Loading summary
Transcript127 lines
- [00:00]
Unknown Speaker
Foreign.
- [00:08]
Tim Miller
Hello, and welcome to the Bulwark Podcast. I'm your host, Tim Miller. Many of you have been asking, what can I do? What can I do? All right, in segment two, we're going to talk about a tangible thing I think people should be looking at doing to combat Trump's threats to our Democratic republic. But up first, former chief White House correspondent for cnn. He's now an independent journalist and host of the Jim Acosta show on Substack. It's Jim Acosta. How you doing, bro?
- [00:34]
Jim Acosta
Hey, Tim. Good to see you again.
- [00:35]
Tim Miller
Good to see you, too. For our audience's benefit, you know, every once in a while, I like to give them a reprieve. I'm not playing any clips from last night's presidential address. You know, having to hear the voice. It was an interminable 1 hour and 40 minutes. I fell asleep. I'm just gonna be honest. I fell asleep. I dozed off before I even made it to the Ukraine section. I am kind of at the view that these things, even when it's not Trump, are basically pointless in the modern era, and they have very little impact. So I'm wondering what your assessment is of that and if there's anything you saw last night that you think might. Might matter, even on the margins.
- [01:09]
Jim Acosta
Yeah, I did a substack right after the speech was over with Michael Fanone, and Mike says to me, he goes, jim, I love you, but fuck you for making me watch that. And I said, that's fair. I said, honestly, that's fair. I mean, it was a bullshit of palooza, you know, he. I mean, this is what we expect from Trump now. And I kind of agree with you, Tim. I think this thing has just turned into you, you know, hee haw. I mean, I think the next president would be well served to just do it from the Oval Office. Or, like, what did they say in the olden days? You would just, like, send a letter down. Send a letter on a horse down Pennsylvania, you know?
- [01:43]
Tim Miller
Yeah, just send the letter. That's where I'm at. It kind of annoys me. I don't know, this is maybe a meta commentary about the media, but just like, the pomp and circumstance of it all, I mean, we're here in Trump 2.0. I mean, he didn't obviously respect any of the traditions.
- [02:01]
Jim Acosta
Right.
- [02:02]
Tim Miller
You know, at any point. So, like, why should we continue to have respect for it? It's like, oh, and they're kind of. There's the first lady, and she looks beautiful today. And here comes the Cabinet. I Don't know. The whole thing is just kind of like, to me, it's like this is from another era and it's a fake. It feels fake.
- [02:17]
Jim Acosta
I guess it is. And I loved hearing from the people last night who were saying, can you believe Congressman Greene and what he did? And, you know, after Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert and their antics from what, last year or the year before every year, for that matter. And Joe Wilson, you lie from when Obama was president. I mean, honestly, when Donald Trump is up there and he's referring to Elizabeth Warren as Pocahontas, why is anybody getting their knickers in a bunch over, you know, what the decorum is of this ceremony? It's just complete bedlam at this point.
- [02:48]
Tim Miller
Right. This is where I'm on Fetterman side. I'm a rare person on the Fetterman side. I'm like, just wear sweatpants to the program if this is what you're going to do. No sense putting on your suit for this. Okay. There are a couple of minor things I think that is just worth mentioning because they could have some impact. Trump said that Elon Musk, his shadow president, heads up Doge. And then there was a big, well, very lengthy applause on the Republican side for Elon, who kind of stood above, like, Evita waving down on everybody. There's already been a filing with the court about this because, as you know, the White House technically says that Amy Gleason, a woman that lives in Tennessee, is really running Doge. And so, again, I think they're possibly making themselves vulnerable to legal ramifications as far as getting these cuts through. So maybe a minor impact in that last night. I don't know. What'd you think about that? And Elon, broadly.
- [03:45]
Jim Acosta
Yeah. This is like the usual suspects. Who is Kaiser Soze and who is this lady from Tennessee that's heading up Do? I mean, but this just goes to. And I, you know, Tim, I saw this the first time around when I covered Trump and Trump 1.0. I mean, you know, one of the things that folks should keep in mind as a saving grace in all of this, a silver lining, is the sheer incompetence that the Trump team brings to just about everything that they do. And the Doge project is no different. I mean, yes, it's led by the world's richest man, and he's, you know, he's built these successful companies to some extent. And, you know, but at the same time, look at when they put this wall of receipts up on the website. And David Fernhold over the New York Times is picking them off one by one. Nope, that one's not true. That one's exaggerated. They counted this one three times. You know, it's sort of like your uncle, where you have to. Everything he says you have to divide by six. I mean, that is. That is the Trump administration and that's Donald Trump. It all flows from him. The bullshit flows down from him. And everybody, you know, does what he does. It starts at the top.
- [04:45]
Tim Miller
Yeah, there's a little more legal news on this, but just a couple other things in the speech. The thing that did strike me before I dozed off was no economy. Focus. Literally. I keep literally. This is not an exaggeration. This is not the Joe Biden use of literally. He literally spent more time on trans youth sports. Whatever you think about that issue, he spent more seconds speaking about that than he spoke about cost of living issues. He had somebody in the crowd who was kind of hit in the head by a trans volleyball player, I guess. You know, he had. Riley Gaines was in the crowd. He's talking about trans for a while, and then, like, he quickly pivots to the economy, and he's like, joe Biden really fouled up the economy. Right. And then he was moving straight on to Gulf of America. I mean, he barely talked about it. And I thought that was pretty telling, since that is, like, I think his most real vulnerability at this point.
- [05:33]
Jim Acosta
Yeah. And, Tim, I mean, the takeaway, I woke up with this thought this morning, and that is, you know, he never really is going to be the president for all of us. He's never really going to be the president for all Americans. And, you know, I've made a few wisecracks at the top of this, but I'll get serious here for moment, because I know, Tim, you care about this, too. You worked on behalf of Jon Huntsman, who was a serious Republican back in the day. And, you know, it's a real damn shame what has happened to the Republican Party. They're standing up and applauding, taking Greenland from Denmark. They're standing up and applauding, taking the Panama Canal, even though Donald Trump is not committing boots on the ground and doing either of those things. And so what is he talking about here? He's just. This was sort of like, you know, Donald Trump takes us off to fairyland. It was like a. A Cash Patel bedtime story. And I think a lot of people are rightly appalled by what they saw last night. You talk about, you know, the way he was going after the trans community, the LGBTQ+ community. The way he was going after African nations, I mean, you know, every, almost every one of the bits of waste, fraud and abuse he was outlining as part of the Doge cuts, dealt with, you know, people of color in faraway countries, the so called shithole countries that he's talked about in the past. And it just occurred to me, you know, taking that all in and I know you fell asleep. I was bored quite a bit at times. But when I woke up this morning, I just thought, you know, he's just never going to be the president for all of us, and that's just a damn shame.
