B (7:04)

Yeah, many.

A (7:05)

They're really fun. I have never seen anyone at a Trump rally dress like this.

B (7:12)

Never.

A (7:14)

This guy, whomever this is, looks like he went all the way to the top level of the Capitol, that you could go alongside other people with flags. Seems to be celebrating or calling people up or something. I don't want to imply what he's doing at that moment. Does he look like he's going there to go fight for election integrity? Probably not. Again, I don't want to overly stereotype, but there's hundreds and hundreds of pictures of people like this that all of a sudden you're looking at a crowd of people that are wearing the typical MAGA hat or the typical MAGA beanie with their kind of Trump jacket. And then all of a sudden next to them you have a guy that dressed, that looks like he wants to be on Seal Team 6. And so more and more information is now coming to light that what happened on January 6 was not an act of randomness that would happen on January 6th was a pre plotted attempt for some of these guys, or whomever they are, to effect violence against our system of government. Look at the pipe bombs. You look at the amount the mace that was used against the police officers. So let's play tape here of Anderson Cooper interviewing John Sullivan, who has now been arrested. Again, people call him a left wing activist. I call him a pro chaos activist. I'm done with right versus left. He's a chaos activist. Play tape. John, you filmed this moment on your phone. Just. Can you describe what happened? Yeah. So basically all the protesters kind of stormed to get into the chamber. We tried to get into like the main entrance. Right. When you walk down the hallway. But that being said, nobody was able to get in because there's two guards refusing to move. So this clip, by the way, is really hard to find on any sort of clipping service like Grabian or otherwise. So we had to get someone filming their television that actually had it on dvr. It's really strange. We struggled to find it. I wonder why. So this guy was trying to get in front of it, saying he was a journalist covering it, when in reality there was tape that was coming out that he said, f, yeah, this is our country. This is our building. We're gonna take it back. I have not seen this video until recently where it seems as if this is from inside of the Capitol being taken by whom? It's called Uncensored tv. I just found it on social media of people that seem to be inside the Capitol. And this woman in the pink hat keeps on popping up in a lot of these kind of pick. Like when people are looking through pictures and group pictures, this woman in the pink hat seems to be sending out directions or seems to be kind of. And so what she does in this video, she walks, she goes through the window and with a bullhorn starts saying, and I'm going to paraphrase, if you want to take this building, there are weak defenses on this side. Go do that. And then you kind of hear the organizers, we need more people. We need more people. And so based on this, this is a trimmed version of the video, but based on this video, this video is super important because what for me is what it showed is that there were definitely organizers. Those organizers looked really out of place. One of the organizers in this video is wearing a gas mask as if he was trying to clean up Chernobyl. And I think he regretted being seen on camera because he was giving orders that the gas mask on. He realized he was on camera, and he puts the gas mask on, almost back on completely and quickly because I think he really regretted being identified. Now, whether, again, I'm not going to. People are saying these are right wing or left wing. It's irrelevant. You're inside the Capitol building trying to launch an attack on our country. You're chaos. Okay? You could call it whatever you want. Insurrectionist, terrorist. You kind of. You listen to this. But what the point is that there looks like there was a hierarchy in an organizer, and people that did not come to D.C. with this in mind that got caught up in it. Does that make them innocent? Absolutely not. And that's not the point. The point is that I think that these people that Wanted to plan something beforehand. Insurrectionists, whatever you want to call them, they all of a sudden got massive amounts of infantry support because of very angry people that were alongside of them. And so you had the instigators and the bad guys all of a sudden have extra bodies that they otherwise wouldn't have had. So let's play tape here, and I'll keep the mic on so I can narrate it. They're asking, what is the floor plan of Capitol? We need enough people. We need to push forward. Door right here.

B (12:19)

Okay. Hey, guys, I've been in the other room. Listen to me. In the other room, on the other side of this door right here, where these feet are standing, there is a glass that if somebody. If it's broken, you can drop down into a room underneath it.

A (12:37)

So this is a woman in the pink hat with a bullhorn giving orders to these other guys, some of which are draped in Trump flags, some of which are. Looked like they're wannabe military guys. And it just looks to be total chaos. Furniture up. She is giving direct advice to these people on how to take the building. And these insurrectionists are saying, we need more people. We need more people. This guy right here, look, he's gonna regret it in a second. He puts on his gas mask, and all of a sudden, oh, geez, I don't want to get filmed. Well, you already. Yeah, go put on your gas. Does that look like a guy you've seen at a Trump rally? No. With a gas mash gun like that. But then, as you can kind of see, it looks like there were other people that were. You can stop the tape. But as you could see in the tape, it looks like there were people that just looked like regular Trump supporters that were mixed in with that. And they obviously made a horrendous mistake. A lot of them have said that, and these arrests are just going to continue. And it does kind of reinforce a point that the FBI was making, which is that there's gonna be a lot more video and tape coming out that will be very, very alarming as it comes out, and hard to disagree with that after this last video. This last video shows a group of people that went into the Capitol that had. They were kind of having a huddle, if you will, through a. There was a window right there. And they were trying to contemplate the best way to, in their own words, take the building. They said that they had a floor plan, which infers that the leader studied the floor plan. Then, about halfway through the video, a woman in A pink hat who just keeps on popping up in a lot of different pictures. And I do not believe the woman in the pink hat has been arrested yet. But if you know any of these guys that are doing this or they recognize you, please, you know, be helpful in trying to. In trying to bring justice with this. When you have people that are saying, oh, I need to look at the floor plan. I need to look at, you know, the schematics of a building, really, of the United States Capitol building. And so then she screams through the window, whomever this person is, I don't care their political affiliation, with a bullhorn, she's screaming through the window. And I want to get it. I want to get it written down, because she was talking really quickly and it was really loud. But Isabelle, the essence of what she was saying was if you want to take the building, go here, not there, right?

B (15:27)

She was saying, I've been in the other room. Listen to me. I think. I hope we can get a transcript of that specifically. But essentially, this is the floor plan. This is what you need to know, and I can help you get in as deep to the Capitol as possible,

A (15:39)

which is chilling that there's this woman. Was that just so we're clear, that kind of pushes back against one narrative, and it does reinforce a different narrative that some Democrats and some Republicans are pushing. So one narrative that that pushes back is that this was just an out of control, you know, just expulsion of anger. People just ran in and they came in and they couldn't control themselves, and then they got it out of their system. This advances a different narrative. Again, we're putting all these pieces of evidence together to try to find out what really happened here. This piece of narrative, if you have a woman with a bullhorn that's going through a window and someone who's receiving that guy with a gas mask that looks like he's trying to navigate Chernobyl or Nagasaki, if you have that, then that goes to show that that person was just not there because they got drummed up at a rally because of something President Trump said. That woman in the pink hat, the guy that was saying. And then the other part of the video, which is interesting as we get it back up, is they were saying, we need more people. We need more people, as if we need more personnel. And so at that point, some of the people that got worked up at the rally might have participated in that, but it seems as if there was somebody or a group of somebodies that were there that had a plan in mind, right?

