B (12:32)

Many have concerns about voting systems with remote access software. And I think we want to make sure that companies no longer sell voting machines that have network capabilities. We need also to understand supply chains. In December 2019, a study released by Interos, a supply chain monitoring company, showed that 1/5 or 20% of the components in a popular voting machine came from China based companies. Furthermore, close to 2/3 or actually 59% of suppliers within that machine's supply chain had locations in either China or Russia.

A (13:11)

For 2020, we have been working closely with jurisdictions seeking to upgrade their voting systems. Older end of life technology is being replaced with certified solutions that produce paper records for auditing and resilience. Is there any method of voting that's 100% secure? No, no, no. And first of all, I disagree with that. Of course there's a way that you could do it 100% secure. Of course there is. We just refuse to do it. It's called voter id, citizenship checks and it's no different than when you deposit a check at the bank. You have to verify who you are. There's a paper record of it and it uploads neatly and nicely into a secure system that is hardwired and has an entire fraud department. So they're just lying to you. And that is the Dominion voting system people that were being questioned by Democrats. And the kind of sweet irony of all this is that Democrats were questioning Dominion voting systems cuz they were worried about Russian interference in the election to help Donald Trump. And we already know Dominion voting systems changed 6,000 votes in Michigan, a 30% shift. Six thousand votes. And an independent analysis has kind of shown that if that shift was similar in other states using the Hammer and scorecard, which has been publicized by the great General McEnery, who has said that this was put in as a potential counterintelligence operation against our president, allegedly. And what's really happening here is that millions of people, tens of millions of people, believe that this entire election was a con job against President Trump. Now, regardless of your political affiliation, even if you're in the middle or if you're on the left, that is not a healthy outcome of any election. To be able to have the consensus of government, to be able to pass laws, to be able to not have a full fledged pseudo rebellion on your hands. And remember, in Texas, Dominion Voting Systems was turned down three times for certification in state elections. It listed numerous reasons why the system had major security issues. And now Dominion is linked to voting irregularities in Michigan and Georgia. Rashida Tlaib has come out and she says over the election debacle, I can't be silent in regards to centrist Democrats. We're not going to be successful if we're silencing districts like mine, said Michigan Representative Rashida Tlaib, who told her colleagues something similar during a contentious call last week. She said we're not going to be successful for silencing districts like mine. Me not being able to speak out on behalf of my neighbors right now, many of which are black neighbors, means I'm being silenced. I can't be silent. We're not interested in unity that asks people to sacrifice their freedom and their rights any longer. And if we truly want to unify our country, we have to really respect every single voice. We say it so willingly when we talk about Trump supporters. We don't say that so willingly about my black and brown neighbors and from my LGBTQ neighbors or marginalized people. Her argument is that Democrats became too centrist in this last election, that Democrats did not embrace their radical, insurrectionist, quasi BLM incorporated roots. Rashida Tlaib is part of the squad alongside Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley. I think the squad expanded their ranks, aoc said. It's not just like some moral question about how you confront racism in elections, but it is now an existential crisis for, like the Democrat Party, ocasio Cortez said. The problem, she said, is Democrats don't want to talk about race, is that really? Right. All you guys talk about is race. Aoc, it's literally your entire party platform. You talk about race more than the KKK ever did. Anti racism plays zero percent of a role in the Democratic electoral strategy. Zero. Implicitly, she continued. I'm not telling people the virtue signal, but, like, there's just no plan for it. No, she actually did say like six times in this interview. Ocasio Cortez, like, moderates, was not happy. By the way, I'm reading from Politico here. Zachary Warmbront. Ocasio Cortez says you don't have to bring in the Green New Deal into this. Why aren't we talking about creating 20 million new jobs, putting a solar panel on every roof? And we need to talk in images of sights and scenes. Sounds. Man, I hope that she continues to succeed politically. She's been a