- [07:02]
Tim Miller
And the way that it's corrupted the party. You're right. Like, I did notice this. The most boisterous cheer, I think, was for the Gulf of America, and I wasn't in the room. And to me, that just says, again, whatever, honestly. And I'm living down here on the Gulf of Mexico and I dare you to sue me. Eagle Ed Martin. You know, but again, it's just like, that's not serious. That's not about caring about your fellow Americans. It's a troll. Like, what they were cheering for was not that they were excited that the Body of Water's name changed. They were cheering because they want Jim Acosta to be sad. You know what I mean? They want, like liberals to be mad. Right? And that's what they like.
- [07:36]
Jim Acosta
And also taking jabs at Mexico.
- [07:38]
Tim Miller
Yeah, right.
- [07:39]
Jim Acosta
I mean, you know, it's one of his favorite punching bags. I used to say during the first term, it's the three M's, the Mexicans, the Muslims in the media. And this time around, I mean, you can add a few more to that list. And I just think that the constant railing against wokeism and so on, it's just sort of scoring cheap points. It's beneath the dignity of the office. It's beneath what the office should be. And you were talking about the economy earlier. The most news he made last night is when he said there's going to be a little bit of a disturbance from these tariffs kicking in. That was a full acknowledgement right there that Americans are going to feel pain. And one of the things you're already starting to hear coming out of the financial markets today is, oh, well, maybe Donald Trump is going to have some carve outs for some of these tariffs on Canada and Mexico and so on. They already know that he has stepped in it with this grandpa makes up economic policy on a barstool stuff that he spews out there. And this is the kind of stuff that Americans are already fed up with. That's why they're erupting at town halls for Republicans in deep red districts. And I think it's just the beginning of that.
- [08:49]
Tim Miller
Yeah. And it's why he's back underwater in the recent polls for the first time. One more thing on the degradation of my former party. Last night, Lindsey Graham sent this tweet. My take on President Trump's address. Inspiring, funny, compelling. And the Democrats worst nightmare, Trump 2028. Now, again, it's a troll. And so you hate to play into their games, but here's the problem is that so many times things that were trolls became real. Like the Muslim ban was a troll at the start and then he did it. Right. And so they are playing a very dangerous game by even doing tongue in cheek Trump third term stuff, I think, because this guy's going to be 81 and a half years old when it comes time to get down to business that in 2028. Are you sure he's not going to take you seriously, Lindsey Graham? Because I'm not.
- [09:43]
Jim Acosta
And he's barely making any sense now. I'm not talking about Lindsey Graham. I guess I could be talking about Lindsey Graham, but I mean, my response to Donald Trump wanting to run for a third term is the Democrats should think about getting Barack Obama out there. It's like, okay, well, if you're gonna do it, we're gonna do it and we're gonna put Barack Obama out there and then see what happens. I agree with you. It is a little scary when they engage in that kind of rhetoric. It is a troll. But I agree with you. It has to be taken seriously. I mean, Trump to me is kind of a. He's like a fusion reactor of hatred. He generates it and he thrives on it. He feeds off of it. And at some point, I'm a foolish optimist. I just think that the spell is going to be broken. And we saw this during the first Trump term, during Trump 1.0, I should say, his mishandling of COVID Again, it gets back to what I was saying earlier about the sheer incompetence of what they do. They do eventually trip over their own feet. And so, yes, it's painful. Yes, it's not fun watching what he was doing last night. But I really do think as much as he likes to call people like me the enemy and you the enemy, he's his own worst enemy.
- [10:47]
Tim Miller
When you go a little deeper with the Dems, with Amanda Lippman in The next segment, but I just. Any sense for what their reaction was last night? I kind of think it doesn't really matter what they do in a setting such as that. But, you know, a lot of people had feelings about it, whether it was Al Green shouting at him or the little signs that some of them made. What'd you make about the Democratic response again?
- [11:08]
Jim Acosta
After Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert and Congressman Wilson, it's sort of like, at this point, what more can anybody do? You know, okay, Congressman Green gets up and walks out, and a number of other Democrats did it. If that's what they want to do, that's fine. I think you could also just not show up. I mean, what would that image have been like last night if the entire Democratic Party just didn't show up for the State of the Union speech? I mean, I don't know. It's tough. And the Democrats are in the wilderness right now. You know, you've seen your party in the wilderness after 2012 when Mitt Romney lost, and they just, they're trying to figure out what to do next. And then Donald Trump comes along and picks up the mantle. You know, I think this time around, my sense of it is, is that the Democrats are going to be led by the people instead of the other way around. And you're already starting to see that. You're starting to see people say Dems are not doing enough. They're not getting out there and making more of a stink out of what's taking place with Doge and so on. There are certainly members who will take issue with that and say, hey, wait a minute, I'm out there. I'm, I'm whipping things up. But the party as a whole just looks to be lost right now. My sense of it is, is some sort of populist figure within the party or on the fringes of the party, or maybe an independent may take the party in a new direction in the way that Trump did with the Republicans.
- [12:21]
Tim Miller
I agree with that, too. I mean, that might not happen, but I think that the, the populist is prime for that. For somebody picking up the mantle and, and demonstrating they can be a fighter and a leader and going any number of directions, we'll see if somebody actually does it. Deleteme makes it easy, quick, and safe to remove your personal data online. At a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make everybody vulnerable, Deleteme does all the hard work wiping you and your family's personal information from data broker websites. Deleteme knows Your privacy is worth protecting. You can sign up and provide Deleteme with exactly what information you want deleted and their experts take it from there. I guess since the election, but even since the inauguration, I've noticed even more kind of spam attacks on me. Somebody that is in the public eye, that's annoying people a lot of times. And so having a service like Deleteme that is consistently looking at what is out there and updating it and scrubbing it is something that's going to be increasingly valuable for me in the years ahead and I assume valuable for many of you. So take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Deleteme now at a special discount for our listeners today. Get 20% off your Delete Me plan by texting Bulwark to 64000. The only way to get 20% off is to text Bulwark to 64000. That's Bulwark to 64000. Message and data rates may apply. So we have a couple of news items this morning I want to talk to you about. The Supreme Court upheld a lower court's order that would force USAID, the State Department, to pay 2 billion that was owed to contractors for work that had already been performed. They put the stop payments on. So this is not about future aid payments, but at least it's back pay. To me. It's just, it's interesting because we're going to have a lot of these skirmishes at the Supreme Court because of the extralegal and illegal actions of Trump and Musk. And so it was interesting. It ends up being a 5, 4 ruling with Roberts and Coney Barrett. So on the one hand you can kind of look at that and say, okay, well, it's good that the contracts that the United States made have been upheld. On the other hand, you're like, boy, pretty tenuous there that it was only a one vote majority. I don't know. What do you make of that?
