Iran outmaneuvers Trump; cuts deal that leaves U.S. worse off than pre-war

Summary

Podcast Summary: The Briefing with Jen Psaki

Episode Title: Iran Outmaneuvers Trump; Cuts Deal That Leaves U.S. Worse Off Than Pre-War
Date: April 8, 2026
Host: Jen Psaki (MS NOW)
Guests:

• Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ)
• Governor Wes Moore (D-MD)
• David Remnick (Editor, The New Yorker)

---

Overview

This episode centers on the ongoing crisis between the United States and Iran, triggered by President Trump's threats of annihilating Iran’s civilization following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Psaki dissects the president's alarming rhetoric, the bizarre two-week ceasefire deal brokered by Pakistan, and the emerging domestic and global repercussions. The show features in-depth conversations with Senator Mark Kelly and Governor Wes Moore, both with military backgrounds, as well as New Yorker editor David Remnick, to analyze how the conflict has unfolded, its devastating consequences, and the unprecedented bipartisan calls for Trump’s removal via the 25th Amendment.

---

Key Discussion Points

1. Trump's Escalating Threats and the "Two Weeks" Delay Tactic

Timestamps: 00:30–03:19

• Jen Psaki opens by emphasizing the dread felt across the nation as Trump threatened what she calls a “genocidal attack” on Iran’s 93 million people if the Strait of Hormuz wasn’t reopened by his deadline.
• Trump’s pattern of repeatedly extending deadlines—always by “two weeks”—is lampooned, illustrating his habit of using this timeframe as a means to defer action or accountability.

Psaki: “It’s always two weeks. Always two weeks.” (03:19)

• Trump’s latest post suspends the attack for two weeks, supposedly contingent on Iran reopening the Strait, but Iran’s media asserts that the U.S. has agreed to broad Iranian terms—including continued control of the Strait.

2. What the "Ceasefire" Means

Timestamps: 03:19–04:00

• Iran claims “safe passage” will only be possible via coordination with their armed forces—a drastic change from decades of open passage.
• Iran’s Supreme National Security Council touts that the U.S. committed to “continued Iranian control” and more, though the U.S. side has not confirmed these details.

3. Damages Incurred: U.S. Standing, Economy, and Military

Timestamps: 04:00–07:24

• U.S. gas prices have hit a multi-year high ($4.14/gallon), alliances are in shambles, and America’s moral authority on war crimes is damaged.
• The Iranian regime, previously facing mass protest, is now able to rally patriotic demonstrations in response to U.S. threats.

4. MAGA Fractures: Right-Wing Influencers Rebel

Timestamps: 07:24–08:00

• Influential MAGA voices including Alex Jones, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and even Tucker Carlson are calling for the 25th Amendment to be invoked to remove Trump—an extraordinary rupture within Trump’s own base.

Tucker Carlson quote played by Psaki:
“If you work in the White House or in the US Military, now it’s time to say no, absolutely not, and say it directly to the president... Figure out the codes on the football yourself.” (07:24)

---

Interview: Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ)

Timestamps: 08:56–18:43

Trump's Leadership and the Broken Status Quo

• Kelly expresses “relief” that mass strikes are postponed, but blasts Trump for lacking strategy, shifting goals, and threatening genocide (“not a serious person... doesn’t listen to people around him.”) (08:56)
• The new Iranian role in the Strait is a “massive change... one of the most expensive toll booths for the Iranians and lucrative for them. That’s not the way this should end.” (10:41)
• The so-called negotiating tactic? Kelly flatly rejects it:

Sen. Kelly: “I don’t think he thinks far enough ahead to figure out what is a negotiating tactic or is. Whatever just happens to fly out of his mouth in any moment is what we are all stuck with.” (12:18)

Loss of U.S. Reputation and Global Standing

• Kelly highlights the loss of alliances, global reputation, and the haphazard, shifting rationale for the war: “Are we, you know, in a new, entirely different paradigm? So that’s what I’m worried about.” (13:04)

• The president’s contradictory justifications—regime change, nuclear weapons, “imminent threat”—leave the U.S. “in a much worse situation than we were in February.” (13:48)

Consensus Against Illegal Orders

• On MAGA figures echoing his prior calls for the military to refuse illegal orders, Kelly says:

“It’s not only the freedom of speech, it’s the freedom of the press as well... I’m not going to stand for it. And now it seems that Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene and others are realizing how unhinged this president is.” (15:58)

• 25th Amendment? Kelly is skeptical that Trump’s loyalist cabinet would act: “I find it hard to understand how they get out of bed every day without a spine… the chance of them actually doing this is, you know, it’s basically zero, little to none.” (17:39)

---

Interview: Governor Wes Moore (D-MD)

Timestamps: 28:44–35:50

Trump’s Fitness for Office and Impact on Governance

• Moore states bluntly:

“Donald Trump should not be the president of the United States... he is more selfish than selfless in the way that he approaches public service.” (28:44)

• He points to surging gas and food prices, blaming Trump’s “illegal tariffs” and tantrums.