B (17:04)

Charlie. And that fits into the CNN article we were talking about yesterday as well a bit. A really important piece of the investigative reporting that's coming out after the fact of this event happening is the reality that the FBI has reported it's received more than 126,000 tips by Wednesday morning of last week. So that was well before the attack happened, well before the President's speech. That's not to say people didn't get caught up in the moment, have a heat of the moment, passionate response.

A (17:34)

Yeah. Is that people then? Some people, not everyone. Remember there were hundreds of thousands of people that didn't get near the Capitol that went to the permitted free speech, election integrity speech at the Ellipse. There are tens of thousands of people, we don't know how many, let's say 15,000 that then went to the Capitol. And then there are people that saw it and then they got involved that point. You're still criminally liable.

B (17:59)

Absolutely.

A (17:59)

However, it seems that according to all available reports that there was a hierarchy, there was somebody that was planning this that was trying to penetrate the United States Capitol. We have to find out who those people are.

B (18:13)

We do. And hold them accountable because that behavior is absolutely not okay.

A (18:17)

We've been terrorist.

B (18:18)

Terroristic.

A (18:18)

I don't know how else to think about that outside of the. And I think the other part of this where these, you know, these folks that did this, I mean, I don't want to try to. I don't want to try to imply their motives because I don't know what their motives would be. But I think that they used a political kind of facade as an opportunity to accomplish some of their very, very evil goals and objectives.

B (18:44)

Right. Last Wednesday was a passionate day for many, many Americans in our country. We are experiencing extreme political divides right now. And when you can capitalize on a moment like that to take advantage of people's emotions to accomplish some goal. And again, we don't necessarily know what the motive behind the actions of last Wednesday was. It's a pretty easy way to make a big splash when it comes to making as much damage happen as possible.

A (19:08)

That's right. And so that video, amongst others, and so we're kind of piecing all these videos together. And the best way I can describe everything that we have been presented is it's chaos. And so it's not right wing fundamentalism, it's not left wing fundamentalism. It looks chaotic. So here is the transcript of what we were looking at. Can we play that video on mute? Is that possible? Bear with me I'll do the best job I can. NARRATING so let's play this video on mute. There we go. Okay, so this is, this looks to be a group of insurrectionist rioters, whatever you want to call it, these guys that are wearing these sophisticated gas masks, I've never seen one of those at a Trump rally. And I'd be very interested to see how many people with sophisticated gas masks were at the Ellipse. Probably very little. Now, people like that, she looks like more like a conventional Trump supporter caught wrong place, wrong time, making a bad, stupid decision. And I think that there's just a mixture, it's just a chaotic mess of all of this. However, at this point of the video, as you can see on the live stream, this woman, this pink haired Pat woman starts saying, hey, guys, I've been in the other room. Listen to me. In the other room, on the other side of this door, right where we are, these people are standing, there's glass that if it's broken, you can drop down into a room underneath it. There's also two doors in the other room. There's also one in the rear and one in the right where you go in. So we should probably coordinate together if we're going to take this building we're in, we got another window to break, guys, to make getting in out easy. And this window here needs to be broken. And then these guys start to say, we need more people, we need more people. They start to grab furniture and in a processional line start to go into the other room. So this woman with the, by the way, if you know this pink hat woman, please tell the authorities immediately. And this other guy here looks to be a leader. So whomever this journalist is or whomever filmed this, this is invaluable. This guy right here, he is saying, we need more people, Help us, help us, help us. And then all of a sudden he puts on his gas mask in kind of like a last minute. Oh, my goodness. Why are you filming me? Yeah, okay, now you look like a Chernobyl like type. They go into this looks, look like a congressional office here. This is, this violates like every law. Like it's not a matter of, it's not a matter of like some laws. This violates every law. I'm being facetious, of course. And then they are raiding this bill, they're raiding this office. Looks like they're taking devices that this guy right here in all black. And it looks like a mixture, right? Mixture of people that are wearing MAGA hats that look more Conventional. And people that do not look conventional at all, it looks like just to be a complete and total mess, Chaos. And so, but. And then they go to this and they're breaking that window. And then the video continues and they break that window as per the directions of that woman. Right.

B (21:58)

She had some very clear intelligence on how to take as much ground as possible in the Capitol building.

A (22:03)

And so that woman in the pink hat, again, we're getting a lot of emails@freedomarliekirk.com they say she looks like a liberal. And it's completely irrelevant. I don't care. Okay, okay. The John Sullivan guy, Sullivan guy, he looks like an instigator. He's a BLM guy. Fine. It's either you're on the side of chaos or you do the side of order. Okay. The political side of this I think is overdone. I really do. And I also. You don't know who's representing what. They're wearing a MAGA hat. The John Sullivan guy's wearing a MAGA hat. It's exhausting. So it's. You're either on the side of the, of decent civil conversation or you're not going to be. And so we have some breaking news out of D.C. is that right?

B (22:46)

Our team is sending us some information that's been found on Twitter. As we know, D.C. looks a lot like a war zone right now.

A (22:54)

You can see, I think there are more troops in D.C. than there are in Afghanistan.

B (22:57)

There are, I've been told, confirmation of that. It's insane to say the least, but we're hearing that there's only going to be two so called First First Amendment zones in the entirety of Washington D.C. near Pennsylvania Avenue this week. Only up to 100 people will be allowed inside each space. Anyone must go through metal detectors to get in and they'll be escorted into the free speech or first amendment zone. The National Park Service just announced this during a press conference.

A (23:24)

Look, it's hard to disagree with their line of thinking with some of this, but yeah, I mean, I think that the entire area, I mean, is on complete lockdown, especially with what we saw. And while I am a free speech absolutist, that does. That seems a little bit over the top. But I think that all of us can agree that, you know, this is something happened here at the Capitol that was not just a spontaneous outrage of political results. And more and more evidence is coming to light to show that. And so that pink hat woman, if we can find out who that pink hat woman is, I think all Of a sudden, she's one of the kingpins.

