Ask Charlie Anything 214: Picking Campus Visits? Vegas Shooting Truth? 2025's Most Crucial Election?

Summary

The Charlie Kirk Show - Episode 214 Summary: "Ask Charlie Anything: Picking Campus Visits? Vegas Shooting Truth? 2025's Most Crucial Election?"

Release Date: March 10, 2025

In Episode 214 of The Charlie Kirk Show, host Charlie Kirk engages with his audience in an interactive "Ask Me Anything" format, addressing a wide array of pressing topics ranging from campus tour strategies to national security concerns and the significance of upcoming elections. This detailed summary encapsulates the key discussions, insights, and conclusions drawn during the episode.

---

1. Selecting Campus Tours

Anthony's Inquiry: The episode kicks off with Anthony, a member, inquiring about the criteria used to select campus tour locations. Charlie emphasizes the pragmatic approach behind these choices, primarily focusing on proximity to Arizona and family considerations.

Key Points:

• Public vs. Private Schools: Charlie highlights the challenges of organizing tours in private institutions due to restrictive filming and participation agreements. He laments the limitations imposed by defamation clauses in private schools, which he believes necessitate defunding such institutions.

  "Public schools are allowed to film and talk to students, but private schools have tons of restrictions to protect their brand. It's outrageous." (02:00)

• Regional Focus: The tours predominantly occur in the Southwest and North regions, with upcoming plans to expand to the Midwest and a notable stop in the Northeast, weather permitting.

  "In the winter, I'm not going to go to Boston until the weather gets better because I can't do an outdoor event there right now." (02:10)

---

2. Federal Workforce and Government Spending

Scott's Concern: Scott raises a critical issue regarding the inefficiency of federal bureaucracy, specifically citing his struggles with the Social Security office in Boise. He expresses concern over President Trump's administration's efforts to reduce government size and the potential roadblocks from established bureaucratic structures.

Discussion Highlights:

• Government Workforce Cuts: Charlie acknowledges the complexity of reducing federal employees but suggests that significant cuts could be achieved by targeting a reduction of 60-70% of certain federal operations.

  "Removing federal workers is very hard, but government running at 60 to 70% is possible." (05:41)

• Budget Analysis: Andrew elaborates on the federal budget, pointing out that while payroll constitutes a fraction, the majority of spending is directed towards contracts, military equipment, grants, and entitlements.

  "Most of the federal government spending is take in money or print money and then route it to something." (06:00)

• Entitlement Reforms: The conversation underscores the necessity of addressing entitlements and overall spending to manage the national deficit effectively.

  "At least not just headcount." (06:02)

• Historical Context: Charlie references the erosion of the filibuster over the past decade, initiated by Harry Reid, which has facilitated significant judicial appointments without substantial opposition.

  "There's been a decade-long erosion of the filibuster, starting with Harry Reid." (36:04)

---

3. National Security and Drone Threats

Scott's Experience: Scott shares a personal anecdote about a near-miss drone encounter, highlighting the growing threat drones pose to national security, especially in public venues like stadiums and significant landmarks.

Key Insights:

• Emerging Threats: Charlie and Andrew discuss the implications of drone proliferation in modern warfare and terrorism, citing the Ukraine war as an example where inexpensive drones have significant strategic impacts.

  "The future of warfare is, oh, you can make a drone for a thousand bucks that can carry a bomb wherever you want and just explode." (13:29)

• Government Preparedness: There's a consensus that current U.S. government measures are insufficient to counteract the escalating drone threats, necessitating urgent attention and improved counter-drone systems.

  "Drones are a serious problem. We had a very near miss with our family this week in a really serious way." (12:37)

• Impact on Security Protocols: The discussion extends to how traditional security measures need to evolve to address the versatile and mobile threats drones present.

  "What is preventing terrorists equipped with drones from attacking open-air sports stadiums?" (13:44)

---

4. The Crucial 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court Election

Shane's Concern: Shane emphasizes the pivotal nature of the upcoming Wisconsin Supreme Court election, describing it as the most critical election of 2025. He underscores the importance of voter turnout and the potential consequences of low participation.

Discussion Points:

• Turnout vs. Persuasion: Charlie and Andrew dissect the dynamics of turnout elections versus persuasion campaigns, with Shane advocating for strategies to maximize voter participation rather than attempting to sway undecided voters.

  "If you had the number of people who voted in the presidential race come and turn out in that race, you would crush them." (16:21)

• Historical Comparisons: Andrew draws parallels to past elections, illustrating how increased turnout could have significantly altered outcomes in low-profile races.

  "John McCain lost Wisconsin by 14 points in 2008, and if you had his number of votes here, you would win by 20 points." (17:23)

• Actionable Steps: Charlie announces his intention to campaign in Wisconsin, highlighting its strategic importance for national politics and expressing commitment to mobilize voters.

  "This is the most important election of 2025, and we're coming to Wisconsin next Monday to ensure it stays in contention." (16:53)

---

5. Prison System Expenditure and Potential Fraud

Stan's Inquiry: Stan brings attention to the exorbitant costs associated with the prison system, questioning the allocation of funds towards amenities for inmates and suggesting potential targets for budget cuts.

Key Insights:

• Cost Breakdown: Andrew explains that while prisons are predominantly state-funded, a significant portion of expenses arises from contracts, military spending, and grants administered by departments like Education.

  "Department of Education doesn't have many employees, but it has a pretty big budget because it administers the student loan program." (06:20)

• Fraud Concerns: The conversation touches upon the possibilities of fraud and waste within these expenditures, with Andrew advocating for technological solutions like AI to detect irregularities.

  "Use GROK to find PPP loan fraud and highlight glaring examples for public awareness." (07:37)

• Prison Amenities: Charlie criticizes the lavish treatment of inmates, comparing them to hotel guests, and underscores the financial burden on taxpayers and the families of inmates.

  "Prisoners are treated like hotel guests with PlayStations and TVs, which burdens taxpayers." (17:48)

---

6. Concerns Over ActBlue and Fundraising Transparency

Curtis's Observation: Curtis raises suspicions about recent fundraising activities on ActBlue, drawing parallels to money laundering schemes depicted in "Breaking Bad," and questioning the transparency of Democratic funding.

Discussion Highlights:

• Potential Fraud: Charlie considers the possibility of both foreign-originated and traditional criminal activities influencing ActBlue's fundraising, while Andrew counters by acknowledging legitimate, albeit passionate, Democratic donors.