Advice to Soldiers Under Unfit Leadership

• Moore sympathizes with troops deployed under Trump, lamenting they have been given “no clarity of mission and no clarity on the end game,” contrary to best military practice:

“We have a president who is... using it [the military] like a toy that should just be used in any way that the president sees fit.” (30:32)

Military and Media Manipulation

• Moore discusses coordinated attacks on his military and political reputation by the Sinclair-owned Baltimore Sun, labeling it “a canary in the coal mine” for right-wing media attacks meant to curry favor with Trump. (34:27)

---

Interview: David Remnick (The New Yorker)

Timestamps: 35:50–44:02

The Truth Behind Trump’s War Decision

• Remnick calls the entire Iran policy “a strategic disaster… If anything, it has the potential to speed up Iran’s desire to have a nuclear weapon, because now it, like North Korea, sees it as the one guarantee it won’t be attacked again.” (39:00)
• Trump is seen as ignoring his own advisors and giving undue credence to Israeli hawks, especially Netanyahu, who successfully lobbied him for military action.

The First Casualty Was the Truth

• Remnick elaborates:

“It’s an old saying by Aeschylus… the first thing that goes out the window when you commit war is the truth. This president never even pretended to make a case about this to the American people.” (43:09)

---

Notable Quotes & Moments

• Jen Psaki on two-week delay:
  “It’s always two weeks. Always two weeks.” (03:19)
• Tucker Carlson’s on-air rebellion:
  “Now it’s time to say no, absolutely not, and say it directly to the president... Figure out the codes on the football yourself.” (07:24)
• Sen. Mark Kelly, on Trump’s style:
  “Whatever just happens to fly out of his mouth in any moment is what we are all stuck with.” (12:18)
• Sen. Kelly on loss of alliances:
  “We had friends—or we had friends… Are they going to do that in the future here when we talk so aggressively about our allies?” (13:48)
• Gov. Wes Moore on Trump as C-in-C:
  “We have soldiers who are waiting for orders, but are still waiting for clarity of mission.” (30:32)
• David Remnick on U.S. global standing:
  “We’ve thrown out the window what was left of our global leadership.” (39:00)
  “Who talks like this? It used to be that a president’s dignity was called into question when he wore a tan suit to a press conference.” (40:46)
• Remnick quoting Aeschylus:
  “The first thing that goes out the window when you commit war is the truth.” (43:09)

---

Key Timestamps

• 00:30 – Psaki introduces Trump’s genocidal threat against Iran; “two-week” postponement tactic
• 03:19 – Analysis of the new “ceasefire” agreement
• 07:24 – Tucker Carlson urges military to refuse illegal orders
• 08:56–18:43 – Extended interview with Sen. Mark Kelly
• 28:44–35:50 – Interview with Gov. Wes Moore
• 39:00–44:02 – Interview with David Remnick on truth and the war’s origins

---

Summary

Throughout the episode, Jen Psaki and her guests provide a scathing critique of the Trump administration’s handling of the Iran crisis. They argue that the president’s erratic calculus, disregard for international law, and open contemplation of war crimes have both empowered Iran and thrown U.S. alliances into jeopardy. The “ceasefire” is seen less as a diplomatic progress and more as a defeat dressed up for domestic consumption—leaving the U.S. position in the region weaker than before. Perhaps most notably, opposition to Trump’s actions is now bipartisan, with former supporters calling for unprecedented constitutional intervention. The episode closes on the grim note that the first victim of Trump’s Iran war was the truth itself—a damage that will long outlast the present standoff.

Transcript

[Commercial Announcer]

A text says you're on my mind. A bouquet from 1-800-FLowers says, you're my everything. Heartfelt moments belong in the real world, not just your phone. For 50 years, 1-800-Flowers has helped millions of people make memories that'll last a lifetime with gifts they'll cherish forever. Their expertly curated arrangements and gift baskets shipped nationwide with a 100% satisfaction guarantee. Don't wait for the next big moment. Make it when you visit 1-800-flowers.com sxm today, that's 1-800-flowers. Com. Sxm.

[Host (Journalist)]

There's nothing like your first Mac. Here's what people online are sharing, Rhain says. Everything is just so smooth and fast. I still can't get over it. Syncing stuff between my phone and this is just chef's kiss. Rincredible488 says Apple Silicon basically cures low battery trauma. That's how they felt with their first Mac. How will you Introducing the all new MacBook Neo, an amazing Mac at a surprising price. Find out more on apple.com Mac we spent. I spent. I'm sure you spent the entire day wondering if the President of the United States was about to order a genocidal attack on a country of 93 million people. I mean, just sit with that for a moment. I know that he says all sorts of crazy things, but that is what he threatened this morning. This morning the President issued a threat to the entire population of Iran saying, quote, a whole civilization will die tonight to never to be brought back again if Iran did not meet his latest deadline to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by 8pm tonight. Now, most of the world treated a threat to wipe out an entire civilization with the horror and the disgust that something like that deserves. But we also saw efforts to play into the President's desperate theatrics, treating this whole thing like it was some sort of a primetime TV reality show. Fox Business Channel and at least one Israeli news outlet even had countdown clocks. You can see them on your screen right there, ticking away the seconds until the President's deadline for the indiscriminate mass murder he had threatened. Will or he won't? Will he or won't he? You know that was what they were asking all day. So those clocks were ticking away. Tune today to find out. We'll see what happens. Well, tonight, just an hour and a half before his self imposed deadline, Trump backed down and managed to justify a form of an off ramp for himself. In a post on his social media account, Trump said he had agreed to, quote, suspend the bombing and attack of Iran for a period of, you guessed it, two weeks. And in case you weren't familiar, two weeks has long been the President's absolute favorite timeline for putting off promises that he doesn't want to deliver on.

