Charlie Kirk (6:47)

It's unbelievable.

Bill Federer (6:48)

But, but the, the curveball is the majority of the tariffs were collected at southern ports. So the south, like Charleston, South Carolina, threatened many times to stop collecting the tariffs because they were in a position as an agricultural area of having to buy more expensive stuff from Europe or more expensive stuff, relatively from the northern factories. So the tariffs helped the northern factories, but really didn't help the South. So when the civil war started, the south held back their tariff income and the federal government was like, oh. So Lincoln pushed through an emergency income tax and it raised $750 million to finance the union during the civ. Civil war. And after the war, it was repealed, no income tax. Why? Because the south is now part of the union and we can go back to normal collecting tariffs at the southern ports. And so this was the way it was up until the late 1800s. It was 95% tariffs. This is what's called the Gilded Age. And you had all kinds of factories and bridges made out of steel and high rise. And, and, and if you've ever been to the state capitol in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, it was built around this time. It's a gilded masterpiece. I mean, it is the most. You feel like you're in some foreign palace. There was so much opulence and wealth in America at this time. And then even into the early 1900s, I wrote a book on George Washington Carver, the Tuskegee scientist from down south. And the United peanut growers association in 1921, asked Carver to go to the House ways and means committee and to lobby for a tariff on peanuts imported from China because they could bring them in from China cheaper than the southern farmers could grow them. And he was successful. They passed the 1922 Fordney McCumber tariff bill. And then there's the Smoot Hawley tariff bill of 1930.

Charlie Kirk (9:06)

But they say that the tariffs though, by the way. Let me just interrupt. It's an antiquated model of economics that even though we had it previously that tariffs should never be used. And so kind of blend this bill using some of your economic expertise with the historical. Is there a place for tariffs, looking at it through a historical and economic lens in the current American geopolitical portfolio?

Bill Federer (9:33)

Yeah, definitely. You know the move away from tariffs sort of snuck in the back door. You had Marxists from Germany immigrating to America and they wanted redistribution of wealth and so they pushed through the first income tax in a peacetime in 1892. But the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in Pollock vs. Farmers Loan and Trust. In the 1894 Supreme Court case, the Supreme Court said any legislation that discriminates based on race, religion or economic status is class legislation. It's sort of economic dei. We're going to tax people more because of their status. And. And the Supreme Court said no, it's unconstitutional. So what did Woodrow Wilson do? Amend the constitution with the 16th amendment in 1913. He actually tacked a 1% income tax on the top 1% richest people in the country onto the 1913 tariff bill. It's just going to tax the Rockefellers, Carnegie's J. Paul Gettys, Astors Flaglers, Harry Minns. It's not going to tax you and me. And then you had World War I and everybody said okay, we had an income tax during the emergency of the Civil War. Now it's emergency of World War I. And after the war they reduced it but did not eliminate it. But it was still a tax on the wealthy. You even had John F. Kennedy in his 1960 speech he said introduced during the war when the income tax was extended to millions of new taxpayers. Previously it had been a selective tax imposed on the wealthy. And then of course FDR had his greatest tax increase in world history.

Charlie Kirk (11:31)

You know one of the biggest lies being sold to American people right now is that you're in control of your money. Especially when it comes to crypto. But the truth, most of these so called crypto platforms are just banks in disguise. Fully capable of freezing your assets the moment some bureaucrat makes a phone call. That is not what bitcoin was built for. That's why I use Bitcoin.com. i just did a major transaction on it. They offer a self custodial wallet which means you hold the keys, you control your assets. No one can touch your crypto. Not the IRS or not a rogue bank, not some three letter agency that thinks it knows better than you do. This is how it was intended by the original creators of Bitcoin. Peer to peer money. Free from centralized control, free from surveillance, and free from arbitrary seizure. So if you're serious about financial sovereignty, go to bitcoin.com, set up your wallet, take back control. Because if you don't hold the keys, you don't own your money. Bitcoin.com freedom starts here.

