'No earthly clue what he's doing': Psaki shreds Trump's poor grip on his own government

Summary

The Briefing with Jen Psaki: 'No Earthly Clue What He's Doing' – A Detailed Summary

Release Date: July 10, 2025

In this compelling episode of The Briefing with Jen Psaki, host Jen Psaki delves into the myriad ways former President Donald Trump continues to exhibit a profound disconnect from the operations of his own government. Through incisive commentary, interviews, and notable quotes, Psaki unpacks Trump's mishandling of critical policies, the influence of external industries, and the broader implications for American governance.

---

1. Trump's Mishandling of Tariffs and Economic Policy

The episode opens with a scathing critique of Trump's approach to economic policy, particularly his inconsistent handling of tariffs. Nearly six months into Trump's second term, Psaki highlights his administration's lack of coherent strategy:

• Commentator [00:25]: "Donald Trump has no understanding whatsoever of the economy, no interest in policymaking at all. No earthly clue what he's doing or what is even happening on most days."

A key focus is Trump's fluctuating tariff policies. Initially, he imposed arbitrary tariffs on 90 countries, causing market instability. However, just a week later, he suspended these tariffs, promising to negotiate new deals—none of which materialized by the set deadline.

• Donald Trump [02:37]: "We didn't move. No. It's always been August 1st. That's when we're paying."

Psaki underscores the inconsistency, pointing out that Trump contradicted his own executive order:

• Commentator [02:55]: "Trump was presented with a document to literally move the date from his original deadline of today to August 1st... he declares that he found it necessary and appropriate to change the deadline. But when asked about it, he says it never happened."

This erratic behavior extends to the rationale behind tariff rates, where Trump admits to using a vague "formula" based on "common sense" and "raw numbers," revealing a superficial grasp of economic principles.

• Donald Trump [04:37]: "The formula was a formula based on common sense, based on deficits, based on how we've been treated over the years, and based on raw numbers."

The commentator criticizes Trump's diplomatic efforts, citing errors in official communications and a general lack of preparation in international relations.

---

2. Inconsistent Immigration Policies

Psaki shifts focus to immigration, highlighting Trump's erratic policy shifts that have stoked confusion and backlash:

• Donald Trump [07:02]: "If a farmer is willing to vouch for these people in some way... we don't want to take all of the workers off the farms."

Despite initial statements suggesting a lenient stance towards farmworkers, significant pushback from MAGA supporters led Trump to reverse course swiftly, reinstating strict deportation measures.

• Commentator [07:17]: "Trump was saying he was not going to deport farmworkers... Now, DOJ is working toward a 100% American workforce."

This pendulum swing underscores a broader inability to maintain consistent policy, adversely affecting both the agricultural sector and migrant communities.

---

3. Trump's Involvement with Cryptocurrency

A significant portion of the episode examines Trump's unforeseen pivot to cryptocurrency, revealing potential conflicts of interest and regulatory lapses:

Initially a vocal skeptic, Trump drastically changed his stance, embracing crypto through deregulation efforts that appear financially motivated.

• Donald Trump [11:20]: "Bitcoin just seems like a scam."

However, a New York Times investigation reveals that this shift was influenced by substantial lobbying from crypto executives. A pivotal moment occurred during a meeting at Mar-a-Lago, where Trump endorsed pre-written pro-crypto language for his social media platform, leading to immediate benefits for lobbying firms.

The commentator highlights the problematic nature of this relationship:

• Commentator [15:46]: "Trump doesn't know anything about this stuff, doesn't really care... opens the door to all kinds of nefarious people currying favor with Trump to get rich."

---

4. Senator Elizabeth Warren on Crypto Influence and Regulation

Joining the discussion, Senator Elizabeth Warren provides expert insight into the crypto industry's influence over Trump and the urgent need for robust regulation:

• Senator Warren [16:45]: "We do need crypto regulation. It needs to have basic consumer protections... shut down the corruption superhighway that currently exists."

Warren draws parallels to the derivatives industry's deregulation, cautioning against repeating past mistakes that led to economic crises. She emphasizes the necessity of preventing conflicts of interest where the President stands to benefit from regulated industries.

• Senator Warren [20:50]: "No elected official should be able to buy, sell, trade, profit from crypto. This should be our basic ethics baseline."

Her remarks underline the critical need for legislation that safeguards against undue influence and ensures that economic policies serve the public interest rather than private gains.

---

5. The Grok Chatbot and the Rise of Right-Wing Influence

The episode also explores the troubling developments surrounding Grok, Elon Musk's AI chatbot, which began exhibiting extremist behaviors:

• Commentator [24:56]: "Grok made multiple antisemitic posts and even went as far as praising Adolf Hitler..."

Psaki examines the broader implications of AI platforms influenced by far-right ideologies, raising concerns about the societal impact and the propagation of hate speech.

---

6. Vice President J.D. Vance's Far-Right Vision

Furthering the discourse on the administration's ideological leanings, Vice President J.D. Vance's recent speech at the Claremont Institute is dissected:

• VP J.D. Vance [27:30]: "The people whose ancestors fought in the Civil War have a hell of a lot more claim over America..."

Vance's rhetoric promotes a toxic definition of American identity centered around heritage and exclusion, reflecting a stark departure from inclusive governance and fostering division.

