C (4:28)

After watching their blue state bailout passed the Senate yesterday along party lines through the reconciliation process, which only requires a simple majority, this is their new plan to permanently rig election rules in their favor. It was all laid out in a CNN opinion piece last week. They're calling it democracy reconciliation, but with universal mail in voting and banana republic atrocities like ballot harvesting nationwide, HR1 is the opposite of democracy. It must be stopped.

A (4:59)

That's Steve Hilton from Fox News. And so Joe Manchin could potentially entertain a reconciliation vote to get HR1 pass. It would also take Kyrsten Sinema from Arizona. And Senator Sinema has been a total wild card. She is the closest thing to a true independent that we are seeing in the United States Senate. And she is not dumb. She represents a very center right state and she ran as a moderate. And unlike Joe Biden, she's somewhat in the middle. I mean she's all over the place sometimes. She's doing the wackiest thing you could possibly imagine. The left can't stand her right now. I gotta give her, I gotta give her praise. She's not towing the absolute Democrat party line. And so the two people that are basically running Washington D.C. right now, it's not Schumer, it's not Pelosi, it's not McConnell, it's not McCarthy, it's Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin. They're basically running Washington and by doing so they are commanding at least somewhat more of a centrist, focused focus and a slower process of how we're passing bills. So HR1 is a fundamental change in the way we do elections. And Joe Manchin is enjoying every possible piece of leverage he has over his fellow Democrats. Joe Manchin is also told Axios that he'll block Joe Biden's next big package, 2 trillion to $4 trillion for climate and infrastructure if Republicans are not included. Mansion says that with just a few concessions it would have been possible to get some Republicans on the Chinese coronavirus relief package that passed the Senate this weekend on a party line vote. So basically Joe Manchin runs the entire United States Senate. So the question is, will he break on HR1? And so all of the public pressure that many of you are asking where do we put our attention on it should be on praising and supporting Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin to not break the filibuster and not go into reconciliation, which is just a simple majority vote to pass HR1. Yes, H R1 is that big of a deal because we lost Georgia because 70000 Trump supporters did not show up in Georgia to support Lefler and to support Perdue, two people that I understand were not the most animating candidates. Warnock and Ossoff put the United States senate into a 5050 tie. And now basically the Democrats are at risk of putting forward their entire agenda and fundamentally changing and transform country permanently. The only thing that stands in their way is two Democrat senators that represent Republican states. West Virginia and Arizona. Arizona state. I know very, very well Kyrsten Sinema wants to be a senator for quite some time. And she's going to be. She's doing a good job of it. If Kyrsten Sinema ran for election today, she would win the 60% of the vote, more so than any other Republican in the state. She's probably the most popular politician in Arizona. And here I am a grassroots constitutional conservative and I think I have mentioned Kyrsten Sinema on my program positively for the last couple weeks. Kyrsten Sinema has more courage than Jeff Flake ever did. Now obviously I disagree with Kyrsten Sinema on border policy and abortion and many other important issues. And the transgender issue I'm sure we don't agree on and we'll get to that one in a second. But insofar that Kyrsten Sinema is trying to slow down the Democrat power grab of our country, it's all we got. It's all we have. And if we're going to have Democrats that are willing to at least respect their constituents a little bit, then they should be applauded and they should be praised. Whereas you have Mitt Romney, who always looks at an opportunity to pander to Democrats. You have Kyrsten Sinema, who's now looking for an opportunity to slow down Democrats. That takes a lot of courage. By the way, inner Democrat party fights have been limited in recent years and Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin having the courage and yes, it is courage to do what they are doing and they're benefiting from it because they become more important. I'm not gonna all of a sudden say they're on some sort of moral crusade here, but it takes courage nonetheless. But the intention is completely irrelevant as to whether or not it takes moral courage because they are recipient of massive backlash and pressure and opposition within their own party, and their courage needs to be noted. All that stands between US and passing HR1, which is changing elections permanently and forever and for the worse. You think this last election was bad? Wait till you see what HR1 would do. Basically, it's all up to Cinema and Mansion. So we all know about conservatives getting kicked off social media.

