Transcript
A (0:00)
I'm sorry to tell you all, but Travis Kelce is not making a mockery of masculinity. But the Democrats certainly are. But more than that, what we actually should be focusing on is the growing epidemic of lonely women and their AI boyfriends. Okay, guys, so unless you have been living under a rock right now, there has been a lot of hubbub about Taylor Swift. And then in conjunction her boyfriend Travis Kelce, she announced that she is releasing a album. It is coming out on October 3rd, and if you want to know the significance of that, it's because it's 10. 3. 10 plus 3 equals 13. And that is Taylor Swift's favorite number. Of course, she had Easter eggs that she was hiding for, I think three years leading up to this album. But it's called the Life of a Showgirl, I believe is what it's called. And she made a whole splash because for the first time ever, she went on a podcast. Taylor Swift, the biggest songwriter, singer, artist in the entire world right now, has never been on a podcast, usually keeps a low profile. She doesn't do interviews. She doesn't need to do interviews, but she did go on her boyfriend and her boyfriend's brother, Travis. Kelsey, Jason, Kelsey, their podcast New Heights in the Heights. That's a musical brat. Oh my God, that's so ridiculous. That's the Lin Manuel Miranda musical. New Heights is their podcast. It actually was a very sweet interview. It humanized her in a really beautiful way. Like, she really does just seem like she's kind of this sweet, cringe, normal millennial who just loves writing songs. Anyway, I fully enjoyed it. It was very endearing. But that is not what I am here to talk about. We need to talk about Travis Kelce and masculinity and the fact that there are so many hills that conservatives could be and should be dying on right now. Big issues that we need to be addressing and focusing on. And Travis Kelce's latest cover for GQ magazine is not one of those hills. And I am going to tell you why. But before we dive into that, make sure that you are following our podcast page and please rate the show if you are enj. It helps us out so much in the algorithm. And if you want to stay up to date on future tour dates, new things that we're launching, make sure to check out BrettCooper.com we are actively building out that website to make it a great experience for you guys. So make sure to keep checking it out for updates. Also, guys, you might notice we have a pillow on the Set today. It's very exciting. And that is because I can't breathe unless I'm sitting in a very specific situation. That's where I'm at right now. So this is the new addition to the set. It probably won't be here after I give birth unless I just continue being very uncomfortable. But that's where we're at right now. I can't breathe. I'm sitting in a specific position. It's hot, but I have water. Don't worry. And we are going to talk about this because I have a bone to pick with people online. But also when do I not? All right, so if you missed it, Travis Kelce. At the same time the Taylor was releasing her album there being this power couple, he was on the COVID of GQ magazine talking about, you know, what his life is like, his regimen since losing the super bowl last year. Like, how is he recommitting himself to football? It was a really interesting article. I felt like it was very introspective. It was very self aware. He was very open about the fact that he feels like he was distracted. He was focusing on doing Pfizer ads and being an actor. But he is recommitting himself to, you know, the Chiefs, his team football. And he did a very interesting photo shoot. Max, let's go ahead and roll these photos here. Now here he is. He's been training the whole summer in Florida. So this is a very Florida man esque photo shoot. Here he is with some kind snake python, ripped jeans. He was styled by. Oh, my gosh. What is the guy's name? I'm blanking out. He is Zendaya's stylist. He's a really, really famous stylist. He does like a bunch of the Met Gala people. Here's another photo. Let's move on to this one. This one, he's literally holding an alligator in the Everglades with this insane hat on. But he's wrangling an alligator in waders. But all of these photos, they are very, very cool. Yes, they are weird. He had one where he was like emerging from the water in a construction. This one was also weird. Like for a while we had like strong man holding python and alligator. And then we have man in waiters holding oversized Hermes purse. So that one is kind of gay. I will admit that's a little weird, but for the most part I thought that these photos were pretty masculine. Yes, they are weird. But also, guys, it is high fashion. High fashion is always weird. Most of these magazine covers are very Very strange. And for the past few years, they have been even more emasculating and feminine and gay than this is. Like, I would much prefer to have Travis Kelce wrangling an alligator coming out of the water in a construction suit or cowboy hat, whatever he is doing. Then the insane stuff that we have seen for the last couple of years. And also, again, high fashion has always been weird. It has always been avant garde. And it has been that way long before woke came on the scene. Like, this is just normal. It is weird. Yes, I admit it might not be your cup of tea. That is fine. But this is not an attack on masculinity. It is not a mockery of masculinity and headlines like this. I'm sorry, you might laugh at who I'm pulling for this, but this is why we are seen as uncool. Travis Kelce's bizarre Florida photo shoot is a crime against masculinity. No, it is not. It is not. And then all the comments were people being like, ugh, I have the ick. He's like such a baby. He's like a feminine whatever. He's wrangling an alligator. What more do you want from him? He's like a huge NFL football player. Also, guys, at least he's not in a dress. Like, I know the