A (7:12)
That is one of the weakest non answers I've ever seen. Remember the Harris administration? Who's actually going to be in control when Kamal is president and Joe Biden is sent off to pasture because either because he's implicated with his son's criminal, international criminal activity or. Or because he doesn't have the mental acuity to be president? When Kamala Harris is president, she will pack the courts. According to a New York Times reporter, they confided privately that Kamala Harris is absolutely open to expanding the number of seats on the Supreme Court. However, as we have detailed before and as we have gone through factually, they do not have the votes. They do not have the support to be able to add seats to the US Supreme Court even if the Democrats take back the Senate to 51 or 52 votes. Joe Manchin, Jon Tester, Mark Kelly, Mark Kelly, who's up in 2022 in Arizona, if he were to beat Martha McSally, which I'm not sure is going to necessarily happen, but it's hard for them to take back the Senate without that happening. If he were to win in Arizona, he is not going to support court packing and court expansionism, where just being up two years after that in 2022 when he's probably going to have a very good challenger, which very well could be a very popular governor here in Arizona by the name of Doug Ducey. So I do not think that court packeting or court expansionism is something that is going to be embraced by the Senate Democrats in any way whatsoever. But one of the major takeaways between President Trump's town hall and Joe Biden's town hall is how President Donald Trump is actually taking critical questions when Joe Biden is not. And I don't expect anything different out of NBC where you go into the absolute most intense anti Trump environment imaginable. But the equivalent of Donald Trump going up against Savannah Guthrie and Joe Biden going to George Stephanopoulos would be like the equivalent would be Donald Trump doing a sit down interview with Sean Hannity and a town hall with Sean Hannity and Joe Biden doing a sit down interview with Laura Ingraham. That's what tonight, that's what last night should have been. There is it's complete home turf for Joe Biden. It is complete home team and it's away team for Donald Trump. He went into very treacherous, very uncertain ground and territory and he held his own. And yet Joe Biden has yet to do a singular interview where he has been asked in recent months direct questions about Hunter Biden's international business dealings, direct questions about specifically, will you pack the cord? He says, I mean, I'm going to read you what he wrote. I am open to considering what happens from that point on. The best equivalent would be, you know, let's get married and once we get married, I'm going to tell you how I really feel. I'm sorry, what like that? It's kind of part of the whole construct of getting into a partnership or believing in somebody. Joe Biden wants you to give him power and then he'll be able to reveal to you exactly how he's going to govern. Say whatever you want about President Trump. President Donald Trump has been abundantly clear about how he stands on every major issue and how he's going to govern. And that's exactly how he did govern. Over the last couple years, the Democrats have become the corporatist party. This is one of President Donald Trump's greatest openings against the Democrat Party that has been misrepresenting and betraying the base of the Democrat Party for the last couple decades. The Democrat Party was traditionally made of working class white voters and ethnic minorities and energized young people. That was traditionally the coalition of the Democrat Party. That is the only way that they are able to win national elections. That's how Bill Clinton won in 1990s, the 1992 and 1996. That's how Barack Obama won in 2008 and 2012. One of the main reasons why President Donald Trump won in 2016 is he took working class whites off the table. And the Democrat Party has done very little to try to win them back. Now, Joe Biden has tried to voice support to try to win back the carpenters, the labor union members, the people that work with their hands, to put it simply, the people that shower before work and shower after work. However, the Democrat Party, through policy, through substance and through publicly declared positions, they have no interest whatsoever to actually be skeptical of big corporations. They have widely accepted tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of dollars from these mega corporations and now voice support for any activity that they do as long as it aligns with their value system. So here you have multi trillion dollar companies like Google, Amazon, Facebook. Facebook is not quite that valuable, but they'll be a trillion dollar company soon that are outwardly suppressing and silencing differing opinions. And the Democrat leadership is saying they're okay with that. Let's go to cut two. Senator Chris Coons, who's supposed to be one of the more moderate voices in the Democrat Party, who's supposed to be one of the least ideologically driven members of the Democrat caucus. He once fought against big tech and now he's saying he's okay with it. Play cut to Facebook and Twitter have policies to not spread things that are utterly unreliable, that have been debunked, and where their origin is untrustworthy. They're practicing their own internal controls, as I wish they had over the past four years. That