← The Charlie Kirk Show
Loading summary
Transcript17 lines
- [00:00]
A
Is there any evidence out there? We dive into the different types of evidence and how it applies to you. Also, we talk about To Kill a Mockingbird, so you don't want to miss that, please. If you guys want to win a signed copy of the MAGA Doctrine, we will give out five signed copies of the New York Times bestseller the MAGA Doctrine to five random people that show us you're subscribed to the Charlie Kirk show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Screenshot it and email it to us@freedom charliekirk.com and in the subject line, just say to Kill a Mockingbird. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
- [00:45]
B
I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy, his spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point usa.
- [00:55]
A
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives. And we, we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here. I want to dive into what's happening right now in the fight to re elect President Trump to four more years. President Trump is currently fighting his way through the courts. Democrats are doing whatever they possibly can to try and stop it. And whatever the outcome of this election, no matter what happens, the most important question is what happened on November 3rd and what can we do to make sure this never happens again? That is actually the most important question. Despite the absolute nonstop drumbeat of the media and all their denials of saying there's no evidence of election tampering, the truth, the rational, the reason based truth is that there's extensive and undeniable evidence of that exact activity. At least. If by evidence you mean that there's no evidence that would be allowed in a court proceeding, we'll get into that in a second because I really want to dive into that. As is so typical in today's America, terms are being tossed around by people who have no idea what they're talking about or what the terms actually mean. You see, it sounds really kind of snobbishly smart to be able to say as you're wearing your three masks, walking your dog on the way to Starbucks next to your communist neighbor, oh, yes, there's no evidence that Donald Trump was cheated. Sounds nice to say that. But the people who are saying that are either lying outright, which they might be or they're so ignorant of what it actually means to have evidence. So let's dive into it. I don't think enough shows or programs are actually explaining what it means to have evidence because it sounds obvious, right? But there's actually a deeper point here. So to be very clear, in a criminal court proceeding there are actually four different types of evidence. There's real evidence. This is what is also called physical evidence. Guns or knives or DNA, fingerprints. That is what is called real evidence. The second form of evidence is testimonial evidence. This is the account of witnesses who directly saw or heard something relevant to the incidents I saw XYZ come in and shoot. That is testimonial evidence. There's documentary evidence. The third type of evidence, it's just like it sounds. It's documents that can be produced such as bank records, diaries, ballots that all support the claim of one side or the other. The fourth type of evidence is demonstrative evidence. That's usually charts and diagrams that demonstrate or illustrate the witness testimony. Maps, diagrams of a crime scene, charts and graphs that illustrate physical or financial injury to a party are examples of demonstrative evidence. So in order for evidence from any of the above categories we just talked about or the aforementioned categories to be admissible in a legal proceeding, it must be must meet the following three very self explanatory but very subjective criteria. It must be relevant, it must be material, and it must be component. It is important to note that whether or not evidence is admissible is not related to its definition of evidence. Evidence that does not in the mind of a judge meet all three of those criteria can still be evidence. But let's consider all four of those types of evidence. Let's go through this as if it was a legal proceeding. Real evidence. Well, we already have that. This is the type of evidence that can be found in Georgia where physical ballots have been found to be uncounted, or in Pennsylvania where signatures cannot be matched against those on the file. There are other similar problems that we talked about in Arizona and Michigan and Wisconsin. We have mountains of real evidence. How about testimonial evidence? Well, as of this moment, there are hundreds of sworn affidavits of people that say they saw wrongdoing. We have testimonial evidence up to the sky of people that have said they saw multiple ballots being inputted into machines. We saw people that were coming in with ballots that were not being checked. We saw military ballots being filled out for Joe Biden. There's also testimonial evidence Regarding all aspects of of the dominion voting machines. How about documentary evidence? In this case, the documentary evidence overlaps with the real evidence because of the nature of ballots. Video evidence, for example, of these suitcases filled with ballots could also fall under this category as it gives support to testimonial evidence of Georgia election workers. The video evidence also walks a fine line between being documentary and real evidence, which I should say is in the four categories of evidence. It could be in one bucket and also another. We have so much documentary evidence. We have video evidence of people ripping up ballots. We have video evidence of people filling in ballots. We have video evidence of people tearing ballots they don't like. We have video evidence of people finding suitcases full of ballots. How about demonstrative evidence? Now in this case we would be considering the development of diagrams that laid out the problems of vote