  "The more sinister accusation is that it's Chinese or Iranian originated, but there's also just good old-fashioned criminal activity." (21:18)

• User Behavior: Andrew shares an anecdote about a Daily Caller investigation revealing that some donors repeatedly contribute large sums out of political passion rather than fraudulent intent.

  "A Democratic donor said, 'I watch the news all day, get worked up, and send another $20.'" (22:48)

• Platform Efficiency: Both agree that ActBlue's user-friendly interface facilitates easy, frequent donations, making it a potent tool for political fundraising.

  "ActBlue is like Amazon.com for giving money. It saves all your payment information, making donations seamless." (23:04)

---

7. Transparency in Government Files and Event Investigations

Curtis's Grief and Demand for Accountability: Curtis shares a heartbreaking personal story about his father's death in a nursing home during COVID-19 and criticizes Governor Andrew Cuomo's mishandling of the pandemic, calling for accountability and the reopening of investigations into malpractices.

Key Points:

• Government Accountability: Curtis demands that administrations be held accountable for their actions during the pandemic, citing deliberate actions that led to unnecessary deaths in nursing homes.

  "Andrew Cuomo deliberately put COVID-positive patients in nursing homes, leading to thousands of deaths." (40:15)

• Reopening Investigations: Charlie and Curtis advocate for the reopening of investigations into Cuomo and other governors who mishandled the pandemic, stressing the need for justice and transparency.

  "I would love to see that criminal investigation relaunched." (42:16)

• Broader Call for Documentation Release: The final question before the episode ends centers on the release of historical documents related to JFK, MLK Jr., and the 2017 Vegas shooting. Charlie expresses unanimous support for full transparency.

  "We need Epstein, JFK, MLK, the Vegas shooting files—all of them, no redaction." (44:42)

---

8. Election Reforms and the Filibuster Debate

Ted's Question on Filibuster: Ted, another member, brings up the ongoing debate over the filibuster in the Senate, questioning whether reforms should be made to facilitate legislation.

Discussion Highlights:

• Filibuster’s Role: Charlie defends the filibuster's importance in preventing hasty legislative actions and safeguarding against extreme policies, especially those that could lead to the statehood of D.C. and Puerto Rico without broad consensus.

  "The filibuster is a guarantee to slow down the process and ensure crazy ideas like adding D.C. and Puerto Rico as states can't happen with a simple majority vote." (35:12)

• Historical Erosion: He recounts the gradual dismantling of the filibuster over the past decade, leading to significant judicial appointments without bipartisan support.

  "We've seen the slow erosion of the filibuster, facilitating the appointment of judges like Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett." (36:04)

• Strategic Caution: Charlie cautions against eliminating the filibuster now, arguing that doing so could set dangerous precedents if the opposing party gains control in the future.

  "If you get rid of it, it's a Pandora's box; the Democrats could use it against us when they gain power." (36:43)

• Andrew's Counterpoint: Andrew critiques the filibuster as a tool that both parties exploit to avoid voting on issues they nominally support, suggesting that its removal could lead to more transparent and decisive legislative actions.

  "The filibuster is fake; it's maintained because both parties have an interest in not voting on things they want." (35:12)

---

9. Positive Feedback and Future Engagements

Member Interactions: Throughout the episode, Charlie interacts warmly with his members, acknowledging their contributions and encouraging active participation in upcoming events and initiatives.

Notable Exchanges:

• Blake's Advocacy: Blake, a rancher from Eastern Oregon, seeks Charlie's assistance in connecting with the Department of Agriculture to voice grassroots concerns about meatpacking monopolies and agricultural policies. Charlie pledges to facilitate this connection.

  "We use the term grassroots a lot. You actually are grassroots in what you are doing." (27:24)

• Stan's Chapter Inquiry: Stan from Dallas expresses interest in establishing a Turning Point USA chapter in his area. Charlie personally invites him to a pro-life event in Plano, Texas, underscoring the community-building aspect of his organization.

  "I will be in Plano at the Renaissance Dallas at the Plano Legacy West Hotel speaking at a pro-life event tomorrow evening. We'd love to have you." (28:22)

---

10. Final Thoughts and Closing Remarks

As the episode progresses towards its conclusion, Charlie reiterates his commitment to transparency, national security, and empowering his conservative base through grassroots activism. He thanks his members for their support and encourages ongoing engagement through various platforms.

"Email us as always, [e-mail]. Thanks so much for listening and God bless." (45:20)

---

Conclusion: Episode 214 of The Charlie Kirk Show offers a comprehensive exploration of critical issues facing America in early 2025. From internal government inefficiencies and national security threats to the pivotal role of voter turnout in key elections, Charlie Kirk provides insightful commentary and strategic viewpoints. Engaging with his audience's real concerns, Kirk emphasizes the importance of grassroots activism, transparency, and maintaining conservative values amidst evolving political and social landscapes.

---

For more detailed discussions and to listen to the full episode, visit charliekirk.com.

Transcript

[Charlie Kirk]

Hey, everybody, Ask Me Anything episode. We take questions from you about the Department of Agriculture, the Las Vegas shooting, the JFK files, and more. If you want to be on this program, become a member today. Members.charliekirk.com that is members.charliekirk.com so check it out right now. Members.charliekink.com Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.

[Blake]

Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.

[Andrew]

I want you to know we are.

[Charlie Kirk]

Lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

[Andrew]

Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

[Charlie Kirk]

I want to thank Charlie.

[Andrew]

Charlie's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country.

[Charlie Kirk]

He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point usa. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble gold [e-mail] that is noblegoldinvestments.com it's where I buy all of my gold. Go to noblegoldinvestments.commembers.charliekirk.com I have Mr. Blake with me to copilot if necessary. It has been a long week, but.

[Andrew]

A good week, a very exciting week. This was a blast.

[Charlie Kirk]

Andrew and Blake both deserve great credit for prepping me for the Gavin Newsom discussion. Not an easy challenge for many reasons.

[Andrew]

Yeah, you know, it was. It was a very fun. It was different, you know, okay, we're going against a major left wing politician, and he's going in with his own agenda. You know, he's not doing this on a lark.

[Curtis]

He.

[Charlie Kirk]

But also in a very friendly.

[Andrew]

But it was friendly. Yeah. We were thinking we can't just go in and say, like, Gavin, you're terrible, you're evil, and like, blow it up because he invited us all.

[Charlie Kirk]

That kind of looks cringey.

