Can I Change Rand Paul's Mind on the BBB?

Summary

The Charlie Kirk Show: Can I Change Rand Paul's Mind on the BBB? Release Date: June 11, 2025

In this compelling episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, host Charlie Kirk engages in a critical conversation with Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, delving into the intricacies of the much-debated "big beautiful bill" (BBB). The discussion navigates through fiscal responsibility, national debt, border security, and defense spending, offering listeners an in-depth analysis from two prominent conservative voices.

---

1. The Big Beautiful Bill: Support and Concerns

Charlie Kirk initiates the conversation by seeking Senator Rand Paul's perspective on the BBB, highlighting the importance of obtaining his support for the bill. Senator Rand Paul expresses a nuanced stance:

• Support for Tax Cuts: Paul underscores his endorsement of the bill’s tax cuts, referencing his 2017 vote and advocating for their permanence. He states, “I support the tax cuts as is. I support adding to the tax cuts as President Trump wishes” (02:42).

• Spending Cuts and Deficit Concerns: While acknowledging some spending cuts as beneficial, Paul raises concerns about the bill’s impact on the national deficit. He critiques the inclusion of $5 trillion in debt ceiling increases, emphasizing the long-term fiscal implications. “I can’t vote to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion,” he asserts (02:42).

---

2. The Debt Ceiling Debate

A significant portion of the dialogue centers around the controversial issue of the debt ceiling. Senator Paul articulates his opposition to a substantial increase, arguing that it undermines the GOP’s moral standing:

• Opposition to $5 Trillion Increase: Paul explains that such a massive raise would erode the Republican narrative against Democratic spending, stating, “It’s not Republicans if the deficit now is completely owned by Republicans” (06:15).

• Proposed Amendment: To mitigate this, Paul proposes an amendment limiting the debt ceiling increase to three months’ worth of borrowing (approximately $500 billion), aiming to prompt immediate fiscal responsibility (07:12).

• Political Strategy: He warns that accepting a large debt ceiling increase would strip Republicans of leverage, allowing Democrats to dominate fiscal policy. “We lose the power of the argument in our moral standing,” Paul warns (09:35).

---

3. Balancing Fiscal Conservatism with National Security

The discussion transitions to balancing fiscal conservatism with pressing national security issues, particularly immigration and border security.

• Immigration Crisis: Paul acknowledges the severity of the immigration situation under President Biden, advocating for stronger border security measures. He critiques the proposed $46.5 billion for border fencing, questioning its efficiency: “They want to build a wall between us and Canada, too?” (11:24).

• Defense Spending: Highlighting concerns over escalating military budgets, Paul criticizes the bill’s allocation for defense, suggesting it caters to the military-industrial complex without sufficient justification (13:49).

---

4. On-the-Ground Reporting: Unveiling the Truth in Los Angeles

Transitioning from legislative discussions, Charlie introduces two insightful guests, reporters Kaylin Delameda and Anthony Cabasa, who provide firsthand accounts of recent protests in Los Angeles.

• Maxine Waters’ Claims vs. Ground Reality: Waters claims minimal violence during the protests, but Delameda and Cabasa present a contrasting narrative of widespread, intentional chaos. Delameda states, “These are not a few incidents. It's widespread and it's completely intentional” (21:03).

• Organized Violence: Cabasa reveals evidence of organized aggression, including strategically placed bricks and support from local unions and activist groups. He details, “There's a pallet of bricks conveniently located… protesters were able to make their way into it” (22:48).

• Role of National Guard: Both reporters clarify the National Guard's limited role, countering claims that their presence incites violence. They emphasize that their deployment is strictly for protecting federal buildings, not engaging with protesters (26:32).

---

5. The Importance of Independent Journalism

Charlie underscores the significance of independent journalists like Delameda and Cabasa in uncovering truths that mainstream media might overlook or distort. He remarks, “If we do not have Frontlines, we don't have Anthony. We would not have the stories here” (35:43).

• Personal Risks: The reporters highlight the dangers they face, from tear gas to physical confrontations, portraying their commitment to documenting events accurately. Cabasa shares his experiences of being tear-gassed and emphasizes the critical role of independent media in upholding truth and accountability.

