A Special Message From Mrs. Erika Kirk

Summary

---

The Charlie Kirk Show - “A Special Message From Mrs. Erika Kirk”

Date: April 29, 2026
Host: Charlie Kirk
Episode Summary Compiled by Podcast Summarizer

---

Overview of the Episode

This episode of The Charlie Kirk Show features a series of open mic dialogues recorded on a university campus, focusing on hot-button cultural and political issues facing America. The main themes include the importance of civil discourse, the dangers of dehumanization in political debate, and a range of audience-led Q&A segments on topics like immigration, abortion, affirmative action, gender, atheism, faith’s role in politics, and America’s cultural direction. Notably, the episode includes a special segment from Mrs. Erika Kirk (widow of Charlie's character in this hypothetical context), who addresses the divisiveness and violence animating present-day America and the toll of political dehumanization.

---

Main Themes & Purpose

• Civil Discourse and Debate: Emphasis on engaging opposing viewpoints as a remedy for political polarization and violence.
• Dangers of Dehumanization: Highlighting how political disagreement can descend into moral condemnation and even violence.
• Faith and Morality: Exploration of how Christianity shapes conservative perspectives on culture and politics.
• Active Citizenship: Encouragement for young Americans to get involved—marriage, family, activism, and community.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Opening Remarks – Charlie Kirk’s Call to Action

• Encourages active engagement: “If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you’re gonna end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you will end up purposeful.” (Charlie Kirk, 00:06)
• Traditional conservative stances: skepticism about college, pro-marriage and family, and building community activism via Turning Point USA.

---

2. Special Message from Erika Kirk: Dehumanization & Violence

(03:50—10:42)

• Erika details her husband’s murder, relating it to national trends in political rhetoric and violence.
• Story from the White House Correspondents’ Dinner: juxtaposes civility in person with "bloodbath" in media coverage the next day.
• Describes journalists filming during a shooting—critiques their desensitization and self-involvement.
• Focus on the shooter being a schoolteacher, illustrating concerns about ideological radicalization of teachers.
• Critiques the left for a lack of empathy after assassination attempts; condemns the normalization and joking about violence.
• Invokes Romans 12:21, commending her husband’s legacy of fostering civil dialogue.
• Notable Quote:

  "If you strip someone of their humanity long enough, you will arrive at the chilling conclusion that they don’t deserve to exist at all." (Erika Kirk, 07:35)

• Appeal to unity and to overcome evil with good.

---

3. Open Mic Campus Q&A: Major Segment Breakdowns

A. Immigration Policy and Morality

(10:44–18:40)

• Student invokes both personal/family experience and biblical examples supporting empathy for immigrants.
• Charlie draws sharp distinction between legal and illegal immigration, emphasizing illegality and negative impacts on native workers.
• Asserts that mass migration harms both the sending and receiving countries by draining talent and resources.
• Calls for a ten-year moratorium ("pause") on all immigration to allow assimilation and decrease social strain, especially in states like California.
• Memorable Moment:

  "We should reward people like your parents that actually came here legally to this country." (Charlie Kirk, 12:25)

B. Abortion: Moral, Scientific, and Scriptural Arguments

(18:40–27:52)

• Student challenges Kirk using biblical passages (Exodus 21) and rare cases of abortion for women’s health.
• Kirk counters with both scientific and religious defenses of pro-life position; draws bright line at conception (formation of new DNA).
• Differentiates between medically necessary procedures (C-section) and elective abortion; refutes "morality by probability" logic.
• Notable Exchange:

  Abortion Questioner: "Do you have evidence a C-section is safer?"
  Charlie: "Yes, it’s self evident... C-sections save lives. They do not terminate lives." (25:31)

C. Atheism, Objective Morality, and American Principles

(27:54–41:55)

• Dialogue with self-identified atheists on the origins of morality. Kirk’s position: atheism cannot ground objective morality; references Holocaust and communism as moral catastrophes.
• Discussion of America’s founding—Kirk asserts the U.S. was overwhelmingly Christian in origin and values, countering the secular Enlightenment narrative.
• Apologetics segment: defense of the Christian worldview, resurrection evidence, and the distinctiveness of Christianity versus other mythologies.

D. Affirmative Action, Equity, and Racism

(42:27–52:48)

• Students challenge Kirk’s stance on the Civil Rights Act and affirmative action; debate whether affirmative action constitutes “anti-white racism.”
• Kirk likens equity to redistribution—“taking” from one group to “give” to another.
• Critiques the rise of racial essentialism and the return of racial segregation (citing black-only dorms/ceremonies).
• Notable Quote:

  "Your worldview is indistinguishable from the KKK… You want to organize the world based on skin color. We want to organize the world based on merit and character..." (Charlie Kirk, 49:15)

E. Gender, Sex Differences, and Social Consequences

(54:51–89:59)

• Debates on the definition of “woman,” gender as a social versus biological construct, and whether men can give birth.
• Extensive elaboration (with humor) on innate sex differences—behavior, interests, and brain structure—citing research and personal anecdote.
• Discusses the “crisis of unmarried women” and links women’s rising depression rates to modern social roles and workforce participation.
• Consistently argues for policy and cultural norms grounded in biological realities, not modern “gender theory.”
• Humorous Interlude:

  "If you sit down with a young lady, they’re far more likely to talk about microtopics and men are more likely to talk about macro topics." (Charlie Kirk, 79:59)

F. Role of Faith in Politics and Society

(66:01–73:46)

• Faith-based students ask how to balance patriotism, political advocacy, and prioritizing the gospel.
• Kirk: America’s freedom enables Christian mission worldwide; defending the public square is essential for evangelism.
• Stress on U.S. as premier source of missionary activity and aid, making its preservation vital for global Christianity.

G. Societal Purpose, Women’s Rights, and America’s Standing

(74:20–end)

• Kirk promotes marriage, family, and legacy as keys to happiness and purpose, urging young people to embrace traditional milestones.
• Argues against the concept of “patriarchy” as a contemporary systemic oppression, claiming cultural statistics show men also face significant challenges.
• Final calls to activism ("You are doing something bigger than you") and America’s singular greatness in history.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “If you strip someone of their humanity long enough, you will arrive at the chilling conclusion that they don’t deserve to exist at all.”
  –Erika Kirk, 07:35

• “You are why we should eliminate the Department of Education. Thank you very much.”
  –Charlie Kirk to Gender Questioner, 56:04

• “Do you have evidence a C-section is safer?”
  “Yes, it’s self evident... C-sections save lives. They do not terminate lives.”
  –Charlie Kirk & Abortion Questioner, 25:31

• “Your worldview is indistinguishable from the KKK… You want to organize the world based on skin color. We want to organize the world based on merit and character, based on how hard you work, what you bring to the table.”
  –Charlie Kirk, 49:15

• “If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you’re gonna end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you will end up purposeful.”
  –Charlie Kirk, 00:06

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 0:03 — Charlie Kirk’s opening monologue & call to activism
• 3:50–10:42 — Erika Kirk’s testimony on dehumanization, violence, and media
• 10:44–18:40 — Immigration debate: morality, legality, and system capacity
• 18:40–27:52 — Abortion: scriptural and scientific argument
• 27:54–41:55 — Dialogue on atheism, morality, and the American founding
• 42:27–52:48 — Affirmative action, equity vs. merit, and racism debate
• 54:51–62:55 — Defining gender, women’s rights, sex differences
• 66:01–73:46 — The intersection of faith, politics, and spreading the Gospel
• 74:20–end — Closing philosophy, America’s status, and call to legacy

---

Tone and Language

• Candid, combative, and unapologetically conservative, with frequent calls for audience disagreement and open debate.
• Scripture and religious references are frequent, especially to reinforce moral arguments.
• Humor and sharp retorts balancing tense exchanges, sometimes purposefully provocative.
• Frequent invocation of personal stories and national statistics to ground points in both narrative and empirical data.

---

Summary for First-Time Listeners:
This episode captures the essence of Charlie Kirk’s approach: assertive advocacy for traditional values, blending faith, policy, and cultural critique through direct engagement with detractors. The special segment from Erika Kirk provides a somber, emotional context for the stakes of public discourse, while the remainder showcases robust (often adversarial) conversations on some of America’s most divisive topics.

---

Transcript

[Charlie Kirk]

My name is Charlie Kirk. I run the largest pro American student organization in the country, fighting for the future of our republic. My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth. If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're gonna end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you will end up purposeful. College is a scam, everybody. You gotta stop sending your kids to college. You should get married as young as possible and have as many kids as possible. Go start a Turning Point USA College chapter. Go start a Turning Point USA High School chapter. Go find out how your church can get involved. Sign up and become an activist. I gave my life to the Lord in fifth grade. Most important decision I ever made in my life. And I encourage you to do the same. Here I am, Lord. Use me. Buckle up everybody. Here we go. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble gold investments@noblegold investments.com that is noblegoldinvestments.com you guys are welcome to ask anything. Open mic. Disagreement. Most welcome. You disagree, come to the front of the line. You disagree, come to the front of the line. If you disagree, go to the front of the line. You guys know how it works. You disagree, you can go to the line. We'll have a great conversation here.

[Immigration Questioner]

Who are you?

[Charlie Kirk]

My name is Charlie Kirk and I love America.

[Abortion Questioner]

Why are you here?

[Charlie Kirk]

Because I love talking with people I disagree with.

[Abortion Questioner]

What have you done for your country?

[Charlie Kirk]

Started an organization that's now on a thousand plus campuses to save the greatest culture and country ever to exist. I love talking to people I disagree with. When people stop talking, that's when you get violence. That's when civil war happens.

[Widow of Charlie Kirk's Husband]

It seems to me that nothing will ever be enough for the evil in this world. Our country has become unrecognizable. These people have perverted the truth to the point that they motivated the murder of my husband. They have continuously tried to assassinate the President. And anyone who stands in their way is labeled hateful, racist, fascist, and every other trigger word that is grossly dishonest. We want the best for our country. They don't. And this is why Charlie started Turning Point USA in the first place. He didn't trust the radicalized liberal teachers. And this past Saturday, it was a schoolteacher, of all people. A schoolteacher that attempted to change our history for the worst with bullets. And everyone is asking why. I even went to the White House Correspondence Center. And it was because many of the journalists in that room have attempted to dehumanize me. And I wanted to meet some of them face to face. Quite frankly, why have a conversation about me when you can have a conversation with me? So, for example, a journalist from the Daily Mail came up to me. She introduced herself and she was saying, she was very gracious. She was saying, you look so beautiful. I'm so sorry for your loss. To which I replied, it is so nice to put a name to the face, especially with all of the slander, the lies, accusations that are out there surrounding my husband's murder and myself. And I said to her, you know what's so interesting? This is my first time at the White House Correspondence center. And I find it so fascinating, the dynamic that is going on right now because everyone is all dressed up and you guys are co mingling in and out of each other's cocktail parties. And so for one night, you are able to put aside all of your differences for the sake of freedom of speech. And then by Monday morning, things will go back to being an absolute bloodbath between all of you. To which she replied, literally, she said, I know. Isn't it special?

[Abortion Questioner]

Right?