[Andrew]

That's impolite. That's not chivalrous. That's bad. But at the same time, we do know he has his own agenda with this. He very likely wants to run for president. He very likely realizes he needs to pivot towards the center. So even though we want to push our views, we don't want it to. We don't want to just be laundering. Like, oh, Gavin, you're a great moderate now. And I think we navigated that very well.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes. And made a lot of headlines, made a lot of news. So thank you for the prep. And by the way, we're going to be posting a podcast episode of my reaction of it in its entirety. So make sure you guys subscribe to our podcast the whole hour. This hour. Guess who my guest is. Members. You guys, if you are a member. Members.charliekirk.com you can join this program. All our members.charliekirk.Com so let's get to the first one here. Anthony. Anthony, thank you for being a member. What is on your mind? Hey, Charlie, I got a question. So I get this asked a lot. How do you guys select your campus tours? Because from what I can tell, it's mostly the south west coast and a little bit in the north, you know, so. Great question. It's not nearly as dynamic as you might think of an answer. First and foremost, it's. Is it close to Arizona? I like to be around my family. Number two, the criteria going to private schools is, like, impossible. We just did a certain private school. I'm not even allowed to say the name of the private school on air because they made us sign some agreement. But you can guess what private school I was at. Literally, there's, like, defamation clauses. It's just insane. There's a lot of loops, and it's so terrible. Right. This is why these schools should need to be totally defunded. And so. But public schools are. Yeah, it was not ucla, so I'll let you guess which one it was. It wasn't ucla. Guess which other one it was. Anyway, don't even say it on air, Blake. Cause it's like, there's all this.

[Andrew]

We can neither confirm nor deny.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, but I think all the public literally had to take down tweets and stuff.

[Andrew]

There may be videos of it, but those could be deepfakes.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes, exactly. So, but the essence is this, though. Public schools, you're allowed to film. You're allowed to talk to students. Private schools, there's like, no filming allowed. Tons of restrictions, because they're like, we have to protect our brand. Like, they're super. It's outrageous. And so. But secondly, yeah, look, the Northeast is not always friendly to us, but sometimes there's a less sexy answer. Anthony. In the winter, I'm not going to go to Boston until the weather gets better because I can't do an outdoor event in Boston right now. So the south, it's fun and it's nice this time of year. Yeah. Four degrees, five degrees. Right. And so the. But the, the other part of this though that's important is we try to hit, at least in the election, we were hitting states that had some sort of involvement in the election. So all the schools in Nevada, all the schools in Arizona, all the schools in Georgia and we're trying to pepper around. So as the weather gets better, I'm doing Midwest schools. We haven't announced all of our tour stops and I do have a special stop coming in the Northeast soon, a very, very good one in the Northeast. So thank you, Anthony, for being a member. Deeply appreciate it. Good to hear your voice. Thanks Charlie. Scott is next. Scott, thank you for being a member. Members.charliekirk.com Scott, what's on your mind? Hey Charlie, how are you?

[Scott]

I want to talk about the fact. Yeah, I mean this is a real personal issue for me. It affects our children. But the federal bureaucracy here in Boise, the Social Security office, we call them and they don't even answer the phone. And then when you try to go there in person, they say, hey, you got to make an appointment by phone. So to me it's clear President Trump and people don't talk about this enough. He is a revolutionary president, not incrementalist, but revolutionary. He wants to make these big cuts in government, but I'm really concerned that establishment DC is gonna slow down and kill his efforts. So what percentage of the federal workforce do you think Trump, Doge and the Cabinet will be able to cut in the next 12 months?

[Charlie Kirk]

So I don't know. I wanna make sure I manage and taper your expectations. Cuz removing federal workers is very hard. But what they should be able to cut based on the government running 60 to 70%. Now, as Blake astutely points out, if we want to really go after the deficit though, eventually you have to go after entitlements, is that right?

[Andrew]

Or you have to go after spending.

[Charlie Kirk]

At least like not just, not just headcount.

[Andrew]

The thing about, the thing about headcount is the federal government's budget is like $7 trillion at this point or something. And the actual amount spent on just payroll for federal employees is I think maybe 250, $300 billion, if that.

[Charlie Kirk]

And there is a pension component to it.

[Andrew]

Exactly, exactly. But most of the federal government spending is take in money or print money and then route it to something.

[Charlie Kirk]

Now contracts are also a big part of the budget.

[Andrew]

Contracts, contractors are a big part. A lot of spending on contracts. But it's also spending on military equipment that is money that's going to make it purchasing. And then of course grants. So Department of Education, for example.

[Charlie Kirk]

Department.

[Andrew]

Department of Education doesn't have many employees, but it has a pretty big budget because it administers the student loan program, which is money going to people who are borrowing. It's really money going to colleges. They handle title one grants. So that's just tax money goes to a public school and that is where most spending is. And that's really where a lot of savings could be. Even just if you're looking for fraud, for waste, you can find that out there. I think one of the greatest things Grok. I said grok. I was thinking of the AI Doge could do would be grok it up. Use GROK to find for example, like obviously those PPP loans that happened during COVID huge amounts of fraud. And you could almost like make an example out of just find like 10 really glaring examples and you know, perp walk them. That would be good moral support for the American people.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, and I just. Let's dive more into this. It's a great question, by the way, and I'm sorry about your experience in Boise with the Social Security administration. Hopefully that gets cleaned up. And by the way, modernizing government is just something that needs to happen. It's so antiquated, it's so slow, it's so non responsive. But Blake, let's dive into this more. Post Covid, a new baseline has basically been set in where there's this expectation of the size, scope and power of the government that did not exist pre Covid. It's almost doubled in size in 5 years.

[Andrew]

Especially size like this came up we were talking about the other day where they're trying to make a scandal out of the VA's budget and there's talk, okay, Trump might make cuts to the va. Well, it would be cuts to the number of people who worked at the VA in 2019. You know, it's.

[Charlie Kirk]

Which was when Trump was president.

[Andrew]

Trump was president and he'd also already done big improvements to the VA at that time. Like it was working pretty well. And since then we have a lower number of veterans. The number of veterans is declining.

[Charlie Kirk]

So what we're trying to just get back to 2019. Baseline creates massive uproar. So baseline budgeting is one of the original sins of Washington D.C. which every year you have to go back to the prior year baseline. You can't actually start at what's called zero based budgeting and say, okay, every year what do we need and why do we need it? We talk about the previous baseline. My fear though is that the Senate and the House are not going to cut nearly as much as they should.

