Loading summary
Rocket Money Advertiser
Five years ago, I was paying $65 a month for my subscriptions. Today, those Same subscriptions cost $111, and I don't even use half of them anymore. That's why now I use Rocket Money to manage my subscriptions for me. The app gives you a list of all of your subscriptions and reminds you of upcoming payments so you're not hit with any surprise charges. On top of that, it also sends you alerts when subscription prices go up, so you always know the price you're paying. If you decide you no longer want a subscription, you can cancel it right from the app. No customer service needed. And the the best part is, Rocket Money even reaches out and tries to get you refunded for some of the money you lost. On average, people that cancel their subscriptions with rocket money save $378 a year. And overall, Rocket Money has saved its members $880 million in canceled subscriptions. Stop wasting money on things you don't use. Go to rocketmoney.com cancel to get started, that's rocketmoney.com cancel rocketmoney.com cancel.
Teddi Mellencamp
This is Teddi Mellencamp from Two Teas in a Pod with Teddi Mellencamp and Tamara Judge. There's the new season of 90 Day the Single Life, and it's hotter than ever. If you've never seen 90 day before, this is the one that will get you hooked. Their marriages crumbled. Now eight singles are taking the lead and stepping back out to the scariest place of all. The dating world. There will be exciting first dates, steamy hookups, big letdowns, and potential love waiting in the most unexpected places. Don't miss a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, Monday at 8 on TLC.
Tim Miller
Hello and welcome to the Bulwark Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller. Delighted to welcome back to the show and opinion columnist for the not so failing New York Times. Compared to the competitor. He's also the co host of the legal podcast Advisory Opinions. It's David French. How you doing, sir?
David French
Tim, great to see you. Great to see you. And I'm so thankful we're not so failing in this business, Tim. My goodness.
Tim Miller
Yeah. If you are gonna go woke, go mainstream, you know, and leave your conservative media purchase for an actual business, you picked. You picked the better one, it appears.
David French
Yeah, I mean, I, you know, it's just sad. I mean, it's. It's just really sad. The idea that you're going to heal your institution by cutting out the. Your reporters in A war zone. I know that war reporting, for example, is extremely expensive and quite often not enough people read it. Right.
Tim Miller
Yeah.
David French
But we. How do you. This is absolutely vital. And we're now leaving it in the hands of, you know, we're doing a great job over there. The Wall Street Journal's had a lot of great resources, but I don't think enough people understand sort of how the entire news gathering, global news gathering enterprise is now hanging on just a very few institutions right now, us, the BBC. I mean, there's just not very many.
Tim Miller
Yeah, yeah.
David French
Anyway, I know that's not what we're going to focus on today.
Tim Miller
We've covered that pretty well yesterday with Marty Baron. I want to start with you in an area of expertise which is praying. There was a prayer breakfast yesterday. Donald Trump, the president. I'm just picking a few choice things. He called Thomas Massie a moron. He said that Biden was the worst president we ever had. And Biden had no idea that he was president. Biden's watching right now. He has no idea where he is. He praised the El Salvador gulag policy. Bukele spoke earlier. And he painted his authoritarianism as a fight against Satan. Trump closed out by saying, I don't know how any person of faith can vote Democrat. I really don't. And he also vamped a bit about how he should probably make it to heaven. He's not a perfect candidate, but he did a hell of a lot of good for perfect people. So there was the prayer breakfast summary for you.
David French
So the only bright spot in all of that is when he said that Democrats couldn't be a person of faith, couldn't be a Democrat. There was a minor rustle of disapproval. Tim. That's probably the biggest pushback he's gotten from a conservative religious audience in a decade.
Tim Miller
Wow.
David French
But you know, thank goodness for small victories. A minor rustle of discontent within religious circles for him, I mean. Well, within conservative religious circles. But the. It's a joke. It's ridiculous. I mean, at some point, you know, I almost feel like he's going to say to sort of conservative religious organizations, I've been punking you this whole time to see how much you will debase yourself for access to power. What will you not overlook? I've just been pushing this just to see. It's a social experiment. How bad can I be from the standpoint of traditional Christian values and positions? I mean, this is a person who turned the Republican Party decisively from long standing pro life platform. You know, his administration has approved the abortion pill, generic version of the abortion pill. And he's just constantly, just exposing the total hypocrisy of conservative evangelicals over character. Just every day. Just every single day. And, you know, it's just a push and a push this idea anymore that he is actually for religious liberty as opposed to only the religious liberty of his allies or for free speech as opposed to only the free speech of his allies. You know, at some point you just have to say, it's just very clear. There's no line. And then he goes and keeps pushing further and further, you know, with a video I'm sure we want to talk about that he posted.
Tim Miller
Oh, yeah, we're going to get to the video. Just. It was. This was so on the nose. I thought it was a spoof. There was one of the aforementioned conservative evangelical commentators and allies of Trump posted yesterday asking if anyone had briefed Trump that the prayer breakfast was a prayer breakfast.
David French
It's a prayer.
Tim Miller
It's kind of like it's there in the name. I don't know that we can blame this one on the staffing. I think. I know we're desperate to always find the bad advice Trump gave to explain away his behavior, but I don't know. I don't know that that's apartment in this case.
David French
Yeah, I mean, this is sort of the ultimate example of Trump can't fail. He can only be failed because it is, it is now a staffer's job to fully explain that the National Prayer Breakfast is in fact the National Prayer Breakfast. That has to be now explained. And it's somebody's fault that that was not explained. It. You feel like you're being punked by this. You know, that there's just no capacity to see him and to view him in any way with the same metrics, the same evaluations that they apply to everybody else in the world. It's just remarkable. It's just remarkable. And it's not new. There's nothing about this. This new. There's. Except for maybe the video. There's nothing about this that's even escalatory. It's not worse rhetoric than he's engaged in before. It's just a constant reaffirmation. He just shoves your moral compromise in your face every day.
Tim Miller
Well, you've mentioned it, so I guess we should, we should go to this next. Donald Trump was bleeding last night a lot. Lot of posts, I guess having trouble sleeping. You know, maybe it's the Peptides. One of the videos that he posted included a short section that had pictures of the Obamas as monkeys.
David French
Right.
Tim Miller
And this was at the end of a longer video. The screenshot was obviously going around because it's just so nauseating and noxious and racist and horrible every word. But I was wondering to myself, I was like, so what was this part? What was he posting that this was part of? So, you know, I ventured over to truth social media, clicked on the full video. Do you know what the actual video was about?
David French
It's a conspiracy.
Tim Miller
It was about the Dominion voting machine.
Teddi Mellencamp
Yeah.
Tim Miller
I swear to God, the President was posting about the Dominion voting machines cheating and getting Biden to win. And at the end of that video, there is, like, some bonus, you know, coverage where they're making fun of Democrats and includes pictures of the Obamas as monkeys. And so, like, it is all of Trump's just perniciousness wrapped up in one post.
David French
You know, here's best case scenario, Tim. Here's best case scenario. If you want to, like, put on how can I possibly defend Donald Trump? It is this.
Tim Miller
And people will be doing that over on Fox today, so you might as well.
David French
Yeah, yeah. Here's your talking footage.
Tim Miller
Let's see. Let's spitball.
David French
While posting my deranged conspiracy theory video, I inadvertently include footage that I had not viewed till the end. My deepest apologies. That's best case. You can't back away from. He intentionally posted the deranged conspiracy theory. So that's just there. That's baked in his best. His best possible case is he just didn't post it without watching all of it.
