Loading summary
Transcript36 lines
- [00:00]
Charlie Kirk
Hey everybody. I went to Greenland. That's right. I flew in the middle of the night with Donald Trump Jr. On Trump Force One to Nook, Greenland. What I saw, what I learned and why Greenland matters for America. Here exclusively on the Charlie Kirk Show. Subscribe to our podcast and become a member today. Members.charliekirk.com members.charliekirk dot com when you guys become a member, you are entered to win a free trip to the inauguration, stay at a five star hotel. Round trip ticket go to Trump's inauguration, including the Turning Point Ball, a once in a lifetime opportunity for two people that will be selected. Members.charliekirk.com members.charliekirk.Com so check it out right now. Members.charliekink.com as always, you can email us freedomarliekirk.com and get involved attorney.usa@tpusa.com that is tpusa.com Buckle up everybody. Here we go.
- [00:53]
Ron Johnson
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
- [00:55]
John Fetterman
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
- [00:57]
Ron Johnson
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie.
- [01:04]
Charlie Kirk
He's an incredible guy, his spirit, his.
- [01:06]
Ron Johnson
Love of this country.
- [01:07]
Charlie Kirk
He's done an amazing job building one.
- [01:10]
Ron Johnson
Of the most powerful youth organizations ever.
- [01:12]
Charlie Kirk
Created, Turning Point usa. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble gold investments@noblegoldinvestments.com that is noblegoldinvestments.com it's where I buy all of my gold. Go to noblegoldinvestments.com I am back behind the microphone, back from Greenland. Lots to share about that. I first want to say we are going to cover the terrible tragedy, what's happening with the California fires later this program. Three friends of mine have already lost their homes. It's a terrible situation. We're going to cover it extensively. But first I want to give you in this audience an exclusive update of what I was up to this last 24 hours. Donald Trump Jr. Very good friend of mine, gave me a call, said, hey, do you want to come to Greenland? Yeah, that sounds great. So we boarded Trump Force One at 2am on January 7th. I even hid this from most of my own staff. Almost no one had any Idea this was not to be leaked, not to be publicized. At 2am we got on Trump Force One and flew from Palm beach to Nook. To Nook, Greenland. Six hour flight, three hour time change. Let's get all the videos guys up there and all the pictures, please. Landed around 11am local time as the sun was rising. The sunrise in Greenland this time of year is at 11am get off the plane. And by the way, we are greeted by hundreds of people, hundreds of people that are just curious. We then go to the top of a very sacred site in Greenland, the place where the first missionary actually ever came to Greenland from Europe in 1745. Yeah, that's it right there. That's right as the sun is rising. And all of a sudden we started to run into people with MAGA hats all throughout Nook, Greenland. Now, mind you, the population of Greenland is 50,000 people. In Nook, it's something like 30,000 people maybe. And all of a sudden people are lining the streets asking Donald Trump Jr. For pictures. And they have MAGA hats and there's people. By the way, there was a greeting group at the airport of hundreds of people. What was striking is how many people in Nook, Greenland watched the Charlie Kirk show, followed us on TikTok. They said, oh, I follow you on TikTok. Oh, I follow you on social media. There's one of the people right there with the MAGA hat who was working at the airport and greeted us with a MAGA hat on right as the Trump Force One was coming in. One of the ushers at the airport. We then went to a restaurant and we were literally so. We were so consumed by people, so overwhelmed, we had to go get a private room. And then we brought some of the, the local folks in. There's Donald Trump Jr. Just with some of the workers there, signing MAGA hats, taking questions, talking to people. And we were there for three hours on the ground. And we learned a lot. We learned a lot. Number one, it is so hard to do it justice. It's very, very hard to articulate. It's hard to show the pictures of just how beautiful Greenland is. I've been to Alaska, I've been to all parts of Canada. It is objectively one of the most pristine, overwhelming physical environments that I have ever seen. It's untouched. It's as raw nature as you can ever find that you can ever come in contact with. It's like you are here. And there is the wild. There's polar bears that walk around Nook. Polar bears, very spiritual in many Ways incredibly so. That's number one. Number two, talking to the locals and getting to know them, they can't stand their current Danish masters. They believe that Denmark, who is currently controlling of Greenland and of Nuuk, which is the largest city in Greenland, they are being mistreated. They do not like the status quo and they want a change. They say that when they go to Copenhagen, which of course is the capital of Denmark, they