Unknown Speaker 2 (4:15)

For the three Conservatives that are here tonight, I hope you guys get your mojo back. This was once a great country. I want to see it great again. You guys are a husk of your former self. You guys, you can laugh and sneer all you want, but the country that split the atom and invented the steam engine and eradicated slavery and brought common law to the world can do a lot better than this. And you are your existence, led to our existence. And for whatever I can do, I hope that this country finds a leader or a group of leaders. I'm not here to give you political advice. I hate when foreigners do that to Americans. You guys, whatever you want, but I do have a wish that the world feels like it's missing something. It feels like it's missing something when Great Britain or England or whatever politically correct thing I have to say, because I guess England, I can't fly an English flag now, or whatever nonsense that is. Be proud of your heritage. You've done good for the world. Stop apologizing. Get your energy, get your vitality. Get what made England and made Great Britain such a phenomenal place. I hope you get that back and I hope that you Reject the swan song of multiculturalism and get back to the fundamental truism that a strong Britain means a strong world and therefore a strong west. And we can stand up for what is good, true and beautiful.

Andrew Colvett (5:34)

Man, what a breath of fresh air Charlie Kirk is to the uk. Amen. Get your mojo back. The country of Churchill and Margie Thatcher. So many proud British points in history, so many proud British Britons that have paved the way and pioneered a way and gave us this country. Let's not forget in the British Commonwealth when it spread across the world, all of those colonies that became their own countries and got self rule and all these things but that went through British colonialism are succeeding far beyond those of the French colonies or the Spanish colonies, the Portuguese colonies or the Belgian colonies. The British people have a proud, a proud history and we need to remember that. Now here's another long clip. This is gonna be. This is the Charlie Kirk show. So this is an ode to Charlie Kirk.

Unknown Speaker 3 (6:26)

So you've condemned the Civil Rights act of 1964 as a huge mistake.

Unknown Speaker 2 (6:31)

Correct.

Unknown Speaker 3 (6:31)

Why do you believe it was a mistake to pass anti discrimination legislation? And what do you think would be better policy for being treated for fairly and equally, which you see as an American principle?

Unknown Speaker 2 (6:42)

Yeah, nothing against the intent, but it was too broadly written and it played into something called disparate impact. Disparate impact was woven within the Civil Rights Act. And disparate impact basically says if two racial groups have different outcomes, the answer must be racism. It does not allow any legal nuance. So there are four components to quote unquote, the anti racist regime of America. I don't pretend to know what goes on in this country. I could just talk about America. I'm sure that's fine. And it's four affirmative action, critical race theory, DEI and disparate impact. Those are the kind of the four components, all of them have their subsection. The Civil Rights act led the way to affirmative action, which is weaponized reverse racism against Asian and white people. And the Civil Rights act also blazed the trail for disparate impact as a legal theory. Basically saying that if black Americans are doing worse in a group, it might not be because of marital differences or cultural differences or single motherhood issues. It must be racism. And so because of that, the Civil Rights act was too broadly written. So the intent, it should have been a single page or a two page bill to say that you cannot discriminate against based on the color of somebody's skin. Period, end of story. Instead we get a multiple hundred page bill with lots of chapters and lots of lesser known amendments that created basically a permanent anti racist bureaucracy within our federal government to go find racism where it doesn't exist and create it new places where otherwise did not exist.

Andrew Colvett (7:59)