- [14:45]
Jim Acosta
I mean, yeah, a couple of things. Donald Trump not paying his bills. Who would have thought that that would have happened? You know, jeez, is there a track record there? I can't remember. What does Google tell us? The Supreme Court is an interesting dynamic and interesting part of all this. You know, the fact that it was five to four to me is sort of pathetic. In a time when we didn't have a hyper partisan Supreme Court judicial branch, perhaps, you know, it would have come down in a much more decisive way against what the administration is trying to do. I Mean, I mean, let's just be real about this. Donald Trump is trying to become a dictator in this country. There's just no question about it. Maybe it's an American form of dictatorship where he knows he can't get away with everything. The people around him know he can't get away with everything, but he's going to give it a hell of a try. And for some of the people on the Supreme Court, I'm not gonna mention any names to go along with. This is disgraceful. And to me, you know, it's no wonder you were talking about poll numbers. It's no wonder that confidence in the Supreme Court is, I think, near an all time low, if it's not an all time low. And I tend to agree with, you know, when Biden was on his way out, not to say, I know it's probably not fashionable these days to praise anything that Joe Biden does or says, but when he was talking about term limits for the Supreme Court, I mean, I've long felt that that needs to happen. It is ridiculous that you can put hyper partisan people on the supreme court in their 40s and hope that they live for another 50 years. Just to me, it's just sort of a gross exploitation of the checks and balances and trying to find loopholes to rig a system that's supposed to protect all of us and uphold the rule of law.
- [16:25]
Tim Miller
You say the American foreign dictatorship. And what he's trying to do, really, they think that he has unlimited Article 2 powers for the executive branch. It doesn't matter what Congress actually passed legislation as far as funds are, and supposedly they have the power of the purse. But we can actually do whatever we want and we can just stop payments. We can stop things that have been approved by Congress, signed by previous presidents. We can do whatever we want. Then the question is, does the court allow that? Right. And if the court doesn't, then eventually that becomes kind of the next step. Right. Of this question of are they going to try to defy that? Luckily, we have not reached that point yet. But I just think when you look at these things, when there are just cut and dry cases like this that end up five, four, you know, we'll see where Amy Coney Barrett ends up. But it's hard to imagine that she won't end up on the other side of this when the circumstances are slightly less egregious.
- [17:18]
Jim Acosta
You're absolutely right. And I think that's where the rubber is going to meet the road here. Because, you know, if the courts say no you can't do this. And he keeps defying the courts. What. What do we do at that point? I. I mean, I don't know if anybody has really answered that question. And, you know, the last time around, at the end of his first term, you know, we were all pretty damn lucky that he left the building. And, you know, my concern this next time around is, you know, no matter what happens in the upcoming election, you know, he's just not going to want to give this up. I was with him on January 20, 2021. I was at that ridiculous departure ceremony that he had at Joint Base Andrews. It looked like a dictator going off into exile. I was with him on Air Force One for that last flight to West Palm Beach. Really?
- [18:06]
Tim Miller
I guess I didn't know that I was.
- [18:08]
Jim Acosta
I was in the pool that day. Yeah. This is before they were kicking people out of the pool.
- [18:12]
Tim Miller
Who else was in the pool?
- [18:13]
Jim Acosta
Who else was in the pool that day? Was it Steve Holland? Gosh, it was a lot of the regulars, the ap, Reuters, all the people that they don't let in now we're all there. But CNN had the pool seat that day.
- [18:23]
Tim Miller
What was that like?
- [18:24]
Jim Acosta
It was surreal. And a couple of jokes were made. You know, Jim, I hope you make it the whole flight, you know. You know, do you have your parachute? And my hope the whole time was that he was going to come into the press cabin and talk to us, but he hid in his little area of Air Force One, didn't come back to talk to us, and sulked. Exactly. And, you know, my thought the entire time was, jesus Christ, we got so lucky here. We got so lucky that he got on the goddamn plane and went back to Florida. Because who the hell knows what would have happened if he had just stayed or if the people who had stormed the Capitol on January 6th had gotten worse. I do worry about what is going to happen to this country if and when he has to relinquish power. Hopefully when. And I wrote a little bit that day for my old place. I thought about, you know, writing a book about some of this stuff, because that day, to me was sort of like when we were all sort of hanging by a thread and thank goodness. I don't know if it was some, you know, ounce of shame that was left in him. Probably not. It was maybe Ivanka talking to. Getting on the. I don't know. But I was there at Joint Base Andrews when Don and Eric were crying. It was just a whole scene. And I just kept saying to myself over and again, jesus Christ, we got so lucky here that he just actually left.
- [19:48]
Tim Miller
It's not very masculine, the tears over losing an election. It's like the child.
- [19:53]
Jim Acosta
Not exactly. Not the strength that they like to project.
- [19:58]
Tim Miller
What happened when you landed? Did they just. Because he doesn't have the beast anymore, he just had a limo waiting for him and he went to Mar a Lago and you guys were off duty or you stayed outside Margo, like, what happened?
- [20:11]
Jim Acosta
Yeah, I forget all the terminology, but, you know, once the inauguration happens, Air Force One becomes a different plane. It has a different designation. Air Force One is technically the other plane that was going to be taking Biden around. But at that point, he landed at a general aviation airport in West Palm Beach. I remember he and Melania came off the plane. They both went their separate ways, and then he got into a Secret Service limo and then he left. And we were all yelling questions at him, and he just wouldn't take any of our questions. The only contact that we had was with a press aide named Margo Martin. And I won't forget. I sort of forget the exact words, but I won't forget the thrust of what she was saying, which is, you know, he's not very good at sitting still. And I just thought to myself, yeah, he's, you know, and I try to tell people, you know, at that time, I said, you know, because it was fashionable for folks to say, that's it, he's done. We don't have to worry anymore. Yay. And I was like, nah, this guy's not done. He is not done.