are told by local Danes, go back to your home of Nook. You're not welcome here. They want to be part of a country that respects them, that gives them human rights. Right now they said, quote, we feel like prisoners in our own land, that we are being controlled by these Danish masters who treat us terribly. And number three, which was the other takeaway? The people of Greenland are some of the sweetest. They are some of the kindest and warmest people. Incredibly authentic. Now, you might be asking, but what is the reason that everyone is talking about Greenland? Greenland is not just a fun issue to debate. There are very serious geopolitical reasons as to why the United States of America should assume control or purchase or whatever process the President ends up doing back control of Greenland. Number one, Greenland is the northernmost land in the Western hemisphere and has critical military importance. The shortest route from America to Russia is actually across the North Pole. That's why we have actually a military base in northern Greenland, Thule Space Force Base, whose purpose is to monitor potential and possible missile launches. Greenland is the world's largest island. There are tons of resources buried under its ice cap. We actually don't even know how wealthy this country is. As a side note, a young boy comes up. He says, charlie, Charlie. I said, oh, hey, how are you? I follow you on TikTok. I need to show you something. He shows me his phone. He says, in my village, three hours from here, when we just kind of go out into the countryside, we find rubies the size of baseballs. I said, what? He said, we have rubies the size of baseballs in my village. Now, mind you, they're not as valuable as you might think because they need to be cut a certain way and they lose value. But they're very valuable. And he says, the Danes don't let us mine our rubies or our gold, our lithium or our gas. He said, it's time for a rebellion against the Danes. The younger people of Nook, the younger people of Greenland, they want to be rich and oh, my goodness, do they have wealth in Greenland. Incomprehensible amounts of wealth. We are talking that Greenland could be the new Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Russia, Permian Basin, Marcellus Shale and the Balkan all mixed into one. America should want those resources for our country, and Greenland should want them for their country. We'd be far more willing and able to develop them than Denmark and the socialist Greta Thunberg, environmentalists from Copenhagen. In the long run, they will be developed by someone. There are three options of who will control Greenland. America, Russia, or China. America, Russia, or China. You're trying to tell me the Danish military is going to be able to fend off the Chinese Communist Party? Greenland is so strategic, this is the third and final point, that During World War II, the United States occupied it just to keep Germans from seizing it. After the war, we briefly proposed buying it back, but instead we gave it back. We never should have given it back. We should have insisted on a sale and assumed control of it. Acquiring Greenland would give America a sense of growing vitality. There would be a new American territory for ambitious Americans to go and develop. And I could tell you in my short time there, but it was very thorough. There is so much opportunity. You are talking about places where resorts can be developed, entrepreneurs can deepen their roots. The fishing, the wildlife, the hunting, the natural experience. It is a perfect fit to the United States. And people say, oh, you know, Charlie, America shouldn't expand. Well, Alaska's part of the United States. We purchased Alaska, and that was a good purchase for America. Greenland for the 21st century would not just be good, it is essential. It is integral strategic location, defense against threats, access to key resources, preventing China's expansion and economic and military advantage. It was an honor to be able to see Greenland firsthand and right up close. I never thought I would do it. And I think the table is set for President Trump to make the art of the deal happen, the art of the possible. And we might welcome Greenland as part of our American family. While we may have won this election, the fight to restore our great nation is only beginning. Now is the time to take a stand, and Patriot Mobile is leading the charge. As America's only Christian conservative wireless provider, Patriot Mobile offers a way to vote with your wallet without compromising on quality or convenience. Patriot Mobile isn't just about providing exceptional cell phone service. It's a call to action to defend our rights and freedoms. With Patriot Mobile, you'll get outstanding nationwide coverage because they operate on all three major networks. If you have a cell phone service today, you can get a cell phone service with Patriot Mobile with a coverage guarantee. But the difference is every dollar you spend supports the first and second Amendments, sanctity of life, our veterans and first responders switching is easy. Keep your number, keep