I've personally always been interested in the process of adaptation and today we have the third in our series of conversations with directors and screenwriters behind this year's Oscar nominated films that started as books. And so today I'm here with Peter Straughan. Peter has become a pro at adapting works for the big and small screens. He co wrote the 2011 feature film adaptation of of Tinker, Tailor Soldier, Spy, There Is a Mole, the classic John Leray spy novel. He's Been There for Years, a screenplay that earned an Oscar nomination. Following that, he took the first two books in Hilary Mantel's Wolf hall trilogy, King Wants a Son, 18 Years of Marriage with no Heir, about Thomas Cromwell and Henry viii. Now he's decided some sin must have been committed to cause this curse and miraculously adapted them into a six episode TV series. And now his latest, Conclave, a thriller about the machinations at the Vatican. The Pope is Dead to elect a new Pope.

[Peter Straughan]

The Conclave Begins now, based on the.

[Gilbert Cruz]

Novel by Robert Harris and One and.

[Unknown]

A quarter Billion Souls Watching.

[Gilbert Cruz]

And it's received eight Oscar nominations, including ones for best Picture and best Adapted Screenplay. Peter, thank you for joining the Book Review podcast.

[Peter Straughan]

Thank you for having me, Gilbert.

[Gilbert Cruz]

So Peter, Conclave is a story that's set in the Vatican and it stars a cardinal, a bunch of cardinals, and essentially they're taking a bunch of votes. Some people might hear that and think that sounds really boring bureaucracy within the Catholic Church. Your film is not a boring film. I'm curious, how do you describe the movie to people who have yet to see.

[Peter Straughan]

Has been described as Mean Girls in the Vatican? My favorite description of it, it's a political thriller. It's from a book by Robert Harris, who's excellent at exploring the world of politics, but it's Set in the world of a papal election, the sort of secret, closed world of a conclave.

[Gilbert Cruz]

So obviously you're very experienced at this process, adapting big books. I'm curious, what is your process when you approach a book like this? Are you highlighting, are you dog earring? Are you ripping pages out? Like, how do you start to break apart a book like this so that you can have it in a form that is usable to you?

[Peter Straughan]

I have a pen.

[Gilbert Cruz]

Good start.

[Peter Straughan]

Usually it's a good start. Usually I have a pen and I make meaningless scribble marks next to it as if I have some kind of system, which in fact I don't. So some of them are sort of asterisks. A big star. In other words, I draw a line. And I don't really know what that difference is supposed to be. I have no idea. It's very instinctive. I think it's just a pass through. And if it's a line, I like a moment. I like sometimes a whole scene. And then it's almost like mosaic work. You know, you have all of these pieces. Sometimes they're going to be laid out in a very similar order to the book, sometimes in a completely different order. Sometimes you're going to deconstruct and rebuild completely. But yeah, the first thing is to assemble the pieces that you think you're going to use. Sometimes, you know, with all of these, with Robert and with Lucari and with Hilary Mantel, they're all really good dialogue writers, you can get a whole scene sometimes and you think, fantastic. I just need to maybe a little bit of trimming usually, you know, but the whole scene goes in.

[Gilbert Cruz]

Now, I have read that the thing that unlocked comple for you, correct me if I'm wrong, was a particular speech that the main character gives. In the book, he's called Cardinal Lamelli. He's Italian, and in the movie he's Cardinal Lawrence, he's British. And for those of you who have not seen Conclave, Cardinal Lawrence is played by the great Ralph Fiennes. He is the dean of the Vatican. He's the manager who's in charge of running this entire process to elect a new pope. At the beginning of all this, he has to give a homily to the assembled cardinals from around the world. And when you read this homily, this speech in Robert Harris's book, Peter, you said, okay, this is interesting. I think I can do something with this. So talk to me about how that speech sort of opened up the whole thing for you.

[Peter Straughan]

There were two moments, actually, there was a very small moment earlier in the book where Cardinal Tremblay, one of the characters, the previous Pope, has died. And he looks at his phone and says, oh, it's trending. The news is trending. And there was something about a cardinal saying, trending online that I thought, oh, that's. I mean, it made me laugh. And then, as you say, Lumelli gives homily about a third of the way into the book, something like that, in which he. He has prepared a careful vanilla homily which he abandons halfway through and surprises himself by instead saying, let me speak.