[Andrew]

I mean it's painful to cut every. There's the thing about cuts is someone has to be a loser when you reduce spending. And so Washington, it fears any sort.

[Charlie Kirk]

Of pain because power is their life.

[Andrew]

Power is their life force. And it's just, you know, there you're always the bad guy if you're the one who has to come in and say, you know, the endless money train is going away. And you know, I don't, I don't blame them for being wary to the extent that, you know, they want to get reelected. But at the same time a huge amount of public trust has been put, has been invested.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's also the well being of the.

[Andrew]

Nation, the well being of the nation. And it's offensive that you have to worry like wonder are they just going to keep spending until finally the hot potato explodes and then that person takes all the blame. And it seems a lot of Washington has made that calculation.

[Charlie Kirk]

You could say that we are on the verge of a fiscal collapse.

[Andrew]

All I will say is I have never heard of a country that just borrowed forever and got away with it. Eventually a debt comes due.

[Charlie Kirk]

You know your history pretty well. Making America great again starts with making America healthy again. Charlie Kirk here. I lost 40 pounds with the PhD weight loss and nutrition program and two years later I haven't gained a pound back. I started the PhD weight loss program because I need to be healthy to keep up with my crazy schedule. Most people start a weight loss program to get healthier. So why is big Pharma spending millions to convince you to use their weight loss injections that do just the opposite. They have harmful side effects and lifelong dependency. Take a natural approach that isn't connected to a Big pharma bottom line. PhD changes the way you think about food. They custom design a plan that is simple and works with your schedule. You'll learn to quiet cravings and finally release the unhealthy belly fat. You won't be hungry and you'll never take medication. Call 864-644-1900 to schedule your one on one consultation or or visit myphdweightloss.com that is myphdweightloss.com 864-644-1900 okay, your second question.

[Scott]

Hey Charlie. So really it's a question that affects everybody here, but I want you to understand where it comes from. You know, these Wuhan virus lockdowns had a lifelong negative impact on the life of Our son. That's why we were reaching out to Social Security for disability. And I want to do my part to expose these government lies like, you know, Megan McCain says, I want revenge. And one of the biggest lies in the government's claim about us is they can control US Airspace and protect us from drones, like at Oxen Stadium. And I can say for a fact that counter drone systems can't protect Americans at stadiums, airports, and downtown areas like the US Capitol and the White House. Now, this is. This is the point, and I'm. You guys, this is really foolish, but you're. You're a father, too. So I'm willing to bet my life savings, okay, to get attention to this, $100,000. By the way, I have all the respect in the world for Mark Andreessen, but he invested in the best counter drone company called Andrell. And I'm willing to bet that he can't stop me and my friends from crashing a drone in the stands at Austin Stadium during a test when the stadium is empty. Right. And don't you want to know if you and your family and friends are protected at Austin? I mean, they can't protect the White House. They can't protect, you know, dca. I mean, this is something that people need to know about.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm serious. I got it. I agree. And no, Blake, they don't know about that. We had a drone encounter in our family recently. We're not talking about that yet. Drones are a serious problem. We had a very near miss of a drone with our family this week in a really serious way. I don't want to get too much into detail there.

[Scott]

Yes.

[Charlie Kirk]

But anyway, the development and the proliferation of drones is very scary. I don't think the US Government is nearly adequately prepared. And I would imagine your contention is correct, Blake, what your thoughts on it.

[Andrew]

It's really scary because when you think, like, for example, the Ukraine war, a big reason actually that, you know, Ukraine hasn't collapsed actually, is they could just get insanely cheap, like drones on each end, and it makes it, like, so hard to advance because you can just fly, like a suicide drone bomb into something, and you kind of wonder. We spend a trillion dollars on our military. We have a ton of tanks, a ton of ships, a ton of planes. And it could be that the future of warfare is, oh, you can make, you know, a drone about yay big for a thousand bucks, and it can carry a bomb wherever you want and just explode.

[Charlie Kirk]

And it is changing warfare as we.

[Andrew]

Changing warfare changes security. Because, you know, imagine. Imagine like the Secret Service. And now instead of having to look for a sniper, any robot could just, you know, put a rifle on it and it can fly anywhere.

[Charlie Kirk]

It's a great point and also that I don't want to fear monger, but what is preventing a couple terrorists equipping drones going to open air sports stadiums? I don't think law enforcement is ready for that.

[Andrew]

Just the biggest limiter on terrorism of all sorts has always just been not that many people want to do it, but especially if you can do it with machines. Like it becomes easy. Like at least in the past doing something really bad was kind of a suicide thing. But now it doesn't even have to be that you can build a machine that does it.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, Shane, Shane is here. Thank you for being a member. What is on your mind?

[Andrew]

Hey Charlie, real quick. I saw the poster behind you regarding Wisconsin and since I live in Wisconsin, I wanted to know what that meant. The travel to Wisconsin and chase 100 ballots.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes. Are you, are you familiar with the upcoming Supreme Court race?

[Andrew]

I am not actually.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, not your fault. But that is, that is really illuminating. Again, you're busy, a lot of stuff going on, but this is why it's so important, why we're doing what we're doing. This is the most important election of 2025. In fact, I think there's a Wall Street Journal op ed that says that today. So just. And by the way, God bless you. What's your name again?

[Andrew]

Shane.

[Charlie Kirk]

Shane. This is why I'm coming to Wisconsin a week from Monday. This is the most important election happening in the country. It's a, it's for this year. It is for a Supreme Court seat that will determine the future of the entire Wisconsin Supreme Court, you say? Oh, so what? That involves your congressional maps, your voter integrity measures, everything associated alongside of it. So what we are doing is we're helping chase ballots similar to what we kind of did back in November to try and raise and drive awareness about this off election. Low turnout election. Blake, while I try to find this op ed, can you talk about how it is a strictly turnout election? This is not a persuasion election.

[Andrew]

Exactly, exactly. So when you look at any election, you know there's a certain amount of people who turn out for it. And so I bet we can even look up here where it's like Wisconsin in the 2024 presidential race is going to be. Let's see how many people voted in.

[Charlie Kirk]

3 million.

[Andrew]

Yeah, so about 3 million people. Yeah. You're almost 3.3.3 million. It looks like the top of my head. So 3.3 million people voted in the 2024. Now let's check. We had a 2023 Supreme Court race in Wisconsin.

[Charlie Kirk]

I bet. Let me just guess. I bet a million people voting it.