bar is in hell. I admit that. I admit it. I am acknowledging it. But at least he is not wearing a dress like these. Like Pharrell. This is. And this is an equivalent here, Pharrell on the COVID of GQ magazine in a literal dress. And the article or the. This entire edition was about new masculinity. Like, we have improved from that. We also have this one from Vogue, Harry Styles, the infamous one. Literally, in a dress that I would wear. Also gq, we have Brad P. With strange eyeliner on. Like, this is what people think JD Vance is doing to his eyes every morning. Like his, you know, steel blue eyes with eyeliner. This is what they assume. But no, Brad Pitt was actually doing it. Laying in a bathtub of flowers with weird sort of painted fingernails and rings. Or this one is even weirder. When Kim K. Was named man of the Year by GQ magazine. Like, all of these magazines, they do weird stuff. This is not new. Woke did not do this to us. Travis Kelce is not mocking masculinity. I actually think that as weird as it is him wrangling pythons and alligators and emerging from the water in a construction outfit, I actually feel like that is about as Americana as a magazine. Like, GQ would go right now. So maybe let's just move on. Let's see it for what it is. It's high fashion. It's weird, but maybe we could even say, hey, that's pretty cool. At least he's not in a dress. Which, I know the bar is on the floor, but it's 2025, so what can you do now? Guys, speaking of masculinity, even though that was not an attack on masculinity, even though that was not mockery, we obviously do have a real crisis when it comes to masculinity. And both sides, in my opinion, need to rethink how we address this topic and more specifically, how we speak to men. Because both sides of the political aisle are making this so confusing and convoluting, and I think it is completely wrong. We're giving men mixed signals, treating them are stupid on both sides of the aisle, which obviously is not helping anyone. As Ground News pointed out in this article, masculinity stigma impacts men's mental health. Shocking. Isn't that crazy? Thank you, Ground News, for pointing that out. And thank you, Ground News, for sponsoring this episode. Now, I have spoken a lot about Ground News. We have talked a lot about government and media coverups like the Epstein files. Obviously, we were covering that a lot in the last couple of weeks, but that really is just the tip of the iceberg. It is more difficult than ever to know who to trust and where to look for information in news. And Ground News is one of the most powerful tools tackling this issue. Now, as you guys know, I'm super intentional about who I choose to partner with. I want to make sure that I actually use the products and that I love the people I'm working with. So when I talk about Ground News, it is for a reason, because I feel like this could be a great addition to your life. Unlike other platforms, Ground News does not push or suppress information to influence your perception. Their app and their website pull in the world's perspective on today's biggest issues so that you see what. What facts are being ignored and what biases are influencing both. Probably the clearest example of this is their blind spot feed that shows you exactly what stories the media and your algorithms might be suppressing in order to make sure that you truly stay informed. They wanna make sure that big tech is not deciding what you see. Now, I partnered with Ground News to get you full access to the truth for 40% off. That is $5 a month for the same vantage plan that I have been using when you go to groundnews.com Brett, or scan the QR code that is on the screen. This is how we all hold the media accountable. So go to ground news. Go scan that QR code. It'll be great. All right, back to this story. Obviously, when we talk about masculinity and the masculinity crisis and the messaging towards men, usually we are talking about the left, and the left really has not learned from their mistakes. We're actually gonna talk about that a little later. This is like a whole masculinity episode right now. But I fear that the right might also now be making some mistakes. And if they do not change course, if we do not learn from these mistakes, we are going to go down the same path. I mean, just look at this headline. This is from Tablet magazine. When did men become hysterics? Men used to fight wars and build things. Now they sob on podcasts and have meltdowns online. I'm sorry, and you're using Theo Vaughn as an example. Theo Vaughn, who has honestly, in just the past couple of years, become the voice of a generation in a way, like he is another Joe Rogan, but has a completely different tone and audience. Theo Vaughn is who people go to to be able to laugh and find humanity and common ground across political aisles, to expand their understanding, to listen to somebody who has overcome so much in his life, who talks so openly about drug use and substance abuse and sobriety and everything he's had to overcome, and he addresses it all with humor and grace. He humanizes even the most insane figures like Donald Trump and J.D. vance. He's able to speak to them like a normal human being. And you are putting him as your photo for this headline saying, men are hysterical. All they do is sob online. Now, the context for this article that I saw is that Theo Vaughan, just two days ago, interviewed a doctor who spent two weeks working in Gaza, and he had an emotional response to the content of this interview and the stories that this man was telling him. Understandably, it was an incredibly, incredibly heavy interview, if you guys watched it. And this then prompted the article in which the author says, these days, X is just a bunch of grown men having a string of histrionic outbursts, projecting the sort of, oh, gosh, I can't even pronounce this lading. I should have read this out loud