B (24:03)

Do your work, Internet.

A (24:04)

Yeah.

B (24:04)

Help us find her.

A (24:05)

Find the pink hat woman. In other news, the shaman is not a good guy. And let's see here. The shaman has come out and it says, quote, in a new court filing, strong evidence shows that the shaman intended to, quote, capture and assassinated elected officials. Now, that evidence has not been made public yet in the court filing, but for a prosecutor to say that and not back it up is very rare. The motion was filed in federal court in Phoenix. Says that Chansley should be detained because he wants to return to Washington for the inauguration. Geez, bad idea. It says, here's a. Here's what the shaman believes. Chance Lee has openly spoken about his belief that he is an alien, a higher being, and he is here on Earth to ascent to another reality. I'm reading from NBC News. The document says, quote, I am able to perceive multiple different frequencies of light beyond my five senses and allows me to see into these other dimensions. He's gonna be very popular in prison. The fact that we had a bunch. This is what he said. He was praising and applauding what happened last week. He said, quote, the fact that we had a bunch of traitors in offices hunkered down and made them put on their gas masks and retreat to their underground bunker, I consider that a win. And so we'll see what happens there. But it's according to them, this is their strong evidence intended to capture and assassinate election officials. So that is. That is a. That's a story in progress.

B (25:39)

Hopefully we'll hear more here within the next few days. Obviously, as more information becomes available with these court filings, the people will be able to access more of this information.

A (25:48)

So let's go to cut 117. Shannon Bream, who is reporting on the arrest of John Sullivan. Cut 117.

B (25:57)

As investigators try to piece together exactly what happened last week. A left wing social justice activist allegedly posing as a journalist was just arrested by the FBI in Utah. The FBI affidavit says he's on video egging on protesters at the Capitol. He said things like, we're about to burn this down and we ain't waiting until the next election.

A (26:18)

Geez. Professional agitation is what it is, and we'll see if there's more of that. It seems that the initial arrests were people that would more identify as Trump supporters, like the Electern thief, the shaman, the zip tie guy, and the guy that was wearing the helmet that looks like it was from mash. Those look like the, those were the more very eclectic group of people, by the way, that tried to storm our government. The shaman guy, the lectern guy, the zip tie guy. And now we have the BLM guy. That's what they'll always be known as. And I just want to say this. There was a US Gold medal Olympic winner that was arrested. What were you thinking, man? What, you won a gold medal for our country and you wear the Olympic jacket into the Capitol building and start to fight police officers or at least push back against them again? He's allowed representation, counsel. There you go. He's allowed counsel and cross examination of witnesses and the presumption of innocence. I've seen the video. I don't know what these guys were thinking.

B (27:34)

I have no idea.

A (27:35)

I don't know what these guys were thinking when they're going in there and they started to see that this was just unfolding and up to no good. It's just not, not, not good. Not smart. Let's go right here. Let's say here this question, Charlie, do you think what kind of gun control legislation do you expect to get passed in the next two to four years? Dramatic gun control. They're going to try to register guns, they're going to try to limit what they call assault rifles, which is a completely and totally made up term. So you can expect dramatic gun control legislation happening in the short term, in the near term here, especially through executive actions. And so that's going to be happening very, very soon, unfortunately. Email us your questions, freedomcharliekirk.com what's going on with Operation Warp Speed?

B (28:26)

We're hearing just now that the Biden administration plans to retire Operation Warp Speed, which we know was the very effective program put into place by the Trump administration to roll out several effective vaccines against COVID 19 in record time. Just to put some things into perspective for you guys, I studied healthcare policy for my master's degree at Georgetown. And on average, it takes 10 to 15 years and around $500 million to develop a new vaccine, period, any vaccine for anything in the United States. So the fact that we got several vaccines in a very short period of time speaks to the leadership of this administration. But it seems that the Operation Warp Speed program will be retired from the Biden administration.

A (29:07)

It's too bad. I mean, the President has did an unbelievable job responding to the Chinese coronavirus. And I think that the biggest, I think that the biggest concern that I have is whether or not, and I don't think it will happen at all. Joe Biden is Gonna hold China accountable for the epidemiological Pearl harbor that they launch on our country. So really, really tragic. Let's get to some sound here. This is John Sullivan. This last summer play tape formed against our group. We out there strapped. We out there ready to burn that shit down. We out there to defend ourselves. We got Rip Trump out of that office right over there. Pull him out that. Nah, nah. We ain't about waiting until the next election. We about to go get that mother. I ain't about that because you know what time it is. I want y' all to be after me. It's time for revolution. It's time for revolution. So it's tempting to call him a left wing activist. That might be true. He just seems like a burn it down activist. Just someone that delights in the chaos and the anarchy and the discord. That is someone that seemed to have a lot of friends that were waiting there outside of the Capitol. So this Pink Hat woman, and we don't know who it is. Again, if you know who the Pink hat woman is, who. I think she was wearing Gucci sunglasses or something. It was very pretty.

B (30:29)

Designer.

A (30:30)

Designer sunglasses. That was not something that you just pick up at the local cvs, let me tell you. She said, where is the tape? We had this written down here, didn't we? We transcribed it. Okay, here. Yeah. So she leaned into the window and she said this. The following. Hey, guys, I've been the other. Been in the other room. Listen to me. In the other room, on the other side of this door right here where these people are standing, there's glass that if it's broken, you can drop down into a room underneath it. This is an invasion. Okay. There's also two doors in the other room. There's one in the rear and one in the right where you go in. So we should probably coordinate together if we're going to take this building.

B (31:09)

Whoa.

A (31:11)

We're in. But we got to find another way to break the window to make getting in and out easy. And this window here needs to be broken. Pink Cat woman. Now we are loading up the clip here where she decides to go full Braveheart and get a battering ram, literally a battering ram up against the window. There's other video that shows Pink Catwoman running around, just running errands or something around the Capitol, just kind of calling shots. And so we kind of have a still image that will pull up here. And we're also gonna play the. Play the tape here of Pink Hat woman who seems to be kind of Calling the shots. I'm looking at this picture of pink hat. Is that a fur coat?

B (31:55)

I mean, she looks pretty well dressed.

A (31:56)

Not a fur coat. I'm sorry, It's a fur hood at least.

B (31:59)

Yeah, a fur lined hood on her coat, it appears. Hopefully we can get this picture for you guys on the road.

A (32:04)

The best dressed insurrectionist I've ever seen.

B (32:06)

She's ready. She looks great. She's ready to be filmed during the insurrection. So she's definitely an organizer of what's going on here. And you know, we saw that obviously with her bullhorn that she was screaming, commands other people through.

