Is It Time for Obamagate?

Summary

The Charlie Kirk Show: "Is It Time for Obamagate?"
Release Date: July 21, 2025

---

Introduction

In this compelling episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, host Andrew Colvett steps in for Charlie Kirk to dissect one of the most explosive political allegations of recent times: Tulsi Gabbard's claims of a "treasonous conspiracy" orchestrated by the Obama administration to undermine President Trump's tenure. The discussion navigates through the intricacies of intelligence manipulation, Senate confirmations, and the broader implications for American democracy.

---

Tulsi Gabbard’s Obamagate Allegations

Unveiling the Conspiracy
At the heart of the episode lies the bombshell revelation by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, who accuses former President Barack Obama and key intelligence officials of engineering a massive conspiracy to delegitimize President Trump's victory in the 2016 election. Gabbard alleges that:

• Intelligence Manipulation: Obama directed the intelligence community to alter assessments regarding Russian interference, culminating in a January 6th report that contradicted earlier findings.

• Use of the Steele Dossier: According to Gabbard, the now-discredited Steele dossier was employed to fabricate evidence supporting the narrative of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.

• Long-Term Coup Attempt: She describes the efforts as a "years-long coup" aimed at destabilizing the Trump administration, leading to the Mueller investigation and multiple impeachments.

Notable Quotes:

• Tulsi Gabbard at [22:48]: “Over 100 documents that we released on Friday really detail and provide evidence of how this treasonous conspiracy was directed by President Obama...”

• Tulsi Gabbard at [27:45]: “The American people not only deserve the truth and accountability... There must be accountability. The truth must be shown to the American people...”

Discussion and Analysis
Andrew and guest Stephen Miller delve into the feasibility and potential repercussions of Gabbard's claims:

• Skeptical Optimism: While acknowledging the gravity of the allegations, there's a cautious approach towards expecting immediate accountability, given the complexities of prosecuting high-level officials for treasonous activities.

• Legal Challenges: Miller highlights the stringent constitutional definitions of treason, rendering such charges against the Obama administration highly unlikely. He emphasizes that "levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies" is a steep standard that may not align with the alleged actions.

• Political Implications: The conversation also touches upon the political landscape, noting that Obama remains a popular figure, which could complicate efforts to hold him accountable without broad bipartisan support.

Counterpoints and Concerns
Andrew counters with the emotional and national impact of the alleged conspiracy, arguing that:

• National Trust: The integrity of elections and public trust in democratic institutions are at stake, necessitating a thorough investigation.

• Historical Context: He references past attempts to undermine political opponents, underscoring the need to prevent a nation fraught with legal infighting and mistrust.

---

Senate Confirmations and Legislative Hurdles

Following the discussion on Obamagate, the episode transitions to the crucial topic of Senate confirmations, featuring insights from Senator Rick Scott of Florida.

Current Challenges:

• Delays in Confirmations: Democrats have been slowing down the confirmation process, leading to a bottleneck in approving critical nominees across various tiers, including undersecretaries, ambassadors, judges, U.S. attorneys, and marshals.

• August Recess and Legislative Schedule: President Trump has urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to cancel the August recess and long weekends to expedite confirmations. Senator Scott elaborates on the logistical challenges and the potential need for senators to work extended hours, including weekends, to meet the administration's demands.

Notable Quotes:

• Senator Rick Scott at [29:14]: “It never made sense, this Russian hoax. It always seemed like it was all fabrication to hurt Trump and hurt Republicans.”

• Senator Rick Scott at [32:15]: “We're starting the appropriations process. So be very... heading towards a balanced budget. Trump wants a balanced budget.”

Strategic Approaches:

• Leadership and Participation: Scott emphasizes the importance of both Senate leaders and Republican senators actively participating to overcome Democratic resistance.

• Impact on Governance: Without timely confirmations, the administration's ability to execute its agenda is significantly hampered, affecting everything from foreign policy to judicial appointments.

---

Hunter Biden’s Rhetoric and Media Portrayal

The episode also addresses recent clips of Hunter Biden, which have been circulating in the media, showcasing his vehement criticism of Democratic figures and policies.

Key Points:

• Aggressive Messaging: Hunter Biden's fiery remarks against prominent Democrats and political strategists reflect his disillusionment with the current political climate.

• Impact on Public Perception: The host underscores how such rhetoric embodies the frustrations of a segment of the American populace, highlighting issues like illegal immigration and national security concerns.

Notable Clips:

• Hunter Biden at [40:35]: “If I became president... I would pick up the phone and call president of El Salvador and say you either send them back or I'm gonna invade crime.”

Discussion:

• Defamation of Democracy: The conversation critiques the portrayal of Democrats as disconnected elites, arguing that Biden's comments reinforce negative stereotypes and deepen political divides.

---

Closing Thoughts and Future Directions

As the episode concludes, the hosts reiterate the need for accountability and effective legislative action to restore trust in American institutions. They emphasize:

• Balanced Approach: While supporting the investigation into Obamagate, there's a call for measured responses to avoid exacerbating political tensions.

• Continued Vigilance: The importance of Senate confirmations for the administration’s success remains a top priority, with Senator Scott pledging to push for a balanced budget and continued legislative progress.

Final Quote:

• Senator Rick Scott at [38:58]: “Trump wants a balanced budget. We've got to balance the budget or we'll not see lower interest rates, will not see inflation under control. That's the biggest issue we got to deal with right now.”