before I did. I know what this word means. I cannot pronounce it to save my life. So sorry, guys. Emotion that at an earlier age would have called for fetching of the smelling salt and Loosening of the corset. So they are basically calling Theo a woman, calling these men on X females hystericals from the Victorian age whose corsets need to be loosened. If you question the facts underneath their feelings, you are challenging the entire premise of the only thing they have to offer on that platform, which more often than not means that you are also challenging the way that they make money. I'm sorry, author of this article. How are you any better? You're sitting behind a screen writing an article, getting emotional about Theo's emotions. You are getting emotional, I would even say maybe even hysterical, about an emotional response that a man had to an interview that he conducted on his own platform, on a huge, huge platform that is incredibly influential in our current media landscape. Now, first of all, I wanna say men crying at work because somebody criticizes them or because somebody is mean to them and being overly emotional or crying on TikTok, whatever it is, that's one thing that I think is a bit much. That's too far. That's like victimizing yourself. That could be a little pathetic. But men who are brought to tears or become visibly emotional and are comfortable with that because they feel empathy or heartbreak or sympathy for other people's experiences, as in Theo's case, it's is a totally different story. Theo Vaughan is not somebody who shies away from his emotions. He is not somebody who shies away from hard conversations that stir feelings inside of him. Like, if you've ever listened to his podcast, you would know that he's not sitting around just being a pansy, being hysterical, needing his corset to be loosened again. Go listen to the interview. It was a very, very intense conversation. And more importantly, when I actually got into the article and realized who was writing it and the biases of the publication, I realized that the only reason this piece was actually written is because Theo disagrees with the author's take on the Israel Gaza conflict and because he disagrees because Theo was brought to tears because of these stories, because he disagrees with the author. Theo is then a hysterical man that should be shamed. I mean, make it make sense. This is completely ridiculous. What this is is political manipulation, and the author simply is not being honest. You're not actually upset that Theo Vaughn is emotional, is brought to tears. You are upset about what brought him to tears. So write that article. Don't publish something that is attacking men for being stirred emotionally because of stories that they are hearing like, nothing is wrong with, you know, this author writing an article and disagreeing with Theo or His guests. That's totally fine. We have free speech, we have freedom of expression. You are allowed to disagree completely. But to shame him for showing emotions is such a loser mood. Like, imagine being a man on social media and just scrolling on Instagram, scrolling on X like I was. I don't follow this publication. I have literally never heard of it before yesterday. But I was just scrolling on my Instagram feed and Instagram. The algorithm serves me, this article. And imagine being a man not knowing the biases of this publication, why the author is writing it, not knowing anything about what the article actually contains. Just seeing the headline and seeing that after years of the media telling you to show your emotions and not be. Be toxic. And it's brave when men cry. Literally the media screaming at you for years about this. But then you see an article where one of the most famous and influential men right now is being shamed for that very thing. Like, no wonder men are confused. No wonder men are pissed off and fed up, because nothing makes sense. And now people on the right are contributing to that. It's like, we need to change course. So many men have come over to the right because of what they experienced on the left, because they were tired of being told that they were toxic, that everything they did was wrong. And now because one of these men, or some of these men might disagree with a political opinion, now they're hysterical. Now they're too emotional and they need to go back to being toxic. They need to go back to being stoic and calm and keep their emotions in check. It's completely dishonest. It is completely ridiculous. This is only going to hurt men more. And all of this is just such a simple minded outlook. Just like it is so simple minded for the left to think that all they need to do to win men back over to their side is to drop F bombs. This literally is the state of our culture right now. You have articles being written like this, like what we just talked about with the Yvonne. And you have the Democrats deciding that all they really need to do to win back men is to curse a little. Okay, guys, so let's just. Let's dive into that. So I saw this tweet going around which inspired this segment. And I thought, like, no way this is real. Like, this is just absurd. But in fact it is. So this guy, quote, tweeted a video, which I will show you in a second, but his quote tweet read, just remember that the New York Times published an article on Democrat strategy where they concluded that they had to be quote, Tougher and, quote, more authentic and, quote, use more profanity. This is fake and staged. He is dropping the F word for the same reason as Hunter Biden did a lot recently. So what he is referring to here, the he that is dropping the F bomb, that is Beto o' Rourke in a recent event. So take a listen to this video. If you have children around, plug their ears, because this man is about to be so authentic and so gritty and win back. All of you young gentlemen back over to the Democrats. Okay, here we go.