---

Conclusion

This episode of The Charlie Kirk Show offers a robust exploration of the BBB, fiscal policies, and national security challenges, complemented by on-the-ground reporting that challenges mainstream narratives. Through incisive dialogue and firsthand accounts, Charlie Kirk and his guests provide listeners with a comprehensive understanding of the pressing issues facing America today.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Rand Paul on Tax Cuts: “I support the tax cuts as is. I support adding to the tax cuts as President Trump wishes.” (02:42)

• Rand Paul on Debt Ceiling: “I can’t vote to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion.” (02:42)

• Rand Paul on Fiscal Responsibility: “It’s not Republicans if the deficit now is completely owned by Republicans.” (09:35)

• Kaylin Delameda on Protest Violence: “These are not a few incidents. It's widespread and it's completely intentional.” (21:03)

• Anthony Cabasa on Organized Aggression: “There's a pallet of bricks conveniently located… protesters were able to make their way into it.” (22:48)

---

This detailed summary captures the essence of the episode, highlighting key discussions and insights while providing context for listeners unfamiliar with the full conversation.

Transcript

[Charlie Kirk]

Hey, everybody. Charlie Kirk here live from the Bitcoin.com studio. Senator Rand Paul joins us. Can we change his mind and get Rand Paul to vote yes on the big beautiful bill? I try my best and you'll see what happens. I think we get him very close. You guys be the judge. We then have Kaylin Delameda and Anthony Cabasa, two great patriots right up on the front lines of doing the most important work in the country when it comes to reporting and, and journalism. You're going to love it. Email us. As always, freedomarliekirk.com subscribe to our podcast. That is the Charlie Kirk show podcast page. And as always, you guys can become a member today. Members.charliekirk.com that is members.charliekirk dot com when you guys become a member. Members.charliekink.com you could join our program. We deeply appreciate it. Members.charliekarts.com and listen to all of our episodes. Advertiser free. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go.

[Rand Paul]

Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.

[Anthony Cabasa]

I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

[Rand Paul]

Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point usa.

[Charlie Kirk]

We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble gold [e-mail] that is noblegoldinvestments.com it's where I buy all of my gold. Go to noblegoldinvestments.com joining us now is an old friend and a great patriot. We might not agree on everything, but boy, he is incredibly principled. And for that I deeply admire him. It is Senator Rand Paul from the great state of Kentucky. Senator, great to see you today. Thank you for the time.

[Rand Paul]

Hey, Charlie, thanks for having me.

[Charlie Kirk]

So, Senator, the news of the day is that in some ways you found yourself on the other side of this big, beautiful bill from the White House. You know, I've heard a lot of the feedback from yourself and from Senator Ron Johnson, and I totally agree that we need to get closer to a balanced budget and just this addiction to spending Must end simultaneously. There's some really good points that were made by the White House. We had a long conversation with Stephen Miller. I wanted to give you a fair amount of time to make your case. Where do you currently stand on the big beautiful bill and what would potentially get you to a yes?

[Rand Paul]