---

Conclusion

This episode of The Charlie Kirk Show provides a thorough examination of the Obamagate allegations, the intricacies of Senate confirmations, and the broader impact of political rhetoric on American democracy. Through insightful discussions and notable quotes, the show underscores the pressing need for accountability, effective governance, and the restoration of public trust in democratic processes.

---

For more detailed analyses and updates on these stories, visit charliekirk.com.

Transcript

[Andrew Colvett]

Hey, everybody. Welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show. Andrew Colvett in for Charlie Kirk who's on assignment today. He'll be back in tomorrow. And the rest of the week we're live@the bitcoin.com studios. We talk about the explosive bombshell allegations made by Dni Tulsi Gabbard about what happened in the weeks between the 2016 election and the inauguration in 2017. Did Obama instruct his intel community to change and alter and manufacture intelligence to subvert the will of the American people and destroy our democracy? Do we need to be careful to not get too excited and over our skis about the prospects of accountability and prosecutions? Blake Neff joins us to discuss that. Then we welcome Senator Rick Scott to talk about Senate confirmations. Why is this so important? What needs to be done? What can leader Thune do to correct course we are behind? And then finally we talk about Hunter Biden, the vulgar, bitter drug addict and president's son who's a national embarrassment. But he does have a few good one liners. We will give him that. If this show means something to you, if you get something out of this show, if this community that we're building around the Charlie Kirk show is resonating with you and is a source of peace and order in a sea of chaos, Please consider joining members.charlie kirk.com that's members.charlie kirk. Com where you can be a paid subscriber, monthly subscriber, to get exclusive content, to get exclusive access to our events and live recordings and so much more. That's members charliekirk.com buckle up. Here we go, Charlie.

[Blake Neff]

What you've done is incredible here.

[Rick Scott]

Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.

[Andrew Colvett]

I want you to know we are.

[Tulsi Gabbard]

Lucky to have Charlie Kirk.

[Andrew Colvett]

Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point usa.

[Blake Neff]

We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives. And we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble gold [e-mail] that is noblegoldinvestments.com it's where I buy all of my gold. Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.

[Andrew Colvett]

Everybody, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show. Andrew Colvett, executive producer of this fine show in for you today. Charlie Kirk is on assignment, but we are also joined by Blake Neff. Blake, thanks for joining us this morning.

[Stephen Miller]

Howdy there, Andrew.

[Andrew Colvett]

Blake, there's a ton of news. I'm gonna do a rapid fire real quick list of everything that's on my radar right now. And then we're gonna get into what I believe is the bombshell story of the morning, which is of course DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassifying documents back from 2016, 2017, ahead of when President Trump took office. We're gonna go into detail there. And you've got a bit of a contrarian take, I'll give you that. And actually it's why I wanted you on the show this morning, Blake. So I want us to have a, a clear eyed view of the landscape so we don't get over our skis, we don't over promise and under deliver. So we're going to get to that in just a second. But here's just a smattering of some of the things that are going on in the country. We got borders, art, Tom Homan saying that we're going to flood the zone in sanctuary cities. He's going to triple down in sanctuary cities. And that of course comes after this egregious shooting in New York City where you had two Dominican nationals illegals that tried to rob and then shot an off duty customs and Border patrol agent. Just egregious. We've got Scott Besant who is zeroing in on the Fed saying that he's not even sure what all these PhDs do there. You've got President Trump calling for an end to cashless bail, which is amazing. He's also calling for a restoration of the names Redskins and Indians, which we completely endorse. It was peak woke that those names changed. We've got pressure on the Senate to get President Trump's confirmations, the judges, all the down the line confirmations. We got Obama admitting that Democrats have villainized young men. We've got Carney in Canada and King Charles in the UK basically blessing and legitimizing the Muslim takeover of those countries and so much more. I mean, I'm probably missing something but that, I mean, there's a lot going on today. It's absolutely busy news day. But Blake, let's dive into this and I'm gonna give the quick overview of what we're dealing with. This Tulsi Gabbard DNI story is truly Explosive. I believe Blake has a contrarian take, but essentially what happened here is Dni Tulsi Gabbard is alleging that after President Trump won the 2016 election that President Barack Obama and his top officials, including James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey, Susan Rice, they engaged in a, quote, unquote treasonous conspiracy to undermine President Trump's presidency. She claims that they manufactured intelligence, they created a false intelligence report claiming that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump despite earlier intelligence briefings and conclusions that said the opposite. There was this now famous infamous December 9th meeting where Obama directed his officials to produce a new intelligence assessment. And this intelligence assessment was ultimately released on January 6th and it contradicted the prior reports about Russian interference. Then they leaked these claims to the Washington Post, NBC New York Times, pushing the narrative that Russia interfered and influenced the election outcome. Here's the kicker. They used the Steele dossier, according to Tulsi Gabbard, to build this new assessment. Obviously the Steele dossier has been completely debunked, is an act of fiction. This, she says, resulted in a years long coup. Gabbard calls this effort to delegitimize President Trump's victory leading to the Mueller investigation ultimately, you could argue, to impeachment, to impeachments. Arrests of officials, heightened U.S. russian tensions. I mean, the implications of what happened here are extraordinarily far reaching. And she calls it a years, years long coup. And now she has handed over the documents to the GOJ and she's calling for prosecutions. Now Democrats, of course, are downplaying it. Jim Heinz, Senator Mark Warner have dismissed these claims as baseless. So what does it all mean? I tend to fall on the side of skeptical positivity, that we could actually be seeing some accountability here. But I'm skeptical because we've yet to really see accountability across our government. And all the scandals and all the conspiracy theories that have been proven correct after the fact. Blake, I want you to paint both a positive and a negative. Give us, give the audience what could result from this and why you think that there might be some speed bumps ahead.