your phone or upgrade. Their 100%. US based customer service team will help you find the perfect plan. Go to patriotmobile.com charlie or call 972 Patriot and get a free month of service with promo code Charlie, switch to Patriot Mobile today and defend freedom with every call and text you make. Visit patriotmobile.com charlie or call 972 Patriot. The people of Greenland are being terrorized by the Danish government. And some people are saying oh you know, why do we want to expand the United States of America? Look, we don't have a choice. China is expanding and it's not a matter of even expansionism. If you are against the acquisition of Greenland, then you should say let's give Alaska back to Russia. You must be consistent. You should say, hey, we should just give the Louisiana Purchase back to the French. Greenland is a small population of people that want to be great, that want their country back, that wants to come to greatness. And they were so complimentary of America. They said Americans, Americans are the nicest, they are the kindest. This is what the Greenlandic government said in 2021 when it scuttled the search for oil there quote, the future does not lie in oil. The future belongs to renewable energy. The government said it wants to take co responsibility for combating the global climate crisis. So what they're saying is they want the people of Nook to remain poor because of climate change. No growth really. How are you going to power all of your AI data centers? So basically let's keep Greenland in the third world while they are sitting on liquid gold and a lot of liquid gold by the way, you could structure a deal very similar to Alaska where there is a trust, basically a universal basic income where the people of Greenland could all get royalties off of the extracted oil, natural gas and minerals. It works in Alaska and it could work in Greenland. They have 50,000 people in Greenland and they could all be partners in this deal. And how about lithium or nickel? The key ingredients of technology, of the technology of the future. This stuff does not just come ex nihilo and fall from the skies and the heavens. What do you think your semiconductors are made of? What do you think your phones are made of? These environmentalists, they never want us to dig or search or exploit. At the same time they want to have an AI data center so you could go make an image of a cat dancing to ymca. Well, what do you think actually powers the ability for you to be able to do that. Rare earth, by the way, is a huge component. Do you know that the Chinese Communist Party controls 80% of all of the planet's rare earth minerals? So here you have Greenland with wonderful people, strategically located liquid gold, nickel, lithium, rare earth Minerals. It has 56,000 people. So you're not talking about potentially assuming 56 million people. 56,000 people. And by the way, if the Democrats all of a sudden say, oh, I don't know, you guys let 10,000 people a day into this country illegally, I think 56,000 people in a separate territory is perfectly legitimate. If we're going to get liquid gold, natural resources, strategic placement against Russia and China, I mean, it's nothing but benefits. But there is this other component makes America dream again that we're not just this sad, low testosterone beta male slouching in our chair, allowing the world to run over us. It is the resurrection of masculine American energy. It is the return of manifest destiny. Gulf of America. We're taking back the Panama Canal and we're gonna do whatever it takes to have Greenland be part of the United States of America. And look, you can let the locals make decisions about their sovereignty. Do a referendum. If there is a referendum, the Danes will lose. I guarantee that if there is a referendum, the Danes will lose. The Greenlandic people love America. They're wearing MAGA hats on the side of the street, cheering. How hard is it to get a MAGA hat in Greenland? It's pretty remarkable. This is about strengthening and solidifying the United States of America. We've tried many times to try to purchase Greenland. It's not a new idea, but also the Danes should sit this one out. How many hundreds of billions of dollars have we spent on European security and defense over the years? On NATO, on our military bases? We pay for all of their national defense. And Denmark is a small country. Small, nice, fine, whatever. I think they're technically a Scandinavian country. I think they are. Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, I think they are. So I had nothing against Denmark, but the Danes are not going to stand up to the Chinese Communist Party. That's a joke. Not going to stand up to this behemoth in the east for the well being of the people of Greenland. Come under the United States of America. You'll be wealthier, you'll be happier, you'll be protected, you'll be safer. You are living through history, everybody. And we will cherish your homeland and protect it from all the enemies around the world. And we will make Greenland great again. As we step into 2025. The one thing is clear, de dollarization is accelerating. China and the other BRICS nations are determined to reduce their dependence on the US Dollar and establish themselves as global economic superpowers. Their secret weapon? Gold. China resumed buying gold recently. And you know what's even more telling? They under report their buy. Does that make you wonder why they recognize its global value and ability to withstand stocks. Gold is a global asset with innate value. It's tangible, reliable and immune to economic manipulation. China and other BRICS countries want to be prepared. They just don't want it to be known. But this is not about other nations. It's about you. In a world of shifting economic power, gold is your hedge against uncertainty. Noble Gold Investments can help you secure a financial future with gold. Visit noblegoldinvestments.com today to learn more and you'll receive two 5 ounce silver America the Beautiful coins when you open a qualified account that is noblegoldinvestments.com noblegold investments joining us now is Senator Ron Johnson from the great state of Wisconsin. Senator, thank you so much for joining the program. Lots to cover here. Senator, first I want to talk about some news within the United States Senate. Are you in the opinion that we should have one major omnibus bill or two separate spending bills?
- [18:30]
Ron Johnson
Listen, I'll go with whatever works. I personally think it'd be easier to quick get the border funding passed because I think the, you know, the tax bill settling on. I think the major sticking point is going to be what spending level are we going to agree to within the conference. We've got big spenders in our conference as well. I don't think anybody voted for President Trump to maintain Biden's spending levels. And I want to talk a little bit about that, but I think the easiest thing to do would be two packages, quite honestly, so we can get that border funding right away before the news media starts talking about what it looks like to deport. Somebody could have a few individuals waiver on their support for that. So I'd rather get the border funding done and then take our time. Part of the tax thing. I'd really like to simplify and rationalize our tax code. Primary goal is prevent a massive automatic tax increase from occurring in 2026. I mean, that ought to be incentive enough. But as long as we're doing that, if we can simplify rationalized tax code, that'd be a good thing. But we must agree on dramatically lower spending levels than what we're spending right now. This is absurd that we haven't returned to some pre pandemic baseline in 2019, Charlie, we spent $4.4 trillion. Then we have the spending spree during 2020. That was 6.6 trillion. Last five years, we've averaged $6.5 trillion. We've never returned to pre pandemic level baseline, which is absurd. It's ridiculous. It's just not justified.
- [20:00]
Charlie Kirk
Yeah. So what is the appetite right now in the US Senate to cut spending? Is there anybody in the Democrat Party that's interested in this? Because we're borrowing a trillion dollars every hundred days.
- [20:10]
Ron Johnson
No. And my concern is we're not gonna have enough Republicans that are willing to do it either. Again, it's so easy to just say, oh, well, this is what we spent last year. And boy, if we don't spend at least that amount, we're gonna be accused of starving women and children. So I'm trying to make the case. I'm trying to actually tell the American public these are the numbers, because I think we have a general sense that we're, you know, federal government is totally out of control, but nobody knows specifically that's what I'm saying. 4.4 trillion in 2019, last five years, now 6.5 trillion. Charlie, that's absurdity. It's like a family who makes 100,000 bucks, right? Or spends $100,000. They have an illness, all of a sudden, they have $50,000 worth of medical bills, so they spend 150. That individual gets cured. But they keep going. They keep continue to spend 150,000 bucks and borrow the money to do it. I mean, nobody would do that. That's exactly what the federal government's doing. So I think we explained this. I've come up with a couple different options. For example, if you go back to 1998, that's the last year, the first year we had a surplus since 1969. This was Bill Clinton spending. And you take Social Security and Medicare off the table, you just plug those in at Biden's 2025 numbers and interest, but inflate all of Bill Clinton's spending to account for population growth and inflation, we'd be spending $5.5 trillion and we have a balanced budget. So is anybody argue that Bill Clinton didn't spend enough money on all this other crap? If you go back to Obama's 2014 did the same thing, that'd be $6.2 trillion. Even if you use 2019 and inflate it again based on population and inflation, you'd be about 6.5, which is $800 billion less than what Biden says he's going to spend right now. So why would we lock into Biden numbers and be arguing over saving 100 billion or so? I mean, it's so inadequate. We need to dramatically lower the baseline spending level back to what it was prior to the pandemic.