Bill Federer (12:27)

So Franklin Roosevelt expanded the income tax to tax everybody. And Most people made $5,000 a year. They didn't save up money to pay it. And so FDR instituted paycheck withholding, an emergency effort. It was uncle Sam needs you. Buy war bonds and fight the Axis, Pay your taxes. The person that came up with it was Beardsley Rummel, chairman of Macy's department store. You know the Thanksgiving Day parade very well. And, and so it was called the pay as you go tax. But this created something called outsourcing. You squeeze the sponge, the water goes out. You raise the taxes on businesses in America. Guess what? They're going to go to other countries where the taxes are lower. So after World War II, we were helping to rebuild Germany and Japan with brand new equipment. And they have cheap labor. No lawsuits, no environmental red tape, no, none of that. And they could produce stuff really cheap and then ship it into America. And with the profits, they would lobby politicians to lower the tariffs so they could bring their stuff in cheaper. This is called free trade. Now, the problem was that other countries would subsidize their businesses to help them produce their goods cheaper so they could sell them cheaper and put out of business the American competition. And then once they had a monopoly, then they could flex their muscles when it came to negotiating foreign policy. We'll hold back what you need because we're the only ones giving it to you. And so we see that what Trump, in a sense, is wanting to do is to go back to the original model that did make America the wealthiest and most prosperous nation on the planet. And you're making other countries pay a premium to have access to our customers.

Charlie Kirk (14:37)

And so, yeah, let's, let's just kind of go a level deeper here. So you're a free market guy. Can you reconcile how to best explain those two things that we want? Open to markets, but also talk about China as well? You're a historian that understands the Chinese Communist Party. How do they view trade themselves as the middle empire? Give us a little bit of their psychology on how they're currently Viewing, let's say markets with America. It's not about enriching us, it's about something different. What is that?

Bill Federer (15:07)

Yeah, well, China is the oldest civilization in world history, goes back 5,000 years. They had dynasties, they've always had a top down controlled economy. And then you had the British and they colonized. And what happened was the British were growing opium in India and shipping it into China. And the Emperor didn't want it and fought back. And then the British brought their navy in. Well, the Chinese didn't have a navy and so they lost. And so it's called the Opium Wars. And this is when the, the British set up HSBC Bank, Hong Kong, Singapore bank, which was used basically to take the profits from selling the opium into, into China. Talk about a involved government involved in the drug trafficking. But this is called the century of humiliation for China. And they never forgot it. And they're sort of paying us back with saying, okay, we'll weaken the west with fentanyl and, and all kinds. But when you had Admiral Dewey opened up trade with China, but we had the most powerful navy in the world. You had, During World War II, America was defending China against Japan. We had the, the fighting Tigers and, and, but then you had Chiang Kai Shek, he converted and became a Christian maybe because he thought that that would get Americans to want to support him. And he's fighting the Japanese and fighting Mao Tse Tung in the Communists. And Harris Truman said we're going to pull out. MacArthur wanted to go in and defeat the Communists and he may, may have been able to do that because they were not all that organized. But, But Truman fired MacArthur and Truman helped form the United Nations. And Truman said, well, let's let the United nations take, take care of this. And it's like it didn't work out that way. So Chiang Kai Shek is chased out to Taiwan, Formosa, free China, whatever the name was. And the Communists took over China and they began to do a Cultural Revolution. Not just a revolution, but a cultural one, which means they were destroying thousands of years of Chinese culture. They destroyed the oldest gates, you know, in Beijing and the oldest Buddhist temple and tens of thousands of ancient Chinese works. And because they wanted to do the new People's Republic of China. And they play the long game. I heard somebody explain it, difference between chess and poker. But Americans are known for poker, taking risks and gambling. And the Chinese are very strategic.

Charlie Kirk (17:52)

Yeah, let's talk more about that. The long term planning of the Chinese Communist Party. How far out do they look and how Are they viewing this kind of trade war as a economic one or even something greater than that?