gift to Republicans. We're always messaging about bipartisanship and how much we love working with Republicans all the time in these sensitive areas. We need to have an unapologetic agenda and have an actual alternative in counter messaging that is distinct from the Republican Party. The Democrat civil war is on everybody. And as we try to get to the bottom of how this election was probably stolen from President Trump, the Democrats are wasting no time in the Bolshevik versus the Menshevik revolution. This is gonna be a bloody, long, drawn out Democrat struggle for power. And now that the Democrats have a assuredly decreased House majority, and they probably will not have a Senate majority, Mitch McConnell will. All of the Democrat energy will be focused on a power struggle between Rashida Tlaib, aoc, Ayanna Pressley and the Joe Biden technocratic wing of the Democrat party. The more that we can incite that metaphorical Democrat civil war, the better. The more that we can get them to actually believe they never talk about race. Okay? That will be a very effective agenda for Republicans if they keep on doing that. The New York Times has a new article out, of course. Course we predicted this. Trump's post election tactics put him an unsavory company. Not like they haven't called him a dictator before. Among the anti democratic tactics Mr. Trump has adopted are some commonly employed by leaders. They're comparing him to Mugabe Maduro of Venezuela and refusing to concede defeat and hurling unfounded accusations of electoral fraud. Unfounded accusations. The tactics also include undermining confidence in Democratic institutions, in the courts, and attacking the press and vilifying opponents. Really unfounded accusations. Like a 1,774% increase in voter registration for people that are 90 plus years old, 6,000 votes changed in Michigan. No answers on Dominion Voting Systems. I just want to, I want you to, for a thought exercise here, imagine Dominion Voting Systems was changing votes from Biden to Trump. If Dominion Voting Systems was changing votes from Biden to Trump, the New York Times would have, the shareholders would have, the CEO would have, every person who's ever invested in Dominion Voting Systems. We would have a complete and total picture of everything that has ever happened with Dominion Voting Systems. But since Dominion Voting Systems has benefited Democrats, arguably, and according to the President who just tweeted it, then they're perfectly fine with that. The New York Times, the Washington Post, they have convinced themselves President Donald Trump is such a threat to this country they are willing to do whatever is necessary to remove him. And that includes no longer being a journalistic media company. Instead it is a PR company for Democrat interests and left wing power grabs. The New York Times continued by saying in their article, it is rare for dictators to step down. When they do it, it's because like Pinochet, they have a feasible alternative, such as rejoining the military that allows them to avoid accountability for human rights abuses. The study by One Earth Future, a research group, said, I highly doubt that One Earth Future is actually a research group. I'd love to actually have that looked into. I could have wrote this article for them. In fact, I basically did. We predicted this on the program a couple days ago where I said, how long until they compare Donald Trump to Pinochet? I didn't think Mugabe. That's a new one considering Mugabe was a Soviet sponsored plant in the former crown jewel of Africa Rhodesia. But let me be very clear. There is nothing wrong, incorrect or unhealthy for President Donald Trump to look into and make sure our systems still work in how we elect leaders. And if we never challenge our systems, then they will be even more likely to be corrupt and taken over. One of my favorite parts of this article, this is a very important point, and this is helpful to all of you, is when people say Donald Trump is undermining our trust in democracy, they act as if democracy is one of Newtonian Newton's laws. For example. They act as if they say Donald Trump is undermining faith and gravity. Like, okay, no, we can see gravity. We can test it. Democracy only is what you say it is. First of all, we are a republic, not a democracy. But we do have democratic means of electing our leaders. But democracy only works when you have transparency. You have answers. You have People that are able to oversee the process. So you should be inherently skeptical of the process. That's actually really healthy. That skepticism will then birth involvement questioning and then you can answers to those questions, such as why was Benford's Law violated in Allegheny county and Milwaukee County? Now, some Democrat conspiracy theorists have gone to YouTube to try and debunk Benford's Law. Their videos are garbage. And I have plenty of mathematicians that are going to