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

We're gonna be sending letters out in about a week and a half. Two weeks. I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks. Within two weeks. I could answer that question better in two weeks. I'll do this at some point over the next two weeks. I'll announce it over the next two weeks. I'll tell you about that. In a month from now or two weeks from now.

[Governor Wes Moore]

You crushed President Putin, I think, you

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

know, in about two weeks. You can ask that question in two weeks and we'll see. It'll be out in about less than two weeks. We're gonna start selling, hopefully in about two weeks.

[Host (Journalist)]

It's always two weeks. Always two weeks. Now, the two week ceasefire that Trump announced tonight was brokered by the Prime Minister of Pakistan, who says it applies to the entire region and is effective immediately. Trump says the deal is contingent on Iran agreeing to the, quote, complete, immediate and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz, though it does not seem that Iran is giving up control of the strait itself, a strait it did not control before Trump started this war. In fact, Iran's foreign minister made a point of saying that safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz will be possible via coordination with Iran's armed forces, which definitely does not sound like going back to the way things were just over a month ago. Now, in a separate statement quoted in Iranian media from Iran's Supreme National Security Council, they're also claiming that they forced, quote, America to accept its 10 point plan, in which, again, according to this statement from Iran's Supreme National Security Security Council, appearing in VARS media, the United States committed in principle to, quote, continued Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz, acceptance of enrichment, lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions, and payment of compensation. It's very hard to believe that the Trump administration would agree to any of that, even the Trump administration. But in any case, Trump seems to have put off for this moment, right while we are sitting here, the catastrophic strikes he's been promising. And it feels kind of like we've been here before, doesn't it? It's because we have. I mean, last month, Trump gave Iran 48 hours to open the Strait of Hormuz, threatening to obliterate the country's power plants if they didn't comply by March 23. But when that day arrived, Trump extended his deadline by five days, saying the U.S. would hold off until March 28. Then he extended that deadline by 10 days, setting it for April 6 at 8pm Eastern. Then this past Sunday, he inexplicably shifted it back by another 24 hours to April 7, which was the this evening. And now, of course, he's postponed that deadline by two weeks, which would push it back to April 21st. And look, if this tentative ceasefire, where I would note even the Iranians don't seem to be on the same page, and they certainly don't seem to be on the same page as the Trump administration in terms of the demands and what everybody's saying has or has not been agreed to. If it were actually a ceasefire with a verifiable step forward to ending this disastrous war of choice that Trump himself started, well, that would be a reasonably a relief to everyone. But right now, after all that bluster, after all that maximalist language and reprehensible threats of genocide, after all that, where does this leave us? I mean, gas prices are at their highest levels in years, with the national average now sitting at $4.14 a gallon, according to AAA. Trying to trump has destroyed America's already fractured relationship with our closest allies, threatening the future of the NATO alliance. America has lost any moral authority on the question of war crimes and whether we can expect other countries to adhere to the Geneva Conventions. As Trump ignores them, he's risked the prestige of America's military treating them like a bunch of toy soldiers. And today, the regime that was facing mass protests just a short few months ago mobilized hundreds of Iranians to take to the streets and form a human chain of around the power plants and bridges that the US had threatened to target. When the president was asked by NBC News about that, he said without a hint of irony that the demonstrations were, quote, totally illegal, adding they're not allowed to do that. So if you're keeping track, the president insists it's fair game to wipe out an entire country in violation of international law. But if Iranians gather on their bridges and around their power plants, he says that's illegal. Meanwhile, Trump's insane threats have become something of a last straw for many in the president's fraying MAGA coalition. Right wing influencers like Alex Jones, Candace Owens, Marjorie Taylor Greene are now calling on Trump's cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove Trump from office. And just listen to this familiar sounding edict from MAGA Influencer Tucker Carlson.

[Governor Wes Moore]

If you work in the White House or in the US Military, now it's time to say no, absolutely not, and say it directly to the president. No. Those people who are in direct contact with the president need to say no, I'll resign. I'll do whatever I can do legally to stop this, because this is insane. And if given the order, I'm not carrying it out. Figure out the codes on the football yourself.

[Host (Journalist)]

Sound familiar? Tucker Carlson is imploring members of the military not to carry out any illegal orders issued by Donald Trump. That's essentially the same advice that several Democratic lawmakers gave to members of the armed services last year. It's the advice that prompted Trump to accuse those Democrats of treason, target them for retribution. Trump's defense secretary even tried to demote Senator and retired Navy Captain Mark Kelly over his role in that message to service members. Now, after the president just walked the nation to the brink of carrying out a major war crime on his behalf, and I actually can't think of anyone better to talk to. Joining me now is Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona. He's of course, a member of the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services Committees. During his service as a Navy pilot, he flew 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm. Senator, I want to, I'm so grateful you're here with me. I know you've had a busy couple of weeks. I want to start by just getting your reaction to the truth Social post late today from President Trump about a two week ceasefire. How did you read that? Especially given some of what we've heard from the Iranians of what they say has been agreed to?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Well, I mean, we're still in the same spot I think we were in a couple weeks ago or even weeks before that. We have a president that has no strategic plan, no goal he was trying to achieve, or at least stay moving the goalpost over and over again. He's not a serious president. He doesn't think before he speaks. What he said this morning was incredibly disturbing. That he was going to end. A civilization, by the way, has been around for thousands of years. And in doing that, he was basically saying that he was going to commit unlawful acts, which I've been concerned about since November. So I am certainly somewhat relieved for now that there are not going to be massive strikes on civilian infrastructure in violation of the law. But we will have to see what happens next. I mean, he is not a, in my view, not a serious person. He doesn't listen to people around him. He doesn't get great advice when you consider who he put around him. And we're, we're at a really, you know, challenging, challenging point here. The Strait of Hormuz is still closed. And I don't see how this, any of this has helped the American people.