Now that is a really good answer from Charlie. Oftentimes Charlie will get asked that when he's in liberal settings. You know, what's your problem with the Civil Rights Act? Obviously, nobody has a problem with the intent of the Civil Rights Act. We believe that everybody should be treated equally under the law. However, we've talked about it as well that the Civil Rights act was largely a second founding of America, that modern Americans probably have more reverence for the Civil Rights act than they do for the Constitution. But in some ways the Civil Rights act overreached, overstretched and created bureaucracy that allows men and women's restrooms and locker rooms. So good for Charlie. I love that he stood on it. And there's another story that's going on in the UK right now that's really interesting. There's a woman named Lucy Conley. Go ahead and throw that image up. Lucy Conley is a British woman. She was jailed for 31 months, all because of a tweet that she posted that was quickly deleted. And the tweet, we don't have to like the tweet. We don't have to agree with the tweet, but she deleted it. She showed contrition. Lucy Connolly has been jailed. She's a mother, I believe she has a 12 year old child. Her husband has been left to care for this child. There's been zero leniency. Yesterday she was denied her appeal to get out of jail. And the tweet was something along the lines of. And she was upset about the immigration situation and some of these facilities. There you go, master. Deportations now set fire to all of the hotels full of the, I guess the illegals, using American parlance for all I care. While you're at it, to make the treacherous government and politicians and take the treacherous government politicians with them. She deleted this tweet. It was just a tweet. And she had been jailed. She's been jailed for incitement. Now the Britons that support this, they think that this is just the guardrails around. Healthy, productive speech. Well, this is not. This does not meet an American threshold for incitement, in which case you need to say a specific place and a specific person and a specific means. That would be incitement in the American context. This is just blowing off steam. She's upset about the Mass immigration into the uk, which a lot of Britons are. And she's been jailed for 31 months and no leniency. Meanwhile, child rapists in the UK have roamed free for decades. Two tiered justice system.

Unknown Speaker 1 (10:51)

The world is waking up to the power of gold. National banks are scrambling to secure it. According to the World Gold Council, central banks added 1,000 tons of gold in 2024, the third straight year of net gold buying. They understand what many investors don't. Gold is real money. Unlike paper currency, gold's value doesn't disappear with inflation, reckless government spending or market crashes. Now, Noble Gold Investments makes it easy for you to claim your share as our new administration works to reverse the economic chaos of the past. Market swings are inevitable when uncertainty rises. You need something solid, something to keep you on the path to financial freedom. Gold can be that foundation. And right now, when you make a qualified investment, Noble Gold will send you a free 10th ounce of a cold coin. Visit noblegold investments.com that's noblegold investments dot com. The world is turning to gold. Shouldn't you be looking into doing that too?

Andrew Colvett (11:51)

I'm just loving these clips from Charlie in the uk. Charlie is going there with a message of freedom. He's debating people. He's bringing the same verve that we've taken to college campuses, these islands of totalitarianism in the United States, taking it to the other side of the pond. But I just want to finish one thought here on the Lucy Connelly. Go ahead and put her picture back up. Guys. Lucy Connelly issued a tweet. Maybe wasn't the best tweet. I don't know why there's black bars in that picture. Maybe find another one. Maybe it wasn't the best tweet, wasn't the nicest tweet. She took it down. She showed contrition, which, by the way, she didn't even need to do. I don't think it was incitement. She was blowing off steam. She's upset about the mass immigration, which millions of British citizens are upset about mass immigration and they are. You know, she gets arrested. Stripped of her liberty. There is no free speech if that is allowed to happen in the UK. Now, all these people, I've been watching the Twitter, there's, of course we have free speech. That's absurd to say we don't have free speech. Lucy Connelly did not have free speech. And if Lucy Connelly does not have free speech, then there is no free speech in the uk. It was a harmless tweet. Maybe it was Not a great tweet. She would admit that it was not a great tweet, but she took it down nevertheless, you know, maybe a fine. Okay. And there's a lot of these other people in the uk, they're able to get, you know, like house arrest at the very least, so they can be with their kid and help their husband out who's got to go to work, make a living. Absolutely insane story. Free Lucy Connolly. And by the way, Charlie has promised to bring this issue up with the State Department and see what he can do. I'm gonna play one other clip here from Charlie. He went on GB News and he's talking about this very issue.

Unknown Speaker 4 (13:43)

Have you heard of a lady called Lucy Connolly since you've been here?

Unknown Speaker 5 (13:45)

Of course. I talked about her yesterday and no one knew what I was talking about in Cambridge.

Unknown Speaker 4 (13:49)

Who are you talking about? Who the students didn't know.

Unknown Speaker 5 (13:51)

I mentioned her because I did the research. My team did an amazing job. And I think she just had her.

Unknown Speaker 4 (13:55)

Petition denied in the last hour or so today. It's Tuesday today. She's had her appeal denied, so she's going to be carrying out her two and a half year sentence for solitary tweets. So she deleted for four hours later. What's your take on the whole situation?