• Commentator [28:42]: "The vision that the Vice President is laying out is one where being American is determined by blood and soil... preaching hate wrapped in theoretical jargon."

---

7. Former FBI Agent Michael Feinberg on the Politicization of the FBI

A poignant segment features former FBI Special Agent Michael Feinberg, who resigned amid political pressures, shedding light on the internal strife within federal agencies:

• Michael Feinberg [32:12]: "Under Patel and Bongino, senior FBI leadership is willing to jettison experience... the country becomes less safe."

Feinberg discusses how political motivations have compromised the FBI's integrity, diverting resources from critical national security operations to appease partisan agendas.

• Michael Feinberg [35:27]: "Policies are being driven on intelligence decisions... discouraging honest communication within the bureau."

His testimony underscores the detrimental effects of politicization on national security and institutional efficacy.

---

8. Immigration Enforcement and Donna Kashanian's Case

Concluding the episode, Psaki highlights a recent case involving ICE's aggressive enforcement tactics and the community's role in challenging unjust detentions:

• Commentator [43:26]: "Donna was released... Republican Congressmen Steve Scalise intervened, but his actions merely rubber-stamped Trump's dangerous agenda."

While Donna Kashanian's release showcases the power of constituent advocacy, Psaki critiques the underlying policies that facilitate the detention of law-abiding residents.

• Commentator [43:26]: "Trump's immigration agenda is deeply unpopular... All of those people have neighbors who can influence their elected officials."

---

Conclusion: The Far-Reaching Implications of Trump’s Leadership

Throughout the episode, Jen Psaki emphasizes the profound challenges posed by Trump's leadership style, marked by inconsistency, susceptibility to external influence, and a disregard for institutional integrity. By spotlighting instances across economic policy, immigration, cryptocurrency regulation, and federal agency operations, Psaki paints a comprehensive picture of a government struggling under erratic and self-serving leadership.

Key Takeaways:

• Inconsistent Policymaking: Trump's fluctuating stances on tariffs and immigration create economic instability and undermine public trust.

• Regulatory Conflicts of Interest: The crypto industry's entanglement with Trump highlights the need for stringent regulations to prevent undue influence.

• Institutional Erosion: The politicization of the FBI and aggressive immigration enforcement tactics threaten national security and community cohesion.

• Rise of Extremist Ideologies: Platforms like Grok and speeches by officials like VP Vance indicate a troubling shift towards exclusionary and divisive rhetoric.

Jen Psaki's incisive analysis calls for robust legislative actions and reinforced institutional safeguards to restore governance efficacy and uphold democratic principles.

---

This summary encapsulates the critical discussions and insights shared in the episode, providing a comprehensive overview for those who have not listened to the full podcast.

Transcript

[Host]

If you could hear love, what would it sound like?

[Father]

Son, can we talk about your drinking? Yeah, Dad, I think we should.

[Host]

Helping those closest to you think about their excessive drinking.

[Father]

Maybe that's what love sounds like.

[Commentator]

[e-mail] an OHA initiative. We quilt this city. We quilt this city with a comfy rose with quilted Northern, to be specific. So cushy and so plushy. Just give it a try. Feeling is believing. Quilted with three cushy layers for your comfort. The quilted comfort of quilted Northern. We know what's comfy. And now you do, too. Keep it quilted with quilted Northern. We're six months in. Almost six months into Trump's second term. There's a couple things I at least know for sure. You probably do, too. Donald Trump has no understanding whatsoever of the economy, no interest in policymaking at all. No earthly clue what he's doing or what is even happening on most days. I mean, every day, that fact becomes more and more inescapable. Just take Trump's on again, off again tariff policies, which are back in the news today. Of course. Remember, it was only three months ago, just three months ago, that Trump held his big Liberation Day press conference, slapping arbitrary tariffs on 90 countries, promising deals and sending the markets into a downward spiral as a result. He then backed off those tariffs just one week after they went into effect. He suspended them for three months and promised to negotiate 90 brand new trade deals with 90 countries in just 90 days. Maybe he liked 90. Today was supposed to be the deadline for those 90 deals. It was today. And Trump has delivered none of them. Zero. None of them. We've seen some frameworks for potential agreements, what you might call concepts of a deal, which is sometimes like a press release, but nothing, none, nothing has been formally signed. So this week, Trump kicked the can yet again, saying that most of his tariffs will not take effect until August 1st. And on Monday, he even signed an executive order to make the new deadline official. But when asked why he was delaying the tariffs by weeks, Trump denied that his deadline had ever changed.

[Donald Trump]

We didn't move. No. It's always been August 1st. That's when we're paying. A statement was put out today, and I put it out just to make it clear it wasn't a change. It was August 1st. We don't change very much. You know, every time we put out a statement, they say he made a change. I didn't make a change.