[Host (Journalist)]

I want to get to that and I just want to ask you one question about the Strait of Hormuz, because one of the things the Iran's foreign minister basically said, and I just read this, that safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz will be possible via coordination with Iran's armed forces. That is a massive caveat. How do you hear that? How should people understand that?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Well, on a massive change from what it had been for decades, which, you know, militaries, including ours and commercial ships had free passage through the strait. I've gone through there a number of times in 1989 and again in 1991, the second time for the first Gulf War, Desert Storm. But before that we had issues with the Iranians. But this is a entire change in what was a decades long status quo. And this could become for them one of the most expensive toll booths for the Iranians and lucrative, you know, for them. That's not the way this should end. This president has to get back to where we were before. I don't want to see our ships being charged $2 million every time they go through there. We're having to escort them to keep them safe. I mean, that is not a good outcome for this.

[Host (Journalist)]

Coordination through the Iran's armed forces, as they said, does not, is not going back to the status quo of just over a month ago, obviously, what had been for years. You mentioned, I talked about, I started the show, of course, talking about Trump's frightening, alarming, outrageous threat that he posed. This morning you just mentioned it. I wonder, you gave us a sense of what was going through your head when you saw that. One of the arguments that Trump's people have made is that this was a negotiating tactic. How do you read that? I think that's B.S. but what do you think?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Well, I don't think he thinks far enough ahead to figure out what is a negotiating tactic or is. And I think whatever just happens to fly out of his mouth in any moment is what we are all stuck with. And what this means is our reputation is further damaged and other countries look at this and they say, okay, is the United States of America lost its moral and, and ethical compass? Is this the same country who has led the free world for decades? Or are we, you know, in a new, entirely different paradigm? So that's what I'm worried about. You know, how do you fix this over the next several years or it's actually going to have to be fixed after his administration.

[Host (Journalist)]

Everyone obviously should want this war that Trump started to end. Of course, there's already, and you referenced this, a great deal of damage done. I mean, gas prices are high, we've alienated our allies, we've given up any and all moral authority around war crimes. I mean, before this even, but this kind of solidified it. And for what, I mean, to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which was open before this war started and currently not going back to the status quo, what do you want people to understand? I mean, cuz as many years as you spent in the military and as you've spent in the Senate, there's so much planning, typically for the day after, and what the impact is. What do you want people to understand about the damage that's already been done, even if this ends? And that's what we all should be rooting for?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Well, it's significant. It's also tied together with what he had said previously about invading Greenland, making Canada the 51st state. Now recently, more recently, Secretary Rubio talking about how NATO is not worth us being a partner anymore. We are the strongest country in the world, not only because of our economy and because of our military. I would say as important, important as those two things is the fact that we have friends or we had friends. We had countries that would come to our assistance like they did after 9, 11 when we were violently attacked by terrorists. All those countries, including Denmark, by the way, sent troops to fight by our side in Afghanistan. Are they going to do that in the future here when we talk so aggressively about our allies? You know, I think there's significant damage that has been done and it continues today because of this war in Iran that started with no explanation, not only to our allies but to the American people. The president didn't explain sufficiently why he was doing this. And then when he started to explain, he would change the explanation. And his, you know, you know, his cabinet wasn't even, weren't even on the same page. We get, we get told that we're in this because of a imminent threat in the future. I mean, how do those, how does, how do you square that circle? Or it's regime change, it's nuclear weapons, it's ballistic missiles. And now we're in a much worse situation than we were in February.

[Host (Journalist)]

I mentioned this earlier. I mean, even Tucker Carlson is now advising U.S. officials to say no to Trump if they're asked to carry out mass attacks on Iranian civilians. I'm sure I just put. But I'm sure you may have seen that. What do you make of the fact that there's now this growing coalition of people who agree on very little, all saying basically what you said last fall to say no to illegal orders?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Yeah, I mean, not only did I say it last fall, but in 2016, Pete Hegsett, the guy who's trying to demote me and take away some of my pension, said it in 2016 specifically about this president. I mean, he knew in 2016 who Donald Trump was. And there was a risk that Donald Trump could ask members of the military to do unconscionable things. So we realized that in November. I said something. The president didn't like it. He said I should be hanged, executed, prosecuted. They tried that. They tried to send us to jail. You know, that didn't work. You know, I'm fighting here on this issue on behalf of the constitutional rights of 2 million retired service members, you know, like myself, but really all of us to be able to say things and speak out about this government and not face retribution. And Jen, it's not only. It's not only. I mean, it's not only the freedom of speech, it's the freedom of the press as well. He's going after Americans constitutional rights that we've had for 250 years. I'm not going to stand for it. And now it seems that Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene and others are realizing how unhinged this president is. And now they're even speaking out.