[Stephen Miller]

Sure thing, Andrew. So the basic narrative as you laid out is she's kind of taken stuff that I believe it's mostly things we already had seen before. I can't recall what, which parts are exactly new that they're bringing out. But what she's highlighting is that in the lead up to the 2016 election, we had intelligence briefings that said it's unlikely Russia can basically change the outcome of the election. And Then she says the Russia hoax stuff afterwards was basically an attempt to rewrite this to bring down the administration. Now, I guess the. The positive version of it would be that if they bring this investigation, they can. Well, first of all, it's a good excuse to sort of just delve into every. Sorry. To delve into everything that they've ever. That ever happened in the Obama administration. You can bring up more CAA documents, more FBI documents. Maybe you can find things that they missed before in the prior inspector general investigations, and you can get them on false statements. I remember a few weeks ago, we had the story that they were looking at possible false statements by Brennan, by Comey, before Congress, and maybe they would bring before Congress. And I mean, we've known Brennan 100% perjured himself to Congress long ago on things like drones spying on Americans and stuff. So they've already lied to Congress about those things. We might be out of the statute of limitations on those things.

[Andrew Colvett]

Blake, just to pause real quick, what would so say this comes to nothing, right? DNI Gabbard's accusations, allegations here come to nothing. Fixate on the FISA lies, which we know, which is proven. He perjured himself before Congress. Don't even worry about the statute of limitations here. What would accountability look like? What's a reasonable expectation? This guy goes to jail for 20 years, dies in prison, or gets a fine, gets his passport revoked. Like what? I mean, think in terms of what's realistic.

[Stephen Miller]

I mean, federal. Let me look at what the federal perjury statute is. If we got him on that one. So, like, if we check just the general perjury, it's five years. Looking here at the, you know, the US Code. So that might be like, that's kind of the maximum. Most federal penalties have pretty wide range there. So in theory, yeah, you could indict these guys. Although I'll note Tulsi's not saying perjury. She's saying treasonous conspiracy. Now, I would first of all caution people, that is very difficult.

[Andrew Colvett]

Stephen Miller is saying seditious conspiracy.

[Stephen Miller]

Either way. I mean, treasonous conspiracy. Treason's defined in the Constitution as specifically levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies. I think it would be a big stretch to suddenly just stretch that to basically just saying, well, they're undermining the administration, and so that's treasonous. Frankly, that is exactly why we wrote that provision in the Constitution that way, because the old English governments loved to use the law that way. And the Founders didn't care for that I think it would be a big reach to try to bring a case like that. And frankly, I just don't think it would work. And I think it's also important to flag political difficulties to this. I mean, they're definitely highlighting Obama here. Obviously, President Trump has his differences with President Obama, but I think it's worth reminding people, broadly speaking, Obama's pretty popular with most Americans. And I think it could end up being a distraction if they're trying to drag Obama into court for his actions at the very end of his presidency because they're mad about how they handled an election that Trump won a decade ago. So that's kind of my gut feeling. We can kind of debate this back and forth.

[Andrew Colvett]

Yeah, I mean, I just have a wildly different emotional, visceral take from this. I want to, we have to guard against our emotions, think rationally, prudently. So Blake and I actually really appreciate, sometimes I tend to be a gas pedal and you can be my brake sort of thing. And so I fully appreciate where you're coming from and I want to see this thing clear eyed. However, I think to one critical Pandora's box getting ripped open. Right? And nobody wants to live in a country constantly convulsed by legal infighting amongst, where we're trying to throw people in prison all the time. This is not the America you or I grew up in. We don't want that to be the case. But here's the problem. They tried to throw President Trump in prison for 700 years. They tried to bankrupt him. They impeached him twice. They, they raided his home.

[Stephen Miller]

Hold on. We are dealing with who's, who's they though, because Obama didn't do that.

[Andrew Colvett]

That's true. But Obama started a lot of the precedent if, if, if the allegations are proven true that he actually directed this based on, and directed the intel community to give him a different assessment. Apparently, hours before the, the original assessment was about to be published, they pulled it based on new direction. The new direction apparently is directly tied to Obama. Now we don't even have to go after Obama. Okay? There is James Clapper, Brennan, there's Comey, there's Susan Rice. There's put up the shady bunch clip right where they've got the image here. I mean, President Trump's putting this out, right? Valerie Jarrett. There was a lot of people in this meeting. And one of the reasons that this is infuriating, I think, to so many people and why we want to see actual accountability is again, because what they did to President Trump and the egregiousness of their actions, the fact that there was no line, the fact that there was no prudence in the way that they went about things, and they lost. They lost bad. And so that should also be a lesson to us that we don't want to get over our skis and make allegations that ultimately backfire on us. So I want to. I want to guard against that. But I do believe that there has to be actionable offenses here because of what ultimately happened. The Russia, Russian Russia narrative spread like wildfire on purpose because they leaked it. They used the Steele dossier in order to do it, which has been completely discredited, which paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign as compromise, as. Not even compromise, as sort of like ginning up fake stories, and it turned out to be completely and utterly false. And yet our nation was dragged into the mud for a very, very long time as a result. All right, go ahead, Blake.