chain of of custody issues, physical layouts of vote counting centers and where vote observers were not allowed to be standing, and the reenactment of the evidence to limit monitoring of vote counts. When viewed in all of its totality, which of is now is really impossible to do because of the widespread dispersion of evidence? It is easy to say that anyone who looks at the four categories of evidence, if they're looking at this objectively and rationally and empirically, can say that all four categories of evidence are more than satisfied and fulfilled under the thesis that this election was tampered with. So the real question is, if all four categories of evidence are fulfilled, why haven't the courts reversed this election? Look, the legal system doesn't work like your parents kitchen table. The legal system doesn't work like a fraternity where you try to find out who stole the six pack of beer. The legal system doesn't work the way that it might with a group of friends that are investigating who might have broken the other person's car. You see, the first is the subjective criteria mentioned above or previously of materiality, competency and relevance to be met in a court. And the long and short of it is the judges are not impartial here and we kind of don't want them to be. We don't want Democrats in the future to be able to go in front of a judge and overturn an election to that might have actually been fair. Or in Florida or Texas it is a higher threshold to overturn an election. It is. We can try to convince ourselves that judges wear black robes to be impartial and they're always going to be ruling with sobriety. That is not the case. These Judges do not want to be known as a judge that overturned an election despite the mountains of evidence in the real evidence, testimonial, documentary and demonstrative categories. But the biggest problem is this is time. Typically, when you put together a criminal case or a civil case, you are afforded anywhere between a year to 18 months to get all of your evidence in a row. Find the holes that they might poke in them, be able to get witnesses exactly where you want them, answer cross examination, be able to get in a courtroom and anticipate the arguments and the counter arguments. These legal cases are being rushed through. The system are super complex and there's very little time. There is a deadline that matters. That deadline is January 20th. That is a constitutional deadline. On January 20th, a new president must get inaugurated either to another term or a new president altogether. I should say another term must be instituted or instated. Look, it's not often you get a gift for yourself, but I need to tell you about something that you gotta buy. It's called a hedge against all the craziness in the market. It's a free 22 karat American Gold Eagle coin. Not bad, right? A free 22 karat American Gold Eagle coin in a special presentation box. To qualify, you have to take out a precious metals IRA or 401k rollover with Noble Gold. Makes a lot of sense right? Now. This to keep your savings and investments safe. Who knows what the next administration will do or what's going to happen. So look, we don't know what's coming next. And you have to have a hedge. They're creating money. Austrian school of economics is completely under attack. So if you guys want to hedge against all the market volatility and we know what's coming, inflation is coming. Call 877-646-5347 and get the special coin offer. But don't hang around. That's 877646, 5347. Tell them that Charlie Kirk sent you again. That's Noble Gold, 877-646-5347. The problem with going through the courts is that prejudice has now become the standard of our justice system in America. Increasingly, our courts have strayed away from this idea of blind justice now to blind partisanship. The courts are not what they were intended to be. The courts were always supposed to be above any sort of partisan bickering. Our legal system has become so unbelievably corrupt that it cannot be trusted in any way whatsoever to admit evidence rationally. Rationally. Or view it objectively. But here's who can. The American people can. Now, if you go back to the Federalist Papers and back to our founding fathers, the founding fathers always viewed the state legislatures as being the voice of the people, the closest to the citizenry. Now, are we subjects or are we citizens? That's the question that we have to wrestle with. Being a citizen, according to its original Greek, where we get the word citizen from actually means being a co ruler. This is exactly why we used to elect US Senators via the state legislatures. We got rid of that with I think the 17th Amendment. We can. The 17th. We got rid of that with the 17th Amendment, which implemented the direct election of senators. One of the worst mistakes I think ever made that turned US Senators into pseudo celebrities engaging in a popularity contest. No longer actually under the threat of a recall or a check and balance from the state legislature. Now that's not to say we might not get some favorable court rulings, but Sidney Powell's election and Lin Wood's election, I'm sorry, election lawsuit on the election in Georgia just got thrown out recently and Samuel Alito did not grant emergency relief. Is that the right way to word it? Emergency relief in Pennsylvania yesterday. So what measures do we have left? What is the last reset that we can go to the state legislatures? Now I want to go to Kelly Shackelford here, who is from First Liberty. We had him exclusively on the Charlie Kirk show podcast last evening. I really encourage you to listen to this interview in full if you're interested in getting an idea of exactly what's happening here and what kind of lawsuits might end up being successful. Let's go to states. Let's go to cut 65 or Kelly Shackelford explains that the states did not follow what the legislature set in law, which the Constitution says they have to follow. Cut 65.