man's a liar. There's no other way to put it. Tucker Carlson did a great takedown of Senator Chris Coons on his program last evening, and Senator Chris Coons is now praising the outright censorship of differing voices of people that might have factual Information against a candidate that he likes, he wants that completely and totally shut down. So why are Democrats all of a sudden voicing support for the most valuable companies in our country? Look, I'm a free market guy, I'm a capitalist, I'm a conservative. But I'm not a corporatist. And we as conservatives should never become corporatists. The minute that we start to defend entrenched and incumbent corporate interests over entrepreneurs, risk takers, people that are really trying to create value in society versus mega corporations that have hundreds of millions of dollars in capital reserves and billions of dollars in market value and maybe even trillions of dollars in market value, then we've lost sight of really what has made the American economic landscape so exceptional. It is not the fact that we have the most valuable companies. It's the fact that we are able to compete in a marketplace. And when you have these Silicon Valley companies that quite honestly, they're just selling data, they are massive data companies, almost surveillance state capitalism, where they do not charge you to use the product, instead they're selling you to other businesses. And then when there is a story or a narrative that does not perfectly align with their desired worldview or their desired political outcome, then they will push the button to make sure that that does not get spread. President Donald Trump has to lean in on this more the next two weeks of the race. Push Joe Biden on the fact that he has more billionaire support than Donald Trump does. Lean in on the fact that the wealthiest Americans support Joe Biden for President, not Donald Trump for president. That the wealthiest counties in America are Democrat counties and that seven out of 10 of the wealthiest counties in America around Washington D.C. what does Washington D.C. produce? They don't produce cars, they don't produce hardware, they don't produce anything of value for your life. They produce rules, regulations, laws to make your life harder and more difficult. That's who Joe Biden represents. I'm not a big person, I'm not a big believer, I should say in class warfare, but I am a big believer in honesty. And it is dishonest for the Democrats to parade around and say that they want to represent middle class workers while also protecting the incumbency of of multi trillion dollar corporations. A bad story comes out for the Biden campaign against Hunter Biden. Selling access to the highest levels of our government to the Chinese, the Ukrainians and the Russians. Busy guy forgets that he dropped off his computer to a computer repairman in Delaware. The computer repairman tries to contact him. The window expires it becomes abandoned property. After 90 days, computer repairman contacts the FBI as well as Robert Costello, Rudy Giuliani's lawyer. The computer gets handed over and all of a sudden the New York Post comes out with a story a couple weeks out from an election. So the Democrats call on their corporate allies in the trillion dollar Silicon Valley industry and they say, we need a quick one here. We need a big favor. We need you to make sure this story doesn't get distributed. Now, the Biden campaign didn't just want this story to be stunted because of the virality of it. That's part of it, but it's not the full picture. The other part of it is they wanted a alleged third party reference point to invalidate the story so that they don't have to talk about it on cut one. I'm going to show you exactly how this works. And this is so incredibly dark and dangerous for dialogue in civil society. This is Biden's press secretary, I don't know his name, where he refuses to answer the question. And instead he says that the entire topic shouldn't even be discussed because Twitter doesn't allow it to be spread. Play tape. Well, look, I think Twitter's response to the actual article itself makes clear that these purported allegations are false and they're not true. And glad to see social media companies like Twitter taking responsibility to limit misinformation. Jamal Brown, of course he's glad. So a story comes out they don't like that's rooted in facts. They call up a tech oligarch and say, hey, restrict the story. And then we're going to use the fact that you're restricting the story as a reason we don't have to answer it. Thanks so much. We won't regulate you when we get in power. Goodbye. That's how that works. So instead of Jamal Brown having to answer the question, the nice enough woman from Cheddar News, she just backs off. She's like, well, I guess you're right. If the tech companies don't like it, then it must be untrue. Even though a follow up question would have been, well, why is it that the tech companies are restricting access to this? What is their factual basis to it? None whatsoever. And the fact there's more stories coming out from these emails and Rudy Giuliani, who we just finished an interview, says that they've only been through 20% of the hard drive. So the Democrats are in complete collusion with these tech companies. And the Biden campaign, of course, is not going to go after these tech companies, they're not. And you might be listening to this program and you might be a Democrat, you might be a