Tim Miller
Well, I've got some bad news for you on the best case, because the White House has put out a statement. Oh, here we go. And the statement did not say that. The statement did not say my apologies or the President didn't see that. You know, he should be more judicious in the future about his rebleats. Like, that was not the statement. The statement was, calm down, fake news media. This meme was part of a larger video, which was a Lion King parody where Trump is the king of the jungle and his opponents are animals. They pointed out that in the video, Hillary Clinton is also a boar and Hakeem Jeffries is a meerkat, and the Obamas are monkeys. So that the defense is that the President was posting about his political enemies as fast animals and monkeys.
David French
Yeah, yeah. And intentionally posting about our political enemies as animals. Michelle and Barack Obama were, what, randomly selected to be. I mean, this again, I just said punking you. He is just absolutely shoving your moral compromise in your face every single day. And he's giving you no room, I mean, no reasonable room at all, to sort of wriggle out of it, to say, well, there was some way, if you squint this way or that way, that everything's okay. He's just shoving it in your face.
Tim Miller
Yeah. And he's been doing it for 20 years or longer. I guess you go back to the Central Park Five, but with the Obamas, you almost hate to do this, but it's like. And folks have chosen this. I mean, to me, when we get you and I and others get smeared about Trump derangement syndrome and all that, it's like when somebody shows you who they are, you can believe them originally, and you can just make a decision in the original moment when Donald Trump was the leading purveyor of a racist conspiracy theory about the first black president, that a person that was going to be spearheading that effort does not have the character to be president. And I think that that was like a statement that a lot of Trump supporters would have agreed with in 2013.
David French
Yeah, right. Yeah, absolutely.
Tim Miller
But then once you make the moral compromise, you're like, well, I guess, you know, then it's hard to then put up future guardrails. And so you end up with this.
David French
You know, I also think that what has happened and the reason why he is able to do whatever he wants at this point and the reason why, you know, you're looking at things that if he had done this at 2016, probably, maybe, I don't know. I mean, the Access Hollywood tape came out. I mean, who knows?
Tim Miller
I don't know.
David French
Who knows? I mean, what am I saying? Who the heck knows?
Tim Miller
But nothing would have ended him. But here's what would have happened in 2016. There would have been at least some people speaking out about it. Right. People do remember, like, we've gone through this, like, slow debasing and slow accommodation. I mean, Paul Ryan was the speaker of the House and was not a profound courage to my standing. Did I live up to what I would have wanted from him? But, like, for two years, he would put out statements criticizing Trump. You know, Mike Johnson is obvious. You know, there's none of that now.
David French
Yeah, yeah. And so I think what is important for. For people to start doing now is to begin in your minds to separate MAGA and Trump. And here's what I mean by that. There are millions of Americans, sadly, who will see nothing wrong with that video, be glad it's out there, are happy to make liberals as angry as they can possibly make them, even if they're not hopelessly racist themselves. There is a category of Americans we now know that's larger than we thought, that relishes in this kind of cruelty. But there's a lot of other Republicans that, no, they don't relish in this kind of cruelty at all. But they've been through so much with Trump. They sort of feel like that they have been through all of this together. And I think that people are on the outside looking in. They really underestimate the bonding power of feeling like you've stuck with it when everyone's against you. And so it becomes a kind of. It's almost part of your identity, the Trump support. The Trump support becomes a matter almost of identity. It's unshakable. We've been through this together. I've been through him, through this and this and this. But with maga, there isn't that same kind of personal loyalty. There's no that kind of personal loyalty to a J.D. vance, to, you name the MAGA politician. There's not that kind of bond. There's nothing like that. And so that's why I think you consistently see MAGA politicians underperforming Trump. They just don't have that same sort of sense of shared identity and community and bond that you specifically have been through this with him, and you don't have that with these other politicians. And so I'm going to be very interested. And I think the Trump approval rating is still a rough proxy for where we are, But I'm beginning to think that maybe the Trump approval rating is overestimating actually Republican support because it's including within it sort of that cohort of Republicans are just going to be with Trump. Right?
Tim Miller
Yeah.
David French
And so this might be a partial explanation for what that Texas Senate flip, which was so dramatic. It was so dramatic. Much more. It was beyond the state Senate.
Tim Miller
We were just.
David French
The state Senate.
Tim Miller
We've been talking about the Senate primary, too, but the state senator.
David French
Yeah, sorry, State Senate. Be very clear about that. It was so dramatic. Why do you get so dramatic in a Republican district with these Trump approval ratings? And I think there might be a gap, an emerging gap between the continued loyalty to Trump and the loyalty to maga.
Tim Miller
You know, not to get too high on opium, but it's a Friday. I do think there's also a potential.
David French
I do like to get high on opium.
Tim Miller
Yeah. There's a little death spiral element potentially to it, too, because you could imagine Those MAGA politicians, J.D. vance, already seen this from J.D. vance feeling like they can win those voters over by being more extreme, right? Not by like dialing back on Trump, but by doing the stuff that he kind of says with a wink and instead saying it with a straight face. And you do wonder if that then ends up kind of helping them solidify that core base of people that relish this that you mentioned earlier, but continues to cause bleeding among other folks. Hope can spring eternal on that. I have a question for you about Obama. You know, you don't want to be responsive to every racist thing Trump does. And it's like, don't let Trump dictate your life and don't go out there and put out some whatever statement about, you know, whatever. I'm not sure that, like, the Obama choice, though, to just like appear once a year on a panel is right for our current moment. And I don't know what you think about that, but I do think that they're like, Democrats could use somebody who is a capable messenger to kind of engage from time to time on stuff and raise the salience of stuff. And I think that he has an audience and some loyalty with some people that ended up voting for Trump. And there's all the famous Obama Trump voters. I don't know, maybe that's wrong. But I just look at this today and I'm like, it feels like he could be more useful in the fray and I feel like he might be abiding by some mores that are a little out of date, but I'm guessing you might be on the other side of that. So what do you think? I.
David French
Honestly, Tim, I'm on the fence about this and I'll tell you sort of what pushes me one way and what pushes me the other. I mean, I know for a fact that there's sort of a sense amongst former politicians, including ex presidents, that in reality, when people like you and me say you need to get out there more, the reality is that the sum total of the demand for their voice is actually the chattering class, that, that they don't have that ability that they used to have because they don't have any future potential power. Their time has come and gone. And yes, they absolutely have loyal supporters and friends and all of that to a degree that you and I will never experience and all of those things. But as far as their ability to move the needle, they're also keenly aware that sometimes it accompanies a backlash, that if you're in an anti establishment age and the old establishment comes forward, are you going to do more harm than good. And so I think there's a lot of back and forth, but I do think one thing that they're right about is that people like us tend to dramatically overestimate the ability of an Obama or a Bush to move the needle, and that we often tend to dramatically overestimate the ability of senators and congressmen to move the needle unless they're actually exercising their power. So, like, for example, Republican senators would say to you, we could all speak out against Trump and it would destroy us all.
Tim Miller
Sure.
David French
At the same time, they could have voted against Trump in the impeachment trial and destroyed Trump's career. So the actual influence of a member of Congress or senator, you know, a member of the House or the Senate is their exercise of power, not their moral voice in the world, because they just don't really have that. And I think that as this era has gone on, that's why I tend to focus more on what are you doing as opposed to what are you saying? Because that's where these politicians can actually achieve something in the real world.
Tim Miller
That's well put. I guess then, as a communications person, I would say that you can do some things, you can nudge some people. So then maybe it's just a point of personal privilege to the buses and Obamas when you do decide to say something. One of the Clintons as well, the screenshot phone statement that is like three pages long, that seems like it was written by four staffers. If they could just stop doing that, I would just like, just like Malia and Sasha to teach him to go pick up his phone and be like, trump's a dick, and then put it down. You know, unfortunately, that's kind of more effective at this time. It might feel a little unpresidential, but I don't know.