- [13:53]
C
Whatever the state legislature said is what you have to do. And of course, in a number of these states, they violated what the state legislature said. I mean take, let's take Pennsylvania, right? Pennsylvania said. And the law says if you're going to do, you know, these mail in ballots, they have to be in by the, by the time of the election. Well, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which is Democrat, said, no, no, you know, we're going to extend that through the end of the week. Well, you can't do that. The legislature determines.
- [14:27]
A
The legislature actually determines it. So what Kelly Shackelford was talking about in Georgia, which is exactly what the Georgia state legislature should come in, is they should correct what Stacey Abrams and Raffensperger did. And Kelly Shackelford really built this out beautifully. I thought on our podcast yesterday, better than any other pundit or commentator where he said this Stacey Abrams sues Roethlisberger Roethensperger surrenders who's the Republican Secretary of State of Georgia and settles. He settled the civil suit with Stacey Abrams and changed state law. Now, Raffensperger might thought he had to do this because he was under an order from a judge or whatever it might be. But that cannot usurp, overthrow or defy a state legislature. If the state legislatures meet in Georgia, they could say that we need to recount all the ballots under 2018 standards, that any sort of civil suit that was settled by Raffensperger can be thrown out. The same can be done in Arizona, where the state legislature's wishes and demands were overthrown by a Secretary of state. I think it's Katie Hobbs right in Arizona. And Adrian Fontes Small Business Banking there's only one name you need to know. It's aslo. ASLO offers a free business checking account with invoicing bill pay, no minimum balance requirements, and no maintenance or overdraft fees. Instead of the days it takes at a traditional bank where you're still required to go in person with ASLO, you go to AZLO.com and apply in minutes. There is no waiting to use your account. With aslo's free instant funding feature, you can deposit up to $1,000 and access it instantly. And now they've launched the all new ASLO Pro Bundle for only $10 a month with tools like unlimited envelopes to organize your money, discounted instant transfers, and the ability to set up recurring invoices. Because you listen to this podcast, you can try ASLO Pro free for 14 days@aslo.com Charlie aslo.com does an amazing job. I know a lot of people that have done. They've really been able to figure out their banking needs through aslo. Terrific work. So go to aslo.com charlie a z l o.com charlie a z l O.com charlie we have been walking through the current state of affairs state by state. We had the amazing Kelly Shackleford explain this, I think with better clarity than any guest I have heard recently. Because a lot of you guys are emailing us freedomarliekirk.com and you say what on earth is going on? How can I help what is happening? And we just went through the four different types of evidence, which of course is real, testimonial, documentary and demonstrative. But what this all comes down to is the state legislatures. That's it. Your pressure on the state legislatures is everything. Let's go to cut. Do we play cut 65? I don't think we did cut 65. Play tape of Kelly Shackelford who has argued cases in front of the Supreme Court. He does this for a living. He's a great friend. Play tape.
- [18:03]
C
Whatever the state legislature said is what you have to do. And of course, in a number of these states, they violated what the state legislature says. I mean, take, let's take Pennsylvania, right? Pennsylvania says, and the law says if you're going to do, you know, these mail in ballots, they have to be in by the, by the time of the election. Well, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which is Democrat, said, no, no, you know, we're going to extend that through the end of the week. Well, you can't do that. The legislature determines.
- [18:38]
A
So what Kelly Shackelford is talking about here is that the legislature is the authority. If you don't like it, then go change the United States Constitution. This is an originalist, textualist position. Let's play cut 66. Kelly Shackelford talks about how there is time and the December 14th date can be changed, but there has to be some really good evidence presented. We talked about evidence, remember, this is why the courts all of a sudden can get a little bit messy. Play cut 66.
- [19:07]
C
There is time, but everybody's kind of looking at December 14th, where the electoral votes are cast. And.
