D (4:21)

I just like that. It's like, you know, pause in the action of the game. What game? You know, just you might happen to be involved in some sort of.

C (4:27)

Some sort of sporting event. We're not sure, you know, and there's no specific one.

D (4:30)

There's nothing by name.

C (4:32)

There's. There's no names.

D (4:34)

Some people watch no names. Some people watch pro Starcraft matches on Sundays. I'm sure.

C (4:38)

Yeah, I just pause. I just. I just love it. I think it's one of the most fun things. And I was. I was texting in our group chat with Jack this morning.

D (4:45)

No, this is weird. No, I'm revealing this one. What was great was it finally occurred to Andrew, wait a minute. We're doing this because Charlie didn't like halftime shows.

C (4:54)

That's not. I mean.

D (4:56)

And he never realized that before.

C (4:57)

Listen, I have a great story. When Charlie did the sexual anarchy tweet. I don't know if we have that. So it was during. It was a couple years back. They were doing the rappers from the 90s. You know, it was like. Who was it? It was Ice Cube. Was it Ice Cube? No, it wasn't Ice Cube. Anyways, it was like Snoop Dogg and Dr. Dre.

D (5:19)

That's February 2022.

C (5:21)

And it was actually kind of a tame performance.

D (5:25)

NFL is now the league of sexual anarchy.

C (5:27)

Yes.

D (5:28)

This halftime show should not be allowed on television.

C (5:31)

Well, and I remember because basically I took one breather from. From like monitoring my phone to go get some barbecue because I was at a Super bowl party, obviously. And then unbeknownst to me, in the five minutes I stepped away, Charlie fired off that all timer of a tweet. And I was just like, charlie, that was the most tame halftime show that they've had in about a decade. But I think. And was he, by the way, did.

D (6:01)

He actually see it or did he.

C (6:02)

Just assume he was watching it? He was watching it. And I mean, he was taking screen grabs to prove his point. And I was like, okay, Charlie, all right. But anyways, the point is that Charlie always had a hot take on the halftime show. And, you know, I was sort of more in the head space of like, you know, people don't like the current offering. They don't like it. There's a demand in the marketplace. I didn't create the demand. The other guys created the demand by choosing their anti English speaking, anti ice queer celebrating person as the performer. So I didn't create the demand. We didn't create the demand. That's more where my head was at. But it turns out there's just a lot of demand. And yeah, obviously Secretary of War Pete Hegseth getting in the mix. We had a bunch of different people from government agencies say, hey, how can we help? What can we do? We want to be a part of this. And a bunch of the streaming platforms reached out. It's been phenomenal. So the reaction has been great.

D (6:59)

It's pretty fun because we're actually reviving an old tradition how the other things halftime show got started in the first place. It started, they used to have more tame ones and they thought it's the super bowl. Nobody's gonna mess with it. And then other channels started to counter program it deliberately. And so for example, in Living Color was that sketch comedy show that would went on when you were growing up. And they just did like a big episode during the halftime show window on a different channel to try to steal viewers during it. And that's when they went over the top and said, oh, we're gonna, they got Michael Jackson the next year, but now they had good acts for a long time and now they've sort of come full circle back to bad acts that a ton of people don't want to watch.

C (7:42)

Yeah, I listen, I, I, that makes sense. They've. But they've gone woke. Jay Z's running the show over there and yeah, that's, listen, you get, you get your just desserts.

D (7:51)

That's how we got here. This is a weird artifact of Floida Palooza around that time. And everyone said the halftime show is racist. It needs to be more culturally aware. And they just gave Jay Z total creative control over it. And so he's used it to book left wing, anti American kind of out, out of the mainstream acts. I would say that stuff that does not appeal to the broad base of, of fans.

C (8:15)

We have a, we have a throwback, throwback Charlie clip when he's wearing a hat. It was at the old studio. This is from February 2022. Let's just play it. 343.

A (8:24)

Look, the super bowl halftime show has a reputation. People say it's a spicy program. Okay, listen, spicy. It's supposed to be boundary pushing when you have the most televised event. This is true. Most televised event for the entire year. One of the most televised events on the planet, by the way. That should be a reflection of the virtue that hopefully you want society to embody.

D (8:50)

Man, I never, I never saw that.

C (8:51)

This is funny though.

D (8:52)

Such a flashback.