- [21:11]
Tim Miller
Right, you guys. So we had a big party on Saturday for my husband's 40th. And, you know, at social gatherings, there are some people that are looking for an alternative to alcohol that want to enjoy the music. The DJ 87 was pumping through my living room and enjoy camaraderie with friends, enjoy the Mardi Gras spirit, but without the hangover. And several people turned to the sole beverages that were in my fridge. This podcast is sponsored by sol. If you listen to the show, you've heard me rave about Sol's out of office gummies. Well, the team at SOL just launched their new out of office beverages that are perfectly microdosed with hemp derived THC and CBD to give any situation that vacation vibe. The out of office beverages not only come in two mouthwatering flavors, Raspberry lemonade and cucumber melon lime. They also offer two different doses, the 2.5 THC and the 5 milligram THC. So you can feel the freedom to choose with 6, 12 or 24 packs and drink your THC any way you like. I gotta tell you, that raspberry lemonade was pretty yummy. I dabbled in that myself over the weekend. So out of office beverages give you that warm, fuzzy, euphoric microdose feeling without sending you to the moon. You can crack one open after a hard day work, wind down with your favorite TV show, or share a six pack with your friends at your next hangout. Whatever floats your boat. So if you want to feel your best, head to getsoul.com and use code the bulwark for 30% off your order. That's 30% off your order. Using Code the Bulwark one last time, getsoul.com and code the bulwark for 30% off. You're mentioning the press. So you were there because you're in the press pool, right? And we have this news about how they've changed the way it works now, where instead of the White House Correspondent association deciding who gets to be, you know, on the plane in those moments. And the point of this is that the whole press corps can't be on the plane. Right. So you choose representative outlets. Just explain to people, like, how that process works and why it's so alarming that they've decided to change it.
- [23:19]
Jim Acosta
Yeah, I mean, you know, the way I try to explain it to folks is, you know, you obviously can't have a couple hundred members of the press on Air Force One or in the Oval Office. It's just, you know, it would just be total chaos. And so what the White House Correspondents association tries to do, what the networks try to do is put together a pool of reporters. And, Tim, you know how this works, but I'll explain it. So there's one representative for the TV networks every day there are a couple of wire service reporters like the AP and Reuters, and then you have some print reporters from, like, the New York Times, Washington Post, Bloomberg, that sort of thing. And that forms the pool. And they represent the larger White House press corps. They're with the President when he's at an event, behind the scenes talking to people. They're on Air Force One in case he comes back to the press cabin. They're in the Oval Office in case he makes some remarks. And because we can't put all those things out live at all times, the people in the pool put together a little note on their phone. They send it out to the whca, which blasts it out to everybody in the press that way Everybody has near instant information as to what is going on with the President pretty much at all times. And then at the end of the day, they'll put out a note that says, okay, the White House has told us we don't expect them to do anything else today. You have a good night. That's a wrap for the day, and so on. And we've sort of relied on this system for years now, going back multiple presidents from both parties and what Trump has tried to do just in recent days. And some of this goes back to when I was covering the White House first time around. They took away my press pass and I had to go get it back. This time around, it's sort of that. That approach, but on steroids. And so when the AP said, well, we're not going to call it the Gulf of America, we're going to call it the Gulf of Mexico, because that's the damn name for the thing, he kicked them out of the press pool, which means no more Oval Office, no more Air Force One. And now they've gone even further, Tim, as you know, and they've said, well, we're going to decide who is in the press pool. Which is absolutely ridiculous to think that, and is part of the reason why we saw the other day in the Oval Office when Zelensky was in there with Trump. You heard that moron ask the question, why aren't you wearing a suit to Zielinski?
- [25:25]
Tim Miller
Brian Glenn.
- [25:26]
Jim Acosta
Yeah, so you're going to end up with sycophants.
- [25:28]
Tim Miller
Marjorie Taylor Greene's boyfriend is shouting a question at the Ukrainian president. That's just idiocracy, which I hear is.
- [25:34]
Jim Acosta
At the top of his resume. I think that's the thing that he's like, well, first of all, you know, I used to work at a Dairy Queen, but above that is who I date. But anyway, I'm succumbing to tomfoolery here.
- [25:45]
Tim Miller
But we do tomfoolery.
- [25:48]
Jim Acosta
It's just a joke. I mean, that's how they do things in totalitarian countries, Tim. We can't have the leader of the free world doing this.
- [25:56]
Tim Miller
Yeah, well, just you telling the story about him leaving, I think, to me puts a fine point about why this matters, because on the one hand, I could see how some people are like, who cares if it's the AP or if it's the first day? It's not like they put just the craziest people in. They're like, we're gonna replace the AP with Axios. You can't get mad at us for that. Right. But the thing is, they will know when there are things happening that are sensitive or controversial or whatever. Right. And it's like. And so if the White House corresponds association is deciding who's in the pool, then it's like, neutral. Right. But if they think something bad might happen that day, or it's the day where Mr. Trump's gonna be sad and sulking, they can be like, okay, well, today we're gonna put in Newsmax. And, you know, Matt Gaetz has a new podcast. He can be in the pool and whatever. Yeah. And like, that kind of shows the concern.
- [26:47]
Jim Acosta
Yeah. There's no question. And, you know, there's just something wrong. And they said this during my press pass case. The Justice Department lawyer said this in court that the White House should be able to pick and choose who, who covers the president. And, you know, it's just silly. It's just not how we do things in this country. And the way I describe it to folks, and yes, you're absolutely right. You know, folks may not care about who gets kicked in and who's left out and blah, blah, blah. You know, why don't you be big boys and girls and just deal with it. The problem is, is that, okay, Trump gets away with it. Now the governor of Missouri wants to do it. Now the mayor of Los Angeles wants to do it. Mayor of Los Angeles says, hey, I don't like the way the LA Times wrote this story about the way I handled the fires. Get them out of here. I don't want this. Oh, oh, the courts have a problem with that. Donald Trump did it to the ap, so that means I get to do it, too. And so then, what the hell? Do we have a free press anymore?
- [27:36]
Tim Miller
Right. Slippery slope.
- [27:38]
Jim Acosta
And, Tim, one of the things that you should, should take a look at and maybe already have is when Caroline Levitt put out the note about we're going to pick the people in the, in the press pool, they said, well, but the networks will continue to be able to go in there and get their video and everything. So they, they know that Donald Trump is so addicted to being on camera and being on TV that it's like, oh, well, we're not going to mess with the networks. The networks could come in. Never mind. Don't worry about that, guys. You'll come in and get your pictures. But we'll screw with the ap, we'll screw with this little guy over here and so on.
- [28:08]
Tim Miller
Right? Because he doesn't read. So not as much of a problem.
- [28:10]
Jim Acosta
Just with a sharpie when he just writes out, I hate this story, you know.