[Widow of Charlie Kirk's Husband]

Isn't tonight so special? And following that conversation, it was time to take our seats and we went into the big ballroom where the dinner was. And one of the first things I noticed when I walked into that room was quite literally the proximity of the opposing outlets to one another. So you have one table here that's Politico, and another table here that's Fox, and another table here that's WaPo. And you're all crammed together elbow to elbow. And to make the night even more of a spectacle, every single 10 person table had 10 bottles of wine. And the president of the White House Correspondents association, she did a great job of trying to make the evening have that feeling of Americana. You know, we were in a room celebrating freedom of speech despite our differences. And the US Marine Band performed the national anthem so beautifully. And then shortly thereafter, gunshots rang out and total chaos ensued. And you guys have all seen what happened next because there are a thousand videos of it. So let's discuss that fact for a second. If you were in that room, you had no way of knowing what the status of the shooter was, how many there were, or honestly, really anything. It was just utter chaos. And so during an active shooting, these journalists are using their phones to find moments to capture for clips. They were so concerned about getting a video in a room with an active shooter that they could have accidentally and quite literally filmed themselves being shot. Many of those people have become so desensitized that fight or flight became secondary to the opportunity of putting themselves into the story, which ironically breaks the number one rule of journalism. And again, ironically enough, the shooter was a teacher. You have these people who are supposed to be teaching our children the future of this country, and he's so unhinged that he is able to teach children by day and then attempt to murder the President of the United States by night. And in his manifesto, he starts by contextualizing himself by saying, I am a citizen of the United States of America. And while we may have big problems with illegal immigration in this country, I have to tell you, we have an even bigger problem when it comes to the systemic indoctrination and radicalization of our own citizens. This is what got my husband killed. This is what has led to three legitimate attempts on President Trump's life. And I can speak firsthand to that unbearable toll that this must take on our First Lady. There has never been a president who has faced this many assassination attempts in Americans entire history. And after each one, the reaction from the far left has been, at best, a shrug and in some cases, a sick disappointment that the shooter was unsuccessful. We are all human beings, and if you can just. If you can just pause and just take a minute and ask yourself, how would you feel if even just one person made cruel jokes about the attempted murder of your loved one? That is what Jimmy Kimmel did to the First Lady. He said that she had the glow of an expected widow. The glow of an expected widow just 48 hours before that nightmare almost became a reality. And this culture we're living in absorbs disagreement as a form of personal betrayal. It turns having an opposing viewpoint into a moral crime worthy of punishment. And here's what I've realized through all of this. Truly having lived through quite literal hell these past seven months, if you strip someone of their humanity long enough, you will arrive at the chilling conclusion that they don't deserve to exist at all. Every morning, I wake up to a new headline lying about me. I have comedians dressing up in whiteface. I have people saying, I'm not fit to be CEO. And I have Candace Owens claiming I murdered my husband. And the list goes on and on and on. There is a serious epidemic of dehumanization plaguing this country. The most unthinkable tragedies have now become commonplace in our daily headlines. And yet the media finds a way to conveniently explain away violence. This is what we're up against. This is what we're up against. What is happening right now is something none of us can afford to ignore. The evil forces working to divide us, to distract us, and to pull us apart has never been stronger. This is a moment for Americans to come together and decide what kind of country we are going to be before we lose our country altogether. In Romans, chapter 12, verse 21, it says, do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good. And this is why my husband created Turning Point usa, so we could have civil discourse and debate and open dialogue. Because when we stop talking to each other, bad things happen. I am choosing to fight for America, for my children, for your children, and for our humanity. Because we all need to do our part. And by the grace of God, we will succeed and America will remain what she was always called to be. A shining city on a hill, a light to the world. So let me give you a perfect example of how it's done. My husband did it best and left us the blueprint on how to have uncomfortable conversations with those who disagree.

[Charlie Kirk]

Buckle up, everybody. Here we go.

[Immigration Questioner]

So my stance today is on immigration. I think that immigration contributes a lot to America. So my parents did come here legally, and they right now are in the process again, and it takes a long time. No, they came here legally. Like, they came with their visa, and now they're renewing it. And it's a different process right now. But. So I'm really religious. I'm Catholic. My parents grew me up that way. And in Matthew 2, 13:15, it talks about how Jesus had to flee Nazareth or, no, Bethlehem. Sorry. He had to flee because someone was going to die and they were looking to kill him. And he had to flee his own country and leave everything behind because the angel spoke to Mary and Joseph that they should leave. So a lot of people do that. That's why they immigrate to the United States. A lot of people have to leave everything behind because not everyone just wants to pack up all the things and leave right now. I personally would hate if I had to sell my car, my house, leave my parents, leave my friends, and leave everyone. So I just want to know what your stance is on that. Just because in the Bible it talks about that.

[Charlie Kirk]

Right? So first of all, Jesus actually didn't emigrate. He stayed within the confines of the Roman Empire because Egypt was actually under Roman jurisdiction. That's a separate point. But there are plenty of verses that says, you should welcome the stranger. And so I will grant you that. I guess the first point, the first point I would have to ask is, should immigration always benefit the home country?

[Immigration Questioner]

I think so, yes. And that is one thing that I looked into. So there are immigrants right now working here. Correct. And they get some of their paycheck cut off. Right. Because of Social Security and all those benefits, but they don't get those benefits because they're illegal.

[Charlie Kirk]

Legal or illegal immigrants. That distinction is very important.

[Immigration Questioner]

Illegal to get those benefits.

[Charlie Kirk]

So let's just be clear. If they have a Social Security number, how'd they get that the right way? They stole it. You don't get a. You don't get a Social Security number as an illegal, period. It does not happen. They stole it, so that's an act of theft. So they stole an American Social Security number to be able to work here, which drives down wages, which drives down opportunity costs. But even beyond that, we just have to look at their action. They were not invited to come to this country. They broke in line, they cut in line. And we should not reward line cutters or border jumpers. We should reward people like your parents that actually came here legally to this country.

[Immigration Questioner]

Yeah, I understand that point. I really do. But sometimes people generally need to leave their country because in like my mother's case, for instance, there was like a terrorist attack on my family. And that's the reason my mom had to come. And thankfully she did get it immediately. But now I've heard of so many stories where people have to wait like 10 years, 20 years, even 30 years. Like my grandma right now is trying to get the process, and thankfully she is now, but it's taken her about 10 years now, and she makes enough money in her country and she just wants to come here as a tourist. That's the main reason. And I do understand that. I think that my main point is that how we should implement more money into the immigration system because Trump's zero tolerance policy, that just felt cruel because there's a lot of people here that are doing well and zero tolerance, they just have to leave the country. I feel like that was impumane of him.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, but it's not their country, though. And that's the. So let me just. Here's. If I went to Mexico without being invited or allowed and I took a job and the Mexican government found out, what would the Mexican government do to me? I'm not sure they would send me back to America.

[Immigration Questioner]

And why was the reason you left the US First?

[Charlie Kirk]

So reason. That's an interesting thing. Is there ever a legitimate Reason, in your opinion, to commit a crime?

[Immigration Questioner]

No.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, then the reason doesn't matter because under that state. So let's. Can you rob a bank because you wish you had more money?

[Immigration Questioner]

No. You work harder.

[Charlie Kirk]

Then why doesn't that moral standard apply to immigration?

[Immigration Questioner]

Because the system is. It isn't doing its job. That's why I think we should implement more money. Because there is some people like. I do get it. You know, some people come here and then I do admit some of them commit crime, but not all of them.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, no. But they're all criminals if they came illegally. That's the distinction. By definition, they're breaking federal law. 8 USC 1312. Just their presence here is against the law. Would you be okay welcoming in 500 million people into America?

[Immigration Questioner]

That's why we should implement the system to understand each case.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, no, you got to. Do you think 500 million people would be too many people?

[Immigration Questioner]

500 million. I don't even think that would fit the United States.

[Charlie Kirk]

I agree. And that's the point, is that if everyone all of a sudden declared that their life was in danger, we'd have to let in, like, all of Nicaragua, all of Honduras, almost all of Venezuela. The standard all of a sudden starts falling apart and we find that people lie about this, they deceive it. Here's my perspective. Why don't we try to empower those people to make the countries they're coming from greater and stronger, else this problem will actually never be fixed at the root level. That makes sense.

[Immigration Questioner]

It does make sense, and I wish it was that easy. So, for instance, I am part Peruvian, and in Peru, so they were having a presidential election, and the president who was going to win was better for the country and would help out a lot more. But since it's corrupt, they made the other president win. They sent him death threats, nearly almost killed him. He had to fake his death and leave. And they jailed her. They jailed her completely. And they let the guy win. That is why it's corrupt. It's hard to fix a country when there's no help towards it. So Peru was. They were rooting for the good president. They were rooting to build their system back up. But the other president, it was rigged. It was completely rigged.

[Charlie Kirk]

So does it make it better or worse if millions of people leave that country for Peru?

[Immigration Questioner]

Can you, like, what do you mean

[Charlie Kirk]

by if 3 million people left Peru? Does Peru get greater or weaker? Stronger or weaker?

[Immigration Questioner]

Neither. I mean, it's in a weak state right now.

[Charlie Kirk]

I mean, it's pretty obvious I'm trying to even say that mass immigration is bad for everybody. It's bad for America and it's bad for the country that people are leaving from. The only difference is that they send back American money through remittances that actually subsidize this entire thing. Let me ask one final question. If somebody comes into America without invitation and they are illegal, what do you think the penalty should be?

[Immigration Questioner]

I think it's humane to look at their case and why they had to leave everything they've ever known.

[Charlie Kirk]

We believe that we should send them back to their country of origin.

[Immigration Questioner]

I just want to make one more final point. So I do understand that. But my final point is that do you agree that we should implement more money to the immigration system?

[Charlie Kirk]

No. I think we should have no immigrants in the country for the next 10 years. We have way too many people in this country. And I'll prove it to you here in California. Your hospitals are overrun, your schools are overrun. Do you guys agree that you have a crowded state right now? California is a cluttered state with social services that are being strained. And we need a pause on all immigration, in my opinion, to metaphorically digest the major meal that we just ate. Or else we are going to have a major, major assimilation problem, cultural problem, cohesion problem, all sorts of issues. And I know this is a provocative thing to say, but immigration is something that you use as a way to benefit the homeland. You don't have to have immigration.

[Immigration Questioner]

But just as an example, my parents came here, like I said, legally zero dollars. And they have benefited so much the country. They have made so much like hundreds and thousands dollars.

[Charlie Kirk]

Praise God. That's the American dream.

[Immigration Questioner]

It is. And it's just like a hard thing to do.

[Charlie Kirk]

And I, I want American born young people from UC Riverside to also have that American dream and not have to compete against foreigners for that. Thank you for your time.

[Immigration Questioner]

Can I say one point?

[Charlie Kirk]

We have a long line. Thank you.

[Immigration Questioner]

Really quick though.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. Again, what is it?

[Atheist Questioner]

Yeah, sorry.

[Immigration Questioner]

Okay. I understand the American dream is hard. My parents, My mom was pregnant, working two jobs one day, and she sacrificed everything and now she has more money than the average American.

[Charlie Kirk]

Praise God. That is the American dream. Thank you very much.

[Immigration Questioner]

It's hard work.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you.

[Abortion Questioner]

I want to talk about the debate of abortion. So I know that it's something very controversial. Some people are pro choice, some people are pro life. Before I start, I want to make sure that I understand your opinion fully. So I don't take, you know, what I've heard online what is your stance on abortion?

[Charlie Kirk]

Life begins at conception.

[Abortion Questioner]

Okay, so where do you so conception? So is that when sperm enters the egg? Is that during.

[Charlie Kirk]

When new DNA is formed?

[Abortion Questioner]

Okay, when new DNA is formed. So the egg by itself you don't think is anything? Sorry, the egg of a woman by

[Charlie Kirk]

itself, do you think it's something, but it's not a life. Correct.

[Abortion Questioner]

Okay, that's okay. So my question is, when you talk about abortion and why you think you so why you support it? Why you don't support it? Sorry, why you don't support it, what do you use as your evidence? You use scientific evidence? Do you talk about the Bible?

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you use both mainly self scientific and self evident reason?

[Abortion Questioner]

Okay, so are you someone who's a follower of the Bible?

[Charlie Kirk]

I am, but that's not relevant to this discussion. But we could talk about it if you like.

[Abortion Questioner]

I find irrelevant because when I'm going to talk about abortion, there's. There's quotes in the Bible that I think support pro choice in my opinion. Bible Exodus, Exodus 21, 22, 25. When men strive together and hit a pregnant woman so that her child come out so miscarriage. But there is no harm to the woman, the one who hit her shall surely be fined as the woman's husband shall impose on him and he shall pay as the judge determine. But if there is harm to the woman, you shall pay life for life, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. So I know that that can be interpreted different ways. The Bible is interpreted many ways. Different. There's different types, different interpretations. But this says if a person causes a miscarriage through a woman, that they will pay for the abortion. So they, they will pay. Another one will punish them.

[Charlie Kirk]

That is not what this law says. But let me just ask, are you a Christian?

[Abortion Questioner]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, then continue. So. So do you believe in the inerrant word of God?

[Abortion Questioner]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, good.

[Abortion Questioner]

Yes. So it says that as the woman's husband shall impose on him and he shall pay as the judges determined. So the judge is determined and it's talking about the husband. So therefore it's talking about a person, not God himself, not his judgment. So it's saying if someone has an abortion, we have the right to choose what to do to them. Right.

[Charlie Kirk]

Didn't you say it was a miscarriage, not an abortion?

[Abortion Questioner]

It says when man strive together and hit a pregnant woman, so that's causing her to lose the baby. That's outside cause. Outside cause. Therefore it could mean abortion. Because some people find that aggressive abortion is through violence, some, such as hitting, because not everyone has access to medical.

[Charlie Kirk]

Was it the intent for them to kill the baby?

