Senator Ron Johnson (12:00)

Want you to get up right now and go to the window, open it and stick your head out and yell, I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore.

Charlie Kirk (12:12)

Live shot of Elon Musk on X. Stephen Miller responds and Stephen Miller, this is why I'm in support of the big beautiful bill. And while I understand Elon's critique and I even sympathize with his analysis. You must understand there's other things at play here. Stephen Miller responds. Quote, the big beautiful bill contains three major One, the most significant border security and deportation effort in history, including the entire wall up front now with no possibility of Democrat obstruction. That's huge. Full extension expansion of the Trump tax cuts. This is what CBO scoring, not spending tax cuts. The one we campaigned on and pledged the largest welfare welfare reform in history, cutting almost $2 trillion in spending. Item one alone, border security plus deportation, makes us the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation. Let me pause here, too. What I don't think the CBO or people are recognizing is we save billions, if not tens of billions of dollars in social services as we continue mass deportations. Understand? Mass deportations saves money in hospitals, saves money in schools, saves money on infrastructure. So make no mistake, deportations are a net benefit financially and fiscally for the American homeland. Stephen Miller continues for saying those. Those do. For saying those do. Separate bills. To do separate bills. Each will require 60 votes, needing Schumer instead of 50 requirements. Reconciliation is a special process each fiscal year where you can make fiscal changes with 50 votes. That's why BBB is the vehicle for tax cuts, deportations and welfare reform. Stephen Miller continues by saying, the one wrinkle of reconciliation is you can't make discretionary cuts. This is key. Just mandatory discretionary cuts happen through a separate process known as rescissions, which we are going to do. This is the one part that I would push back on Elon a little bit, is that the reconciliation process can only go after food stamp reform or Medicaid. The bureaucracy like the Department of Education and the Department of Energy. That stuff comes up in a budgetary process or rescissions. The big beautiful bill was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters. And that's exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close. Certain libertarians in Congress who are not MAGA have their own agenda and it's not yours. We're going to hear from Senator Ron Johnson in just a moment, his concerns, and we're going to talk about the budgetary process and ask these questions out in the open. And look, I see this from both perspectives. The bottom line is we love what Elon is saying about fiscal sanity, but we're also pragmatists and the bill should pass. It's a major tax cut. That will revitalize the American economy. It still has a lot of welfare reform. I think go even further. I think we should basically scrap a lot of these programs completely. I think they're totally unnecessary in its current form. But I'm not a member of Congress and very few people agree with me. And we need to win more seats. And that is the final point, is that when you only have a two or three seat House majority, we are. When you have the same Senate majority as you do a House majority, that should be very sobering for you. That should hopefully take a step back and say, oh, okay, that doesn't put you in a maximally driver's seat. Rand Paul says, quote, kentuckians sent me here to fight the reckless debt. I will not support a $5 trillion increase to our deficit. Stephen Miller responded by saying, quote, the score Rand Paul is citing is the size of the tax cut. The bill slashing spending's almost 2 trillion. Also, why does Rand ever, why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals? There's a lot of back and forth here. We're not getting involved in the name calling here because I think there's some good natured, there's some good natured concern where people want to see a balanced budget. I get that. And the bond market gets a vote. Remember, the bond market gets a vote. All that to be said, this bill should still be passed. This bill will be a tremendous net, good for the country. Deportations, border, massive tax cuts, tax on remittances. Drill baby, drill. Huge middle class tax cut, no tax on tips. And then we need to keep the fight on, on the budgetary process and on rescissions. And we just hope it's a first step. Gentlemen, let's get real for a second. Are you frustrated with today's woke dating apps? The apps, the games, the endless swiping. It's a waste of time finding a woman who shares your values, faith, family and patriotism and feels nearly impossible. But it doesn't have to be. Selective Search, America's leading matchmaking firm is changing the game. They connect strong, successful men like you. Men who love God, love America and want a family with incredible women who share your values. These are intelligent, faith driven women who put family first and still believe in traditional values. Imagine that if you're a single conservative man in the late 30s to early 50s in Southern California. Listen up. Selective Search has an exclusive network of women ready for the real thing. Here's the best part. Their candidate program is 100% free and confidential. Some of my closest friends have used Selective Search. And let me tell you, they're meeting incredible women. This is your chance. This is not an app. It's your answer. The perfect conservative woman is out there waiting for you. Visit selectivesearch.com california today. Let the professionals introduce you to women already looking for someone like you in Southern California. Don't wait for the perfect moment. Take action now. Go to selectivesearch.com California and start building the future you deserve. And now we're gonna hear from the man himself, Senator Ron Johnson. Senator, thank you so much for taking the time. Senator, please give us your latest update on the big beautiful bill. Are you still currently a no in its current form, and if so, why?