David French
Here's where I come down. I think on this, maybe where they're going to be most effective is where they also have some of their most experience and where a lot of their relationships still matter. And that would be something like, let's say, a Barack Obama getting off the sidelines on a specific issue fight. Like, we're going to talk about something later in the podcast, a legal proposal that I have to try to help rein in federal abuses. You know, if you had a. An Obama and, you know, a Bush working the phones or going out and saying this, this is something that, in my experience as president is necessary to restore the health and integrity of the executive branch. In other words, you've got somebody who's a former president. Saying, look. And on the phone with existing allies, people who you can still raise money for, for example, and say, look, this is something that will actually matter. And it matters so much, I'm willing to sort of come out of, you know, the hibernation period to emphasize that it really matters.
Tim Miller
Yeah, sure.
David French
So I don't know, we're all, I mean, we're spitballing here because we're all in uncharted waters. None of us have confronted this kind of situation before.
Tim Miller
Every group has someone who insists on doing things the hard way. In my group, that's my friend Blake. That friend's still paying for a subscription. They forgot they had the one refusing to update their phone because it still works. And now the one who's somehow still overpaying for Wireless in 2026. Mint Mobile is here to help with that last one. Stop paying way too much for wireless just because that's how it's always been. Mint Mobile exists to fix that. Same coverage, same speed, just without the inflated price tag. And for a limited time, get 50% off. There are three six or 12 month plans of unlimited premium wireless. You can bring your own phone number and activate with ESIM in minutes and start saving immediately. No long term contracts, no hassle. This has been something, you know, the parents at school are already starting to talk about what to do for the kids, you know, when they can get their phone. I'm a little ways away, thank God. But this is kind of plan, something to think about if you got a teenager, good deal, you know, they don't need the high price plan. All right, or get the deal for yourself. Either way, Mint Mobile, I'd look into it. Ready to stop paying more than you already have to? New customers can make the switch today and for a limited time get unlimited premium wireless for just 15 bucks a month. Switch now@mintmobile.com bulwark that's mintmobile.com bulwark upfront payment of 45 bucks for three months, 90 bucks for six months or 180 bucks for a 12 month plan required. $15 a month equivalent taxes and fees extra initial plan is term only. Over 50 gigs may slow when the network is busy. Capable device required. Availability, speed and coverage varies. Additional terms apply cmit mobile.com for details. Let's just talk about the exercise of power for a second because there's a specific example of this that was profiled in the New York Times this week that I want to chew over with you because I have a natural emotional reaction to it, that it's Hostile, but then you start to think about the considerations and what is actually best. So let's talk about Katie Britt as a case study here. There's a New York Times profile on her. The premise of it is that she was very struck and moved by the plight of Liam Ramos, a five year old boy that was detained and sent to Texas. And in the Times article, they said this through a series of interviews and emotional moments at her home. Ms. Brett offered a rare look at how one Republican lawmaker is navigating Trump. She seldom challenges him. When she does, she believes that to be effective, any outrage must be felt quietly. Any response conducted through back channeled phone calls and peppered with words of admiration for him. I said I was gonna run for the Senate to be the voice or the voiceless, and I mean it. She had tears in her eyes. I'm sorry, I just keep thinking about that child. And she basically talks about how she worked some back channels with Kristi Noem with regards to that case. And I look at that, I'm like, on the one hand, it's like, great, good. I mean, I'm glad somebody's trying to help that kid. Okay. On the other hand, it's like, well, there are two ways to think about your exercise of power as a senator. One is back channel relationships with Trump where you're kind of no different than one of his buddies at Mar A Lago. And another exercise of power is actually passing laws that constrain his excesses. And Katie Britt supported everything that led to Liam Ramos being detained. And they now have a big debate coming up in the next two weeks where they could change the rules to make it so that there are rules around detention for, you know, children, rules around detention for people who are not convicted criminals or who do not have whatever. You know, there are a lot of different potential ways they could, they could design it. So what did you make of that story?
David French
Okay, I've got a charitable and an uncharitable take. Tim.
Tim Miller
Okay, I want the uncharitable, so give me the uncharitable first. Let me get the uncharitable.
David French
The uncharitable take is. Good Lord. The idea that of all of the things, you know, it begins to feel as if, you know, you've got a situation where Trump gives you off ramp after off ramp after off ramp after off ramp. And, you know, you drive by 10, 15, 20 exits from Trumpism, and then finally you flip on the blinker very tentatively, you know, and, and you say, wait, hold on, why now? Why this, you know, what is it about now? And this is it that it actually, something actually penetrated that sort of through the haze of. Because you have to realize that red state senators have red state staff, they have red state constituents. They're in the red bubble of information. A lot of the scandals that they read, they get.
Tim Miller
Yeah, that's true, but they're also college. I look, the college educated chamber of commerce crowd in Alabama is pretty mixed.
David French
Oh, I know.
Tim Miller
Like everywhere, even in Alabama. You know, it's not as if Katie Britt is like deep in a bubble in rural Alabama or she's only getting Newsmax and the Facebook memes, you know.
David French
But you are living in a culture that is reflexively defensive and extremely familiar immediately with defensive arguments. And so. So you're just marinating in that. What actually happened here is that something penetrated through those defenses finally, or the downward arcing of the poles rendered your defenses more vulnerable. Okay, so is this. Which of these two. So that's the uncharitable.
Tim Miller
The uncharitable is that Republicans broadly are seeing that the way that ICE has been behaving in Minnesota is just resoundingly unpopular and that they need. They're looking for ways to protect themselves politically. And it's as simple as that.
David French
Yeah, the charitable take is different things hit different people at different times. You know, like Liz Cheney was with Trump big time for a long time, and then 2020 rolls around, 2021 rolls around, and she's off the bus. And there she had a lot of opportunities to get off the bus before. But I think, obviously, and to her credit, the efforts to steal the election really breaks through. So different things break through at different times. And we should welcome that. We should welcome that. Because part of me is very keenly aware that when somebody starts to raise an objection to Trump in that world, they immediately start to lose almost everything that really matters. Like in your life, you start to lose your church community, you start to lose your friendships, you start to get family turning against you. And so in those circumstances, the worst thing I think for us to do just from a human standpoint and also from just practical standpoint, is to look at somebody who's in the midst of a crumbling community because they're doing the right thing, however late it might be. And then go, where you been? As opposed to come here, you know, come here, I'm going to give you a big hug. This is a place where you can feel comfortable because we're going to be defending the values that you've always said you've upheld. And so I'm very much in the camp of when the crack opens, when their eyes seem to open, whether it's tactical or true, like, come here. Come on in. Come on in. The door is wide open. I've got a casserole in the oven for you. Here's some sweet tea.
Tim Miller
I'm not a casserole fan, but okay, I hear you. We're doing. We've got some king cake for you. It's Mardi Gras season. I'm with you in the principle. I'm skeptical that that's what's happening with Katie Britt. And here's the good news. We'll get to see. We've got two weeks. We got two weeks to learn. They extended the DHS funding two weeks. She is the chairman of the committee that oversees the relevant budget, and she has an opportunity to make some changes here because I think that there's another sort of aphorism that comes to mind here, which is a little bit of put up or shut up, you know, which is like, I will welcome you. I'm gonna welcome you. That's great. But I don't, like, don't cry about how bad it is and then do nothing and then want a pat on the back for that, you know, and so I would love it. We've asked Senator Britt to come on in good faith. I would like to hear what they would like to do and change this stuff. I really care about, like, I think that the policies have been horrible. You know, maybe some people didn't see what this was gonna look like. That was a mistake. But that's okay. We all make mistakes, but we've all seen it now. And so it's like, this is their opportunity to change the rules, and they need to do it or else they're complicit. Because, frankly, as it is right now, they're responsible for what happened to Ramos, not anybody else. Trump, too, but they gave the budget for this.