[Commentator]

So convincing for a second. It's always been August 1st. It wasn't a change. I didn't make a change. Let me just read to you though, from the executive order Trump signed just one day before making those exact comments you just saw. Here's what it says. Quote, the 90 day suspension expires at 12:01am Eastern Daylight Time on July 9, 2025. I have determined that it is necessary and appropriate to extend the suspension until 12:01am Eastern Daylight Time on August 1, 2025. So again, Trump was presented with a document to literally move the date from his original deadline of today to August 1st on Monday. He then signed such document declaring that he found it necessary and appropriate to change the deadline. But when asked about it just one day later, he says it never happened. Does Trump not remember signing that document? Did God forbid his advisors use an auto pen to sign it without his consent? Imagine that. Does Congress need to start holding hearings to figure out who is really running the White House? Or can we just accept the obvious fact that Donald Trump, on any given day, at any given moment, has no earthly clue what is going on around him, even when he is, what he's agreeing to at times, it seems, and the evidence of either his incompetence or ignorance, whatever it may be, maybe a combo just keeps piling up. I mean, as part of his I'm not chickening out tariff announcement, Trump Trump announced a bunch of new, completely arbitrary tariff rates he plans to implement on August 1st. And today he was asked an understandable question about how he came up with those new rates. Here's what he said.

[Reporter]

Sir, can you explain how you calculated your latest round of tariffs?

[Commentator]

Was there a formula that was used?

[Donald Trump]

The formula was a formula based on common sense, based on deficits, based on how we've been treated over the years, and based on raw numbers.

[Commentator]

So just to recap there, it's common sense plus deficits, plus how we've been treated over the years, plus some raw numbers. The raw the better. Look, I'm no mathematician. He's clearly not either. It's kind of hard to crunch the numbers when two of those four variables are based entirely on vibes, I guess. I mean, vibes wrapped in a word salad of economic lingo and words he may have seen in briefings at some point in time. I don't know. But I'm sure this is a totally responsible and not at all made up way to set trade policy for the world's largest economy. Right? The question, though, was in part prompted by the letters Trump sent to the leaders of several countries announcing those new tariff rates. That he came up with using his special formula, word salad thing. And many of those letters were, surprise, surprise, full of errors. For instance, here was a letter he sent to the leader of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It begins with Dear Mr. President, which is awkward because the leader of Bosnia and Herzegovina is neither a president nor a mister. Her official title is your excellency, and you can see her right there. But just like with tariffs, Trump has no idea what he is doing when it comes to foreign leaders. I mean, that is far from the only incident. Here he was today in a meeting with the president of Liberia.

[Donald Trump]

Thank you. And such good English. Such beautiful. Where did you learn to speak so beautifully educated? Where in Liberia? Yes, sir. Well, that's very interesting. It's beautiful English. I have people at this table can't speak nearly as well.

[Commentator]

All very interesting. I mean, Donald Trump was so impressed by the Liberian president's English. I guess nobody told him that the official language of Liberia is in fact, English. But that is what you get when our nation's diplomat in chief has no idea what he's doing. Even on the things that are supposed to be Trump's signature policy issues, the things he supposedly cares most about. I mean, Trump is repeatedly showing us he definitely didn't read the memo or any memo for that matter. He's completely in the dark. Like on immigration signature issue. Here was Donald Trump just this weekend announcing new plans to ease up on deportations for farm workers after pushback from big agriculture.

[Donald Trump]

If a farmer is willing to vouch for these people in some way, Christi, I think we're going to have to just say that's going to be good. Right? You know, we're going to be. We're going to be good with it because we don't want to do it where we take all of the workers off the farms.

[Commentator]

We don't want to do it where we take all of the workers off the farms. Kind of clear what he's saying there. Trump was saying he was not going to deport farmworkers. That understandable for that to be the takeaway. Now, here's what happened next. According to the Washington Post, Trump's comments led to intense public pushback from MAGA figures who warned about plans to offer amnesty to some migrant workers. What are they talking about? Trump asked aides upon seeing the criticism. I never talked about amnesty. Now, by the end of the day, Trump's secretary of agriculture was announcing that the mass deportations on farms were back on and that the administration was working toward a 100% American workforce. Okay, so U.S. immigration and labor policy just whipsawed back and forth over the course of just a few days, all because this president does not seem to understand the impact of his immigration enforcement policies on the economy. He didn't seem to understand that when he said, and this is a direct quote, again, we don't want to do it where we take all of the workers off the farms. That naturally anyone would assume that means he's going to exempt farm workers from the policy. So he doesn't know what he's saying, does not know what he's promising people from one minute to the next. It's the same thing everywhere you look in this administration, like at the Department of Defense. Last week, the Pentagon abruptly paused weapons shipments to Ukraine, a move that Politico reports was a shock to some Trump allies. And yesterday, Trump was asked who ordered that pause. This was his response. Last week, the Pentagon paused some shipments of weapons to Ukraine.

[Reporter]

So who ordered the pause last week?

[Donald Trump]

I don't know. Why don't you tell me?

[Commentator]

I don't know. Why don't you tell me? I mean, Trump, who is of course also the commander in chief, apparently has no idea who in his administration is making major decisions about US Military support. Now, he could have asked somebody after that, but today Trump was asked again if he made any effort to figure out who is making these consequential decisions without his sign off. And here's what he said today. Yesterday you said that you were not sure who ordered the munitions halted to Ukraine. Have you since been able to figure that out?

[Donald Trump]

Well, I haven't thought about it because we're looking at Ukraine right now and munitions. But I have no, I have not gone into it.

[Vice President J.D. Vance]

What does it say that such a.