Senator Ron Johnson (17:56)

Well, Charlie. Well, first of all, like you, I'm a big supporter of President Trump. He is a unique political figure. He is doing things that have to be done that nobody else would do. So I'm a big supporter. I want to see him succeed. But the fact of the matter is, the debate in the House, it was pretty absent of looking at the relevant figures. Pretty well pulled $1.5 trillion out of the air. Sounds like a big number, but over 10 years, it's really not even a rounding error when you're spending more than $7 trillion a year. So, again, I'm focusing on the facts and figures. That's kind of what I'm doing, is forcing the debate in the Senate. I've always agreed with Senator Thune that we really needed to do this. What we had to do had to be done in a couple different steps. It wasn't all going to get done satisfactorily in one step. And I think that's proven true. So, again, it's not too late to acknowledge that fact. Do the things that have to be done border? Yes, we have to add defense to that, but we need to sharpen our pencils on both of those. Use the good work in the House to reduce spending to the extent we can, extend current tax law, take a massive automatic tax increase off the table, provide that certainty to the economy, increase the debt ceiling for about a year to keep the pressure on, leave all those other items for a second round using fiscal year 2026 budget reconciliation. That'll give us time to go through the budget line by line, 2,600 programs in the federal government, forensically audit those. Trump and Elon Musk showed us how to do it with Doge. We need to take that Doge effort and expand it and again, just delve into the federal budget, into These programs, forensically audit them, expose them to the American public. And Charlie, I have to believe when you've gone from $4.4 trillion in 2019 to $7 trillion, there's literally hundreds of billions of dollars lurking in all that spending that if you eliminate it, nobody would even notice it other than the grifters who are sucking down that waste, fraud and abuse. But you have to do the work. And that's going to take time. That's going to take a lot of effort. And this big, beautiful bill has gone through the standard process. Exempt most programs, look at a couple, tweak them, get a CBO score, pick a number out of the air that doesn't meet the moment, and say, you've done a great job. I'm sorry. Appreciate the challenge that Speaker Johnson has, but you need to expose this. You need to sell to the American public to get him on your side. And again, you gotta do it in multiple steps. You can't do it all in one fell swoop.

Charlie Kirk (20:27)

So, Senator, I wanna put the chart you sent our team up on screen. But before I do that, the critique from the White House. They'll say that during a reconciliation process, we are not. They're not able to touch spending like in the departments. It's a mandatory versus discretionary spending. Is there any truth to that? So discretionary cuts happen through a separate process known as rescissions. What is and how does that factor into your calculus for the support or opposition to this bill?

Senator Ron Johnson (20:59)

Yeah, we have all kinds of crazy rules there, right? You can't touch Social Security, you can't touch discretionary spending. Through the reconciliation is only about mandatory. But again, remember, mandatory is way more than Social Security, Medicare and even Medicaid. There's a trillion dollars of other mandatory spending which probably should be discretionary, but they've, you know, the Muno Party has deviously transferred that into other mandatory. So it's never looked at. So. No. So you need rescission packages. I've been baffled that every week, based on what Doge has found, that we didn't just send up their weekly findings and rescind them. I don't understand why they haven't done that. They should start doing that. But again, you need the American public on your side. But what I'm talking about a budget review panel, forensic audits of every line of the budget, every program. That's going to take a lot of time, but that unlocks all of this. So you have to do the work. But you have rescission as long as we've got majorities in this White House. And by the way, you can't count on winning and having the same setup in the next Congress. This is our moment. We are mortgaging our children's future. This is our chance. We can't blow it right now. I'm sorry. The big beautiful bill blows it.