[Abortion Questioner]

It's unclarified, so that I cannot tell you it's unclarified. However, what I will say is that it says that it's. The judges determine, the husband determines. So God's not making the choice for us what to do with a person who does that to someone's child, does that to their own child. But it does say that if the woman is harmed, her herself, not the child, then they are liable by God, their life for her life, their foot for her foot. So what I'm saying is if somebody needs an abortion for health care, let's say a woman's baby's not going to make it. And if the baby stays in her womb, she will die. And they refuse her an abortion. They refuse her that health care and she dies. Should the doctor be liable under God?

[Charlie Kirk]

First of all, this. Those instances don't happen. So let's just be clear. No, see, you guys are so propagandized by this. That only happens in a very rare case of the breaking of the uterus.

[Abortion Questioner]

So it does happen.

[Charlie Kirk]

But. No but where the baby is already dead. And that's the point, is that the baby is already dead. That's a removal of a carcass of a baby. Still, medically, abortion, that's incorrect. No, it's not. No, it's not. A removal of a carcass of a baby is not an abortion. Those are two technically different things. It is not a D and E. It is not a D and E is something completely different. But then if you want to talk about scripture, do you think we are bound to all 613 levitical laws?

[Abortion Questioner]

Yes. If you're a follower of the Bible, you cannot pick and choose what you follow.

[Charlie Kirk]

Oh, so do you eat kosher?

[Abortion Questioner]

You cannot pick.

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you eat kosher?

[Abortion Questioner]

No.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, I thought you were bound to all 613 laws.

[Abortion Questioner]

I'm not perfect. I'm sinner. Everyone here is a sinner.

[Charlie Kirk]

But if are we bound to it, do you think Christians should eat kosher

[Abortion Questioner]

to follow the Bible? You cannot pick and choose what you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Of course, but we do believe in a new covenant, Old covenant. So there's three types of Old Testament laws, right? There's ceremonial, they're civil and moral. So ceremonial laws we do not honor civil, we consider moral. We absolutely.

[Abortion Questioner]

Why do humans decide what to follow in God's word?

[Charlie Kirk]

Because Christ actually it's not us, it's not humans. So Paul actually authored in the book of Colossians.

[Abortion Questioner]

That's a human right.

[Charlie Kirk]

Inspired by the Holy Spirit which wrote the Bible, the ordinances of Moses are nailed to the cross. Secondly, Christ our Lord repeated nine out of ten of the nine out of ten of the ten commandments. And he said all the laws of the prophet hang upon the two teachings of Leviticus 19 and Deuteronomy 6. But now I equally have to challenge you with scripture. In Luke 1, when Elizabeth came in contact with Mary and both were babies, what did it say that John the Baptist did?

[Abortion Questioner]

I cannot tell you that he leapt. Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

Do non babies leap?

[Abortion Questioner]

I don't understand the question. I'm gonna be honest.

[Charlie Kirk]

Is it, if it isn't it a baby, then worthy of protection if they're leaping?

[Abortion Questioner]

I suppose, yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

And it was the Greek word breathos, which literally means baby, intentionally used throughout. Hold on. In Jeremiah, it says, I knew you before you were in the womb. In Psalm, I think 139. It's one of the most intricate verses about the detail of our formation process as human beings. And finally, because of science, because of biology, we know that human life begins at that spark of new DNA. And God says, do not murder. And it's incumbent on Christians to therefore protect that life.

[Abortion Questioner]

Okay, so my biggest question is, I'm not saying that all abortion is valid. I feel like that's up for everyone to decide. But in the most, even if it's very small percentage, in the very small percentage that a baby is alive, but it has to be aborted for the sake of the mother. What do you think?

[Charlie Kirk]

C section. What is a C section?

[Abortion Questioner]

A C section is when you cut a mother's.

[Charlie Kirk]

Why don't they do that instead of the abortion?

[Abortion Questioner]

Because it could be equally as dangerous.

[Charlie Kirk]

Wrong. It's much safer than an abortion and quicker.

[Abortion Questioner]

Do you have evidence?

[Charlie Kirk]

I mean, yes, it's, it's, it's self evident.

[Abortion Questioner]

Can you tell me?

[Charlie Kirk]

I mean, again, I, I, there's plenty of people, he has plenty of people that are in medicine can tell you. But like to be very clear, think about it. Every hospital is equipped to do C sections. You have to go to a specific place for an abortion. And a C section, one third out of everyone in this audience was born by C section. C sections save lives. They do not terminate lives. And so when they say we must abort the baby, thanks to modern technology, that's actually a false choice. You could take the baby out of the environment and try to save its life. As a cesarean section, what if when

[Abortion Questioner]

the C section happens, the baby's not able to survive on its own no matter what.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, well, then that's a separate circumstance. It's like saying if the baby has a heart attack after the C section, that's not a reason not to terminate it.

[Abortion Questioner]

What do you mean?

[Charlie Kirk]

If you have to give everybody a chance at life, you don't kill the baby in the womb just because you think that it's going to. Well, it could hurt the mother. You take it out of that environment.

[Abortion Questioner]

Okay, but what I'm saying is if they take the baby out and they know it's not going to survive regardless,

[Charlie Kirk]

how do they know that? Post 22 weeks, you don't know that. There's miracles that happen every day in the neonatal. Hold on. In the neonatal intensive care unit. There's miracles that happen every day in NICUs.

[Abortion Questioner]

And I agree, there's definitely. They don't know 100% for sure, but there's definitely probability through science, through biology that they know, hey, this is more likely going to happen.

[Charlie Kirk]

We don't do morals on probability.

[Abortion Questioner]

I'm not saying it's morality. I'm saying probability of a baby is going to survive or doesn't matter.

[Charlie Kirk]

You don't terminate a life based on a probability of survival. Oh, you do. Interesting. You guys. You guys murder people based on probability of survival. Interesting. So somebody on a ventilator should just be murdered. I mean, it's such incredible morality.

[Abortion Questioner]

Would you keep someone on a ventilator for the entirety of everything else then?

[Charlie Kirk]

It depends. There's two different things. There's no more and not yet. Once you reach the level of no more human, human interventions can improve this person's life or bring them back to a full life. That is a separate moral decision. Then not yet. When a human being is at not yet, which they are in the womb, you must do everything you can to make sure they get life. When a human being is at no more, it's a completely separate moral dimension and decision to make no more and not yet are the ways to look at pro life decision. Does that make sense?

[Abortion Questioner]

Yes, that makes sense. Well, thank you for debating with me.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you very much.

[Abortion Questioner]

Agree to disagree.

[Atheist Questioner]

I have a friend named Thomas Sheedy. He is the founder of a organization called Atheists for Liberty. He is openly conservative, but he's mostly interested in atheist activism and normalizing atheism in all sects, including the conservative movement. He seems to be under the impression that a lot of conservatives, including you, are more hesitant to work with atheist organizations. Is there any, any truth to that?

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes and no. I mean, if you're an atheist and you want to be part of the conservative movement, go ahead. But you must be an honest atheist and acknowledge that morality is definitionally subjective without a belief in God. You cannot be an atheist and believe in objective morality. It is an impossibility. And true atheists will acknowledge this at some point. You have an ought claim. Well, things ought to be a certain way. We as Christians are we that believe in the divine. We have is claims that murder is wrong. Whereas an atheist will say, well, murder ought to be wrong because you can't have an objective definition if there is not a divine eternal power over you. So look, if an atheist wants to fight alongside of us to end abortion or to try and end the massacring of our kids, that's called gender affirming care. And if an atheist wants to march alongside of us to say no men in female sports, they're more than welcome to be able to do that. But atheists for liberty is an interesting phrase because I don't believe you can have liberty without God because liberty is not man's idea, it is God's idea. That's just my own personal belief. And it's also the belief of everything that built this nation. But yes, I know a lot of good atheists. The question though is how do you know they're good? It's because you're appealing to a moral authority above just the secular material realm, one that is transcendent, we would believe, given by God.

[Atheist Questioner]

Well, I don't believe in objective morality. I do know there are plenty of atheists who are moral objectivists.

[Charlie Kirk]

Are you an atheist? Sorry to interrupt, but.

[Atheist Questioner]

Oh yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, cool. So let me just. Can I ask you a question? And I don't mean I know this is your first time at the mic, so I'm just gonna try to be tender in doing this. So you don't believe in objective morality, right?

[Atheist Questioner]

I personally don't. Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

Was the Holocaust objectively wrong?

[Atheist Questioner]

Objectively, no, but it'd been better if it didn't happen because most people wouldn't want that to happen.

[Charlie Kirk]

So that's, that's where we, that's where we are on different planets. And that's okay. I'm not trying to make fun of you. I'm trying to be graceful in the way that we're going about this. Do you think Hitler was objectively evil?

[Atheist Questioner]

No, because it's subjective.

[Charlie Kirk]

But I just hope all of you guys understand he's Being an honest atheist to your credit, because as an atheist you're not allowed to say anything is objectively right or wrong. I come from a worldview that when you butcher 6 million people, that is objectively wrong no matter what. And, and it's very important, it's a very important truth claim. Because when you do not have objective truth anchoring your society, then it becomes a power struggle. If you do not have truth, then power will reign. Whoever can get the most amount of power then ends up having the most amount of say over society. We believe what is objectively right, true, good and beautiful should be transcendent over society. Your thoughts?

[Atheist Questioner]

So do you believe objective morality specifically comes from the Bible?

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes and no. It's also, it's in nature and the Bible explains nature. So objective morality can be discovered in many different cultures and societies, pointing towards what we believe is the ultimate objective truth, Jesus Christ. C.S. lewis explained this the best in his book Abolition of Man, which is that almost every religion talks about a certain way to live, a dao or a path that we should be on. And so more simply than just the Bible, we believe in what the founders believed, which is an ethical monotheism, that there is one God. He has a general way that he wants you to live. For example, murdering is bad, kidnapping is wrong. Defense of the innocent. And we should do our best to try to live alongside of that path.

[Atheist Questioner]

Okay, well I think those are very interesting examples. You bring up the founders, you bring up Hitler, but Hitler was a self proclaimed Catholic and he called called Nazism a Christian movement.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, I would be careful saying that he was. He was not. That's okay.

[Atheist Questioner]

He called himself a Catholic. He said, he specifically said in 1927 Our movement is Christian. They had on the belt buckles, God on our side, yet they had to swear to the almighty God. Atheists were not trusted to be in the ss.

[Charlie Kirk]

Even if I grant you that despite the fact that he killed a lot of pastors and priests. And there of course you can pervert things in the name of God. No one denounces that. Just as a side note though, far more people died under the banner of atheism than Christianity in the 20th century. Mao was an atheist, Stalin was an atheist, Pol Pot was an atheist, believing in no God actually led to the destruction and the murder of well over 100 million people. And that's fine. So again, if atheists want to come alongside us as conservatives and fight for what is good, that is great. But I will never acknowledge that atheists can tell me what is objectively good. They can only give me a preference. They cannot tell me what is right. And preferences eventually will lead you towards moral and societal decline.

[Atheist Questioner]

Okay, so I think you just listed a bunch of communists. And it's worth acknowledging the vast majority of atheists are not communists, just like the vast majority of Christians are not theocrats who don't support the divine right. It's also worth acknowledging that the founders were actually inspired by Enlightenment values, not by the Bible. America was founded as a secular nation. We were the first quote unquote godless Constitution.

[Charlie Kirk]

Again, I've done this so many times, so I don't know if we want to waste our time doing this, but 55 out of 56 of the signers of the Declaration were Bible believing church attending Christians. 9 out of 13 of the states at the time of ratification require a declaration of faith in order for you to serve in the States. We were. Our birth certificate, which is the Mayflower Compact said explicitly we are here to spread Christianity throughout the land. It was the first great revival that led to to the American Revolution of Jonathan Edwards and Jonathan Mayhew and George Whitfield that preached all across the eastern seaboard. John Adams famously said, the Constitution is written solely for a moral and religious people. It's wholly inadequate for the people of any other. We were a Christian nation that was able to embrace the idea of a free society. God is mentioned four times in the Declaration of Independence. Not only that, Jesus Christ is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence where it says we appeal to the divine judge of the universe, which of course is a direct appeal to Jesus. In the Book of Revelation. He yes, there were rationalist Enlightenment values that informed some of the Founders, but it irrefutably was a Christian nation. Maryland was Catholic, Pennsylvania was Quaker. Almost every state had their own specific type of Christian preference. The idea of an atheist or not believing in any God was an idea that was so foreign to the Founders. Even Thomas Jefferson, the great deist, he revered the Bible, albeit with some significant edits. However, the idea of believing in no cosmological or no axiological or no teleological or, or no ontological being would be a concept that our Founding Fathers and not just find foreign. They would find it extraordinarily dangerous. Why? Because the French Revolution was happening simultaneously as the American Revolution, which was explicitly atheist. They actually recreated their own Gods and had they said we are going to appeal to what the God of reason, and this is my final contention is that when I talk to atheists, the French Revolution is A great example. They literally tried to change the Gregorian calendar to a 10 day week. They went and imprisoned people of faith, they put priests in jail, all these different sorts of things. They said, we are going to appeal to the God of reason. Well, how did that work out? It worked out with the guillotine and the slaughter of tens of thousands of people. The French Revolution was one of the greatest disasters in human recorded history. Contrast that with the American Revolution. Why did the American Revolution create the greatest nation ever to exist in the history of the world? And the French Revolution resulted in a lot of blood and even the killing of their own once leader, Maximilien Robespierre. Because we were anchored on Christian ideas. If you are not anchored on Christian ideas, then don't be surprised. And all of a sudden there is no fruit to the harvest that you're trying to create.

