Transcript
Bill Kristol (0:01)
Lowes knows how to help make your home holiday ready for less. Get select Style Selections vinyl flooring for just $1.99 per square foot and have it installed before the festivities begin. Our team can help you every step of the way. See a Lowe's Red Vest associate or visit lowe's.comholidayinstall to get started. Lowe's we help you save basic Install Only Date restrictions apply. Subject to availability. Install by independent contractors. See Associate for details.
Tim Miller (0:28)
Contiguous US Only hey, this is Sarah. Look, I'm standing out front of a.m. p.m. Right now and, well, you're sweet and all, but I found something more fulfilling, even kind of cheesy.
Bill Kristol (0:40)
But I like it.
Tim Miller (0:41)
Sure, you met some of my dietary needs, but they've just got it all. So farewell. Oatmeal so long, you strange soggy.
Bill Kristol (0:49)
Break up with bland breakfast and taste.
Tim Miller (0:51)
AM PM's bacon, egg and cheese biscuit.
LifeLock Advertiser (0:53)
Made with Ktree eggs, smoked bacon and.
Tim Miller (0:55)
Melty cheese on a buttery biscuit. AM PM Too much Good stuff. Hey everybody, I just wanted to talk to me and y' all for a little bit at the start here, and we'll get to Bill Kristol in a minute. There are a lot of things that were making me very angry over the weekend in the fallout from Charlie Kirk's assassination. Among them are the fact that I see almost nobody discussing the gun culture that this young man was steeped in, and that is being ignored and being considered irrelevant to this conversation. For some reason, I'm upset about how stupid the punditry is about the online subculture this killer was steeped in, and we're going to be talking more about that this week. I'm angry about the despicable attacks on trans people, the incitements to civil war I've seen from prominent people on the right Ted Cruz's creepy AI slop tributes to Charlie Kirk RFK claiming Kirk was his soulmate. I could go on. There's a lot pissing me off about how supposedly responsible leaders in the MAGA world have acted, and I'm going to be covering all of that and more on this podcast and in the weeks ahead. And by the way, that's one more thing that I'm angry about that I have to steep myself in this assassination coverage for the foreseeable future. That's something that makes me angry at the killer, frankly. And before we get to all that with Bill Kristol, there's one other thing that I'm really upset about and that really shook me this weekend and I want to talk about that with you. The number of people who I've encountered who told me some variation of Charlie had it coming is deeply, deeply alarming and upsetting. And, and it's something that has really kind of shaken me to my core. And before I talk about those folks, I just want to be clear about who and what I am not talking about. I'm not talking about people who are posting their strongest agreements with Charlie, lifting up his past noxious comments or any of that. It's perfectly appropriate to speak the truth about his role in our national discourse, to express strong disagreement with him with the TPUSA mission. It's a free country, or at least it's supposed to be still. So I have no qualm with folks expressing their political disagreements with him. I'm also not talking about the algorithmically delivered sludge from random strangers that Elon and the Chinese are elevating into my for you page. And I've seen some pretty fucking nasty stuff on there, but I'm not letting that get to me. And I'm not, It's important to say, talking about the Democratic Party or Democratic leaders who have been acting extremely responsibly throughout all of this, at times in contrast to their GOP counterparts and certainly in contrast to how their GOP counterparts acted following the attack on Paul Pelosi and others. So I think that it is important that I distinguish the thing that is upsetting me about some on the left from what is happening in the leadership of the Democratic Party. Because a lot of my criticism of the Republican Party is how leaders responded to pressure from voters that was pushing them in a direction that they knew to be wrong. And so I appreciate the Democratic leaders for acting responsibly over the last few days. But what I am talking about, the thing that is getting me really upset, it's coming from people that are real, that either I know or I know to be not inauthentic. It's coming from people I follow posting things like, hey, fascist, catch, had to unfollow a couple people on that. Coming from people that I follow on Instagram posting pretty gleefully. It's coming from the people that follow the show and comment on our posts at times. And it's coming from people in real life that I met at a bar. That's right. On Friday, I was watching my friend DJ and there was somebody that I've met before but don't really know that well, and they came up to me and apropos of nothing, told me that they have French ancestors and they know what it's like to fight the fascists and they're happy that this fascist is dead. Someone volunteered that to me at the bar and I had a couple other people say something not quite as gross, but close to the same ballpark. I don't know what signals I sent to the universe that led someone to decide that I was a person they should confess that they're pro assassination to. But let me be clear. Don't fucking do that. I consider anyone who is pro assassination of Charlie Kirk a foe. Even if we voted for the same person in the last election. I know we discussed this last week and I know that probably some folks are sick of it. And that's fine. You can fast forward to Bill. But I wanted to one more time explain why this is also important to me. Number one, just fundamentally, this is