A (32:20)

So strange.

B (32:21)

But there's definitely something bigger going on here than just spur of the moment. Hey, everybody, let's make a decision to go inside.

A (32:28)

Yeah, this is, this is more than just people's tempers boiled over. This is. And all of this, by the way, completely undermines the predominant Democrat narrative, which therefore undermines impeachment, which therefore undermines the Constitution. This was a drive through impeachment and a hit and run attack on our Constitution. And additionally, there is a Democrat narrative that has been forming that actually ends up to be more true, but against why they impeach the president. So I want you to. I'm gonna play this tape here, please. No sound. In case anyone says some bad words. Let's play the tape here. I'm going to narrate it for people on the window. Play tape. So this is Pink Catwoman. Want to narrate it, Isabel?

B (33:12)

Sure. So we're seeing her start to organize a little crowd around her saying, everybody grab this giant pole and let's slam through the window. She's repeatedly hitting the window with this giant pole and they're breaking through into the U.S. capitol building. Other people are standing around in the crowd looking around like, what's going on here? Am I supposed to be a part of this?

A (33:32)

So yeah, let's play this tape again. Here's a life lesson for everyone watching. When you're at right near a US Capitol building and a battering ram gets introduced, don't just sit and watch her do it. Leave, like quickly. Okay, so for these guys that are just watching as if they're watching, you know, their seven year old play soccer, unfortunately, you're probably gonna get arrested. I'm not saying unfortunately for the law, unfortunately for you. And you're going to say, I did nothing wrong. Well, okay, you're right on film, right next to a woman that's trying to penetrate the U.S. capitol building. Okay. However, this pink hat woman was Was shouting instructions into the window, and she has what looks. Looks like a battering ram.

B (34:13)

That's what it appears to be.

A (34:14)

This looks like 13th century Scotland, that they're trying to retake Wessex or something. So let's play the tape again. And it looks like there's simultaneously a lot of different things happening right now. Now, where this is on the Capitol kind of schematic, I don't know. Right behind her is a guy dressed in all black. Do you see that? And then there's that guy kind of dressed in the yellow. The guy dressed in the yellow looks like someone who just strolled by. Wrong place, wrong time. Again, we're just judging here, right? The guy in the black right behind her looks like a co conspirator. If you notice, there's a guy right behind her with a fraudulent helmet that says U.S. capitol Police. Do you see that?

B (34:51)

Mm.

A (34:52)

Someone disguising themselves as US Capitol Police. Now, maybe that is a US Capitol Police officer. Unlikely that a US Capitol Police officer would allow a battering ram to go. I know. I'm just saying it's. I'm just. One of my team members said it's not. It's not. It could be a stolen helmet. Likely is.

B (35:12)

It's unlikely someone would just stand there and watch that.

A (35:14)

So for that guy that just kind of turned to his friend with the CNN sucks hat again, when you're near trouble, get out. Okay. It's just a good life lesson. Okay, so let's continue to play tape here. Why is that guy. Pause it. You see how big of a backpack that guy has? I mean, that. Look at all the other people around. What's in that guy with the red pack with the red backpack? One of the guy that's trying to go really slow. Why would you have a red backpack like that?

B (35:44)

That.

A (35:45)

That's. That's a massive, massive. Now again, that does. That's not a. Maybe he's studying. Maybe he's on his way to get his master's. I don't know. I mean, everyone's innocent until proven guilty. When you show up to something like this with what looks like at least 30 pounds of weight in your backpack, you're probably not walking around with books on the Hegelian dialectic. It's probably something a little bit more sinister than that. Okay. If you see the guys that are walking around like they're going skiing in Deer Valley or that they're about to go skiing in Aspen, that is not how people dress to rallies, you could all of a sudden start to see the differences between people that got caught up in something, and if they broke the law, then they should be arrested. Let me be clear. Getting caught up in something is not a defense against, oh, I got caught up. It's tough. Now, should you be given more mercy in the eye of the public, maybe? I mean, everyone has a different story here, and everyone should get a. A lawyer and an attorney and be able to, you know, go through it. This woman in the pink hat, she is. She's a kingpin.

B (36:48)

She is.

A (36:48)

Would you agree, Isabelle?

B (36:49)

Absolutely.

A (36:50)

Instigator, Kingpin, leader. Sorry, guys. Continue to play tape.

B (36:54)

So, Charlie, this appears to be the same window that we played tape on earlier when she's screaming through once it's broken. Or this may be the second window she asks people to break to make it easier to get in and out of the building.

A (37:06)

That seems right. If you know who Pink Catwoman is or any of her friends, please contact the authorities. To the best of my knowledge, Pink Cat woman has not been arrested. Is that correct?

B (37:17)

I haven't heard anything about her arrest, so that would be news to me today.

A (37:20)

Yeah. And one of our team members brought up a great point that bags that big as the red bag, they're usually not even allowed at rallies. If you know this woman or if you know, you know, someone that went to the rally that dressed like this, this woman did more than just. She's at one of the top levels of someone that has not yet been arrested with the most amount of evidence publicly available that goes to show that she was trying to plot something sinister against our government. Would you agree?

B (37:48)

Absolutely. That's a great analysis of the situation.

A (37:50)

And so I think it's critical that we find this woman. And I think our law enforcement agencies will. Whomever this person is. So people that came prepared with gas masks like that, it's not gonna work. Well, in your defense. Just gonna be honest with you now, what's gonna end up happening, and what should happen is that people around her are gonna get arrested and she will be found. I pray the quest to find Pink Hat Woman continues. Pink Hat lady, we're gonna unto you. Someone just asked a question here. Hey, Charlie, wasn't there a pink hat rally right after Trump was elected? Yes, but I don't think that that is the same hat.

B (38:30)

Different pink hats, actually. But.

A (38:33)

But if you want to stand out at anything that has anything to do with Trump, anything, wear a pink hat. So let's play this tape again. Again, we've been zeroing in on the Pink Cat Woman. This program. Cuz I think that she actually is one of the keys to finding out exactly what happened here. Regardless of her politics, Regardless of politics in general, it is so critical that we find out what happened here. So we found this video online of pink Catwoman getting some form of a battering ram. Is that right?

B (39:08)

It appears to me to be a battering ram. You said she went full Braveheart and I loved that analogy, Charlie.

A (39:14)

Full Braveheart trying to take the fort at Wessex. What do I see that doesn't really fit? Well, first of all, the gentleman next to the pink hat woman who's helping with the battering ram. What do you see there, Isabelle?