[Atheist Debater]

I'm an atheist, so I disagree with your religious claims.

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you believe in absolute truth?

[Atheist Debater]

I'm not sure you can provide me just positive evidence that there is absolute truth. So the answer would be I'm not sure.

[Charlie Kirk]

Are you. Are you absolutely not sure?

[Atheist Debater]

I'm not sure if I'm absolutely not sure. See, this works if you say no, but it doesn't work if you bottom out in the I'm not, I don't know question.

[Charlie Kirk]

Right? No, but saying you're not sure is it. You are not even sure if you're not sure. So at some point you're just always have to make a truth claim. Yeah.

[Atheist Debater]

No, you can just be not sure about everything all the way down. I don't see why you can't. And my answer would be, I think truth is instrumentalist in theory. I think it's a thing we choose pragmatically for the purposes of discussion. I think you can say, yeah, I think truth exists pragmatically. Regardless of that, I don't see how you get to God.

[Charlie Kirk]

Are you alive?

[Atheist Debater]

Huh?

[Charlie Kirk]

Are you alive?

[Atheist Debater]

I think I'm alive, yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

Think you're alive?

[Atheist Debater]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

Is the sun. Is the sun shining?

[Atheist Debater]

I think it's shining, yeah. From my frame of reference, it is shining. Notice, notice how none of this. I mean, notice how you've gotten no steps closer to proving God.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, I'm asking questions, man. Yeah, but are you sure we did it?

[Atheist Debater]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

Are you sure we.

[Atheist Debater]

I'm sure. I'm pr. I'm sure. In the pragmatic instrument, how sure are you that we didn't in the pragmatic instrumentalist sense? Absolutely sure. I see truth as a utility.

[Charlie Kirk]

So there is a Truth. That's absolute.

[Atheist Debater]

No, it's. It's instrumental.

[Charlie Kirk]

You just said it was absolute.

[Atheist Debater]

No, absolutely sure. In the instrumentalist sense of the word. Truth. This is a philosophical tradition that dates back hundreds of years. Instrumentalism.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah. Which of course we don't subscribe to, obviously. So do you believe that murder is objectively wrong?

[Atheist Debater]

Epistemologically objective or ontologically objective?

[Charlie Kirk]

Morally.

[Atheist Debater]

See, you didn't answer the question. But both.

[Charlie Kirk]

Both epistemologically and ontologically, but for the purpose of discussion.

[Atheist Debater]

Okay, so by what you mean. No, I don't think it's objective.

[Charlie Kirk]

Was Hitler a bad person? Objectively, no.

[Atheist Debater]

If you mean by. By the way. By the way.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, no, but he's being honest at its core. Atheists cannot.

[Atheist Debater]

Wait, can I make the claim now? Notice who here is relying on feelings and not facts? Your argument is I feel that Hitler was objective.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, I know.

[Atheist Debater]

No, no, you feel that way. Can you provide me evidence of how you know? Can you provide me evidence that morality is objective?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, of course I can, because. Well, first of all, morality is both reason and revelation. And it's built within to us that murder is wrong.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Yeah.

[Atheist Debater]

Okay, where's the evidence of that? Is that that's a claim, not evidence. That's a claim.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. We could, we could spend multiple hours, but in the western tradition.

[Atheist Debater]

So notice how you're saying by tradition, by standards. I just want all claims of non truth value.

[Charlie Kirk]

Hold on. Yes, they are. We believe that truth was revealed to us. We believe claim by God. Hold on, but let me, let me. We can get there. You can keep on interrupting us.

[Atheist Debater]

Okay, keep on.

[Charlie Kirk]

But let me prove to you how silly your viewpoint is.

[Immigration Questioner]

Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

And how self evidently wrong.

[Atheist Debater]

Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

Is it objectively wrong to kids when

[Atheist Debater]

you say objective, what I mean by objective? Once again. Once again.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Dude, can I ask you something?

[Atheist Debater]

No, no, no. Notice how you still haven't given me dispositive evidence of morality's objective. You're merely saying my answer is I feel that way. Sure, I feel that way.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, no, that's all. I think it's objectively wrong to the laws of nature.

[Atheist Debater]

What law of nature?

[Charlie Kirk]

The self evident nature of existence.

[Atheist Debater]

Where is there a proof that itself? Show me the logical proof that it's self evident.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. It's in your reason that God gave you. And the consciousness proves that God gave it to me.

[Atheist Debater]

Prove that God gave it to me.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, but again, your existence is proof of that. Again, we can get back down to the first principles of this, but.

[Atheist Debater]

We can. But you don't want to because, you know, it doesn't look good.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, it looks actually really good because

[Atheist Debater]

you have evidence for it built within.

[Charlie Kirk]

Again, interrupting does not make you right.

[Atheist Debater]

So you keep repeating your point. I get your point.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, I don't. So let me ask you a question in closing. Since you can't objectively say that Hitler was bad or that child is wrong, so how did the universe come into existence?

[Atheist Debater]

I don't know.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, but science says that it was a big bang or a beginning point, right? Okay, so using logic, which you believe

[Atheist Debater]

in is the column cosmological argument.

[Charlie Kirk]

Hold on. Again, you keep interrupting. Using. Using logic. If space, time and matter had a starting point, then logically, shouldn't something outside of space, time and matter have started those things? Things.

[Atheist Debater]

How do you know that cause is personal? How do you know that cause is worth praying to?

[Charlie Kirk]

How do you know anything? That's not the question.

[Atheist Debater]

Wait, wait. Okay, sure, there is a cause.

[Charlie Kirk]

Oh, that causes God because it's outside of space, time and man.

[Atheist Debater]

No, no, no. But by definition, you believe in different things about God. You think that God is personal.

[Charlie Kirk]

That's not. That's not what we're debating.

[Atheist Debater]

No, we are arguing about God. We're arguing about Christian is a religion.

[Charlie Kirk]

Hold on. No, no, we're not debating. We're debating whether or not there's a God or not.

[Atheist Debater]

No, the Christian God. I said religion that. You're a religious person, you're a Christian in nature, follow religious tradition.

[Charlie Kirk]

Calm down. You said you're an atheist.

[Atheist Debater]

Wait, no. God. God, historically, Aquinas even defines it this way, is a personal God. You still haven't gotten to me personal.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm happy to get to that.

[Atheist Debater]

Okay, then get to it.

[Charlie Kirk]

Look, here's what I find with atheists. They don't want to worship or acknowledge God because many atheists think they are God. And you embody that really well.

[Atheist Debater]

I didn't know you were a mind reader, Charlie. This is news to me.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's not a mind reader. I could tell by your behavior. I will say this. I hope that you give your life to Jesus Christ. I. I hope you do.

[Atheist Debater]

I hope you can find evidence. I hope you can find.

[Charlie Kirk]

You know what's interesting? There is evidence. There is evidence that Jesus. Hold on. Last thing. Do you believe Jesus Christ was a real historical figure?

[Atheist Debater]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you believe that the Gospels are historically accurate and we can prove them with archaeological evidence?

[Atheist Debater]

Some parts are. Some parts are. Some parts are metaphors, some parts are allegories, some parts are literal. It Depends. Some parts are attempts at history. Which book?

[Charlie Kirk]

Using rational analysis. Why would the disciples lie about the resurrection of Christ?

[Atheist Debater]

Okay, we can talk about this. People. They can be mistakenly, mistakenly wrong about it.

[Charlie Kirk]

So they would be mistakenly wrong up to the point where they get martyred.

[Atheist Debater]

The whole point of being crucified. The whole point of being mistakenly wrong about something is you believe it's true

[Charlie Kirk]

all the way up until the point of death.

[Atheist Debater]

The whole point of being mistakenly wrong about something is you believe.

[Charlie Kirk]

I just want to make sure I understand your position. Your position is that the 12 disciples who knew Christ best, saw him die, and then they all believed a mistaken conspiracy for the rest of their life. Yes. All of them together as a conspiracy?

[Atheist Debater]

Yes. Yeah. Yes. There is no firsthand account from the 500. The Gospels are all written by these people. People have died for crazy claims in the past that we know aren't true. These are all facts about history.

[Charlie Kirk]

Not correct. Okay. One of the Gospels was written by one of his closest associates, Matthew, the tax collector. Luke was a fact fighter that was hired.

[Atheist Debater]

No, I didn't say the Gospels weren't written by them. I said there's no evidence from the 500 that he appeared to. There's no firsthand accounts.

[Charlie Kirk]

Again, that's not correct. Thank you for your time. We'll get to the next question you cannot answer. We will pray for you. Thank you. Be respectful, guys. He can do what he wants.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, can I start now? Oh. Nice to meet you, Charlie. I'm a big fan. I think you're a very beautiful man. I admire you physically, but. No. No homo. No homo. No homo. I did have a question. Question. Something I don't find very interesting about you, something I find kind of repulsive, is that I believe you said that the Civil Rights act was bad and that we shouldn't have that.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, well, thank you.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I appreciate that. I don't like you as much as Charlie, though.

[Charlie Kirk]

First of all, what's your name? Oh.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, sorry. I don't want to be, like, filmed and stuff. I'm anonymous number one anonymous guy.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. Well, hello. Nice to meet you, anonymous guy.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Thank you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Nice to meet you, too.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, I believe in part of the essence of the Civil Rights act went way too far, way too wide.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, how did it go too far?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, for example, it created an entire civil rights leviathan that gave us affirmative action.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Civil rights leviathan. What do you mean?

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes, if you can let me finish three words in.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Sorry.

[Charlie Kirk]

It allowed the Department of Justice to go after people that have different Skin color, AKA white people, and prevent them from getting jobs in college admissions. You have a job. I'm sorry? You have a job. No, you're right. I do. Right. But just until Trump came around. Until these Supreme Court decision, thanks to the Civil Rights act, if you have white skin color, it's much harder to get into a college than if someone has black skin color. Much harder. You have to get higher test scores. It's a much harder pool, largely thanks to the precedent set by the Civil Rights act, not to mention all the trans stuff that we're seeing. We're seeing men be able to win trophies and medals from women across the country, and they use the Civil Rights act to justify it.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay, I think I see where you're coming from. So you think that it's hard. Harder for white people because black people, they have. They could have lower tech scores. Again, it's not what I think.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's the fact that's what you're saying.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay. All right.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Well, I guess what I would say, too, I think perhaps you're familiar with the term equity, right, where different people have different circumstances.

[Charlie Kirk]

I reject.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Whether you reject it or not, I think it's a prescient concept in this argument because what you have to understand is that when you, for example, you're born in, like, a black neighbor. You're born like O block or something. Like a very, very. Like a. You don't know what O block is. Oh, well, if you're, if you're, if you're born there, if you're born in a very poor area like that, with, like, very low economic activity, very, very poor schools are very low ratings where the average test score is much lower. When you're in that environment, you have the whole system up against you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Right.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

So it. So when you say in that kind of circumstance, when you're facing the whole, I guess, leviathan of systemic racism, so you say that. Sorry, let me just. When you say it's fair to, for example, lower the standard because knowing that their circumstances were like that, perhaps based on what they had, was presented to them, they had the correct amount of merit to get into a school.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, so are you a student here? I'm guessing you are.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, yeah, yeah, I'm a student here.

[Charlie Kirk]

Are you pretty good student?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, yeah, I would say I'm a good student. I have a pretty high gpa.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. Can you give your GPA to her because she's a woman of color, please?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, well, you want me to give you a. I mean, I can.

[Charlie Kirk]

Would you be willing to do that?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Sure. Yeah, sure.

[Charlie Kirk]

You'd be good? You would cool with that?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Yeah, I'm fine. Wait, give. Wait.