wrong. I believe that when people ask me about what my ideology is now that I left the Republican Party, I always come back to this one phrase. I believe that people should have an opportunity to live a life of purpose and meaning if they choose to, and that the government should do what it can to foster it and do what it can to protect people from threats to that maybe another way to put it, threats to their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. That's my North Star. And I guess it should go without saying, but I'll say it explicitly, that you can't live a life of purpose and meaning if you get gunned down on a campus. I also think that people should have the chance to grow and change and find that meeting. It's kind of something that I've been thinking about. It's striking that on Friday I had David Frohm on this podcast. Today I had Bill Kristol. And I wonder what some of the people lethally posting about Charlie would have said if one of them had been assassinated 20 years ago. Because it sure seems like some people that like Bill Kristol now would have been at least neutral to that 20 years ago, if recent reactions are any signal. And that's a disturbing thought to have. It's a disturbing thought to have. And let me tell you, I've had a lot of people tell me they thought that they hated Bill Kristol when he was on the Sunday shows. They watched him growing up, or they watched him as they were getting involved, as they were coming into age, into adulthood, and they didn't like his views on a lot of issues. And that because of this podcast and because of other things, they've come to see him for what he is. I mean, it's self deprecating and thoughtful and great father and grandfather and somebody who cares about this country. And I'm not saying that Charlie Kirk was any of that, but I'm just saying that I think that it's important to allow people the space to demonstrate who they are. Allow people the chance to grow and learn and change. Some people change for the worse, some people change for the better. This is part of the human experience. And I would think that people who thought that Bill Kristol was an enemy and have come to find him charming and lovable and thoughtful, might kind of think twice about the one dimensional way in which they view a 31 year old who got assassinated. I'd secondly like to say that even if it wasn't morally reprehensible to support assassination or to give comfort to assassination, it is morally reprehensible. But even if it wasn't, does anybody think that this worked or helped the anti maga or anti fascist cause? If you are that guy at the bar and you think that the right thing to do is to fight and defeat fascism in all its forms, does it seem like that happened over the last week? Because I don't know. I think if you're a real anti fascist, you should be furious at the man that just empowered the fucking fascists. From the LSU game on Saturday where I'd watch a flyover about Charlie Kirk to reports from friends at church services about how priests were talking about Charlie Kirk to the NFL tributes to social media feeds. Charlie Kirk is now a martyr. People who had never heard of Charlie Kirk are now hearing these hagiographies and these tributes to him. People that had never heard of Charlie Kirk. My section around me at Tiger Stadium on Saturday were cheering and whooping and hollering for him. It sure doesn't seem to me like the anti fascist cause was advanced in any way. Then you got Stephen Miller, little golem in the White House talking about how to use this to crack down on anti fascist groups, on liberal groups, on activist groups that are working to oppose the MAGA cause, to advance the progressive agenda. Now the arm of the government is planning on cracking down on them even more. It doesn't seem to me like any anti fascist objective was met this weekend. Seems like the opposite. And how about the trans folks? Do you think that the trans roommate of the shooter thinks that this made their life or the life of trans people safer or better? Because I fucking don't. I really worry for the safety of that person. For their future. I worry for all of trans folks right now. I think that we are already in an ugly period for them, and I think that it's about to get worse. And while TPUSA was definitely hostile to trans Americans, I don't think that what happened in Utah is going to do anything to make their lives better. Doesn't fucking seem like it to me, at least. The other political thing about this that makes me think about is last year when people were asking me, like, where we're going, I said, one of my worries that we're going to a place similar to in Ireland with the troubles. Like, not that we have a real civil war, but there'd be just spates of violence, of political violence cropping up in this country. And a lot of times this was before Trump had won again. In my head, I was envisioning, I don't know, Kamala Harris being president and that there would be spates of MAGA violence and domestic terrorism. And obviously we've seen some of that. Still, I guess the worst case scenario I can think of is a world where the MAGA nationalists are in charge, the fascists are in charge, and there are spates of anti fascist violence martyring them and empowering them further and creating a cycle that allows them to use their power to crack down even more. That seems like the worst possible case scenario. It seems like there's some people out there on the activist left that want to careen us towards that. Maybe not that many people, but too many people for comfort. One more thing about why this has hit me so hard. I genuinely believe what I say on this podcast, which is why you're getting this rant. I genuinely believe all the reasons that I've given you