join us on our program in the coming days and they're going to debunk those videos and tell us why it's statistically improbable, if not impossible, what happened in these key cities. Why is it that certain Wisconsin counties just miles away from each other had disproportionate amounts of different turnout and different support for Joe Biden versus President Trump and 500,000 ballots just for Biden, which is something that we call undervalue voting and 14,000 dead people on the voter rolls in Michigan. Who's actually answering these questions? I would make an argument that when you stop asking these questions, when, if we give up and we don't do our job, that's the death of democracy and the beginning of a dictatorship. Just a different type of dictatorship. Instead of the type of dictatorship that the New York Times articulates, one under Pinochet or Mugabe, which is so incredibly insulting to our intelligence, because we can see very clearly what's happening in our country. And that's not this. It's a different type of dictatorship. It's a dictatorship of the fusion of big tech, big banks, Hollywood, professional athletics, the civil service, the military intelligence operations that have a cultural dictatorship and a soft political dictatorship. You see, one of the tricks of how these leftists operate in our country is they have convinced us we live in a free country with fair and free elections. Now, what's the danger of this? Because as soon as you start challenging the institutions, they say, sit down, citizen, you're actually challenging democracy. And you say, no, no, I actually want to make sure it still works. I want to stress test it, I want to look into it. I look under the hood. They say your questioning is undermining it. Well, maybe it's. That's not my, that's not my intention. My intention is actually to make sure we still have a democracy, not some sort of mirage, not some sort of aberration, not something that looks good on the outside. But the further you look into it, the more rotten to the core this is. And we've had plenty of presidents that warned us against the centralization of power. Eisenhower warned us against the military industrial complex. We've had JFK that warned us against the central banking. We've had plenty of presidents in past that warn us against the vast conglomeration and centralization of power. And that is no different now in how we do our elections. You now have cities that are able to tip an election on the margin through questionable absentee ballot practices at best, questionable voting systems that we don't trust, voter registration records that we can't audit. And you tabulate all of this together and then if you're not even allowed to ask the question, then do you actually live in the country they say we live in? They're the ones that are actually defending a hologram. They're the ones that are defending something that really doesn't exist, where you go and touch it and you realize it's just an artificial mirage of what you wish existed, but it really doesn't. It's the appearance of something being real, but it's actually completely and totally artificial. And I'm going to have that position until we can actually look under the hood, until we can see exactly what's going on here. They're the ones that are actually attacking democracy. They are the ones that are actually attacking the means of which we elect our leaders and our rulers. We're the ones that want to make sure it still works for us. Black Friday Cyber Monday 1 day only sale Wouldn't you rather just work with a company who puts you on a pedestal every day? That's what you get with PureTalk, a veteran run wireless company who understands what it means to serve Verizon at&T T Mobile. If you're with them, you're overpaying, pure and simple. Pure talk can easily save you over $400 a year. Listen, this is all you need. Unlimited Talk, text and 2 gigs of data for just 20 bucks a month. And if you go over on data usage, they don't charge you for it. What a novelty. A company that actually puts their customers first. Switching to PeerTalk is the easiest decision you'll make today. You can keep your phone and your number or get great deals on the latest iPhones and androids. Grab your mobile phone, dial £250 and say Charlie Kirk. When you do, you'll save 50% off your first month. Dial £250 and and say the keyword Charlie Kirk. PeerTalk Simply Smarter Wireless. What if I told you there is a video back in 2016 of a Dr. Andrew Appel or Apple, a Princeton professor of computer Science who actually showed us how a Dominion voting machine could be hacked to switch votes from one candidate to the other. It just so happens that video exists. Play tape. He is the bane of election officials because Princeton University professor Andrew Appel says a touchscreen voting machine, the type used in about 10 states, can be tampered with. He was able to change the votes the machine counted.