- [28:14]
Tim Miller
And so, yeah, this is too important to not mention today. Just this morning, we have news that CIA Director John Ratcliffe said that the US has paused intelligence support for Ukraine. He said Trump has a real question about whether President Zelensky was committed to the peace process. And he said, let's pause. There was a story out of the uk It's a tabloid story, so, you know, we'll see this as an ongoing news story, but that US Also told the UK that they can't share intelligence. I assume Prime Minister Starmer will tell them to pound sand. Assume if that is true. But this, to me is even more alarming than the military aid issue because A, it's immediate, right? Like, they already have a lot of the military aid that we've sent them, and B, it could cause problems, like, as we speak on the battlefield, if Ukraine isn't able to get information about what's happening with, you know, the Russian troops. So, I don't know. Any thoughts on that in the broader treatment of Ukraine?
- [29:09]
Jim Acosta
Yeah, I mean, to me, I agree with you. That is a very chilling development. And, you know, if we're not going to be sharing intelligence with the Ukrainians when they're fighting for their survival, you know, what are we doing here? And it just seems like every time, and I've noticed this since covering him during the 2016 campaign, every time Russia is involved in the equation, every time Vladimir Putin is involved in the equation, for some reason, that's where Trump goes. That's where. That's how Trump sides and comes down on things, is with the Russians and Vladimir Putin. And it's just the damnedest thing. And maybe one day the mystery will be solved. The Scooby Doo mystery will be solved, and they'll pull the head off of whoever, and it'll be old man Withers from the haunted amusement park. But to me, I just don't get it. And maybe we're all going to figure this out one day, why Donald Trump is just always partial to Vladimir Putin at every turn. And the sad state of affairs in all of this is that the Ukrainians have been courageously fighting for the survival of their country. I remember speaking with a Special Forces soldier on one of my shows a couple years ago, and she brought me a metal coin that was made from the metal of a Russian tank that was blown up in one of the battles over there. And then she was later almost killed in an IED explosion. I've met a couple of fighter pilots Their code names were Moonfish and Juice. They couldn't give their real names. They've both since died since I interviewed them. And it just. The tremendous toll that this country has gone through, and to think that the United States of America is just going to throw them to the lions, to me, is disgraceful. And it's going to be something I think this country and all of us are going to regret for many, many years. And, and this just gets to, you know, trying to put out the defense Shield for Trump 2.0 in Europe, which is what they're trying to do right now. How can they run out the clock on Trump's term and protect Europe and protect Ukraine in the process? And it may just involve these other countries doing the intelligence sharing that we're not willing to do, and it's just a damn shame.
- [31:13]
Tim Miller
All right, I'm going to take the lens back here because the whole controversy around you regarding CNN is like, this guy's too mean to Trump. He has Trump duration syndrome. Right. Like, you're criticizing the president, like, you gotta be more fair. And to me, a lot of this is related to the fact that nobody has memories of anything before 2015 anymore. We all have this mass amnesia. And I went back and watched an old clip of you, and I gotta say, you're looking a little more tan now. You're looking a little more confident. You're like, you're blossoming in your 50s. But we're going to pull up.
- [31:47]
Jim Acosta
Well, thank you. I appreciate that.
- [31:48]
Tim Miller
Yeah. Of Jim Acosta before these things. Jim Acosta now talking to Barack Obama. Let's listen.
- [31:54]
Jim Acosta
Okay. Earlier when you said that you have not underestimated ISIS's abilities. This is an organization that you once described as a JV team that evolved into a force that is now occupied territory in Iraq and Syria and is now able to use that safe haven to launch attacks in other parts of the world. How is that not underestimating their capabilities? And how is that contained, quite frankly, And I think a lot of Americans have this frustration that they see that the United States has the greatest military in the world. It has the backing of nearly every other country in the world when it comes to taking on isis. And I guess the question is, and if you'll forgive the language, is why can't we take out these bastards?
- [32:39]
Tim Miller
Big wind up there. You knew the bastards was coming. And he may be a little nervous, but, I mean, affair very tough. You could tell Obama didn't like it. He's harmed. Not like halfway through the question like that's. How shit used to go, right? And there's nobody screaming around. Back then, whenever that was, I think it was 2014, about saying like, oh, Jim Acosta biased. Jim Acosta has Obama derangement syndrome.
- [33:05]
Jim Acosta
And so I really did. I had a bad. It's true.
- [33:08]
Tim Miller
How do you deal with that asymmetry, right? Like, what do you think in this media age, like, how we, how we navigate where we've gotten to?
- [33:16]
Jim Acosta
Well, of all the clips you could have pulled, I'm glad you pulled that one too, because there could have been. There were some ones that you could have pulled that were.
- [33:21]
Tim Miller
You had some clunkers, probably.
- [33:24]
Jim Acosta
I'm sure people thought that was a clunker too. But yeah, you're right, it is disappointing. I do remember that day. I think the Daily Caller and a bunch of these places that like to come after me were like, jim Acosta destroys Obama and all this stuff. And I'm like, I just, I mean, I just.
- [33:40]
Tim Miller
You did kind of.
- [33:41]
Jim Acosta
I used to have this philosophy, and that is I grew up with blue collar parents and they don't mince words. And I used to think like, what's the kind of question that my dad would ask? What's the kind of question my mom would ask? Are the people at my dad's grocery store, my mom's restaurant? What's the kind of question they would ask? And put it in those kinds of terms. And I remember at the time, the White House press team for Obama, they were furious with me. And then I think Jeffrey Goldberg with the Atlantic or somebody did an interview with somebody on the Obama team, might have been Ben Rhodes or somebody at that time. And I think Jeffrey Goldberg said, well, yeah, that's all well and good, but why can't we get the bastards? And then later on, Ben Rhodes said to me, he said, because we had a conversation about this. He said, you know, Jim, when you asked that question, it actually made us think, well, how are we communicating the successes that we're having on the battlefield against isis? Eric Schultz, who used to work for Obama, would send me emails every now and then and say, hey, we got got one of the bastards when they would blow somebody up with isis. And so I, you know, I think that sometimes a tough question, even maybe a slightly pugnacious question can do some good. And it's why we should have reporters. They're willing to ask these kinds of hard questions, not, why are you not wearing a suit today? When Elon Musk two days earlier was wearing an Occupy Mars T shirt in the Oval Office. I just think we're well served. When somebody's doing kind of the Sam Donaldson thing or the Dan Rather thing, and you know, I'm going to keep.
- [35:07]
Tim Miller
Doing it, you just worry that's gone. I mean, like, I just. CNN's in such a tough spot right now. I mean, you know, Fox obviously is totally in the tank. MSNBC is rejiggering the networks. Nobody's watching. I mean, as somebody who just left that world, like, how worried are you that, like, that type of just, no bullshit, willing to challenge a politician no matter who, like, do you worry that's just, like, kind of gone?