[Stephen Miller]

Yeah, so, yeah, so we were discussing there just, you know, whether this is ultimately, like, worthwhile. I would. I guess I always want to advise caution on these things. First of all, this is. This is delving back a long time. A decade is a long time ago in U.S. politics. You know, it'd be like if, man, it would be like if, like, the Obama administration was investigating stuff that happened at the end of the Clinton administration or if you were suddenly, you know, if we were suddenly dredging up stuff from 1992 after 9, 11, this.

[Andrew Colvett]

But. But, Blake, because President Trump won, then he was not. Then Biden took over, and now he's back again. It feels like one cohesive storyline. Do you know what I mean? Like, it's all very connected.

[Stephen Miller]

This is real life. It's not. It's not a Netflix show, like, okay, storylines. But in the end, this would be. This is litigating something where they're mad about a failed. Remember, a failed effort to maybe, like, undo the 2016 election.

[Andrew Colvett]

This is my pushback. It didn't fail because it dragged the country into the mud. It. It completely derailed, at least in part, President Trump's first term. But.

[Stephen Miller]

Dragging the country into a political dispute is not a crime. It is not.

[Andrew Colvett]

But when it leads to special counsels like Robert Mueller.

[Stephen Miller]

Did Mueller indict Trump?

[Andrew Colvett]

Nope, he didn't, thankfully, because there was no there there. But this is. The point, is that it was clear from. From the intel assessment originally that there was no there there. And yet they created a narrative to say there was a there there.

[Stephen Miller]

I want to flag that, too. So this is another thing where I could, I think they could get in trouble if they chase this too hard. Yeah. So again, if you get false statements on Brennan, like, I kind of hate Brennan. I kind of hate Clapper. I think it'd be nice to see them, like, kind of squirm in a, you know, in the really hate them. They're just nasty.

[Andrew Colvett]

I don't kind of hate them, but.

[Stephen Miller]

But, yes, but then that's like a narrow and specific thing. And I think if they're going to go for something, they've got to go for something narrow, precise, specific. And I can elaborate more on this.

[Blake Neff]

Ask 10 people to define the word capitalism. How many different responses do you think you'll get? This is a word that comes up all the time. But does anyone know what it really means? Do you? Hillsdale College offers more than 40 free online courses. That's right, free online courses on subjects like the book of Genesis, the rise and fall of the Roman Empire, the history of the ancient Christian Church. It's hard for me to even say which is my personal favorite. You guys have got to take these online courses. They've recently launched a new course, Understanding Capitalism, that I've been watching. In seven lectures, you'll learn about the role of profit and loss, how human nature plays a part in our economic system, why capitalism depends on private property rights, the rule of law, and above all, freedom, and why capitalism is ultimately a system that encourages morality rather than undermines it. Right now, go to charlieforhillsdale.com to enroll. There's no cost and it's easy to get started. That's charlieforhillsdale.com to register. C H-A R L I E for hillsdale.com.

[Andrew Colvett]

All right, Blake, you're saying we should be a little bit more cautious. I actually agree with you. I agree with caution. I am still, I think, channeling a lot of the emotions that our base and our audience is feeling because, yes, it was 2016, 2017, and we're all the way in 2025 now, but this all feels like yesterday to all of us. And we lived through what was so unprecedented. And it feels like these are the people responsible for dragging the nation through such a traumatic and unnecessary experience that resulted in Robert Mueller that probably led to two impeachments. You could make the argument at least. Maybe not a direct line, but it certainly is part of it. And we've got the DNI of saying this is a years long coup and treasonous conspiracy. So you're saying be cautious. I appreciate it and make your point because I Think it's important.

[Stephen Miller]

Well, so one thing I really want to highlight is there's a bit of a sleight of hand going on with what Tulsi Gabbard says in her post, because let me bring it up here. So when she's summarizing her stuff on X, this is where she posted it last Friday. The stuff she's highlighting before the election where she's using this to argue that they changed course. So, for example, on September 9th, there's a presidential daily briefing and it says, we agree Russia probably is not and will not be trying to influence the election by using cyber means to manipulate computer enabled election infrastructure. And similarly, on December 7, they have these talking points from James Clapper. We assess that foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome this year. We have no evidence of cyber manipulation of election infrastructure intended to alter results. So that's what she's flagging as, you know, the evidence of what they really believed was going on. And then she says that on December 8, they suddenly pivoted to this new, they're handling all, they're looking at the evidence again. And then they put out, in early January, they put out new talking points that basically amount to see, do I have it here? Like they were prepared to produce an assessment per the President's request. And then basically what they said is that they're looking like Russia. You know, Russia interfered in the election, they did the Russia hack. But when they pivot to this, they actually never say, Russia, we've changed our mind, Russia changed election results. They, you can go and look at the articles. They explicitly say Russia didn't do that. What they say is they went into the big picture supposed Russian collusion scandal, which was that Russia wanted Trump to win, so they did other stuff, or that Russia had contacts with the Trump administration. And so that's how we got the entrapment of General Flynn. That's how we got, we got the whole Russia collusion thing. That's what Russia collusion meant. That the bogus idea that the Trump campaign was literally actively working with Vladimir Putin Russians, that was total nonsense. That was total woo. That was total bs. But that is not what is being said in these early memos that are being treated as the smoking gun. They're kind of taking two things that are different.

