Transcript
A (0:00)
Thank you for listening to this Podcast 1 production now available on Apple Podcasts, Podcast 1, Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Hey everybody. Special treat for you today, an exclusive interview with Roger Stone, who just had his sentence commuted by President Trump. You are not going to want to miss this. I want to thank our supporters that help contribute and chip into our show@charliekirk.com charliekirk.com support by supporting our show, you keep our show self sufficient and allow us to be protected from leftist boycotts that want to destroy this program and programs like this that tell the truth. So thank you for going to charliekirk.com support and supporting this program. Email me your questions freedomarliekirk.com, freedomarliekirk.com email me the questions that you want me to to ask Senator ted cruz@freedomarliekirk.com freedomarliekirk.com Also, if you want to win a signed copy of the MAGA Doctrine, type in Charlie Kirk Show Hit, subscribe, give us a five star review, screenshot it, and email us freedomarliekirk.com Roger Stone on the Charlie Kirk Show. Buckle up everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
B (1:15)
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are
A (1:18)
lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
B (1:24)
I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible his spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point usa.
A (1:34)
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives. And we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. Hey everybody, we have a special guest here on the Charlie Kirk show, someone that I have been advocating for his freedom for quite a while now. And President Trump did the right thing and commuted his sentence. None other than Roger Stone. Roger, welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show.
B (2:05)
Charlie, I'm really very glad to be here. And right off the top, I have to tell you that I really appreciate the fact that you were among a handful of conservatives who were willing to go to bat when you saw the epic injustice in my situation. I mean, it is clear to any reasonable person who will look that I was targeted for strictly political reasons because I had a 40 year relationship with the President, because I recognized as early as 1988 that he had the capacity to not only be a great candidate for president, but actually be a great president because of his courage and his independence and his. I thought he would be a terrific candidate and a terrific president, and he has more than fulfilled my expectations in that regard. He's a man of enormous stamina, enormous courage. He's very bold, and he's interested in results. He's interested in what works. And unlike any other president in recent time, he doesn't answer to any special interests. This guy answers only to the American people. Not Wall street, not the oil and gas industry, not banking, not insurance, not. Not the deep state, not the defense contractors, but only the American people. It's very refreshing. And it brought us not only the strongest economy in our history, but he rebuilt our military, and he continues to fight to keep our borders secure. The Central question for 2020 to me is an obvious one. Who better now to rebuild our economy? A man who's already proven that he knows exactly how to do it, or a man whose prescription will make the patient even sicker? It's pretty obvious to me that Trump knows precisely how to rebuild the economy, in fact, because his underlying policies of cutting taxes and regulation and cutting better trade deals for America is already in place. The economy's already on its way back, despite COVID 19. Look at these last two job reports. They're off the charts. But it really was a handful of people who had the courage to, you know, to call the left out, to call the deep state out, and to criticize what was being done to me because I was being lynched. And it continues to this day. You have Robert Mueller out in an op ed in the Washington Post recycling the same old falsehood. No, Bob, I'm sorry, but I was not in touch with a Russian intelligence officer. I was in touch with some guy on Twitter, direct messages. And that exchange was entirely released by me to the Media in 2017. The content of it is entirely benign. It has no evidence of collusion or collaboration. And it happened after. Long after the WikiLeaks had released all of his documents. So chronologically, collusion would be impossible. And while we're at it, there is no evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is that Persona. You say it's a Russian intelligence asset. There's a lot more forensic evidence that indicates that it's an American intelligence asset. I've written about this extensively at the Stone Cold Truth. At a minimum, it is a disputed matter. But these folks believe just because John Brennan says something is true, that makes it true. Like the Steele dossier is real, that makes it real. It doesn't work that way. So they recycle this Then the best part of this is Rod Rosenstein jumps on. He takes a paragraph from Mueller's op ed, but then he very deceptively edits it and he says Stone was in touch with a known Russian intelligence officer, officers. And then he changes that. Pardon me, he changed that from a Russian intelligence officer known to us to a known Russian intelligence officer. Making it sound like I willfully contacted somebody that I knew was in Russian intelligence. Not the fact that guy Rosenstein, he is the slimiest of the swamp creatures. He's responsible for this entire hoax. And now we have Andrew Weissman saying, oh, we've got to drag Stone in front of the grand jury. And the whole meme here which has to be addressed is let me be as clear as I can. It is not a question of my possessing any knowledge or evidence of, of any misconduct or wrongdoing by the President which I withheld in an effort to cover up for him and got a commutation of my sentence in return. I never said anything of the kind. What I have said on the record over and over, which my lawyers will attest to, is that I was approached by the special counsel and they solicited me to tell lies about the President, to bear falsehood against the President. To re remember now, sure, they were very clever in the way they couched it. It's time for your client to come clean. It's time for your client to confess. It's time for your client to re remember. But the intent was clear. And I said no, absolutely not. So right now the left, led by Howard Feynman who texts me and says he's not doing it. And then I read what he's saying and he's out there implying constantly that I'm hiding. I had nothing to hide. Every fuzzy headed leftwood law professor in the country is now saying Stone can be retried for this, that and the other thing. Let's be clear. If they had any evidence of Russian collusion or coordinating with the Russian state to obtain and disseminate emails or any connection with WikiLeaks in which there was evidence of that, they would have charged me with it. They had every scrap of evidence in my possession. They went through all my cell phones, all my electronic devices, my computer, my laptop. They had full access to all my paper records and all they could do was to hook up this really thin lie to Congress indictment. An indictment in which I continued to argue that none of the misstatements that I made to Congress were either material and therefore they had no intent. There was no reason to lie. None of the misstatements hid an underlying crime. This was the best Andrew Weiss could come up with. But now he's saying, let's drag Stone in front of the grand jury and we can get to the bottom of the Russian collusion hoax. It's a hoax. There is no more. I don't possess any information detrimental to the President. And when Rick Gates, Paul Manafort's former bag man, and he must be very strong because those bags were heavy. And Michael Cohen, the turncoat who was convicted of multiple financial crimes, came forward and said they overheard telephone conversations between myself and candidate Trump in which we discussed WikiLeaks. There's no corroboration of that anywhere. Gates said he heard it in a moving car, in an suv, that there were two Secret Service agents present in early August. But there's no telephone record and there's no evidence of testimony by the Secret Service agents. So it is the uncorroborated plea bargain induced testimony of a convict in the case of Michael Cohen. He first said the conversation happened in July. And he said that stone told Trump WikiLeaks will soon be dumping a bunch of data. So, theoretically, it would have been before the Democratic primary. But then he changed his story and said, no, it was in August, just before the Republican convention. Well, WikiLeaks didn't dump any information August, nor September, nor until the beginning of October. Again, no witnesses, the female secretary said, came into the room and said, you know, Mr. Stone, Roger Stone's on line one. No corroboration from her. That's because neither one of these conversations ever happened. I said that under oath to the House Intelligence Committee. The President said it in his written answers under oath to Robert Mueller. There's no evidence to the contrary because both of us are telling the truth. But the truth doesn't matter to the crazed left. These people are hysterical. They're out for blood, and they have me in mind.