David French
And here's the thing, Tim, you're talking about. We're seeing things. What we're seeing in the streets. We are getting good visibility on that because thank goodness people have phones everywhere. So if someone says you can't or shouldn't film law enforcement, that's fundamentally false. You can. You should. But we don't have great visibility into what's happening in these detention centers. And the visibility that we do have is really. It's really grim and bad when we get more complete information about what we're doing. And let's just keep in mind here. These are supposed to be civil proceedings. These are not criminal proceedings. A deportation is not a criminal conviction. These are civilization proceedings, not criminal. And we're treating them in ways that are worse than we treat felons in this convicted felon. So it's a civil proceeding. Illegal entry isn't a felony. It's a misdemeanor level crime. If you overstay a visa, that's not even illegal entry. You haven't even committed a crime. When you over, you can be deported. But so think about the brutal treatment of people not even in non criminal proceedings, much less refugees who are being detained for days, sometimes weeks to quote, reevaluate them in these brutal conditions. I mean, Tim, this is literally a moment that your grandchildren will say, how did we let this happen? Great grandchildren will say, I cannot believe this happened. You know, that's the magnitude here. We see with our own eyes incredible brutality. But we also know that there is additional brutality happening out of view. And when that is fully exposed, we are already in a state of national shame and that shame will just deepen.
Tim Miller
That's a great point. And by the way, there are detention centers in Alabama that she could be visiting. There are detention centers here in Louisiana. It's hard for some. Democrats have been able to get in Chris Murphy and Julian Castro, the one in Texas, we've been able to get some visibility into the one outside of San Antonio. But a lot of these detention centers, they've been blocking people like elected officials from trying to get in.
Rocket Money Advertiser
The number one resolution for people last year was to save more money, but nearly half gave up by February. Don't let that be you. Download Rocket Money to reach your financial goals this year. Track your spending, cut waste and automate savings in one simple app. Rocket Money shows you all your expenses and categorizes them so you know exactly where your money's going and where you're overspending. From there, the app cuts waste by canceling your unused subscriptions and lowering your bills. No customer service needed. With that money freed up, the app will automatically set some cash aside for your goals. Whether it's an emergency fund, paying off debt or saving for vacation, Rocket Money's got you covered. Users love the app with over 186,000 five star ratings. And on average, users can save up to $740 a year. When using all the app's premium features make saving money a priority this year. Go to rocketmoney.com cancel to get started. That's rocketmoney.com cancel rocket money.com cancel.
Teddi Mellencamp
This is Teddy Mellencamp from Two Teas in a Pod with Teddy Mellencamp and Tamara Judge. All right, lovers and dreamers, buckle up because there's a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, and it's hotter than ever. If you've never seen 90 day before, this is the one that will get you hooked. Their marriages crumbled. Now eight singles are taking the leap and stepping back out to the scariest place of all, the dating world. There will be exciting first dates, steamy hookups, big letdowns, and potential love waiting in the most unexpected places. After Sophie's recent divorce, she's moving on to see if there's potential with a Dominican hottie. Some of you may know Pedro Gino has a full inbox of DMS and is trying for a second chance with one that got away. And after Courtney's unexpected romance with Colt, find out if his history of cheating will come back to bite the relationship for good. Get ready for the season's hottest romance series full of surprises, sparks and connections. Don't miss a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, Monday at 8 on TLC.
Tim Miller
Among the other things, just as you give these examples of things that are happening a little bit away from view, that it's kind of harder to grasp on. Whatever things happening, just a couple of stories I wanted to mention. Godfrey Wade is a Jamaican born veteran. He served in the military for eight years. He's been in the US for more than 50 years. He's facing imminent deportation to Jamaica. He's been in ICE custody for five months. It's like, why did we have to keep a veteran in custody for five months? Even if you're going to deport him, which I'm not for. But if there's a legal rationale for it, you know, okay, we can fight that out in the next ballot box. But like, there is no rationale for detaining a veteran of our military for eight years who has no criminal record for five months in these disgusting ICE detention centers. There's no rationale for it. When I was on that jubilee year, I was debating the MAGA kids. One was like, what are we supposed to do? Just knock on the door and say, hey, Mr. Illegal, you have to leave in a month? And I was like, yeah, that's exactly what you should do for Godfrey Wade.
David French
Send him a letter and then it's a civil proceeding. It's civil. It's not criminal. Yeah.
Tim Miller
Anyway, so that's a veteran. We're doing that too. I don't know if you saw this story. I've been wanting to get to it all week. You remember that raid in Chicago? You're in Chicago right now, where they rappelled onto a building like we were in Fallujah, and there's the helicopter, and we stormed into the building with guns. And what we were told at the time was that that was like a Trenda Aragua hot spots or something, and that the guy that owned the building had told the government that, like, he can't get these gang members out of the building. So we were told, it turns out that, like, there was just another scam happening where some guy was. Was taking people's rent and not telling them that. That he was not the owner of the building. And so the owner of the building was mad at that guy. So anyway, they end up doing, like, a military intervention of this building where they, like, bring out a lot of citizens. A lot of black citizens live there, and then a lot of Venezuelans who were there under the tps, not Trendo Aragua. And this story interviewing all these people were like, we were treated like animals. Like, we were scared to death. We had children.
David French
To get rid of squatters. Yeah.
Tim Miller
Get rid of squatters. Seriously. To get rid of squatters.
David French
Yeah, Yeah. I mean, Tim, here's. Here's what's very important for people to understand. There's been a lot of plaudits given to Trump for closing the southern border, that he. He's gotten the southern border under control.
Tim Miller
Yeah.
David French
And to some extent, you know, there are things that he's done that are to his credit on that point. But another part of this is the brutality here is part of that process, because the brutality and this brutal treatment is a means of telling the rest of the world, stay away from here. Look what we'll do to you. And I think that not enough people have really focused on that, that the brutality is actually part of the border control. And now some MAGA listeners. I don't know how many MAGA listeners you might have, Tim. Maybe a few hate listeners. I don't know.
Tim Miller
A few hate listeners for sure. And I just saw a comment on YouTube I was very excited about from a woman who said that she used to listen to Matt Walsh and ended up down a reverse radicalization pipeline. She saw me on some other. Some show I did with Emily Jasinski, who I like, who's conservative, you know. Emily. Yeah. And now she's watch. So you never know. That's a brave world out there on YouTube. Some people could have fallen Asleep, and the algorithm send them to us and they wake back up. Next thing you know, they got, they got David French, so you can speak to them.
David French
They're out there.
Tim Miller
There you go.
David French
But there are some MAGA listeners who'd say, yeah, yeah, absolutely. This is, this is the whole deal. This is what it takes. This is deterrence. We're restoring deterrence or whatever. And so, you know, I, I think the brutality is in many ways inseparable from the larger strategy. And, you know, that's, that's a very important thing for people to realize. And, and so, you know, when this moment ends, God willing, that it ends, that we, we're, you know, we're not in this kind of permanent deep polarization. But, but let's just, let's assume, for the sake of argument, it's going to end when this moment ends. There's going to be an absolute crying need for legitimate, real immigration reform so that, that we're not see sawing every four years between the whim of various presidents and where one is irresponsible in one direction and the other one is utterly, grotesquely brutal in the other. And this is why you have to have a functioning Congress. I mean, I'm always going to go back to that.