D (28:16)

I figured out how to make a slightly different computer program that just before the close of the polls, it shifts some votes around from one candidate to another. And I wrote that computer program onto a member of the chip like this. And now to hack a voting machine, you have to get seven minutes alone with it with a screwdriver.

A (28:37)

So there you have it right there. A Princeton professor who says that right before polls close, you could tamper with the Dominion voting machine. And Dominion was used in all of these different states. And so one of the remedies to fix the error with Dominion is a hand recount and a audit of every single ballot verified with poll watchers from the Trump campaign and the Biden campaign present lawyers as well. Open air, completely and totally filmed. Let's go to cut 80 of where Andrew Appel continues to show how this can be rigged. This is a Dominion voting system. Everybody. Wait till you see this. Play tape.

E (29:19)

The voting machine is called the Image Cast Evolution or ICE machine. It's made by Dominion.

A (29:24)

The Dominion voting image, Cast Evolution or

B (29:26)

ice, is an all in one accessible

A (29:28)

paper based voting system.

D (29:31)

This imagecast Evolution voting machine has the physical ability to mark votes onto the ballot after the last time the voter sees the ballot. And that's a disaster if we lose the ability to trust that the paper trail really represents what the voter intended.

E (29:49)

Andrew Appel is a professor of computer science at Princeton University.

D (29:53)

My research is in software verification and election machinery.

E (29:56)

He's an election security expert who has testified before Congress and been featured in Politico magazine.

A (30:02)

How to hack an election in seven minutes is what that video was called. Let's go to cut 81. Explanation how Dominion hardware is both a scanner and a printer. And quote, the machine can change the vote after someone last saw it. Man, is this ever a call for a forensic audit. Play tape.

E (30:20)

The machine is a combination ballot marking device and optical scanner. According to information on the company's website, the voting machine is the only optical scan tabulator using a single ballot paper path. That means it's a printer and a scanner in one.

D (30:37)

If the machine is hacked, then they can install software that marks votes on the ballot after the voter last saw it and if the piece of paper can be marked by the computer after the last time the voter saw it, and the whole paper trail is compromised.

E (30:52)

Security experts do not believe that the ICE machine is the only voting machine being sold with the ability to add votes to paper ballots. Appel and other computer Scientists believe that two versions of the ExpressVote, a ballot marking device by another company, ESNS, have the same capability. That machine has already been purchased by half a dozen states, sometimes, like in Philadelphia, over strong community opposition against expert advice.

A (31:19)