From the heart for a moment.

Give us appropriate doubts.

Certainty is the great enemy of unity. Certainty is the deadly enemy of tolerance.

And this, you know, this was. I started writing this quite a few years ago, and that felt very. This is very valid for the world that I found myself in. Even more so now.

Perhaps our faith is a living thing precisely because it walks hand in hand with doubt. If there was only certainty and no doubt, there would be no mystery and therefore no need for faith.

You know, the sense that we're becoming more and more polarized by our certainty that our side is right and the other side is wrong. So it seemed quietly subversive and radical in its own little way. So I. Yeah, it was then that I thought, I really want to do this.

[Gilbert Cruz]

It's interesting. Once a movie is put out into the world, the meaning it's no longer controlled by the director or the actors or you, the screenwriter. So conclave comes out. It comes out in a moment when the themes of, I guess, conservatism versus progress feel very relevant. You have this character who, for lack of a better phrase, wants to return the church to the past. He wants to make the church great again. And then you have someone who is the complete opposite of that. So you start writing this long ago, and you find it being released now into this world in which we are living. How do you manage to see that work that you put on the page and understand that it will, by necessity, be received in whatever way it will be received?

[Peter Straughan]

I mean, I think I was always aware that the film was operating on three levels. The book narrative operated on three levels, one of which was a kind of more universal tale of politics and elections, the corrupting power of power, those that are drawn to power, who should we elect? You know? And that feels like a timeless tale. There was a level in which this was about spirituality and about believers. I'm not a believer, but I was broader Catholic, so it was a world I was and I wanted to make sure that I was able to see the narrative through Lawrence's eyes, through a believer's eyes, because that was a different realm to be in. So there was that level, and then there was one that did feel, and I think intentionally saw by Robert Harris that did feel very relevant to what was happening in the contemporary situation to do with the polarization, increased polarization, the lack of middle ground.

[Gilbert Cruz]

As you just said, you were raised Catholic. I'd love for you to talk a little bit about how that allowed you to sort of flesh out the central character's belief system.

[Peter Straughan]

I do think it helped enormously that I came from a Catholic background. I'm not uncritical of the Catholic Church, obviously, but it also, for me, is my mother. You know, there's a nostalgia for it. I went to a Catholic school. I was an altar boy. It's my childhood, to some extent. So it's a world I was very comfortable with. And to some extent, that meant that I didn't feel too reverential either. You know, I'd known priests and canons, some of them flawed, some of them impressive. And then, you know, having been brought up a believer and now no longer being a believer, my family were. I think religion was important to my family. My brother, at one point was considering a Christian monastic life. In the end, he became a Buddhist monk. But that sense of searching for meaning through religion feels like home territory to me. In a way. It hasn't been my path, but it does feel like home territory. So in that sense, Lawrence as someone straining to make contact again with God, that didn't feel like an alien figure. And I had a degree of sympathy for that search.

[Gilbert Cruz]

You know, in the book, Lamelli, who, again, is Cardinal Lawrence in the film, is someone whose inner thoughts we have access to on a regular basis. And when you're writing a screenplay, of course, you have to externalize it in some way. So how do you do that with the understanding that someone like Ralph Fiennes, very talented Ralph Fiennes, is also going to bring his own interpretation to whatever you put on the page.

[Peter Straughan]

I think you bulletproof it early on in the drafts, which is you probably over. You put up more scaffolding than you need, than you hope that you're actually going to need. So that probably means, in terms of description within the script, slightly overwrite the description of the look that's crossing the cardinal's face. You veer into purple prose. And then when you get someone like Rafe, then you can just cut all of that out. Because the Thing that maybe you thought was going to take a line. And you would always, obviously want to try and be as subtle as you can, but the thing that you thought might take a line, you realize you don't have to because you can do it with a look.