C (8:53)

Look at this. 2014, throw this up. 344. This is, this had one like this. How few people were following Charlie on Twitter at the time in 2014, clothing optional halftime performance. One like I just.

D (9:09)

Oh man.

C (9:10)

That would have been.

D (9:11)

Was he still 20 at that time?

C (9:14)

Yeah, I just think this is amazing. Yeah, I don't know. He was born. Yeah, he was born 21. Yeah.

D (9:20)

No older than 21. Charlie's. It's like the president.

C (9:23)

He's been hammering away at the halftime show.

D (9:25)

There's a tweet for everything.

C (9:25)

There's a tweet for everything. He's been hammering away at it for years and years. And here we are in 2026 and trying to do our best to honor him. And by the way, Charlie loved playing in the cultural space. He wanted to win the culture. I'll never forget, we were sitting down with a reporter in D.C. around the inauguration and won the presidency, obviously. And he goes, what's next? Like, are you guys done? He's like, no, we want to win the culture. And I remember that moment with Charlie really distinctly. And I just think this is exactly the way to honor his wishes, his mission, his legacy is to go straight for the jugular. Go straight for it and take on the cultural behemoth and the cabal and the machine all in one fell swoop. So we're gonna have a good time on Sunday. I hope you guys tune in. As America turns 250 years old this year year, we want to help good ranchers take a moment to remember the people who helped build it. Not the ones in the history books, but the ones who woke up before the sun season after season without seeking any sort of applause. And those people are America's ranchers. For over 250 years, ranchers have worked tirelessly to feed America through every kind of storm. Droughts, wars, recessions, pandemics, changing markets, changing politics, but they never stop. That's the kind of legacy good ranchers was built on. Unlike others, Good ranchers is a meat company, 100% committed to America, not just in words, but in practice. Every cut they offer is raised on local American farms and ranches, from the pasture to the final seal on every box. Their entire packaging and fulfillment process takes place right here in America. And if you ever have questions, their customer support team is also here in America. To top it all off, with every order placed, Good Ranchers donates a portion of its profits to the various veterans organizations. So as we head into a year meant to celebrate American culture, heritage, and the people who shaped it, Good ranchers is standing right at the heart of that story. I'm actually a good rancher subscriber myself. I love it. I love how easy it is to manage my orders. I also love it that if I get busy and I can't get one of the boxes shipped to my house, I just not there to receive it. I can pause or move any order in just A few clicks. It's super simple to do it. It's built around your schedule to support a company that's committed to honoring America's past, present and future. Visit goodranchers.com today and if you subscribe to any of their boxes of 100% American meat, you'll save up to $500 a year. Plus if you use our code, Kirk K I R K, you'll get an additional $25 off your order. That's Kirk K I R K for an additional $25 off your first order. On top of the $500 you already saved this year just for subscribing. So. Goodranchers.com American meat delivered so we gotta do our obligatory super bowl week Roger Goodell takedown. We have to. But I did. We were planning on covering a little bit of the Epstein stuff, but I just. It's too juicy. I wanna. I wanna hit Roger Goodell. We're gonna move that to tomorrow. So if you're wondering why we haven't touched on the Epstein stuff, I have my reasons.

D (12:25)

There's a lot of it.

C (12:26)

I. There's 3 million documents and people are still parsing through a lot of them. And there's stuff on Bill Gates, which is funny, and Elon Musk, which is funny. And the Clintons agreements are going to testify. We're going to get this tomorrow. I want to do it right. So we're going to devote our one to hitting that tomorrow because there's a lot to go through and I think we just have to. But I want to do it right. I don't want to rush it. So instead we're going to hit Roger Goodell, which is always.

D (12:52)

He really wants to hit Roger Goodell.

C (12:54)

Listen, the NFL is like a Vesta. It's like a throwback to Peak woke. Roger Goodell should be in a museum somewhere. It's like he shouldn't be doing the job he's doing. And yet I would more suspect him to be cased in formaldehyde up on some shelf in a scientist's lab because he's acting like it is Peak woke still. And he just is so squish. He's so beta. He's such a bad leader of that amazing league. And so we're just going to hit him. He was asked at the annual super bowl press conference about the lack of diversity in NFL coaches. 3, 10.

E (13:34)

But everybody knows that this cycle was over. 10 for black coaches, 1 for 9 for coaches of color. So should you just be resigned to the fact now that basically Nothing you do can move the numbers between three to seven on coaches and three to seven on general managers. Those historic numbers that we've seen.