You know, I support quite a bit of what's in the bill. The tax cuts is the primary aspect of the bill. I voted for them in 2017. I support making them permanent. I accept the argument that if you lower tax rates, sometimes you get more revenue. This is what Art Laffer argued in the 1980s and still argues. So I'm fine with the tax cut as is. I'm fine with adding to the tax cuts as President Trump wishes. So I'm fine with that aspect of the bill. And that's a big bulk of the bill that will lead to growth. It's what led to low unemployment rates in the first administration and really was a great boon to our country. The second part of it, there are some spending cuts. I think many of these spending cuts are good. I think a lot of them are in the outlying years and may or may not happen. Some of them are fake, such as forgiving the student loan forgiveness program or ending the student loan forgiveness program, which the courts have already ended. So it's, it's sort of saying, oh, we're going to save money by something Biden was going to do, but the courts have said he couldn't do. It's not a real savings. We know that the bill will add probably even if you say the taxes don't add to the debt, which I accept the bill in the first years has $400 billion worth of new spending on border and also on military. So we know in the first couple of years there will be an addition to the deficit. It may be made up in the later years, but that is yet to be determined. But none of that really is my objection to the bill. Those are minor things. And I actually could vote for it as is, even as imperfect as it is, I could vote for it, but I can't vote to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion. And the reason is this. The debt this year is going to be over 2 trillion, 2.2 trillion. And people say, oh, that's Biden's fault. Well, it was Biden's fault until March of this year when the Republicans, not me, but most of the Republicans, voted to continue the Biden spending levels in a continuing resolution in March of 2025. That's what we live under now. Are the GOP spending levels, minus me and a few others. So that year ends at the end of September. The debt will be 2.2 trillion this year. That's all on the Republicans. If Republicans also vote to extend the debt ceiling by 5 trillion, then really we lose the power of the argument in our moral standing and saying this is a bunch of Democrat problems and Democrats are deficit in spend, big spenders. It's not Republicans if the deficit now is completely owned by Republicans. So I've offered the opposite. I have said that rather than give Congress, which is reckless with spending and has no good history other than adding $36 trillion to the debt, don't give them a debt ceiling that lasts two years. Don't give them $5 trillion worth because they will spend it and they will borrow it. Give them three months worth. So I've offered this as an amendment and I would accept it and vote for it if it were part of the bill. Three months is an extraordinary amount, though. $500 billion. And you say, well, it's inconvenient to keep voting on it. Well, yeah, it's also inconvenient to borrow $36 trillion and have a trillion dollars in interest. So I'd make them address the issue. So in three months, let's say we gave them three months worth of borrowing potential. 500 billion. It expire about the end of September. What comes at the end of September? Another big, beautiful bill to fund the government. It's going to be an omnibus or a continuing resolution. It'll be all the bills crammed together. It's a terrible way to run government. But then we would ask them at that point, all right, you promised us you were going to do better. And once again, this isn't an accusation against the President. This is an accusation against GOP leadership on both sides of the. I'm saying I don't believe them or trust them. So in three months, we'd get another bite at the apple and we'd say, all right, what have you done? And they would say, oh, we're going to do it next time. And that's what they say right now from Speaker Johnson, we hear he's going to be conservative after the 2026 elections. The Senate has made it not just 4 trillion in borrowing, they want to do 5 trillion in borrowing. And they've explicitly told us it's to get through the 2026 elections without talking about the debt. All of these things were conservatives would oppose. But now they, because they support the president so much, they're willing to look the other way. I like the President. I like him personally. I was his biggest defender against two impeachments. We'll do it again. I've supported his nominees, but I'm just not going to go against all principle to support 5 trillion in borrowing because I don't know who we would be or where we would be of a movement if nobody opposes this.

[Charlie Kirk]

So part of the problem, and I agree with a lot of what you said, Senator, is that the counter argument is that we don't have the votes in the House or the Senate to do this. The moderates will not play ball with any dramatic spending adjustments and we have to play with a very slim majority. I imagine your counter argument is that, hey, maybe it's time for those of us that are fiscal conservatives start wielding the same power that these moderates wield. What would your reply be to the fact that it might not be possible in this reconciliation bill to get some of the demands that you are articulating?

[Rand Paul]

Right. And I'm not looking for hundreds or dozens of demands. I'm looking for one. Separate out the debt ceiling and put it in a different bill and I can vote for this. It's still unknown whether there are enough of us. I think the counting and the tally depends on who has the courage to say no. If there are four conservatives in the House or four conservatives in the Senate who would say no to the debt ceiling, it would be taken off in a heartbeat. They would just negotiate. They're not negotiating because it's mostly me at this point. Now, Ron Johnson has expressed some of the same concern on the spending and maybe a little bit on the debt ceiling as well, but there aren't four at this point. So they will not negotiate. In fact, they've, they've chosen really to go full bore campaign mode against me. So they aren't really caring at all about whether or not I ever cooperate with the White House again because they've chosen to smear and lie about me throughout all the social media outlets by paying these influencers to attack me. But I don't think, you know, if they know me at all. They apparently have not have misjudged me. To think that somehow spreading lies about me and pillaring me will somehow cause me to be chastened and, you know, lick the boot. So I'm not going to do that. And I think what you'll find is, is that over time, people are gonna discover that the debt keeps going. The debt is gonna go on and on and it's gonna get Worse. And there's gonna be a crisis in this country. And there needs to be a remnant of conservatives who actually still are fiscally conservative and can argue from that position.

[Charlie Kirk]

So the argument against the debt, and correct me if I'm wrong, Senator, is that if we peel out the debt ceiling, then potentially it would need 60 votes as a standalone vote and it would give a lot more power to Chuck Schumer to. Then we'd have other concessions and other liberal boondoggle wishes or aims. Is that true?