[Gilbert Cruz]

I was also thinking of this moment after Lawrence's homily, where I can't remember the exact specifics, but he talks to someone and he has a front on that person leaves. And then he rips the little thing off the top of his head and sort of wipes his nose in anger or frustration or exasperation. And you see that moment where this man, whose job it is to lead this process and appear competent at all times, is struggling a little bit.

[Peter Straughan]

And that was just one take where Rafe did that, because, you know, again, with the great actors, they're sort of just living freely the moment again and again on each take. And it's a little bit like I used to play in bands. And if you've been in a recording studio, you know, this sort of the mixing desk, if you set all the levels too high, you've got nowhere to go. If the levels are fairly, usually good sound mixer, they have the levels sort of low to middle, and then you can push things up when you want to, to give it shape. And that's kind of like performance. I remember with Tinker, Tailor, Soldier Spy, Gary Oldman, it's very quiet, very moderate all the way through.

Did Prieto come and see you before he left on that Hungarian mission?

And there's one moment towards the end when he loses his temper and he shouts to Colin Firth's character, he says, well, what are you, Bill?

Did Carl, I ever consider having you take over the circus?

I'm not his bloody office boy.

What are you then, Bill?

It's the only time he does it, but it's like a punch because he's been so controlled up till then. And there's that with Rafe's performance as well. It's so controlled. But when he does that, you see how much he's loathing being put in this position of having to be the investigator.

[Gilbert Cruz]

Let's take a little break. We'll be right back.

[Peter Straughan]

Foreign.

[Gilbert Cruz]

This podcast is supported by NetSuite.

[Unknown]

Okay, business leaders, are you here to play or are you playing to win? If you're in it to win, meet your next MVP Netsuite by Oracle. Netsuite is your full business management system in one convenient suite with Netsuite, you're running your accounting, your finance, your hr, your E Commerce, and more all from your online dashboard. Upgrade your playbook and make the switch to NetSuite, the number one cloud ERP. Get the CFO's guide to AI and machine learning at netsuite.com NYT netsuite.com NYT@T.

Mobile we'll give you four free 5G phones and four lines for only $25 per line per month with eligible trade ins. And no, it's not a contest, it's every day for a limited time, everyone's a winner on America's largest 5G network.

Minimum of 4 lines for $25 per line per month month with autopay discount using debit or bank account. $5 more per line without autopay. Up to $830 off each phone via 24 monthly bill credit plus taxes, fees and $10 device connection charge for well qualified customers. Contact us before canceling entire account to continue Bill credits or credit stop and balance on required finance agreement too. Bill credits end if you pay up devices early. CT mobile.com.

[Gilbert Cruz]

There is an inherent cinematic quality to so much of the story beats so much of what we see. The Vatican, incredibly striking location. You know, the cardinals are all wearing this ornate clothing. You have all this incredible pageantry. From the ceiling of the Pope's door after he dies to the way in which each ballot is pierced on a needle and then dragged along on this very long red thread. There are all these visuals. How much of that do you work to put in your screenplay, knowing in the end that it's a director's decision on what they're going to shoot?

[Peter Straughan]

I mean, your job is to see in your mind the first version of the film and to see it as clearly as you can and to try and get that on the page in order to let the director connect with it and then the director will take it from there. But the visuals in conclave, it was always going to be important I think, because you know, as you know yourself, there's a very theatrical element to the Catholic Church. It's one of the things the Catholic Church does really well, is ritual and spectacle and theater. And that felt like a core theme in a way, because there's the performative element to that. So I started to think about it as there's the stage in which people are performing in the elections, in the homily, the mask to a certain extent, and then there's backstage or wings where the masks are off to some extent, and the horse trading's going on or the negotiations are going on and people's true Selves are showing. And that felt like one of the many interesting tensions that's in the book and could be in the film. And I sort of. One way of thinking about the structure of the film was there's a wall between what's happening on stage, the public performance, and the private, secret wings area. And when that wall comes crumbling down, that's when everything has to change. And for me, that was around probably the canteen scene.