- [19:12]
A
But that could be moved.
- [19:13]
C
It could, it could be. They could, they could. And they could overturn that just because the electoral votes are cast. It still would go to the House and the Senate, but I don't think any of that's going to happen unless something is shown in court that the American people get to see and then realize, okay, this is a problem.
- [19:34]
A
And so Kelly Shackelford then goes to talk about how the best example of this though is the Georgia lawsuit. Probably the best chance we have is the recently filed Georgia lawsuit by Cleta Mitchell and the campaign. Play cut 67.
- [19:50]
C
The things that Cleta did in the lawsuit are things that were really undeniable. I mean, you have records of how old people are. It says so and so voted and you have a record of how old they were and they weren't eligible to vote. You have, you know, what the law says about comparing the signatures and they know exactly how many of those wasn't done. And so literally what you should do is throw all those votes out. And what you would probably have to do in Georgia is have another election.
- [20:18]
A
And that shouldn't be out of the realm of possibility, of the realm of conversation. So now we have going up to the Supreme Court. Texas started a movement yesterday, and now Louisiana, Missouri, I think Florida has joined as well to sue Georgia. A little bit of an SEC rivalry going on here. They're also suing Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan. And the attorney General of Jeff Landry, who's terrific, who I texted actually during our program yesterday, said, quote, louisiana citizens are damaged if elections in other states were conducted outside the confines of the Constitution while we obeyed the rules. And so the state legislatures have an opportunity to do something about this, but it's Republicans that are actually refusing to fight. A special session is not necessarily needed. You see, the wants and the needs, the desires, the demands and the laws of the state legislatures were intentionally defied in these elections. Intentionally defied. The state legislatures had very specific orders and the Secretary of State and these outside groups and these liberal Democrats decided not to follow the rules. The recourse should be ballots not counting and completely and totally new elections. That's what the recourse should be. So the time is running out. That is the one thing. There is some time constraints here. It's not the same time constraints that they're telling you. What did Google say today? That we passed the safe harbor deadline? Is that what they said? That all of a sudden they're putting in a no fly zone? You can't even talk about election fraud anymore on YouTube. Which is why we are not currently streaming this conversation on YouTube. I'm not in the martyr business, so we're gonna try to navigate that in some form or fashion. Thank God for terrestrial radio and for podcasting. The only deadline that really does matter here is January 20th. That one is constitutional. The two deadlines that were constitutional or are is the election first Tuesday after the first Monday in November and January 20th. That's it. Those are constitutional for good reason. You want to have firm deadlines to be able to have a peaceful transition of power. And by the way, a peaceful transition of power is a uniquely American practice. President Trump never had a peaceful transition of power. They spied on him, entrapped. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, launched a coup against him, lied about it. Biden mentioned the Logan act in the Oval Office meeting. The coup in the con was launched. They planted metaphorical minds all throughout the White House. And before you knew it, the Trump administration by June had a special prosecutor whispers about Russia, despite China being our greatest threat. And I want to talk about that. There is now growing chatter around China. It's really interesting how a lot of this China conversation is happening after the election. Wouldn't have been nice to have a China conversation. I don't know, around October 25th, when we were, when we asked which candidate was more purchased by China. How about the candidate where we have a laptop that goes to show international business deals being done by China? How about the candidate where we have Tony Bobulinski, the former CEO of the Biden business, come out and testify and say that Joe Biden was in direct contact with the Chinese Communist Party and doing business with the Chinese Communist Party to enrich his family. I guarantee a lot of those criminal investigations are going to disappear very soon. The new attorney general, have they appointed an attorney general yet? No. Might be Doug Jones is what they're saying, might come in and all of a sudden all those investigations will go away, but they will continue to investigate Donald Trump. In fact, there was an Atlantic piece that came out today and said, here's how we continue to investigate Donald Trump. So Eric Swalwell, who is the Russia hoaxer who created a cable television career out of pushing lies against Donald Trump on Russian collusion. Cut 37. Let's go to that. Just to refresh our memory of this petulant child who got elected to Congress, was trying to start a war against Russia based on lies. Cut 37.
