A (20:24)
And people are still without power. Millions of people are still without power. Because instead of using a form of energy that has worked since the Industrial Revolution, the ideologues that run our government that are more concerned with checking the boxes of the wish list of the professors of the University Texas Austin, they put in windmills and they close down power plants. And then people die as a consequence of that. And this is only going to repeat itself in many different manifestations. We have to ask ourselves, the question is, why did they do this? Why did they do something so foolish and silly when it comes to energy in America, when it's so obvious that this was not the right move, why replace a quarter of all energy in Texas one fourth to be wind? It's an eyesore on the entire landscape. They're also incredibly expensive to build. The main reason is nothing to do with the efficacy of green energy. Instead, it's about the ideology behind it. And this is a moment where we have to take pause and ask ourselves the question, why are we allowing a small pack of highly activistic ideologues create, steer and control the public policy of. Of an entire nation? Any rational person, an actually rational person approaching the energy conversation will ask some very simple questions, such as, are rising global temperatures tied with an increase in human activity? Can you prove that? The answer is you can't. You can suspect it, you can infer it, you can try to draw a correlation and a causation, but you can't prove it. There are dozens of other factors that could potentially play into it. Number two, which is, what have we proven that we can do? If the first question is yes, and we take that As a given, what can we do to lessen our carbon emissions to potentially lower global temperatures that might potentially result in a normalization of the climate, which is a false flag anyway because we have such a short window of measuring global temperatures. We've only been doing it for about 100 years and we've only been doing it super accurately for 30 years. And we've only been doing it at the level we're doing it with satellite reconnaissance in the last 15 or 20 years. But let's even take the hundred year window as a given. Have there been any variations? Of course there have been. We went from a global ice age fear mongering narrative in the 1970s and 80s on the front page of Time magazine it said the ice age is near the to the global warming fear mongering in the early 2000s of Al Gore, where I was forced to watch inconvenient truth in sixth grade. So now where we are in 2021, where they are now blending two together to climate change calling an existential threat to humanity. There is more greenery on the planet than there ever has been in the history of recording such metric. The third question we must ask ourselves, which is a rational question because this entire conversation has been hijacked by irrational people, is at what cost? What's the cost? This is what people who slow down and use reason, which is given to us by God to be able to make sense of a chaotic world. We use reason to make informed choices. Nothing about installing windmills at the expense of human flourishing is reasonable. It's ideological, it's pathological in nature. And so now we are living to the consequence of that. Now the devil's advocate argument. The socialist activists would say we are now living through the weather patterns because we didn't make these decisions earlier. There is no evidence to support that. That is speculative. That is not science. That is a theory. And that theory very well might be right. I'm a skeptic. And we should be, because there's about 582 questions that I could think of the top of my head, such as is every single region getting warmer? Are there any positives to areas getting warmer? Are the ice caps really melting at the rate you thought they were? Why is the polar bear population increasing? There's so many questions that you can be asked. These are reasonable questions. And so this goes to a broader and deeper point that we're going to continue to build out, which is I thought science was all about asking questions. I thought science was all about challenging. The predominant narrative isn't that how we discovered germ theory? Isn't that how Newtonian physics was proven? The idea that we must now unquestionably accept whatever narrative that is being put forth by the ideologues without even asking what the cost might be of that narrative, if that narrative might even be true, is pathological in nature. And that's how you get to a set of circumstances where the entire Great Plains is now without power. They have to resort to backup generators at hospitals. People will die as a consequence of this, in hospitals, in nursing home facilities. And yet what is the Democrat answer to this? What is the. And I don't even like using the term Democrat because it's beyond that. What is the climate change alarmist answer as not to admit that they might have made some mistakes in energy distribution and consumption? It's the exact opposite, is that we did not do enough early enough, and now we must embrace what we did wrong more. And this is the great irony, and I have so many friends in California. My Pastor, Pastor Rob McCoy is in California. And people in California ask me this question all the