[Andrew]

Let's go check. I think it's a bit higher than that, but we'll check here. One point, about 1.8 million. So literally about barely half as maybe like 60% as many votes as in the presidential race. And we lost that one, I believe.

[Charlie Kirk]

And yeah, we got crossed.

[Andrew]

Yeah, we lost by 10 points. But if you had the number of people who voted in the 2024 presidential election come and turn out in that race, or even the number of people who voted in 2020 when we finished in second, ultimately, like, if you had that many people turn out, you would win by a mile. It's not even. Oh, you would eke out a win. You would crush them. It is entirely a matter of turnout. It is who gets their people to care about this race that is not in a normal election cycle.

[Charlie Kirk]

And so if you guys want, if you want to get involved. Shane, it's tpaction.com 100, part of our Commit 100 program. We don't feel as if there's enough national attention right now on this Wisconsin Supreme Court seat. That's why I'm going there. Next Monday, we're bringing Donald Trump Jr. Alongside. We're doing the whole program. This could swing the House of Representatives. And Wisconsin is critical. It is necessary for the future of our country to keep Wisconsin in contention if we lose. So, Shane. Yes.

[Andrew]

I just want to drive home how much turnout matters. If you had John McCain lost Wisconsin by 14 points in 2008 and if you had his number of votes in that Supreme Court race, you would win by like 20 points. That's how much turnout matters. Smaller population, way smaller turnout. Just. It is entirely a turnout race.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you, Shane. Appreciate it. Next. Next member, actually. Yeah, Shane, go ahead.

[Andrew]

I didn't even get to the actual question. I didn't know you were going to go off on such a tangent on this. I'm sorry. I apologize for it being so important. My actual question was regarding the prison systems and spending. Like prisoners, they get treated like hotel guests. I mean, they, they get all of these freedoms, they get privileges, they get PlayStations, they get TVs, they get, you know, snacks and stuff. And, you know, meanwhile, payers are paying for all of this or the families of the, the inmates are paying for all of this. I mean, like, go. I mean, I I did a little bit of research and like there's a organization called Prison Policy Initiative. They estimate that in 2023 there was $182 billion spent on prisons. And like I just wondered if this is something you think DOGE would be a good, you know, target for Blake really quick. Most prisons are state funded. Like the vast majority of. There is a federal bureau, there's federal stuff, but it's mostly state. You'd want to look at what your state does. I don't know the biggest drivers of cost increase. It's just everything costs more money than it used to.

[Charlie Kirk]

I do think you make an astute point. We'll talk about after the break where Sam Bankman Fried, who's a total fraud and a terrible person, joined the great Tucker Carlson's podcast, was talking about all the amenities he was getting. Are you actually in jail or are you like on a vacation playing Xbox? With the stock market at record highs, are you confident your portfolio can weather the next big downturn? Market corrections are quick and unforgiving, wiping out hard earned gains in an instant. Smart investors know the key to financial security is diversification. That's why Noble Gold Investments makes it easy for for Americans to help hedge market volatility and diversify their investments with gold. Since 2010, central banks have steadily increased their gold reserves. And in 2024, gold prices soared over 25%. Gold is simple. You buy it, you own it, you control it. Over $2 billion in precious metal sales. Noble Gold Investments has helped thousands of investors diversify their portfolios with gold IRAs and physical gold. And now when you open a qualified account, Noble gold will gift you 5 ounce silver America the Beautiful coins as a thank you. Don't wait for the next downturn to catch you off guard. Visit noblegold investments.com today and see how easy it is to incorporate gold into your investment strategy. That is Noble Gold investments.com noblegold investments.com Maggie, thank you for being a member. What's on your mind? How are you? Thanks for supporting us. Good.

[Curtis]

I actually was just going to watch today, but your breaking news at the end of our one immediately brought a question to mind. Do you think the Recent activity at ActBlue is related to USAID funding being cut off to many entities? I know you are a big fan of Breaking Bad.

[Charlie Kirk]

So am I.

[Curtis]

And I always thought Democrats big numbers and fundraising was suspicious because there's a party of entitlements and other than their big big money donors, I couldn't see them getting that many people to make small donations. Well, you remember what they did in Breaking Bad, the money laundering to make it look like random donations were sent in to pay for Walter White's cancer treatment. As soon as you said that story, I thought, oh, my gosh, that could possibly be. ActBlue knows what's coming because their funding's been cut off.

[Charlie Kirk]

It very well could be. I think you are bringing up a very good point. The answer is we don't know. You could be right, that as USAID funding has been put in suspension, there has been a suspicious amount of, like, closures and nonprofits that are second guessing the money is coming from somewhere. The Act Blue. The more sinister accusation against ActBlue is that it's Chinese or Iranian originated. We don't have great evidence of that. There are some on the Hill that say that they've seen intelligence that might suggest that. But there also just could be just good old fashioned criminal activity.

[Andrew]

It could be as old fashioned as just they route so much money through it.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yes.

[Andrew]

Who's to say someone didn't go, okay, I'm gonna make it so 0.1% ends up going into this side thing and no one will notice it. And it's part of our fees. There's a lot of mundane criminal activity that could happen. It could also be more organized criminal activity. It could also be we suspect this is criminal activity and we deliberately keep our system feeble and not able to detect it because then we have, you know, plausible deniability, like, look the other way. Don't think too hard about it. There's so many different levels to it. I do want to push back a little that, frankly, if you've been around liberals enough, it is. I actually talked to a friend of mine at the Daily Caller where they investigated one of those people who had like tons and tons of donations in their name. And they reached him like, do you really donate that many times? And the person said, yep, yep, I do. I watch the news all day. I get so worked up and I, I send them another 20.

[Charlie Kirk]

Of course, some of it is legitimate.

[Andrew]

I mean, so it's, I don't want to say like, oh, it's all fraud. There's a lot of passionate Democrats out there. They care a lot about politics. So much of what you've done is we need to train conservatives to care as much as the enemy does.

[Charlie Kirk]

And I will say lots of room for fraud. The tech, the tech of Act Blue, very, very good. Meaning it's like Amazon.com for giving money. It saves all your payment information. It feels like you're, you know, it's really, the user interface is very friendly. It's not just like, you know, this old loading thing. It's hard to describe if you actually go through the pages of ActBlue. It's very, well, constant. It's one stop shopping.

[Andrew]

It really reflects how in the Obama era, 2008 that they had just a total lockdown on Silicon Valley and they got all the smart 28 year old tech guys come in, let's make them the slickest website, the slickest app and we're finally starting to catch up in that world.