E (10:16)

Why exactly are we choosing to give all those big tech companies all of our personal data? Now is the time to take a stand. Protect your personal data from big tech with a VPN that I trust for my online protection. ExpressVPN. You see, every device, whether you're on your phone, laptop or television, has a unique string of numbers. It's called an IP address. When you search for stuff, watch videos,

A (10:38)

or even click a link, big tech

E (10:40)

companies can use that IP address to track all your activity and tie it back to you. When I use ExpressVPN, my connection gets rerouted through their secure, encrypted servers. So these companies can never see my IP address at all. My Internet activity becomes anonymized and my network data is encrypted. The best part is you don't need to be tech savvy at all to use ExpressVPN. Just download the app on your phone or computer, tap one button and you're protected. Protect your Internet activity with the VPN that I use every single day. Visit expressvpn.com Charlie to get three extra months free or a one year package that's E X P-R-E-S-S VPN.com Charlie to get three extra Months free. Expressvpn.com Charlie

A (11:29)

I have been a vocal critic against the transgender craze of the last couple years went to University of, I think it's called Indiana University of Pennsylvania. It's an interesting name right outside of Pittsburgh. I spoke there, I think, a year and a half, two years ago, wearing a shirt that said there are only two genders. I was not very well received by the activist class. But it's true. There are only two genders, man and woman. Science tells us this. The left says trust the science, but they don't listen to that when it comes to gender norms. Now, there is a serious psychological and mental condition called gender dysphoria. A lot of people suffer from this where they think they are something other than what they really are. And something that we have always been warning about is how transgender people who are suffering from the mental condition, gender dysphoria, and they should be given compassion and they should be given treatment to potentially become predators towards young children in restrooms or locker rooms. So a man who thinks he is a woman by the name of Alec Vid Menon, I might have pronounced it. I don't mean any offense by the pronunciation, but what he said, I'm going to give a disclaimer before I read this on the air because it's so dark, it is so unspeakably evil. The fact that he still has a social media account and Donald Trump doesn't is outrageous. So he says, quote, these days, the narrative is that transgender people will come into bathrooms and abuse little girls. The supposed purity of the victims has remained stagnant. There are no little princesses. Little girls are also kinky. Your kids aren't as straight and as narrow as you think. This is Alek Vide Menon. So the first and most obvious question to Alek is, how do you know that little girls are also kinky? How do you know little girls aren't as straight and as narrow as you think? Is there a crime you'd like to confess to publicly, Alec? Is there some activity that you'd like to tell us about now that you have put this on social media publicly? Basically, what Alec Vid Menon has admitted on social media is that he has some insight into being a child predator that we're not aware of. He being a transgender activist. And he is not just some random Twitter account. He is a well followed published transgender activist with over 615,000 Instagram followers, substantial Twitter following. This is not just some fringe guy. This is someone that has written about favorably in Vogue, amongst many other publications. Written about favorably in Us Weekly, written about favorably in the Advocate, written About favorably in Teen Vogue, written about favorably in yahoo news in CNN.com he got a puff piece last week. Time for a new beauty paradigm. So CNN and Vogue are now platforming a man who says, quote, there are no little princesses. Little girls are also kinky. Your kids aren't as straight and narrow as you think. He has received no criticism from the press, no backlash from the supposed transgender community. Basically making the argument that little kids want to be preyed on. Little kids want to be played with little girls. They want us men to come into their locker rooms and their bathrooms. They're more open minded to become victims of sexual abuse than you might think, you backwards person who believes that little children should be protected. It's right there on social media. The supposed purity of the victims has remained stagnant. There are no little princesses. Little girls are also kinky. Your kids aren't as straight and narrow as you think. Alec Vide Menon, a mentally ill person who is now publicly trying to normalize child predators. Maybe he is one because he says he knows this personally. This is where the transgender movement is headed. And Republicans that are just trying to play along and not pick the fights when they matter, they're going to validate this. So I kind of am obligated to get into this story right now, which is the story of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. So I want to read this tweet here from Ben Goldsmith. And behind by no means an expert on the British monarchy. A lot of respect for the tradition and all of that, a lot of great friends in London and Great Britain. It's just not a primary concern of mine. And so I want to read from Ben Goldsmith's tweet, which I thought was terrific. The narrative being promoted by Meghan, friends of Meghan and the leftist mainstream media and everyone else who hates the royal family and British traditions generally, is that the royal couple were driven out of Britain because of snobbery and racism. This just isn't true. The British tabloid press and the British publicly initially adored the idea that a glamorous star from suits was marrying into the royal family and got terribly excited by the novelty of their royal wedding in the chapel of Windsor Castle. They only started going off Meghan when they realized she was a pushy, ungrateful, entitled, gag inducingly, politically correct Hollywood gold digger who just gone and hitched herself up to Britain's favorite cheeky chappy warrior prince and turned him into an emasculated, humorless husk of his for himself. It's actually from James Delingpole, who I believe writes for Breitbart, amongst other places, and he interviewed me when we were in London for our campus tour. Very good guy. And so there's a lot of people that are kind of dissecting the interview yesterday. There's a lot of people that are going through the entire thing. I think just the broader question about this whole saga is are we really now going to blame racism for the alleged oppressed life of Meghan Markle? Is that. Is that going to be the consensus point? Her narrative is now, basically, I am going to play a victim while I was literally admitted into the royal family. And based on my memory, and I'm sure we could find endless amounts of media coverage that reinforced this of. That was one of the most positive media events of the last couple decades that I can. I could think of. And for her to now accuse the entire royal family of racism with no specifics whatsoever, no names, no times, no events, but it fits the narrative. And she knows now she can go make a bunch of money, which she probably made upwards of $7 million to do that interview, because she now is playing the part of what everyone wants, which is, I've seen the inner workings of a powerful institution, and let me tell you, at the highest levels of ancestral aristocracy, they're racist. And we must change everything. That's the narrative. The narrative that she is now playing is confirmation bias of what Oprah herself has been trying to push on the American people. Now, I know far more about Oprah Winfrey than about Meghan Markle. Oprah Winfrey. The fact that Oprah tolerated this whole conversation is so unbelievably disappointing. And I'll get to that. But first, I want to play this tape right here of Meghan Markle saying this, making the claim that there were racist remarks against her child's skin color, but she won't say who said it because she's doing maybe a Jussie Smollett thing. Play cut eight.