- [22:11]
Charlie Kirk
I totally and completely agree. If you were to say just some of the. And I know you've detailed some of this, but where can we find some agreement in the Republican conference of where to cut? Is there any appetite to cut? Some of the Pentagon budget certainly is on my part.
- [22:26]
Ron Johnson
I think we need to really take a look at where do we spend our money. I mean, we've got these massive platforms that can be taken out with asymmetric warfare. We got these Abrams tanks. They have to kind of run out of their hole in Ukraine, fire a couple shots and run right back because they're vulnerable to the drones, you know, to drones across thousands of dollars, not millions. So again, again, the Pentagon, that they're not, they're not keeping up with, with warfare right now, they're coddling to the Military Industrial Complex 155 millimeter shells. This is a prime example. Russia produces those things, about four and a half million of them at about $600 a pop. The west can only produce about 2 million shells. We get charged $6,000, €8,000 in Europe. That's how we're getting hosed, I'll use that word, by the military industrial complex. So, yeah, no, we've got to take a real serious look at that.
- [23:20]
Charlie Kirk
So, Senator, let's now dive into the very curious developments of John Fetterman. John Fetterman, who seems to be very hard to pinpoint here. Here he is in this interview admonishing his fellow Democrats for opposing the Lake and Riley act. Let's play cut 64.
- [23:41]
John Fetterman
We have hundreds and hundreds of thousands of migrants here illegally that have convicted of crimes. And I don't know why, you know, who wants to defend, to allow them to remain in our nation. That. And now if you're here illegally and you're committing crimes and those things, I don't know why anybody thinks that it's controversial, that they all need to go.
- [24:05]
Charlie Kirk
Do you think that this was one of, if not the biggest issue for this election?
- [24:10]
John Fetterman
Well, I think if we can't, you know, there's 47 of us in the Senate, and if we can't pull up with, with seven votes, if we can't get at least seven out of 47, if we can't, then that's the reason why we lost. That's one of the. That's one of why we lost in part.
- [24:27]
Charlie Kirk
Senator, what is going on with Mr. Fetterman?
- [24:30]
Ron Johnson
Well, first of all, he comes from a swing state like I do, and he realizes that, you know, obviously they lost the Senate seat in Pennsylvania. He'll be up for reelection eventually. I think, again, he's smart enough to realize that that was a big issue in this election. And by the way, who could oppose, literally what rational individual can oppose deporting criminals? Well, Democrat Party in total, they did oppose that because they wanted an open border. They elect George Soros, prosecutors, but a lot of those prosecutors lost as well. So Fetterman in a swing state sees when the tide turns, and he's a smart enough politician to at least not buck these major trends where, again, you can't defend opposing a bill that's going to deport criminals.
- [25:17]
Charlie Kirk
So it's hard to tell whether or not it's authentic. Do you think that there will be more Democrats that potentially might signal similarly? And Jon Ossoff or others, your thoughts on this?
- [25:28]
Ron Johnson
Well, listen, I think vulnerable Democrats, those are up for reelection, 20, 26. They may vote. I'll be surprised if we get more than six, because if we get seven, the bill passes. I'm not sure the Democrat Party's gonna let it pass. I mean, again, I can't explain that. I mean, I can't explain liberalism. I can't explain the way the Democrat Party is taking such a strong, you know, turn to the left here. But that's, that's who they are right now.
- [25:55]
Charlie Kirk
The. Let's play cut 95. Senator Fetterman of whether or not he might support some of Trump's nominees. Play cut 95.