F (13:51)

I think we need to continue to make progress and I believe that. I believe diversity is good for us. I think we have become a more diverse league across every platform, including coaching. But we still have more work to do. There's got to be more steps. So we're reevaluating everything we're doing.

D (14:11)

It's, it's like so. It's so. I feel like frankly, Charlie would have a good bit on this. Like, as you say, he should be in a museum. He should be in formaldehyde because he actually is this very, almost the platonic form of this certain type. He's this like, he certainly looks like red America. He's a 66 year old boomer. Yeah, boomer. White male guy who's running a big institution. Like you'd think he's almost. He could be in the dictionary as like, oh, this is a core Republican voter. And yet he's this guy who's overseen an institution that he didn't build. It was gifted to him essentially, or handed to him. And then he almost. To keep himself on top, he gets paid 20, 30, $50 million a year, some insane amount. And he's thought, I can keep control of this by giving in to all of this woke stuff below me, all of this liberal stuff below me. I will midwife this new DEI America into being and they'll all love me for it. And that's the role he plays. And instead he's massively messing it up. He's making a ton of people angry. He's making the NFL worse than it was before when there really wasn't a big problem. Like, are we seriously going to claim that the NFL has a huge racism problem? Like, the entire concept is laughable. They're currently mad. They're mad because there were 10 coach openings and none of the new ones they hired were black one. So what? They want to hire the best coach this year? Didn't happen to go that way. Like right now they're going to go into 2026 with three black coaches. Three out of 32. That's a little over 10%. What's the black share of the country? A little over 10%.

A (15:48)

Wow.

D (15:49)

Wow, what a crisis.

C (15:50)

Yeah, but how many black players are in the NFL?

D (15:52)

Okay, so what? Coaching is a different skill set from playing in the NFL. Why would the same people do it?

C (15:58)

I totally agree. Listen, I think you're right. He is A by the look of him, he's red coated. He's gop.

D (16:08)

That's how they do this to you.

C (16:09)

But here's the thing. He is. He is a vestige of an artifact of a previous, a bygone era of GOP country club Republicanism that proved to be feckless, that couldn't conserve jack, that basically sat on their hands while we lost the country. So you're gonna watch this man sit on his hands while he loses the NFL. That's what you're gonna see. Can't stand this guy. He is. Okay. So he's then asked about Bad Bunny getting political and Green Day, who is famously very anti Trump, but total washed up artist, by the way. 314.

D (16:40)

Bad Bunny made a pretty clear anti ice statement at the Grammys last night. What are you expecting in terms of political statement? Whether that's from Bad Bunny or Green Day or any of the other performers?

F (16:53)

I think everybody in one of the. Listen, Bad Bunny was, and I think that was demonstrated last night, one of the great artists in the world. And that's one of the reasons we chose him. But the other reason is he understood the platform he was on and that this was. This platform is used to unite people and to be able to bring people together. I think Bad Bunny understands that, and I think he'll have a great performance.

D (17:17)

Did he call him Bad Benny there?

C (17:19)

Bad Benny, Bad Benny. Good old Bad Benny. That's how we're gonna be.

D (17:22)

Not our Benny, the bad one.

C (17:23)

Yeah, so Bad Benny, good old Bad Benny. He. So what that translation. That means they had a talk with Bad Benny when he started saying he's gonna wear a dress in celebration of queer icons and queer identity. And they said, could you tone it down just a little bit, please? We got this alternative thing that's happening over here and they're really upset that we booked you. Could you just tone it down? And he said, ice out.

D (17:49)

But what's amazing is I think he's got him kind of by the short hairs, as it were. Like, what? He's not gonna host it again? I don't think they ever really do a repeat super bowl act. There's really nowhere above. If he just says, if he told them, okay, fine, I won't do it. And then he just did it anyway. One, they have no way to stop him. And two, he'll basically be a lib legend forever.

C (18:09)

Of course he can absolutely humiliate. Incentive structure is absolutely in the corner for Bad Benny to humiliate the NFL and to do it with bells on. And to do it and just ride the album sales all the way to the bank.

D (18:25)

And Roger would deserve it. He would deserve it so much.

C (18:28)

Because you have been cucked, Rob, because. Yeah, because you have been hoodwinked by the machine that you created, by the cabal you have overseen and allowed to metastasize. You deserve every.

D (18:39)

He's the perfect bad boomer. He can't preserve.