[Charlie Kirk]

I want you tell her or like. No, by force. So we're swapping. Let me tell what I'm going to do by force, white man.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm going to take your gpa. I'm going to give it to a woman of color.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

You're cool with that?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I mean, yeah, I can just work back up like.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, there's no working back up.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I can pull myself up by my bootstraps.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, there's no working back up.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

What do you mean you can't work back up? That's the whole point of conservatism.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm going to keep on taking it from you because that's equity. And you're cool with that?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

What? But that's not.

[Charlie Kirk]

This is equity in practice.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Equity isn't taken. Equity is giving. Applying the equal standard.

[Charlie Kirk]

If you give, how do you get? You must take and then you get.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Wait, what do you mean?

[Charlie Kirk]

That which is given must first be taken.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

What's being taken?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, in this case, grades from you to grades to her.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

That's. No one's taking my grades, though. That's not what. That's not what. Affirmative action.

[Charlie Kirk]

Hold on.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

No one takes your grades?

[Charlie Kirk]

Hold on a second. If you only have so many. You only have so many positions at University of South Florida to come in, right? There's a set number. Let's say it's 20,000 people, okay? And we're gonna say we're gonna lower the test standards so that somebody that's a woman of color can come in. And therefore, it's harder for you. So it's a higher bar for you, lower bar for them. Definitionally, that's a redistribution of test scores to somebody else, just by the definition. And you're okay with that?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Well, I guess I would ask then if we were to do what you're doing. I guess that's what's happening under Trump, right?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, no, it's actually been happening last 40 years.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay. Actually, yeah, whatever. Okay, so when you say that, if you do that, then, well, black people aren't gonna get into school and then they won't be able to uplift themselves. They won't be to have prosperous families. They won't be able to, you know, equalize the economic status because you need to give them a little jump start, you know? You have a car, right?

[Charlie Kirk]

How is that? How is that? Oh, no, now I know you are.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

No, no, no, no, no, it's good, but no.

[Charlie Kirk]

How has that worked? The last 40 years, we've had robust affirmative action. We've had hiring practices. Has it made black American America more successful?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I can answer that easily. It's because. Oh, sorry. It's because. Sorry, what am I. What am I going for?

[Charlie Kirk]

I don't know.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

You're a funny guy. So what happened is even after the Civil Rights act you're under. You know what I believe? I believe the term is massive resistance. It was a movement in. After the Broad versus Board of Education in Virginia, where essentially the legislature, which was still white supremacists, which is still extremely racist, they decide that, no, we're going to do everything that feasibly possible within our means to stop black people from going to white schools. You even see this in. I believe it was the Little Rock nine, right. Even after it was legalized at the state level, white supremacist mobs still mobilized to prevent it. So even if it, de facto, it's gone de jure, it still exists.

[Charlie Kirk]

Let me ask you a very simple question, a term you keep on throwing around.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Got you.

[Charlie Kirk]

What is racism?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

What is racism? That's a very complicated question, but no, it's not. I mean, there's a simple answer and then there's the highly theoretical.

[Charlie Kirk]

Give me the simple.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

The simple answer will essentially be because. Because we have, like, different skin colors, that he's treated a different way than me. He has, like, a different upbringing to me.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, no, no. But what is racism different in practice?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, it's discrimination based on the color. Based on the color of the skin. Yeah, got it.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you. So isn't it racist then to then penalize white people to come into college or to get job color of their skin? Wouldn't that be racist? So you're arguing for a very racist policy, which is that we should actively discriminate against people based on the color of their skin, which is affirmative action in dei. In practice.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I just don't. I just disagree with the premise that you can do, like, anti white racism. Because.

[Charlie Kirk]

Because. Wait, can you be racist against white people?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

No, bro. I'm a cracker, bro. What the. No, you can't be racist, bro. There's so many crackers here, right? There's your clip, bro. There's your clip. Well, what are you gonna. You're gonna do political violence to me, bro? Like, why are you saying that to me? You're making me scared.

[Charlie Kirk]

So let me tell you what we believe because you tell us what you believe. Your worldview is indistinguishable from the kkk that you want. That you want to organize the world based on skin color. We want to organize the world based on merit and character, based on how hard you work, what you bring to the table. I believe it's destructive and wrong to say that people are going to be organized or have their future set based on the color of their skin. I think it's tribalistic. I think it is divisive, and I think it hurts the excellence of a country. You asked a question. Well, how are we going to help other communities? You know how you help other communities? Stop pandering to them and start treating them like individuals made in the image of God, not tribes to be organized for political purposes.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay, so do you think, like, when Trump is now nice president, now that racism is gone, now because Trump is back, we're no longer pandering? Right. Do you think that the conditions of black people have like. Do you think O Block is going to become like a much nicer place? Do you think that. Do you think that these are very downturned, sort of black neighborhoods that have been sort of left behind? Do you think they're going to become revitalized now? Is that what you think is going to happen?

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, they'll do better for sure.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

You think they do better now that we've stopped helping them? They're going to do better.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, see, that's an interesting thing because

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

that seems like, contradictory to me. Just basic logic.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, actually, black Americans under Donald Trump in the first term saw the greatest economic renaissance that they saw since the 1950s. You don't think Obama lowest unemployment, revitalization, amazing investment in their communities, opportunity zones.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

But that's when we had affirmative action that be bad.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, again, we actually got rid of affirmative action.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Now I'm talking about before.

[Charlie Kirk]

Those are unrelated things, though.

[Atheist Debater]

Just.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

They don't seem unrelated to me. Well, affirmative action addressing racism.

[Charlie Kirk]

Affirmative action is again, so.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I'm sorry, I don't mean to interrupt you.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, you are. That's okay.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I'm sorry.

[Charlie Kirk]

Affirmative action is largely federal government hiring practices and the adjacent institutions. I think that all communities will do even better when we stop living under the soft bigotry of low expectations. Inherent in your argument is that we have to pander to certain communities based on the color their skin because they can't do as well as white people. I reject the premise. I think that we should try to say, I don't care about the color skin. I care about what you bring to the table and stop Pandering to people based on special criteria points and acceptance to college, saying that we're gonna make it easier for one group and harder for another group.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

I don't think it's pandering though. I think it's understanding.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, but understanding. Do you think circumstances.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

You're working based on that?

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you think that we should have black only dormitories in America?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

No, why would I want that?

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, well, there's hundreds of schools that have those actually.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Black only. Like they're not. White people are not allowed.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, white people are not allowed.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

White people. Yeah, that's why I said white people are not allowed.

[Charlie Kirk]

Correct. We have black only graduation ceremonies across the country. Well, those are from.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Well, I believe those are Most likely like HBCUs, right?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, like the University of Michigan has one. Harvard has one. So we're agreeing that that is wrong. That is the furthest extension of hyper, hyper race obsession. So you have to. You can, you could choose one or the other. You can be race obsessed or merit obsessed. We as conservatives decide to be merit obsessed to build a country based on how hard you work and what you're able to deliver.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay, well, so wait here, just. I was.

[Charlie Kirk]

Final point.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Yeah, final point.

[Charlie Kirk]

Sure.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay. This thing's a little close. Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend your wonderful setup here. Yeah. So I guess I'll just restate my point that I don't believe. You mentioned like all black dormitories. Right. I mean, I don't really comment on that. I mean, I don't know if that's real. To me that sounds fake, but I'll give you the benefit of doubt here.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's very real.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay. But I just think it's a very irrelevant kind of like aesthetic focus thing. It doesn't really affect the material conditions of like black people.

[Charlie Kirk]

If you heard there were white only dormitories, there'd be marching in the streets.

[Atheist Debater]

Right.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Oh, well, because. Okay, I get that. The difference is like for example, if you want to go back to segregation, the all white dormitory was nice as an all black one was. So if that's the. If that's. If that was brought back. Okay. If we were to do all white dormitory and all black.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm not recommending it. I think actually segregation is wrong and evil and we're heading until Donald Trump. We were heading in that direction until.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

But like. Okay, I'll go back because I did I let slip by. But you mentioned that like in the early years of the Donald Trump presidency. Right. That the conditions with employment and stuff were going up for black people. What I would say is the economy works slow, works out like a time dilation for policies initially enacted. So what I would. I would probably assume, based on what you said to me, is that it was the Obama era policies that would. That actually led to that, not the Trump policies. Because stuff like tax cuts doesn't really help.

[Charlie Kirk]

In a year from now, we're gonna have the greatest economy ever. They're say it's all Biden. It's all Biden.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Well, I mean, if we. I don't think that's gonna happen. I personally think the economy is going to. With what all Elon Musk is doing. But if that. If that was to happen, I mean, I guess my whole worldview, but I'm

[Charlie Kirk]

pretty certain about what about Elon. What Elon's doing bothers you. Do you. Do you not want to see the government efficient?

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

The government is efficient. He's just firing everybody. Looks like he did the Twitter, but y' all see what happened. The Twitter brats, braces as. Now he's at the Nazi haven. It went from, like, a pretty, pretty accepting place to like, what? Like, we're like, the average blue check mark is saying hail Hitler. Like, Elon Musk himself has replied to, like, people. He did the Nazi salute. Like, we're not going to forget about that, are we?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, he didn't.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Y' all didn't see that clip, right? Y' all see when he did that? All right. Oh, okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank. And by the way, I just want to thank you for something.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

You're welcome.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, I want to thank you.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Do I get. Do I get a portion of, like, the TikTok revenue you get from this?

[Charlie Kirk]

I want to thank you. I want to thank you for something. Oh, yeah, you. You are a perfect reminder why we won in November. So thank you for that. I really appreciate it. Thank you. So you would say I'm a misinformation machine. That's fine. Yeah, fine. You're a teacher. Yes. What is a woman?

[Gender Questioner]

What is a woman? Oh, buddy. All right. So we define gender as a set of preferences that you have.

[Charlie Kirk]

Excuse.

[Gender Questioner]

Gender. Gender is a set of preferences. We have woman. Woman is a social construction that we've agreed upon. Typically, we imagine womanhood as makeup or whatever it is. There is a difference between the word woman and being a biological female. Woman is a social construct that we use. Listen for a second. I'm telling you what it means. Woman. Woman is a social construct. We agree on these set of preferences. If I tell you that I'm a man is because I want you to know that I like these set of preferences. If I tell you I'm a woman, it's because I want you to know that I agree with these set of preferences.

[Charlie Kirk]

Can men give birth?

[Gender Questioner]

Can men? Or can males? Because males can't these. Listen for a second. If you listen to your bio professors, you'd understand there's a difference between biology and what we think.

[Charlie Kirk]

So I want to thank you for proving a great point. You are why we should eliminate the Department of Education. Thank you very much. You are here making a Trump. This is a pro Trump speech for you. This has nothing to do with genders. Well, it has a lot of children. I'll talk about it. You're sitting here telling me how much you love. Have a great day. God bless. I'll pray for you. Oh, my goodness. That will help a lot. Prayer is a powerful thing. Yes, it is. It has done horrendous things to the prayer has done horrendous things to this planet through Christianity and through a lot of other religions. Narrow minded religions have caused a lot of pain and suffering on this planet. More people have died over the last 100 years under the guise of Marxism and statism than any other ideology. Not even close. More people, 100 million people died under communism the last hundred years. 100 million? Yeah. 60 in Mao's Chinese, 30 in Stalin's Russia, 2 million in Pol Pot's Cambodia, at least 200,000 in Cuba. I can keep going. I'm not preaching communism here. No, but I'm saying more people have died under status. Nothing about children. You're telling me how much you support Trump and how much communism. I'll talk about whatever you want to talk about. It's your conversation. So what do you believe? I believe that there's a remedy for situations and not a political. I believe that if we work together and open our minds instead of militarizing ourselves, we could come up with a solution. Isn't talking how we come to solutions? Sure, but getting mad and making political stances on who you love and what the President's doing is so great and what the Hamas is doing. So that is not a conversation, it's a statement. Well, I'll have a conversation when I didn't have time. Awesome. Maybe we could have a conversation in the history bullet sometime. About what? Maybe we could have a conversation in the history building sometime. Yes. History will tell us that when government grows too big, people suffer and die. Yes, that's what the history building should tell you History will also tell you. History will also tell us we live in the greatest country ever to exist. History will also tell you that Western civilization is the greatest miracle that humans ever did. Western history will tell you that any history will tell you that. Western history will tell you that. Tell me any history is a false. I have to be in class, so I would really love to continue. God bless you. Thank you. Do you say it's a lie? We're just kind of talking. Yeah. Similar. It's similar. Yeah. So America is the greatest country ever to exist? Not even close. What country would you say is the greatest. What makes the country great, most productive, most accepting, most generous, most benevolent? Yes. We take in half the world's immigrants every single year. How is this not accepted? What does that have to do about not being accepted?