Charlie Kirk (22:10)

So Senator, here up on screen, the graph. Tell our audience the significance of this graph and the Trump team and the White House of which I'm very much supportive of them and friends with them and I still want the beautiful bill to pass. I'm supportive of that. They will say that the CBO doesn't know what they're talking about with scoring and accuracy. Please walk through our audience what exactly we're seeing on screen right now.

Senator Ron Johnson (22:33)

So the red bars are actual. Okay. And that just shows the average deficits in different terms of presidency. So you can see in Bush 1, he averaged over 8 years about $250 billion of deficits. Wish we were there. President Obama came in and averaged almost 1.3 trillion in his first term. That sparked Tea Party. I'm part of that. And you see the Tea Party's impact in terms of fiscal deficit. We literally held spending flat for about five years at about 3.5 trillion. He taken it from 2.98 up to 3.5. So Obama in his last term average deficits of 550. Trump comes in, had deal Democrats and so that average deficit went up to 810 billion for his first three years. Then Covid hit $3.1 trillion of bipartisan spending blowout. Responsible leadership should have reduced that deficit back at least below a trillion dollars. But that's not what Biden, the Democrats did. They went, they continued the spending spree. So we averaged deficits of $1.9 trillion. And all of my analysis of this is based on CBO's 10 year projection. I'm not a big fan of CBO. I'm not a big fan of their static scoring, that kind of stuff. But the general direction of spending and revenue is pretty accurate. And so what the last 3 bar show is on a 4 year average rolling basis, our deficit. We're not reducing the deficit curve down. We're going from about $1.9 trillion. I guess accepting $1.9 trillion deficits is the new normal. And ramping that up to over $2.5 trillion, averaging $2.2 trillion over the next 10 years, completely unacceptable. Now you can argue about how, how CBO is going to score this thing again. Whether you tweak those bars a little bit higher, a little bit lower. The trajectory is undeniable. And I would argue that this is probably a rosy scenario because there's interest rate risk, 1% increase in interest rates, and we're seeing that happen in the bond market that add $4 trillion, $400 billion to each one of those lines. They're assuming again, if you eliminate, if you extend current tax law, don't have that automatic tax increase. Well, from those estimates it takes about $4 trillion away. Now you can argue, and I would, that you're not going to get that 4 trillion because you're going to harm economic growth. Are you going to be able to replace it? I used GROK this morning and I said, okay, what happens if we grow at 5% nominal growth? That's 3% real economic growth, real GDP growth and 2% inflation, by the way, for the last 20 years we've only experienced 2% average growth. So let's say we grow 3 and we maintain that 17.1% revenues percent of GDP over 10 years. That only gains us a half a trillion dollars. So we're not making it up. Okay, so there's all kinds of risk. I think unfortunately that's probably a rosy scenario. And 1.5 trillion spread out over 10 years, $150 billion. Add to that more than $300 billion of new spending on defense and border. That's not even a 1.3% cut over the 10 year period. It's a rounding error. It's just not meeting the moment. They've done some good work, but it's not serious effort.

Charlie Kirk (25:54)

So Senator, what concretely is your ask and who in the Senate is with you in this coalition as to what would be an acceptable outcome here? As you know, we can't let perfect be the enemy of good. And so I know you mentioned about going through certain programs and auditing and vetting them, but what are three or four specific ideas or examples that you have ideas to try to broker because we do need to pass. There's so much good in this bill and I know that you will agree with that, Senator, from border security, deportations to remittances to no tax on tips, what is your proposal of three or four specific cuts structurally so that you can be satisfied and those of us that are fiscal hawks can also be satisfied while also getting this bill passed?