Bill Federer (18:10)

Well, the most popular game in China is called Go G O and it's like Chinese checkers with, with flat little marbles. But your goal is to get control of different parts of the playing board with the fewest amount of pieces necessary. And so it's very long term strategy. And so they apply this generationally. They do have a, what I could best describe as a manifest destiny. Right when America was first starting, we sort of knew we were going to go from sea to shining sea. And but China has this sort of corporate concept that they are the best and that they are going to grow and eventually take over. And to a large part, they've been successful primarily through bribing politicians in other countries. The China Silk Road Initiative, Turkistan.

Charlie Kirk (19:07)

They've always viewed themselves as the center of the world, as their natural place, which they feel they must regain.

Bill Federer (19:13)

Yeah, it's, it's a psyche that's there. So I think they've been rattling their sword that they wanted to take back Taiwan and of course they did get Hong Kong back, which was a tremendous abandonment of the freedom loving people there. But Trump I feel is brilliant because when he threw them on their heels with this tariff war, so to speak, 40 Chinese banks have gone belly up just within the last two months. They've had to pull back. They've, their, their global aspirations have taken a hit partly because they've bought a whole lot of treasury bills and so they, and if they attack America, they're going to lose their customer. Right, because, because we're the ones that America is the market for the world. And so if, if they do anything to, to collapse America, they're going to have nobody to buy their product. And so they're going to be hurt that way. So they're in sort of a box and Trump is probably the only person on the planet that has the guts to push back against their agenda. If you look at the, the Hutcheson Wempole Company, who, which is a Chinese owned company, they've been strategically taking control of major maritime ports, you know, Panama Canal, the Dardanelles, different areas around the world that are chokepoints for naval travel around the world, it's like, why are they doing that? The Bahamas, they built a deep water port down there. And then in Africa they go to countries and say, well, yeah, that's right.

Charlie Kirk (20:47)

No, sorry to interrupt. What would you say is their weakness if you were to advise President Trump? Because you know this very well, what is the weak point of China. That is a card that we could play.

Bill Federer (20:59)

Well their, their population is, is unsustainable. They you know the fewer women go back to the one child policy they used to have and they would all want men and the overstretched their themselves so that they are vulnerable I think financially they, they have a good front militarily they do have some advanced things and supposedly hypersonic missiles and so forth but very few. The American military out out numbers the Chinese almost 10 to 1. So, so they're not ready to engage in anything. They are trying to do what's called bricks. Brazil, Russia, China, India, you know and Singapore, whatever. I always get the s mixed up. But they've added these are countries that want to trade with something other than the US dollar and they've gotten a little headway but I don't think it's anywhere near competitive.

Charlie Kirk (22:07)

Private student loan debt so many Americans feel stuck and helpless. They are the sponsor of our campus tour. They are great people. You can finally take control of your student loan situation@yrefi.com that is yrefy.com they provide you with a custom loan payment based on your ability to pay. Yrefi is not a debt settlement company and they work with each borrower individually tailoring each loan to each borrower's specific situation. You'll not be calling a faceless call center. Yrefi can reduce your monthly payment and guarantees interest rates under 6%. Why refi does not care what your credit score is. Go to yrefi.com that is yrefy.com so take a look at it right now at yrefi.com why refi refinances distress and defaulted private student loans which are different from federal loans. They offer a three minute rate check. So I want you to think right now maybe you have private student loan debt. Maybe your friend does, maybe your neighbor got to check it out. Yrefi.com, yrefy.com can you imagine being debt free and not burdened anymore? Go to y refi.com may not be available in all 50 states. Why? Refi.com.

