Rudy Giuliani (26:00)
There are many more affidavits here. I'd like to read them all to you, but I don't have the time. You should have had the time and energy to go look for them. That's your job. Like it's my job to defend the president and to represent the president. It's your job to read these things and not falsely report that there's no evidence. Do you know how many affidavits we have in the Michigan case? 220 affidavits. They're not all public, but eight of them are. Four affiants here. Those are people who give affidavits, report an incident that under any other circumstances would have been on the front page of all your newspapers if it didn't involve the hatred that you have, irrational, pathological hatred that you have for the president. What they swear to is that at 4:30 in the morning, a truck pulled up to the Detroit center where they were counting ballots. The people thought it was food, so they all ran to the truck. Wasn't food. It was thousands and thousands of ballots. And the ballots were in garbage cans, they were in paper bags, they were in cardboard boxes and they were taken into the center. They were put on a number of tables. At that time, they thought all the Republican inspectors had left. All but two had. And an employee of Dominion, who we will address a little bit later. Dominion. And here's what they jointly swear to that. Every ballot that they could see, every thing they could hear, these were ballots for Biden. When they saw a ballot, these were ballots only for Biden, meaning there was no down ticket, just Biden. Many of them didn't have anything on the outer envelope, because these ballots were produced very quickly, very swiftly, and they're estimated to be a minimum of 60,000, maximum of 100,000. Many of them were triple counted, which means they were put into the counting machine this way. Once, twice, three times. I didn't see that. I don't know that. But for the fact that three American citizens are willing to swear to it, and we're not going to let them go to court and do that, we're going to let this election go by when there are in this case, 60 witnesses that can prove what I'm saying to you and other acts of fraud in Michigan. I mean, what's happened to this country, if we're going to let that happen, what happened to this country, if we're going to cover that up? We let Al Gore carry on an election dispute longer than this one has been going on for one state and for chads. This happened in Pennsylvania. It happened in Michigan. Michigan, probably right. Now, if I count up the affidavits, just one case alone, Trump v. Benson, a case that we dismissed today because that case was attempting to get the Wayne County Board of Supervisors to decertify. Well, they did. They decertified. That case has 100 affidavits. And the 100 affidavits show essentially what I've talked to you about, counting ballots, improperly counting them three and four times, having people vote three and four times, changing and backdating ballots to the point of at least 300,000 illegitimate ballots that we can specifically identify. The margin in Michigan was 146,121. And these ballots were all cast basically in Detroit that Biden won 80, 20. So you see a change as a result of the election in Michigan, if you take out Wayne County. So it's a very significant case that is being raised in the case of Constantino versus the City of Detroit, not by us, but by an individual plaintiff. We are helping and assisting in that case, however, and you can find all the affidavits that you want filed in that case, and you can find out they're not just allegations, they're allegations supported by sworn testimony, which is A lot better than Joe Biden has ever done on anything. He doesn't answer questions, much less give you sworn affidavits. Wisconsin, Wisconsin had a very small margin, 20,544 last time I looked in Wisconsin, without going into great detail, very similar plan. Republicans shut out in the city of Milwaukee and also in Madison, Republicans almost uniformly shut out from the absentee process. Not allowed to inspect, not allowed to look at the ballots. We have in Milwaukee and in the state of Wisconsin, a much stricter law. Wisconsin doesn't allow mail in ballot. They didn't buy into the big mail in ballot situation. Wisconsin, when you look at their constitution, almost seems to not like absentee ballots. They state it's not a right, a privilege. And they have very, very strict procedures. And the strict procedure says that you can't be given an absentee ballot. You have to personally apply for it. It's illegal basically to solicit a vote. And they have actually many reasons for it. That probably goes back to their, their progressive days. When I say progressive, I mean late 19th century, early 20th century progressive, when that really meant progressives not retrogressive. So there are 60,000 ballots in Milwaukee county and 40,000 ballots in Madison that as far as we can tell, and this is why we've, we're auditing because we have very good information the numbers are going to come out about here that don't have applications under the law of the state of Wisconsin. Already decided if there's no application for an absentee ballot, the absentee ballot is thrown away. This all happened in two places in Wisconsin. Didn't happen in northern Wisconsin. Didn't happen in Republican Wisconsin. Didn't happen in neutral Wisconsin where there are equal number of Republicans and Democrats. It happened in a place where the vote was 75, 80% for the Democrat. You take away any number of those and that 20,000 lead disappears. In other words, if you count the lawful votes, Trump won Wisconsin by a good margin. Indeed, if you count the lawful votes in Pennsylvania, he won it by about 300,000 votes. Also in the, in the lawsuit filed in Wisconsin, which is really a petition because of their procedures, there were no, no inspectors provided for the count of the illegal ballots. There were numerous backdated ballots. We're just counting them now. Run over into the thousands. And there were many precincts in which there was an overvote. Now let me explain to you what an overvote is, which is something you should have explained to the American people because it's about the clearest circumstantial