[Host (Journalist)]

There is this growing group of, again, kind of unlikely bedfellows, as they say, calling for the 25th Amendment to be invoked. It is very unlikely. I should just tell people not to pour water. But because it would require the majority of cabinet and two thirds of. Or two thirds of Congress. But what do you make of that? Do you think we're at that point?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Well, I think it. With a normal administration, yeah, sure, we could be at that point. The problem here is the president's. When he was looking through people's resumes for cabinet positions, the number one quality, my sense is what he was looking for were people that were going to be loyal to him no matter what he put in a bunch of sycophants and a bunch of yes people that, you know, I think I find it hard to understand how they get out of bed every day without a spine. And I see this in the United States Senate as well. People that will not speak truth to power. So the chance of them actually doing this is, you know, it's basically zero, little to none. So I'm not holding my breath. What we have to do here is, you know, win the next election. Until then, we've got some levers of power we can use, you know, to try to keep this president in a box. One is the defense bill, but after that, November is coming up here pretty quickly.

[Host (Journalist)]

It certainly is. We need to take a very quick break, but stay right where you are. Thank you for being here with me through another block. I wanted to ask you about something. I want to play this for you. We'll talk about it after the break. But today, the former deputy commanding general in Kuwait told my colleague Nicole Wallace what he's heard. It was through secondhand sources about US Military leaders attempts to resist attacking the civilian targets in Iran and that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wants them to. I just want to play that for you. We'll talk about it after the break.

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

I have already indications that many targets that were recommended by the Secretary of defense were rejected by centcom, that they were civilian targets. I believe that people are already saying no to the, to the hierarchy. The CENTCOM commander is walking a very thin line where he is trying to do the best he can to implement military objectives as he understands them without getting fired.

[Host (Journalist)]

I can't wait to get your thoughts on that. We're taking a quick break. We'll be right back. You're more than just one thing. You're the boss. Hey, Google, what time is my meeting with Tim today?

[Commercial Announcer]

The athlete that class wrecks me the ringleader. And we're good and always their mom.

[Host (Journalist)]

Everyone in the all new Mazda CX5 more to move every side of you.

[Commercial Announcer]

Learn [e-mail] Google is a trademark of Google LLC. Sequences shortened and simulated. Know someone in your life celebrating a birthday. They deserve to feel truly celebrated. That's what 1-800-Flowers has helped people do for 50 years, turning everyday gestures into meaningful moments of connection. And this april, during their 50th birthday celebration event, when you buy one bouquet, get a second bouquet, 50% off. Celebrate more birthdays with our 50th birthday event all April long at 1-800-flowers.com sxm. Buy one bouquet, get a 2nd bouquet. 50% off at 1-800-flowers dot com sxm

[Governor Wes Moore]

this message is brought to you by Apple Card. Apple Card members can earn unlimited daily cash back on everyday purchases wherever they shop. This means you could be earning daily cash on just about anything Like a slice of pizza from your local pizza place or a latte from the corner coffee shop. Apply for Apple card in the wallet app to see your credit limit offer in minutes. Subject to credit approval. Apple card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City branch terms and [e-mail].

[Host (Journalist)]

We're back with Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona. Okay, so before the break, I played a clip of retired General Randy Manor telling my colleague Nicole Wallace earlier today that Pete Hegseth has already recommended strikes that CENTCOM commanders have refused for targeting civilian infrastructure. What'd you make of that?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Well, I'm not surprised. I mean, Pete Hegseth has been running around the Pentagon talking about maximum lethality, no mercy, no quarter, which I think most people realize what that is and that there would be a crime to conduct our military in that regard and kill people that are surrendering. So it's no surprise that we're first hearing about this. Hey, this stuff isn't new. I mean, you know, what, what we said back in November is the law. Anybody who graduated from the military academy at West Point would often walk by a plaque, and it says, when the law and orders are in conflict, you follow the law. So I'm not surprised. We have incredibly professional people in the military. And my hope would be that if the Secretary of Defense, not Secretary of War, the Secretary of Defense, were to order them to do something that was unlawful, that they would reject it.

[Host (Journalist)]

We're in. We're in quite a moment right now where that is required if it's happening. I mean, members of the military no doubt saw the President's threat today. Most of them, if not all of them, did. Some of them likely heard, if not all of them, Pete Hegseth's call for no quarter, no mercy for our enemies. A couple of weeks ago that you just talked about, what are the impacts of statements like those from the President and the Secretary of Defense on down the chain of command to people deployed in the region right now?

[Senator Mark Kelly]

Yeah, it makes it hard for them to do their jobs. I was talking to a mid grade officer today specifically about this and how they're struggling. Many of them, you know, are struggling with, you know, what have we become as a military? And they're thinking about their service and, you know, they're patriotic people. They're incredibly professional. But when you have this kind of leadership, especially at the top, it is a challenge for them. You know, they have to think about, you know, what, like, what are we doing here? And I feel for these guys and, you know, I did not want to see members of the military put in a position where they have to make these kind of decisions. But that's where we find ourselves.