moderate. Wasn't it one of the major rallying cries for Bernie Sanders, that certain corporations have too much power in our country and that the billionaires shouldn't exist and that billionaires have too much power? Wasn't that a core tenant of the Bernie Sanders movement that won the state of California? Is that portion of the Democrat Party non existent now or just been silenced right now? What about Alexandria Ocasio Cortez? AOC made her entire congressional crusade around the idea of criticizing people with a lot of power, allegedly abusing people with not a lot of power. That's her entire congressional crusade. Allegedly. The people that are the strong abusing the innocent or the weak. Where is, where is Alexandria Ocasio Cortez speaking out against a trillion dollar company silencing a story from the New York Post? And to be honest, I bet AOC actually finds this to be reprehensible. I actually do. I think AOC is a legitimate Bolshevik ideologue that doesn't want any person to have a certain amount of power over what she deems to be fair and equitable. I think that the socialist base of the Democrat Party has been muzzled. I think they have put a muzzle. A muzzle or a muffler, if you will, or a silencer is probably a better term over Rashida Tlaib and AOC where they have been widely critical of these tech companies. So what the Democrats did over the last couple years is they complained so loudly and so directly towards these massive mega companies that are more powerful than our own government. They basically extorted them. And there's a reason why. A week and a half ago, the House Democrat Committee came out with a report saying that these tech companies are monopolies. That sent a chilling effect through the tech company community where they said, if they think we're monopolies, what can we do to try to win their favor over. All of this is in direct response also for the tech companies trying to win over Democrats just a week and a half ago. And this is the story that no one else is talking about. And we'll get it pulled up right here. House Democrats came out with a report saying that Amazon, Facebook, they have engaged in monopolistic practices. So these mega corporations, they're a little bit nervous. They say, what can we do to try to not have the Democrats hate us? I know what we'll do the next time they call us to help Restrict a story and they need to lean on us for censorship and then get re referenced for it without any sort of factual basis whatsoever. We're going to do it. That's what they did. And they way overplayed their hand. We detailed this yesterday, we dove very deep into it where these tech companies are now being called with subpoena to testify. And also Ajit Pai has come out and said that Section 230 is now in desperate and dire need to be re clarified. And so this presents a very exciting political opportunity for President Donald Trump. It really does. Because a vast majority of Americans are skeptical of big government and big business and they especially don't like it when big government and big business work together. That is unanimously reprehensible amongst the working class in our country, amongst the muscular class in our country. Remember, we could be capitalists, we shouldn't be corporatists. And so I think President Donald Trump for an economic message should lean in and say do you like it when multi trillion dollar companies that are more powerful than our own government are working in collusion with a person running for office? That should bother you. It should have bothered somebody in the early 1900s if John D. Rockefeller or J.P. morgan was working in collusion to try to get William McKinley elected or Teddy Roosevelt. Obviously they wouldn't try to get Teddy Roosevelt elected. He broke him up. Or Taft elected or Woodrow Wilson elected who were all the major political figures at the time. It would have bothered somebody in the 1990s if Bill Gates was working in collusion with Bill Clinton to try to get him elected through micro. And it should and it will. And it does bother people that publicly traded companies that sell you where you are the product are able to pick up the phone and secretly work to silence stories that they don't like. Then they get cover fire from Senator Chris Coons and they get Jamal Brown because he gets to say all the tech companies don't like it. So I don't have to talk about it. What you're seeing right here is a recalibration of the American political landscape. And it is exciting, but it's also urgent. It's both. It's exciting because it presents an opportunity for the Republicans to dominate politically for the next couple decades. It's urgent because if you do not step up right now, if we do not step up right now and make the necessary political adjustments, they will use the corporate power to completely obliterate us. They will where if you dare come out with a story they don't like, they'll just deactivate your accounts like they did for Kayleigh McEnany, the press secretary of the United States. For the President of the United States, they just deactivate her account. We don't like you. Goodbye. Joe Biden was asked in his town hall much nicer questions than Donald Trump was, mind you. But Joe Biden was asked in particular. Let's go to cut seven. If Donald Trump's foreign policy deserves credit with, quote, all the peace breaking out. What a great quote. I'm going to use that. All the peace breaking out. I like this guy. Let's play cut 7.