Transcript
Tim Miller (0:00)
Hey, everybody. We're going deep in the scenes from Chicago with Jacob Soboroff today, who's been on the ground doing amazing reporting. But I wanted to also hit on a couple of news items this morning. The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Maria Machado, noticeably not Donald Trump. She received it for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela, which is in contrast with bombing people from Venezuela and also in contrast with sending people from Venezuela to foreign gulags. So you can maybe see why her resume was a little bit better. So congratulations to Maria Machado. It's a tough break for Mr. Trump who really, really wanted one more trophy. Man wants trophies more than a five year old. I gotta tell you, my daughter, God love her this last year, two years ago. So either age 5 or 6 demanded to do track because she wanted a medal so badly. Did track is fast. Got two medals this year when we asked her if she wanted to do track. Nope, didn't want to. No box was checked. And that is, I feel like that's the depth, the same depth at which Donald Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize. It's like the way that a five year old wants a medal is how is how Donald Trump wants the Nobel Peace Prize, but he hasn't received it yet. So maybe they'll keep him on good behavior up until 2026. Fingers crossed on that. In I think the more significant news from last night, New York Attorney General Tish James was indicted on charges of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. Was indicted by a federal grand jury in Virginia, which is worth noting. This is about the second mortgage that she had on a home in Norfolk. We've been covering this, this guy, Bill Pulte, who, you know, there's a random apparatchik that in the housing, one of the housing departments has decided to, you know, try to go after all of Trump's foes and dig deep in any resistance figures, mortgage history. And so this is what he came up with. It is worth reminding you, reminding us that, that the U.S. attorney for that district, Eric Siebert, who is a Trump appointee, left his post after deciding that he was not going to succumb to the pressure to indict James and Comey. And he has been replaced by a hack with no prosecution experience. So we'll see how things go forth of this. You know, part of this is, you know, the punishment is the indictment in some cases. And I think Donald Trump really wants to see some of his foes go to jail. For sure. I think he would take a lot of glee out of that. But the punishment is the hassle, the cost, the embarrassment, the chilling effect on other people. Right. Like that is what they're trying to do here. I don't think that anybody suspects there'll be a lengthy prison sentence for someone based on their mortgage paperwork, which I can't even weigh in on the merits of whether or not there's even any there there. But I think that the direct effort by the government to target people personally from the top because they are political foes, and to do so after a public directive, it should have been private directive, but it was, was. It was intended to be a private directive rather, but it was a public directive from the President to the Attorney General that the Department of Justice go after his political foes for ticky tack shit. It is new, it is chilling and alarming, and it is. And it is a place that we really haven't been before. And I think that I saw some discussion on this, I'm sure you guys did, about how maybe this isn't that different. Right. Because Tish James did go after Trump on, I don't think it's fair to say, a relatively ticky tack charge after saying that she was going to go after Trump. I mean, this was something that we talked about a lot here at the Bulwark during that period between 2020 and 2024, that the January 6 charges were very serious against Trump. They the classified documents charges, very serious against Trump. The charges in New York were less so. Right. And, and so, you know, you saw some people, I even saw on CNN last night, some, you know, neutral pundits being like, well, you know, just is what's good for the goose is good for the gander, et cetera. And it's like, well, this is actually, no, a completely different story. This is the President of the United States directing the power of the Justice Department to go after his political foes widely.