[Host (Journalist)]

Before I let you go, I have to just ask you about the Artemis 2 mission, because we've all been watching it. It's been a moment, point of light, I would say, in what has been a difficult week. And we've seen remarkable images, including this incredible Earthset image that people can see on the right of the screen right now, recreating the iconic 1968 Earthrise photo on the left. And something that has struck me is just the way the astronauts on this mission have spoken about it and how from space the divisions among humans really disappear. I just wonder how you've been thinking about the split screen of this lunar mission and what it represents with this war and what it represents.

[Senator Mark Kelly]

That's a contrast, you know, for the time. Right. It makes me think back to 1968, Apollo 10, where Frank Borman, who, by the way, was from Tucson, was the commander of the mission. I'm here in Tucson today. Got a telegram from just like a random citizen who said, you saved 1968. Makes me think about that a little bit, whether these folks are saving 2026 a little bit here with some positive news and something we can really rally around. A, a, a, a stark contrast to what we're dealing with in a lot of different areas of the world, you know, right now. So I'm, I was there at the Johnson Space center yesterday as they went around the moon. I have to say, Jan, I was really jealous, you know, what these, what these guys got to do. I wish while I was at NASA for 15 years that one of my four space flights would have been, you know, around the moon or to Mars or something like that. But I'm really proud of our country for being able to do this thing. No other country can do this right now. What we did in this, this past week.

[Host (Journalist)]

Senator Mark Kelly, once and always an astronaut, too, thank you so much for being here with us tonight. Donald Trump, Donald Trump may have backed down from his threat to destroy Iran's entire civilization for now, for now, for the moment. But the fact that he made that threat in the first place spark calls from Democrats and Republicans for Donald Trump to be removed from office. Maryland Governor Wes Moore is standing by. There's always a lot to ask him about. I'm going to ask him what he thinks about that when we come back.

[Governor Wes Moore]

Subscribe to MSNow Premium on Apple Podcasts for early access, ad free listening and bonus content to all of MSNOW's original

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

podcast, including the chart topping series the Best People with Nicole Wallace, why is this Happening?

[Governor Wes Moore]

Main justice and more. Plus new episodes of all your favorite Ms. Now shows ad free and ad free listening to all of Rachel Maddow's original series, including Rachel Maddow Presents Burn Order. Subscribe to Ms. Now Premium on Apple Podcasts.

[Host (Journalist)]

Donald Trump may have backed down from his unhinged threat that Iran's whole civilization would die. As of now, the threat itself is one more piece of evidence that his opponents are using to call for his removal from office through Section 4 of the 25th Amendment. And that is a process, of course, that has never been tried before and one that almost certainly would not succeed, at least right now, because it requires the support of the majority of Trump's cabinet of sycophants or two thirds of a Congress that is led by little lackey Mike Johnson. And yet despite that, the calls to invoke the 25th Amendment are still growing. Already, dozens of elected Democrats in Congress have called for Trump to be removed through this process. Democratic Governor J.B. pritzker did, too. And just today, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi joined the growing chorus. But now even some right wing voices are joining the call for Trump to be removed through the 25th Amendment, like far right conspiracy theorist Alec Jones, and maybe more notably by former Trump ally and former MAGA congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. So, yeah, I guess you could say J.B. pritzker, Alex Jones, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Pelosi, y' all agree on something which is the president being unfit to serve. Joining me now is Maryland Governor Wes Moore. Before getting into politics, he served as a lieutenant with the 82nd Airborne Division in the U.S. army. Governor Moore, it's always great to see you. I mentioned it's unlikely to happen. It's great to see you. It's because it's because of who's in charge. And I talked a little bit with Senator Mark Kelly about this, too. But it's important to talk about whether the President of the United States is fit for office. There's a growing chorus. Do you think we're at a point where invoking the 25th Amendment is warranted? What's your view?

[Governor Wes Moore]

Well, I mean, I've long said that Donald Trump should not be the president of the United States. You know, what we saw this weekend was not in some kind of aberration. It was a continuation of the fact that he every single day continues to show that there is an unhinged nature to the way that he is approaching the job, and frankly, something where he is more selfish than selfless in the way that he approaches public service. I also know that I do not have a vote. I know that I am not holding my breath to think that the Republicans are going to have the courage to be able to do that. And so I'm going to focus on the things that I have to focus on as the governor of Maryland. The fact that we are watching how gas prices have jumped over a dollar in the past month, how energy prices have doubled over the process of the past year, how grocery prices continue to rise because the president continue to do this, illegal tariffs because he's throwing temper tantrums. And so we're just continuing to find ways of actually making our communities safer, making sure we're addressing rising costs and making sure that we're protecting Maryland from the fact that we have a president of the United States who frankly, should not be in that seat right now.

[Host (Journalist)]

I mentioned this. You're a veteran who served in the 82nd Airborne. We've talked about your service before. Thousands of soldiers from your old unit have been deployed to the Middle east amid this war and are now awaiting possible orders. Obviously, they're watching and seeing what the president is posting. I'm sure they're hoping for an end to this war as well. But those soldiers have a commander in chief who you say shouldn't be in office. I think others have said that, too. I wonder what your advice would be to current members of the 82nd Airborne about what this president might still ask them to do.