- [24:59]
D
Russia attacked our democracy this past election and then they showed up to his Trump Tower, offered the evidence to his family. They received it. They didn't turn it down. Donald Trump for years had been working with the Russians. He brought people on his campaign who had ties to the Russians. We have seen a candidate and a president who has spoken in very flattering ways about Vladimir Putin. All of the arrows continue to point to a personal, political and financial relationship that Donald Trump had with the Russians,
- [25:29]
A
that he was the one that was advancing and pushing this incredibly divisive and pernicious Russian. Lieutenant, I am not a person who thinks that Russia is a good country. I think Vladimir Putin is a thug. I also don't think we have to be saber rattling against a country that has a declining population. Their only source of wealth is the petrodollar. We're energy independent. Their military is something to be somewhat concerned about. But they just want regional hegemony. And Russia is not our greatest enemy. They are one third of our population. We could have a stasis with Russia. They're more of an annoyance than a threat. Russia is a mosquito. China is an empire. At least they're trying to be an empire. And the Federal B of Investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, I shouldn't say that so quickly. The FBI says they have 1,000 investigations into Chinese technology theft, Confucius Institutes, islands in the South China Sea, technology transfers, dumping of steel, a million Muslims in concentration camps. I have called China our greatest enemy. I think we should suspend all trade with China. Absolutely, totally and categorically. I say this because I am not purchased by the Chamber of Commerce. Anyone who is afraid to call for the suspension of all trade with China probably has a capital flow from some Chinese auxiliary company or power source. Many of you listening to this remember the Soviet Union. You remember how the Soviet Union tried to take over the world. The Chinese Communist Party is implementing a blueprint that is completely different than that of the Soviet playbook. The Soviet playbook was one of internationalist expansion which. One of the biggest lies taught to young people in schools is that the Communist Soviet experiment was a, was confined to the Soviet Union. In fact, some lunatic once tried to say that to me at the University of Minnesota and I nicely countered him. It's actually one of our best performing videos out there. The Soviets supported Robert Mugabe, which turned Rhodesia into Zimbabwe. The Soviets had sleeper cells in Nicaragua, El Salvador. They helped with the Venezuelan experiment, the Argentinian experiment. They tried to implement communism in India and Afghanistan, Southeast Asia and Vietnam, the Korean peninsula. The Communists tried everywhere. Cuba, of course, is an easy example. So this idea that the Soviet Union didn't try to take over the world is nonsense. But the Chinese Communist Party has similar global ambitions. But the ccp, I think they actually read the Art of War because the ccp, instead of trying to actually
- [28:29]
D
do
- [28:30]
A
what the Soviet Union did and close themselves off, they've immersed themselves. Instead of trying to say that we're going to build up our own self contained empire, we're going to influence and infiltrate everything. This is different than the Soviet Union because instead of trying to have coups and revolutions like the Soviet Union did, the CCP has just purchased the leadership of the entire globe. In finance, sports, culture, music, film, cinema, they own everything. Because as Sun Tzu said, the greatest victory is that which requires no battle. The Chinese Communist Party takes that very seriously. They say, how do we actually avoid conflict? They say, well, why don't we use our singular advantage? China has only one advantage. They have a lot of people, that's it. Let's make stuff cheaper because we have so many people that are in the third world and they'll make it for 5 cents an hour or 5 cents a day and we'll deindustrialize the West. We'll use that money to go purchase their elites and their political system. They'll buy all the plastic from us. We'll conquer the world without ever starting a battle. When running a business, HR issues can kill you. I can tell you from Turning Point USA that wrongful termination suits, minimum wage requirements, labor regulations, they can really add up. HR manager salaries are never cheap. They're an average of $70,000 a year. Look, you've heard me talk about Bambi before. They're terrific. It's Bambi spelled B A, M, B, E, E. They were created specifically for you, the small businessman. You can get a dedicated HR Manager, Craft HR Policy and maintain your compliance, all for just $99 a month. With Bambi, you can change HR from your biggest liability to your biggest strength. Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone, email or real time chat. From onboarding to terminations. They customize your policies to fit your business and they help you manage your employees day to day. All for just $99 a month. Month to month. There are no hidden fees. Cancel anytime. You didn't start your business because you wanted to spend time on HR compliance. Let Bambi help. Get your free HR audit today. Go to Bambi.com Kirk right now to schedule your free HR audit. That's Bambi.com Kirk spell BAM to the B E-E.com Kirk California School District considers Ban on Classic Books To Kill a Mockingbird, Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry of Mice and Men, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and the K by Theodore Taylor. That's the one I don't know. Now, I don't support any of these censorship. It's so amazing to me how the left wants to almost normalize pornography for 11 and 12 year olds, yet they want to take out To Kill a Mockingbird. They allow sexual education that is so graphic that if you saw it, you would take all your kids out of high school immediately. Yet they don't want to kill a mockingbird. In our schools. They have the most graphic video games that they want 11 and 12 year olds to play. Yet they don't want to kill a mockingbird. In our schools. It's the same people that say, go wear your mask, by the way, go do heroin. It's not exactly a congruent line of thinking. It's all about chaos, disruption, disorder, disunity, power. The To Kill a Mockingbird one I think is the most stunning. To me, it is the piece of literature I'm Most familiar with. I remember when I first read To Kill a Mockingbird back in seventh grade. It's a very powerful book. That's a tough read for a seventh grader. It just is. There's a lot of difficult themes and I'll never forget in my high school, my middle school, despite it being very liberal, if I'm not mistaken. To Kill a Mockingbird has the N word in it, I believe, several times. But this is the way that we handled it. When I was in seventh grade. Seventh grade, we read To Kill a Mockingbird. Do you know how we handled it? Our teacher got us together and they said in this book is a test of whether or not you can handle things that shouldn't be said. There are words in this book that I don't want to hear anyone say, but we're still gonna read it. And they send out waivers, by the way, for our parents to sign. Cuz that's. That's probably the right way to do it. And they said this is how people used to talk in our country. But this story is a heroic story. It's a story about the presumption of innocence, wrongful accusation. It's about the court process. And it's just a great narrative of the antebellum South. It just is. Atticus Finch is the hero of it. Boo Radley, I believe, is the individual that is wrongly accused. No, I got my characters all screwed up. Anyway, point is that if I remember correctly, it's a black man that's accused of something he didn't do and he gets let off in trial thanks to Atticus Fitch. Boo Radley's the recluse. I'm sorry, he's the guy that just comes out. Anyway, the point is that I remember learning the book, I remember the themes behind it, but without any censorship whatsoever, we were given the book. We read it and everyone in our classroom, everyone in Tom Robinson was the black man's name. Everyone in our class in our grade was better because of it. We read To Kill a Mockingbird again on a deeper level, when I was a sophomore in high school, same thing. We read Adventures of Huckleberry Finn with all of the bad words in them. But do you know what actually made us do it? Made us not say those words. Yeah, there was some smart alecks and some lunatics that said it. But guess what? We understood the seriousness and we understood the weight of what happened if you said those words like cut it out. That's not funny. Because in that book they actually viewed people as sub human. You See, that's actually the maturation process. Those are people getting older. You see, you understand that people are more likely to be racist if you remove these books, right? That people are more likely to go join the kkk. People are more likely to believe in nonsense like Critical Race Theory and BLM Incorporated. When you remove these literatures, it's the literature that actually makes you a more mature and more worldly person. I saw it work instead, the removal of these books and putting in books like Angela Davis, 1619, Project Nikole, Hannah Jones, Critical Race Theory, Herbert Marcuse. It creates hyper racist people against white people against white men. The National Coalition Against Censorship is doing this to fight against it for good reason. I'm afraid the censors are going to win because under this idea of racial reckoning, they are creating the most racist generation of young people since the kkk. That is the agenda of the Democrat Party. Divide people on race, sex and class. That's all they care about. They don't care about individuals, they don't care about human beings. They don't care about character. They don't care about your spirituality. Instead they view you as a specific piece of a broader power struggle. They say, how can we overthrow the West? Well, not by continually reading the books that actually made the west decent. Cut out that To Kill a Mockingbird thing that makes people like each other. Instead, let's go make things that make people angry. That creates little activists that create seventh graders that want to burn down the country, not want to improve their character. And that's why they want to destroy the central canon that I grew up reading and I'm only 27 years old. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. If you want to get involved with Turning Point USA, go to tpusa.com tpusa. Com. Please consider supporting us at charliekirk. Com support. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. God bless. Speak to you soon.