Unknown Speaker 5 (14:08)

I'm going to try to get the U.S. state Department involved. I don't know if you know what their bandwidth is here, but I'm sorry, like, again, I'm speaking as citizen, not as US government.

Unknown Speaker 2 (14:15)

I just want to be very clear.

Unknown Speaker 5 (14:16)

Like, is this a way that a liberal democracy and an ally of the United States acts? Just to be clear, what she said would not be any prison time in America. I don't like what she said, but she showed contrition. Well, there's two parts. The first part where she said, like, I don't want immigrants in my country. Perfectly acceptable, that's fine. But you'd say that you're allowed to have that. I think there was one part about, like, potentially like violent. Whatever she said, let me kind of.

Unknown Speaker 2 (14:38)

Yeah, I want to be clear.

Unknown Speaker 4 (14:39)

So. So I think. I think by the time she sent the tweets, some asylum hotels were in the midst of being burned down or their Molotovs thrown through a window. She tweeted, burn them down for all I care.

Unknown Speaker 5 (14:51)

You're allowed to say that in America.

Unknown Speaker 4 (14:53)

So the argument is, was she inciting via or was she reacting to the images she was saying?

Unknown Speaker 5 (14:59)

And by the way, just to be clear, you guys have the wrong incitement. Threshold. In America, you need to have specific time and specific place in order to reach the incitement threshold. Every day people say, well, someone should go kill Charlie Kirk. I don't like it, but. But that's protected speech. In America, we care about what you do, not about what you say. And then she showed contrition and she apologized. And from my understanding, when the police force showed up to her door, they asked her questions, being like, you know, do you think that do you hate immigrants? No, she gave like very satisfactory answers and they still arrested her. And I just find it so outrageous that she's going to now jail for two and a half years for a deleted social media post that she apologized for. As you guys have birthed free speech to the world, you now guys are becoming a totalitarian country.

Andrew Colvett (15:44)

As you birth free speech to the world, you're now becoming a totalitarian country. Well said, Charlie Kirk. The threshold was not met. This is an outrageous over sentencing. And by the way, I will say, you know, the UK is so screwed up. I mean, Tommy Robinson got, we found out, is gonna be released from prison in the UK this week. And what happened? The judge forced him to delete his documentary off of X that had tens and tens of millions of views about immigration, about Muslim immigration specifically, which is a no, no in the uk you're not allowed to not appreciate Muslims coming into your country in the droves. So this is a big story. It's across the pond, yes. But we need a rebirth of free freedom around the Western world if we're going to stand against all of the forces that are coming against the country. So good on Charlie. I'm really proud of what he's doing. This is cultural suicide throughout the West. And we need voices, strong voices from the west that know how to win, that know how to be forceful and take it to our friends and allies and remind them of who they are. Remind them of who they are. You're the people of Churchill. Stand up and be strong. Stop apologizing for yourself. We'll be right back with Chip Roy.

Unknown Speaker 1 (17:04)

Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here. Brand new year, brand new opportunities to change the world for the better. It's easier than you might think. You can save babies by providing ultrasounds with preborn. Together with the Sanctity of Human Life Month, we're gonna save 35,000 babies to show the world that not only do we believe life is precious, but we're gonna do something about it. Your gift of preborn will give a girl the truth about what's happening in her body so that she can make the right choice. What better way to start this new year than to join us to save babies. And $28 a month will save a baby a month all year long. A $15,000 gift will provide a complete ultrasound machine that will save thousands of babies for years and years to come and will also save moms from a lifetime of pain and regret. I am a donor to this organization, and you should be, too. Start this new year by being a hero for life. Call 833-850-2229 or click on the preborn banner at charliekirk.com that is charliekirk.com and click on the preborn banner. I'm a donor. You should be, too. CharlieKirk.com Preborn Banner.

Andrew Colvett (18:06)

All right. Welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show. Andrew Colvid in for the one and only Charlie Kirk, who's headed back now, I'm told, from across the pond. So he'll be back in the chair tomorrow. We're with me right now is the great congressman from the great state of Texas, Representative Chip Roy. Welcome to the show, Congressman. Thank you for taking the time. I know there's a lot going on right now on Capitol Hill. You guys in the middle of a very contentious debate. Why don't you give us the latest? I saw your colleagues that are sort of on the budget hawk side are saying the bill maybe got worse overnight. Give us an update of what happened and where we stand.