Tim Miller
Well, let's go to an example. You wrote in a column today of something that Congress could do. Maybe we could forward this on also to Senator Britt's office as something they could review as part of this DHS negotiation that's happening over the next few weeks. The story originated. I'll give people the backstory, and then you kind of take what you think is a good solution. There's a letter sent an email by a Pennsylvania resident named John, and he wrote to a federal prosecutor named Joseph Durnbach urging leniency for an immigrant who is facing deportation back to Afghanistan. Was a very friendly note. Within hours, John received notice that DHS had issued a subpoena to Google to compel the company to release information about his account. Then, days later, a police officer and two Homeland Security investigators showed up at his house to question him about the email. An absolutely insane story. Again, these kinds of things, we don't even have full visibility into everything that's happening, but I want you to talk about that and also some proposed remedies.
David French
So what we have here is something that you would really read about in totalitarian societies. It's something that, you know, interestingly, like J.D. vance, remember at the start of the. This term, he went to Europe and lectured Europeans about free speech violations and there was, you know, some coverage of the way the United Kingdom has legitimately gone off the rails on free speech. Like, I am not going to defend the UK's free speech regime, but in many ways, a version of this where there's surveillance, and if somebody says something that is subjectively deemed out of line by state authorities, there's going to be state, immediate state intervention. And this is like from a college bias response team fever dream, except instead of, like, some activist undergrads and an administrator showing up at your door, it is federal agents. And this is just the tip of the iceberg on the way. The federal government under Trump has been explicitly attacking and chilling the exercise of constitutional rights, much less the basic human rights violations we're seeing in the streets. Right. And so, you know, there's a lot of reform proposals here for this. And, you know, you've seen that the Democrats have come out with a, you know, X number of point plan about eyes with masks and, you know, dealing with masks and body cameras and all of this stuff. And I'm like, guys, these are just pin pricks. The real problem that we have is that if you have a president of the United States, like we have here, who will use the pardon power the way he uses the pardon power to excuse even violence on his behalf, and you have the legal structure we have now where federal officers have immunity from civil liability that state and local officers do not enjoy, then what you have is total federal impunity. You have federal impunity in the administration of law. Trump can do what he wants. His federal officers can do what he wants. And so if you're just going at masks, yeah, that matters. That that's not irrelevant. It's not a tiny thing. But in the scope of things, it's a small thing. And here's the big thing. If you want to hold people accountable, we know exactly how to do it. It's not perfect. It has holes. It has gaps. But apply the same standards to federal officers that apply to state and local officers and that allow citizens to sue for violations of constitutional rights. And if you can prove that a clearly established right was violated, you will recover money compensation or punitive damages. And so the issue here, from the.
Tim Miller
Government or from the person?
David French
Well, it depends. Then the liability is individual. Yeah, the liability is against the person. Now, the government could potentially choose to indemnify, but what we are talking about is the potential of imposing individual liability.
Tim Miller
Good.
David French
And here's the interesting quirk about this. The president's pardon power applies only to crimes it does not apply to civil liability judgments. So the President may be able to keep you out of prison by pardoning you if you violate the civil rights of another citizen. But if you violate their civil rights and you're held liable in civil court, the president can't pardon that judgment. So he can keep you out of prison, he cannot keep you out of bankruptcy court. And I spent most of my time in law practice suing state and local officials over constitutional violations. And I know for an absolute fact that big liability judgments are a deterrent. They are. Universities change their behavior in response to liability judgments, that police departments change policies in response to liability judgments. And this matters. And it is bizarre to me, Tim, and I think it's a legacy of the fact that historically, in the balance between the federal and the state government, the state governments have been the primary threat to liberty in the United States. Think slavery, Jim Crow. But it's flipped. It's flipped. And the federal government right now is the primary threat to liberty. And because of the web of immunities it's created for itself, there's no accountability. And so the law I'm saying that should pass is just five words. It's five words that change the meaning of one law, 42 USC Section 1983, that allows me to sue the federal, the state and local government authorities when they violate the Constitution. It's not creating special burdens on the federal government, it's giving them the same burdens, same legal liabilities that apply to other parts of the government. And that would be a massive legal reform that would have radiating positive effects not just in the Trump administration, but for a generation to come. So to me, it's a no brainer.
Tim Miller
Yeah. And Democrats should feel comfortable with this. Think about things that flipped. I've always been kind of uncomfortable with unnecessary litigiousness like over litigiousness. And found myself when I was back when I was working in Republican politics, being drawn to more of the tort reform side of things, creating rules to make it harder to sue. And it was a lot of times then the Democrats who are more in favor of types of laws like this would encourage, you know, that would allow for lawsuits to give people protections. That is kind of flipped as well. Like Republicans recognize the power of this. And if you look at just two things that come straight to mind now, you mentioned this, the so called don't say gay bill in Florida that was then copied in other places, and the abortion bounty law in Texas, it was civil liability. That was the cudgel that they Used in both of those. Right. Like, the idea was that schools would just stop, you know, including whatever the gay Penguin book in their library, because they were afraid that they might get sued, you know, by Moms for Liberty. And so, like, that was the enforcement mechanism essentially for that bill. And so, you know, there are ways to do this improperly and, you know, we'd have to work through all of that in the future. Yeah, but just recognizing that that's a powerful tool is something obviously that the right has grabbed onto recently. And so it makes sense that the Democrats should fight back on that ground.
David French
Well, you know, here's why I think it's possible to pass, if not right now, because I'm not naive. I don't think it's just going to pass right now, but at some point in the future, until three minutes ago, this was very much a Republican position. And one of the reasons why it's very much a Republican position, Libertarian leaning Republican position. There are different factions, as we all know, but. And one of the reasons is the Obama administration during the Tea Party targeting scandal, it became very clear to a lot of the Tea Party groups, and I represented dozens of them, that federal immunities made it very, very difficult to sue the federal government and to achieve any kind of meaningful result. It was a huge hurdle. These federal immunities were a huge hurdle when there was evidence that the IRS had explicitly engaged in ideological targeting and its nonprofit approval process. And so. And also years and years and years of left wing violations of civil liberties in universities had also led a lot of conservatives to say we need fewer immunities for all government officials, whether, you know, including state and local. And then I saw an interesting chart. Tim, this is going to tell you what you need to know about why the Republican Party has flipped against governmental accountability. There was an interesting chart. It was based on data from FIRE foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Full disclosure, I was president of fire 20 plus years ago. And they track censorship on campus. And they track it from. Does it come from the left or does it come from the right? And there was a chart online that showed that even five years ago, the vast majority of campus censorship was coming from the left around 21 22, right about the point of the rise of sort of the CRT panic. The lines crossed. And now the right is far more likely to censor even on college campuses than the left. And so is it any wonder? And then we're seeing systemic constitutional violations in the streets. We're seeing systemic constitutional violations against other, against universities, against law firms, you name it. Is it any shock that suddenly the Republican Party is less interested in government accountability? But it's still. It's still somewhere in there. It's still somewhere in there. And I think there's hope.
Rocket Money Advertiser
I didn't realize I was wasting $415 a month until I downloaded Rocket Money. I thought I had my finances under control until the app laid out all my spending and categorized it for me. Takeout shopping and unused subscriptions were quietly draining my account, and as a result, my savings took a backseat. But Rocket Money doesn't just tell you what you're wasting money on, it takes action to save you money. First, the app looks at your income and monthly expenses and calculates how much you can safely spend each day to stay under budget. Rocket Money also fines and cancels unwanted subscriptions for you, and even negotiates better rates on your bills so you have more money in your pocket. On average, Rocket Money members can save up to $740 a year when using all the app's premium features. Users love the app with over 186,000 five star ratings, it's time to simplify your finances and take control of your Money. Go to RocketMoney.com Cancel to get started, that's RocketMoney.com Cancel RocketMoney.com Cancel.