- [35:32]
Jim Acosta
It's not gone, but it may be going away. And the problem is, is that in this environment, everybody is suspicious of everybody else's motives. And you can't just be a cantankerous son of a bitch reporter who likes to ask tough questions. And I think that it's okay to have people like that. We need that in American society. I grew up with Ted Koppel on Nightline, and like I said, Sam Donaldson shouting questions at Reagan at the White House. And I always thought that was a good thing. And these days, they want to run you out of town on a rail if you're doing that sort of thing. But, Tim, honestly, all of this, you know, give Obama some credit. He answered the question. He took the question without blowing his top and taking away my press pass. One of the problems that we're in right now is that Donald Trump cannot just take the hard questions. He cannot handle the heat, and he wants to act like a dictator. And that is just a different kind of experience than we've ever had before with the president. Ronald Reagan wasn't throwing Sam Donaldson out of the White House because he was yelling questions to Reagan as he was getting on Marine One. Some of this flows from the guy at the top. And if he just can't handle the hard questions, you've just got to wonder, can he handle the job of being President of the United States? And I think he just proves over and over again he cannot. Yes, he's the luckiest son of a gun out there. There's no question about it. That debate can be put to the side. I think it's also not up for debate that he just cannot handle scrutiny. He's never been able to handle it, and it's always going to be a problem for him, and that means it's going to be a problem for us.
- [37:02]
Tim Miller
The unfortunate part is he's convinced so many people that the scrutiny is bullshit, too. And that's the hardest part to fix, in fairness. I mean, Caitlin's still in there asking tough questions.
- [37:13]
Jim Acosta
Sure.
- [37:13]
Tim Miller
I do think having people in there asking tough questions is a more useful use of time than having four people shout at Scott Jennings. That's just one man's. That's just one man's opinion. But do the tough questions even stick if he has pulled the wool over.
- [37:26]
Jim Acosta
And I think we have to be careful of giving them what they want when they're going after the press. And that's why I have said if this continues, they continue to abuse the press and throw them out and that sort of thing. There has to be some sort of collective action on the part of the press. You know, if they really care about having those TV networks, it's gonna require Fox, though.
- [37:46]
Tim Miller
Yeah. There's no collective action without them.
- [37:48]
Jim Acosta
Well, that's true. And people can go do a Google and find out what rest of the White House press corps was standing up for Fox when the Obama White House was giving them a hard time. The rest of the White House press corps got together and said, no, no, no, you're not going to keep Fox out of stuff. I mean, that will be a telling moment. If the networks say, listen, unless you let the AP back in there, you're not getting your TV pool every day. And then let's see what Fox does. My sense of it is they may go with the networks on this and say it's time to back down, but like you said, we're not on Earth One anymore.
- [38:20]
Tim Miller
Yeah, we'll see.
- [38:21]
Jim Acosta
Tim, I know you come from a good place in all of this. It's gratifying for me to see you out there doing the work that you're doing. There are enough of us who care about this, and that's the important thing. There are enough of us who care about this, care about the truth, care about holding elected leaders accountable. I generally think we're going to be okay in the long run. We're just going to have to outlast this moment.
- [38:42]
Tim Miller
All right, I appreciate it. Jim Acosta. Check him out. The Jim Acosta show and his substack. He's a free man now. Thank you for coming.
- [38:49]
Jim Acosta
Coming on, it's like the Shawshank Redemption, you know.
- [38:51]
Tim Miller
Thanks for coming on the podcast. Up next, Amanda Litman from Run for Something. All right, we are back. She's the co founder and president of Run for Something and author of the forthcoming book when we're in the Next Generation's Guide to Leadership Outcome. This May. It's Amanda Lipman. What's up, girl?
- [39:21]
Amanda Litman
I'm hanging in there. How are you doing, Tim?
- [39:23]
Tim Miller
Well, I'm alive, I'm here, we're all here. I'm doing my best. I didn't make it through the whole speech last night. I had to watch Alyssa this morning. I guess I was a little tired after a big Mardi Gras weekend. But it was also really fucking long. But we're doing our best. I've been wanting to have you on. It's unfortunately Donald Trump makes it hard to get off of doing just the news because there's so much shit happening. But you're doing some work that's more long lead that I want to talk about. But before we get to that and running for something, I did want to put your kind of your strategist hat on. You did some of that for a little while and ask you what you thought about the Democrats various responses last night. AOC and Jasmine Crockett, like, I'm not going. Some of them, she's on Instagram, Al Green shouting, some gals are in pink, Some people are holding signs, some people are doing nothing. What'd you make about of it?
- [40:17]
Amanda Litman
You know, I think the only goal of the responses, any of the responses to the speech last night had to be make it a bigger spectacle than the speech itself. And none of them really succeeded in doing that.
- [40:28]
Tim Miller
So a little eh for you?
- [40:32]
Amanda Litman
Yeah.
- [40:32]
Tim Miller
Yeah. I don't know. I'm kind of of the view. Here's my counter punch to that. I am me and you are usually aligned on this. Like I want more is more. Get out there. Swing and miss. Sometimes it's okay. Donald Trump misses a lot of pitches. He got elected twice, you know. But be out there. Dad said on a night like that, like it's going to be tough. Like what are you going to do that's not going to be kind of cringe? Like it's very challenging to kind of think of something that'd be actually useful. And to me it's almost like I just probably wouldn't have even shown up and then woken up this morning and gotten on social media or gotten on the bulwark YouTube or gotten on whatever and just started going, you know, about the economy, about Elon, about all the other things that are on message. Like was it kind of a loot? Was it like a battle they couldn't win, I guess last night.
- [41:17]
Amanda Litman
You know, I think you're probably right that there was no nothing like in the room or even online they could have done in the moment. But I kind of wish that if they were gonna try something, they had like, made a bigger deal out of it or at least been more organized. This like one off, holding up the signs, the pink suit, the sort of boring speech after which was so late at night that who watches that anyway? It was probably a lose lose. But if they were going to try, I wanted them to go bigger to the speech afterwards.
- [41:48]
Tim Miller
Alyssa Slotkin. I had to get your take on this because as a former Republican, I was like, this is pretty good for me. But I do wonder how somebody that's in touch with Democratic grassroots thought about it. I want to play one clip. From what?
- [42:03]
E
After the spectacle that just took place in the Oval Office last week, Reagan must be rolling in his grave. We all want an end to the war in Ukraine, but Reagan understood that true strength required America to combine our military and economic might with moral clarity. And that scene in the Oval Office wasn't just a bad episode of reality tv. It summed up Trump's whole approach to the world. He believes in cozying up to dictators like Vladimir Putin and kicking our friends like the Canadians in the teeth. He sees American leadership as merely a series of real estate transactions. As a Cold War kid, I'm thankful it was Reagan and not Trump in office in the 1980s. Trump would have lost us the Cold War.