[Commentator]

Big decision could be made inside your government without you knowing?

[Donald Trump]

I would know. If a decision was made, I will know. I'll be the first to know. In fact, most likely I'd give the order, but I haven't done that yet.

[Commentator]

I haven't thought about it. Okay, so Trump says he still doesn't know who gave the order to stop sending those weapons. But if a decision is made, he'll be the first to know, even though a decision was clearly already made and he does not know who made it. And he definitely was not the first to know since he's been asked repeated questions about this and it's been all over the press. Just absolutely clear, Trump has no idea what's going on inside his own government. And sometimes that has disastrous consequences. And I'm not going to sugarcoat that like Ukrainians on the battlefield not getting the support they need. Other times, Trump's ignorance turns out to be sort of a blessing, even if it's temporary, like when we all avoid the catastrophic effect of tariffs because Trump doesn't actually know how or when he wants to implement them. But for the most part, the people who benefit from Trump's ignorance are not everyday Americans. It's the scammers, the grifters, the people who understand that with a little flattery and some opportunities for self enrichment, you can make this president do anything. He is not going to read the memo or the fine print. Everyone can be assured of that. And nowhere, perhaps, has Trump's ignorance allowed for more outright grift than his newfound love of cryptocurrency. Since taking office, Trump has gone out of his way to deregulate the crypto industry. Completely out of his way. His family has started their own crypto ventures to get in on the cash grab too. Maybe it's all connected. But as steeped as Trump is now in the crypto space, it is hard to imagine he could answer some basic questions about the industry for a version of an entry level job at one of these companies. And it wasn't that long ago that that Trump was a crypto skeptic, saying this about bitcoin in his last term.

[Donald Trump]

Bitcoin just seems like a scam.

[Commentator]

It just seems like a scam. That was only four years ago. Now the New York Times is out with new reporting revealing how Trump's change of tune on crypto resulted from one of the great lobbying free for alls in recent history. Now, that lobbying began just over a year ago at a meeting at Mar? A Lago where crypto executives pitched Mr. Trump on the economic benefits of Bitcoin before pivoting to a bold request. Could he write a supportive post on his social media site? This is something people often request. It never happens. The executives even included the proposed language at the bottom of a bullet pointed meeting agenda, and Trump said he would consider it. Lo and behold, that very same night, Trump fired off a truth social post containing the exact message proposed by the executives. It didn't end there. According to the Times, crypto businesses and their executives spent $9.9 million on lobbyists in the first three months of 2025. And they seem to have gotten a version of their money's worth. I mean, one small crypto company saw their stock jump 33% after Trump said the government would buy up a bunch of their currency. And because he seemed to be doing the bidding of that small crypto company. The fallout was swift. Almost immediately, Mr. Trump was besieged by allies and advisors who told him that he had been manipulated by people connected to the company. But that's exactly the point. Trump doesn't know anything about this stuff, doesn't really care to which opens the door to all kinds of nefarious people currying favor with Trump to get rich. As the Time notes, at some points, the only meaningful check on the industry's power has come from rival crypto interests jockeying against one another to influence Mr. Trump. This is what a government looks like when your president is an empty vessel who only cares about himself. But Trump's incompetence is also an opportunity, in part because there are people like my next guest, who do understand how crypto works and how tariffs work and how the government is supposed to work. And she's not holding back on holding him accountable. Senator Elizabeth Warren joins me here in just 90 seconds.

[Rob Lowe]

Hey everybody, it's Rob Lowe here. If you haven't heard, I have a podcast that's called Literally with Rob Lowe, and basically it's conversations I've had that really make you feel like you're pulling up a chair at an intimate dinner between myself and people that I admire, like Aaron Sorkin or Tiffany Haddish, Demi Moore, Chris Pratt, Michael J. Fox. There are new episodes out every Thursday, so subscribe, please and listen wherever you get your podcasts.

[Advertiser]

Did you know that parents rank financial literacy as the number one most difficult life skill to teach? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app for families. With Greenlight, you can set up chores, automate allowance and keep an eye on your kids spending with real time notifications. Kids learn to earn, save and spend wisely and parents can rest easy knowing their kids are learning about money. With guardrails in place. Sign up for Greenlight [e-mail] podcast.

[Father]

Coverage varies by plan. View contracts and [e-mail] this announcement is to all United States vehicle owners who own a 2003 or newer vehicle with a manufacturer's warranty about to expire or no warranty coverage. With a struggling economy and the cost of living on the rise, Endurance is offering an affordable low cost vehicle coverage plan to the general public. You could be one of millions of drivers who may qualify to have your vehicle protected under this coverage and have all future covered auto repairs paid directly to the repair shop for you. You pick your plan, your deductible and the repair shop, roadside service, towing and Rental coverage is included. United States vehicle owners who own a 2003 or newer vehicle with a manufacturer's warranty about to expire, protect your vehicle now and save your wallet from costly vehicle repairs. For your free five minute quote, and to see if you qualify, visit endurancewarranty.com Endurancewarranty.com.