F (20:17)

And also concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he's born. That was relayed to me from Harry. Those were conversations that family had with him if he were too

A (20:30)

brown, that

F (20:32)

that would be a problem. Are you saying that I wasn't able to follow up with why, but that if that's the assumption you're making, I think that feels like a pretty safe one.

A (20:41)

Feels. Feels like a safe one. Megan, you are now allowing your feels feelings, I guess I should say, to dictate an accusation of a family that largely by all evidence Available. Embraced you. What an unbelievably ungrateful person you are. No gratitude. Perfect leftist. No gratitude. Now Piers Morgan, who's all over the place, Piers Morgan is like Lindsey Graham. Some days Piers Morgan is excellent. Other days he's just completely off the reservation. So let's go to cut nine of Piers Morgan reacting to this clip, which I think is Piers Morgan at his best. Play Cut nine.

B (21:24)

Okay, well, who said that? Let's have a name. Rather allowing everyone to think that it could be anyone in the palace. It could be the queen, Prince Philip. It could be Charles. It could be Camilla. It could be any of them. Let's have a name. If somebody did say this in a racist, derogatory way, and that would clearly be completely unacceptable and outrageous. But I wonder, who is that person? What was that conversation? What was the context they said it in? Because until we know the answers to all these questions, we have a whole family being labeled as basically racist.