Bill Federer (23:14)

That brings up another interesting scenario. FDR on his way back from the altar conference stops off his USS Quincy boat in the Suez Suez Canal and he meets with the king of Saudi Arabia, Aziz IBN Saud. And they do an oil for security agreement that America will provide security for Saudi Arabia in exchange for Saudi Arabia selling its oil in US dollars. The number one commodity sold worldwide is oil. And when everybody in the world is having to buy oil in US dollars. And since Saudi Arabia is the biggest seller of it, one of the biggest, then everybody wants US Dollars. And so we're able to be the reserve currency for the world. Biden let that slip and that, that's dangerous because if, if it ever happens that we're not the reserve currency, there'll be lots of dollars that have been created that nobody needs and then the inflation could go through the roof. I think Trump is, is very effectively trying to push back against that. And then you had the Bretton woods Agreement around 1948, Harry S. Truman that made the international agreement that the US dollar would be the reserve currency for the world backed with gold. It was secure. Everybody said, hey, you can put your, your money in dollars. And you know it's, it's the most safest. Until Richard Nixon got us off the gold standard. But even then it was still responsibly managed. But then under Biden and Obama and the spending, spending the trillions and trillions of dollars, we're the most in debt nation in the.

Charlie Kirk (24:57)

Can a nation survive the amount of debt that we've accumulated?

Bill Federer (25:04)

Not without a miracle. So I've written several books. One of them is called Change to Change. I go through all the world's history and I track empires. Debt is always the precursor to an empire collapsing. The Roman Empire, it expanded, expanded. But then when Hadrian built its wall, it was this far and no further. And they had to live within their means and they couldn't and they got in debt and then they ended up collapsing. The Spanish empire was getting gold from America, but they were spending it as fast as they got it. And when they lost their Spanish Armada in 1588 trying to attack England, then they lost another armada a few years later and then another one. Spain went bankrupt and they couldn't maintain their global empire. And that's when you know, England and France and others began to settle colonies in America. France Under Louis the 14th became the biggest empire in the world. But then France helped us with our revolutionary war. Thank you. But what did they get in return? Nothing but debt. You fight a war, you should get something in return. They didn't get any trade agreement, they just got nothing but debt. And then a couple years of crops failed and France went bankrupt and they had a French revolution and it collapsed. You look at the Ottoman Empire and it expanded and was it would only it would tax the non Muslims and after centuries the non Muslims turned into very small minorities and the tax base was gone. And then the Ottoman Empire fell and Then how did we get rid of the Soviet Union? The arms race. Reagan was spending on military. Russia tried to keep up and they couldn't and they took all their money out of their GDP and put it in the military and they collapsed. And so we have been doing to ourselves voluntarily what we did to the Soviets to collapse them. We got them to spend, spend, spend, and they went in debt and collapsed and here we are. So, so we're. Debt is fat to the body politic. What's fat? Well, you eat something you shouldn't and, and then it turns into a fat cell and you got to carry it around. It's not a brain cell, it's not a muscle cell. It doesn't add anything to you, but you got to keep it alive. But what's debt? Well, you spend what you shouldn't have and you have interest and you got to keep paying that interest. It doesn't add anything to you. Just so America is like a 400 pound patient on the emergency room table. And the Democrat comes in and says, I think you can handle another £100 of debt. We can keep this spending going. And, and Trump's like, we need to put in some stints, we need to do some radical, you know, surgery here. We need to cut back on this. And so America is at a very vulnerable spot. Trump is trying to fix it. You know, I did a book on the history of socialism and a socialist tactic is you get a country to go into debt and then when they're destabilized, they also add in pitting groups against each other, victims and oppressors, and, but then they destabilize the country and then everybody cries out for the government to help. And the government says, well, help, we're just going to take control of your lives. But you look at the countries that fell behind the Iron Curtain, they were all destabilized and debt was a chief factor in that. So, so Trump's trying to turn things around. If I think, if he, you know, Kennedy talks about that, he says if we could cut taxes, it will spur economic growth and then we'll be able to get our economy growing again. And so Trump's taking this attitude of let's free up individuals so they can keep their money and then the economy can grow. In one of my, the books, I did a book called the Interesting History of Income Tax, and John F. Kennedy talks about FDR's high taxes and how they've been chasing money out of the country and doing this outsourcing. So February 6, 1960, 1, Kennedy said, I've asked the Secretary of Treasury to report on whether present tax laws may be stimulating in undue amounts the flow of American capital to industrial countries abroad. Right. You squeeze a sponge, the water goes out. Kennedy said April 20, 1961. In those countries where income taxes are lower than in the United States, the ability to defer the payment of US Tax by retaining income in subsidiary companies provides a tax advantage for companies operating through overseas subsidiaries that is not available to companies operating solely in the United States. And so he says, we need to give tax cuts to businesses. The caveat is to businesses that are on American soil. And he says, a tax cut. This is September 3rd, 1963, JFK. A tax cut means higher family income, higher business profits, a balanced federal budget. Every taxpayer in his family will have more money left over after taxes for a new car, a new home, new convenience, education, investment. Every businessman can keep a higher percentage of his profits in his cash register or put it to work expanding his business. And as the national income grows, the federal government will ultimately end up with more revenue. So if you cut taxes, people will have more money and they'll spend it, and then the factories will have to hire more workers to meet the increased demand. Right. And so the idea is that you can stimulate the economy through cutting taxes and again, at the same time replacing that with tariff income.