time. They say, when will the people of California wake up? And I hope the answer is very soon. Which is why all of you should sign the petition to recall Gavin Newsom. Maybe he might get a notice of the recall signatures increasing in number in between bites at French Laundry. But California can go one of two ways. It can either wake up and go back to reasonable rational governance, or this is the way that sometimes it goes. And you're seeing this in some of these other liberal states like Oregon and Washington, New York, Rhode island and Connecticut. They can say the reason that you're unhappy is we didn't go left enough, we didn't go radical enough, we didn't abolish enough fossil fuel, we did not get rid of enough different aspects of energy. And let me be clear. I'm for free market, entrepreneurial driven solutions. Elon Musk, free of government subsidies, wants to come up with solutions to be able to make energy consumption more efficient. So be it. But windmills are typically not built by private industry. They are done in public, private partnerships, specifically through government edicts. And in the heartland of the country near the Permian Basin, to go build a grid of wind turbines that then need to be de iced by helicopters that are made possible thanks to fossil fuels of oil and natural gas that was extracted from the Permian Basin. The only answer that we can offer to that is that we are allowing ideologues to run the country where they believe falsely A narrative that the entire world is falling apart. And their dramatic action against the capitalist private property western economy is the only way that we're going to fix that. It's complete and total rubbish. The activist media is spinning this as saying, see, we told you that weather patterns are getting worse. You see, we told you that this was going to happen when their coverage should be the opposite. Which is what did we overreact to that makes the reaction to this event even worse. Cancel culture is a big problem. We just saw it with Lucasfilm and we're seeing it all over the place. The Internet never forgets and there's never been a more important time to protect your Internet activity. That's why I urge you to get ExpressVPN. Everything you search for, watch or click online can be tracked by big tech companies. They then match your activity to your true identity using your device's unique IP address. When I switch on ExpressVPN with my computer or phone, my my IP address is masked by a secure VPN server, which makes it harder for websites to identify me. The ExpressVPN app also encrypts my network data to protect my sensitive information from being compromised. Plus you can use ExpressVPN on up to five devices simultaneously so multiple users on your network can stay safe with a single subscription. What I like most is how easy it is to use. It just takes one click to protect all your devices. That's why they're rated the number one VPN on CNET and Wired. So stop handing over all your data to big tech companies. Go with the VPN I trust for online protection. Visit expressvpn.com Charlie to get three months free on a one year package. That's E X P R-E-S-S VPN.com Charlie to get three extra months free, go to expressvpn.com Charlie right now to learn more. There have been people this last year, the last 12 months, that had a really difficult year and they still continue to pay their taxes and they continue to still pay for essential government services. You see, one of the lies of the left, and this is what happens when you go to college, is they don't teach you economics, they don't teach you supply and demand, they don't teach you what money actually is. What money represents is they believe that the entire country should basically be connected to a leviathan albatross of a government. This is something that AOC and Taliban, Elon, Omar all believe that if we just expand the civil service, if we expand government Payroll, things will get a lot better. And the question that I can't stand that is asked all the time is, well, how are you going to pay for that? That's the wrong question. They'll find a way to pay for it. They'll create the money out of thin air. They'll deficit spend, they'll tax you. They'll find a way to pay for it. Instead you should ask, is it right? That's the question you should ask. Not how can you pay for it. If you get into a question of how can you pay for it? You've already admitted that it's a good idea. Instead you should say, is it right? Is it right to expand the government civil service to millions of more people like the Democrats want to do? You see, the tension that we see between private industry and government civil service is more dramatic than any other time in my life. The muscular class of our country, the entrepreneurs, the people that own their businesses, the people that have to sign the front of a paycheck, not just the back of a paycheck, they are being squeezed and they had a little bit of a reprieve. They had a little bit of a time to breathe under President Donald Trump. Now Joe Biden is offering a deflated currency, higher taxes, more regulation, and it will be the small business person. I don't even like that term small business person. I think it's overused. I call it the backbone business person. They are the backbone of our country. How do we thank our taxpayers for once? And we thank the people