B (39:27)

A giant red backpack.

A (39:30)

What does that probably mean?

B (39:31)

It tells me that he probably did not come from the president's speech. Charlie, you and I have been to the White House many, many times. We've had events with the President and anyone else requiring Secret Service many, many times. And clue number one about you probably weren't at the event with Secret Service security is a giant backpack. Typically, you're not even allowed to bring any bags into an event, especially not while featuring the President.

A (39:53)

Not even close.

B (39:54)

Right.

A (39:55)

So that goes to show that this gentleman or woman, I don't want to assume their gender.

B (40:00)

The person very woke of you, Charlie.

A (40:01)

I appreciate that. I think we're gonna have to ask for the rioters pronouns.

B (40:05)

Yeah, we'll have to know before we move forward.

A (40:08)

So this person with the red backpack almost assuredly did not attend the president's speech.

B (40:16)

Right.

A (40:17)

What I see also is about half of this crowd that is distracted because something else is happening on the other side of the crowd. I also see that this, the man behind the pink hat woman, the guy that's dressed in all black with goggles on, that does not look like a conventional Trump supporter to me. He did not go above and beyond to try to disguise himself.

B (40:37)

Right. And it also just doesn't make sense attire choice wise for a rally or for attending a speech. It looks a lot more like this man is suiting up to go skiing in the mountains.

A (40:47)

So it looks like what was happening is that there was another crew bashing in windows behind the pink hat woman. But the pink hat woman was given responsibility over this point of entry.

B (40:58)

Right. And we played another tape earlier in the show, Charlie, where she once they break this window, or maybe it's through a separate window right above it. She's using a bullhorn to tell people directions and the layout of the floor plan inside the Capitol building as well.

A (41:11)

And so what I also see Here, though, is people that are bystanders. Now, mind you, I'm not saying innocent bystanders, okay? But they're bystanders and they're watching it happen. And we've talked about get out of dodge when this started. I mean, you shouldn't even be up there in the first place. Okay, but this guy wearing the Penguins hat probably looks like someone that is just confused law, right? I mean, not confused. I shouldn't say that. He's. He's. He's got. He's got himself involved in something I think he's gonna really regret. Do you think that's a fair way to put it?

B (41:42)

Yeah, he's in the wrong place at the wrong time.

A (41:44)

And that's. There's. Look, as I was saying with our team earlier, as we've gone through hours of this footage, it looks like there's tranches of people involved here, right? It looks like there's just. It's a mess. There's no other way to put it. Which is why this is going to take time. Which is also why we want to use our platform to help find these people. Right. We're reaching millions of people. And I want to help find Pink Hat Woman, whomever Pink Hat Woman actually is. So this, this Pink Hat Woman, we've already read her remarks twice. I think she's talked about a schematic takeover. Take the building. Different parts of entry. Prosecutor is not gonna have. I'm gonna. I'm not a prosecutor. You're not a prosecutor. Just based on things that are being said. If there's anyone that I have seen that looks verbally and through action that actually can be tried for sedition or for terror, it looks like Pink Catwoman is near the top of that list Again, in my complete, you know, JV analysis of this. Not to say that other people haven't, but she's the one that said we need to take the building. I've already been in the other port of entry, and she was physically involved in the battering of this window. So let's play tape of her. Here she is, she says, I'm going to need some help. No one really decides to help her. And she's like, come on, man, let's go. Let's do this thing then. Red backpack. Jeez, they are really going after that window.

B (43:02)

Hard as they can.

A (43:03)

Guy stole a Capitol Police gear. What's going on at Harvard?

B (43:08)

Well, always crazy things happening at Harvard is the answer to that, Charlie. But as of this week, there is a new petition being circulated by four Current students called revoke their degrees in an attempt to try to revoke any Harvard diploma from someone who's an outspoken supporter of the president, who worked for his administration, or who objected to the Electoral College results last week on Capitol Hill. That includes Kayleigh McEnany, Senator Ted Cruz, and Representative Dan Crenshaw, among many others. It's actually gaining a lot of support among current students and former students as well. And they're citing a previous incidence in which Harvard decided to revoke a degree in 2010 from a Russian spy as why we should revoke degrees from Trump supporters. I think this sets a really interesting precedent for elite schools, and I'm curious to see if other east coast elite schools.

A (43:55)

Well, let's see if they. Let's see if they follow through on it, Right?

B (43:58)

Well, yeah, we'll see if that ends up happening, but I anticipate some more petitions being circulated.

A (44:02)

I'm sure the University of Pennsylvania, another Ivy League school, is going to try to revoke Trump's degree. Don Jr. Went to Pennsylvania and Eric went to

B (44:11)

Georgetown, and Tiffany just graduated from Georgetown Law as well.

A (44:14)

I think they're going to try to revoke them all.

B (44:15)

Yep, we'll see. We will see.

A (44:17)

Let's get to some new tape here of Jack Dorsey, Project Veritas. They just swing for the fences and they hit a home run every time. It's pretty amazing. James o', Keefe, let's play tape here of Jack Dorsey saying that the purge is just beginning. Play tape. You know, we, we are focused on one account right now, but this is going to be much bigger than just one account. And it's going to go on for much longer than just this day, this week, the next few weeks. It's going to go on beyond the inauguration. We have to expect that. We have to be ready for that. So the focus is certainly on this account and how it ties to real world violence, but also we need to think much longer term around how these dynamics play out over time. I don't believe this is going away anytime soon. He doesn't believe the censorship is going away anytime soon.

B (45:12)

Shocking.

A (45:14)

And that is Jack Dorsey. I don't know how James o' Keefe got his hands on that. It looks like a FaceTime call.

B (45:19)

It does. I think he said later on in this video, he ends up explaining a little bit more of the context. And an employee from Twitter was the one who recorded this and sent it over to Project Veritas. Very, very incredible footage. Interestingly, too, when it comes to tech censorship, we've talked a little bit about this in the last few days, but world leaders are speaking up en masse to say that this is a horrible precedent to set banning the President of the United States. And now the President of Mexico has joined the rallying call. President Lopez Obrador says that he's going to bring up some sort of proposal in the first G20 meeting about tech censorship and how it's impacting the global society that we're living in today.

A (45:57)

Incredible. And you want to give more and more power to these tech companies. Just keep on doing what you've been doing. And that is. That's different than what Jack Dorsey has said publicly. Publicly, he said, oh, it's just one account, you know, nothing more. Jack is now talking about a much broader indictment of any sort of accounts that they just disagree with.