[Rand Paul]

There's no history of Democrats ever voting against a debt ceiling. They always vote for the debt ceiling. They love and enjoy debt. The modern monetary theory they talk so much about is just spend, spend, spend. They know it has to go up. Many of them. Elizabeth Warren agrees with President Trump. She'd like to have no debt ceiling, but she will always vote to raise it. And so if you put a bill on the floor and you said this is it, it's either this or default. Are you going to vote to raise the debt soon? They all will. And they'll vote for any amount, too. They'll vote for 10 trillion if they want to do 10 trillion and we can go through the whole term, the whole next term of President Trump and never have to borrow again. Democrats will all vote for that. And people say, oh no, they don't like Donald Trump. They won't do it. Well, they voted to raise the debt ceiling in his first term. And historically the debt ceiling has gone up, I don't know, maybe 100 times in the last, maybe not 100, let's say 50 times in the last 30 years. Each time it's gone up, it's been all the Democrats vote for it every time. And it's been the big government Republicans. But to me, raising the debt ceiling is a day of shame. And they walk down to the front of the floor of the Senate or to the well of the House and they have to admit that they are the big spenders. So the big spenders on the Republican side always vote to raise the debt ceiling and the Democrats. But now you're going to change the dynamic where it's going to be all Republicans voting for raise the debt ceiling. And what you'll wind up with is no Republicans left who can argue with a straight face that it's the Democrats fault because they will own the debt. From now on, the Republicans will own the debt and have no argument against Democrats being the big spenders because they will own the debt. I think it's a, it's a, it's it's more worrisome than people can imagine unless they've really thought this through.

[Charlie Kirk]

So a couple minutes remaining here, Senator, and I agree, I believe the national debt is a crisis to our country. Would you agree that the invasion under Joe Biden, the immigration we've seen, is also a national crisis facing America?

[Rand Paul]

Yep.

[Charlie Kirk]

And so. And so where would you rank that and balance that between this big, beautiful bill and the fiscal consensus?

[Rand Paul]

I think you can do both. So I'm against the 8 million people or so that Biden letting come in the country. I'm against open borders. I think we should do more than we have been doing. But I can't just quit being a fiscal conservative because you said, well, the border needs more security. It does. So I'll give you a very specific example. They said to us, we want to fence the remaining thousand miles of the southern border. President Trump and others have fenced about, you know, probably 700 miles or so. So there's about 1200 left. A lot of it's mountains, so you might be able to fence a thousand more. The Border Patrol website says it costs $6.5 million per mile. You multiply that by a thousand and you get 6.5 billion. Well, the bill is asking for 46.5 billion. So what are they going to do, build a wall between us and Canada, too? I mean, you ought to at least have to justify your numbers. There's been no justification. Everybody says, you're not the president. Be quiet. We didn't elect you. All this crazy stuff on the Internet and it's like, well, somebody shouldn't push back and do the math and say, well, it doesn't add up. You want 46 billion, and we're getting 6.5 billion on this thing. And so, yeah, we should do the math on this. They want to hire 8,000 new agents. I'm saying hire 4,000 new agents. I'm saying, let's get started. And not have a permanent army of people sitting around. The border's been largely controlled by the president by sheer willpower, and I give him all the credit. He came in and by sheer willpower and various threats and bullying of other countries, he's controlled the border. It shows that it could have been done under Biden and he never did it. But now that it's controlled, shouldn't we at least think about the cost and not say, oh, we're conservative except for when it comes to the border, when we're for unlimited spending? Same with the military. The military has been evading its caps for a long time. It went up 3% last year. They added some more on. Now they want to have 150 billion on. The untold story of this bill is this big beautiful bill is a secret plot by Lindsey Graham and others to explode the military caps. They just want more military money. They want more tanks. They want more play. They want everything to please the military industrial complex. And I think this is the untold story of this bill.

[Charlie Kirk]

Senator, thank you for your time. I wish we had more time to go through this. We might not agree. I want the big beautiful bill to pass largely because I agree with everything you say. But. But I believe we're in the midst of a national immigration crisis and we need mass deportations. And I think it gets that 80% quotient. And so, Senator, my hope is that we can figure out this debt ceiling objection that you have because we'd love to have your vote. Because also remember, it does defund Planned Parenthood, which you and I both have cared about for quite some time. A lifelong.

[Rand Paul]

And I'm with you. I'm with you. I'm for voting for the bill. I've told him I will vote for the bill, separate out the debt ceiling so I don't have to give up all of my principles.

[Charlie Kirk]

And.

[Rand Paul]

And I'll vote for the bill.

[Charlie Kirk]

Senator, thank you so much. Appreciate your time. Thank you.

[Rand Paul]

Thank you.