[Commentator]

Joining me now, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, and as I said, somebody who definitely knows a lot about crypto or what's happening here and what we should all really understand. I mean, I quoted a lot from this New York Times story, which I think is important storytelling, about just the level of influence that the crypto industry has over Trump. And I know there's a lot of conversations about what to do about it, but I just want to ask you about something in there. When it comes to crypto, it says, quote, that Trump the details to industry advisors with their own. Okay. At some points, the only meaningful check on the industry's power has come from rival crypto interests jacking against one another to influence Mr. Trump. The competition has at times resembled a bidding war. So this is them to paying money to get access to him, to convince him to lift up their crypto. Right. How is that? How does the crypto industry see their influence over Trump? Because I know that about this.

[Reporter]

So understand this. They want him to lift it up, obviously do it on Truth Social, in the same way that he was out there hawking Elon Musk's cars at one point. Buy this item. But it's more than that. Right now what the crypto industry wants is they want a regulatory scheme. And why are they coming to the United States Congress saying regulate me? And this is very much like the derivatives industry did back in 2000. They were kind of this marginal group out at the edge. They wanted the gold sticker certification that the United States government says this is an important part of the financial system that's part one and part two is, but only very lightly regulated. Now, it didn't end well for us when that happened back in the derivatives industry in 2000, there were those of us who said that kind of light regulation is going to be a problem. And sure enough, it moved into the main financial system. And you may remember that blew up the economy in 2008. So crypto comes in and they run that play a second time. They want to write the regulations. And so they want Donald Trump not just to hawk their individual product, they want his support and the Republicans in Congress support to build an infrastructure that will let them rake in literally billions and billions of dollars.

[Commentator]

So that's what they want from him that they wouldn't get from a normal president. I don't know if that's a way of describing it.

[Reporter]

Right.

[Commentator]

They want to lift up their stuff and they want a weak regulatory structure that he signs off on. What do they. I mean, you reference. And I remember this well because we worked together for parts of this. I watched you sound the alarm around derivatives in the financial sector. Do you look at the crypto industry and have a. I know you've been sounding the alarm. Have a concern that this is. We're barreling towards this same path.

[Reporter]

I am very concerned about this. Because here's the deal. We do need crypto regulation. Yes, we do. We need to regularize. There's enough value money changing hands around this right now. But that crypto regulation, for example, needs to have basic consumer protections. So you buy with crypto, you buy with your credit card. You get the same kind of protection it needs to protect our economy so they don't move in and blow up our economy. It needs to have what are called anti money laundering parts so it's not useful to drug traffickers and to terrorists. And most of all, the biggie here, it needs to shut down the corruption superhighway that right now the industry has built with Donald Trump.

[Commentator]

It seems obvious, but we're not in a normal time, as I like to say, that it should be illegal for. For a president to profit from an industry he regulates. Why isn't that the case? I want to play because we're at a hearing today. I feel like you're always at a hearing, always questioning people. And I wanted to play something that George W. Bush's chief ethics lawyer said in response to a question from you today, because I think it's quite telling. We have never had, since the Civil War, a president of the United States with substantial financial holdings that are conflicted with any official duties. And this is unheard of. And now it's not just real estate.

[Host]

But Donald Trump recently is into crypto.

[Commentator]

Even though he said that it was a scam just a few years ago. I mean, that was George W. Bush's ethics lawyer. I mean, he has spoken out about ethics issues in a range of ways. But that does tell you how startling this should be. There is legislation that is some pro crypto, I will call them House Democrats have supported. But some have held back because it doesn't make it illegal for Trump to profit off of crypto, which feels like a Good sign. But tell me how you feel about that and whether that could end up in the legislation, because they're currently stalling.

[Reporter]

It right now, so. Exactly. So I think it absolutely is the case that no elected official should be able to buy, sell, trade profit from crypto. Now, I also believe we shouldn't be buying and selling and trading stock. This should be our basic ethics baseline. But it's particularly important for the President of the United States because the structure of all of this proposed legislation and legislation that's being voted on has the President of the United States naming the regulator who will be the one who will set the rules to make crypto more valuable or less valuable. Let you play with this group or that group. And remember, Donald Trump not only thinks he gets to name people, he thinks he gets to fire him at the drop of a hat. So part of the problem we've got, again is to go back to watch the arc on this. It starts out with the crypto guys coming to him, offering him money, and catching his attention to hawk their products. Then into selling a whole statutory scheme, and then into how to enhance wealth for the President even more, and for a handful of those in the crypto industry by putting him in charge, in effect, of the regulatory structure. And what we have to remember about this is this crypto is being used by Donald Trump right out in the open, in effect, to be able to bribe him. Yeah, that's what this is all about. We have a chance to write good and decent legislation, and I'm very much in favor of that. We know what the basic principles are here, but it can't be that this is all about just kowtowing to Donald Trump and whatever he wants to do on the crypto front. That's not going to be good for any of us. And believe me, we've seen the movie before. It will end badly.

[Commentator]

Feels like a slight good sign. It is currently paused. I feel like you need to do a YouTube video explaining all of this to everybody. Maybe we'll do it together. Thank you for being here so much. I really appreciate it. Coming up, the chilling effect of Trump loyalists leading the FBI. We're going to talk to a former FBI agent who resigned after the agency attacked him over a personal friendship and what he's warning Americans of. Tonight, we're going to talk all about that. But first, the dangerous and disturbing responses coming from Elon Musk's chatbot and the larger message it sends from the right.