Charlie Kirk (30:50)

So taking a step back with all of this, the direction that President Trump is heading with tariffs and national security, how do you place him in the list of American presidents on the macro of what he's trying to achieve and the realignment, trying to really consolidate our hemisphere? How would you judge it? How would you grade it? How would you compare it?

Bill Federer (31:12)

I would say he's one of the best presidents ever. I really believe that. You see a concentration of power that takes place, and he is trying to cut the size of government. It's like, who does that? I've never seen in studying all the presidents. You know, FDR concentrated power with his New Deal programs during the Depression and then World War II. And he hired and then he gets out. Eisenhower Republican gets in. Eisenhower hires Clarence Mannion, the dean of the Notre Dame Law School. His job is to go through all of the concentrating of power that FDR put in place and basically do doge, what can we do to trim back all this stuff? And he comes up with a great list. But all the Rhinos had gotten to Eisenhower and said, look, look, wait a second, we're in charge. It's okay to have big government because the Republicans are in charge of it. And so they basically let Clarence Mannion go. And he pioneered the conservative movement that Eddie Rickenbacker became a part of. And then Phyllis Schlafly and then all the rest of us sort of followed along, but that was Eisenhower and then. And he gave a cryptic address at the end of his term and he warns of the military industrial establishment, but that was his words for the deep state. It's like there are some people here and they got their own agenda and they're wanting to. So Trump comes along and he's like, I want to cut the size of.

Charlie Kirk (32:48)

Government has so really quick. I'm sorry to interrupt, Bill, we're short on time. Has any president last 100 years actually made that a stated goal and been successful to curtail the Leviathan?

Bill Federer (32:59)

A few, believe it or not, Andrew Jackson was the only president who paid off the national debt. And that brings up a whole nother thing. You had the John Maynard Keynes, he's a friend of, you know, FDR's and it was debt stimulated economy. So here we are, depression. And he comes up with this idea, hey, it's okay for the government to go in debt to spend money in the private sector to create jobs. Those jobs will pay taxes and the taxes will pay off the debt. Sounds good on a chalkboard. Chalkboard. But it never gets implemented because every generation of Congress, right, says, hey, let's go in more debt so I can funnel money to my district to get votes and then we'll let the other, the next Congress decide how to pay it off. And so that's how there's even a guy named Buchanan, James Buchanan, and he won the Nobel Prize in economics in 1980 because he discovered what I just told you, that politics. He's an economist. It's like, why are these guys getting us in debt, these congressmen? And he noticed that whenever they're up for reelection, they vote to increase the debt. And so he says politicians will do anything to get reelected. And so. And they hate trimming back the spending because they got to go back to their district and say, hey, no more pork projects. But so what Trump is doing, actually cutting back the fat, trimming it, getting rid of deep state. You're. He's coming up against not just Democrats, but Rhino Republicans and people that have been entrenched in this government spending. But I think he's going to be successful and I'm praying that he's successful. And I think that's why we have to support him. It may take, like Thomas Jefferson said, it May be the duty of all of us to have a little sacrifice to pay a little more for these goods so that we can encourage the manufacturing at home, get some of these factories back on American soil. And it's a doable thing. And I think the good Lord has given us this opportunity and we need to support the president in May. Take a few months, maybe a year for it to work through the entire system. When Milley took over in Argentina and they were in, he was in debt to the globalists, right? Argentina was. And he cancels all that debt. And for a while it was a little bit of an upheaval. But now Argentina is on solid footing and countries are like investing in Argentina because they say, hey, wait a second, this, he's got his act together, they're on financial solid ground.