[Gilbert Cruz]

Yeah, that scene, which takes place in the cafeteria of this dormitory in which they're all staying, is the scene where you see all these cardinals just getting very loud in a way that maybe they haven't been for the entirety of this conflict. They're yelling at each other. Someone calls someone else a traitor.

[Peter Straughan]

Let each man examine his conscience as I have. I have no desire to create bitterness in this conclave. And I will be happy to stand down as Dean.

There's a sense that. That nobody can hide anymore, that this is no longer a normal conclave. Everything's collapsing.

[Gilbert Cruz]

It really is the moment when things turn in a major way. But the reason that that scene is enacted in the first place is because Sister Agnes, who's played by Isabella Rossellini, interrupts this conversation. She speaks for the first time in a real way, eminences the nuns that we have seen in the background putting the plates down, washing the dishes, doing all the scut work. She finally sort of inserts herself and makes herself known.

[Unknown]

Although we sisters are supposed to be.

[Peter Straughan]

Invisible, God has nevertheless given us eyes and ears.

[Gilbert Cruz]

And it really is one of the few, if not only times you see a woman speak in this movie. I was wondering if you could talk about that moment a little.

[Peter Straughan]

I think it's kind of like the Chekhov line about having a loaded rifle in the first act. You know, if you have a loaded rifle in the first act of your play, you better fire it in the third act. If you have a silent nun in the first act of your film, you better give her a speech in the daylight. You better let her fire again from the book. And again, you always knew that that was going to, you know, if we got it right, would carry a punch. What was lovely about Conclave was I learned a lot of lessons from the book. And it was to do with. It was to do with artistic restraint, I think, you know, that Robert had exercised and that we sort of inherited. So there was this silent chorus of nuns who we keep returning to and you see, doing everything for the cardinals. And just their silence starts to become a question, which in the end is what the film tries to answer the question of those silent women. But it's not even that big a speech. But, I mean, it helps that you've got Isabella doing it, you know, I think it does.

[Gilbert Cruz]

I think it does. It's probably, you know, seven sentences or something. I don't know.

[Peter Straughan]

Yeah, but she carries weight. There's a shot earlier on in the film of her. It's when Rafe's delivering his homily and she's outside of the room because, of course, the women are excluded. And it's when he talks about doubting, you just see her cock her head. And it's very, very. It's so precise, the little change that crosses her face. And again, you just thank God. That's. You know, you don't need lines. You don't need lines. It's all there to be read.

[Gilbert Cruz]

How do you know when to add something that's not in the book? There's a moment in conplay of that happens in the book. A character goes into a room that they are not supposed to go in, but the movie gives it an added layer of suspense. Will they get caught by another character? How do you even know to. I can do this. I can add something that does not exist in the text to begin with.

[Peter Straughan]

It's a gradual process of divorce, is the truth. You know, normally, because when you say yes to a book, hopefully it's because you love the book and you feel very respectful and loyal to the book. That's true with, you know, Wolf hall and with Conclave and with Tinker Taylor. And the first drafts tend to be quite faithful. And then. But bit by bit, you have to start to leave that behind completely and cross the bridge to the film until in the end, you don't even bother looking back at the book. You don't care about the book anymore. You only care about the film. What's worked? What does the film need? What's working for the film. So it's always this process of kind of leaving one for the other. And with Conclave, it was always about balancing these different tones. You know, sort of the political thriller with something that was a more serious exploration of faith and doubt. Thinking if we tip the dial too far one way, it's going to be dry. It won't be entertaining. If we go too far the other way, we end up with Scooby Doo in the Vatican. So it was always just this sort of balancing process. So there were times when we thought, okay, let's add a little bit of filler so, you know, There's a couple of scenes that we added that we just. To kind of build that kind of tension. There were other things that we decided to go the other way, you know, so it was. I've never worked on anything that felt like such miniature work where it was all very. We didn't do anything that big that wasn't in the book. But we did lots and lots of checking and adjusting and fine tuning.

[Gilbert Cruz]

You, on your other works had to sort of do the opposite. You know, Conclave is this very linear story. You know, Tinker Taylor and Wolf hall, or the Wolf hall books, the two books that you adapt into the series. They're both stuffed with characters. They both move around in time, and they really required immense compression on your part. Very different challenge than what you had to do on Conclave. How do you take something like Tinker Tailor, which some people read and still don't understand what happened until they read it a second time.