These barcodes go against the recommendation of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Pennsylvania's election security. Oh, wait, you're trying to tell me that they bought them in Philadelphia against local opposition. Now, what's so interesting about these clips is that a lot of these investigations were done by mainstream media outlets because they were trying to look into a way of how Donald Trump won in 2016 and blame it on foreign interference, which of course was never materialized. And isn't it amazing how all of this documentation existed? All of this skepticism was mainstream. Politico magazine had how to hack an election in seven minutes. It was the front page of Political magazine. And yet now you're not even allowed to ask the question. And so a lot of you are asking about the President's tweet. It very well might be this entire election is spoiled. It very well might be. It might be that the election of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia and Arizona all using Dominion software, might have the Hammer scorecard that gave a 2 to 3 point boost to Joe Biden where it mattered in certain counties, in addition to the ballot laundering operation and the counting. That's a very big possibility. And if that is true, then we need a complete and total revote, forensic audit in every single one of these states. That's right. A revote before the next President needs to be inaugurated on January 20. And the President would not be tweeting that everybody, if he did not have information, if he did not have insight that would show that Dominion might have been corrupted by the Chinese or other forces. So to continue the point here on Dominion voting systems, this might be the key to everything. Again, they were anticipating a blowout. Now, let's just play this out. President Donald Trump is doing really well in Florida. They see themselves getting crushed on same day voting and all of a sudden everyone stops counting and Virginia stopped counting. Remember, this was a Central Intelligence Agency operation. Hammer and scorecard. Virginia very well could have been the test case. They stopped counting in Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee. Who was actually looking at the voting machines in these areas. Coming up on our podcast, we have an incredible interview that we did from Jennifer Lindsey Cooper, who is a poll watcher who said there was unsupervised activity happening all throughout the TCF center, that just as a ballot counter who came from a different county into downtown Detroit, she said it was stunning. And so Dominion Voting Systems should be looked into by a couple thousand agents from the Department of Justice and the FBI immediately, right now. And if it isn't, the question should be why? Because now we have evidence that Dominion voting systems change 6,000 votes and changed in Michigan. Politico told us that this guy, Dr. Appel, could hack an election in seven minutes. Dominion voting Systems has ties to the Chinese Communist Party. And now President Trump is talking about Dominion Voting Systems, which also has ties to the Clinton Foundation. Who's to say that the Chinese didn't hack this election? We don't know yet. And the fact that the activist media is trying to say that you can't ask any of these questions, only think, makes me think we have to look farther into this. I think that Dominion Voting Systems is the key to all of this. I really do. And this would explain some of the vote switching, some of the negative votes that a lot of you have been emailing us about on cable television. This would also explain exactly why the vote counting stopped in some of the key areas, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit and Milwaukee. We just showed you from a Princeton professor, how easy it is to hack into these elections. Seven minutes or less, Politico says seven minutes or less. In fact, I want to read from that article right here. Politico Magazine, August 5, 2016. Remember when it was fashionable to actually fight the man and ask questions by Ben Wofford? Again, this was all about Russia, which is just hilarious. With Russia already meddling in 2016, a ragtag group of obsessive tech experts is warning that stealing the ultimate prize victory on November 8 would be Child's play. And it says when prison professor Andrew Appel decided to hacked into a voting machine, he didn't try to mimic the Russian attackers who attacked the DNC's database. He didn't write malicious code or linger near a polling place. Instead, he bought one online. He said that he did this with $82 and seven minutes of work. This is Dr. Andrew Appel from Princeton. This is going to be reposted on charliekirk.com isn't it interesting how Democrats used to look into this? This is a 10,000 word piece and it says in Politico, quote, no county clerk anywhere. In the United States has the ability to defend themselves against advanced, persistent threats. This is Politico, everybody. And they're trying to say you can't ask this question. Okay, well, I'm asking the question because I don't trust what we're seeing right now. And that's a great segue to the great Jon Voight. This is one of the greatest videos I have seen play tape.

C (36:24)

My fellow Americans, I stand here with all that feel, as I do, disgusted with this lie that Biden has been chosen, as if we all don't know the truth. And when one tries to deceive, we know that one can't get away with it. There will be a price to pay. The ones who are jumping for joy now are jumping toward the horror they will be in for. Because I know that the promises being made from the left to the American people will never come to be my friends of all colors, races and religions. This is now our greatest fight since the Civil War. The battle of righteousness versus Satan. Yes, Satan. Because these leftists are evil, corrupt, and they want to tear down this nation. We must not allow this. We must fight this corruption that has taken over and fight for the good that seems lost. Let us give our trust to God and fight now for Trump's victory, because we all know this ballot count is corruption, like they are. So let us not back down. Let us fight this fight as if it is our last fight on Earth. As Muhammad Ali said, it's not over till the last punch you have. God bless.

A (38:09)

Amen. Well, Jon Voight, I'm going to tell you, we are not going to stop fighting here on this program. And what we are doing to uncover exactly what's happened here, and it is a fraud on the American people. We need a federal investigation and Senate hearings and DOJ employees and FBI staffers and agents looking into Dominion voting systems right now. Were votes changed? Bring in the voting experts. Dr. Appel, who says he can hack this in seven minutes or less and, quote, no one is ready for the hack that is incoming. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. If you want to support us, charliekirk.com support we are traveling the country right now and we'll be back in our normal schedule, hopefully very soon. If you want us to answer your ask me anything questions, email us. Freedom charliekirk.com Freedom charliekirk.com Thanks so much for listening, everybody. God bless.