[Charlie Kirk]

And it was so profound that basically every Democrat donor has their payment information saved. So anytime a guy goes on msnbc, these Democrat donors are able to like say, okay, I want to go give 10 bucks to, I don't know, Beto O'Rourke or whatever. Easy done. Elizabeth Warren. It's all saved. It's easy to use. They make it seamless. But I definitely think that there's a lot of suspicion there. Thank you so much, really appreciate it.

[Curtis]

Thank you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Curtis, what is on your mind? Thanks for being a member.

[Blake]

Well, yes, thank you, Charlie. It's really a great honor to be able to speak with you. And I wanted to briefly say I really appreciated your previous interview with Secretary of Ag Burke Rawlings. I'm a lifelong eastern Oregon rancher, beef producer, family operation. And it's so great to have this new administration coming in and, and wanting to hear from the grassroots producers. And that's what I wanted to emphasize and let you and, and whomever else may be able to get our group. We have a group out here that is in the high desert that oftentimes gets ignored. But there's very many natural resource issues that we want to, that we need to get through to the administration, both in the Interior Department and with the Secretary of Ag. And one of the biggest problems that we have as beef producers is the meatpacking cartel that rules the protein production not only in the nation, but worldwide. So my question is we want to combine with the Make America Healthy again and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. S in HHS. We can combine and we just. But the main thing, I guess Mr. Kirk, that I want to get through is that the administration and the undersecretaries must get down here to the grassroots producers. They cannot listen to the national organizations that are supposedly representing agricultural interests because they are, they are all corporately influenced. And so my question to you is how best can we as grassroots producers, possibly through your platform, your connections. We would love to make that connection and have field hearings out here. But more importantly, to get to the administration, Secretary Brook Rawlins, to hear the true family operations, farming operations of what would both benefit our rural communities and food security for America.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you very much. Where are you located?

[Blake]

I'm in eastern Oregon. Yeah, don't count eastern Oregon as the socialist side of Oregon, please.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, you guys should join Idaho. That's a longer term project. That's what we call a project 20, 29 item project 2100 minutes.

[Blake]

We are very envious of Idaho. I think we should create a state of Jefferson, actually with eastern Washington and eastern Oregon. But anyway, go ahead.

[Charlie Kirk]

I love the state of Jefferson. I love that. And self determination and self government. I would be willing to lend a voice to that one day. Just please don't put Pullman there. The college campus. Carve it out. By the way, a producer, Andrew is from a cattle rancher family in northern Nevada and he says you're 100% right. Happy to send this clip to Brooke directly, which is what I will do, which is one of the benefits of being a member. And I do want to compliment you. We use the term grassroots a lot. You actually are grassroots in what you are doing. Not truly are metaphorical. You're actually the grassroots.

[Blake]

Right. We truly are a family operation. And my biggest passion, Charlie, is God has blessed me to be a lifelong rancher and beef producer. But if things don't change, my grandchildren will have no opportunity to provide beef and protein to the country. So that's my passion that drives me. So thank you very much.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, that is an admirable passion. I also, I have someone in the Department of Agriculture that I know that is not Brooke Rollins, that is from Idaho. His name is Todd. He's a rock star that I would be comfortable connecting you with. He's terrific.

[Blake]

Oh, please do. We're looking for any connection that we can get our truthful message to. So I so appreciate it.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, this guy's Todd. He's a rock star. And he actually owns. He owns something. He might. I don't know. We'll connect you. Thanks. I really appreciate it. Thanks so much.

[Blake]

Thank you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, Daisy, let's make sure we follow up on that and we get him connected. See, the government that works for the people. All right, who's next? What we got here? Stan. Stan, thank you for being a member. What's on your mind?

[Blake]

Charlie, Nice to talk to you.

[Charlie Kirk]

How are you? Good, how are you?

[Blake]

I'm fine. I was living Dallas, Texas. I was looking for one of Your chapters online a few months ago and couldn't find one in Dallas, and I saw there was one in Rockwall with a small amount of, looks like to me, some young kids. And I can help be the voice of reason if I have the opportunity to find some chapter that they would benefit from my. My experience and knowledge.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, thank you, sir. I actually will be in Dallas tomorrow, so you should come by the event. Actually would love to see you as a member. We can get you all accommodated. Speaking at a. Let me see. Where am I at here tomorrow, Mikey? Let me see here. I want to make sure I get these details right. Hold on one second. You said you're obviously Dallas, Texas, so let me see what I got here. Yes. Okay. I will be in Plano at the Renaissance Dallas at the Plano Legacy West Hotel speaking at a pro life event tomorrow evening. So if that is your deal, we'd love to have you come by and we can get you a ticket. I'll be there. Great. Okay, Daisy, get them connected. And you see, that's the benefit of being a member. We always look out for our members. Daisy will reach out. And Daisy, that is her hometown. So thank you, sir. We'd love to have you. And also we can connect you with some local young patriots. And yes, it's a Nick Vujicic, Kevin Freeman, and also a General Mike. Lieutenant General Mike Flynn event. Great. It's a pro life fintech event from Dallas, Texas. Don't worry, I'm speaking once the sun sets down. Once Shabbat ends. I know all of you keeping score. Okay, what do we have here?

[Blake]

Thank you so much.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you. And we have a ton of chapters in Dallas. We have a ton. Okay, Ted, Ted, thanks for being a member. What's on your mind? Hey, Charlie calling from Vancouver Island, British.

[Andrew]

Columbia, and have a question for you on obviously the border situation and the tariffs. Do you think that Trump would be open to ending the tariffs if we in Canada had an actual leader willing to talk seriously about the border issues?

[Charlie Kirk]

Or is this now more about him.

[Andrew]

Seeking to weaken our economy, bring us.

[Scott]

Along as the 51st state?

[Charlie Kirk]

Where do you stand on mitigating this? First of all, I do not want you guys as the 51st state. Way too many libs, but you seem great. But as far as his strategy, I can't read his mind, and I've never heard him say this in private or public, but I actually think he would be happy with the same treatment of a free trade agreement with some of our allies. I actually think what bothers him the most is that we get tariffed and we do not have reciprocal tariffs against us. And I think that should be the goal, especially with Canada or Mexico. Now, when it comes to our adversaries like China, I think we should tariff across the board. But, yes, tariffs can have a cost to them. However, certain tariffs for certain industries, we might have to joust a little bit with the Canadians when it comes to certain, like, 95% of our fertilizer comes from Canada. Probably not smart to tariff that. Blake, where do you stand on this?