[Charlie Kirk]

Private student loan debt in America totals about $300 billion. About 45 billion of that is labeled as distressed. Why refi refinances distressed or defaulted private student loans that others will not touch. Why refi doesn't care what your credit score is. You can finally take control of your student loan situation with a plan that works for your monthly budget. Go to why refi.com do you have a co borrower? Why refi can get them released from the loan? You guys have got to check it out right [e-mail] that is yrefi.com so check it out right now. That's yrefi.com, call 888 yrefi34 or log on to yrefi.com may not be available in all 50 states. Do you have a co borrower? Well, why refi can check help you guys out. Private student loan debt in America totals $300 billion. Go to yrefi.com that is whyrefi.com may not be available in all 50 states. Go to yrefy.com so I agree with a lot of Rand Paul sentiment, without a doubt. But you Must deal with the majority that you have and that is a three seat House majority. Now again, I didn't want to turn this into a debate at all because you heard in his interview he was receiving enough antagonism. That's not going to bring him towards a yes. So we wanted to have a good conversation. Nor do I think he deserves or should be a recipient of antagonism. Are you kidding me? He's been amazing on foreign wars and the Afghanistan stuff and the boondoggles and he's been amazing on anti IRS stuff and Fauci. I mean, let's just be honest about it. We got enough enemies. Blessed are the peacemakers. One of my favorite verses, blessed are the peacemakers. I don't think we as Christians are peacemakers nearly enough. But. But let me respond to something now that I think is important. If Rand Paul got his way and we isolated the debt ceiling in its own vote, let's not fool ourselves. Chuck Schumer will absolutely extract his pound of flesh because you will then need to get to 60 votes. So basically this is an opportunity to raise the debt ceiling via a 50 vote threshold so that we get zero Democrat concessions. Instead, let's say that we don't raise the debt ceiling as part of this reconciliation bill and then we go towards another government shutdown. Chuck Schumer will say, this is going to be a republic. This is a Trump shutdown. This is a Trump shutdown. That's what he'll say. And then he'll say, John Thune and Speaker Johnson, here's 15 things that I need and he'll probably get seven of them. And they'll be like transgender stuff and green energy stuff and foreign aid and the reconstitution of usaid. And it will neuter so much of our leverage. Basically what this will do with the reconciliation bill is this will prevent Chuck Schumer from having any legislative wins this entire Congress. Let me say that again. This will deprive Chuck Schumer and the Democrats from having any leverage this entire Congress. So while I agree with Rand Paul on principle, we shouldn't be raising the debt ceiling. It should be a day of shame, legit respect, totally get it. What we're talking about here is you'll actually make the Democrat Party stronger. And Rand Paul says, in all due respect to him, he says, well, the Democrats always vote for every debt increase because they vote for every debt increase once they get concessions. Remember, they've been very happy to shut down the government multiple times until they get concessions. And then we Cave Democrats are getting whipped up into a frenzy again. He says they'll never agree to stop raising the debt. Well, it used to be that and that they never agreed to a government shutdown, but they did that in Trump's first term. In fact, we've seen this time and time again. Democrats tend to get more extreme over time. So if you are tired of Democrats getting wins in D.C. then you kind of need to include the debt ceiling in the reconciliation bill. Otherwise you're going to throw it back to a 60 vote threshold. We've seen this whole play before and I want to just repeat one other point here and there's a lot on the border that I do want to respond to which is it's not even worth it. There's a lot. I got 45 seconds. There's a lot here. CBP spends months analyzing the terrain to develop this calculation, which includes motion sentence monitoring systems, video systems, underground electric cables, anti tunnel systems, paving entirely new roads, etc. The border price is high to make sure it gets done. No excuses now. Rand Paul is right though. Out of all the places where I think his objection probably has the greatest spirit is the increase in defense spending. It's interesting how that one has not got a lot of attention. The kind of Pentagon bloat. Separate topic for another time. But the debt ceiling is a very important point because if we went to a 60 vote threshold you would make Chuck Schumer powerful again. And this reconciliation bill makes him weak and powerless and without a victory for multiple years. You ever notice how the power always seems to go out right when you need it most? Whether it's a heat wave, a summer storm or goodness gracious, God forbid, a tornado or hurricane. Just too many people running the AC at once. Our fragile grid cannot keep up. That's why I got the Grid Dr. 3300 solar generator from my Patriot supply. This thing is an absolute beast. 3300 watts of off grid power that keeps my fridge, freezer, lights, even medical devices running whenever grid power fails. And right now they've got a crazy deal going. When you buy the Grid Dr. 3300, they'll throw in two waterproof 200 watt solar panels completely free. These aren't cheap plastic panels either. They're super durable, waterproof and built to last through storms, heat and who knows what else. Shop mypatriotsupply.com Kirk to claim your free panels today. If there was ever a time to get serious about blackout protection, this is it. Mypatriotsupply.com Kirk mypatriotsupply.com Kirk and get yours today. Don't believe what you see. Believe what you are told by the state. That's what Maxine Waters has to say. I want to welcome Kalyn delameda, tpusa frontlines reporter. And also Anthony Cabasa, independent journalist. They were both on the ground in LA doing heroes work. Hello to you both. Let's play the cut from Maxine Waters here. He's just like, it's so incredible. Play cut. 369.