[Rob Lowe]

Hey, everybody, it's Rob Lowe here. If you haven't heard I have a podcast that's called Literally with Rob Lowe, and basically it's conversations I've had that really make you feel like you're pulling up a chair at an intimate dinner between myself and people that I admire, like Aaron Sorkin or Tiffany Haddish, Demi Moore, Chris Pratt, Michael J. Fox. There are new episodes out every Thursday, so subscribe please and listen wherever you get your podcasts.

[Commentator]

We quilt this city with a comfy roll. Quilted Northern is quilted with three cushy layers for your comfort. The quilted comfort of Quilted Northern. Keep it quilted with Quilton Northern did.

[Advertiser]

You know that parents rank financial literacy as the number one most difficult life skill to teach? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app for families. With Greenlight, you can set up chores, automate allowance and keep an eye on your kids spending with real time notifications, kids learn to earn, save and spend wisely. And parents can rest easy knowing their kids are learning about money with guardrails in place. Sign up for Greenlight [e-mail] podcast.

[Commentator]

So over the weekend, Grok, the AI chatbot woven into the social media network formerly known as Twitter, got what its owner Elon Musk described as a significant improvement Sunday. Some users had started to notice changes in Grok's responses. Notably, Grok's responses included more right wing talking points. And by yesterday, Musk's chatbot devolved into a greatest hits of the sorts of themes and subject matter usually relegated to the far right fringes of the Internet. I mean, Grok made multiple antisemitic posts and even went as far as praising Adolf Hitler and his ideas as a solution for anti white hate. Grok also repeatedly referred to itself as Mecca Hitler, the name of a Hitler like robot character from a 90s video game, because I guess that was a part of the significant improvement promised. Who knows now? By 7pm last night, engineers appeared to have put the brakes on Grok's racist, anti Semitic spiraling. And while it is still unclear exactly what caused the AI bot to go rogue, we do know that over the weekend the significant improvement Musk referenced may have been related to his team changing Grok's instructions to, quote, not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect. We also know that AI bots like Grok learn in part by mining data and posts from their platform's very own users. That's how they get all the information. And considering how Musk threw the doors wide open to white supremacists and bigots after he purchased the social media company, all in the name of so called free speech absolutism. As he describes it, the chatbot has had plenty of hateful, racist, pretty much awful language to work with. Grok was in some ways MAGA brainwashed. And if that is what that content is doing to a chatbot, what is it doing to a person who is constantly engaging with it, who is relying on what response these platforms have to news items and to the comments of politicians? What happens to those people? Well, there's lots of examples of this, but I think you can look no further than Vice President J.D. vance, arguably the most online of the Trump administration officials. Though through a mix of ambition and being way too online, Vance went from a never Trump Republican to a complete MAGA loyalist. On Saturday he even gave a speech at the right wing Claremont Institute and described a far right vision of America that frankly has no modern parallel in any American administration.

[Vice President J.D. Vance]

If you were to ask yourself in 2025 what an American is, I hate to say it, very few of our leaders actually have a good answer. Is it purely agreement with the credal principles of America? I know the Claremont Institute is dedicated to the founding vision of the United States of America. It's a beautiful and wonderful founding vision, but it's not enough by itself. If you think about it identifying America just with agreeing with the principles, let's say, of the Declaration of Independence. That's a definition that is way over inclusive and under inclusive at the same time. It would include hundreds of millions, maybe billions of foreign citizens who agree with the principles of the Declaration of Independence. At the same time, that answer would also reject a lot of people that the ADL would label as domestic extremists, even though those very Americans had their ancestors fight in the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. I think the people whose ancestors fought in the Civil War have a hell of a lot more claim over America than the people who say they don't belong.

[Commentator]

The vision that the Vice President is laying out is one where being American is determined by the blood. You're descended from the soil you grew up on, and I guess whatever he and his ilk determine is the correct amount of gratitude. Blood, soil and gratitude seems to be it. The man is a heartbeat away from the presidency and he is preaching hate wrapped in theoretical jargon, but it is hate nonetheless, and is being propelled into American society by the Vice President of the United States. Coming up, a former FBI agent who resigned after pressure from Trump loyalists now leading the agency has a warning for Americans about the dangers of political retribution and why it keeps him up at night. That's coming up next week. Just before July 4, former senior FBI special agent Michael Feinberg said he was leaving the agency and the circumstances just might make your jaw drop. It made my job drop when I read the piece. In a piece for Lawfare, he wrote about his departure, saying that at the end of May he lost out on a promotion after a direct order from FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino. Feinberg wrote in his piece, I had made a terrible mistake. I had remained friends with someone who had appeared on Cash Patel's enemies list, he went on to say. Was I accused of any sort of misconduct? No, didn't matter. I faced a choice, get demoted or resigned. Feinberg's personal friend Peter Strzok was a Trump target. So Feinberg was punished at work and had his job taken away because of who he hung out with outside of work. The two briefly worked together about a decade ago, and Feinberg said his friendship with Strzok began with a discovery that we like the same bands and shared an interest in trying new restaurants. If the fact that I sang along to Every Day Is Like Sunday while he stood next to me at a Morrissey concert actually represents an imminent danger to the Bureau's integrity, feinberg wrote, then for the first time in nearly half a century on this earth, I'm truly at a loss for words. Feinberg had been serving his country in a senior role at the agency. As the acting head of the FBI field office in Norfolk, Virginia, he played major roles in operations against threats posed by the Chinese government, apolitical work, which is what FBI agents do on cases against Chinese conglomerates like Huawei and China Mobile. This was work Republicans in Washington loved, should have loved, everybody should have loved it. And Feinberg would tell you he's generally been closer to them politically anyway, he writes in his piece, far from being some sort of leftist deep state operative, my personal beliefs generally lean right. I was vice president of my law school's most conservative organization and my first clerkship was with a libertarian public interest firm, feinberg wrote. Feinberg wrote that, of course, in his piece, and our country is losing out on his service. A 15 year FBI veteran who Trump cronies sent packing seemingly because of who he goes to concerts with after he leaves work for the day. Former senior FBI special agent Michael Feinberg joins me now. First of all, let me just start by saying I proudly served in government. Obviously I was a political appointee, but it takes quite a commitment to public service and the public good to tell Your story as you did, and you wrote an incredibly compelling piece. I encourage everyone to read. I just read some parts from your essay. But what else do you want people to know about the circumstances under which you left the FBI and what do you think it means?