Senator Ron Johnson (26:42)

Well, first of all, I know we're not going to meet the moment with one bill. We won't, you know, the House didn't do it. We won't if we quick rush this thing through. So we've got to split this up. Focus on the areas of agreement. Border defense. Take the spending reductions. The House has given us that they've agreed to extend current tax law. Take the automatic tax increase off the table. That was a blunder in the Tax Cut and Jobs Act. We should have scored that in current policy. We weren't smart enough to do that. Increase the debt ceiling for about a year. Keep the pressure on. I've got to convince President Trump that is to his advantage. He wants to balance the budget. That's what he said. Well, we're not even coming close to putting ourselves on a path to balance the budget. He needs that leverage as well. We'll never default on the debt ever. We've got more than enough revenue to service our debt. We will increase the debt ceiling, but. But we ought to do it in increments to keep the pressure on. So this has got to be at least a two part process. Fiscal year 2025 reconciliation process. Do that now. Again, we skinny this thing down. Focus on the areas of agreement that we can do by July 4, then start doing the work. And Charlie, rather than the problem we're having is the same old way. Give me three things that'll solve the problem. Three things won't. You've got to literally go through thousands of lines of budget. You got to go through thousands of. Of programs. Do the forensic audit like Doge did and expose it. Get the American people on the side. Take the time to do the work, but also to win public support for what you're doing rather than jam something through, not have a good response when the Democrats falsely attack it. Again, we're just, we're blowing this. We're blowing it. We didn't take the time. We're not making the arguments. I'm sorry. It's a slogan. It's a slogan. We need substance. We're only going to solve this with substance, with facts and with figures. And, and so far the discussion has been largely void of facts and figures. I'm forcing facts and figures to the forefront here.

Charlie Kirk (28:31)

So, and I apologize, Senator, if you mentioned this, I just, I might be confusing something else. Stephen Miller would say a separate bill would. Then each would require 60 votes. Is that correct? One minute remaining, Senator.

Senator Ron Johnson (28:42)

No, we've got budget reconciliation for fiscal year 2026. We should already have a fiscal 2026 budget on the table. We could already be in that reconciliation process. We're still working off of fiscal year 2025. So. No, we've each one of each budget reconciliation can literally have three bills, one for spending, one for revenue, one for the.

Charlie Kirk (29:00)

Yeah, this is. And I said, I know you got a dash. This is what drives me the most crazy about DC Is two guys I love, Ron Johnson and Stephen Miller. We're just talking past each other, right? And it's just because now the audience is all confused. So Stephen Miller saying you need 60 votes, you're saying, not in this land of.

Senator Ron Johnson (29:18)

I love Stephen Miller. He's simply wrong on this one. He's simply wrong again.

Charlie Kirk (29:22)

And I love Steve. I don't know nearly enough. And I don't know nearly enough. It's just this is the, this is the type of thing that drives me and my audience mad because we're like, we can't even agree on the structural, you know, technicality of it, let alone all the cuts. Senator, thank you so much for your time. We'll be watching very closely. Senator, thank you.

Senator Ron Johnson (29:40)

Take care. Bye.

Charlie Kirk (29:41)