Teddi Mellencamp
This is Teddi Mellencamp from Two Teas in a Pod with Teddi Mellencamp and Tamara Judge. All right, lovers and dreamers, buckle up because there's a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, and it's hotter than ever. If you've never seen 90 day before, this is the one that will get you hooked. Their marriages crumbled. Now eight singles are taking the leap and stepping back out to the scariest place of all, the dating world. There will be exciting first dates, steamy hookups, big letdowns, and potential love waiting in the most unexpected places. After Sophie's recent divorce, she's moving on to see if there's potential with a Dominican hottie that some of you may know. Pedro Gino has a full inbox of DMs and is trying for a second chance with one that got away. And after Courtney's unexpected romance with Colt, find out if his history of cheating will come back to bite the relationship for good. Get ready for the season's hottest romance series full of surprises, sparks and connections. Don't miss a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, Monday at 8 on TLC.
Tim Miller
The underlying problem here? The feds feeling like they can act with impunity and immunity on all of these things does take us a little bit back to the Supreme Court decision about Trump's immunity. And I'm wondering what your current thinking is on that ruling.
David French
Well, I've always hated it from day one. From minute one, when I realized what it was saying, I hated it. But it's also been misconstrued. It is not actually holding that the president can do whatever he wants in office and he's immune. That is not, you know, when he's exercising power within his core executive functions, he's immune. But the thing that's weird about the case, and this is what's difficult about it, is that not everything he does officially does he receive immunity for. But the line is so unclear of where it is and where it isn't that you can read the whole opinion and you'll have a conflicting notion of whether it covers bribery. You just don't know the answer to it. Now, what's very clear, this is a.
Tim Miller
Pretty relevant matter since he seems to be getting bribed a lot.
David French
Yeah. When you've got people who've pumped vast amounts of money into your family's holdings and then you give them a pardon, it raises an eyebrow. So I think it's a bad decision. That was. And anytime you're going to read the decision and not really know, clearly, is bribery going to. Can you prosecute a president for bribery, then it's a poorly drafted decision. But it is not an absolute blanket waiver of all, you know, potential criminal accountability for a president.
Tim Miller
While we're on scotus, a couple other SCOTUS stuff. They upheld the California redistricting this week, which is pretty noteworthy. They're MIA on the tariffs. There's a lot of folks kind of expecting that they might have, I don't know what the correct, you know, what the appropriate term is, whether, you know, they use their secret docket or the winter docket for that. But they seem to be in no hurry to deal with the tariff decision.
David French
That's an interesting one.
Tim Miller
Yeah.
David French
So I, I broadly agree with this, but I'm. But I only shakily, broadly agree with this. And that is that the longer we go without an opinion that the more likely it is that the tariffs are being upheld. Because one of the problems is, what do you do if you strike down the tariffs? Does that mean that the treasury now has to repay all the money that it took in?
Tim Miller
Right.
David French
And that is a lot of money. And that amount of money is building day by day by day. And so part of me is Wondering, okay, wait a minute. If they're going to overrule the tariffs, the potential financial cost of that is escalating at a remarkable rate. Right. And so. Huh. Or it could mean that, you know, look, you've got a lot of concurrences and dissents and you've got all this flying back and forth and it's just not ready yet. So it's all speculation. But every week that passes, I'm more worried that they're going to uphold the tariffs. And that's just based on nothing but exactly the speculation I just shared with you.
Tim Miller
I want to just go back to Minnesota for one second. Another story that I've just not had a chance to get to this week that was extremely remarkable is the story of this woman, Julie Lee, I believe you pronounce her name, Julie Lee. She was working as an attorney in DHS and gets moved over to doj and she is in court in Minnesota and getting upbraided by a judge who's like, you guys are not following any of our rulings. Like, dozens of examples of people that judges have said should not be in detention that are still in detention. And she basically like, has a, like, melts down in court and is like, fine, hold me in contempt. I would like to be in contempt. I need a good night of sleep. Like, put me in jail for the night so I can get a good night of sleep. And as you learn more about her story, Chris Guider at Law Dork did a good backstory on this. We'll put the link in the show notes. But basically like, she saw her job as, like, I'm going to do as best as I can to get justice for some of these people that are wrongly detained. And I'm quitting this job. And you know, just in the meantime, I'm going to do anything that I can, which is pretty admirable. That story is happening simultaneously to the story that in the Minneapolis district, 75% of the prosecutors have quit. It's in the district they're struggling to find people to do the job, to represent the government in these cases because the demands are so contrary to what folks feel like is in their integrity and what folks feel like is the law.
David French
When I saw today reports are bringing in military lawyers, JAG officers to try to fill in the gap. And let me tell you, they're not.
Tim Miller
I thought they fired all the JAG officers. Well, just maybe that's why they need something to do.
David French
The very tip of the spear, you know, the JAG generals. But they they're bringing in JAG officers and they're not trained for these cases. I mean, yeah, you do quick refresher courses and you try to brush up on your way in, but they're not trained in this. She wasn't trained in this. And to just put this in perspective, when you see people leaving a U.S. attorney's office, for example, I want to put this in perspective for people who don't know much about sort of the culture of law practice. These are some of the most coveted jobs in the practice of law. Being an Assistant U.S. attorney is an absolutely coveted job. It is extremely competitive. You're not generally waltzing out of law school into the U.S. attorney's office. You got to show you got to prove yourself and in your private practice before you're going to be seriously considered, especially for the most elite offices. Now we're seeing, you know, there was what a former DOJ official was advertising on Twitter, hey, apply to be an ausa. That's mind blowing. That's mind blowing.
Tim Miller
Yeah. Just, just to add one line on that. Apply to be an AUSA if you support the. Executing the Trump agenda. Yeah. So, like, we're not looking for the best people. We're just looking for, for hacks.
David French
Yeah. What a meritocracy we have now, Tim.
Tim Miller
Yeah.
David French
Bringing in a bunch of lawyers who've not practiced in the area, pulling in military lawyers. Yeah. Just thank the Lord that they've done away with DEI and we're now in the world where the best rise to the top. But with each one of these Trump scandals, it's a layer upon layer. So you look at what's happening in the streets, and that's brutal and that's horrible. And then you look at what's happening in detention centers, and it's brutal and it's horrible. And then you look at what's happening to the Department of Justice and you realize that there's generational damage being done to the infrastructure in the doj. And, you know, I was on a one year reflection podcast with my friends at the Dispatch, and then we were talking about a couple aspects of Trumpism. One is a lot of what he's done is vaporware. That in other words, it's just a bunch of executive orders that the next president can come in and undo, but the damage from the vaporware will radiate for years. Even if you elect somebody who can walk in tomorrow, undo all of the Trump executive orders, you're going to still have a hollowed out doj. You're going to still have. A lot of the new career highs are second rate MAGA lawyers whose chief qualification is ideological commitment to Donald Trump. That's what you're going to inherit. And broken and damaged institutions.
Tim Miller
Just like. Yeah, just as an example of that, I was thinking about this the other day. What about Warsh? What do you do with warsh? Do you fire the Fed chair who came in on an obviously corrupt deal.
David French
You'Re not going to be able to do?
Tim Miller
Or do you feel like that?
David French
Yeah, with Warsh, you're not going to be. Because in the Cook case, I think the Supreme Court's going to be like 9,081 leave these guys alone once they're confirmed.
Tim Miller
So no, I mean, that's structural and in some level, sure you'll be able to hire new AUSAs, but man, the career roles in a lot of these other spots, it's going to be tough. Like the FBI. And that Time story a couple weeks ago ago about the FBI, it was like 40 some odd FBI officials and they were like explaining what they used to do and how they got pushed out. And that's a type of expertise that is very challenging to replace.