[Andrew Colvett]

I agree with you. I agree with you. And they might have been so crafty in this, Blake, that they'll end up getting away with it. Right, because it's so. But, but the way that I see it is that it's two sides of the same coin. They're not, they're not going to come out instantly in an intel assessment and say Trump coordinated with Russia. That would have been, I think, a misstep on their part. And I think they probably knew that the smarter play was to say Russia was certainly doing this. And so I see it as a conspiracy because they're already looking at the Russian Steele dossier here. They're taking pieces of it, leaking the narrative to the press and ceding it. And then the rest of the work is done by the media and by talking heads on tv. And next thing you know, Trump is colluding with Russia. Okay? So Russia is certainly trying to collude or is trying to influence us according to their fake assessment, to alter the election results, which they weren't. So now, so they, the intel community does their part and it's very easy for the mind to then fill in the blank that Trump is, is colluding with the Russians to do this. So my out. My, my point is, is that, yeah, maybe this, maybe, maybe they were being a little cute and they were being, I don't know, they were holding back, going all the way to saying Trump had something to do with it. But ultimately that's exactly what the story became. Why did it become, become, become? That is because they had seeded the ground, they had absolutely inserted into the zeitgeist that Trump and Russia together in harmony, and that ended up derailing and completely distracting President Trump. You had Hillary Clinton calling him an illegitimate president for years. I don't know if she's still saying. She probably is, Blake. I think it's important if we just got to hear Tulsi in her own words here. So let's go ahead and play. Cut 252 Tulsi Gabbard.

[Tulsi Gabbard]

Over 100 documents that we released on Friday really detail and provide evidence of how this treasonous conspiracy was directed by President Obama just weeks before he was due to leave office after President Trump had already gotten elected. This is not a Democrat or Republican issue. This is an issue that is so serious it should concern every single American because it has to do with the integrity of our Democratic republic.

[Andrew Colvett]

Treasonous conspiracy. I mean, she's coming out guns a blazing and listening. Again, I want to reiterate, I appreciate the fact that you're, you're urging caution here because I tend to agree with you. We're not going to get everything we want. And there is a segment of the base that's not going to be happy until we see, you know, Anthony Fauci and Brennan, like, you know, strung up from their entrails or something like, I mean, so it's like, I'm not saying that that's what's going to happen. You're saying, hey, the statute, maybe it's a five year prison sentence. I think we should push to get some accountability here, because I do think what they did was completely out of bounds. I think it was completely out of line and it ended up having these tremendous downstream effects. And there needs to be accountability on our ic. There just simply has to be. Blake.

[Stephen Miller]

Well, it's just, I think, first of all, I think we should appreciate that they, we saw the outcome of attempting to just basically gin up ways to put your political opposition in prison. And it was Donald Trump got elected again last November. They made him a lot more powerful. They basically guaranteed he would be the nominee, and it exploded in their faces. And he, you know, he won the popular vote, won more states than ever before. So there's clearly, like, some potential political downsides to this sort of thing.

[Andrew Colvett]

But I, but I, but I, but I think that that's partly because President Trump is just a singular, unique political phenomenon that wouldn't be cowed by this and didn't stop fighting any other era. I mean, if you just go back a few different iterations of Republican presidential nominees, they would not have done this. Trump is singular in that. And so just because he was able to overcome all of this, everything that was thrown at him is, I think, more of a testament to him and his willpower and his courage than it is to sort of saying, hey, this backfired because it's a dumb thing to do. It very well could have been a very smart thing to do. It just didn't work out for him this time.

[Stephen Miller]

So, again, I would encourage everyone to kind of pause and let's look at what we're saying here. It was a treasonous conspiracy because we were distracted by this in 2017, 2018. Getting distracted is not a crime. It's actually, it's the sort of, it's a very vague, like, frankly, it almost sounds kind of sinister. And I think you'll have trouble selling that to the American public that, you know, these people committed a treasonous conspiracy because, like, people were watching it on the news and they got really irritated by it, or, like, because we got a special counsel. Well, Obama didn't appoint the special counsel. Comey didn't appoint the special counsel. The Trump administration appointed the special counsel.

[Andrew Colvett]

You know Rod Rosenstein.

[Stephen Miller]

Rod Rosenstein, as directed by Jeff Sessions. And I think we can agree that was a mistake, but it wasn't something that they did. And similarly, it happened because of the firing of Comey, which they didn't do. President Trump did that. And fair enough, it's muddling things.

[Andrew Colvett]

Those are good pushbacks. Those are good pushbacks. But it wasn't just distraction. It was completely undermining the legitimacy of the 45th President of the United States. But it's good pushback, Blake.

[Blake Neff]

Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk here, a close friend of mine just saved tens of thousands of dollars on his Medicare. And I want you to know how to. Medicare enrollment is a maze of misinformation and it's no accident. The more confused you are, the easier it is for Big Insurance to steer you into overpriced plans that make them more money. Trump's Department of Justice sued three of the biggest brokers in America for allegedly doing just that. Fortunately, there is a way to fight back. I trust Chapter. They're honest and they're independent. Chapter's licensed advisors search every single Medicare option to find what is best for you. My friend made one simple 30 minute phone call and now he's saving tens of thousands going forward and is fully covered. The call is 100% free. No pressure, just real honest help. People are relieved when they speak with Chapter. I trust Chapter. They're honest and they're independent. So if you're turning 65 or already on Medicare, call Chapter today, dial £250 and say, Charlie, to speak with a trusted Medicare advisor. That's £250 and say, Charlie, it could save you thousands of.