A (21:53)

Yeah, I don't think anyone said it. I think she's making it up like Jussie Smollett. I think somebody said something completely different in a different category and she's using it now to go make people feel sorry for her. Now. What bothers me the most about all this is actually not Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. We know Prince Harry is a metrosexual beta male and really is lacking in almost all testosterone. And we know that Meghan Markle is a tradition destroying leftist who's self indulgent. We know that that's not exactly breaking news. What bothers me the most is the third person in this interview. That's what bothers me. What bothers me is Oprah. Oprah has lived the American dream. Oprah started from nothing, less than nothing. Oprah has gone through some legitimate trials in her life. Oprah has. She worked harder than any other television host. Throughout the 90s and early 2000s, Oprah had some of the most consequential interviews of the last 25 years. Oprah is a billionaire black woman. Oprah was always about self improvement, independence, empowerment, rising above your circumstances, being a victor, not a victim. Oprah had an entire following of mostly suburban women believing in themselves, believing in the idea of applied action. And yes, black American women followed her in huge numbers. She was leading a charge of trying to say that there might be troubles around you. Work harder, play by the rules. She had Harpo Productions. Oprah has a place in Hawaii. Oprah has a place in Santa Barbara. Oprah has a place ever. She is the richest Black woman in the world. And yet I have to go watch Oprah Winfrey, even tolerate, even entertain this idea that racism exists as a barrier to human success. Only in America is it possible for Oprah Winfrey to succeed. Only in America. And yet Oprah Winfrey creates this forum of oppression Olympics. She creates this framework of where we're now going to allow you to go complain professionally, where the real Oprah Winfrey, the Oprah Winfrey that I know, is still out there somewhere and has been suppressed into this angry and bitter person. The real Oprah Winfrey, the 1995 Oprah Winfrey that used to be just phenomenal, the Oprah Winfrey that interviewed Donald Trump, the Oprah Winfrey that gave away cars for fun, the Oprah Winfrey that was always about success. You know how Oprah would have handled that interview in the 1990s? Oprah would have said, said, okay, Megan, you're saying this. Are you really trying to say people should feel sorry for you right now with the privilege, with the wealth that you obviously have? Are you trying to say that black women can't succeed? Obviously, I've succeeded. Instead, she validated the concern. Oprah Winfrey said last summer, white people don't understand that whiteness itself gets you through life in ways that blackness cannot. Oprah Winfrey more so than the metrosexual beta male Prince Harry or the leftist Meghan Markle, forget about those people. Oprah should be the focus of this entire thing. Oprah has lived the story of what it means to be an American entrepreneur, to have grit, to have hustle, to earn your success. And Oprah's entire platform now is dedicated to around the validation of victimhood. She didn't even press the issue. She should have been obligated to challenge such a controversial claim. The old Oprah would have done that. Yet Oprah has become this bitter, angry, and dare I say, destructive force in the American media landscape. And as someone who was born and raised in Chicago, she had all of her empire in Chicago. And I was raised with the story of Oprah Winfrey rising above her circumstances and being a victor. Oprah Winfrey has too much power, too much wealth and too much influence to be so reckless and irresponsible. And it is such an unbelievable disappointment, an unspeakable disappointment, because now millions of other young black women are watching this. Meanwhile, what's the setting of the interview? The setting is likely at either Oprah's or Prince Harry's or Meghan Markle's estate somewhere in Santa Barbara, somewhere It's. You could just tell by the short aesthetic of the video clips I have seen that these people were not roughing it in Compton. It's not exactly. It was like Montecito or something like that. And so what is this? What is the subconscious signal that is being sent from that entire travesty that happened? The signal is this, blame other people for your problems. Racism has infected every single institution. And despite any sort of success that Oprah might have accomplished, she's still oppressed.

E (27:32)

Free email services like Gmail and Yahoo are never actually free. You pay with your privacy. And since those companies have access to every email you send and receive, Big tech can then sell your data to the highest bidder. We all know about Google and Yahoo. They have access to all of your sensitive information. A lot of people ask, they say, how can I do email? Right. That's why I want to talk to you about Start Mail. Start Mail keeps all email private. Not even Big Brother can snoop around your email. Start Mail also prevents government agencies from spying on you. With Start Mail, deleted means deleted. When you delete an email, it's gone forever. And Start Mail uses their own servers, not Amazon's, which means they can't be

A (28:15)

put out of business.