- [42:49]
Tim Miller
Okay, on the one hand, Reagan loving boomers are gonna vote in the midterms, so there's something to be said for that. On the other hand, what'd you think about the Reagan hagiography from the Democratic response?
- [43:02]
Amanda Litman
The target audience for that was no one under the age of 48, 47.
- [43:07]
Tim Miller
Well, excuse me, caught me. There's a handful of nerds of never Trumper nerds who are in their early 40s that it hit, but that's okay.
- [43:17]
Amanda Litman
I don't certainly notice millennials, and that's about it. Which is fine. That's an audience that needs pandering too. Not my cup of tea and I think not quite speaking to a lot of the Democratic bases right now, but. But that's okay. Not everything has to be for everyone.
- [43:34]
Tim Miller
What'd you make of the senders? I want to give them credit for stuff because it's like, do more, do more, do more. And then they do more and people are like, eh, they had all these guys doing these shit that ain't true videos and I would play that for you, but it doesn't really work in audio form. You have to go onto your Instagram to see it. But where it's basically like all the senators had a similar script about the way that Trump and Elon have been lying. What'd you make about that? What'd you make of that?
- [43:59]
Amanda Litman
You know, I think it's good to give them credit for trying stuff. And I saw that, like, Elon and a bunch of the right wing influencers were lifting it up, which means they were all lifting up, you know, visual images that were like, shit, that ain't true about Trump and talking about prices. So in that sense, I think it's good to, like, farm a little outrage. Is it the most effective social media content? Probably not, but baby steps in the right direction is better than, like, baby steps in the wrong direction.
- [44:22]
Tim Miller
All right, I'm with you. Is there anybody out there that you think you've been like, they've been really nailing it the last two months?
- [44:28]
Amanda Litman
No, I think AOC pretty typically is one of the better ones, in which it seems so authentic. I think Chris Murphy's shtick is not always for me, but it does seem true to him and I appreciate that he seems genuinely furious and is communicating that in a way that really works. Other than that, I think we've still got a lot of wide open field for people to step up, which is, again, chaos is a ladder. Climate, Democrats just fucking climate.
- [44:52]
Tim Miller
That phrase is right. Genuinely furious. When people ask me, like, what do you want? I'm like, I want you to be genuinely furious. There's a lot of things to be furious about, and I actually don't care if it's the thing that I'm furious about. And not all the Democrats need to be furious about the same things. Some Democrats, you can be furious about whatever it is that you think your constituents are furious about, or whatever it is that animates you as a politician and try to bring people along with you. And like, that, I think, has been the thing that when people are like, the Democratic base is unhappy, to me, that is what is missing, right? They're like, we are really fucking mad. Just be mad too. Like, also do stuff, but just be mad too for starters.
- [45:35]
Amanda Litman
Well, it's because when they're not mad, it makes us feel like the crazy ones for being mad. I don't want to be gaslit. Like, my rage is not misplaced. It is not invalid. It is totally legitimate. And if my elected leaders aren't showing that, or if they're like, oh, calm down, we're gonna talk about the price of eggs. There's not an election for this shit for another 18 months. Be mad Right now and then channel my fury into something good. But be mad with me. It will make me feel better.
- [45:58]
Tim Miller
I agree. Feelings do matter. Maybe I'm a millennial postmodern. I want to talk about run for something. You've been doing this. How many years you've been doing this for?
- [46:07]
Amanda Litman
Since Trump's first Inauguration Day. So we're gone on eight years.
- [46:10]
Tim Miller
You've been doing the Lord's work. We do also get feedback from people like, what should I do? What should I do? And I think there is a sense of frustration of, like, how can I be helpful? I want to help. And, you know, there's phone calling, there's some other other things. But I wanted to highlight what you're doing because I think it's so important. And I just want to set the table at this because I think it's not that it hasn't been important in all of the eight years before that, but I think it's as important as ever. Right. Right now, like in this moment, March of 2025. And here's why I say that I just made a list from my memory this morning when I woke up. I'm sure there are other examples of this, but of wave elections, of kind of weird things that I remember happening. I was in Iowa in 2006. This was a Democratic wave election. This guy, Dave Loebsack, who is a professor at the University of Iowa, who had no money and was a far left lib, like, ends up winning a district that nobody even ran ads in, Right? Like, he just was on the field and he ends up being in Congress. 2009, Scott Brown, everybody remembers that. A Massachusetts Senate race, the Republican wins. Now, he might seem kind of like a typical MAGA Republican, but he ran then as kind of a heterodox, centrist, kind of populist Republican. 2018, you were around for all this. Doug Jones. Kendra Horne wins in Oklahoma City. Joe Cunningham wins in Charleston. Max Rose in Staten Island. Susan Wilde is still around and she's a great congresswoman. Wins in our district in Pennsylvania. Allred wins in George Bush's district in Dallas and then ends up becoming the Senate candidate. Doesn't win. But you can see the long term value there. Like, these people won in unsuspecting places. But in order to win in unsuspecting places, like, you have to try, right? And I think that this year in 2026, if the Trump thing is as much of a shit show as we all expect it's going to be, people are going to be able to win. In unexpected places. And so you got to be out there to do it. I gave a bunch of congressional examples, but you do this all the way down the ballot. So talk about your. Do you agree with me that, like, this is going to be the most ripe time and do you feel like folks are going to respond to it?
- [48:21]
Amanda Litman
I think that we have to, like, we Democrats have to mentally and practically prepare to win big in 2026, which feels like an insane thing to say right now. And the way we do that is by preparing to field as many candidates as possible for as many of these races as possible. And that recruitment work is happening now. You know, in 20, I think it was 2018, we worked with a woman running for state leg in Georgia in, like, pretty rural Georgia in a district that a Democrat had never competed in in the, like, 50 years since they had drawn these maps, there had never been a Democrat on the ballot there. She ran, she won. Because as it turns out, in a year where there's a wave election, giving people an alternative will allow someone else to show up and, like, actually take power. We have had this happen so many times over the years where we'll have the first or only Democrat to run in that race five years, 10 years ever, who will, if not win, come within a point or two. And all of a sudden in the next cycle, that district is a competitive race. It is like the most basic building block of actually party building and of competing in these elections is to get a good candidate on the ballot. And it's not that hard. That's like the thing with running for office. It is hard work. It takes a lot of time, it takes a lot of effort, but it's actually not that difficult in terms of like, like logistics and communication. That's what run for something is here to do is we help people figure all of that out once they've decided. This is a step I want to take.