Rocket Money Advertiser
Five years ago, I was paying $65 a month for my subscriptions. Today, those Same subscriptions cost $111 and I don't even use half of them anymore. That's why now I use Rocket Money to manage my subscriptions for me. The app gives you a list of all of your subscriptions and reminds you of upcoming payments so you're not prize charges. On top of that, it also sends you alerts when subscription prices go up, so you always know the price you're paying. If you decide you no longer want a subscription, you can cancel it right from the app. No customer service needed. And the best part is, Rocket Money even reaches out and tries to get you refunded for some of the money you lost. On average, people that cancel their subscriptions with rocket money save $378 a year. And overall, Rocket Money has saved its members $880 million in canceled subscriptions. Stop wasting money on things you don't use. Go to rocketmoney.com cancel to get started. That's rocketmoney.com cancel rocketmoney.com cancel.
Teddi Mellencamp
This is Teddi Mellencamp from Two Teas in a Pod with Teddy Mellencamp and Tamara Judge. All right, lovers and dreamers, buckle up because there's a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, and it's hotter than ever. If you've never seen 90 day before, this is the one that will get you hooked up. Their marriages crumbled. Now eight singles are taking the leap and stepping back out to the scariest place of all, the dating world. There will be exciting first dates, steamy hookups, big letdowns, and potential love waiting in the most unexpected places. After Sophie's recent divorce, she's moving on to see if there's potential with a Dominican hottie. Some of you may know Pedro Gino has a full inbox of DMs and is trying for a second chance with one that got away. And after Courtney's unexpected romance with Colt, find out if his history of cheating will come back to bite the relationship for good. Get ready for the season's hottest romance series full of surprises, sparks and connections. Don't miss a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, Monday at 8 on TLC.
Tim Miller
Okay, there's our legal and immigration briefing. That's uplifting. I got. Before I get to the super bowl, we're kind of running out of time. I wanted to pick your brain both on trad culture and on your article about liberalism and reflecting on what if you're wrong. Which one of those dealer's choice do you want to do? We can do the other one the next time you're on trad culture or liberalism. What would you like to.
David French
Well, we got the trad culture. A little trad culture story going on right now. So you guys have been covering that.
Tim Miller
The short of the liberalism column. People should read it. I'll put in the show notes. It's like, hey, maybe reflect on the fact that you're not right about everything. Yeah, it's good for everybody to do. I'm working on that myself. It's a challenge. All right, Trav culture, you wrote this. Me and the and Sam Stein and Will Sommer did a video last night breaking down this insane story among tr. You know, right wing TR tried, which is short for like trad Catholic or trad even joker, like traditionalist religious folks. And there is, there's just, there's a lot of craziness. I mean, there's, there's cheating, you know, accusations being thrown around left and right. You can go watch that. Yeah, you can go watch that video. But it has led to kind of some discourse around this where even, you know, some on the trad right who ostensibly are authentic in their views are saying that, that we're being made to look bad by these new influencers who are just. Who just like the aesthetics of like the dad having muscles and being in Charge and the mom being, you know, dressed up like a 50s housewife. And they like the aesthetics more than they like the actual policy. And you wrote this even when they're not sexually libertine. A lot of this trad culture embodies the works of the flesh from Galatians 5. Hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions and factions. So talk about that a little bit.
David French
Yeah, that was a very popular tweet, Tim.
Tim Miller
Was it?
David French
Yeah, yeah, I thought it was. I thought it was quality content. Well, here's what I mean. And Tim, I'm sure you've seen this. You know, I prefaced it by saying a lot of this trad culture stuff is really libertine. And actually it's covering up for a lot of libertinism. And so you see a lot of sexual scandals and sort of in this subculture. But when I say libertinism, I'm just talking about sexuality. I'm talking about how culturally a lot of the post liberals, the new Christian right, really on the one hand, proclaim that they're upholding core Christian values. At the same time, they really indulge and relish in some really grotesque sins, including, you remember the old against David Frenchism nonsense from like seven years ago?
Tim Miller
Yeah, Sohra, by the way, I thought we were winning him back over. He, one of the key players of his against David Frenchism was starting to kind of see the light, it seems like, and now has had a full snapback and was like gleeful in the murder of Alex Preddy. So, you know, I think it's a good shorthand for me. As we said earlier, we welcome all people who want to convert, but anyone who is active and against Frenchism I think is a good shorthand for thinking that that's somebody who doesn't have good judgment.
David French
But you know, one of the things in there, and a lot of these post liberals live this out every day, is the statement, I believe it was something along the lines of civility and decency are second order values. In other words, you know, when the stakes are high enough, you can be really indecent to other people, you can be very uncivil and you can be cruel, just cruel. And, and so what you see a lot of the libertinism of the post liberal world in the trad world is cruelty is manifested in indulging what libertinism is really indulging your sort of your basis desires and then rationalizing and justifying. Like a lot of us mess up and we make mistakes and but we recognize that that is, that's wrong. We apologize, we repent, we do better. Libertines don't do that. They take something that is wrong and they relish it. They love it, they indulge in it. And that's what you see in a lot of the trad and post liberal world. Even if they're not involved in the hypocritical stuff, scandals, they are very openly, joyfully, gleefully cruel, vicious, deceptive, dishonest in their interactions with people. And that's what I mean by it. And the proof is just everywhere around you all the time.
Tim Miller
Yeah, I like that though. Galatians 5JVL did a article about the Beatitudes this week and yeah, I had a similar reaction to yours. People don't really like getting the Beatitudes and then Galatians thrown in their face. But it is what it is. Just is what it is. It is what it is. It is right there and folks can interpret it ways that they feel is appropriate for their own integrity. Speaking of trad culture, we have a Super bowl halftime show coming up this week. Bad Bunny is there. They had a Green Day. I've heard some rumors about some guests. That should be fun. And Franklin Graham, evangelical leader, posted this about the halftime show. Like most Americans, I've enjoyed watching the Super Bowl. But halftime shows began pushing moral boundaries and have become more and more sexualized. This year they're having Bad Bunny perform. The NFL leadership is pushing the sexualized agenda. Thank you TPUSA and Mrs. Erica Kirk for providing an alternative the All American Halftime show with the agenda of celebrating faith, family and freedom. Headlining the All America Halftime show is Kid Rock, just an exemplar of traditional values. I have a game for you. I want to play a game. Should we go straight into the game or do you have any Kid Rock thoughts? Franklin Graham Thoughts first, let me just.
David French
Say this about Franklin Graham. Franklin Graham wrote an op ed during the Clinton era saying adultery disqualified Bill Clinton. When the Stormy Daniels stuff came out, he said, that's just between Trump and his wife. And then when Pete Buttigieg ran for president, he said, we can't have a gay man be president. So the Franklin Graham moral ethos here seems to be pretty clear. Which is, if you're left leaning and you're violating Christian morals and standards, well, you have no business in power. If you're right leaning and you violate Christian morals and standards, well, whose business is that of yours, Tim? So anyway, that's the background. I wrote that up once and the American Family association launched a petition drive against me.
Tim Miller
Why? What was their complaint?
David French
My yellow journalism, Tim.
Tim Miller
Did they object to any of the facts? No, no, no, no. You're yellow. You're yellow. You are yellow.
David French
I attacked Franklin Graham, Tim. It's just. You can't do that.
Tim Miller
Here's a fun game. It's inspired by Billy Eichner's Billy on the street show. And it's called Kid Rock or Bad Bunny. And I'm going to read you some lyrics, and you're going to guess whether the lyric is from Kid Rock and his traditional mores or whether it's from Bad Bunny and his sexualized anti Americanism. Okay, here's first. Young ladies. Young ladies. I like him underage. See, Some call it statutory. I say it's mandatory.
David French
Yeah, that's Kid Rock. I know that one.