evidence of massive fraud that you can have an overvote is if 200% of the people who are registered in a district vote. Think about that. 200% of the registered voters in a district vote. What does that mean? That means somebody voted twice. That means somebody who's not entitled to vote, voted and illegal. A person from another city or state, a person who's not registered. But what it means is that those are illegitimate votes. You don't have an overvote of 200% or 300%. You don't have an overvote of 100%. Most, most precincts don't have 100% turnout. In fact, classically, it's considered to be an overvote if you go over 80%. Well, in Michigan and Wisconsin, we have overvotes in numerous precincts of 150%, 200% and 300%. One of the reasons why the two Republicans did not certify in Wayne, Michigan, Wayne County, Michigan, is because the overvote was so high, monstrously high, in about 2/3 of the precincts in the city of Detroit, which means magically two and three times the number of registered voters turned out to vote. In fact, we have precincts in which two times the number of people who live there, including children, voted. That's absurd. The frustration of this is what I'm describing to you is a massive fraud. It isn't a little teeny one. It isn't, you know, 100 votes switched here or there. Georgia, we're about to file a major lawsuit in Georgia that'll be filed probably tomorrow. I don't need to go through it. Virtually the same things I've told you before, very. In the city of Atlanta, Republicans were not allowed to watch the absentee mail in ballot process inspections completely cast aside. And we have numerous double voters. We have numerous out of state voters. And we have specific evidence of intimidation and changes of vote that'll all be in the lawsuit that comes out tomorrow. Arizona is a, is a state that we're looking at very, very carefully. I would say we're probably going to bring a lawsuit in Arizona. More than probably, I think we are going to bring a lawsuit in Arizona. We're still collecting that evidence. And the state that we're looking at that would surprise you is we have very, very significant amount of fraud allegations in the state of New Mexico, which. And we have a significant number of allegations in the state of Virginia. I don't know yet whether the number in Virginia will reach a number that can turn the Election. In the states that we have indicated in red, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada and Arizona, we more than double the number of votes needed to overturn the election in terms of provable illegal ballots. All you got to do to find out if I'm misleading you at all is to look at the lawsuits, look what's alleged, look at the affidavits. Maybe we can supply more affidavits. In order to do it, I have to get permission from the people. But in the materials I have here, there are at least 10 that come from citizens. We have a thousand at least, and we're getting more every day. And there are other aspects of this fraud that at this point I really can't reveal. This is really enough. It's enough to overturn any election. It's disgraceful what happened. And I'll conclude by asking you to just think about this for a minute. What happened on the morning of November 3rd when they were going to count this new kind of ballot, this mail in ballot? Did every Democrat leader in Pennsylvania and in Michigan and in Wisconsin and in Georgia and in Nevada and in Arizona, they all wake up and all separately have the same idea? Do they all separately have the idea that we are going to, we're going to put Republican inspectors in pens, we're not going to let them look at mail in or absentee ballots. They all independently come up with that, like just by coincidence, they say, hey, you know, we're going to put, we're going to put the Republicans in pens and corrals. We're going to do it in Pittsburgh, we're going to do it in Philadelphia, we're going to do it in Detroit, we're going to put, we're going to do it in Milwaukee, we're going to do it in Las Vegas. Can I do it in Phoenix? What did I miss? Oh, we're going to do it in Atlanta. Or isn't the logical conclusion that I think any jury would accept as they heard this evidence that somebody had this plan, maybe that was always the plan to do this very, very questionable form of voting which has been criticized by President Carter, by Secretary Baker, by most experts on election reform? I think the logical conclusion is this is a common plan, a common scheme. It comes right directly from the Democrat Party and it comes from the candidate. Clearly that's the reason why Hillary Clinton said, don't concede even if you're losing. That's the reason we had a Freudian slip by the candidate and he said he had the best voter fraud team in the country. That's the reason why he probably didn't have to go out and campaign. He had to have known what they were going to do. This had to be planned in advance. I'm kind of checking. Did they go, you know, to the same contractor to get the corrals to put the Republicans in? And this is a disgraceful thing that was done in this country. Probably not much more disgraceful than the things these people did in office, which you didn't and don't bother to cover and you conceal from the American people. But we let this happen. You know, we use largely a Venezuelan voting machine, in essence, to count our vote. We let this happen. We're going to become Venezuela. We cannot let this happen to us. We cannot allow these crooks, because that's what they are, to steal an election from the American people. They elected Donald Trump. They didn't elect Joe Biden. Joe Biden is in the lead because of the fraudulent ballots, the illegal ballots that were produced and that were allowed to be used after the election was over. Give us an opportunity to prove it in court and we will. Now, I'm going to ask Sidney Powell to describe to you what we can describe about another totally outrageous situation. I don't think most Americans know that our ballots get calculated, many of them outside the United States, and are completely open to hacking, completely open to change, and it's being done by a company that specializes in voter fraud. I'll let Sydney describe that to you.