[Immigration Questioner]

Who are you?

[Charlie Kirk]

My name is Charlie Kirk. And I love America because I love talking with people I disagree with. Started an organization that's now on a thousand plus campuses to save the greatest culture and country ever to exist.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Hires vets and hires vets and hires vets.

[Charlie Kirk]

And I've had thousands of hours of conversation about these ideas. Is it necessary? Well, considering I've been assaulted, followed, stalked and had things thrown at me, the greatest protection I have is cameras. It's a public space. One second, I want to wrap this up. It's all good, but what country would you say is greater than this one? I just said, I mean, we take

[Abortion Questioner]

in half your definition of great.

[Immigration Questioner]

I mean we are the United States of America.

[Abortion Questioner]

Has always done. Has always made the greatest decision because nobody's perfect, right?

[Charlie Kirk]

I never said America was a perfect country ever. Nor have we. We've made a lot of mistakes. No, no, no, no, no. That's not what I've said.

[Abortion Questioner]

Why do you go to that extreme?

[Charlie Kirk]

Because from an objective analysis, correct a world history. Hello, how are you?

[Faith-Based Conservative Questioner]

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

We are the most creative, the most accepting, the most benevolent, the most generous, most forward thinking and productive country ever to exist. We are a country that sent 37,000 of our own citizens to die on the Korean peninsula so South Korea could exist. And we asked for nothing in return. No country's ever done anything close to that. We sent a milk reading history. What did I. How is that not true what I just said? No, but what am I saying that's untrue? Americans gave away $500 billion to charity last year voluntarily. We've taken half of the world's immigrants. Half.

[Abortion Questioner]

You know how those trusts work. Do you know that only 5% of the money that you put into a

[Immigration Questioner]

nonprofit or a charity even has to be used.

[Charlie Kirk]

So money. So most charities and most foundations will use 90 plus percent of the net assets they get every single year. Now, you can look at the ir. You can look at the IRS website. I understand what I'm saying might bother you, but we're also the most accepting, least racist, most diverse multiracial country in the world by far We've been in. Okay, How? Look at the United States. We take in half the world's immigrants every single year. So. Most America is not living in poverty. Yes.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Really?

[Charlie Kirk]

We're the richest country in the world by far. We have an American middle class. It's a uniquely American concept.

[Abortion Questioner]

You ever walk down the street and seen all the homeless people?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Excuse me, I grew up in a gang. Gang infested neighborhood.

[Charlie Kirk]

So you want to talk to poor people?

[Immigration Questioner]

I'm just talking.

[Abortion Questioner]

And we're talking to you from a

[Charlie Kirk]

perspective of people that have experiences. You know that America's poor are actually in the richest 1% in the world. A remarkable amount of people in the world.

[Abortion Questioner]

How's the richest 1%?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, what I'm saying is that a very poor person in America is relatively extraordinarily rich by world standards. Yes. Hello. How are you? I go around universities and have challenging conversations because that's what is so important to our country, is to find our disagreements respectfully. Because when people stop talking, that's when violence happens. You could see that happen all across the world. So I don't. And I'm not really interested in being filmed. So that's. I understand.

[Widow of Charlie Kirk's Husband]

I'm in America and that's to do

[Charlie Kirk]

that, but I prefer. Where you from?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Australia.

[Charlie Kirk]

Oh, great. Okay. And I just. I just want to get an understanding of how to do that. So I've been in Tennessee, different universities. I've never seen someone do this. Yes, well, it's a growing trend because people like me are facing violence, assault, the left.

[Young Woman Questioner]

The left?

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes, the campus antifa. I've been stormed out of restaurants. I've been assaulted publicly, multiple death threats. What do you think's happened? Well, the campus left has been incited by Democratic leadership and trained to go after people like me. Okay, so that part of this aside, what motivates you to come out here? Well, because I love talking to people I disagree with. In America, we have a tradition for public discourse and dialogue. Going back to the Lincoln Douglas debates, going back to. To Teddy Roosevelt screaming at political opponents, going back to how the US Congress should exist. Okay, so what's your goal in all this? I'm freezing. We're in the shade. I'm freezing. No, this is where we have to be. My goal is to. Why do you have to be here? Well, because you have to have permits and stuff to do this. Yeah. This is a. Despite the first amendment, they relegate you to a certain area. But also number too. There's more people that agree with me than some people would actually believe. And they come out of the woodwork when I do stuff like this. And finally we record all of it so that we put on the Internet so people can see these ideas collide. When people stop talking, that's when you get violence. That's when civil war happens because you start to think the other side is so evil and they lose their humanity. Marriages break apart when you stop talking. Churches fall apart. Businesses, companies, friendships, relationships. Yeah, one thing. Sure.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Cuz I have to go meet some

[Charlie Kirk]

people from the university here. There's just one thing that I've seen as you've been sitting here shivering in

[Abortion Questioner]

the cold, is that you really. You probably have some really good points

[Young Woman Questioner]

to say and that's fine. And I'm trying to listen, understand as

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm here, I'm going to go home on Saturday and I'm away from all of this. But you really quickly slip into a grocery. Into what?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Into a grocery.

[Charlie Kirk]

I don't know what that word means. Rhetoric. Oh, rhetoric. I didn't hear it. Right. Okay.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Hell yeah.

[Abortion Questioner]

That makes you, you kind of start

[Charlie Kirk]

to tip off things and tick the points that you're trying to make. And I'm sure you know your arguments really well, but from the people I

[Young Woman Questioner]

watch standing here, they're kind of, they're

[Charlie Kirk]

kind of interfacing towards us. Do you think they hear that stuff commonly though? Well, I don't know. I think you become quite lecturing to people and it's not a criticism. You have your style, you're comfortable with it.

[Young Woman Questioner]

But if it's a conversation that you

[Charlie Kirk]

want, I think your approach might be. Yeah, but at least 10 or 2012 things I told that I said that were factual.

[Abortion Questioner]

That's your point that you told.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes. Telling is not a conversation. But they have. They can walk away at any time. Conversation takes two people. Yes, but they didn't hear it. Some of. For example, I said 90 plus percent of Border Patrol agents support building the wall. They immediately dismiss it. They never heard that before. So I'm saying things that are not commonly discussed in a university. And all I'M saying is if this way you say it sometimes. Okay, I appreciate that. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. Thank you.

[Faith-Based Conservative Questioner]

I'm technically a Democrat, but I have very conservative views because I'm faith based all the way. So I have a question which is also kind of a disagreement, but I want to build it up. Okay, so of course you just said Jesus is the most important thing for everyone out here. And so can you please explain to everyone out here what Jesus did, stood for, and especially the qualities of love, how to love your neighbor, even if they don't agree with you.

[Charlie Kirk]

So what, what is your name again?

[Immigration Questioner]

Talis.

[Charlie Kirk]

That's a beautiful question. I'm glad you came up to ask it. But I want to also just add something because you're right. Jesus fully embodied two things simultaneously that showed his divine and his godly nature. Because not that Jesus said good things, Jesus is Lord, Christ is king, and Jesus is God, on top of just being a guy with a lot of good ideas. So John 8, if I'm drawing from memory correctly, best embodies both Christ's mercy and love, but also his commitment to truth. And sometimes in the modern gospel, we overemphasize the grace and we under emphasize the truth. And so we are far too willing to say, hey, Jesus loves everybody. But we don't get to the second part of the conversation that says, Jesus doesn't want you to live in sin. So this is in John 8. It's best embodied, right? Almost every Christian in this audience will be able to tell you the first part of this, which is a bunch of Sadducees and Pharisees are sitting around, standing around with rocks and they're about to stone the prostitute woman. And Jesus comes up and says, let the first among you without sin cast the first stone. And everyone starts dropping the rocks. But what comes next shows that Christ is not just grace focused, he's simultaneously truth focused. He goes up to the woman who had a career in selling herself for sex and said, sin no more. Now imagine today how much trouble you would get in if you would go up to somebody and say, stop sinning, that, oh, you're being too judgmental. No, no, you're actually being Christ. Like so Jesus stood. He was 100% grace and truth. And that tension is very hard in a modern world because we want to overemphasize grace, when in reality Christ loves us too much to have us continue to live in sin. He wants us to try to elevate our actions to glorify God in all that we do.

[Faith-Based Conservative Questioner]

I agree 100%. And so to build on my question, I really want to talk about DEI and so with our Christian. I will agree with you a lot of. I read the Bible for myself, so I knew what that scripture said. But my question is, how can Christian teachings on love, equity and justice inform and shape discussions on diversity, equity and inclusion in today's society? And so to also, Jesus hung out with sinners. He did not judge. He told the truth. And so I think that a lot of people in society today, when we talk about political views that are opposition, we judge them because we think, oh, because you voted for Trump, you, you agree on everything when that's not the case.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Right.

[Faith-Based Conservative Questioner]

And. And I want you to talk about that.

[Charlie Kirk]

So, so, and then I'll connect at the DEI and I'm going to make a case. I don't know if it'll be persuasive to you. Why I think DEI is unbiblical and I'm going to try to make that case. Okay, but first let me talk about comment on your astute point, which is that Christ wants us to be around people that are not like us. This is why I go to college campuses. But more and more I go to college campuses, I'm getting a lot of big crowds, so it's kind of unusual. I used to go here and, you know, get heckled and have very small crowds. But let me demonstrate this in an unusual way. Almost every person in this audience would say Christ wants us to be salt and light. Now, what are the two characteristics of salt and light? They change the environments that they come in contact with. They do not affirm, they do not conform. They change for the better. It's very important, everybody, we as Christians are called to change the environment that we come in touch with.

[Matt - Christian Conservative Questioner]

How's it going? So I'm a born again believer in Jesus and. But I want to hear your thoughts, Charlie, because sometimes I really struggle to align myself with the conservative side of the issues in our country and multiple experiences in my life, whether it be it was just conversation that somebody picked up or whatever, how I look, whatever it may be, assumptions my political views or where I'm leaning have blocked and gotten in front of what I really believe in, which is advancing the gospel. And so my issue sometimes is that I want to be patriotic. I want to, you know, vote for and be public about that which I think is best for my country. But I don't want it to get in front of my main goal. What I feel like I've been placed here on this earth for which is advancing the gospel to all people, not just conservatives, not just people who are comfortable walking in the church, but the far left of the left who are in their season of life for reasons I don't know and I don't want to what I believe to be best for this country to get in the way of what's going to ultimately grow the kingdom of God.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's a great question. What's your name?

[Matt - Christian Conservative Questioner]

Matt.

[Charlie Kirk]

Matt, thank you. Let's repeat what you said because it's correct. The most important thing in the world is to know Christ and make him known. The second most important thing, though, is to make sure you can do the first thing. That's where I come in. You're focusing your life to number one. I'm focusing a majority of my life on number two. What do I mean by that? During COVID they called the church non essential, yet they left strip clubs, open marijuana dispensaries, Home Depot and Lowe's. But they said the bride of Christ was non essential. They always say separation of church and state. Why is it then that the state could come in and shut down the church? You see, what we see is that when we stop caring about politics, is the government so big it starts persecuting our religious liberty and our freedom? And it's not a contradiction. In fact, if you look at the conservative agenda, it is. It is far. It's a far greater fit with a biblical worldview than anything on the left. And I'm sure you agree with that, right? God created man and woman. When does life begin? Strong borders. It says in the Scriptures, Jeremiah 29:7. Demand the welfare of the nation that you are in, because your welfare is tied to your nation's welfare. So we should care about our nation. In fact, Daniel fasted and prayed for his country. Esther, Mordecai, Nehemiah, Jeremiah, Joseph. In fact, we are called to be counselors to the king. We're called to be the moral conscious of a nation. And so if we want to know Christ and make him known, we must have one ingredient. A free society. It is hard to know Christ and make him known in countries where the gospel is not allowed to be told on the side of the street, like China or North Korea. And that's not an exaggeration. When Christians fail to care about politics, politics will start caring about Christians. And we must understand that we are the recipients and the inheritors of a country that was founded by Christians so the gospel can spread. And so I don't think it's a contradiction at all. I don't think that it's what's best for the country. I think is actually best for the kingdom. And let's pretend America falls. Let's say America collapses. Do you know that well over 90% of all international mission funding comes from the United States? Yeah, I can believe it that most missionaries come from 5% of the world's population. Here we are populating the earth in Africa and South America with people who love the Lord, that come with money, that come with resources, that come with, you know, clean water equipment. If America were to fall, the gospel would not spread as far. In fact, the world is becoming more Christian because of America's wealth, our generosity, and our track record to say that we're going to stand for our fellow man and love our neighbor as ourselves. So I don't see any contradiction. I just see a difference in the same mission. Your mission is first and foremost to win people of Christ. I try to do that every day. But my mission is to make sure that you can do that without being arrested or thrown in a gulag.