[Governor Wes Moore]

Well, I think we have a president who is. We have soldiers who are waiting for orders, but are still waiting for clarity of mission. Right. They're waiting for the commander in chief to tell them what to do, but they've yet to hear the commander in chief to tell them why they are doing it. And that is the problem that we have. We have the world's greatest military. We have a military that can accomplish anything at a moment's notice. No one is denying the power, the strength, or the. Or the. Or the definitive success ratio of the United States military. But just like any toy, well, the president's using it like a toy that should just be used in any way that the president sees fit. And so I continue to pray for our service members, and I continue to pray for their families that they don't just receive clarity from the commander in chief, but also that they're receiving orders that are legal, because that is how they have to think about ways they are going to manage this next phase of. Of not just these operations, but the next phase of their lives.

[Host (Journalist)]

I know for people like yourself or people who are no longer serving but have served in the past, this is incredibly difficult to watch and know what people are being asked to do who are serving in the military. Have you spoken to others you served with, and can you share some of their thoughts on what they're seeing?

[Governor Wes Moore]

Absolutely. And I've had numerous conversations with both people who are still in service now, but also people who. Who I serve with in Afghanistan. You know, I remember the morning that we got word that the 82nd Airborne Division, my old division, was mobilizing to the Middle East. And I spoke with someone who I served with in the 82nd, and, you know, he was even saying that, you know, when we were serving overseas, there were a few things that we always knew. One was that the use of military force was the last option that we had exhausted, that we should have exhausted every single option before military force was used. The second was that we had a clarity on mission and a clarity on the end game. And the third was that an international coalition was being built that would help take the pressure off of U.S. forces. The problem with this operation is none of those three things have been accomplished. Where initially it was said that, you know, that we had an imminent threat of nuclear weapons, despite the fact that months ago we were told that their nuclear program was obliterated. Then it was told that we could not deal with the Ayatollah and this current regime, and that we had to change the regime, even though now the new leadership is even more hardened than the leadership we had before. Then it was told about the Strait of Hormuz and the idea that the Iranians should not be in charge of the Strait of Hormuz, and it's the Iranians right now who are in charge of the Strait of Hormuz. And so we continue to see a goalpost that is moving because we have a president who is trying to figure out how to get out of this and save face, and that's not fair to the soldiers who then have to go and execute on these operations.

[Host (Journalist)]

I want to ask you about another reason you're in the news right now, which is your record in the military and in office has come under remarkably close scrutiny by the Baltimore sun on a phase. It's not a bad thing. Obviously, journalism is important, and certainly public figures should be scrutinized. But what people should know about the larger context is that the paper is now owned by a Trump ally named David Smith, who is the executive chairman of the Sinclair Broadcast Group. We've talked about the Sinclair Broadcast Group a lot on this show. And according to new reporting from Semaphore, the paper has brought on a team of investigators from Sinclair to come through your record. And in one message to your staff, they even threatened to present their findings to the secretary of the Army's office. Now, I have been, I have dealt with a lot of investigative reporters in my time. I have never heard of anything like that before. But explain for our viewers what is happening here.

[Governor Wes Moore]

Well, it's actually a very sad day because the Baltimore sun used to be our paper of record. It's now become the paper of the right wing. And I think we've seen how the readership has continued to decline. But it's happened because you've had a MAGA billionaire who is now currying favor for the president of the United States and utilizing what used to be a prize for paper for our region and now turning into something that is not much more than right wing trouble. You know, the, I'm deeply proud of my military service. I'm deeply proud of the fact that I served with, with, with people who I respect. And frankly, no one in the army questions my, the United States army doesn't question my integrity. The soldiers I serve with don't question my integrity. But we are seeing how the right wing and these right wing billionaires like David Smith is then using his wealth to be able to manipulate local media and is doing it not just in Maryland, but this is a canary in the coal mine for things that are happening all over the country. And they're doing it to curry favor for Donald Trump. And so it's unfortunate that this is where local news for the Baltimore sun and for the Sinclair properties have happened. But I do think it's an important warning shot for the rest of the country as well.

[Host (Journalist)]