Tim Miller
That's Kid Rock. Very. In the spirit of the Jeffrey Epstein moment, I would say here's another one for you. She opened up wide and put balls in her mouth. Next, the cutie started rubbing my back. She put her finger right between my booty crack. So I grabbed her wrist quick and said, hold up, slut. Ain't nobody sticking nothing in my butt. Do you think that's Kid Rock or bad?
David French
So why are you doing this?
Tim Miller
There's only two more.
David French
I mean, I'm gonna just go ahead and guess it's Kid Rock.
Tim Miller
It is Kid Rock. Yeah. Okay.
David French
Okay, okay, okay.
Tim Miller
Here we go. That also doesn't seem to be traditional Christian mores, but we're still going. Maybe this next one is a little bit more appropriate for Franklin Graham. Here we go. I pull them young, Start fucking with their virgin minds. I give a fuck about your. Okay. That ends with, I'll fuck you blind, bitch. Yeah, that's Kid Rock. All right. Okay, last one. Last one for you. Ready? No, actually, C. Te quieres devertier con encanto y contrimore solo tiennes que vivir un verano un Nueva York. Nueva York. Who do you think that would be?
David French
Okay, you're baiting me into saying it's Bad Bunny.
Tim Miller
That is Bad Bunny. No, that is Bad Bunny. Kid Rock cannot speak Spanish. That is translated. If you want to have fun with charm and delight, you just have to live a summer in New York. New York. Which feels so.
David French
Tim, One thing I've learned from this is the next time I'm on here and you say to me at the end, we're gonna play a game. I'm gonna respond, we are not. We are not going to Play a game.
Tim Miller
I apologize to Nancy for making him go through that, but you know, I had to have some fun on a Friday. All right. You got a Super bowl pick for us. You gotta pick anything, you know, Only.
David French
Because Minnesota Vikings fans for some reason have been sentenced to eternal cosmic suffering. I think that Sam Darnold is going to be their super bowl winning quarterback and they're going to be looking at that, at him hosting the trophy. And you know it. With him, the Seahawks hosting the trophy and them looking at their young quarterback that they gave him up for, who is not appearing to be like the. I'm rooting for him. I really am. I'm rooting for him. But it's looking like a bust maybe.
Tim Miller
Yeah.
David French
So I think it's because the universe hates the Vikings. It's going to be the Seahawks.
Tim Miller
Yeah, I agree with you. But I've got some good news for Vikings fans. I'm wrong a lot. So betting against me is a good bet. So maybe the Patriots will win. And my other good news is if I'm right, I'm going to be. We're going to be in Minneapolis. Not David French, but your bullock friends. Unless you want to come. Do you want to come to our Minneapolis live show February 18th and 19th?
David French
It sounds fantastic, but I'm going to be in Miami on those days.
Tim Miller
Oh, okay. Well, I think I got the better of that deal. We'll be with the Vikings fans in Minneapolis. We got a couple of tickets. Tickets left for the 18th show, so it's going to sell out probably this weekend. So go check it out. The bulwark.com events. David French. Sorry about the game.
David French
Thank you, Tim,?.
Tim Miller
I appreciate you, man. We'll see you back here soon. Everybody else will be back Monday with Bill Crystal. Peace. The Bulwark Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.
David French
Hey, it's Ryan Seacrest for Albertsons and Safeway. Are you feeling those winter blues?
Tim Miller
Well, do not worry.
David French
They've got you covered with ways to boost your mood. Add a little sweetness to your day with big savings on all your favorite sweets. Shop in store or online and save on items like Gummy Savers. Five Flavors, Reese's Peanut Butter Cup Sour Patch Watermelon, M M's Party Size Stand Up Bags and Ferrero Rocher Mixed Variety squares. Offer ends February 24th. Restrictions apply. Offers may vary. Visit albertsons or safeway.com for more details. Are you a fraud? Paying American 1 in 4 taxpaying Americans has been a victim of identity fraud with Lifelock, if your identity is stolen, they fix it guaranteed or your money back. Last year billions in refunds were stolen. Could be from your salary, overtime or second job gone. But this year you don't need to stay a victim because this tax season fraud paying American is something no American should have to claim. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com iheart Terms apply.
Teddi Mellencamp
This is Teddi Mellencamp from Two Teas in a Pod with Teddi Mellencamp and Tamara Judge. There's a new season of 90 Day the Single Life. And it's hotter than ever. If you've never seen 90 day before, this is the one that will get you hooked. Their marriages crumbled. Now eight singles are taking the lead and stepping back out to the scariest place of all, the dating world. There will be exciting first dates, steamy hookups, big letdowns and potential love waiting in the most unexpected places. Don't miss a new season of 90 Day the Single Life, Monday at 8 on TLC.
Date: February 6, 2026
Host: Tim Miller
Guest: David French (New York Times columnist, co-host of Advisory Opinions podcast)
This episode features Tim Miller in conversation with David French as they dissect the state of American political and moral life under a second Trump administration. The discussion zeroes in on the normalization and escalation of cruelty and lawlessness—particularly regarding immigration policy, the erosion of institutional norms, and the complicity of political, religious, and legal actors. French also offers legal analysis and reform proposals to address the dangerous growth of federal impunity. The episode ends with a less-than-flattering look at “trad culture” and a tongue-in-cheek game about the Super Bowl halftime show.
"At some point, you just have to say, it's very clear. There's no line. He just keeps pushing further and further..." (04:29)
“He is just absolutely shoving your moral compromise in your face every single day. He's giving you no reasonable room at all to sort of wriggle out of it…” (09:43)
"It's almost part of your identity…with MAGA [politicians], there isn’t that same kind of personal loyalty." (12:38)
“You drive by 10, 15, 20 exits from Trumpism, and then finally you flip on the blinker...Why now? Why this?” (23:45)
“Different things hit different people at different times...when the crack opens...come here, come on in.” (25:24)
“I will welcome you. That's great. But don’t cry about how bad it is and then do nothing and want a pat on the back.” (27:11)
“The brutality is actually part of border control. Not enough people have focused on that—the brutality is part of deterrence.” (35:17)
“We're treating them in ways worse than we treat convicted felons.” (28:32)
“If you want to hold people accountable…apply the same standards to federal officers as to state/local…and that would be a massive legal reform.” (42:21)
“The federal government has become the primary threat to liberty…and because of the web of immunities it's created for itself, there’s no accountability.” (41:46)
“Anytime you're going to read the decision and not really know…can you prosecute a president for bribery, then it's a poorly drafted decision.” (50:07)
“A lot of this trad culture stuff is really libertine. When I say libertinism…I’m talking about how a lot of the new Christian right, even as they proclaim upholding core Christian values, really indulge in some really grotesque sins…cruelty is manifested in indulging your basest desires and then rationalizing and justifying.” (61:06)
“Civility and decency are not ‘second-order values’—you can't be really indecent or cruel just because you think the stakes are high enough.” (62:21)
“If you’re left-leaning and violate Christian morals, you’re unfit for power. If you're right-leaning and do the same, well, whose business is it?” (64:46)
On Trump’s Religious Supporters:
“I've been punking you this whole time to see how much you will debase yourself for access to power. What will you not overlook?”
— David French (04:19)
On Defensive Rhetoric:
“It’s now a staffer’s job to explain that the National Prayer Breakfast is a prayer breakfast. You feel like you’re being punked…”
— David French (06:22)
On ‘Trad’ Cruelty:
“A lot of this trad culture embodies the works of the flesh from Galatians 5: hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, and factions.”
— David French (61:01)
On the Moral Legacy of Detention:
“I mean, Tim, this is literally a moment your grandchildren will say, how did we let this happen?”
— David French (29:31)
This summary provides a comprehensive understanding of the episode’s key themes, insights, and memorable moments. It serves both as a reference and as an accessible entry point for those who haven’t listened.