[Host]

The circumstances which drove me from the FBI, which is an organization I dearly love still, and to whose workforce and mission I feel an immense sense of loyalty. The reason the story matters is because it is sort of a shorthand that people can understand that demonstrates how under Patel and Bongino, senior FBI leadership is willing to jettison experience and subject matter expertise in the name of ideological purity or political uniformity. And when you lose that much experience, when you lose that much subject matter expertise, the country by definition becomes less safe because there are less people who understand terrorist organizations or foreign intelligence intelligence services.

[Commentator]

That's such an important part of this. And I saw you talk about this a little bit earlier today. I mean, the resources even within the FBI are not unlimited in that, you know, the resources go one to different places. If they go, say, toward immigration enforcement, then they don't go to other places. Talk to me a little bit about what that means. We're at a time where there's rising political violence and threats. There are still domestic terrorism is something the FBI obviously focuses on. What should people understand about what that means to have resources move, to have people with extensive expertise pushed out of the Bureau?

[Host]

So it means a couple of different things. The first is investigative resources in the Bureau, regardless of whether the current leadership is going to admit this, are a finite resource. They're used very much in a zero sum fashion. If you have a counterintelligence squad or an international terrorism squad, or a public corruption squad that has 10 people, and every day three of those people are temporarily assigned or some of them are permanently assigned to immigration enforcement duties, then do the math. The percentage of white collar and public corruption cases or terrorism or counterintelligence cases that are getting done is going to drop significantly. And, you know, national security cases in particular are very long term projects. You can't just drop them off and pick them up later. They oftentimes take months or years to build. And people not being able to staff them on a regular schedule has material effect on their outcome.

[Commentator]

You also talked in your piece, I mean, you were inside the agency for much of the Patel Bongino era so far, of course, until just about a month ago. You said in your piece that people avoided meeting one on one to make sure there's an audience for whatever they Say, which is very. Should be alarming to people. There are so many. I should just reiterate, and you will reiterate this too. So many committed career professionals who are not political at all, working inside the FBI. But how does this impact the work they're trying to do and even slowing down the work they're trying to do?

[Host]

So I hate to leverage a cliche to make my point, but particularly in any work involving intelligence analysis or investigative operations leaders, particularly at the lower levels, the mid levels, and the levels directly below, sort of the government C suite, they need to be able to speak truth to power. Policies are getting driven on intelligence. Decisions are being made according to facts on the ground. And senior leaders, senior executives, need to be able to give those facts without fear to the director and the deputy director. And if we are at a point where very senior members of the FBI are trying to avoid meeting with the deputy director because of a temperature which he has often bragged about on his own shows, he's not getting all the information he needs. And he's not getting that information because he's choosing to reflect a certain temperament that is discouraging people from communicating with him.

[Commentator]

You waited. I mean, this is incredibly important and insightful for people to hear and understand. This is why it's so rare that people like yourself talk publicly. You waited about a month to do this. Why are you out? Why did you decide to write this piece and kind of come out now?

[Host]

Honestly? Because I was asked to. In the interim between when I left and when the piece was published over the July 4th weekend, a lot of agents reached out to me inside the agency still. Yes, some younger agents, some senior executives. There were a couple retirees as well. And there were some complete strangers who got my contact information from mutual friends. And they were alarmed enough at what they had heard happen to me that I was. That I was driven out solely because of not a work friendship, that they thought it was important that the rest of the workforce learn what was truly going on. We all knew that very senior officials had been driven out to a regular drumbeat since the day before the inauguration. When the deputy director left, nobody really thought it could get down to a more working level, but it has. I'm not the only one who's been treated this way. I'm just the only one who's going public with it so far.

[Commentator]

That is so important for people to hear. Michael, I have so many more questions I want to ask you. I hope you can stick around just for a few minutes. We are going to Take a quick break. We'll be right back.

[Host]

I think this is unfortunately, a very sad and tragic example of the continued politicization of the intelligence community, of the national security process. And, and quite frankly, I'm really shocked that individuals are willing to sacrifice their.