Governor Westmore, thank you as always for joining me. I really appreciate it. Okay. My next guest says says the first casualty of Donald Trump's war with Iran was the truth. But thanks to some incredible new reporting out today, we are getting closer to the truth about how and why Donald Trump launched his war with Iran in the first place. David Remnick is the editor in chief of the New Yorker, and he joins me next. The reasons why Donald Trump ultimately decided to start a war of choice with Iran remain unclear. But today we got some incredible new insight into how he came to make that decision because excerpts from a forthcoming book by New York Times White House reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Smith Swan is out and excerpts of it are. And they draw on extensive interviews with House insiders conducted on the condition of anonymity. And they confirm what we have long suspected, that Trump has not been listening to his own advisors. We certainly know that. Or the intelligence presented from his own intelligence community. We know that, too. He has been listening to the intelligence presented in part by other countries, namely Israel. According to an excerpt from the forthcoming book in the situation room, on February 11, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a hard statement suggesting that Iran was ripe for regime change and expressing the belief that a joint U. S. Israeli mission could finally bring an end to the Islamic Republic. Netanyahu and his team outlined conditions they portrayed as pointing to near certain victory. Iran's ballistic missile program could be destroyed in a few weeks. They argued the regime would be so weakened that it could not choke off the Strait of Hormuz. And the likelihood that Iran would land blows against U.S. interests in neighboring countries was assessed as minimal. That was their assessment. Sounds good to me. Trump reportedly said Netanyahu took this as a green light, so there is that. Joining me now is David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker, for which he recently authored a piece titled the first casualty of Trump's War in Iran Was the Truth. An excellent, excellent, must read piece. I'm so grateful you could be here, David, because I think all of us are trying to consume all of the reporting out there and trying to make sense of what exactly is going on. And I started the show by talking about, man, Trump put this Truth Social post out. It's not easy, I know. I hope you're gonna help me here or help me at least use your decades of expertise, because Trump put out, as you know, a post about a two week ceasefire on Truth Social. The Iranian foreign minister said the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened if there was basically coordination with the Iranian military, which is a huge caveat. The Iranian National Security Council, which of course is speaking to the audience of the Iran, put out a statement that through Fars that basically said the US had agreed to the 10 point plan, which seems hard to believe as you're looking at this kind of through the eyes of a skeptical journalist. What is your assessment of what exactly is going on with this ceasefire right now?

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

Well, let's take the camera back a little bit. This is a strategic disaster. A disaster. We had a nuclear deal with Iran that was imperfect, but it was hard fought, hard won and was in place. And the only reason that Donald Trump came along in 2018 and abrogated that treaty. What's called the JCPOA was because it was crafted by Barack Obama and not him. The biggest. The existential threat that exists in Iran was the nuclear one. Yes, it has ballistic missiles. Yes, it has proxies, and there they're dreadful, and it's a dreadful regime. But the existential threat to Israel, to the region and beyond, was the nuclear threat. And that was under control. Imperfectly, but under control. It went out the window. And then in his second term, he has now done this. It is a strategic disaster on every level. If anything, it has the potential to speed up Iran's desire to have a nuclear weapon, because now it, like North Korea, it sees it as the one guarantee it won't be attacked again. We've ruined our relationships potentially, with many countries in our NATO alliance. We've thrown out the window what was left of our global leadership. I mean, the list goes on here. Do we leave the region if this is the end of the war, and I dearly, dearly hope it is, do we leave it a more secure place? Do the Iranian people now trust us after we threatened to decimate their civilization? Who talks like this? It used to be that a president's dignity was called into question when he wore a tan suit to a press conference.

[Host (Journalist)]

I remember that one.

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

I remember a president who speaks like that. I thought you might. I thought you might.

[Host (Journalist)]

It is so important to put it in the perspective. You just put it in about what's going on and what the impact has already been of just over a month of a war. Let me ask you about the role of Netanyahu here. You've profiled him. You've reported on him for a very long time. The New York Times points out how he was invited into the Situation Room, and he basically made this argument and pitch to Trump about striking Iran. He has made a version of that pitch to several presidents that I know of, but for decades. Are you at all surprised that he was successful, reportedly, in helping to convince Trump to go to a war to start a war with Iran?

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

Well, I read Maggie Haberman and John Swan's reporting in the Times, and it's excellent. But here's what it says, in essence, that Donald Trump believes who he wants to believe. He has his own vice president telling him this is a terrible idea. He has General Kaine saying this is a very risky thing that you're doing. And, you know, he was very straightforward about military capabilities, but also gave him every sense of the risk. It was made very plain to him that the Israelis at Netanyahu had no reason to have confidence in the notion of regime change. How would that possibly happen when the regime is so brutal and they just killed tens of thousands of their own people and would not hesitate for a second to do it again? And this is an opposition that is rich and runs very deep, but it's not an organized opposition. It's not like, you know, Eastern Europe in the late 80s that doesn't exist because of the brutality of the regime. There's no Gorbachev figure. There's no dissident movement that doesn't get crushed. It is a horrific, a horrific picture. But Donald Trump chose to believe what he wanted to believe and he stumbled forward and for all the reasons we know, both characterological and political. And now we're in the situation that we're in and the Iranian regime persists.

[Host (Journalist)]

I mentioned your excellent piece arguing the first casualty of this war was the truth. We unfortunately have a minute left here, but tell us what you mean by that.

[Guest Analyst / Journalist]

Well, it's an old saying by Aeschylus in ancient Greece that the first thing that goes out the window when you commit war is the truth. This president never even pretended to make a case about this to the American people. He was in the midst of negotiations ostensibly, and it's quite possible, according to many analysts, that when the Omani foreign minister came forward and said the day before the attack began that these negotiations were progressing in a halfway decent way, that there was a colossal misunderstanding between the Iranian negotiators and the American negotiators, and this all could have been avoided, not without trouble, not without prolonged negotiation or deception and a prolonged process. But anything is better than what just transpired and what may transpire further.

[Host (Journalist)]

David Remnick, thank you. Thank you so much for joining me. We'll be right back. That does it for me tonight. You can catch the show Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern on Ms. Now. And don't forget to follow the show on Blue Sky, Instagram and TikTok with VRBill's last minute deals. You can save over $50 on your spring getaway. So whether it's a mountain escape city break or a week at the beach, there's still time to get great discounts. Book your next day now. Average savings $72 select homes only.