- [26:03]
John Fetterman
But I want to sit down and have a conversation, and I'm, I'm really glad that I've done that. And some of these nominees I'm going to vote for already, in fact, you know, whether it's my, our colleague Rubio, our Representative Stefan Nick, or even Sean Duffy, and I expect to vote for him as well, too. And Brooke Rollins for, for agriculture again. So there's a lot of them I can say right now here on fox. I'm going to vote for them. But. And there's others, you know, but that we're going to go through the process. But I'm open to hear from everyone. And I don't know why that's controversial.
- [26:38]
Charlie Kirk
I mean, I wish that was the way that this would, this would proceed, that we would have more discussions and dialogues like this and be open minded. I mean, Senator, you voted for some nominees of other parties before. Can you speak to that? I'm not putting you on the spot for that, but I'm saying there should be some yielding to an incoming administration, correct?
- [27:00]
Ron Johnson
Well, that pretty much used to be the tradition of the Senate is okay, elections matter. A president should decide who wants to serve in their cabinet. And as long as there's nothing disqualifying, you, go ahead and confirm that nominee. For one thing, you want to work with those department heads. So you don't want to start off a relationship and say, I'm going to vote against you. So again, the bias always was, if it's a qualified individual, elections matter, you go ahead, vote for confirmation and try and work with that department head for the benefit of our constituents and for the benefit of America. I stopped doing that with the Biden administration because the nominees were just wacko, radical leftists. And in the end, you say, I can't support that at all. So it's changed. It's become very partisan. And that is unfortunate. But what Fetterman's talking about right now is pretty much the way that the Senate has always traditionally looked at confirmations. And there's been a lot of bipartisan support for, you know, cabinet heads.
- [28:00]
Charlie Kirk
In closing here, Senator, is there any red flags that you are seeing from Pete to Tulsi to Bobby Kennedy, Cash? Some senators are saying that all of Trump's nominees seem poised to be confirmed. Would you agree with that assessment?
- [28:12]
Ron Johnson
I think so. Because the default position, particularly on the Republican side, is elections do matter. Trump had a convincing victory. And it's up to Trump to decide who he wants serving his cabinets. You know, I may, you know, whether you like that individual or not, you're not the president. He is. And so our duty is pretty much get in line and go ahead and confirm his nominees, barring some really disqualifying factors. So I think that's the attitude of most Republican senators and I do expect them to get confirmed.
- [28:39]
Charlie Kirk
What is the importance of the upcoming Wisconsin Supreme Court race?
- [28:43]
Ron Johnson
Senator, it's vital. Anybody who wants to run for president is Republican in 2028, better help support our candidate for the Supreme Court if you want to maintain a majority in the House. If that court remains liberal, they will redistrict the federal and we'll probably lose a couple of House seats and we may Never get the 10 electoral votes for Wisconsin again. So it's absolutely crucial. America has to focus on this. Democrats will Democrats will send tens of millions of dollars as they have in the past, be the same support from conservatives and from Republicans.
- [29:18]
Charlie Kirk
Senator Johnson, thank you so much. Excellent work as always. Thank you.
- [29:22]
Ron Johnson
Have a great day.
