Transcript
Nick Kristof (0:00)
Foreign.
Tim Miller (0:12)
Hello and welcome to the Bulwark Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller. Delighted to welcome back to the show. A columnist for the New York Times, two time winner of the Pulitzer Prize. His latest book, Chasing Hope, is a memoir. He's also the general manager of Christoph Farms in Oregon. He briefly ran for governor of Oregon also in 2022 with a bunch of other stuff. It's Nick Kristof. How you doing, man?
Nick Kristof (0:32)
Hey, good. Good to be with you, Tim.
Tim Miller (0:34)
I'm pumped to talk to you. You were just back from the west bank, so we're gonna get into that and maybe some politics. But obviously I wanna start with the Iran war stuff. I guess I kind of just wanna begin by letting you cook on what you think is the state of play in the Iran war and how you assess where we are today.
Nick Kristof (0:50)
Boy, I mean, well, what a mess. You know, we got into this war unnecessarily and now we' than when we started. You know, we're now trying to get the Strait of Hormuz reopened. And I think it's actually more likely that Iran will end up with nuclear weapons, say, you know, three or five years from now than at the start of the war. Right before the war, Iran was actually offering a pretty good nuclear deal and we turned it down. We're not going to get as good a deal now, I believe. I think Iran is going to try to really hold on to some kind of control over the Strait. And meanwhile, we have spent as much on this war, Tim, enough that we could have provided a free college education to everybody or every family earning $125,000 or less in the country and provided daycare to every three and four year old in the country. And so it is maddening when we do these things that cost lives, have a huge opportunity cost and leave us in a worse strategic position, all because we haven't thought through the consequences.
Tim Miller (2:04)
That's pretty compelling to me. It's kind of like an other than that Mrs. Lincoln Assessment of the Iran war. I want to read this counterpoint. Mark Dubowitz over at FDD has been one of the biggest agitators for the war and supporters of it. And he posted a thread last night that made the case for why things are going so well. I want to go through a little bit of that with you so we can sure hear the other perspective. Number one, nuke programs set back years, enrichment and reprocessing, gutted weaponization sites destroyed. That's number one. Number two, ballistic missile program crippled. Number three, air defense is devastated. Number four, full economic warfare, not just sanctions anymore, but military pressure laid on top with the blockade. Number five, regime decapitation. Number six, the region turning on Iran. Number seven, proxy network shattered. He goes on from there, but that's basically the gist. What would be your counterpoint to what Mark offered there?