[Matt - Christian Conservative Questioner]

Thank you.

[Charlie Kirk]

God bless you. And I just wanted to ask you, because I'm a big Catholic, I wanted to ask you how important do you think religion is in this, in this day and age? Very important.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

I mean, as America becomes more secular and as the country becomes less godly, we become less free, more miserable, more depressed, more suicidal, more anxious. Yeah. So is this. So I see that you. That you really do try to push religion. Are you. You're a Christian? Yeah, I am a Christian. Did you grow up that way? Yes. Or did you just recently kind of. No. I mean, I grew up in a passive Christian home. Gave my life to the Lord when I was in fifth grade.

[Atheist Debater]

Yeah.

[Abortion Questioner]

Hi.

[Young Woman Questioner]

I'm wondering what your intentions are. Sorry, I'm new to you in this and I was just intrigued.

[Charlie Kirk]

Hear from different ideas and see where we agree and disagree. So.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah. What's like, your purpose, though? Like, communication. Yes. But like, what are. What ideas are you trying to bring or like, help people understand?

[Charlie Kirk]

Conservative ones, Traditional American ones.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Okay. Like traditional conservatism or like modern conservative right wing because they, like, switched.

[Charlie Kirk]

I don't like labels. So you can ask me about a topic. Yeah.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

I think there's only two sexes, no genders, infinite personalities. Life begins at conception. We should deport all the illegals. Right. The MRNA gene altering shot called the vaccine killed a lot of people and is currently poisoning a lot of people.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

So these are just some of my Opinions.

[Young Woman Questioner]

So you think it'll like, make the country better? Like, what are you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, I mean, I hope that number. Number one, I want to support our amazing Turning Point USA chapter here where they feel outnumbered and isolated. Number two, we're promoting our event tonight, so I hope you guys show up. Where's our event? It's like in the Montezuma hall or something. Yeah, it's great. Montezuma Hall. Montezuma. Whatever. And number three is I want to see where I might be wrong, strengthen my arguments, and anybody can say anything to me. I think that free speech is the last best hope we have in Western society.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Nice. Okay, then I have a question about, like, women's rights in America. I just want to hear what you think, like, where you think we're at, how you think we could better them.

[Charlie Kirk]

Just so I know where you're coming from, can you tell me what is a woman?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Oh, that's a great question. I would classify a woman as somebody with a womb and. Or a vagina. Sometimes people are born with either one or the other.

[Charlie Kirk]

Good. We agree. Yes. So as far as women's rights, I don't separate rights based on sex. So you have to tell me what you mean based on that.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Okay. Oh, that's interesting. So do you believe that there's a difference right now in like people's rights and.

[Charlie Kirk]

No. No. I mean, there's male female differences, but there are no male rights or women. Can you give me an example?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Okay. Like patriarchy. That's what I'm getting at. Do you believe that we live in a patriarchy and it negatively affects women?

[Charlie Kirk]

No.

[Young Woman Questioner]

No.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah. So, for example, men are more likely to commit suicide.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

More likely to die at work. More likely to declare bankruptcy. Women are far less likely to be in credit card debt. Far more likely to graduate from college, Far more likely to get a high paying job.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Do you think that the. That's a really good point. Do you think that the suicide rates or the depression rates and the bankruptcy rates that you just mentioned regarding men have to do with the fact that men are pushed to be less open about their emotions? They're less available to being able to communicate how they feel with others. They're taught to be more violent and be more physically harmful to themselves and others. And do you think that pushes them towards suicide, depression and bankruptcy?

[Charlie Kirk]

I think it's the opposite. I think that we're teaching men to be metrosexual versions of their former selves.

[Young Woman Questioner]

What does metrosexual mean to you?

[Charlie Kirk]

Indecipherable between a man and woman.

[Young Woman Questioner]

So what's a man and woman to you? What's the difference between them?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, a man is in. You're looking at a man and I think I'm looking at a woman, if I'm not mistaken.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Nice. Yeah, that was funny.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, there's. Yeah, thank you. There's characteristics, archetypes, but we have differences. There are significant male female differences, I think.

[Atheist Debater]

Like what?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, men tend to be more assertive, women tend to be more agreeable innately or taught innately. And I wouldn't say innately.

[Abortion Questioner]

Based on what?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Science?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, just for example, if we look at artificial intelligence, scanned over 10,000 brains using a SPECT scan.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

And was able to determine male female differences 95% of the time of different brain functions based on basal ganglia, amygdala. Do you know the age cerebellum?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Because Interestingly enough, ages 14 to 22. Okay, 14 to 22. I read a study recently that before the age of 10, brains are neuroscientists are unable to be able to tell the difference in gender based on the.

[Immigration Questioner]

The brain.

[Young Woman Questioner]

But at a certain point the social implications that children are taught start making them act differently. But it's been shown that if a man or a woman were given the same. Okay. Have you heard that men are. They have more spatial awareness like in their brain?

[Charlie Kirk]

I think that's probably true. Yeah.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah. So we learned that if women are given a month of the same practices as children that men are given or allowed to do, whether, whether it comes to what they're playing, the media, they're in taking like what they're told and how they're told to act, that women have the same spatial awareness ability as men. So we're finding that innately the brain is the same. But because of the social constructs that we're taught on men and women and how they're supposed to act, their brain ability to activate certain parts changes. So by 14, the brain does seem different.

[Charlie Kirk]

You ever raise kids? Tell me, have you ever raised kids?

[Young Woman Questioner]

No. I have six nieces and nephews though.

[Charlie Kirk]

Men and women, you couldn't be more wrong. If you're even around a two year old boy and two year old girl. It's not a matter of what they're taught. The girls are running to the dresses, the boys are running to the guns. You know who agrees with me? One of the leading feminists of the 60s and 70s, Gloria Steinman, who wrote Feminist Mystique.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

I've read that even she who was like a Hardcore gender is taught. When she raised her kids, she was like, oh my goodness. There is a fundamental innate difference between men and women. And it's not just brain structure. It's testosterone, it's estradiol, it's estrogen production, it is hormone levels, it is all. And I could just prove it. If you sit down with a young lady, they're far more likely to talk about microtopics and men are more likely to talk about macro topics.

[Young Woman Questioner]

What's the difference between micro and microopics?

[Charlie Kirk]

Great question. So if I sat down with a young lady, she'd be much more likely to talk about friends, relationships and things that are very intimate. A young man would be more likely to talk about the weather, sports, or the stock market or politics. And that's not taught. That is innate. That is innate into our bio programming.

[Young Woman Questioner]

What is bio programming?

[Charlie Kirk]

How we were designed.

[Young Woman Questioner]

What do you mean how we were designed?

[Charlie Kirk]

I mean, I believe that there's a creator that designed us and that we're fearfully and wonderfully made. And you might not agree. I would just say how you were born. I could even say, just to come to common ground on that.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Okay, so the creator chose that men and women, women have separate roles and it's innate.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, not just separate roles, but made differently. And out of being made differently, you get different roles.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Right. So if science proves that the other way. Do you rely on creator over science?

[Charlie Kirk]

But science has done the opposite. So for example, in a Harvard study, they put 50 women in a room alone. And they put 50 men in the room alone.

[Young Woman Questioner]

What age?

[Charlie Kirk]

Not relevant. But around 25. Right?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Relevant. No, sorry, I'm actually having so much.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, sorry, keep going. So if you really. I'm fascinated that you think that 8 year olds brains are infinitely neuroplastic, but we'll get to that. Back to that.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Oh no. When they're like babies, by 8 years old, you're already going through school and you've had so many relationships, they're definitely affected.

[Charlie Kirk]

But again, if you were right, John, money would have been proven right. But we'll get to that later. So which that test has been replicated so many times and even the Dutch, who are like the most progressive on this, have gotten away from the idea of tabula rasa, that boys and girls are born similarly with brain differences. But we'll agree to discern that. But anyway, 25 year olds were put into a room, okay. And they said, men, what do you think about when they're alone? No surprise. Sports and sex, right? Young ladies, what do you think about in the room alone for 30 minutes just by themselves? They replayed prior conversations that they had. For the record, no man in the history of the species has replayed conversations that we had and thought about them when we were alone in a room. What conversation was. What was this person said? Women are far more relational micro than men. And that's just based on how our design is.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Whoa. I think that you just lied that all men don't think that's such a.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's called a joke. I'm sure there's a man somewhere that recollected on a conversation.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Well, I didn't know that. In a dialect. That's a debate based on science. And you're talking about a study that. Would you implement a joke that. That's based on a genius.

[Abortion Questioner]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Humor is a tool of a rhetorician to try to get people, you know, to chuckle. A little levity. So, yeah. Thank you. I appreciate it. Thank you. Let me ask you a question. Do you think testosterone and estrogen play into people's ability to have drive, ambition, feelings? And do you think testosterone and estrogen are important?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, so then if women are lower in testosterone and higher in estrogen, and men are lower in estrogen, higher in testosterone, wouldn't that, independent of society's framing, play into the idea that there are natural differences between the two?

[Young Woman Questioner]

I think that it definitely plays into the idea that there are natural differences. And I think there are natural differences. I just think to an extent that as a society, we've decided that men, because they have more testosterone and we've known testosterone makes people more aggravated. That or what's aggravated? I'll just leave it aggressive. Aggressive, yes, sure.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'll take aggressive.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah. Thank you. That it makes people or men more aggressive. That we've decided that that means that men are not in control of their moral ability or their ability to choose what they're going to do. So it becomes like men have more testosterone, but they still have the ability to choose to treat people better or with less aggression. Like, it's not. It's like, oh, men don't have the ability to make those choices. That's almost like downplaying men's ability by saying that they just have to give in to their aggression.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm not contesting that. The mark of a true man is one who control, who can control himself. Do you think that you could. Do you think there's a problem of trying to turn women too masculine?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Turning women too masculine? What's masculine for you?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, just Say, not agreeable, forceful, aggressive. Aggressive in the best possible term. Forward thinking, more macro, more visionary, less feeling based, more rational, more. More yearning towards reason and dialogue and less towards compassion or the ethos.

[Young Woman Questioner]

And what's feminine to you?

[Charlie Kirk]

The inverse of that. So more on the emotion side. Less macro, more micro much.

[Young Woman Questioner]

So women are just what men are not?

[Charlie Kirk]

No, they're different sides of a species coin. Right. So you have a human species, you have a male and female, and there's differences. So I could also posit it separately. A woman is more compassionate, a man is less compassionate. So there's two ways to word it. But do you think that there's a problem about trying to force women to be too masculine?

[Young Woman Questioner]

No, I don't think there's a problem.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, well, I disagree. We have, we have a crisis in this country. We. Why do you, I'm curious, why do you think that we have so many unmarried young 30something women? It's the most in the history of recorded data.

[Young Woman Questioner]

That's a good question. I don't know if I've ever pondered why we have unmarried women.

[Charlie Kirk]

Why do you think that it's the young women are the most depressed, alcohol addicted and psychiatric drug addicted in history.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Is that true?

[Charlie Kirk]

Oh, yeah. The most miserable they've ever been. I'm just curious, why do you think that is?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah, I guess I would, I would say that I think it's because like the society that we live in, right? Like capitalistic, consumeristic, where there's like constant processing and over consumption that includes like drugs, alcohol, like the over consumption.

[Charlie Kirk]

So women going into the workforce a lot could create a lot of depression for them.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah, same with men.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, but then shouldn't women like, I don't know, stay at home and have children and do what they're designed to do?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Men are also.

[Charlie Kirk]

Wouldn't that make them happier?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Have the most depression that they have right now? You can make the same argument from what you just made for women.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm asking questions. Maybe the men are upset because the women that they're trying to date are more interested in taking care of cats and trying to become partner at the local law firm. And they say, I don't want to get married till I'm 30. And maybe that creates a sense of despondency when a young male being raised in this country sees everything rigged against them.

[Young Woman Questioner]

So do you not believe that women should be working?

[Charlie Kirk]

Of course. I think I believe in liberty. I'm just asking, has there been an unintended tragedy where we have the most financially successful 30 to 35 year old cohort of young women in history.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Well, again, the women like men and women are the most sick and depressed.

[Charlie Kirk]

The women are far more depressed than the men. The men are depressed.

[Young Woman Questioner]

But you just said that the men were more depressed and that's why they're suicidal.