- [49:47]
Tim Miller
Yeah, I like that you said that about district never ended. When we moved here to New Orleans, I kind of looked at the state House map and I said to my husband, I was like, now if you want to run for state House, we could move to Kenner, which is in the New Orleans suburbs, because the Democrats don't run a candidate there. And I'm like, I'm pretty sure that in a wave year, a Democrat could probably win in, like, the New Orleans suburbs. Right. Like that was. That's like the Oklahoma City congressional example I gave. Right. Like, there are places like that where there still is a lag. The other thing I wanted to just get your take on because I think sometimes people like, assume they can't do it or assume they shouldn't. I think that this is going to be a good year. Like, across the spectrum, I talk to Never Trumpers all the time who are like, I want to primary my Republican. I'm like, no, like, depending on where you live, like, just run as a Democrat. Like, you could just switch parties and run. You can have some different views. And I think that's probably true for populist, lefty Democrats too. Right. Like, so I'm not even like, obviously I would prefer the Never Trumpers run, but I think across the board, you know, having different types of views, particularly if they reflect where you are, is a good thing, I think in these types of off years. What do you think about that?
- [50:57]
Amanda Litman
That I think that's absolutely right. I mean, especially when we're talking about state, local or even congressional races, like, you got to run for the place you're in. We should generally be aligned on values like run for something has an endorsement process. We want to make sure we're all generally aligned on, you know, what we believe. But there's a lot of different ways to actually put those values into practice, depending on the community and what they want and what the, like, mechanics of the office are. And that I think when people are talking about, like, no litmus test, that's the flexibility we need to be at right now.
- [51:25]
Tim Miller
Yeah, you had some former Republicans, Right. Like, have been one run for something candidates.
- [51:29]
Amanda Litman
You know, we have folks who really cross the spectrum. Basically everyone we work with aligns as a Democrat or would align as a Democrat. A lot of these races are technically nonpartisan, but we've got folks ranging from like the most, you know, DSA types, New York City Council candidates to like, pretty conservative school board candidates in places like Alaska or Kansas or, you know, in Texas. As long as they're all on the same page about what we're trying to accomplish, which is really like a pro democracy, pro education, pro working families, you know, pro climate change is real and we have a responsibility to do something about it type approach, we can get behind them.
- [52:04]
Tim Miller
Besides Congress. Congress might seem daunting for people. So, like, at these lower levels. What other types of races you mentioned? School boards, state leg. Is there anything else that you're working with?
- [52:13]
Amanda Litman
So we're thinking about state House, state Senate, city council, which especially when we're talking about housing, which I think is going to be one of the biggest issues in the next couple years, City council, Or municipal offices, county commissions, which often in plenty places, actually oversee elections. So if, you know, we're looking ahead to 2028, those are the kinds of pro democracy positions we need. Library boards, hospital boards, mosquito abatement districts, coroners. About 1300 counties elect coroners. There's about a half a million elected offices in the United States. Most of them are not Congress, and most of them are totally winnable if someone is willing to put in the work and knock doors. And they're way more interesting, I think, and more fun than being a member of Congress.
- [52:50]
Tim Miller
What about the recruitment side? And obviously you guys are doing some. Some people are coming to you. Folks are listening. They're like, I'm not going to run. But everybody has networks. Do you have any advice on that as far as like recruitment, figuring out the offices, finding people?
- [53:06]
Jim Acosta
Yeah.
- [53:06]
Amanda Litman
So run for something has a site, runforwhat.net, you can go to. You can look up at your exact address. What offices are up for you in 2025 or 2026. Fun fact. Since election day, nearly 25,000 people alone have done that. They've gone and looked up what offices they might want to run for and started thinking about running for office. Our total pipeline is only about 200,000 or a little less. So huge number in just the last couple months. Once you do that, you'll start getting materials from our team about how to figure out which office is right for you and how to raise the money. But. But if you're able to identify the problem you care about solving, if you can able to point to how the office you run for will give you power to solve it, and then why voters should want you to win, which is different than why you want to win. You want to win because winning is great and losing sucks. Voters want you to win because you're going to do something for them. Everything else we can teach you.
- [53:55]
Tim Miller
What have you seen so far out there? You mentioned a lot of people have come to the site. There's a lot of conversation about Dems being depressed. Do you feel like you're getting the level of interest in running that you did in 2018? More or less.
- [54:07]
Amanda Litman
So in 2017 and then again in 2018, we had about 15,000 people each year sign up to run for office. We're about to exceed both those years total in just the first quarter of this year.
- [54:17]
Tim Miller
Wow.
- [54:17]
Amanda Litman
It is record numbers. And we're seeing actually most of that come in since inauguration. And basically every time Doge starts firing people or shutting down federal government offices you see, like another conversation with the terminations. We see hundreds and hundreds more people come into us. At the last couple weeks, we've been averaging between five and six hundred people a day thinking about running for office.
- [54:38]
Tim Miller
Awesome. All right, where do people go? For more information?
- [54:41]
Amanda Litman
RunForSomething.net, you can learn more about us. You can give us money, you can volunteer. You can sign up to run and get all the information you have.
- [54:48]
Tim Miller
Any other hot takes you want to share? You know, you're always out there doing goody two shoes stuff. Maybe you want to let loose on something before you go.
- [54:55]
Amanda Litman
You want to feel my big rage today? I think this was one of those things yesterday. If you want to run a guest against a octogenarian, receptagenarian Democratic elected official, especially in a primary, I think this will be a really good year to do it.
- [55:11]
Tim Miller
Okay. Primarying, also primary. I also think it's going to be a good year for primary. That's a good place to leave it. Amanda Lippman, thank you so much for all your work for coming on the pod. Let's hang out soon.
- [55:21]
Amanda Litman
Thanks, Tim.
- [55:22]
Tim Miller
We'll see you. Everybody else, we'll be back here tomorrow for another edition of the Bulwark Podcast. See you all then. Peace.
- [55:28]
Unknown Speaker
It doesn't hurt me you want to feel how it feels you want to know know that it doesn't hurt me you want to hear about the deal and making you it's you and.
- [55:53]
Jim Acosta
And.
- [55:54]
Unknown Speaker
If only could I'd make a deal with God and I get him to swap out places Be running up that road Be running up that hill Be running up that building see if only cool. You don't want to hurt me.
- [56:29]
Tim Miller
See.
- [56:30]
Unknown Speaker
How deep the wood lies unaware there is thunder in our heart for the ones we love. Tell me we both met, don't we?
- [56:52]
Tim Miller
You.
- [56:56]
Unknown Speaker
It'S you and me it's you and me you won't be unhappy and make a deal with God and I can't.
- [57:31]
Tim Miller
The Bulwark Podcast is produced by Katie Cooper with audio engineering and editing by Jason Brown.