[Andrew Colvett]

We are waiting Senator Rick Scott to join us. We're gonna be talking about Senate appointments with Senator Scott. I wanna play just a little bit more tape of Tulsi and what she's alleging. Let's go ahead and play cut254.

[Tulsi Gabbard]

The seriousness of, again, the implications and the consequences of these actions that were taken demand accountability. The American people not only deserve the truth and accountability. When we look at the future of our country as a democratic republic and the American people's ability to have faith that when they go and cast a vote at the ballot box, that the will of the people will be respected by those in government, whether they be Democrats or Republicans. This is literally what is at stake here. So we are referring all of our documents to the Department of Justice for the purpose of accountability and action. There must be accountability. The truth must be shown to the American people in order to ensure that there is this faith and trust and integrity in our democratic republic for the sake of the future of our country.

[Andrew Colvett]

There is Dni Tulsi Gabbard calling for accountability and a sentiment I know many of you in the audience feel. I personally feel it gotta wait for all the facts to come out. We don't want to get over our skis or ahead of ourselves. Here to help make sense of that, and we're also gonna get into Senate confirmations is Senator Rick Scott from the great state of Florida, a great friend of the show and a great patriot. Senator, welcome to the show. Thanks for your time this morning. Really quickly, just reflect on the allegations that are coming out of Dni Tulsi Gabbard. I know you lived through this firsthand, just like the rest of us make. What's your take on what's happening?

[Rick Scott]

It doesn't. First off, it makes sense. The first thing you always think about in life. Okay, does this make sense? Right. I think what Tulsi said made a lot of sense. And so I hope my goal is we get to the bottom of it and let's find out. But it never made sense, this Russian hoax. It always seemed like it was all fabrication to hurt Trump and hurt Republicans. And so I'm glad Tulsi is doing her job in bringing this out, and I hope we have a thorough investigation. Let's get the facts out.

[Andrew Colvett]

Yeah, absolutely. And you know, President Trump is like a dog with a bone on this. His truth social is going off calling him the shady bunch. No one's above the law with clips of Obama saying that, you know, it's gonna be a fascinating next couple days. I know she's saying that there's going to be further announcements in the coming days. And I know you guys are gonna be all over that. Let's pivot really quick here, Senator. You know, President Trump had a truth out and he said, hopefully, the very talented John Thune, fresh off our many victories over the past two weeks and indeed six months, will cancel August recess and long weekends. In order to get my incredible nominees confirmed, we need them badly signed djt Senator, for the uninitiated, the unaware. What, what is the. What's the August recess? What are these long weekends? This feels like a friendly jab at Senator Senate leader soon.

[Rick Scott]

Well, first, first off, here's what's happened. The Democrats have decided they're going to slow down all confirmation on the Senate floor of Trump nominees. What that means is by doing that, they can. They can only allow us to do a vote on a nominee every two hours. Okay. So that way you would think. Well, think how many hours there's 24 hours in a day, right? Well, no, no, no, no, no. We don't work that many days. I mean, our first vote on Mondays is at 5:30. I was shocked. I mean, I'm a guy, I'm a business guy. I worked 80 hours a week my whole life. So we come in, we start at 5:30 on Mondays, PM, not AM okay. And then we generally finish on 145 on, on Thursdays. So. And we don't do, we don't start, you know, early in the morning. So number one is we could work five days a week, we could work weekends and we could work longer hours. That would be the number one. Number two is we're. This year we're scheduled. I think it's 40 weeks out of the 52 weeks to be in D.C. now in theory, the other 12 weeks you're gonna be at home working. But you know, some people will take vacations. So in August, we're typically off all of August. We usually have a four. That's our biggest break. It's a four week break. That's where people go, either go on vacation, they travel at home and visit the constituents, or travel around the world like, you know, going to other countries to meet with the political and military leaders. So what, what the President is saying is get my nominees done. You can work five days a week, you can work weekends, or you can cancel your, your recess. I agree with him. Let's get to work. That's my slogan, Andrew. That was my slogan when, when I ran in 2010. Let's get to work. That's what I've always believed. I believe in working.

[Andrew Colvett]

That's great. I mean, that's fantastic. So we know that you're a hard worker. We know that you're a successful businessman because of that, what you did in Florida. But also explain the, I mean, because I think for the general public, we looked at, okay, we got Gabbard and Hegseth and Marco Rubio. We got all these guys confirmed. We got the cabinet appointed much quicker than we did in Trump 1.0. What kind of positions do we need to be looking to fill with these Senate confirmations? Explain kind of tier one, tier two, tier three.