B (46:21)

Yeah. And he's saying it's really just beginning. This is going to drag on for many weeks after Inauguration Day, he's saying in this tape. So I think we can anticipate it's pretty safe to assume that conservatives are going to be under attack online for a long time.

A (46:32)

Well, and a lot of these leaders that are running countries that are not even as stable as the United States, they're really worried that Twitter's going to come in and destroy their capacity to communicate with their audience. And there's going to be a lot of counter moves against Twitter that could very well destroy the company if they are not careful. India, for example, could create their own Twitter and just mandate it that American Twitter is not allowed. We're gonna create our own. And it's downloaded in every single phone that's purchased in India. Stuff like that is not off the table. I spoke about that with Wilt Chamberlain on our podcast this last weekend. So I want to get to Tucker Carlson last night who basically said, the media has lied to us. Let's go to Tucker Carlson and play tape. But facts matter. All the facts matter. And we know now that contrary to what we were told and what CNN told us, this guy was not. We were lied to not just by the media, but by the government. And we should figure out why we were lied to. And if there are more people like John Sullivan in the Capitol. We don't know if there were. Let's find out. Why not? We don't know. And we don't know if Pink Cat Woman is like John Sullivan or if she's somehow some right identitarian extremist. Both are the laws apply equally, regardless of your political affiliation. The point is that we were told, I believe that we were told by either the FBI or the DOJ that there was no antifa involvement in this and that Tucker is pushing back against that narrative and saying, well, not so fast. It looks as if that there was a BLM incorporated activist that was involved in all of this. So as we kind of unpack this and the importance of this, some of you are emailing us very positively@freedomarliekirk.com trying to help us find out who Pink Cat Woman is. I want to be helpful trying to find Pink Cat Woman. It's going to be. I'm going to smile when Pink Catwoman is arrested because, again, I haven't seen all the evidence. You know, we're just. We're just a talk show here, and we're able to look at stuff publicly. But you have verbal commitments to take over the US Capitol. Schematic information. Her physically being involved, instructing other people. Something's not right there. And that is. That is domestic terror behavior. And so people are. You guys are asking, well, why does this matter? Why are you spending so much time on this? It matters a lot. First of all, I want to see people brought to justice. That's just a very simple thing. The second thing is that I don't think she's actually the most in charge person that was there. My guess is that Pink Hat Woman is part of a loose network of a couple dozen people that did not go to the rally. And her friend that was helping her with the sled, the whatever the heck that was, the battering ram, which I don't even know if it worked. That window seemed to have a lot of resilience.

B (49:11)

Yeah, it did. Although there was a video later on of her using a bullhorn through the broken window. So it was broken somehow. People, I think we would want this tape played as much as humanly possible to lead to any arrests, to give them more information on who's organizing this. And as you said, Charlie, we really are just speculating when it comes to what's happening here. But these are the questions that everyone should be asking. And it's alarming to me that more media outlets aren't doing that.

A (49:34)

And so everyone needs to do their job. And maybe you've run into Pink Catwoman before at a vegan juice bar or at a hot yoga class. Right, Ag, Something like that. And maybe you've run into her before, or maybe you ran into her at a gun store. I don't know. But the point is, if you know who Pink Catwoman is, then speak Up. Okay. So because it's really important because of all the people. Okay. The guy that stole the lectern, and he's smiling like a frat boy gone wrong. Yeah, he's a, you know, he broke the law and all that. I haven't seen any evidence that he was choreographing, calling shots, telling people to go to this room and carveen down here. This woman looks like a kingpin. And if you see something I'm missing, email us freedomarliekirk.com we want to be helpful here. I love this new era of citizen journalism. With millions of eyeballs on things, things can really be done quicker, more efficiently. Okay, Isabelle, what are we looking at?

B (50:24)

We're finding lots of tweets out there about our pink hat lady. That's her name for now, Charlie. And people are just wondering who she might be speculating based on other images from the event that day. I'm anxious to find out who she is and see what we can do to help lead to some information about the event. We're also pulling some footage for you guys from Twitter of this large militarized group. They're all wearing tactical gear, holding on to each other's backpacks in a single file line as they march up the steps of the Capitol to get closer to the front.

A (50:55)

We're going to put, we're going to pull that tape in just a second here as we kind of continue to analyze this and walk through this. That, that tape was just, it's just absolutely stunning.

B (51:06)

It's shocking.

A (51:07)

Yeah.

B (51:08)

And of course, we're not seeing that on most media sources. So I wonder, you know, what the whole story is here. And I'm hoping that people start asking all the right questions.

A (51:16)

That's right. Let's get to some sound here. In the meantime, let's go to cut 107. Let's go to Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist on Tucker says that the real reason that all Trump supporters, you'll be able to see it play tape monster, demonize him. He's a white supremacist. And from there, it's just a short step to call all his. The people who voted for him, the 75 million Americans and all their families, they are white supremacists as well. And the reason for that is because once you've called them the worst thing that you could, you then are able to dehumanize them and you can inflict any cruelty you like on them with impunity because they are now non persons. That's exactly Right. As soon as you begin to call people the worst thing you could possibly call them, all 74 million of them, then you, you, you. You give yourself almost moral license to be able to do whatever you want, however you want to do it. So I think we have the tape here to show where these people are wearing military and tactical gear, holding onto each other, walking towards the conflict. Is that right?

B (52:31)

That's what it appears to be to me. They're clearly marching up the steps of the Capitol building towards those front doors and windows.

A (52:39)

So as you can see, people, it looks like they're holding on to each other. And these are not National Guard members.

B (52:46)

Members.

A (52:46)

These are civilians, I guess, professional chaos instigators.

B (52:51)

And you got some people cheering in the crowd. Yes. Let's go. Let's go.

A (52:55)

And looks like they're marching up towards the top of the Capitol in real time, and they're calling other people to come up the same. Come on up. Come on up is what they're saying in tactical gear, holding on to each other as they climb up.

B (53:09)

And as we said earlier, Charlie, these aren't people that look like they came from a speech involving Secret Service security. You wouldn't have tactical gear on. You wouldn't have large backpacks. These people clearly were not at the President's speech.

A (53:23)

Email us your questions. Freedom Charlie Kirk.com Freedom Charlie Kirk.com Rudy Giuliani has tweeted out. What has he tweeted out?

B (53:30)

He says, I'm currently working with the FBI to expose and place total blame on over 226 members of antifa that instigated the Capitol riot.