about why I left the gop, why I upended my life, why I thought that the illiberalism of Donald Trump was such a threat to the country. I'm never offering arguments here as opposed or as some kind of, you know, triple bank shot, clever way to get back at maga. I'm not pretend, I don't pretend to have used like. I oppose illiberalism in all its forms. I oppose the violent rhetoric that Donald Trump reinserted into our politics. I oppose the ill treatment of political foes and the dehumanization of political foes that he advanced. I oppose the way in which they want to take away the rights of political enemies. None of this is a pose or positioning. When I oppose illiberalism coming from Trump, I'm not going to then flip around the other side and say, I love or I defend or I understand illiberalism from the other side. Let me just give you a specific example. There's the case of Kilmar Brego Garcia this year. It's something that I was really upset about and talked about a lot. This notion that somebody could have their life taken from them, that they could be grabbed and sent to a foreign torture prison without due process just because the government or some people in the government did not like what he stood for. On the right, there was a big conversation on Fox and other places among Republican politicians that I found disgusting about how well Kilmer Garcia beat his wife or whatever. He was a trafficker, he sold drugs, he was a drug dealer. And what I would say to that is, okay, prove it. Prove it. Take him to court. We have a rule of law in this country. If that is true, then find legal remedies for dealing with this problem like we do in a liberal democracy. We within the construct of a liberal democratic system of the rule of law of a democracy, you can't just say, that guy's a wife beater, so I get to send him to a torture prison camp. You have to prove it. You have to go to a jury. You have to prosecute him. Whether or not he's a bad person or whether or not he's a person that's done bad things is irrelevant to an autocrat wanting to snuff out his rights. And in some cases, if people hadn't objected, if Kivo hadn't pushed back, Republicans and MAGA and Donald Trump was happy to essentially end Kilmar Garcia's life at the time, nobody had gotten out of Sukkot. It was pressure from the courts, pressure from lawyers, pressure from activists, pressure from the media, pressure from politicians that led him to be able to get his day in court. And this is all still ongoing. This is a fight that's still ongoing. My point is, it was like it didn't. What I said at that time is it didn't matter whether I disagreed with his behavior. He still needed to be treated as a human who has rights in this country. Everybody on the left that I could see fully agreed with that argument. That was an argument a lot of people advanced, Right? So it's hard for me to understand how you could say, unless you were faking it, right? Unless you could say, if you said, I believe that somebody that allegedly beat his wife and sold drugs and trafficked people should not have their rights taken away from them, should not be sent to a torture prison Then I don't understand how you can flip it around and say, well, I don't care that much if somebody with bad opinions got killed, got assassinated. That doesn't work for me. The inverse of that. That doesn't. That doesn't compute. Okay. Like, Charlie Kirk had a lot of opinions I disagreed with. We argued all the time. I would go every, every Christmas, I went and argued with people at his TPUSA function and we met and we would talk and, and argue and, and tease each other. He had bad opinions. Some. Some real ones. We live in a country where people are allowed to have bad opinions freely and where they do not need to be afraid. They should not be afraid that somebody will do a summary execution on them because they didn't like their opinions. So for me, these liberal democratic principles that applied to Kumar Abrego Garcia also apply in spades to Charlie Kirk. And I gotta tell you, I don't think you are a liberal. You might say you're a liberal, but I don't think you're a liberal if you're a neutral on the topic of stochastic political terrorism. All right? And I don't think that you're in the pro democracy. No, let me correct that. I know you're not in the pro democracy coalition if you are neutral on someone getting murdered while practicing open debate. Being for liberal democracy means standing up for the rule of law. Standing up for people to have the ability to express their views in public on a college campus, even if their views are noxious, even if you disagree stridently with their views, even if you think that their views are a plague on the country and the youth. It doesn't matter. Being for democracy means you are for their ability to express them and that you will push back on them in the public square. You will try to push back on them at the ballot box. You will encourage people to go out and vote against that worldview. That is what being in the pro democracy coalition is. And frankly, if you want to really define yourself as being pro democracy, it is especially true, especially true that people who have views you disagree with are protected, that they are safe to express them. As you can tell, this is something that I care very deeply about. It is, frankly, at the core of why this exists, why this project exists, why this bulwark exists. Because my outrage and horror at Trumpian illiberalism is what made me decide that I need to speak out against it and act out against it and organize against it. At the time I was considering maybe I just quit politics and I don't know, go be a PR guy for a corporate law firm or something. Or a corporate, you know, some company's pr, ma'.