Charlie Kirk (18:45)

Well, I wouldn't say the bill got worse. What I would say is the prospects for the bill got a little bit worse last night. I mean, look, we were here all night long. I'm on the Rules Committee. In fact, they're still meeting. I'm looking over the screen right now. And you know, we're continuing to try to work through the bill. We've had multiple meetings with the speaker. But what happened was, look, there's a core problem that we have that we want to wrestle with. We believe that the money laundering scheme that has been built into the entire Medicaid operation is inflating the cost of health care while making vulnerable people suffer while they're filling the roles with able bodied. And we need to change that. And we got to end the scam where you got these provider taxes that get put in place and inflate all the prices and make it harder for you to get health care and put vulnerable people on wait lists. We think you got to change that or you can never get the cost of health care down. So that's what we're trying to do. It's not even about getting more, quote, savings. I'm always looking for more savings. But it's about changing that system so you can keep prices down and make the system work and then in the end that will save a lot of money over time. But right now our primary concern is that you've got that issue and you've got a lot of front loaded deficits with backloaded savings. We're trying to compress that with Medicaid work requirements. We've had progress with changing some of the green new scam stuff. We've had progress but we need to go further and we need to fix this Medicaid stuff. We're close, but last night it kind of went off the rails. We had an agreement with the White House. We put it up and we kind of worked it through the speaker's office and the leadership team here and we're not getting anywhere with it. So now we've been a little derailed. So that's what today's about is trying to get that back on track.

Andrew Colvett (20:22)

And Congressman, what happened around midnight? You had a deal. In what respect? What, what, what did you guys come to an agreement on what changed and do we believe we can get back to an agreement?

Charlie Kirk (20:33)

Yeah, well, we had an agreement on a basic set of terms that frankly was on the margins of what we want. Right. Like we want some substantive, really transformative reform so that people out there watching this, you can get cheaper health care, Medicaid can be better. What do we think that looks like getting rid of that ridiculous seven times federal funding for the able bodied over the vulnerable. Right. We should fix that. Well, that got taken off the table so we'll last night was a small tweak. Okay. That means shrinking down and limiting what we call provider taxes, which are the ways that the providers game the system. Inflate the prices and they get federal government dollars to fund those and inflate the prices. We want to shrink that because it'll help everybody. So we made some progress that. Okay, we all agree, let's drop it a little bit. And so we did and we had a couple of other changes. I won't get the weeds on and we thought it was a good deal so we took that forward. The other thing we got was we wanted to stop the fact that about 40 or 50% of the Greenview scam subsidies continue. So we got a little bit shrinking down of that. That's it. We didn't ask for a ton, but we thought it was paramount to move in that direction. So that got unfortunately kind of taken off the table this morning. So we got to get it back.

Andrew Colvett (21:45)

Yeah. Congressman, I want to go back to this 518 tweet. So May 18, you said, you know, and this was the day you voted present. It was big news, but you got the bill through committee and that it was a big hurdle. So you did that in good faith. But you said it fails. Okay, so the you talk about this Green New scam. It fails to end the Medicaid money laundering scam and then it fails to roll back the Green New scams. Didn't every single Republican in the House vote against the Green New Scam? Now why would there be any tension from the Republican caucus, the conference, to not roll that back immediately? Why are we delaying that?

Charlie Kirk (22:29)