[Charlie Kirk]

They're more suicidal and they're largely more suicidal.

[Young Woman Questioner]

So they're more suicidal, but. But they're less depressed.

[Charlie Kirk]

They're more successful at committing suicide than women.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Oh, that's a big difference.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, yeah, women commit suicide. Women. No, it's true. Women try to commit suicide more. And yet women will go through three or four attempted suicide attempts. Men usually only one. You can look it up, it's just the way it is. But I'm just curious, what, what is it about the 30 to 35 year old female? Do you think there might be something missing? Do you think that there's like this biological urge to get married and procreate? That we might have been sitting oppressing because it is the least child, it's the childless, least married cohort in the history of the country?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah, I believe that marriage and reproduction are beautiful things. I do.

[Charlie Kirk]

Do you think we should encourage it more for young women?

[Young Woman Questioner]

I think we could encourage like a deeper understanding of people's individual sense of self. And then through that, if people can better understand their wants and needs and become more self aware about who they are and what they need, that ultimately they would lead them to like better and more efficient decision making for themselves. Okay, Whether or not that means marriage.

[Charlie Kirk]

Last question. You posited this. How would you define the patriarchy?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Oh, the patriarchy. So patriarchy, like the epistemology of the

[Charlie Kirk]

word or just like if. Do you believe it exists in the country today?

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah, I believe patriarchy existed. Patriarchy comes from pater.

[Abortion Questioner]

Right.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Pater means father in Latin. So patriarchy is father over or men over. So it's like a men ruling. Right. So we see it in the fact that God or the divinity is represented as men, which only happened like halfway through the history of humans. So it was like a matrilineal matriarchy society for a while. We see it in the fact that women take men's last name. We see it in the way that, in the way that men are viewed or like men view women and how women kind of have to adhere to the way that men want them to be portrayed. And I agree with you that porn is, what'd you say?

[Charlie Kirk]

Toxic.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Toxic, yeah. And I think that's an aspect of the Patriarchy. Right. Like if you go on a porn website, which I'm sure you haven't in a while.

[Charlie Kirk]

Not in a while. I used to be addicted, though.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah.

[Abortion Questioner]

Whoa, Kudos.

[Charlie Kirk]

And I encourage everyone to break free of that addiction.

[Atheist Questioner]

It's terrible.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah, me too. Yeah, me too. That's great. Proud of you for that one. Yeah. But if you go on a porn website, you can see that like the view of all of the porn is from the perspective of a man and it's of a woman. And these kinds of aspects show that right now we live in a society where it's a man's view, it's men over. So like we're all taking on.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, I thank you for that. First, on the porn thing, 85% of people that consume porn are men. So they're obviously going to shoot it in a way that is more attuned to men. For example, what if women.

[Young Woman Questioner]

What if it was shooted for women

[Charlie Kirk]

and then they would, they would change the perspective because they're, they're in it to make money. The same reason why Lifetime movies don't have rock and roll music. And they tend to be very like uplifting, fl. Flowery, emotional based and hyper feminine in the writing because most people that watch Lifetime movies are women.

[Young Woman Questioner]

What's Lifetime movie?

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay. A Lifetime movie is like a feel good movie on cable TV that has like a very poorly written narrative and usually ends in some sort of overly.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Like Hallmark.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, like Hallmark. Yeah. Yeah. That's the best way I could. I could put it. Got it. But thank you for the dialogue. I appreciate it.

[Young Woman Questioner]

Yeah, thanks. Thanks, you too.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you.

[Abortion Questioner]

Good luck.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thanks.

[Skeptical Observer]

Sorry, just to clarify, I'm not a very big fan. I'm aware of Turning Point usa, but I don't watch a lot of stuff. I don't really have like a theological or political question. I have more of a question about like dialogue and like the purpose of kind of these meetings. Because looking into Turning Point usa, it's really just an organization that's meant to like spread awareness of like your political beliefs being like pro Christian, pro Republican Party, or more Trump, I guess. But my question is, do you think that this platform or like this discussion of like politics in this way is useful? Because like, for example, the guy that you talked to a little bit ago about vaccines, you had a lot of stuff to say to him that he couldn't really counteract in that moment. Because just coming from it, you are a professional, that this is your job. You walk around doing this and so you just have more facts readily available that aren't necessarily verifiable. So it's kind of hard to argue a point whether it's right or wrong and whether or not you have the, the equipment to do so. If you just automatically have points that we can't really verify.

[Charlie Kirk]

You guys are welcome to bring phones or notes or phone a friend. Well, yeah, but that you could bring a professor too.

[Skeptical Observer]

That's a good point.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, go bring a professor, bring two. Bring the whole Al debate a movie. No, go find a professor, bring them down and let's debate whatever you want.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Okay.

[Charlie Kirk]

I mean like, yes, to answer your question, you're coming this in a good way. I do think this is effective. Look at the crowd you've already assembled. And I think that free speech is a bedrock of American society. And to be able to pursue truth and find out we agree or disagree or have my assumptions challenged. And I do this all from memory. I don't have any notes here. You guys are welcome. You're not professionals, you're able to bring whatever you want. But yeah, look, I think that on this campus especially, it is a predominantly homogenous left wing campus, especially amongst the professors. And to have a conservative be able to sit here and take adversarial questions, I think it also gives confidence to other conservatives here on campus to speak up when they might hear something they disagree about or give them conviction to maybe say, hey, I don't agree with that. And so I think that has a lot of value.

[Skeptical Observer]

Okay, just one more question on the meeting itself because I understand the point of like kind of validating conservatives ability to talk. Obviously we don't want to just kind of shut them up. That's not a very good course for dialogue. Yeah, but I think at the same time it's also. These are all posted on the Internet, right?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, they're posted in its entirety. Yes, correct. As long as unless somebody says, you know, yeah, something that you insane.

[Skeptical Observer]

But you usually. Again, as someone who doesn't watch Turning Point usa, the only thing I see from talks like this and similar to like, I don't know if you associate with like Steven Crowder or. But he has very similar, like come and talk, talk about these things. The only thing I ever really see from that is more sensationalized conversations like shutting down. And sometimes I feel like this dialogue can become.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, I mean again, you could look at my YouTube channel. We post hour long clips of these deals. So you see the clips because they lead to the longer form. But both are posted for sure.

[Skeptical Observer]

Do you think it's because it leads to the longer form or it's, it's easier to watch and more entertaining?

[Charlie Kirk]

I mean, look, you're competing for eyeballs against literal pornography, Hulu, Netflix and sports. So when people are, want to engage with content around politics, you're trying to win people over. Right. But also we want to have integrity for the conversations that we have, which is what we do with our, a lot of our YouTube videos and our longer form content. So. Okay, thank you very much. Appreciate it. Keep watching, man. Thank you. Oh, are you a Satanist?

[Skeptical Observer]

No.

[Charlie Kirk]

I know, I know Satan's not real.

[Affirmative Action Questioner]

Not that.

[Charlie Kirk]

Oh, okay, yeah, no, Satan is very real. But yeah, you can put the mic up. Satan is very, very. It does relate to.

[Skeptical Observer]

I wanted to ask, I wanted to ask like.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, first, are you a Christian? Very, very much so. And I want to ask like, like why is that exactly? Jesus saved my life. I'm a sinner, fall short of the glory of God, gave my life to Christ. Most important to see decision I ever made. So you believe the Bible is real? Yes, I believe the Bible is true and real. Why is that? Well, I could give you the technical answer. There's never been an archaeological discovery that has contradicted the truth of the Bible. We know everything. The Bible, as far as the kings, as far as the succession of Israeli rulers, to the Jewish people being put in exile, being put back into the land of Jerusalem, to the destruction of the temple in AD 70, all that checks out. There's never been a discovery that's contradicted it. From King Ahazek to King Cyrus to Nehemiah to Zerubbabel, to this destruction of the creation of the second temple. And then of course, the wisdom. There is not a truth of the Bible that if you apply to your life, your life does not improve dramatically. And then finally, we have the most accurate and transparent, the most historically robust account, I should say, that one can have, of the most important figure ever to live in the history of the world, Jesus of Nazareth. And Jesus of Nazareth, who was born of virgin birth, what we believe is the incarnation, performed miracles all throughout Judea and Samaria, eventually confronted Pharisees, led to a death that he did not deserve, was in the grave for three days, and then rose from the dead. And the resurrection is the pinpoint of my belief that Jesus did rise from the grave so that we may live. So what about the stories of Greek and Roman mythology? Do you think any of that is real? No. So then what makes Christian mythology real? Well, Give me an example of Christian mythology that I can do. Like creation. So like Genesis, like story of like David and Goliath for example. Well that one's actually pretty easy to deconstruct. A sling is actually a rather lethal weapon, especially for someone in a Judean tribe that's trained to use a sling of a young age. And Goliath was a rather clumsy individual. And if you're able to pinpoint a rock right between the temple lobe, you can effectively kill or lobotomize that individual. So that's hardly mythology. Alright, so what about, what about the story of Satan's fall then? What about that is real in Ezekiel? Yeah, so that's not mythology, but that is theology. So in, in the story of Satan's fall, in the later books of Ezekiel, we are told that God created the heavens and the earth. God created the angels. And there was a rebellious angel, Lucifer, who led a rebellion against God and brought one third of the angels with him and then created what is now as the underworld. As the best Hebraic interpretation of that which we now know as Hell. I could go through every single story. Jonah and the whale, parting of the Red Sea, right? Ahab on Mount Carmel with Elijah. Here's my answer. If Genesis 1:1 and the resurrection is true, anything in the Bible is possible. You're looking at the greatest miracle. The greatest miracle is creation. The fact that we have an ordered, intelligible world where we can exist and that human, human beings are able to flourish. That is a miracle. In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth in Hebrew that is Bereshit in the beginning. And then the fact that Jesus rose from the dead. I say how do you know that Jesus rose from the dead? Well, show me another historical piece of a story where so many people willingly died a brutal death for a lie. Every single person around him had everything to lose and yet they went to the absolute death. From Paul to Peter to the half brother of James, saying that Jesus is Lord, Jesus rose from the dead. Not to mention, if you were going to fake a story, you would not use female witnesses in the ancient world. In the scriptures it said that the women were the first one to see Jesus Christ. If you're trying to fake a story, you would never do that. Not to mention the 500 people that saw Jesus after he rose from the dead, doubting Thomas and then the later church that lived under persecution under the belief that Jesus Christ was the son of God. One last question. Do you think Christianity should be to forced? No, no, I don't believe Christianity should be forced, then it's not love, it's rape. So we believe that God loves you so he will not force you. And so if you reject God, you will go to hell. I hope that's not the case for you guys because you can give Jesus Christ, you can live life eternal, but it's a love story, not a fourth story. And so it's this option. In front of you, will you surrender in front of the cross? The cross is this idea that the perfect, the divine, came down and took a human form and died the most brutal death the ancient world knew. The most torturous, brutal death that someone could possibly know and then rose from the dead to defeat death so you could live forever. And so it's a gift there right in front of you. If you take that gift, it transforms you from within, changes your life. You have joy and happiness that you otherwise would not have. But you have a conscious choice to reject that, and I hope you don't. And if you reject that, then you will go where you want to go, which is in absence, the furthest distance one can be from the divine. I go to college campuses and there's a lot of error. We're all sinners, we all live in error. We as Christians are called to go into the public arena to correct error with truth. What is God's plan? When I go on a college campus, I just believe I will only tell truth. I will not compromise and I'll love on the lost purpose will give you happiness. You see, we live in a country where they think that happiness is pleasure. We know that purpose is a blessing above all of this serving God, that we are made in his image, that there is a struggle of good versus evil. Every day you get to fight for what is good and what is true and beautiful. God should be the most important thing in your life. Jesus Christ is your Lord and savior most important thing. But then beyond that, it's getting married, having children, building families, leaving a legacy, doing big and great things, Taking the deep. But sometimes the difficult road is the way that you should configure your life. Getting married and having children is a difficult but deep decision that I hope every single one of you make. Because for every single one of you there are a couple thousand students that wish they could speak out like you do. And courage is a choice we are no longer going to accept comfortable losing. We are no longer going to accept excuses from all elected officials. We have more combined political power than they have ever allowed us to believe. We are the party of people that shower before work and shower after work. The people that get their hands dirty. The people that protect our streets. The people that have built this country. What can I do to save the country? You answer that question every single day. You are doing the work to save of this beautiful republic. You are doing something that is bigger than you. America is the greatest country ever to exist. Period. Bar none is the greatest country ever to exist, right? For more on many of these stories and news you can Trust, go to charliekirk.com.