Charlie Kirk (35:38)

Final thought here, Bill, and then we gotta run is how would you. In a quick five to ten minute way. Let's just keep it to five. If you can say that. How Christians should think about government. Where in the Bible does it say that we should have separation of powers, consent to the governed? Why is it that western government is grown out of biblical principles? Make the case.

Bill Federer (35:59)

Yeah. So the default setting for human government is gangs. And a gang leader with enough weapons we call a king. And the first recorded instance of this was Nimrod Tower of Babel. And Josephus, the Jewish commentator, said Nimrod wanted to build a tower so high that if God destroyed the world again with a flood, he could survive on top. And he made everybody in town bake bricks and bring them or he would kill them. And since the population of the world was centered there in Mesopotamia and he wanted to control it, in a sense, Nimrod was the first globalist. And God comes down, confuses the languages. The people scatter into language groups that turn into nations. Lo and behold, nations was God's invention to postpone a one world government. But every generation has some king. Pharaoh Caesar, Kaiser Sultans are that wants to conquer other nations. And if left unchecked, they'd have been happy to conquer them all. And they keep getting bigger and bigger. With the latest military advancements, the kings can kill more people. So instead of Cain killing Abel with a rock, they can kill with a bronze weapon, an iron weapon, a phalanx spear. The Greeks had scimitar sword that the Muslims had. And with the latest technological advancements, the kings can track more people. Augustus Caesar wanted a worldwide tracking system 2 BC called the Census. If he could add access to 5G and cell phones and facial recognition Software. I bet he'd been tempted to use that. So these kingdoms keep getting bigger until the king of England had the biggest. The sun never set on the British Empire. He was a globalist. He was a one world government guy. India, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, British Guyana, Canada, Barbados, Bermuda, Jamaica and America. So America's founders broke away and flipped it and made the people the king. And so the word citizen is Greek. It means co king. So kings have subjects who are subjected to their will, republics have citizens and the citizen is a co king. And where did the founders get this idea? It's a polarity change. America is an experiment of a polarity change in the flow of power. Instead of top down rule by gang leader kings, it's bottom up ruled by we the people that we got the idea from the New England pastors. That in Connecticut, in New Hampshire, in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Where did they get their ideas from the Bible. What part of the Bible that first 400 years out of Egypt before they got a king. So king is the norm. The pharaoh was one of the most powerful. And around 1400 BC millions of Israelites come out of Egypt and for four centuries no king. And it worked because every citizen was taught the law and personally accountable to God to follow it. And it worked for four centuries until the priests went woke and stopped teaching that there was sin. And Eli the high priest, his own sons are sleeping with women in the tent of meeting. And another Levite with a silver graven image and another Levite with a concubine where the law says the Levites to marry a virgin of his own tribe. And the poor concubines raped to death by a bunch of sodomites. Something about that behavior that appears at the last stages of a people around themselves and it turns into chaos. They all go to Samuel the prophet and they say this self government system is not working anymore. We want to be like the other countries, we want a king. And Samuel cries and the Lord tells Samuel, they did not reject you, they rejected me. Now why is this story important? Kings of Europe look to the Bible for their authority. But they look to the king Saul. And on part of the Bible divine right of kings, the royal gang leader and the pilgrims and Puritans that founded New England looked to the pre king Saul part of the Bible. Millions of people, everybody taught the law personally accountable to God to follow it. So King Saul's the divider between England and America. And so the idea of people being involved in government goes back to the pre king Saul part of the Bible. And so in New England, you literally had churches founding cities. So the First Baptist Church in America founded Providence, Rhode Island. The First Congregationalist church in