A (53:41)

That is. That is Rudy Giuliani's latest tweet. So I'm surprised Rudy's still on Twitter.

B (53:46)

I am, too, to be honest with you. Actually, that's the first thing that popped into my mind, amazingly.

A (53:51)

That's. That's very interesting. Not sure how much longer Jack Dorsey is going to allow that to happen.

B (53:57)

Yeah.

A (53:58)

So we're going to take some of your questions here. Here's one. Hey, Charlie, what is the future of the Republican Party now? Basically, that's the essence of his question. Thanks so much, Bill. Well, look, the Republican Party is now going to be determined whether or not it's going to continue to be a grassroots party, whether it's going to be a party that embraces very popular ideas of renegotiating trade deals, of stricter immigration, of challenging entrenched corporate interests, or whether it's going to go back to be a Chamber of Commerce party. That Liz Cheney wants us to go towards Liz Cheney and people that are more in the establishment of the Republican Party. So that's why a lot of these debates and a lot of what we, you know, are talking about on this program is more important than ever before. Because I do not want to go back to a Republican Party that just is Democrat white. That is not what I want. I believe that the Republican Party needs to continue to be a party of working men and women across the country, a party that's trying to end the endless wars, and a party that's trying to give a voice to people that have quite honestly, been so severely disenfranchised for so many decades and so many years, which is exactly what the president did so well in his movement over the last couple years. And that's the direction I want the Republican Party to go to. Email us your questions freedomarliekirk.com Isabelle, what's on your mind?

B (55:22)

A lot's on my mind again, Charlie, as it has been all week. You know, I think we've been not surprised how much crazier things have gotten day to day. But it certainly is shocking just to see the state of affairs in our country today. And ultimately, I think what this boils down to is that the left is so intent on preaching unity that this is a time for all of us to come together to live in the United States of America. But simultaneously, they're blanketing all conservatives with this new label of domestic terrorist led by the new Osama bin Laden, in Eric Swalwell's words, that label being placed on President Trump, and then completely erasing your ability to exist in society. They're threatening to take your social media accounts away, to take your diplomas away from where you went to college if you're a Harvard grad. They're trying to remove Rudy Giuliani's ability to practice law in the state of New York from the New York Bar Association. They're trying to. The former mayor of New York City, who was mayor during 9 11.

A (56:17)

That's right.

B (56:18)

Yeah. So that's the reality.

A (56:19)

That's the Southern District of New York prosecutorial office. Yeah, that's. That's who they're trying to strip away. Let's go to cut 88 of AOC. Basically saying, you know, all that media stuff, social media, your ability to say stuff I don't like, that's the real problem. AOC basically pinpoints that media literacy is the true problem in our country. And we're going to have to figure that out to rein in the media environment in our country. Play cut 88.

B (56:43)

You know, I do think that several

A (56:45)

members of Congress, in some of my discussions, have brought up media literacy, because

B (56:53)

that is a part of what happened here.

A (56:57)

And

B (57:00)

we're going to have to figure out

A (57:04)

how we reign in our media

B (57:06)

environment so that you can't just spew disinformation and misinformation.

A (57:12)

So basically, if you have opinions that she does not like, she wants to loop you into misinformation and disinformation. Look, freedom of speech is. It's amazing that we have actually been able to keep freedom of speech for this long as a country. Freedom of speech is something that we have talked about many times here in this program. It is moral. But it's difficult. It's difficult because powerful people are constantly challenged when you allow freedom of speech, when you don't allow freedom of speech, like in North Korea or in China, and you challenge powerful people, you disappear. And so freedom of speech is the most important thing. Now, what AOC might consider disinformation, what AOC might consider misinformation, we consider ulterior viewpoints when all of a sudden they start to expand the guidelines this dramatically. And look, the answer to people being incorrect or the answer to people being wrong, like her, is more speech. I'm not advocating for a law. When we were in power, when we had the White House and the Senate and Congress to go censor socialist voices, that would be wrong. That would only empower them, actually. And it would also. It wouldn't be moral in any way, shape or form around it. Alexandria Casio Cortez is doing what most people with totalitarian impulses almost always do. Shut up the guy that challenges your power.

B (58:35)

And the rest of the world gets this, too. Charlie. We've seen international figures from around the world in the last few days point the finger at Big Tech in America and say that is a very dangerous precedent and should not be the culture we're accepting. We're hearing that from Australia, France, Germany, Russia, Poland, Mexico, just to name a few. And that number only continues growing by the minute. So it's amazing to me that we are the stand for free speech in the world, supposedly based on our Constitution and the way that we've governed our people for so long. But now it's the rest of the world telling us, you made a huge mistake. We're looking to you for leadership on this issue, and it's time to step up.

A (59:12)

That is so incredibly true. And if we do not have speech, which AOC wants to go after because she considers it to be disinformation, then we don't have a civilization. We put up with a lot of disinformation the last couple years. The entire Mueller, Russia hoax, entire thing was disinformation. We put up with it. We tried to win the argument, which I think we ended up winning because we had better ideas and we had truth on our side. Whereas they want to. They are indulging in very dangerous totalitarian impulses. Let me just tell you something, aoc, that you might feel like you run the Democrat Party, you might feel like you have all the cards, but when the corporate Democrats are in control, which they are, they're going to want to shut you up next. If they shut us up, which they basically have through Parler and through Amazon Web Services and all this stuff, and a lot of our voices have been severely muted. You think they're gonna continue to allow you to Gallivan talking about how entrenched corporate Democrats have to go. You try to think that you're not gonna be shut up or silenced, aoc, they want you shut up sometimes even more than us because you're an annoyance in their own caucus. And yeah, they use some of the energy and the enthusiasm of the Democrat socialist movement to try to get in power in certain parts of the country, but they consider you a threat. So be careful, aoc, trying to go after freedom of speech. Because the corporate Democrats, they are not ideological. They just want insider deals that allow their companies to get significantly richer. So keep that in mind, aoc, when you start to say that people should get silenced and shut up just because they hold viewpoints that you don't like. Let's go to some more tape here. I do want to go through here. A lot of you guys have been asking us, let's go to cut 74 of Glenn Beck. A lot of you have been emailing us freedomarliekirk.com about whether why corporations are not bound by the First Amendment. I think Glenn Beck does a pretty good job of explaining this. Let's go to cut 74. The corporation cannot curtail the liberty of press and religion of these people consistent with the purposes of the Constitution guarantees. And certainly the corporation can no more deprive people of freedom of press and religion than it can discriminate against commerce. Ownership does not always mean absolute dominion. The owners of privately held bridges, ferries, turnpikes and railroads may not operate them as freely as a farmer does on his own farm. That's the Supreme Court of the United States in 1946. There is, there's so much wisdom in what he said right there. So basically, if for, let's take a great example, let's say a very easy example for those of you from the Midwest, by the way, email us freedom. Charliekirk.com From Chicago, there's something called, I want to get the exact term for it. I think it's called the sky highway. It's called the. Has a very specific term. Anyway, it's Interstate 90. It's privately owned as it goes into Chicago from Indiana. And it's a private, it's private expressway for about 50 miles. I think it's called the Skyway. Yeah, the Chicago Skyway. That's right. And it's owned by a private group of investors and they have a toll and it's like $15, but it gets you through Chicago a lot easier. But despite it being privately owned, because they have so many people that depend on it as a thoroughfare, they can't all of a sudden put in a toll way and say, you know what? No Republicans are allowed to drive on our expressway. No people of hate are allowed to drive on our expressway. And what Glenn Beck, the point he's making, which is a terrific point, is that once you have the volume of the entire citizenry and the populace start to go through your enterprise, your highway, your ferry, your social media platform, then all of a sudden you become a choke point for the entire civilization. Whereas just a private farm in rural Indiana, if all of a sudden that private farm says, you know what, we're only going to allow people of faith to come onto our farm for our Bible study. You can't all of a sudden show up at that guy's farm and say, no, I want to have an American atheist meeting there. Okay? That's not the way it works. And so a lot of the private property arguments was always argued in for small businesses and medium businesses and also for even fairly large business, a couple thousand people. But once you have a platform, a highway, a ferry, an airline that has tens of millions of Americans going through it, all of a sudden you're no different than a public forum.