E (28:17)

Unlike Parlor, Start Mail is also backed by the most stringent privacy laws in the world. So you get unlimited anonymous aliases. This feature protects your main email address from spam and phishing attacks. I don't trust Big Tech and neither should you. Start securing your email privacy with StartMail. Go to startmail.com Kirk that's start with a T. That's S-T-A-R-T mail.com Kirk For 50% off your first order, startmail.com Kirk

A (28:51)

let's go to cut one. President Trump, back in the time machine. He warned us about Meghan Markle. Cut one.

F (28:57)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle chimed in on the US election and essentially encouraged people to vote for Joe Biden. Want to get your reaction to that?

D (29:07)

I'm not a fan of hers and I would say this, and she probably has heard that, but. But I wish a lot of luck to Harry because he's going to need it.

A (29:25)

It's just perfect. And now this is the one year anniversary of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who's a pathological liar who has failed upwards his entire career, saying this one year ago, cut 10.

B (29:40)

Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks.

C (29:45)

You're sure of it because people are

A (29:47)

listening really closely to this right now.

B (29:49)

People should not Be walking. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask when you're in the middle of an outbreak. Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.

A (30:09)

So this guy is still allowed at the highest levels of government. One thing that I just wish Donald Trump would have done, and I think it was a missed opportunity, is fire this guy and fire him publicly last April after the lies, the treachery, the arrogance, quite honestly, the resentment that he has for the country and for actual science. Dr. Anthony Fauci is a pathological liar. I also want to get to a cut here. Let's go to cut seven. Karl Rove talks about how 6% of all the people that are released into the United States have the Chinese coronavirus. I thought Joe Biden said that we're going to do everything we can to stop the virus. Cut seven.

B (30:56)

Now they're being released into the United States. And you may have read three days ago, the bus station, what's in Brownsville, Texas. The dhs, the Department of Home Homeland Security drops them off at the Greyhound bus station in Brownsville. The city of Brownsville has to pick up the tab for trade for, for testing them for Covid. Six percent of them are Covid. And they get on the buses.

A (31:21)

6%. So we just bring in the virus into the country. And so the, the Democrats and Joe Biden are perfectly okay with closing schools, closing businesses, but they want borders wide open. If you're bringing drugs, the Chinese coronavirus, or sex trafficking children, the Biden administration has no concern whatsoever. Come on in the borders. A suggestion. But if you want to educate your kids, if you want to open your laundromat, if you want to serve breakfast, open your coffee shop, they will shut you down at all costs. They will come and arrest you. The Biden administration wants closed schools and open borders and the migrant detention facilities, which is a very loose and generous definition. They are open at 100% capacity. And a point that I think is really important to make is the rich kids school. The rich kids, they're in school, they're getting private tutors. Private schools are open. Working class, closed, poor kids, they are forced to open up their laptop, if they have one, and go on Zoom and Skype. And there are millions of kids that have just disappeared. Millions of kids have not checked into school at all in the last nine months. Millions. They're just calling it a lost generation. Now. What are those kids going to do, get involved in drugs, get involved in gangs, more likely to go to prison. The wealth and income inequality that the Democrats always complain about, they are creating it through school closures and through open borders. Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden and Gavin Newsom and J.B. pritzker's kids and grandkids are in school. They're doing just fine. But poor kids, poor families, their kids are forced to stay at home, not get any sort of educational instruction. That's the America that Democrats are creating. Now. Republican states like Florida and Tennessee and South Dakota, they're doing fine. But the Democrat states, it's as if they want to create a crisis after crisis that keeps them permanently in power. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us your questions freedomarliekirk.com if you want to support us. Charliekirk.com support and get involved with TurningPoint USA today@tpusa.com thanks so much, everybody. Talk to you soon. God bless.