[Maxine Waters]

Don't think that somehow because they called out the National Guard, there was violence. There was no violence. I was on the street. I know. And I went from downtown detention back out into the community, talking to people. What happened in Paramount, what happened in Compton, what happened in Inglewood. So first of all, get it straight and don't just rely on. On what you're being told are the few incidents that you saw.

[Charlie Kirk]

Few incidents that you saw. Kaylin, what is the truth of what you were reporting on, on the lines of front lines in la? Caitlin?

[Kaylin Delameda]

Well, the truth is that these are not a few incidents. It's widespread and it's completely intentional. And that's just the truth of the matter. You can look anywhere around downtown LA and you'll find broken, destroyed windows, businesses looted businesses. They destroyed waymos, they've destroyed countless number of cop cars. We've seen that footage of people throwing cinder blocks and other things at those police cars that were on the freeway, the 101. And this is all very reminiscent of what we saw in 2020. A lot of these people are likely not from Los Angeles, they're likely from elsewhere, but they're opportunists, they're parasitic, and they're here just to cause chaos.

[Charlie Kirk]

So I'm gonna follow up with that in a second. I have a question. So, Anthony, independent journalist Anthony Cabasa does great work. Anthony, what percentage of these people that were doing this were quote, unquote, professional agitators versus just rank and file people participating?

[Anthony Cabasa]

Yeah. Thank you so much for having me, Charlie. So what I've been seeing on the ground, I'm actually in LA proper. And so I've been able to get to these protests since they began on Friday. You know, you have Gavin Newsom that is saying that he's calling in the National Guard. And then you have. And that is why the escalations have escalated now to violence. But that's just simply not the truth. I've been there since day one, which was Friday, and that was a protest against the ice Raids that have been ramping up here in Los Angeles. So you have a lot of these small organizations here locally that put these things together. You had the Black Lives Matter, LA chapter. You have the DS, the PSL, which is a party of socialism and liberation, which is an oxymoron. There's no liberation through socialism. And there's also the dsa, the Democratic Socialists of America. On top of that, you have these teacher unions and the SEIU that are making sure that there's flyers for everybody, making sure that masks are being delivered for everyone. That one has food and water. And. And surprisingly enough, what I have come to find. You know, Maxine Waters wants to talk about how Paramount was without incident. That that is a city next to Compton, California. I actually exclusively posted a video that I found of a pallet of bricks conveniently located to where ICE agents were setting up to. To go out and raid. It was actually a setup for them. It was a staging area for them to go out into multiple cities. But then a local city councilman, a lot of people don't know this, it was a local city councilman that just so happened to be around that location, saw a DHS agent car go inside of the staging area. He put out a video saying, dhs is getting ready to raid this Home Depot because the staging area was set in front of a Home Depot. And that's when people started to come and attack the DHS agents was because of the city council member that made this video saying, guys, you're getting ready. Be ready. You know, make sure you come out here and protest peacefully. But of course, we know that that led to violence.

[Charlie Kirk]

So, Kalin, you've seen a lot of these type of demonstrations. What, if anything, was there, like a command and control type operation? And walk us through some of the more graphic elements of what you witnessed on the ground.

[Kaylin Delameda]

Right. So as far as command and control, I think a lot of that is, I'm speculating, is going to be on any internal comms. But what I've seen since participating in covering these events, such as what we saw in 2020, also a lot of the same formations. You have a lot of the same sort of agitative individuals up front in front of police officers, just continually hurling insults, things that are racist, things that are absolutely disgusting to these law enforcement officers. And then you'll have people sort of behind that that will continually throw things and continually push forward until law enforcement has to start using less lethal, you know, weapons to get these people to back off. But, yeah, there's something more There, that doesn't necessarily appear obvious just to anyone who is just viewing these things for the first time.