Because what happens is when you create a government program, then what happens? People then start getting jobs and make money off those programs. So then you have members of Congress going, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, we don't want to undo that. My view is, look, we stop these subsidies, those people will transition where we want them, which is to natural gas fired plants, nuclear fire plants, reliable energy, other forms of power supply. And rather than continuing to carry out putting solar panels and wind out there, which is unreliable and heavily subsidized and can't actually make the market without the subsidy. So we want to get the subsidies out of the way, but people get their pet projects. The same thing with health care, once you start putting the programs out there, like take for example expansion states. After Obamacare, 40 of the 50 states expanded. So now they have these massive roles that are growing on Medicaid. Texas, Tennessee, Florida, Georgia and other six states, we didn't expand. So we're over here saying, hey, we're trying to save health care freedom. And these other states are getting these massive subsidies for the able bodied. And we're saying that ain't right. So we want to fix that, both for parity for our states, but also for the country. So that's what happens. You put people in the dole, those roles explode. That's the, that's the real story here with Medicaid. The roles exploding because we're doling out money. And by the way, unlike Medicare and Social Security, there's no tax for Medicaid. It just comes out of the general fund. That's why Medicaid went from 400 billion in 2019 to 600 billion this year and is scheduled to be a trillion in 2030. Last point, full disclosure, my Republican colleagues, we have made progress. The bill has moved the needle. We've added work requirements, but we had to fight for that during the budget fight this last weekend. They weren't good enough. We made it better. We're trying to close the deal. We're almost there. But to really make this work for President Trump and Americans, we gotta close the deal.

Andrew Colvett (24:23)

Yeah. And Congressman, I mean, I believe we've known you for a long time, you've been a friend of the show, you've always been very generous with your time. I mean, I genuinely believe that, that the base wants more cuts. The base wants more cuts. And it's putting everybody in kind of an awkward position because we want President Trump to get his bill and we know he wants it, but we also know that actually what you guys are fighting for is in so many ways consistent with the things that we've heard him say. We've, we've heard come out of this administration. Why this, why this arbitrary deadline of Wednesday to push this vote? We're not even gonna have a CBO score. I'm here. Andy Harris, House Freedom Caucus Chair, is saying that this not gonna, it's not gonna pass right now. So why push this in this way if we know we don't have the votes yet? But we're close and people like you are working in good faith to get this to a point where it needs to be.

Charlie Kirk (25:18)

Well, it's always a double edged sword here. Like you wanna use whatever you can to try to move a bill through, get it done, get it over the Senate. Cause we, we still have to work through them, get it back. So I understand why the speaker wants to move it. But whenever you play these pressure games, these jet fumes, holiday games, I think things get a little bit dicey and you run the risk of them all exploding. Do I think we can get the bill done? I still do, but we've got to get some changes. So, you know, we go down the White House, we're going to have a good conversation, hopefully the President with this great team. We've been working a good faith together. And by the way, with the Speaker's team, there's no way to. Mostly here all this is, is a team that's, that's all trying to work to get the job done. You know, remember there were some great scenes where like Peyton Manning is yelling at like Jeff Saturday on the, on the sideline in a game. But they're good buddies, they get a beer afterward. Like, look, we're in the heat of battle and we're kind of yelling at each other on how to win the game. But the President's the quarterback. We're all out there and we're wanting to follow and go, go get the job done, but we need to do it the right way. And we have a role here in Congress to do the same thing. So that's the goal. We hope we'll try to do it, but we got to get it done the right way. So get it done.

Andrew Colvett (26:22)

Yeah, Congressman. I mean, to be clear, however we do this Bill, whether you guys get your concessions or whether the moderates get their concessions, this is going to expand the deficit, correct?

Charlie Kirk (26:34)

Okay. Well, it depends on your perspective on that. I want, I'm a just facts guy. I don't want to skew it. If you take the CBO score and you assume the economic growth that I think you and I and a lot of us believe in, we assumed about 2 1/2% economic growth to create about 2 1/2 trillion dollars of revenue over 10 years. If you assume that growth and you factor that into the CBO score, you would assume we would actually have deficit over 10 years, would actually go down by about 100 or 200 billion. It's kind of finger in the air a bit, but it's heavily back weighted. So a lot of deficits in the first five years, not enough deficits. I mean, not enough, you know, I mean, the savings is all in the back years. So I'm concerned that means we get all of the, you know, desserts and we get none of the, you know, spinach. And we, we need to actually get that done the right way. So to answer your question, they're going to say a lot of things. The Democrats. Oh my God, it's like $3 trillion of additional deficits. I don't think that's right. We believe economic growth comes out of low taxes, low regulations. I'm with the president on that. I'm with my Republican colleagues on that. But I can't just assume it and then assume that we're going to get all the savings in year eight when we're going to be having a $450 billion deficit in 2026, even with Dynamic growth, they assume that much deficit. I've got a problem with that. And we're trying to squeeze that out and get, get expenses down.