I want your thoughts, everybody in the audience. Freedomarliekirk.com should we pass the big, beautiful bill in its current form? Do you think that Senator Johnson's approach is correct? We do have a risk of maybe not passing anything at all. Please email me freedomarliekirk.com I want to hear from you directly and right now, drop what you're doing. Freedomcharlic.com I read every single email and I'm in touch with the White House. I'm in touch with a lot of folks there with JD and all that. And I will be relaying what you guys email me here. Freedomarliekirk.com I want to hear from you. I want to know the why. I want to tell you guys about why Refi. Why Refi is one of our best supporters at Turning Point usa. They're supporting our Young Women's Leadership Summit, our Student Action Summit. Private student loan debt in America totals about $300 billion. But 45 billion of that is labeled as distressed. Why Refi does not care what your credit score is. They can reduce your monthly payment and they guarantee interest rates under 6%, ensuring affordability and financial relief. Why Refi can save you thousands of dollars by refinancing and even lowering your total cost. You can finally take control of your student loan situation with a plan that works for your monthly budget. Why Refi refinances distressed and defaulted private student loans, which are different from federal loans. Cred. Go to yrefi.com you can read testimonials from other people who have been where you are how they've escaped. And now you can see what their monthly payments were versus what they are now. Go to yrefi.com Bad credit is accepted. That is yrefy.com do you have a co borrower? Yrefi can get them released from the loan. You can give mom or dad a break. Call 888 yrefi34 or log on to yrefy.com may not be available in all 50 states. Go to yrefi.com that is whyrefi.com okay, a lot of things I want to hit here, the first of which I just want to continue on one of my big frustrations and I'm trying to. I'm putting them on a group text together. I'm putting Ron Johnson and Stephen Miller in a group chat together. Because of all the stuff that I deal with in politics, I don't mind disagreement. Disagreement is fun. My life, I live in disagreement. I don't care if you disagree with me. That's, that's not that important. In fact, I think it's healthy and it makes me stronger. And hopefully it makes you stronger. What drives me nuts is when we are debating something that should be agreed upon, presuppositions, when the presupposition itself, the foundational truth is like, well, no, we can't do this or we can't do that, well, then everything from that point is completely irrelevant. The second, third, fourth, fifth, fifth, sixth, seventh, then iteration of facts are incomplete. We must get back to first principles and define our terms. So is it clear? Do if we go to two bills, do we though then need 60 votes? Very simple question. If we go to two bills, do we need 60 votes in? Stephen Miller says yes, who I think is the greatest, by the way? Stephen Miller is like total rock star. Ron John says no. Getting an answer that would be very helpful and important to getting closer towards an inevitable conclusion of how to proceed. And I'm still in support of passing this big, beautiful bill. Why? Well, one of the main reasons why I'm so in support of it is because of the slim majority. We have to factor in the slim House majority. And it's very much on President Trump's mind. It's very much on his team's mind. His team's been doing a great job trying to usher this through. It's not an easy job because you know why? You have, Basically, you have 55 members of Congress in the House that if they get five friends together, they can kill a bill. You got Don Bacon, you got Lawler, I like Lawler. He's a good guy. You've got all these guys that get in a room together and one of them has a disagreement and the bill gets collapsed. And I think we need to understand that. I think we need to have the contextualization there and we need to try to win more seats, not less seats. And I think there's a lot of promises in this bill that we need to deliver on. If we want more deportations, we gotta pass this bill. If we want permanent border security, we have to pass this bill. If we want tax on remittances, we have to pass this bill. If we want those Trump baby bonus accounts. One of my favorite things that's happening, it's in the one big, beautiful bill and one of the other things that I wish would be happening again. I'm happy to air Ron Johnson's complaints and his criticisms. And I think Ron Johnson's great and I've worked well with him for well over a decade. He was one of the first people ever to support and speak at Turning Point usa. So Ron Johnson is someone that I will defend to my last breath. I wish a lot more of this was happening in a closed room. What needs to happen is a private gladiatorial match of Ron Johnson, Rand Paul, Sorry, Ron Johnson, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, all of them in a room, White House staff, no devices, put it in a skiff and let the screaming happen. I will. I will cater lunch. I will bring you in N Out Burger from Arizona. People would show up if I brought in N Out Burger. For the record, I will cater and broker this lunch. We gotta get this thing sorted out because there is so much good stuff in this bill. And I don't think that the conservative movement is internalizing all the wins here in this bill. Enough. I don't. This is the greatest welfare reform in history. We got no tax on tips. No tax on tips is a major. Promises made, promises kept. And you must also hold two things equally in the hand. On the other side, if we do not balance the budget, we're gonna have some problems. Big problems. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us. As always, freedomarliekirk.com thanks so much for listening and God bless. For more on many of these stories.

Senator Ron Johnson (35:16)

And news you can Trust, go to charliekirk.com.