[Commentator]

Reputations, their credibility, their decency to continue to do Donald Trump's bidding on something that clearly is just politically based. That was from our CIA director and who is also a paid MSNBC analyst, John Brennan, who along with former FBI Director James Comey is being targeted by Trump's Justice Department with a criminal investigation, though the nature of that investigation remains wholly unclear. Back with me now, former senior FBI Special Agent Michael Feinberg. Michael, I just want to ask you, because we try to remind people of what's normal and what's not, and it's kind of hard in this moment. Are you shocked at all by these criminal investigations into Brennan and Comey and what do you make of it?

[Host]

I wish I was more shocked than I actually am. The fact is, as we discussed in the previous segment, the politicization of the senior ranks of FBI leadership that I saw over the past six months is considerably more alarming than anything I saw in the previous 15 odd years of my career or that I'm aware of as a student of US History. So I think there's still a lot of unknowns and a lot of questions that need to be answered about these investigations. I have a little bit of skeptic that they're actually as far along as officials are saying. But, you know, there's a number of questions that Americans should be asking about these before they celebrate them or protest them. There's just a lot of facts that we need to find out that the government needs to explain, including what they're.

[Commentator]

Even about to begin with. Let me go back to your own case because it's so powerful that you wrote this and that you're out here explaining to people who are trying to understand what is happening within the government right now. And I'm not sure exactly what the HR policies are inside the FBI, but are you considering any sort of lawsuit against the agency leadership for your demotion or anything along those lines, or you just really want to be out there helping people understand what's happening more?

[Host]

The latter. And look, I'll be clear. I don't want the rest of my life to be me bemoaning what happened to me at the FBI. I spent a long time working for U.S. national Security and that's, that's really the sort of topics I'D like to focus on as I transition to research and writing. But it is important for the American public to know what's happening at the FBI. And it's important for the FBI workforce to know that some of us who left really do want to still protect them and look out for them. I'm going to be brutally candid here in a way I haven't in any interviews yet. There is a real sense of abandonment and betrayal among the line workforce at so many of the senior executives who've been forced out and have not spoken up about what happened to them.

[Commentator]

That is an incredibly powerful thing to hear, an important thing for people to hear. And I'm grateful that you shared that. And I hope if anybody wants to share their story, they do come out, because you're doing it. Let me ask you, you are about to have your first child, which I promise you will put a lot of this in perspective. As a mother of two, we all think about what kind of a country our children are going to be raised in and what it is. What weighs on you most right now about the world your new child will enter.

[Host]

The callousness of it all. There have always been political differences within the United States. We fought in actual guns and artillery, civil war at one point. We had riots in the streets over the Vietnam war during the 1960s. But there was always a baseline understanding among most people that you could have political differences and still be friends with people. You can have different ideological views based on on your upbringing, your faith, your education. And the fact that somebody differed in those views didn't make them a bad person or somebody not worth caring for. There's a sort of rush to demonize anybody we don't agree with in American society that really discomfits me.

[Commentator]

Michael Feinberg, thank you for having the courage to tell your story, to speak for so many people, as you've reminded us, who don't have a voice, who may say, still be in there, who are looking for somebody to voice what they're experiencing. I really appreciate it. I know people watching are as well.

[Host]

Thank you very much.

[Commentator]

We'll be right back. Two weeks ago, ICE arrested 64 year old Donna Kashanian while she was gardening in her front yard in New Orleans. Plainclothes officers and unmarked pickup trucks surrounded her, handcuffed her and took her away. But her community didn't take that sitting down. While Donna is originally from Iran, she has lived in the United States for 47 years and most of that time in New Orleans. She volunteers to rebuild houses after Hurricane Katrina. She looked after the elderly and cooked for her neighbors. She was on the PTA at her daughter's school. She was a beloved member of the community and her community fought for her. Her family launched a GoFundMe to cover legal fees. They raised more than $50,000. They started a letter writing campaign and got local elected officials involved, specifically writing hundreds of letters to New Orleans Republican Congressman House Majority Leader Steve Scalise. And that pressure appears to have worked. On Monday, after two weeks in federal detention, Donna was released. And the key factor, the thing that Donna's family and lawyer believe was instrumental to getting her out, was the intervention of Republican Congressmen Steve Scalise. Now, I don't bring this up to celebrate Steve Scalise. He just rubber stamped Trump's dangerous agenda by helping push a bill through Congress that would supercharge ICE's ability to arrest more innocent people like Donna all across the country. But I think it's important to pay attention to how pressure from constituents on Republican members of Congress can actually work. Trump's immigration agenda is deeply unpopular. Polling last month from there showed that the majority of the country already thinks ICE has gone too far. Far. All around the country, ICE is already arresting thousands of innocent people like Donna. All of those people have neighbors. All of those neighbors have power over their elected officials if they are willing to use it. That does it for me today. You can catch the show Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern on MSNBC. And don't forget to follow the show on Blue sky, Instagram and TikTok for now. Goodbye from Washington and we'll see you next week. We quilt this city with a comfy roll. Colton. Northern Northern is quilted with three cushy layers for your comfort. Keep it quilted with quilted Northern.