Andrew Colvett (27:56)

What about tariff income? Is that factored into the CBO score as well?

Charlie Kirk (28:00)

So it's not. And that's a variable that I think is important. Right. But we're not factoring that in because you can't. Right. It's not, it's not a law that we voted on. The president can move those levers around so you can't fully count on what that would be. For example, if he's successful in telling Venezuela, hey, you're tariffs, unless you take our illegals, you know, your illegals back or, you know, if we're doing tariffs in China or whatever and you start making success, well, then those, those revenues are, they're going to go down. So we can't count on them permanently. But we know there's revenue coming in. So in the back of our minds, we're going, okay, that's good. Factor that in. That's why I can accept some amount of early deficit numbers if we get the growth and the trajectory in the right direction. But that's what we're trying to work on.

Andrew Colvett (28:44)

What about, so the salt deal, right, which was worked on overnight, they got it to 40,000 with a $500,000 income cap over 10, over 10 year. But then it doesn't snap back, apparently at the end. Right. But I'm hearing that this thing is dead in the water in the Senate. There's no blue state Republican Senate, at least not many of them.

Charlie Kirk (29:06)

It certainly would have issues in the Senate. I recognize and believe that. I would also note that while many of the president's priorities, like no tax on tips and extensions of the expensing from the Tax Cuts and Jobs act end in four or five years, these go all the way through 10 years and would score $350 billion. I don't think that was the right deal to cut yesterday by the Speaker. I think that was a mistake. The president yesterday morning came down, he said to Republicans, look, you Freedom Caucus guys, you got to help me out here. Let's focus on waste, fraud and abuse on Medicaid. We can't go the whole hog. And he said to the salt guys, hey, you're not going to get, you know, more salt. Let's keep it where it is. Well, then we get a deal cut with the salt guys. And I'm going, hey, wait a minute, we're over here and we want to try to get this done for the good of the country. I'm not looking for, you know, a parochial tax benefit. And by the way, as a Texan, there'll be some of my constituents who would benefit from their assault deal. I just don't think it's a good deal. If our taxes are too high in Texas, we should go down to Austin and say, hey, guys, cut the taxes. Don't ask for the feds to subsidize it. So we got some work to do. Hopefully we get this Medicaid stuff done today and land the plane. But it does need to change now.

Andrew Colvett (30:16)

Medicaid to me, I mean, people don't realize Medicaid is the fastest growing portion of the federal budget.

Charlie Kirk (30:23)

Yep.

Andrew Colvett (30:23)

And we are actively incentivizing really good states like Texas, Tennessee, Florida because we're making the math not make sense for them to keep being disciplined. So we're going to incentivize them to grow the roles further once they come on. As you made a point chip, they're going to stay on. It's going to be harder to get them off. Thank you for fighting for balanced budgets. Thank you, sir.

Charlie Kirk (30:45)

See you guys.

Unknown Speaker 1 (30:48)

Private student loan debt. So many Americans feel stuck and helpless. They are the sponsor of our campus tour. They are great people. You can finally take control of your student loan situation. @yrefi.com that is yrefy.com they provide you with a custom loan payment based on your ability to pay. Yrefi is not a debt settlement company and they work with each borrower individually tailoring each loan to each borrower's specific situation. You'll not be calling a faceless call center. Yrefi can reduce your monthly payment and guarantees interest rates under 6%. Why refi does not care what your credit score is. Go to yrefi.com that is yrefy.com so take a look at it right now at yrefi.com why? Refinances distress and defaulted private student loans which are different from federal loans. They offer a three minute rate check. So I want you to think right now maybe you have private student loan debt, maybe your friend does, maybe your neighbor got to check it out. Yrefi.com, yrefy.com can you imagine being debt free and not burdened anymore. Go to yrefi.com may not be available in all 50 states.

Unknown Speaker 2 (31:51)

Why?

Unknown Speaker 1 (31:52)

Refi.com.