C (18:42)

An amazing bad boomer and bad Benny. Very excited about this guest. I've been wanting to have him on for a long time. Been watching him just absolutely crush it. And that is Brandon Gill. Representative Brandon Gill from Texas's 26th congressional district. He is the class president of the freshman class in the House. So self described, but I actually think it is probably true. Brandon, welcome to the show. We're honored to have you, Congressman. Thank you.

B (19:13)

Yeah, thanks for having me.

C (19:14)

Absolutely. You've been doing such great work and we have your back 100%. And you are. I think it's funny because actually, truth be told, Charlie got to the point where he was like, don't book Congressman on the show anymore. Waste of rations. It's like nothing happens over there. And it's like you have a zombie house. But you have been amazing and you are making waves because just yesterday you posted about this. I believe it was yesterday. Throw it up there. This is 352. I just sent a letter to Mitch McConnell asking his committee to stop stalling the SAVE Act. 83% of Americans want proof of citizenship to vot. Yet the Senate has done nothing for 300 days. The house did its job, the Senate needs to do theirs. So, Congressman, you went straight for Mitch, the McConnell machine. Tell us about this and why.

B (20:06)

Well, sure, and thanks for having me on. I went there because we passed the SAVE act out of the House almost a year ago. This is, I mean, you guys talk about it all the time. I mean, this is the most common sense piece of legislation you can imagine, simply saying that if you are an illegal alien, you shouldn't be voting in American elections. If you're a foreign national and not a citizen, you shouldn't be voting. So we should have common sense measures like voter ID whenever you register to vote. That's something that almost 85% of Americans in this country agree with. That means that a lot of Democrats agree with us on that. So we passed it out of the House almost a year ago. Now it's sitting in the Senate and that gets taken up procedurally by the Senate Rules committee, which Senator McConnell chairs and what we want to do is be very clear that it is the will of the House for the Senate to get this passed. You guys need to do that. The American people are on our side. So let's get this thing moving and let's put it up for a vote in the Senate in a way that we can actually make this law.

C (21:03)

Yeah, absolutely. Well, and I, you know, I've checked around on this because when we booked you on the show, I wanted to see what the vibe in the Senate was. And I think we can get 50 plus one over there. I don't think you're gonna get Mitch. I don't think you're gonna get Lisa. I don't think you're gonna get Susan. I think you're gonna get Rand. Rand has signed on. Thune has been signaling that he's supportive of it. He said this publicly, that he's gonna take it to a vote. The question is, could you pass this in a reconciliation bill? Could you nuke the filibuster for a funding bill? Get rid of the zombie filibuster? There's all these options. So this looks like it can be a thing. Now, obviously, you're in the House, not the Senate. Right. So taking it back to the House, Speaker Johnson was doing a press conference this morning. I saw him talking about this. There's some confusion here. It's been sent back to the House to add some different stipulations. Does that mean you guys are gonna have to pass it again? Are we gonna be able to pass that? Fill us in on the details there.

B (22:00)

Yeah. So for quick background, we passed multiple appropriations bills out of the House. That includes the DHS funding bill, which funds, you know, the Department of Homeland Security, ice, fema, TSA agents, and everything sort of related in that area. We sent those bills over to the Senate. Now, while they were sitting in the Senate, Senate Democrats decided that they were going to go back on their agreement to pass these bills. And they were doing that because they want to leverage the chaos in Minneapolis in order to stop the President from carrying out his deportation agenda. Obviously, that's not something that we're going to tolerate. It's not something the administration is going to tolerate. So what they did in the Senate is they combined all of those appropriations bills minus the DHS bill and sent it back to the House. What they did is they instead of passing the DHS bill as part of that package, they did a two week continuing resolution to buy two more weeks of time to negotiate that bill. So that whole funding package has Come back to the house. We actually just voted on the rule. The vote is open right now. Last I checked there were two people who are still no on the rule and two people who haven't voted yet. So that's still ongoing. If I were to guess that ends up passing, but again that's playing out in real time right now. The next step is to vote on final package passage which will be and I believe about an hour or so.