B (63:28)

Well, millions of people from around the world, too. That's important to remember is the rest of the world uses our social media sites to communicate as well.

A (63:35)

Totally. And so that is a very, very good point there. So continue to email us your questions. Freedom. Charliekirk.com we want to give away some signed copies of the MAGA doctrine, so make sure you guys are subscribed to the Charlie Kirk show podcast. You know, what to do? Subscribe, screenshot it, email it to us. Freedomarliekirk.com freedomarliekirk.com okay, let's get to some more questions here. Freedomarliekirk.Com Here's a good question, Charlie. With all the infighting, isn't America super vulnerable to attack from our more traditional enemies like Iran? Right now seems like a perfect time for someone to really disrupt our country. Or do they prefer to see us weakened, weakening ourselves from within? Mark? Yeah, I mean, look, if I was an enemy of the United States, if I was China, if I was Russia, what's happening in our country is their dream. They would love to see us tear each other apart from within. They delighted and mocked us when our capital was overrun. And they are, in more ways than one. They are looking at their ultimate power grab by not invading us, but dividing the United States of America from within.

B (64:41)

And that's why true unity is so important, too. The left has all these calls for unity right now, but as we've said earlier this week, it really just means get in line and behave according to our standards or else. But the United States is an anomaly to the rest of the world. We've been able to exist in harmony with people from dramatically different backgrounds for centuries. And it's that ability for us to coexist that way that's been an example for the rest of the world on how to behave. As soon as we get rid of that reality of our culture, that's when we appear weak to the rest of the world.

A (65:11)

I completely agree. And so here's an email here from Joel. And people listen to her. That's exactly right, Connor. People did listen to her, as if that they were familiar with what she was saying. She had authority. It seemed as if. Okay, here's an email here. Freedomarlicirk.com from Joel. This is a complete speculation. And so just know that. Hi, Charlie. I think law enforcement should start looking into Capitol staffers. Pink Cat has way too much knowledge. Her directions point to two different things. A, she has an intimate knowledge of the building layout, which would suggest inside help. B, based on the descriptive details she gave, it would take some very thorough studying of building blueprints to know that you could break a window and drop down into the other room. It's a really interesting point. Either way, it really starts connecting the dots that this was indeed premeditated. Thanks, Charlie. Keep up the good work, Joel. Thank you, Joel. We have no evidence besides what we've been analyzing, and it very well could be true. And so I think that they should absolutely get to the bottom of it through that way. Here is. Let's get to another email here. Freedom Charlie Kirk dot com. Someone thinks that that's a, that's a UPC pipe that they're using as the battering ram. That was a speculation from one of our listeners here. Let's go to one here asking about declassification. Okay. President Trump, based on all public reports, does plan to declassify a trove of documents. He does not have Twitter, so he won't be able to put them up. And I would not be surprised that Twitter comes out with policies. This is just a prediction that if Trump starts to declassify stuff, they're gonna start to ban accounts that then spread the declassified documents.

B (66:48)

Right. It'll be some sort of national security risk and that'll be, they'll say it

A (66:51)

was an illegitimate, impeached president that, you know. So that's just a prediction. I could just see this one ahead that all of a sudden Facebook and Twitter are gonna try to stunt some of these documents that are gonna be spread that are gonna be declassified very, very soon.

B (67:04)

So those are, sadly, that behavior is quite predictable now after this last week.

A (67:09)

That's right. So let's get to one more question here. Freedomarliekirk.com let's get here for Pink Cat. Can they use facial recognition? She had sunglasses on, which again, no one else was wearing sunglasses. She was obviously trying to hide her identity. And she was, there's closer up pictures of her, but she seemed to hide her face pretty well. I'm not sure the way facial recognition works, but she's the closest thing to a ringleader that I've seen. It looks here that she's without sunglasses and there she is with sunglasses. And you find Pink Cat woman, a lot of your questions are going to be answered. I'm telling you right now. The way that she knew the schematics, the way that she was conducting business, this is not just someone that got caught up in this. This is someone with inside knowledge that was communicating it to somebody else. That is not. That is something that needs to be investigated absolutely. Immediately. If you guys want to support our program, go to charliekirk.com charliekirk.com support somebody else says, hey, Charlie, in addition to Joel's statement, reading floor plans, especially for a building with a capital, is nearly impossible without going to architecture engineering school. I worked in architecture for 15 years and I could tell you the plans are not intuitive. I agree. My father's an architect. I could tell you they're not as easy to read as you might imagine. And so one of our listeners thinks that they have found another video of her. And so we'll look into that and we will investigate that. So anything you guys are hearing or seeing, freedomarliekirk.com, freedomarliekirk.Com thanks so much for listening, everybody. If you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, go to tpusa.com and if you want to support us, go to charliekirk.com support charliekirk.com support. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. God bless. Speak to you soon.