[Rick Scott]

Well, for all the agencies, we have under secretaries for, for State, for Defense, we have undersecretaries that have to be confirmed. That's number one. Number. Number two is we have ambassadors that have to be confirmed. Number three is we have Judges that have to be confirmed. Number four, we have U.S. attorneys have to be confirmed. Next, we have U.S. marshals that have to be confirmed. So I think, Andrew, this might be off a little bit, but I think we have about 900 people that need to be confirmed. Where we're now we have they first go through a committee. So we have somewhere between 150, 160 people that have already gone through the committee process. And so they're waiting for the confirmation on the Senate floor. Historically, all right, before Trump, you know, the, you know, the Democrats would allow you to do a batch of them because it's, some of these people have come through with, you know, UNAM's consent out of a committee, things like that. There's no controversy in them. It's not like a Supreme Court judge, things like that. So, but the Democrats, they're sitting here, number one, they're the ones slowing this down. But we've got to, you know, we've got to, we got a sticker. We got to, we got to start coming in earlier, working later, working weekends if we have to, if we have to cancel recess, cancel recess.

[Andrew Colvett]

I think, you know, I speak for our audience, Senator, that we agree the Senate schedule is an abomination. Can, can, can Leader Thune, can he simply just change the rules? Like how much power does he have to cancel August recess or to extend to a five day work week? So you're not leaving at Thursday, you know, at 4:00'. Clock.

[Rick Scott]

So the leader of the Senate right now, majority leaders, as John Thune, he decides our schedule. Now here's his limitation. Senators have to stay here so he can say we're going to be here. And people say, well, I'm not going to show up, then there's nothing he can do about it. So number one, you know, we have to say we're going to stay here. And number two, people have to stay, stay, they have to say I'm not gonna, you know, I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna leave on Thursday at 1:45 after, you know, after, after that vote. I'm willing to stay on Fridays and Saturdays and Sundays and recess, whatever it is. So it takes both, it takes John Thune to say it and take senators to show up, Republican senators.

[Andrew Colvett]

Yeah, I was going to say if all the Democrats basically say, hey, we're not going to show up, but we get 53 Republicans, is that enough to, to keep going on with? If they just don't want to show up, that's their own problem. Right?

[Rick Scott]

Yeah. We can. If we. If, if. Yeah, the only thing, though. Yeah, so the, the value of the Democrats showing up is that maybe they'll, maybe at some point they'll say, hey, we'll let these go through quicker so we won't make a two hour wait for each one.

[Andrew Colvett]

Yeah. For the audience edification here. I mean, there, we need tons of these undersecretaries confirmed. It's a huge barrier to actually getting the Trump mandate and the agenda off the ground. And people don't realize that, yes, we've got the top, the top cabinet officials in place and that's huge. And they're setting the tone, but if they don't have people below them to execute on this agenda, it's going to be a massive, massive impediment to actually getting the agenda across.

[Rick Scott]

And judges and U.S. attorneys and U.S. marshals, ambassadors. There's old. Anyway, there's. Andrew, I think it's 100, and I'd have to look at the list. I think it's at least 150. Might be 160 people we're waiting for right now.

[Andrew Colvett]

My goodness. So the ball is in Leader Thune's court right now. The eyes of the nation, especially President Trump supporters, are on you, sir. Please, please, please. This is a. President Trump is giving friendly jabs right now. We're giving friendly jabs. Let's get the job done. We don't wanna have to turn up the heat, but we will. This is a huge, huge issue. It's not grabbing headlines like Tulsi Gabbard and Obamagate and things like that. It is massively important to the work of the country actually getting done. Real quick, sir. Senator, real quick, breaking news. Jerome Powell has just been referred to the DOJ for criminal charges for perjury related to his $2.5 billion renovation of the Federal Reserve building. Rep. Luna is alleging that Powell falsely downplayed the project's $600 million cost increase and denied the existence of luxury features like a VIP dining room and rooftop garden. So we're going to watch that.

[Rick Scott]

Andrew, that 2.5 trillion is more than it takes to build a football stadium. That's a renovation.

[Andrew Colvett]

Yeah.

[Rick Scott]

Okay. More than a football stadium.

[Andrew Colvett]

Yeah, No, I agree. I think it's an interesting one because we're talking about allegations of perjury on the cost of a building. But by the way, I'm not saying I'm against it in theory, because in principle, the budget overruns. You've got this. And I know this hits close to home. Senator, you've got Democrats in California. What was it supposed to be? 30 billion. It's there now they're saying it's 133 billion for this high, high speed rail. President Trump has now pulled the federal funding from that. I know in, in Florida, you, you rejected such a similar project.

[Rick Scott]

My first month in office, I mean, I had the same opportunity my first month in office. They were, they, Obama wanted me to build a high speed train that had to stop 15 times between Orlando and Tampa. Okay. It was going to cost the state at least a trillion dollars and lose $100 billion a year. Now, do you think that something I would do as a business guy.

[Andrew Colvett]

But climate change, Senator. But climate change, yeah, that's, I mean, the guy. Yeah. I mean, absolutely. Well, I mean, I'm glad they pulled the funding, but, and so, so when it comes to Powell, it's like, listen, I know we want him to get out. He's not lowering rates when the rest of the world is lowering rates and it's having a massive financial impact on our debt. Even so, I understand the impetus here. I just want to make sure that if we're going to, if we're going to criminalize budget overruns in D.C. i mean, the whole town's going to be locked up. So I just want to caution the audience a little bit in that final word. Senator, what are our marching orders? What do we need to get done in the next week? What do they, what do they need to keep their eyes on? 30 seconds.

[Rick Scott]

Right. Right now what we're going to be doing is we're starting the appropriations process. So be very. Have high expectations that we're heading towards a balanced budget. Trump wants a balanced budget. We've got to balance the budget or we'll not see lower interest rates, will not see inflation under control. That's the biggest issue we got to deal with right now.