C (23:24)

Okay, got it. Hi folks, Andrew Colvett here. I'd like to tell you about my friends over at why Refi. You've probably been hearing me talk about why Refi for some time now. We are all in with these guys. If you or someone you know is struggling with private student loan debt, take my advice and give them a call. Maybe you're behind on your payments, maybe you're even in default. You don't have to live in this nightmare anymore. Yrefi will provide you a custom payment based on your ability to pay. They tailor each loan individually. They can save you thousands of dollars and you can get your life back. We go to campuses all over America and we see student after student who's drowning in private student loan debt. Many of them don't even know how much they owe. Yrefi can help. Just go to whyrefi.com that's the letter Y. Then refi.com and remember Y Refi doesn't care what your credit score is. Just go to yrefi.com and tell them your friend Andrew sent you. Well, let's just go back a step here and show just how wildly popular these simple common sense measures are. You've got Nicki Minaj who is weighing in on this. 331. What sensible, forward thinking, cutting edge leading nation is having a debate on whether or not there should be voter id. And then you have Harry Entin who basically, you know, chimes in and says, yeah, Nikki's right here. The American people agree with her.

G (24:54)

320 the American people are with Nicki Minaj because what are we talking about here? So take a look here. Favor voter ID to vote. Look, I got all this polling on the screen going back since 2018. You'll notice on all of it, all north of 75%, 76%, 76%, 76%, 76%, 81%. And then 83% in the last year of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj. They favor photo ID to be able to vote.

C (25:22)

Yeah, but here's the thing, Brandon. Cuz it's really a form of slavery and it's like a throwback to Jim Crow. This is what Sunny Hostin has to say about it.

H (25:31)

321 it's sort of a vestige of I think post slavery laws where they, where black people had to prove their right to vote and oftentimes they couldn't vote because they couldn't pass some crazy test or they didn't have the appropriate id. It also affects women, women that are married. Maybe one your passport reflects something that's different on your, on your birth certificate or on your driver's license. So really the bottom line is voter suppression. And I agree with him 100%. It's a brilliant notion that less voter ID laws allows more people to vote. And most democracies do it that way. We're the only ones that really don't do it that way.

C (26:15)

Congressman. Do most democracies do it this way? And are you guys trying to keep married women from voting? Which by the way, married women vote the most conservative of all the female groups. So this is a really dumb thing to suggest anyways. Go ahead, Congressman.

B (26:31)

Right, I know. And what the leftists, they're trying to deflect here. The reality is that what the left wants after four years of open borders is to bring in millions upon millions of people into the country illegally, provide a path to citizenship, eventually give them voting rights. But in the meantime they want those illegal aliens to impact congressional apportionment and to figure out ways to vote. In our election systems. It's a way of sort of systematically rigging our elections in favor of Democrats at the expense of Republicans. What we're doing is we're simply saying no, you know, you've got to use a, you got to have a birth certificate to show, to show your age to play in Little League baseball. I mean, you got to show, you got to show a passport oftentimes to travel in the United States or to travel abroad certainly. So this is about as basic as it gets. And again, what Democrats are doing here is not trying to fight for voting rights or any of that nonsense that you hear every day is fundamentally what they're trying to do is erode the meaning of American citizenship and erode the distinction between US citizens and foreign foreigners who are in the United States. We're saying that if everybody can vote in the United States, if every foreign national, if every illegal alien is going to the polls and voting in our federal elections, which means if an illegal alien votes in a blue state, that impacts me and my constituents in Texas for federal elections, then you're eroding, you're essentially disenfranchising voters in red states or voters across the country. And we're saying we've had enough of this. You know, a core part of national sovereignty is being able to determine that the people who are a part of the body politic, who are citizens who have sort of, you know, bought into the social contract of the United States, are the ones who get, and the only ones who get to determine how our government is run. And that's again, that's something that most Americans agree with. It's such a basic, you know, core civic principle that we're trying to get back to. But the left is fighting against us because, and you guys know this very well, they see the Saved act, they see illegal aliens voting and they say that is our ticket to electorally winning in the United States. Again, it's a way of systematically rigging our elections. That's why they see this as an existential threat.

C (28:45)

Well, and if you look at the just domestic immigration inside the United States, blue states are losing population, they're losing native born Americans that hate the taxes, they hate the crime, they hate the regulations, they hate the malaise. I will tell you, I just moved from California, came to Arizona. You could feel the malaise in California. You can just feel it. You can feel businesses are struggling, nobody wants to hire anybody there because it's a terrible place to do business. So they're voting with their feet and they're getting out. And that's gonna affect the electoral college, that's gonna affect apportionments in Congress 100%. You're gonna see those chickens come home to roost in 2030 in a big way. But in the meantime, this is why they're fighting against DHS so hard. Cuz guess who's moving into those places? Guess who they're protecting? Illegals. And there's a reason for that. All the grift, all the fraud, all the bilking taxpayer money. There's that news story that came out of Southern California with all those hospice centers within like a two mile radius. And I mean this is truly remarkable levels of fraud. And obviously the Somali story in Minneapolis kicked it off. But I have more bad news for Sunny. Hostin. Hostin, Hostin, whatever. The gal from one of the cackling hens from the View. We've got some polling on black Americans and where they're at on voter ID as well. 355.