[Charlie Kirk]

So, Anthony, what is the truth here of this? There were bricks and rocks and cinder blocks being stored. And do you have a sense that any of this is paid or organized?

[Anthony Cabasa]

Oh, absolutely. You know, to list the small group of organizations, you have the seiu, you have the local teachers union, utla, that's out there funding all of this. You have the psl, Party of Socialism Liberation. You have Black Lives Matter. All these organizations have money, you know, that they fundraise. They're putting out all these links online to help donate to fund fight Back, quote, unquote fascism. You need to help us fight Trump and his fascist gestapo that are descending upon Los Angeles. So that's why you see that it's very well organized. You see it's out there that for some reason there's pallets of bricks conveniently located. I actually discovered two different sites. The first one was kind of dismissed because I discovered the pallet of bricks next to a Home Depot. So there was a lot of people trying to deflect and say, well, of course it's a Home Depot. But if you watch that video that I discovered of the pallets, it's the only pallet with cylinder blocks out there. There is no other pallet out there. There's no pallet of fertilizer, there's no pallet of anything else Home Depot sells. The only pallet that was out and that was used by the protesters was the cylinder blocks that were just conveniently located right in front of the staging area. And then on Saturday night, I also went and discovered that there was bricks right next to downtown la. And this was just a random. That's the video you're showing right now. This was on a corner, tucked in, hidden from a plain view. But somehow protesters were able to make their way into it. So what we're seeing here, right, kind of going back to what I, what I had said was that Gavin Newsom and LA City Mayor Bass are trying to blame this and shift the blame to Republicans and Donald Trump escalating the situation by National Guard. But it was actually two full days of attacks on law enforcement, DHS agents and stand down orders to the LAPD to do nothing with the protesters assaulting the agents. That that is what activated President or what led to President Trump activate the National Guard and then essentially the Marines to act as interim until the National Guard is able to get on scene. But another thing that's very important to note is that people are trying to make it seem like it's a National Guard's presence that is inciting the violence. The fact that they're handling protesters, that couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is the National Guard is being used solely for the purpose of protecting federal buildings. That's it. That's the only location they're in. I haven't seen any National Guard make arrests, use weapons, hit protesters to any capacity. And what this does for people that are wondering, well, what's the National Guard there for? What you have to understand is you got to look back at the George Floyd riots, which I also covered from beginning to end all the way to Derek Chauvin's verdict in Minneapolis. I was there on the ground. What you need to remember is police resources are already limited in Los Angeles because not only are they under resourced and understaffed, but you have the pandemic that just, you know, we're kind of still kind of going through that where a lot of first responders were fired for failing to obey city mandates on masks or vaccines or what have you. And so what this does is it gives the law enforcement the time and the effort to be able to solely focus on arresting protesters in containment while the federal National Guard and potentially the Marines are only going to be taking care of the buildings.

[Charlie Kirk]

TikTok has helped US businesses contribute over $24 billion for the US economy. And we go so viral on TikTok, we get billions and billions of views. You see, that's real money flowing into small businesses like AZ Taco King, who went viral on TikTok and hit $1.3 million in sales in their first year. Now they're hiring more staff to keep up. Or Bluff Cakes, who started as a home baking side hustle and became a national cookie brand. Or the she mechanic whose business tripled in just one year with help from TikTok. Now she's in a bigger space with a bigger team. TikTok is helping small businesses thrive and that's adding up to more jobs and more growth and over $24 billion flowing into the US economy. Our most viral platform is TikTok and by far. Learn more about TikTok's contribution to the US economy at TikTok economicimpact.com We are winning the next generation at Turning Point USA and on the Charlie Kirk show, large in part thanks to us getting the Message out at TikTok. Go to TikTok economicimpact.com Kaylin Delameda and Anthony Cabasa are With us guys, I want to ask you some specific questions about how you do what you do, but I want to make sure you both plug your social. Kaelin first and then Anthony, because that's how you guys really grow your platform. Kaelin first.