[Andrew Colvett]

Amen. The affordability crisis is massive. And Senator, just, just to make sure we keep our eyes on the prize here, when we talk to young people, it's all about they can't own homes, they can't start families. We need to address that. Thank you for your time, Senator. We're always honored to have you. Thank you so much, Andrew.

[Rick Scott]

Nice seeing you.

[Blake Neff]

Private student loan debt in America totals about $300 billion. Why refi refinances private student loan debt and they do not care what your credit score is. Many clients aren't even able to make the minimum monthly payment on their private student loans when they first contact yrefi. Go to yrefi.com that is yrefy.com youm don't have to ignore that mountain of student loan statements on your kitchen table anymore. So go to yrefi.com do you have a co borrower? Well why Refi can get them released from the loan and you can give mom or dad a break. Go to yrefi.com can you imagine being debt free and not living under this burden anymore? So go to yrefi.com that is yrefy.com let's face it, if you have distress or defaulted private student loans, there's no better place to go than y refi. They provide you with a custom loan payment based on your ability to pay. They're not a debt settlement company. So check it out right [e-mail] may not be available in all 50 states. Go to yrefi.com that is yrefy.com foreign.

[Andrew Colvett]

Let'S go ahead and play a little Hunter Biden 279.

[Hunter Biden]

If I became president in two years from now or four years from now or three years from now, I would pick up the phone and call president of El Salvador and say you either send them back or I'm gonna invade crime. What they're doing, he's dictator thug.

[Andrew Colvett]

Bukele or Trump? Both. You know I wanted these clips and the whole team's like it's, it's just taking forever to edit out all the F words. This guy is a.

[Stephen Miller]

It sounds like we don't have like a working video. Like it's all like bugged out because he's swearing so much. We just have to, we actually should have like a beep sound thing. I think when they're really just cursing like I agree. Let's work the beeps to really like signal that.

[Andrew Colvett]

Let's work the beeps in the next, next time we get a clip from Hunter Biden 283.

[Hunter Biden]

He continues like all these Democrats say you have to talk about and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration. You how do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you have food on table? Who do you think washes your dishes? Who do you think does your garden? Who do you think is here by the sheer just grit and will that they figured out a way to get here because they thought that they could give themselves and their family better chance and he's somehow convinced all of us that these people are criminals.

[Andrew Colvett]

So Hunter Biden is the pure embodiment of this elite class of Americans that have never worked an honest day in their lives. And they expect that we can just throw away the entire country, ignore our immigration laws, ignore the border, ignore all the fentanyl that comes in, ignore all the crime. Ignores the fact that a CBP officer was just shot and in an attempted robbery in New York City when he was off duty by a. A foreign national from the Dominican Republic. These guys couldn't care less about you. They couldn't care less about what happens to your schools, your, your DMVs, your hospitals. They couldn't care less. And he is complete embodiment of the grotesque, corrupt, perverted nature of the D.C. and New York City ruling elite that have thrown this country into such turmoil and thrown you down, down the river. Blake, what's your take?

[Stephen Miller]

I think it's funny how he just trashes the Democratic Party like he's. James Clapper, hasn't won anything in ages. Dave Lakshelrod's terrible. Anita. Jake Tapper is terrible. I don't know if. Do we have that one ready yet, but if we don't like, it's pretty funny. I had a friend actually message, he sent me the clip and then he said, Vance Biden, 2028, which certainly is a funny visual image. Not, not actually, of course. I think we've. I think we've had enough cocaine in the White House for a while.

[Andrew Colvett]

But yeah, so here's actually his quote. He says F him and everybody around him. George Clooney is not a effing an actor. He's a brand. James Carville hasn't won a race in 40 effing years. David Axelrod had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama, and that was because of Barack Obama. The Pod Save America guys were junior effing speechwriters on Barack Obama's Senate staff who have been dining out on the relationships with him, making millions. Anita Dunn has made 40 to 50 million off the Democrat Party. What influence does Jake Tapper have over anything? He has the smallest audience on cable news. I mean, tough to argue with any of those points, Blake.

[Stephen Miller]

Yeah, that would be a point if that was a speech someone delivered, like at a turning point that would bring the House down. It would be amazing.

[Andrew Colvett]

Maybe not so many F words, okay, for the kids, but I mean, he is a foul mouthed, like, bitter drug addict and he sounds like one. Yeah, yeah. What else, what else are you gonna say? Okay, one other thing. I want to get to this clip. Obama is trying to take. He's trying to take ownership of the fact that he has that they villainized and belittled young men that they made a mistake in this 255 as, quote.

[Tulsi Gabbard]

Unquote, progressives, Democrats, progressive parents, enlightened ones. We've made that mistake sometimes in terms of our rhetoric, where it's like we're constantly talking about, you know, what's wrong with the boys instead of what's right with them. We rightly have tried to invest in girls to make sure that.

[Stephen Miller]

There'S a.

[Tulsi Gabbard]

Level playing field, and then they're not barred from opportunities. But we haven't been as willing, I think, to be intentional about investing in the boys, and that's been a mistake.

[Andrew Colvett]

Oh, he's, he's right. And thanks to their misstep, you might have delivered the presidency for a second time to President Trump because we actually gave a message of hope and opportunity to young men that have been villainized by the Democrat Party for far too long. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. We'll talk to you soon.

[Stephen Miller]

For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.

[Andrew Colvett]

Com.