[Peter Straughan]

Me, too.

[Gilbert Cruz]

Or Wolf Holland, bring up the bodies, which just have all of the characters and get into manageable shape.

[Peter Straughan]

There's three books, by the way, for World 4. There's the Mirror and the Light, the third one, which we've also adapted.

[Gilbert Cruz]

So that's which will be coming out in the US in March.

[Peter Straughan]

Coming to a screen near you soon. It's interesting. I mean, I think if you saw someone rebuilding a building and you saw someone building a building, it looks like they're doing the same thing. I guess the difference is the rebuilders working with or against, but certainly in dialogue with an existing structure and a lot of the bricks have been supplied. So it kind of feels like that with, I mean, Wolf hall, which I loved, absolutely loved. I think Hilary Montella is, you know, one of the greatest British novelists, but it was a huge forest and there were lots of paths you could choose to go to go through it. Same with Tinker Taylor, really. So you find the story that speaks to you. And I've discovered, strangely, it's always the same story, which is a story of those who are loyal and those who betray. And I don't know why that's my story, but that seems to be the thing I'm responding to in other people's work again and again. So with Wolf Hall, I decided, and this is there in the book, but it's not all that was there in the book, but I decided that my narrative in Wolf hall was going to focus on a revenge drama. The Cromwell, one by one, takes revenge on those who betrayed his master, the Cardinal, and obviously Tinker. I Noticed that I was doing this really because of Tinker Taylor, because it's so explicit in Tinker Taylor. Of course, it's about the search for a traitor. But Conclave 2 is about those who are loyal to the wishes of the dead Pope and those who are betraying those who betray the Church, those who are loyal to the heart of the Church. And I don't know why I'm drawn to that story, but so that guides me. Everything that was helping to reinforce that spine, I would use. Things that weren't going to be of any use to that I didn't use.

[Gilbert Cruz]

It is interesting how loyalty and betrayal work hand in hand with politics and power and with these very secret worlds. You know, in all three of those projects, those are all sort of part of the scaffolding.

[Peter Straughan]

Absolutely. And I suppose they're working on a human. They're about sort of abstract concepts of power and politics, but on a very human scale where, you know, it's the individual personalities of these men that's going to decide the future of the Church. And Tinker Tailor the same. It's these sort of the upper echelons, and it's their. Their friendships, their love affairs, their betrayals that are. That are steering these, you know, larger events. So, I mean, and in a way, that's just obvious, isn't it? That's that. That means it's dramatizable. If it's. If it's something that's to do with human actions, then you can turn it into drama.

[Gilbert Cruz]

I'd love to end by asking you, don't jinx yourself, but they say put your desires out there into the world. What is a book that you would just love to take a crack at in terms of adaptation?

[Peter Straughan]

Well, I know what it is. I guess I can probably say the only reason I hesitate is because I want to try and persuade people to let me do it. But it's another book by Hilary Mantel which is called A Place of Greater Safety, about the French Revolution, which she wrote Before Will Fall. And I read long ago and loved, and I've loved it ever since and always wanted to do it. So I'd love to be given a chance to try to do that.

[Gilbert Cruz]

Well, good luck getting the rights to that book. Thank you so much for joining the book review podcast. Peter Straughn talking about Oscar nominated screenplay conclave. Thank you so much for being here.

[Peter Straughan]

Thank you so much.

[Gilbert Cruz]

This podcast is supported by Netsuite.

[Unknown]

Okay, business leaders. Are you here to play or are you playing to win? If you're in it to win meet your next MVP. NetSuite by Oracle NetSuite is your full business management system in one convenience suite. With NetSuite, you're running your accounting, your finance, your HR, your E commerce, and more, all from your online dashboard. Upgrade your playbook and make the switch to NetSuite, the number one cloud ERP. Get the CFO's guide to AI and machine learning at netsuite.com NYT netsuite.com NYT.