Andrew Colvett (31:55)

All right. Welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show. Andrew Colvett in for the one and only Charlie Kirk. There's a incredible moment happening right now inside the White House. I have the team pulling the clip. So he President Trump has the president of South Africa in the Oval and obviously there is a lot controversy, I think wrongly placed controversy over the Africans being granted asylum in the United States. People don't like it cuz they're white. Let's just be honest what it is. So President Trump just dimmed the lights in the Oval Office, played this clip for The President of South Africa. Brutal videos of South Africa's leaders calling for the killing of white South African farmers. He shows the burial sites of the farmers. At some point, there must be killing. You can hear and say in the video. And he literally dimmed the light and made this man watch the videos with his eyes. So we are having a kind of a Zelensky 2.0 moment happening within the White House right now. It's pretty remarkable. We're gonna get the clip, we'll play it back so you guys can all hear it for yourself. I mean, but what a powerful moment this. This is. This is something else. So we do have some B roll of it, but, I mean, he did it to his face. Zelensky 2.0 to his face. You never know what you're going to get with President Trump in an Oval Office meeting with another head of state. We've just simply never, ever seen anything like this. But yes, white South Africans. There's the clip right there. White South Africans are getting targeted. Their political leaders are chanting about killing them. They are being murdered. There's been scores of them murdered and targeted. And President Trump is putting a absolute spotlight with moral clarity on the plight of white South African farmers being targeted. Because it has been the Balkanization, the tribalization of this far left ideology, this race hatred that has been allowed to just fester and grow in South Africa. Good for President Trump to shine a light on it like no one else could. So do we have this clip? I think we're almost got this clip. So, yeah, so we've got it. So President Trump is sitting in the Oval Office with the leader of South Africa, the President of South Africa, Cyril. I'll get his name in just a second. It's a confusing one. Ramaphosa, Cyril Ramaphosa. And he's sitting in the White House with him, and he dims the lights and. And he forces him to watch videos of South African political leaders calling for the death of whites right to his face.

Chip Roy (34:40)

Turn the lights down. Turn the lights down and just put this on. It's right behind you, Johan.

Andrew Colvett (34:47)

There's nothing this parliament can do. With or without you people are going to occupy land. We require no permission from you, from the president, from no one.

Chip Roy (35:00)

Now, this is very bad. These are the. These are burial sites right here. Burial sites. Over a thousand of white farmers. And those cars are lined up to pay, love on a Sunday morning. Each one of those white things you see is a cross. And there's a approximately a thousand of them. They're all White farmers.

Andrew Colvett (35:29)

God bless President Trump. He President Trump. I want you guys to appreciate what you just heard or saw is a truly historic moment. It is history unfolding before your eyes. No other US President would have ever pulled anything like that. And God bless him for it. It's the contrast to Joe Biden could not be more stark to feeble, decrepit, wandering, rudderless Joe Biden, whose morality had been so twisted up because of all of his far left staffers and all of the constituencies and coalition members that he had to cater to. There was no moral clarity. And now we have moral clarity. In another way of saying it. President Trump is actually the leader of the free world. Not only is this he the center of the political universe, he is actually the leader of the free world, which goes back to what we talked about with Charlie being in the UK we are calling the west back to itself. We are calling all of the west back to itself to return to its former glory. And South Africa needs to live up to its own morality here. Nelson Mandela, love him or hate him, most people seem to love him. He fought for a more race, less colorblind, less South Africa where everybody was free, that has been twisted and contorted and bastardized by the new political movements that want to take back land from white South Africans. They want to harm and hurt them. But President Trump is shoving the truth right into Cyril's face. The president of South Africa and JD Vance going to Munich and calling Europe back to its liberal values, the liberal values that we share in America, of free speech, of equal application, of the law, of colorblind meritocracy. Trump bringing the receipts to the White House. Never sleep on President Trump when he's got another foreign leader at the White House. What a historic moment this could be. Part of the spark to reignite Western civilization, a Western civilization renaissance. To remember who we are, to remember our greatness and to never apologize for that greatness, but instead boldly grow it, go forth and make our countries wonderful, great, free, prosperous and rich again. Nobody should be able to take that away from us. It's our history. We should own it. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Please consider joining members.charliekirk.com that's members.charliekirk. com where you can support the work of this show. Get involved, get exclusive access to content and AMAs and all kinds of things. So check it out, members.charlie kirk.com but talk to you soon.

Chip Roy (38:30)

For more on many of these stories.

Andrew Colvett (38:32)

And news you can trust, go to charliekirk. Com.