that go pay the six figure tax bills to the IRS so that you're able to get your $1,000 stimulus check. When was the last time we said thank you to them? What if they just took a couple months off? They said, you know what? I'm not going to create any value for the economy. I'm going to shut down all my businesses. I'm going to shut down the supply chain. I'm going to not pay my taxes. You want to talk about catastrophic? That would be catastrophic. And some teachers deserve phenomenal credit. They really do. Other teachers that are refusing to open up their schools or being part of movements not to open up their schools, they don't deserve that same form of credit. Thank you taxpayers. Thank you hardworking business people. The muscular class that's keeping this whole thing going. Two things happened in the last 10 days that would not have happened if Donald Trump was still president. A prominent Democrat staffer resigned after yelling at a reporter, TJ Ducklow, who got very angry at I Think her name is Tara Palmeri at Politico, who does a nice job there. And she was writing a story about him potentially having a relationship with a former Biden staffer. He got very angry and said, quote, I will destroy you. Got put on leave, and then he was asked to resign or he resigned himself. It was very interesting. And Democrats have been rather insistent the last year and a half to never allow some sort of press controversy to impact one of their own being criticized or attacked. And then on top of that, you have another story here that we did not cover, but it was a national news story of Mark Cuban, who I've actually debated before. You guys should check that out online. In fact, I'm going to make a note of myself to make sure that video is uploaded. I haven't seen that video in quite some time. Mark Cuban and I debated for about an hour and a half. It was fun. It was at our Turning Point USA High School Leadership Summit. Mark Cuban said he was not going to play the national anthem at the Dallas Mavericks game. No one was coming anyway. But standard respect to play the national anthem for the country that you're in. Obviously he got overruled by the National Basketball association, and they said, that's a little bit too woke even for us. You see, you're starting to see the Democrat coalition, the Democrat Party, the Democrat movement start to splinter a little bit. You're starting to see the Democrat ruling class and the Democrats elites start to get worried that maybe their movement will not be unified. Which kind of made me thought for a minute as I was processing this theory, maybe when Joe Biden was talking about unity, he was not talking about national unity. Maybe he was talking about Democrat Party unity. Maybe he was talking about not allowing the different factions or the different parts of the Democrat Party to splinter. I'm starting to see more and more evidence of this. The New York Times came out with a piece by Eric Kaufman, who's a professor who studies and writes about demographics, partisanship and ideology, which says, quote, how stable is the Democratic coalition? Quote, the party may control the elected branches in Washington, but it may be facing some slippage in support from minority communities. It starts by saying, quote, democrats are riding high in Washington with control of the White House and Congress. They got there with a broad coalition that included suburban, white and minority voters. I estimate, based on exit poll data, that nearly half of the Democrat party, roughly 81 million voters, came from the latter group. For Republicans, it was just 18%. The argument that he makes is that therefore all Republicans have to do is increase their number from 18% to 22%. Continue to invigorate and expand their base, and you're going to have a pretty sizable and formidable political opposition. The article continues by citing many pieces of data, by saying, quote, many minorities that no longer identify as Democrats have become independents rather than Republicans, much like their white Catholic predecessors initially did. But this means their loyalties are increasingly up for grabs on election Day. Talks about how Hispanics went in the Republican direction historically in the 2020 presidential election. You also see this with the strange amount of propaganda that no one asked for, but just seems to be emerging and bubbling to the surface, saying that Republicans want a third party. No, we don't. It sounds nice, but when rational people are presented with that proposal, they always reject it. They know it will splinter the party. They know it will give totalitarians more power, and they walk away from it. And so the question is, who's actually pushing this third party narrative? The answer is Democrat operatives that are seeing the fault lines within their own party. They're starting to see the most ideological members of the Democrat Party starting to create political liabilities for them. With no Trump, what is the message of the Democrat Party? Certainly not going to be very popular to talk about the Green New Deal as people have to shovel themselves out in Texas, where they have no power thanks to the solar panel windmill operation. It's certainly not going to be transgender policies that are now being forced in elementary and high schools across the country. What is their policy agenda? You