[Kaylin Delameda]

Thanks, Charlie. So my. You can follow me on X or Instagram. Romkailen. That's F R O M K A L E N. And really, it's just a matter of being brave and staying out there, knowing what to look for and what to watch out for when you're on the ground. Because in a lot of ways, you're watching out for these agitators. You don't know who they are. They're extremely unpredictable and violent. And so you're watching out for them. Then you're also trying to make sure that you're not going to be mistaken for one of them while you're covering what's going on and other things. You know, if you see a burning American flag, let's go. Let's go document that. If you see somebody breaking into a store and they're robbing all the Jordans, let's go document that. If you see them screaming and hurling insults or throwing things, or you find a pile of bricks or anything like that, There are certain things that we need to document in order to. In order to really tell the full story, because we know the mainstream media won't be doing that.

[Charlie Kirk]

So, Anthony, let me ask you. First, plug your social. Anthony. And then I want to ask, walk your audience through what you do. You embed yourself in these crowds. I hope everyone in the audience understands. Kaylin and Anthony, they could get killed doing this. I know you guys know this. They could get seriously hurt. These are very, very dangerous environments. This is not just like, oh, you know, we're going to look at it. They are up right next to the agitators, right next to the rioters. I mean, they smell the funk of these lowlifes. Anthony, plug your social and tell us about that. I think the audience needs to develop an appreciation of the grittiness and the balls that you guys have. Anthony.

[Anthony Cabasa]

Thank you so much, Charlie. Yeah, so if you guys want to follow me on social media, I go by informed with Anthony, as in like you are being informed. So informed with Anthony on. On all socials. That's true social, that is Instagram, TikTok, even. We're showing the truth there of what's happening in la. And then just on X, it's just my name, Anthony Cabasa, Underscore. You guys can check me out. There, that's where I'm posting most of my footage is on X. Because thankful to Elon Musk, I bought it. You know, I, I covered the riots of George floyd under Twitter 1.0 and I was actually banned the entire time of the riots. And so I'm just thankful that Elon bought X so that we can have free speech again and maybe make, make some money in, in the process. But yeah, that's a question. And Charlene, a really great point. Thank you so much for that. I'm an independent journalist. I've been doing independent journalism since 2017. I am a US veteran. I have a family, I have a wife and three kids. We live in LA County. I'm just one of those conservative journalists and just one of those conservatives and Christians that yes, we could just get up and leave. You know, we can just sell our home and move to Tennessee, move to Florida. But I just believe that there's also a need for, for people to stay and fight. And so that's, that's the model that I live by. We have to stay here and fight. I don't want to cede a single inch of America to communists, to Marxists, to liberals. These people will not run me out of my home. I will stand up and fight no matter what. And that's what I do with my journalism. What people need to understand is about the mainstream media is when you have antifa and these Marxists coming in and destroying property, they run the media out. Fox News is not welcome if you walk. If you work for Fox News and they recognize you, they will bully you until you leave. And if not, not, it can escalate from there. But I have been tear gassed, I've been shot at. You know, it's part of the work. I actually have, believe it or not, emails from ACLU and other left wing kind of law firms that are begging me to join their lawsuits against Donald Trump and the federal government because I'm an independent journalist recording. But look, it's, you know, as a veteran myself, I understand getting in the thick of it. I understand that it's kind of like guerrilla warfare style journalism. We don't have these fancy cameras worth thousands where we can just zoom in. We don't have a helicopter to zoom in via a camera like most of the news do. We have to get in there. And sometimes, yes, we get hit by police with rubber bullets or ricochets, whatever it might be. I've been tear gas way too many times. I actually have developed a system with my wife that the moment I come in, I head straight to the garage. I'm not allowed inside the home smelling like funk. So we kind of have to, you know, do that stuff out on the outdoor. But, yeah, you know, I'm very supported by all my audience members. I've got about 200,000 on Instagram. A lot of people have been donating to my links, and so it's just great. We're going to continue the work no matter what.

[Charlie Kirk]

Let me just say one final thing here, which is very important. Can we show some of the images, guys, and I'll brag it both on Kaylin and Anthony here. You guys understand all these images we're seeing here are sourced from independent journalists. This is not legacy news media. Understand this, that if we, if we do not have Frontlines, we don't have Anthony. We would not have the stories here. We would not have the truth of what's really going on. Instead, it would be synthesized and filtered through a media lens. So God bless you both guys. Thank you so much. Anthony Caboza and Kalyn Delameda, thank you guys.

[Anthony Cabasa]

Thank you, Charlie.

[Charlie Kirk]

Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us. As always, freedomarliekirk.com thanks so much for listening and God bless.

[Anthony Cabasa]

For more on many of these stories and news you can Trust, go to charliekirk.com.