America founded Hartford, Connecticut. Everybody's involved in church, everybody's involved in city government because it's the church founding the city. There's like no non church members there to be lazy and let them run stuff, right? And they had one building in town called the Meeting House. That's where the pastor would teach the Bible and that's where they do their city business. The word synagogue means meeting House. That's where the rabbi would teach the law. That's where they do their city business. And so this was a covenant form of government where you get rights from God. You're fair to your neighbor because you're accountable to God. You get blessings from God and you voluntarily share them with your neighbor as charity because you're doing it as unto God. It's not socialism where the government takes away your stuff without your permission and gives it to somebody you'll never meet. And they don't care where the money came from. No, this is your money and you're moved upon by the Holy Spirit to be generous. And this system worked for a century until it got a little dry. And the Pilgrims and Puritans taught it academically at Yale and Harvard. And so they got nicknamed Old Lights. And so David Brainer was expelled from Yale because he said his professor was as spiritual as a chair. And so in the 1700s you have the New Lights and these are people that said, look, it's more than a plan. Even if it's a good plan, you have to have an experience with Jesus. When you do, your life will change. You won't do worldly things anymore. More like bars and brothels and government. It's like, wait, what was that last thing? Yeah, government, it's worldly. If you're really Christian, you're not going to be involved in worldly things like government. It's like, huh, that's sort of different than an entire century where Christians are involved in government because it's Christian founder founding the city. They're like, yeah, we're not going to do that anymore. If you're really spiritual, you're going to withdraw. Well, that brings up an interesting scenario. Because if all the spiritual people withdraw from government, who's left to be involved? But the less spiritual, it's a self fulfilling prophecy. Don't get involved in government because it's worldly. Well, why is it worldly? We're not involved. All the Christians have Left and there's a vacuum, right? And so, you know, I thought people say, well, I'm spiritual. I'm not going to get involved in politics. By the way, politics comes from the word polish, which means city. And politics is simply the business of the city. And the policy is what the citizens all agree upon. And polite is how they're supposed to treat each other. And police is what happens when they don't treat each other polite. Right, but. But everybody's involved in the city. And so in New England, you had churches, founding cities, but when this revival happened, they're like, no, if you're really spiritual, don't be involved. So if people are, Christians are not involved. They're letting non godly people teach kids there's no God and there's no sin. Right? These little library books, try this kind of sex, try that kind of sex. If sex outside of marriage is not a sin, arguably there are no sins. And if there's no sins, you don't need a savior. They're undermining the entire gospel. You have to admit, it's a pretty clever trick the devil's pulled to get Christians who believe the gospel of Christ let their children be taught the gospel of Antichrist. Oh, really spiritual. We don't want to get involved in politics. We're going to let our kids be taught there's no God, there's no sin, there's no need for a savior. It's like, oh, you're really spiritual, aren't you, Bill?

Charlie Kirk (42:57)

We'll leave it there. We'll have you back soon. We're out of time. Please plug every all your work so our audience can follow you.

Bill Federer (43:03)

Thanks. Americanminute.com is my website, Americanminute.com I have a book called Silence Equals Consent, the Sin of Omission. We talk taxes. I did a book called the Interesting History of Income Tax. And also Turningpoint Academy. Yes, I do videos. And you can sign up at Turning Point Academy. Look for resources and it's an honor to be a part of of you with that as well, Charlie.

Charlie Kirk (43:26)

Very good, Bill. God bless you. Thank you for being a great friend. Hope to see you soon. Thanks so much. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us. As always, freedomarliekirk.com thank you so much for listening. God bless.

Bill Federer (43:42)

For more on many of these stories and news you can Trust, go to charliekirk.com.