[Andrew]

Yeah, I don't know entirely what his agenda is, and I think it would be helpful if he was more public with it. But I think it's not really Trump's way to just overtly tip exactly what he's going for. There's always some, you know, the, the weave. There's a game. What was he going on going for with North Korea, what's he going for with Russia? It's always a little bit beneath the surface, I think. I think he'd probably play ball more if there was a better government than Justin Trudeau. But I've also entertained the possibility he may like Justin Trudeau as, like, a foe that he can spar with, and he'll. He'll maybe miss him once he's gone. I. I guess I don't want to jump to conclusions about what his intent is because I'm not entirely sure. So I don't want to speak for him.

[Charlie Kirk]

I will say the only part of Canada that will willingly accept is Alberta.

[Andrew]

So you got to be careful with that. Remember, they have first passed the post, so I don't. So when they hold an election, there's like four major parties in Canada, I guess, like kind of three at the national level. And it's just whoever gets the most votes gets the seat in their parliament. So what I'm saying is I'm not sure if we suddenly shifted them to just Republicans and Democrats. I kind of think Alberta would still be a blue state.

[Charlie Kirk]

You do?

[Andrew]

Yeah.

[Charlie Kirk]

Really?

[Andrew]

My gut feeling.

[Charlie Kirk]

I've changed my opinion. They can keep it. They can keep it. All right. Will. Will, thanks for being a member. What's on your mind, members.charlie kirk.com.

[Andrew]

Hey, Charlie. So I know with confirmations coming to.

[Charlie Kirk]

Kind of wrapping up, the next thing is going to be moving legislation. Of course, that's going to bring up whether we should nuke the filibuster. It seems like both parties have folks wanting to do that. I'm not to the point yet, but I do think that there Might be some things that they could change in.

[Andrew]

The Senate rules to hopefully get legislation passed like I believe now, which you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Got to have 3/5 of members for.

[Andrew]

Cloture if they were to make it.

[Charlie Kirk]

3/5 of members present. So everybody would actually have to stay on the floor, stay in town, couldn't go out to eat with lobbyists. Is that anything like that being discussed that you're aware of? Yes. So I will say I actually am in favor of keeping the filibuster for major spending bills that are non reconciliation. I know that some people are going to disagree with that, but I think the filibuster prevented some of the most sinister stuff of Joe Biden from being passed in the first in Biden's term. So I just want to make sure everyone. I actually am a pro filibuster guy in that sense, with that. That being said, of course, we will be out of again, we'll be out of power again sometime in the future, hopefully a long way off. And the filibuster is a guarantee or to slow down the process and to make sure that crazy ideas like adding DC And Puerto Rico in states can't just happen with a 50 person vote. Imagine if we got rid of the filibuster and we lost in the future, which is totally conceivable because I know everyone says, oh, you know, we're never, we're never gonna be beat. No, no, no, hold on. Things go in cycles. They go back and forth. Imagine the Democrats with a Democrat president could be like, okay, D.C. is a state, Puerto Rico's a state. And we're gonna be looking back like, well, we got rid of the filibuster for what exactly? But getting rid of the filibuster for a reconciliation bill, fine. That's a very specific thing. The Democrats start that precedent. We cannot predict how radical the Democrats are gonna be when that time comes. Not if there will be a moment in our lifetime when we no longer control the U.S. senate. We literally just got back control. I hope that never happens. You have to plan for that. Blake, what is your thoughts?

[Andrew]

Yeah, so what's funny with the filibuster is, as I've mentioned to you before, the filibuster is fake. Like, the filibuster could be eliminated at any time. And it's maintained because both parties in the Senate have an interest in just not voting on things that they nominally support. So, you know, with Mitch McConnell, it was, oh, we can use the filibuster as an excuse to not do border stuff. With Democrats, it's, you know, Joe Biden doesn't necessarily want to pack the Supreme Court because he thinks they'll get blown up. It's a thing that protects the majority party from votes it does not want to take. But it is still true, as you say, that if you get rid of it, it is the Pandora's box. And I think what's especially important to emphasize is whoever takes the first move on abolishing the filibuster won't get as much out of it as the second party to take office afterwards.

[Charlie Kirk]

I also just want to say that there has been a decade long erosion of the filibuster. It actually started with Harry Reid, if you might remember. Harry Reid, of all people, started the erosion of the filibuster for district, circuit and district court judges. And then it marched forward when then we used the abolition of the filibuster to put Neil Gorsuch on the supreme court back in 2017, then also with Brett Kavanaugh, then also with Amy Coney Barrett. And so we've seen the slow erosion of filibuster. I think we've eroded it enough. Look, it would be very tempting right now because we control the House and the Senate. Get rid of the filibuster, simple up or down vote. I think that would be a mistake. I think it would be a tragedy.

[Andrew]

If you were going to do it, I would say you should do it immediately after an election to get the vote the most out of it.

[Charlie Kirk]

Yeah, but then the Democrats will do it to us.

[Andrew]

They will. But if you're going to do it, you'd want to get the most out of it. You don't want to do it right before an election and then you lose power and they get the.

[Charlie Kirk]

And by the way, it's not just a matter of doing it. I don't think the Senate would put up with it. So, like there's, it's not even a realistic thing right now. Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here. Brand new year, brand new opportunities to change the world for the better. It's easier than you might think. You can save babies by providing ultrasounds with preborn. Together with the Sanctity of Human Life Month, we're going to save 35,000 babies to show the world that not only do we believe life is precious, but we're going to do something about it. Your gift of preborn will give a girl the truth about what's happening in her body so that she can make the right choice. What better way to start this new year than to Join us to save babies. And $28 a month will save a baby a month all year long. A $15,000 gift will provide a complete ultrasound machine that will save thousands of babies for years and years to come and will also save moms from a lifetime of pain and regret. I am a donor to this organization, and you should be, too. Start this new year by being a hero for life. Call 833-850-2229 or click on the preborn banner at charliekirk.com that is charliekirk.com and click on the preborn banner. I'm a donor. You should be, too. CharlieKirk.com preborn banner. Okay, members.charliekirk.com, we have to go fast. Carol, what's on your mind? Thanks for being a member, Charlie.

[Curtis]

I saw, you know, the bits and pieces with Governor Newsom. It was brilliant.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thank you.