see, Democrats always view everything through a power struggle. That's part of their philosophy. It's very postmodern that. It's not about a battle of ideas. It's not about the pursuit of truth. Instead, it's who's in power, who isn't in power. And we must try to overthrow the quote, unquote oppressor, the fallow, logocentric Western patriarchy, which is a common talking point of the activist left. So because of this, they are trying to implement a strategy to give themselves more political power. And that strategy is very simple. That strategy is, instead of worrying about the fault lines in our own party, let's just try to make the Republican Party fracture. Right now. We will elevate any Republicans that oppose the now former President Trump and his coalition, like Adam Kinzinger, like Liz Cheney, like Bill Cassidy, like Susan Collins, like Ben Sasse. We will probe articles and stories around the creation of third parties, which is something that is completely out of nowhere. That's their strategy. But what Biden was warning about was not national unity. That is very clear. If Biden wanted national unity, he would not have banned new fracking on federal lands. He would not have signed the radical transgender executive order. If Biden wanted national unity, he would have a completely different way of governing. When was the last time Joe Biden looked in the eyes of someone that supported and voted for Donald Trump? He had some Republican senators come meet with him, some of whom were Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski. When was the last time Joe Biden, under his mission to unify the country, actually did something to unify America? It's because Joe Biden was never concerned about unifying America. He was concerned about unifying the Democrat Party. The Democrats big gamble is playing out right now. Their big gamble is this. If we play our cards right, we will never be out of power. Their big gamble is to engage in propaganda's techniques and tactics that will result in the bitter division of the country. But they'll be in power forever. We're going to change the way we vote, we're going to change the way we talk, we're going to change the way we communicate, we're going to change the way we educate. We're going to change the way that we do business. All so that we remain in power, not what's actually best for the country. But Democrats have never been what interest in what's best in the country. I, I get so exhausted when I hear people say, well you know Charlie, we all want the same thing. We just have different ways of getting there. No we don't. Democrats do not want the same thing that I do. They want men in women's locker rooms, I don't. They want post birth abortions, I don't. They want open borders, I don't. They want private property to erode and disappear. I don't. So the Democrats big gamble is that they know the fault lines are happening, that if the rules stayed in place that allow backlash from the people, they will eventually be out of power. Their big gamble is not to unify the country, but unify the party and rule with an iron fist and create a one party state like California. That's their definition of unity. The absence of opposition. A lot of you guys have had Mike Lindell's back. I know a lot of you guys want to continue to have his back. And the amazing company that you guys are supporting is MyPillow, the inventor and CEO of MyPillow. Mike Lindell is fighting very, very hard. And a lot of you guys say I want to reward Courage. If you go to mypillow.com and use the promo code Kirk, you guys can basically get this amazing pillow that they sent me. You guys can get Giza dream seats, you guys can get toppers robes, you name it. If you want to support the good guys, support people with courage. I know a lot of you guys do. MyPillow.com promo code Kirk. Remember all Mypillow products come with a 60 day money back guarantee and a 10 year warranty. And you can get the Giza dream seats. You can get the whole thing. Go to mypillow.com promo code Kirk. Mypillow.com promo code Kirk we just got some breaking news here. Looks like a US military contractor was killed in Iraq from Shiite militants, Shiite militia. So Shiite are almost always tied in one way or the other to Iran, Saudi Arabia and most of the countries on the Arabian Peninsula are Sunni. Shiite is almost all Iranian. Shiite is a small fraction of all the Muslims across the world. So this is probably connected with the number one sponsor of terrorism on the planet, Iran. So why is Iran doing this? Well, of course they smell weakness. That's why. And they also, they want to have negotiating and bargaining position over Joe Biden. You see, the way the Obama Biden foreign policy worked is whatever Iran wants, they get. We have to even the playing field. If Iran wants a bomb, we'll give them a bomb. If Iran wants $500 million, we'll give it to them too. So now Iran is opening with a warning shot saying if you do not give us the Iranian to enrich, if you do not give us the permission of the international community, Americans will die. Now Iran will deny responsibility for this, but any person in the foreign policy space, and I've been texting with just a couple of them here, will tell you that anyone connected with Shiite militia is in one way or the other funded, supported, trained, or even in direct communication with