G (29:59)

Take a look here. Favorite photo ID to vote. 85% of white people favor it, 82% of Latino, 76% of black Americans favor it. So the bottom line is this, voter ID is not controversial in this country. A photo ID to vote is not controversial in this country. It is not controversial by party and it is not controversial by race. The vast majority of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj that in fact you should have a photo ID to be able to vote.

D (30:25)

So something of a non.

C (30:27)

Okay, so let's just big picture here. You've got the voters who want it. You've got black, white, Hispanic voters that want it. Seems to me the only group that doesn't want this is like Stacey Abrams, Sunny Hostin, Hakeem Jeffries. Why the disconnect? What do Democrat leaders know that their voters don't?

B (30:50)

Well, I mean, this has been the Democrat plan for a long time. And you know, this isn't a right wing conspiracy theory to say that Democrats are trying to import voters and in order to get more Democrat voters. I mean, there's a book that came out about 20 years ago called the Emerging Democratic Majority. I mean, the thesis of the work is saying that essentially demographic changes in the United States politically benefit Democrats and that is one of the ways that Democrats can hold on to power long term. So if you're an American citizen, it doesn't matter if you'reif you're white, if you're black, or if you're Hispanic or any other race, you recognize that eroding these principles and these ideas that really only hold the citizens voting rights, for instance, essentially disenfranchises American voters.

C (31:36)

Yeah, well, and Brandon, specifically Texas, that's their big, big get. That's the white whale for the Democrats. We gotta fight and save Texas. Gotta keep Texas bright ruby red. So we love seeing new stars like yourself rise up in the ranks, doing great work in Congress. Keep up the great work, Congressman. You're doing a phenomenal job.

B (31:57)

Well, I appreciate that. We've got a whole lot more work to do and we've got a lot more fighting to do.

C (32:02)

All right. God bless you, Blake. Are you living on stolen land? I think all of us, I just want you to go off on the concept of stolen land.

D (32:12)

So this is great. So this happened. We talked about this a little bit yesterday. Let's revisit it. So we talked about the Grammys and one of the big lines that we really teed off on was Billie Eilish and declared that all everyone has the right to come here because no one is illegal on stolen land. Let's revisit it. 292, please.

B (32:29)

No one is illegal on stolen land.

D (32:36)

Now a thing we didn't show but we should have yesterday is as it happens, she has a quite palatial of course state. She's extraordinarily whatever 293 with a very big wall and gate around it. It is not a super publicly accessible thing. But there's an excellent twist or follow up on this. So of course Eilish lives in the Los Angeles area and there are some indigenous former inhabitants or, you know, tribes that are native to the Los Angeles basin. And it's the Tongva tribe. And some members of this tribe got in contact with the media and they pointed out we don't believe that we have ceded our land in this area. And so they released a statement to Fox News. As the first people of the. Let's see.

C (33:26)

The greater Los Angeles Basin.

D (33:27)

Of the Los Angeles Basin. We understand that her home is situated in our ancestral land. Eilish has not contacted our tribe directly regarding her property. We do not. Scott. Update value the instance when public figures provide visibility to the true history of this country. Or we do value. I guess but. So it seems that she lives on stolen land.

C (33:50)

She lives on stolen land.

D (33:51)

Which means if no one can be illegal on stolen land, can you illegally trespass on Billie Eilish's property? And I think we should put this to the test. I think someone should get in contact with this tribe and offer them whatever supplies they need, whatever legal funds they need. If you guys want to do a demonstration, I think it might be time to occupy Billie Eilish's land.

C (34:14)

I think we need a CHOP city on Billie Eilish's palatial estate.

D (34:18)

Yeah.

C (34:18)

I think we need chop. We need the summer of love and Billy, Billy, you've really hemmed yourself in here. You're in a rock and a hard place on stolen land. You're living in. You're living in a palatial estate.