- [29:25]
Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk here. For many of us, the new year brings new joys and new financial challenges. My friends Andrew and Todd from Sierra Pacific Mortgage are to help you get organized for the new year with a free financial checkup. I think the world of these guys. They helped me with a very complex loan recently. So listen carefully. Find out exactly where you stand with your real estate, finance, college debt, yearly property taxes and all those expenses you racked up over the holidays. Andrew and Todd, who are amazing people, are your friends in the mortgage business, the experts you can trust. And when you get your free financial checkup, you'll be working with Andrew and Todd and their team directly because they handle everything themselves. They can help you reduce your mortgage payments, pay off those high interest credit cards and have money to fund that big project or be positioned to take advantage of unexpected dips in the market. Start the new year with financial stability. Get your free financial checkup today. Just go to andrewandtod.com and fill out their quick form or call 888-1172, that is 888-88-1172. Check out my friends at andrewandtod.com, andrewandtod.com the Mark Zuckerberg news is very big. I did not get a chance to comment on it. For those of you that missed the program yesterday or do not quite know the news, Mark Zuckerberg announced sweeping policy changes saying they're getting rid of their fact checking department, that this election was about more speech, not less speech, that they're changing their content moderation team to go from California to Texas. These are dramatic changes. And before I get into the details here, and I've had a chance to sit down with Mark Zuckerberg, I'm getting to know Mark Zuckerberg. People say, do you trust them or not? I said, I'm getting to know him. I found him to be very sincere when I sat down with him. But it's going to be a growing relationship over these years that I appreciate. Basically, Mark and the Facebook team, Joel Kaplan and everybody who Joel, I do know very well to stand up to the government, to stand up to these regimes and say, no, we are going to protect freedom of speech. We're going to protect freedom of discourse. Let's play some pieces of tape here. This is cut 51.
- [31:28]
Mark Zuckerberg
Hey everyone, I want to talk about something Important today because it's time to get back to our roots around free expression on Facebook and Instagram. There's been widespread debate about potential harms from online content. Governments and legacy media have pushed to censor more and more. A lot of this is clearly political, but there's also a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there. Drugs, terrorism, child exploitation. These are things that we take very seriously and I want to make sure that we handle responsibly. So we built a lot of complex systems to moderate content. But the problem with complex systems is they make mistakes. And we've reached a point where it's just too many mistakes and too much censorship. So we're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our platforms.
- [32:17]
Charlie Kirk
We got to give Elon so much credit. He took the risk and stood up for freedom of speech. And this is a movement now, three years later, we are going to have the most open Internet that we've had in a decade. And the trend was a more controlled, a censored and censored Internet. We were going towards totalitarianism online. And Elon Musk bought Twitter. And because of his purchase of Twitter, President Trump was then able to win a triumphant landslide victory. And here we are, fast forward three years later where you have Facebook sounding like Elon Musk. And in fact, Mark Zuckerberg went as far to say in his comments, x has it right. We want to follow more of the model of X. And Meta has made a lot of mistakes and there has to be a lot of proof that they are ready to show that this is not just talk, but this is action real. Follow through accounts restored. No more fact checking, no more suppression of political posts. You must trust, but verify. And I could tell you this last year, I mean, I said this to the Facebook team, I said this to Mark. TikTok was way more viral for us than Instagram this last year. It wasn't even close. Daisy and the team did a great job running Instagram, but TikTok was as hot as a pistol. I mean, TikTok was billions and billions and billions of views. And one of the reasons why is Facebook made a decision that they were going to dampen down all political content this year, that it wasn't going to be as easy for political content to go viral on Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg made his announcement. So sorry, never mind. We're gonna go back. And that's a good thing that you're going back. These should not be political actors. And there does need to be some proof that the atonement for the $400 million given to Joe Biden to get him elected in 2020, that you gotta, you gotta get over that. But I can say this is phenomenal development. Phenomenal. Mark Zuckerberg is reading the room and the trend is our friend. We should welcome that. By the way, some people are saying, oh, you know, I don't trust him. I'm not asking you to trust him. You should welcome when people come in your direction, that is key. You should not be bitter or walled off where you say, oh, you weren't with me. When it's a different thing of having people in your inner circle versus saying he's in control of the biggest platform on the planet. He's saying something we agree with. He's doing things allegedly that we agree with. He wants to fight regime censorship around the world. That I applaud. And as somebody who has 4 million followers on Instagram and a couple million followers on Facebook, I can tell you that a free and open Facebook and meta is very, very good for the cause of America first and liberty and the cause that we care about on this program. Email me your thoughts. Freedom. Charliekirk.com thanks so much for listening, everybody. Text this episode to a couple friends and donate to turningpoint usatpusa.com thanks so much for listening and God bless. Bless. For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.
- [35:16]
John Fetterman
Com.