[Curtis]

But I was just so intrigued by your statement about. Well, don't you think, first of all, you gave a definition for politics that I don't think a lot of people really understand that, unfortunately. So that was really cool. And then you were just talking about Trump and blending with media. They can't catch up. I don't, you know, so I just wanted you to talk about that more.

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, thank you. That's great feedback. Yeah, I mean, I had to educate Governor Newsom on what politics was. Politics is the highest form of community because it blends morality and sociability. That's not a Charlie Kirk quote. That is an Aristotle quote from the politics, because he was like, well, who's gonna make these decisions? And I said, well, that's what politics is. It is the decision of community, morality, and sociability. And I thought I actually did quite well on the book banning segment because that's supposed to be his strongest little talking point. And I think it came apart. Thank you, Carol, for mentioning that. I encourage everyone to check out my conversation with Gavin Newsom. Carol, overall, did you think it was a good idea very quickly for me to speak with Governor Newsom?

[Curtis]

Yes, I sure did. That's. He's trying to figure out what, how this has all happened. They're lost. He's trying to figure it out. And so you're, you're kind of exposing where they're at and the whole thing. And you're just so honest. I mean, you were telling him, and so he had to answer. And look what, look what happened. So you're actually, by doing that interview, you started some conflict within Democrats.

[Charlie Kirk]

You're smart, and it's a conversation that.

[Curtis]

They need to have.

[Charlie Kirk]

I'm sorry we had to cut off. Carol. Carol, if you're listening, I apologize. Carol, you're a very sweet person. I'll send you a signed hat as an apology. So sorry about that. Okay, let's get to the next question here. Elizabeth. Elizabeth, thanks for being a member. What's on your mind?

[Curtis]

Yes. Hi, Charlie. How are you today?

[Charlie Kirk]

How are you?

[Curtis]

All right, Actually, I'm very upset because, long story short, my father died in a nursing home during COVID in April of 2020. And when it first happened, we assumed that, like everyone else, oh, a nurse had gotten Covid. And it spread throughout. We didn't find out until months later that Andrew Cuomo literally and deliberately put COVID positive patients into nursing homes. And I want people to understand. Every single person who had a family member in a nursing home got a phone call on March 9 saying, we are shutting down the nursing homes for their safety, and you cannot come see your family. So they locked me out because I may or may not have Covid. And then 15 days later, they deliberately put COVID positive patients in the nursing homes. He was told, if you do this, thousands of people will die. How is this man still politically viable and running for the mayor of New York City?

[Charlie Kirk]

Well, largely because the Democrats, almost nobody else. And the Democrat Party is not a party, it is a machine. And you plug in place pieces. And they've looked at their roster and they're like, well, why'd we get rid of this Cuomo guy again?

[Andrew]

Cuomo is a lot like Gavin, actually, in that. He's very. He's a canny political.

[Charlie Kirk]

Very similar. Yes.

[Andrew]

He got pushed. They did. They get. They got him out on MeToo, right? Yeah. And so they got him out on.

[Curtis]

Me, too, instead of the mass murder, because Murphy, Governor Murphy and Governor Wolf in Pennsylvania both did the exact same thing he did. But if they got Cuomo out on it, they would have had to take it out. The other governors on this, so did Whitmer up in Michigan. So, like, four governors did this. No one's being held accountable. There was an investigation by the Department of Justice under the Trump administration. When Biden came back, came in, unfortunately, the first thing they did was they squashed that investigation. And I don't know if. Are they going to start that up again?

[Charlie Kirk]

That's a good question. I don't know.

[Curtis]

State was 15,300 people. It was like 9,000 people in New Jersey and 8,000 people in Pennsylvania. And Rachel Levine, whatever, her first real Name is. She also did the same order in Pennsylvania for Governor Wolf. She pulled her mother out of the nursing home the day before that order was gonna take place.

[Charlie Kirk]

And we don't have a ton of time. I wanna say you're not alone. And you know who else is like a dog with a bone on this Janice Dean. Janice Dean is the Fox News weather woman. And both of her parents died because of Cuomo's mismanagement of the nursing homes. I would love to see that criminal investigation relaunched. I'm very sorry for your loss. God bless you. We gotta move to the next question. Thank you, though. Thank you.

[Curtis]

Thank you, Charlie.

[Charlie Kirk]

Okay, I wanna read this last one. Okay. Hey, Charlie. I can't unmute for some reason. With the transparency of this administration. Where are the JFK and MLK Jr files? And will we hear anything about the 2017 Vegas shooting? I never asked you what is your thought on the Vegas shooting?

[Andrew]

I am mostly not on the on board with the Vegas theories.

[Charlie Kirk]

Just the questions.

[Andrew]

I just. I think people. People have a bias to demand like big causes for things. And so I remember bizarre. When I was with. When I was with Tucker.

[Charlie Kirk]

I know, that's why I'm asking.

[Andrew]

Yeah. When I was with Tucker, we had a guy who. He was saying. I think he was on the National Security Council and he was trying to say, like, we have evidence that it was a joint ISIS antifa operation. And to be honest, when I heard that, I'm like, oh, this person is crazy. And I think the boring answer is, like, people. Some guy had like ennui because he's this like fading boomer who was like a professional gambler. And like, he decided to go out in this spectacular way. And people, they had to be more than that. They had to find a better motive than this guy. It was just like a horrible psycho who decided to kill a ton of people. And it does go against our usual things. It was an older guy than most shooters. Usually they're young. But I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility that just a lunatic would decide to gun down a lot of people. And I think what stands out is if someone else did it, it's just. Why, like.

[Charlie Kirk]

No, I'm not even. I just. I not shocked at your opinion. And it's persuasive. There is a lot of witness testament as but official narrative. Thank you for all you do. I think though, at least we agree. Release all the files.

[Andrew]

Yeah, release every file we have. Of course.

[Charlie Kirk]

I am privately and publicly. My advice to the administration is. I'm very consistent. Guys, you guys got to start putting these files out. We need Epstein, we need jfk, we need mlk, we need Malcolm X, Vegas shooting. Just do a website, put them all up. No redaction.

[Andrew]

Any document from a year that's go. Any document from a year that starts with 1:9 should just be public.

[Charlie Kirk]

All of it, just like, no more hiding. Like, let's just get them up. That's my own personal opinion. I know they're working on that, but I think the American people voted for it and that's what they deserve. And that's also what the president has demanded. By the way, Blake, thank you. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us as always, [e-mail] thanks so much for listening and God bless.

[Andrew]

For more on many of these stories and news you can Trust, go to charliekirk.com.