D (34:31)

Los Angeles Basin autonomous zone.

C (34:33)

Yes. There it is. I think that this needs to happen.

D (34:36)

Labop.

C (34:37)

Yeah. I mean, listen Bill, you've got enough money. You can buy another one if this doesn't work out. It'll be fine.

D (34:43)

Or, you know, she could do the right thing and she could bequeath it back.

C (34:46)

Just give it to them.

D (34:47)

To the tribe.

C (34:48)

Yeah. Make this.

D (34:49)

She says stolen land.

C (34:51)

She's rich enough. She could just do it. Yeah, and she could. You could own the high. You could take the high route here, Billy. You could be the solution to the problem. You can be the. You can be the white savior.

D (35:06)

Billie Eilish, this is not even really a joke. There's, you know, the classic Saul Alinsky tactic is to, you know, make, make the opponent live by its own rules rather strictly. And you should make these commies who want to abolish America live at least for a moment by their own rules. And to zoom back on this. The point is to show that this is a crass absurdity. America is not a stolen country. It is not on stolen land any more than any other country and society in human history is stolen land. Or for that matter, any more than all the tribes in America were on stolen land. If you want an example that calls to mind for me from the Dakotas, we have the Lakota people there. They complain that the Black Hills were stolen from them. Europeans have owned the Black Hills longer than the Lakota owned the Black Hills. But because they yoinked it from another tribe just shortly before, after they got the horse, they expanded. And that's all of human history. All of human history is this or that. Stone Age people, Bronze Age people moving around, constantly taking things. What actually gave us the concept of ownership and for that matter the concept of theft and property and all of that is civilization and law. And that is why you can't just steal somebody's land today. It's a great thing.

C (36:18)

But they want.

D (36:19)

They hate those laws, they hate the west, they hate civilization. So they use those concepts to undermine them and blow them up. And it's just a pure anti civilizational resentment. But if Eilish is going to indulge that, make her live by it.

C (36:32)

I love that. Well said. Make Billie Eilish give back her stolen land. Her stolen mansion needs to go back to. What's the tribe's name?

D (36:40)

It is the. What's the Tongva. That sounds like Pacific Island Drive or.

C (36:46)

Something like a South Pacific. Billie Eilish, we are hereby calling on you to give back your mansion to the Tongva tribe in the Greater Los Angeles basin. You need to do it now. Do it today. You are rich enough to buy another piece of land on a non stolen piece of property on planet Earth. We're not sure what qualifies as non stolen at this point based on your guys faulty logic.

D (37:08)

But honestly I think we know it qualifies as non stolen if you know it's not white people living in.

C (37:13)

You could buy Jeffrey Epstein's island. Buy it? Yes, she could buy that. That would not be probably stolen land.

D (37:21)

Probably.

C (37:21)

I don't know where you're gonna find some non stolen land. Even the UK is you could make the argument is stolen, right? Well, no.

D (37:27)

And the UK belongs to everybody. That's what they say now. Well, we can go deep down that rabbit hole. But if you're not willing to do all of those things, Billy, then we have another good take on what you're supposed to do. This is Ricky Gervais. It's 363.

I (37:41)

If you do win an award tonight, don't use it as a platform to make a political speech, right? You're in no position to lecture the public about anything. You know nothing about the real world. Most of you spent less time in school than Greta Thunberg. So if you win, right, come up, accept your little award, thank your agent and your God and off.

J (38:06)

For more on many of these stories.

D (38:07)

And news you can Trust, go to.

J (38:09)

Charliekirk.Com hi Kevin McCullough. Think fossil fuels are climate villains that the legacy media and establishment politicos ask us to believe that they are? Think again. Did you know that fossil fuels power the systems that keep us safe from air conditioning that prevents heat stroke to heating systems that protect against extreme cold. They also provide low cost power for our storm warning systems giving us time to evacuate and save lives. Forget being a villain, fossil fuels have literally been the hero in the prevention of billions of deaths and the extension of life. In fact, over the past century, deaths from climate related disasters like extreme temperatures, droughts, floods, storms, wildfires have declined by 98% thanks to fossil fueled infrastructure and technology. I'm Calvin McCullough and I just want you to know the facts. Don't be fossil fooled. Get the full picture@oilfacts.com brought to you by Nasdaq listed Prairie Operating Group, a high growth, low cost producer of safe and responsible American energy. That's oilfacts.com oilfacts.com.