Iran. And one of the problems with this too is Joe Biden might react disproportionately. Joe Biden might act in a way to prove people that he is not a foreign policy dove and he might get us entangled in another foreign war. You see, the brilliance of the administration that just ended, the Trump administration in their foreign policy approach is they isolated Iran, they put sanctions on Iran, they unified the entire Arab world around Iran because Iran was, was and is the greatest enemy in the Middle East. So as soon as you start to give other Arab allies like the UAE confidence that the closer they grow to America, the more support they'll have against Iran. UAE then becomes likely to do things they otherwise would not have done, things that otherwise would have been considered uncharacteristic, such as negotiating a peace deal between the United Arab Emirates and Israel. Something that still bothers me how President Trump never got credit for literally brokering and achieving Middle east peace. That is now all being put into jeopardy under Joe Biden and his administration. And so this rocket attack in Iraq, I'm reading from the New York Times as it just broke, it was aimed at an airport in the northern city of Erbil on Monday, killed a civilian contractor with the American led military coalition. They knew what they were doing. They might claim responsibility and say that this is retaliation for Soleimani. When Qasem Soleimani, who killed hundreds of Americans, was killed by a drone strike right outside of an airport in Baghdad. And so Joe Biden's response to this will be very, very interesting. Will he react with Tomahawk missiles peppered all throughout Iran? Will he support a ground invasion or will he try to get to a negotiating position with Iran? What President Trump realized, and Mike Pompeo and his entire team realized, was that negotiating with Iran was not working. The way to prevent war with Iran, the way to put your country first, is actually put crippling sanctions on them, which will destroy their industrial base, their manufacturing ability, and will bring them back to the negotiating table, not with confidence, but in crisis. And so now the exact opposite is happening. Iran is now bragging that they are close to enriching uranium to get a nuclear weapon. They know that the Joe Biden administration will give them a path to do that. And this is absolutely a test for the Biden administration. How much are they going to involve ourselves in this region. One of the things that President Trump also never got credit for is ending the endless wars is de escalating conflict in Afghanistan, withdrawing troops. He did that all the while of negotiating peace in the region and putting Iran on defense. What did the Middle east look like before Donald Trump took office? We had the failed military intervention in Libya with Barack Obama and Joe Biden. We had the failure in Syria and Iran was running the entire Middle east and Israel was on defense. Now, I'm of the opinion that we need to get ourselves divested, generally from a permanent military occupation in the region. The best way to do that, broker peace. So this will be a very, very fascinating first chapter in the Joe Biden foreign policy portfolio, as Iran has now killed an American. Will Joe Biden, who was known for signing off on the deal that sent hundreds of millions of dollars to Iran. Stand up to them. And if he will, how will he do that? Ron DeSantis is getting national headlines. And I'll tell you right now that the difference between Andrew Cuomo and his handling of the nursing home scandal, which is real and it is A major scandal, versus the brilliance of Ron DeSantis handling everything in Florida, is dramatic. Ron DeSantis is not stopping there. The best governor America is now stepping up and challenging the big tech companies. Do you know why I love this? It's one thing to complain. It's one thing to point out problems. It's another thing to offer solutions, to start to be a leader with courage. You see, leadership requires clarity and requires the capacity to find solutions to entrenched problems. One of those problems that we've talked about extensively here on this program is how a small collection of big tech companies worth trillions of dollars control the minds of our young people, control the information flow in our country, the news flow of our country, and they must be challenged and stopped. Let's go to cut seven of Ron DeSantis saying Floridians should not have to give up their most intimate information to use a mobile device. Now, before we go to Cut seven, I have to say this. Donald Trump should have given this speech two years ago and he should have rallied states to do this two years ago. And, and he might have gotten reelected. If Donald Trump would have done what Ron DeSantis did in this speech right here, he very well might have been reelected. Why do I say that? Because his election was the most interfered with election in American history. The Time magazine article admits it. The secret shadow campaign to save the 2020 election. We did an entire podcast on it. I encourage you to check out that podcast. I think it was a week and a half ago on Friday. I encourage you to check it out. And I'm not faulting Donald Trump for not doing this, saying he could have done more and he should have done more on this. Let's go to cut 7.